Novel species of Huntiella from naturally-occurring forest trees in Greece and South Africa

FeiFei Liu; Seonju Marincowitz; ShuaiFei Chen; Michael Mbenoun; Panaghiotis Tsopelas; Nikoleta Soulioti; Michael J. Wingfield

doi:10.3897/mycokeys.69.53205

Research Article

Novel species of Huntiella from naturally-occurring forest trees in Greece and South Africa

FeiFei Liu^‡§, Seonju Marincowitz^‡, ShuaiFei Chen^‡§, Michael Mbenoun^‡, Panaghiotis Tsopelas^|, Nikoleta Soulioti^|, Michael J. Wingfield^‡

‡ University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

§ Chinese Academy of Forestry, GuangDong, China

| Institute of Mediterranean Forest Ecosystems, Athens, Greece

Corresponding author: ShuaiFei Chen ( shuaifei.chen@gmail.com )

Academic editor: Rungtiwa Phookamsak

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation: Liu F, Marincowitz S, Chen S, Mbenoun M, Tsopelas P, Soulioti N, Wingfield MJ (2020) Novel species of Huntiella from naturally-occurring forest trees in Greece and South Africa. MycoKeys 69: 33-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.69.53205

Abstract

Huntiella species are wood-infecting, filamentous ascomycetes that occur in fresh wounds on a wide variety of tree species. These fungi are mainly known as saprobes although some have been associated with disease symptoms. Six fungal isolates with typical culture characteristics of Huntiella spp. were collected from wounds on native forest trees in Greece and South Africa. The aim of this study was to identify these isolates, using morphological characters and multigene phylogenies of the rRNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, portions of the β-tubulin (BT1) and translation elongation factor 1α (TEF-1α) genes. The mating strategies of these fungi were also determined through PCR amplification of mating type genes. The study revealed two new species; one from Platanus orientalis in Greece and one from Colophospermum mopane and Senegalia nigrescens in South Africa. These novel taxa have been provided with the names, H. hellenica sp. nov. and H. krugeri sp. nov., respectively. The former species was found to have a homothallic and the latter a heterothallic mating system.

Keywords

Ceratocystidaceae, Ceratocystis moniliformis Complex, Colophospermum mopane, Huntiella, Platanus orientalis, saprobes, Senegalia nigrescens

Introduction

Huntiella species are members of the family Ceratocystidaceae (Microascales, Sordariomycetes) as defined by De Beer et al. (2014). This family includes 15 genera, namely Ambrosiella, Berkeleyomyces, Bretziella, Catunica, Ceratocystis, Chalaropsis, Davidsoniella, Endoconidiophora, Huntiella, Meredithiella, Phialophoropsis, Solaloca, Tielaviopsis, Toshiolenlla and Wolfgangiella (De Beer et al. 2014, 2017; Mayers et al. 2015, 2020; Nel et al. 2018). The type species of Huntiella, H. moniliformis, was first isolated from a sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) in Texas, USA (Von Schrenk 1903). It was initially described as Ceratostomella moniliformis (Hedgcock 1906) and later transferred to Ceratocystis (Moreau 1952). When the family Ceratocystidaceae was redefined (De Beer et al. 2014), Huntiella was established as a distinct genus, which can be distinguished from Ceratocystis and other members of the Ceratocystidaceae, based on their unique morphological features (Davidson 1935; Van Wyk et al. 2006; Wingfield et al. 2013). Most Huntiella spp. are easily recognised by a relatively-thick collar plate connecting the ascomatal necks and bases and ascomatal bases that are rough and ornamented with conical spines (Hedgcock 1906). In addition, aleurioconidia are rarely found in Huntiella species unlike most species of Ceratocystis sensu stricto with which they were previously confused (Hedgcock 1906; De Beer et al. 2014; Mbenoun et al. 2016).

Many species in the Ceratocystidaceae are important pathogens of woody plants, including agricultural, fruit and forest tree crops (Kile 1993; Roux and Wingfield 2009). These pathogens result in a multiplicity of symptoms, such as branch and stem cankers, vascular staining, wilt, root rot, die-back and fruit rot (Kile 1993; Harrington 2004; Roux and Wingfield 2009). Huntiella spp. are generally considered saprobes or weak pathogens associated with relatively-minor lesions or sap stain of timber (Van Wyk et al. 2004, 2006, 2011; Tarigan et al. 2010; Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2012; Chen et al. 2013; Mbenoun et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2018). However, there have been a few reports of more severe disease symptoms and even mortality caused by Huntiella spp. (Cristobal and Hansen 1962; De Errasti et al. 2015)

Huntiella species are most commonly isolated from freshly-made wounds on trees, to which they are vectored by insects, especially sap-feeding beetles in the Nitidulidae (Heath et al. 2009; Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2012; Mbenoun et al. 2016, 2017). It has been suggested that the relationship between Huntiella species and sap beetle is symbiotic and mutually beneficial, as the insects benefit from essential nutritional supplementation from their fungal partners, while the fungi benefit from transportation and access to scanty and ephemeral substrates (Mbenoun et al. unpublished data). Moreover, one species (H. bhutanensis) is found in association with the bark beetle Ips schmutzenhoferi (Van Wyk et al. 2004), which is similar to various important species of Endoconidiophora (De Beer et al. 2014), although the nature of insect-fungus interaction in this association is unknown.

Huntiella spp. are particularly interesting in terms of their mating biology. Huntiella fecunda and H. moniliformis were, for example, shown to exhibit a unisexual mating system, unlike the many heterothallic species found in this genus (Wilson et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2018). More recent studies have revealed a diversity of mating systems in Huntiella spp., including those that are homothallic, heterothallic and unisexual (Wilson et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2018). Efforts are consequently being made to collect these fungi, providing a basis for future fungal genetics studies, but also, together with genomics data (Wingfield et al. 2016), to better understand their biology.

Huntiella species are most commonly found in tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world (Van Wyk et al. 2004, 2006, 2011; Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2012; De Errasti et al. 2015; Mbenoun et al. 2014, 2016; Liu et al. 2018). Twenty-nine species are currently recognised in the genus (Liu et al. 2018). These fungi are grouped in three well-supported genealogical lineages that correspond to geographic centres, where they appear to have radiated (Mbenoun et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2018). These include species in an African Clade known only from Africa, an Asian Clade distributed across Asia and an Indo-Pacific Clade found in Australia and Pacific Islands and some parts of Asia. However, the diversity of Huntiella in most regions, including especially Europe, North and South America, is largely unexplored.

The objective of this study was to identify two fungal isolates collected from Platanus orientalis L. in Greece and four isolates from Colophospermum mopane (Benth.) J. Léonard and Senegalia nigrescens (Oliv.) P. Hurter in South Africa. These fungi displayed typical culture characteristics of Huntiella spp., including rapid growth on agar medium, white fluffy mycelia when young, as well as the production of fruity aroma. Identification was accomplished, based on morphology and multigene phylogenies for the ITS, BT1 and TEF-1α gene regions. Furthermore, we considered the mating biology of these isolates in order to complement our taxonomic studies.

Materials and methods

Fungal isolations

Three South African Huntiella isolates were collected from fresh wounds of Colophospermum mopane in Kruger National Park in April 2009 and another one of the South African isolates was obtained from a broken branch of a Senegalia nigrescens tree damaged by elephants in Kruger National Park in June 2010. The isolates from Greece were obtained from the stump of a Platanus orientalis tree that was cut about two months before sampling, in a natural forest along the banks of the Spercheios River in Phthiotis Regional Unit during November 2018. Isolation from wood samples was performed using a trapping technique originally described by Grosclaude et al. (1988). This is a standard diagnostic protocol for the isolation of Ceratocystis platani (Walter) Engelbrecht & Harrington using freshly-cut twigs of P. orientalis as bait (OEPP/EPPO 2014).

Isolates from Greece were made by transferring ascospore masses from the tips of the ascomata on the surface of Platanus twig baits, formed on infected wood surface, to 2% malt extract agar (MEA: 20 g Biolab malt extract, 20 g Difco agar, 1 litre water), using a sterile needle under a dissection microscope (Carl Zeiss Co. Ltd., Oberkochen, Germany). The South African isolate was obtained by transferring mycelial strands from infected wood on to MEA. Primary isolations were incubated for 3–7 d at 25 °C. From these isolations, purified cultures from single hyphal tips were prepared for morphological characterisation, phylogenetic analyses and mating-type studies. All purified isolates were deposited in the culture collection (CMW) of the Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, South Africa and the living culture collection (PPRI) of the South African National Collection of Fungi (NCF), Roodeplaat, Pretoria, South Africa. The dried-down type specimens were deposited in the National Collection of Fungi (PREM), Roodeplaat, Pretoria, South Africa.

DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing

All the isolates obtained in this study were used for DNA sequence-based characterisation. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the mycelium of isolates grown on 2% MEA for 3–4 d at 25 °C, using Prepman Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols. Three gene regions were amplified for sequencing and phylogenetic analyses. These included the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) regions 1 and 2, including the 5.8S rRNA, a partial β-tubulin 1 gene (BT1) and a partial Translation Elongation factor-1α gene (TEF-1α), amplified using the set of primers as described by Liu et al. (2018).

A total volume of 25 μl PCR reaction mixture contained 1 μl of DNA template, 0.5 μl (10 pM) of each primer (Forward and Reverse), 5 μl MyTaq PCR buffer (Bioline GmbH, Germany) and 0.3 μl of MyTaq DNA Polymerase (Bioline GmbH, Germany). The PCR reactions were conducted using an Applied Biosystems ProFlex PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The PCR programme for amplification of the ITS, BT1 and TEF1-α gene regions was as follows: an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 56 °C and 60 s at 72 °C and a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. Amplified fragments were purified using ExoSAP-IT™ PCR Product Cleanup Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to remove excess primers and dNTPs. Amplicons were sequenced in both directions using an ABI PRISM™ 3100 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA) at the Sequencing Facility of the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Multi-gene phylogenetic analyses

The programme Geneious v. 7.0 was used to edit and assemble raw sequence reads into contigs (Kearse et al. 2012). Sequence data for representative type isolates of all described Huntiella spp. (except H. decorticans) were downloaded from GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The sequences were aligned using MAFFT v. 7 with an online FFT-NS-i strategy (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/; Katoh and Standley 2013) and confirmed visually. Sequences for the novel species discovered in this study were deposited in GenBank.

Single gene sequence datasets of the ITS, BT1 and TEF-1α and the combined dataset of the three gene regions were analysed using Maximum Likelihood (ML), Maximum Parsimony (MP) and Bayesian Inference (BI). The appropriate substitution model for each dataset was obtained using the software package jModeltest v. 2.1.5 (Posada 2008). The ML phylogenetic analyses were conducted using PhyML v. 3.0 (Guindon and Gascuel 2003). Confidence levels for the nodes were determined using 1000 bootstrap replicates. MP analyses were performed using PAUP v. 4.0b10 (Swofford 2003). Gaps were treated as a fifth character. BI analyses were conducted using MrBayes v. 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012) on the CIPRES Science Gateway v. 3.3. Four Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains were run from a random starting tree for five million generations and trees were sampled every 100 generations. Twenty-five percent of the trees sampled were discarded as burn-in and the remaining trees were used to construct 50% majority rule consensus trees. Ceratocystis cercfabiensis (isolate CMW 43029) was used as the outgroup taxon for all the phylogenetic analyses. The resulting trees were visualised using MEGA v. 7.

Microscopy, growth study and mating-type assignment

Morphological features were studied on the isolates grown on 2% MEA. The fruiting structures were initially mounted in water and this was later replaced with 85% lactic acid and in which measurements were made and images captured. Nikon microscopes (Eclipse Ni, SMZ 18, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) mounted with a camera (Nikon DS Ri-2) were used for all observations. Fifty measurements of each relevant microscopic structure were made when available and these are presented as minimum–maximum and average ± standard deviation.

A study of growth in culture was conducted at temperatures from 5–35 °C at 5 °C intervals on the 90 mm Petri dishes containing 2% MEA. A mycelial plug (5 mm diam.) taken from an actively-growing colony was placed at the centres of Petri dishes. Four replicates per isolate were used to study growth rate and the experiment was repeated once. Colony diameters were assessed by taking two measurements perpendicular to each other for all isolates daily and growth rates were calculated. Colony characteristics were described on the same medium used for the growth studies and colours were assessed using the colour charts of Rayner (1970).

The mating type (MAT) of the studied Huntiella spp. was determined, based on the results of the mating type PCR reactions (Wilson et al. 2015). Primers, to see which of the MAT genes, Oman_111_F and Oman_111_R were thus used to amplify a 335 bp fragment of the MAT1-1-1 gene and Om_Mo_121_F and Om_Mo_121_R to amplify a 572 bp fragment of the MAT1-2-1 gene, as described by Wilson et al. (2015).

Results

Fungal isolations

Six isolates resembling Huntiella spp. were included in this study. Two isolates had ascomata with long necks, conical spines on the ascomatal bases and hat-shaped ascospores and four isolates had only thielaviopsis-like asexual state (Van Wyk et al. 1991). Four isolates were collected from Colophospermum mopane and Senegalia nigrescens in the Kruger National Park of South Africa and two isolates were from Platanus orientalis in Greece. Ascomata resembling Huntiella spp. were observed on twig baits from P. orientalis samples from Greece and two isolates were obtained in pure culture. All isolates obtained in this study have been preserved in the culture collections described above (Table 1).

Table 1.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

List of Huntiella species included in this study.

Species^a	CMW No.^b	Other No.^b	GenBank accession No.^c			Hosts (or substrate)	Origin	Reference
Species^a	CMW No.^b	Other No.^b	ITS	BT1	TEF-1α	Hosts (or substrate)	Origin	Reference
Ceratocystis cercfabiensis	CMW 43029	CERC 2170;	KP727592	KP727618	KP727643	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2015
Ceratocystis cercfabiensis	CMW 43029	CBS 139654	KP727592	KP727618	KP727643	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2015
Huntiella ani	CMW 44684	CERC 2827;	MH118602	MH118635	MH118668	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
Huntiella ani	CMW 44684	CBS 143283	MH118602	MH118635	MH118668	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. ani	CMW 44686	CERC 2829;	MH118603	MH118636	MH118669	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. ani	CMW 44686	CBS 143282	MH118603	MH118636	MH118669	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. bellula	CMW 49312	CERC 2854;	MH118607	MH118640	MH118673	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. bellula	CMW 49312	CBS 143286	MH118607	MH118640	MH118673	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. bellula	CMW 49314	CERC 2862;	MH118610	MH118643	MH118676	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. bellula	CMW 49314	CBS 143285	MH118610	MH118643	MH118676	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. bhutanensis	CMW 8242	CBS 112907	AY528951	AY528956	AY528961	Picea spinulosa	Bhutan	Van Wyk et al. 2004
H. bhutanensis	CMW 8217	CBS 114289	AY528957	AY528962	AY528952	P. spinulosa	Bhutan	Van Wyk et al. 2004
H. ceramica	CMW 15245	CBS 122299	EU245022	EU244994	EU244926	Eucalyptus grandis	Malawi	Heath et al. 2009
H. ceramica	CMW 15248	CBS 122300	EU245024	EU244996	EU244928	E. grandis	Malawi	Heath et al. 2009
H. chinaeucensis	CMW 24658	CBS 127185	JQ862729	JQ862717	JQ862741	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Chen et al. 2013
H. chinaeucensis	CMW 24661	CBS 127186	JQ862731	JQ862719	JQ862743	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Chen et al. 2013
H. chlamydoformis	CMW 36932	CBS 131674	KF769087	KF769109	KF769098	Theobroma cacao	Cameroon	Mbenoun et al. 2016
H. chlamydoformis	CMW 37102	CBS 131675	KF769088	KF769110	KF769099	Terminalia superba	Cameroon	Mbenoun et al. 2016
H. confusa	CMW 43452	CERC 2158;	MH118583	MH118616	MH118649	Acacia confusa	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. confusa	CMW 43452	CBS 143577	MH118583	MH118616	MH118649	Acacia confusa	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. confusa	CMW 43453	CERC 2162;	MH118584	MH118617	MH118650	A. confusa	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. confusa	CMW 43453	CBS 143288	MH118584	MH118617	MH118650	A. confusa	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. cryptoformis	CMW 36826	CBS 131277	KC691462	KC691486	KC691510	Terminalia sericea	South Africa	Mbenoun et al. 2014
H. cryptoformis	CMW 36828	CBS 131279	KC691464	KC691488	KC691512	Ziziphus mucronata	South Africa	Mbenoun et al. 2014
H. decipiens	CMW 25918	CBS 129735	HQ203218	HQ203235	HQ236437	E. cloeziana	South Africa	Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2013
H. decipiens	CMW 25914	CBS 129737	HQ203219	HQ203236	HQ236438	E. maculata	South Africa	Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2013
H. eucalypti	CMW 44692	CERC 2840;	MH118605	MH118638	MH118671	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. eucalypti	CMW 44692	CBS 143291	MH118605	MH118638	MH118671	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. eucalypti	CMW 44693	CERC 2841;	MH118606	MH118639	MH118672	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. eucalypti	CMW 44693	CBS 143290	MH118606	MH118639	MH118672	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. fabiensis	CMW 49307	CERC 2753;	MH118596	MH118629	MH118662	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. fabiensis	CMW 49307	CBS 143294	MH118596	MH118629	MH118662	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. fabiensis	CMW 49309	CERC 2763;	MH118599	MH118632	MH118665	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. fabiensis	CMW 49309	CBS143292	MH118599	MH118632	MH118665	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. fecunda	CMW 49302	CERC 2449;	MH118586	MH118619	MH118652	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. fecunda	CMW 49302	CBS 143296	MH118586	MH118619	MH118652	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. fecunda	CMW 49303	CERC 2451a;	MH118587	MH118620	MH118653	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. fecunda	CMW 49303	CBS 143295	MH118587	MH118620	MH118653	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. glaber	CMW 43436	CERC 2132;	MH118580	MH118613	MH118646	E. exserta	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. glaber	CMW 43436	CBS 143298	MH118580	MH118613	MH118646	E. exserta	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. glaber	CMW 49299	CERC 2133;	MH118581	MH118614	MH118647	E. exserta	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. glaber	CMW 49299	CBS 143297	MH118581	MH118614	MH118647	E. exserta	China	Liu et al. 2018
*H. hellenica*	CMW 54800	PPRI 27982	MT524073	MT513125	MT513131	*Platanus orientalis*	Greece	Present study
*H. hellenica*	CMW 54801	PPRI 27983	MT524072	MT513124	MT513130	*P. orientalis*	Greece	Present study
H. inaequabilis	CMW 44372	CERC 2740;	MH118590	MH118623	MH118656	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. inaequabilis	CMW 44372	CBS 143300	MH118590	MH118623	MH118656	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. inaequabilis	CMW 49306	CERC 2749;	MH118595	MH118628	MH118661	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. inaequabilis	CMW 49306	CBS 143299	MH118595	MH118628	MH118661	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. inquinana	CMW 21106		EU588587	EU588666	EU588674	Acacia mangium	Indonesia	Tarigan et al. 2010
H. inquinana	CMW 21107	CBS 124009	EU588588	EU588667	EU588675	A. mangium	Indonesia	Tarigan et al. 2010
*H. krugeri*	CMW 36849	CBS 131676 PPRI 27952	MT524068	MT513120	MT513126	*A. nigrescens*	South Africa	Present study
*H. krugeri*	CMW 55933		MT524069	MT513121	MT513127	*Colophospermum mopane*	South Africa	Present study
*H. krugeri*	CMW 55934		MT524070	MT513122	MT513128	*C. mopane*	South Africa	Present study
*H. krugeri*	CMW 55935		MT524071	MT513123	MT513129	*C. mopane*	South Africa	Present study
H. meiensis	CMW 44374	CERC 2742;	MH118591	MH118624	MH118657	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. meiensis	CMW 44374	CBS 143302	MH118591	MH118624	MH118657	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. meiensis	CMW 44376	CERC 2746;	MH118594	MH118627	MH118660	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. meiensis	CMW 44376	CBS 143301	MH118594	MH118627	MH118660	Eucalyptus sp.	China	Liu et al. 2018
H. microbasis	CMW 21117	CBS 124013	EU588593	EU588672	EU588680	A. mangium	Indonesia	Tarigan et al. 2010
H. microbasis	CMW 21115	CBS 124015	EU588592	EU588671	EU588679	A. mangium	Indonesia	Tarigan et al. 2010
H. moniliformis	CMW 9590	CBS 116452	AY431101	AY528985	AY529006	E. grandis	South Africa	Van Wyk et al. 2006
H. moniliformis	CMW 4114	CBS 118151	AY528997	AY528986	AY529007	Shizolobium parahyba	Ecuador	Van Wyk et al. 2006
H. moniliformopsis	CMW 9986	CBS 109441	AY528998	AY528987	AY529008	E. obliqua	Australia	Yuan & Mohammed 2002
H. moniliformopsis	CMW 10214	CBS 115792	AY528999	AY528988	AY529009	E. sieberi	Australia	Yuan & Mohammed 2002
H. oblonga	CMW 23803	CBS 122291	EU245019	EU244991	EU244951	A. mearnsii	South Africa	Heath et al. 2009
H. oblonga	CMW 23802		EU245020	EU244992	EU244952	A. mearnsii	South Africa	Heath et al. 2009
H. omanensis	CMW 11048	CBS 115787	DQ074742	DQ074732	DQ074737	Mangifera indica	Oman	Al-subhi et al. 2006
H. omanensis	CMW 3800	CBS 117839	DQ074743	DQ074733	DQ074738	M. indica	Oman	Al-subhi et al. 2006
H. pycnanthi	CMW 36916	CBS 131672	KF769096	KF769118	KF769107	The. cacao	Cameroon	Mbenoun et al. 2016
H. pycnanthi	CMW 36910		KF769095	KF769117	KF769106	The. cacao	Cameroon	Mbenoun et al. 2016
H. salinaria	CMW 25911	CBS 129733	HQ203213	HQ203230	HQ236432	E. maculata	South Africa	Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2013
H. salinaria	CMW 30703	CBS 129734	HQ203214	HQ203231	HQ236433	E. saligna	South Africa	Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2013
H. savannae	CMW 17300	CBS 121151	EF408551	EF408565	EF408572	A. nigrescens	South Africa	Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2008
H. savannae	CMW 17297		EF408552	EF408566	EF408573	Combretum zeyheri	South Africa	Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2008
H. sublaevis	CMW 22449	CBS 122517	FJ151431	FJ151465	FJ151487	Terminalia ivorensis	Ecuador	Van Wyk et al. 2011
H. sublaevis	CMW 22444	CBS 122518	FJ151430	FJ151464	FJ151486	T. ivorensis	Ecuador	Van Wyk et al. 2011
H. sumatrana	CMW 21109	CBS 124011	EU588589	EU588668	EU588676	A. mangium	Indonesia	Tarigan et al. 2010
H. sumatrana	CMW 21111	CBS 124012	EU588590	EU588669	EU588677	A. mangium	Indonesia	Tarigan et al. 2010
H. tribiliformis	CMW 13011	CBS 115867	AY528991	AY529001	AY529012	Pinus merkusii	Indonesia	Van Wyk et al. 2006
H. tribiliformis	CMW 13012	CBS 118242	AY528992	AY529002	AY529013	P. merkusii	Indonesia	Van Wyk et al. 2006
H. tyalla	CMW 28917		HM071899	HM071909	HQ236448	E. grandis	Australia	Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2012
H. tyalla	CMW 28920		HM071896	HM071910	HQ236449	E. grandis	Australia	Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2012

^a Species indicated in bold are newly described in this study. ^b CBS = Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; CERC = Culture collection of China Eucalypt Research Centre (CERC), Chinese Academy of Forestry (CAF), ZhanJiang, GuangDong Province, China; CMW = Culture collection of the Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; PPRI = The living culture collection (PPRI) of the South African National Collection of Fungi (NCF), Roodeplaat, Pretoria, South Africa. ^c GenBank accession numbers indicated in bold are generated in this study.

Multi-gene phylogenetic analyses

All six isolates, included in this study, were successfully sequenced at all three selected gene regions for phylogenetic analyses, resulting in DNA sequence data of approximately 614, 574 and 830 bp for the ITS, BT1 and TEF-1α gene regions, respectively. These newly-generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1). Comparisons with reference sequences of previously-described Huntiella spp. produced a concatenated sequence alignment which was deposited in TreeBASE (no. 26341).

The three tree topologies resulting from ML, MP and BI were concordant and showed similar phylogenetic relationships amongst taxa (Fig. 1, Suppl. materials 1–3: Figs S1–S3). Based on the phylogenetic analyses of the BT1 (Suppl. materil 2, Fig. S2), TEF-1α (Suppl. material 3: Fig. S3) and the combined gene regions (Fig. 1), the six isolates clustered in two well-supported clades, clearly separated from each other and from previously described Huntiella spp. The ITS tree (Suppl. material 1: Fig. S1) provided a poor resolution to separate the species. All the isolates grouped in the African Clade of Huntiella spp. (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

ML tree of Huntiella species generated from the combined DNA sequence data of ITS, BT1 and TEF-1α DNA. Sequences generated from this study are printed in bold type. Bold branches indicate posterior probabilities values ≥ 0.9. Bootstrap values and posterior probabilities values are presented above branches as ML/MP/BI. Bootstrap value < 50% or probabilities values < 0.9 are marked with *. Nodes lacking the support value are marked with -. Ceratocystis cercfabiensis (CMW 43029) represents the outgroup.

Taxonomy

Huntiella hellenica F.F. Liu. Marinc. & M.J. Wingf., sp. nov.

MycoBank No: MycoBank No: 835637

Fig. 2

Etymology

The name refers to the country, Greece where this fungus was collected.

Mating strategy

Homothallic, with sexually complementary isolates having both the MAT1-1-1 and MAT1-2-1 genes.

Sexual state. Ascomata produced in 2% MEA in a week, perithecial; ascomatal bases mostly embedded in thick or loose mycelial mat, globose to ellipsoidal or obpyriform, pale brown when young, becoming dark brown with age, 173–377 µm long (avg. 238.8 µm), 157–493 µm wide (avg. 218.2 µm), ornamented with spine-like structures, dark brown, conical, 12–29 µm long, 4–9 µm wide at base becoming attenuated; ostiolar necks upright, straight, occasionally situated at off-centre of base, darker than base when young, 344–616 µm long (avg. 515.5 µm), 34–60 µm wide (avg. 46.6 µm) at base, gradually tapering towards apex; ostiolar hyphae hyaline, straight to divergent, 15–39 µm long, 1–3 µm wide, tapering towards apex. Asci evanescent. Ascospores hyaline, subglobose, aseptate, covered with sheath giving a hat-like feature in side view, 4–5.5 × 3–4.5 µm (5 ± 0.23 × 4 ± 0.28 µm) excluding sheath.

Asexual state. Thielaviopsis-like Conidiophores macronematous, simple or branched; when branched radiating from basal cell once, often reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenus cells endoblastic, hyaline, varying from lageniform to cylindrical depending spore shape; in case of thick barrel-shaped conidia, apex often becoming wider than base. Conidia hyaline, 1-celled, in two recognisable shapes; majority ellipsoidal to barrel-shaped (side swollen, ends round), typical fat barrel-shaped 5–8 × 4.5–7.5 µm (5.9 ± 0.61 × 5.3 ± 0.55 µm), width of some barrel-shaped ranging 2.5–4 µm wide; rectangular-shaped (side straight, ends truncated), not commonly found, 5–9 × 1–3 µm (6.9 ± 1.18 × 2.3 ± 0.38 µm). Aleurioconidia not observed.

Culture characteristics

Cultures on 2% MEA in dark in 8 d showing circular growth with even edge, mycelium flat, superficial, medium dense and texture becoming pelt-like with age, colour above not uniform, salmon (11f’) to ochreous (15b’) with inner half irregularly umber (13m), below ochreous (15b’) with inner half irregularly umber (13i’) at centre. Optimum growth temperatures at 30 °C at 9.6 mm/d, followed by at 25 °C (7.6 mm/d), 35 °C (7.2 mm/d), 20 °C (4.7 mm/d), 15 °C (3.2 mm/d), 10 °C (1.1 mm/d) and 5 °C (0.2 mm/d).

Specimens examined

Greece, Phthiotis, near the village Kastri, occurring on freshly-cut stumps of Platanus orientalis in a natural forest along the banks of the Spercheios River, Nov. 2018, P. Tsopelas & N. Soulioti, PREM 62889, holotype (dried culture of CMW 54800), culture ex-holotype CMW 54800 = PPRI 27982, other cultures CMW 54801 = PPRI 27983.

Figure 2.

Micrographs of Huntiella hellenica sp. nov. (ex-holotype CMW 54800 = PPRI 27982) A culture grown on 2% MEA at 30 °C (optimum growth temperature) in the dark for 34 d B, C colony with ascomatal base embedded in mycelia with ascospore mass at the tip of ostiolar neck D–F young ascoma showing development of ostiolar neck and less-pigmented base G, H mature ascoma ornamented with spines I close-up of ascomatal wall showing spines J–L close up of ornament (spin-like) M, N Ostiolar hyphae O Ascospores P Ascospores covered with sheath appearing like a hat Q, R Germinating ascospores S Lageniform conidiogenous cell T Cylindrical-shape conidiogenous cell U Conidia in various shapes from diverse barrel-shaped to rectangular-shaped V rectangular-shaped conidia W chains of conidia. Scale bars: 1 mm (B, C); 50 µm (D–H); 10 µm (I–W).

Notes

The sexual state of H. hellenica developed at temperatures over 25 °C. Cultures incubated at 20 °C and below produced only the asexual state. Huntiella hellenica is closely related to H. savannae (Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2008), H. pycnanthi (Mbenoun et al. 2016) and H. krugeri. It can, however, be distinguished from these two species by the dimensions of ascomatal necks and barrel-shaped conidia and growth rate. Huntiella hellenica produced shorter (average 515.5 μm long) ascomatal necks than H. savannae (average 579 μm long) and H. pycnanthi (average 673 μm long). Huntiella hellenica had larger (average 6.9 × 2.3 μm) barrel-shaped conidia than H. savannae (average 4.8 × 3 μm) and H. pycnanthi (average 6 × 3 μm). Optimal temperature for growth of H. hellenica was 30 °C, similar to H. savannae and H. pycnanthi, but H. hellenica differed from H. pycnanthi in growing minimally at 10 °C and below.

Huntiella krugeri F.F. Liu. Marinc. & M.J. Wingf., sp. nov.

MycoBank No: MycoBank No: 835638

Fig. 3

Etymology

The name refers to the Kruger National Park in South Africa, where this fungus was collected.

Mating strategy

Heterothallic with isolates having either a MAT1-1-1 gene or a MAT1-2-1 gene.

Sexual state. Not observed.

Asexual state . Produced on 2% MEA in 3 weeks. Thielaviopsis-like. Conidiophores macronematous, upright, simple or branched in one tier, 29–37 µm in length, often reduced to conidiogenous cells; Conidiogenous cells enteroblastic, lageniform, 10–20 µm long, 1.5–3 µm wide, tapering towards apex. Conidia hyaline, rectangular-shaped, usually straight, with top-end conidium often club-shaped, 4–11 × 1–2 µm (avg. 6.2 × 1.7 µm). Aleurioconidia hyaline, holoblastic, mostly terminal, ellipsoidal to subglobose with an extended tube-like base, club-shaped, 4–7 × 2–3 µm (5.6 ± 0.76 × 2.5 ± 0.24 µm).

Figure 3.

Micrographs of Huntiella krugeri sp. nov. (ex-holotype CMW 36849 = CBS 131676 = PPRI 27952). A Culture grown on 2% MEA in the dark for 34 d B, C Conidiogenous cell D Conidia in various shapes E Chain of conidia in different shapes F Chain of rectangular-shaped conidia with top-end of club-shaped G, H Aleurioconidia. Scale bars: 10 µm (B–H).

Culture characteristics

Cultures on 2% MEA in dark in 8 d showing circular growth with even edge, mycelium superficial, flat, dense, colour above uniformly white, below luteous (19). Optimum growth temperatures were at 30 °C at 9 mm/d, followed by at 25 °C (8.2 mm/d), 35 °C (6.2 mm/d), 20 °C (6 mm/d), 15 °C (3.4 mm/d), 10 °C (0.9 mm/d) and 5 °C (0.3 mm/d).

Specimens examined

South Africa, Mpumalanga, Kruger National Park, Satara rest camp, Senegalia nigrescens, June 2010, M. Mbenoun, PREM 62883, holotype (dried culture of CMW 36849), culture ex-holotype CMW 36849 = CBS 131676 = PPRI 27952.

Other cultures

South Africa, Mpumalanga, Kruger National Park, Punda Maria, Colophospermum mopane, April 2009, M. Mbenoun, CMW 55933, CMW 55934, CMW 55935.

Notes

Huntiella krugeri is closely related to H. hellenica described in the present study, H. cryptoformis (Mbenoun et al. 2014) and H. savannae (Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2008). Due to its heterothallic nature, H. krugeri produced only the asexual state in this study. The bacilliform conidia of H. krugeri (average 6.2 × 1.7 μm) were longer than those of H. hellenica (average 5.9 × 5.3 μm) and H. cryptoformis (average 5.5 × 2.5 μm). In addition, H. krugeri produced hyaline aleurioconidia, which are absent in other closely-related species in the genus.

Discussion

This study led to the discovery of two novel Huntiella species isolated from Platanus orientalis in Greece, Colophospermum mopane and Senegalia nigrescens in the Kruger National Park of South Africa. These two species, provided with the name H. hellenica and H. krugeri, respectively, were shown to reside in the African Clade of Huntiella (Mbenoun et al. 2014; Liu et al. 2018). The identity of H. hellenica and H. krugeri emerged from a phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequence data for three gene regions (ITS, BT1 and TEF-1α), as well as their distinct morphological characteristics. Mating studies showed that Huntiella hellenica and H. krugeri were homothallic and heterothallic, respectively. All indications were that these two species are saprobes that grow on the freshly-exposed surfaces of trees.

The stump of P. orientalis, from which H. hellenica emerged, was sampled approximately two months after tree felling and it was also infected by the pathogen Ceratocystis platani, which causes a devastating disease in natural stands of P. orientalis in Greece. Colonszation of the stump with H. hellenica could have occurred on the freshly-cut surface with a contaminated tool as occurs for C. platani (Tsopelas et al. 2017) or was transferred by insect vectors.

The novel species described in this study showed typical characteristics of Huntiella spp. They grew rapidly in culture; their mycelium was white when young and turned dark with age. The one species that displayed a sexual state - H. hellenica, produced hat-shaped ascospores and had short conical spines on the ascomatal bases. Temperature is known to influence the ability of Huntiella spp. to produce a sexual state (Wilson et al. 2015) and this was also true for H. hellenica, which did not produce acomata below 25 °C.

Comparison of DNA sequence data for multiple gene regions is essential when seeking to identify species in Huntiella (Mbenoun et al. 2014; Liu et al. 2018). The three gene regions, selected for this purpose, have been used in previous studies showing that they can be collectively used to delineate species boundaries in the genus (Van Wyk et al. 2004, 2006, 2011; Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2012; Mbenoun et al. 2014, 2016; De Errasti et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2018). However, analyses of individual gene regions revealed different levels of resolution, consistent with the results of previous studies on this group of fungi (Mbenoun et al. 2014; Liu et al. 2018). Thus protein coding genes, in this case BT1 and TEF-1α, provided the best resolution for species identification of Huntiella, while ITS sequences provided little information or no support.

Primers, developed to identify the mating type idiomorphs in Huntiella spp. (Wilson et al. 2015), were effective for this purpose in the present study. The results showed that H. hellenica has both mating-type idiomorphs and this explains the presence of sexual structures in all isolates derived from single hyphal tips. In contrast, the isolate of H. krugeri contained one mating gene and is clearly a heterothallic species of Huntiella, also consistent with the fact that the isolate produced only an asexual state. This result is also consistent with those of Liu et al. (2018) who showed that closely-related Huntiella spp. can have different mating strategies. Collectively, Huntiella spp. have a remarkable range of mating strategies, including homothallic and heterothallic species, as well as those exhibiting unisexuality (Wilson et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2018). The new species described here will contribute to future studies considering the evolution of mating in Huntiella.

The two new species of Huntiella, discovered in this study, bring the total number of species in the genus to 31. These are found in many different regions of the world and on a wide variety of woody substrates (Van Wyk et al. 2004, 2006, 2011; Kamgan Nkuekam et al. 2012; De Beer et al. 2014; Mbenoun et al. 2014, 2016; De Errasti et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2018). The renewed interest that these fungi have received during the course of the past decade has revealed unexpected complexity in their ecological interactions (Mbenoun et al. unpublished data), evolutionary history (Mbenoun et al. 2014; Liu et al. 2018) and reproductive biology (Wilson et al. 2015). The description of novel taxa, as reported in this study and the growing accessibility of whole genome sequencing (Wingfield et al. 2016), should enable new avenues of research that will contribute to a considerably better understanding of Huntiella species in the future.

Acknowledgements

This study was initiated through the bilateral agreement between the Governments of South Africa and China and supported by The National Key R&D Program of China (China-South Africa Forestry Joint Research Centre Project; project No. 2018YFE0120900), the National Ten-thousand Talents Program (Project No. W03070115) and the GuangDong Top Young Talents Program (Project No. 20171172). We acknowledge members of Tree Protection and Cooperation Programme (TPCP) and the National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa for financial support.

References

Al-Subhi AM, Al-Adawi AO, Van Wyk M, Deadman ML, Wingfield MJ (2006) Ceratocystis omanensis, a new species from diseased mango trees in Oman. Mycological Research 110: 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2005.08.007

Chen SF, Van Wyk M, Roux J, Wingfield MJ, Xie YJ, Zhou XD (2013) Taxonomy and pathogenicity of Ceratocystis species on Eucalyptus trees in South China, including C. chinaeucensis sp. nov. Fungal Diversity 58: 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-012-0214-5

Cristobal BD, Hansen AJ (1962) Un hongo semjante a Ceratocystis moniliformis en cacao en Costa Rica. Turrialba 12: 46–47.

Davidson RW (1935) Fungi causing stain in logs and lumber in the southern states, including five new species. Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 789–807.

De Beer ZW, Duong T, Barnes I, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ (2014) Redefining Ceratocystis and allied genera. Studies in Mycology 79: 187–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2014.10.001

De Beer ZW, Marincowitz S, Duong TA, Wingfield MJ (2017) Bretziella, a new genus to accommodate the oak wilt fungus, Ceratocystis fagacearum (Microascales, Ascomycota). MycoKeys 27: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.27.20657

De Errasti A, De Beer ZW, Rajchenberg M, Coetzee MPA, Wingfield MJ, Roux J (2015) Huntiella decorticans sp. nov. (Ceratocystidaceae) associated with dying Nothofagus in Patagonia. Mycologia 107: 512–521. https://doi.org/10.3852/14-175

Grosclaude C, Olivier R, Pizzuto J-C, Romiti C, Madec S (1988) Détection par piégeage du Ceratocystis fimbriata f. platani. Application à l’étude de la persistance du parasite dans du bois infecté. European Journal of Forest Pathology 18: 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1988.tb00226.x

Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150390235520

Harrington TC (2004) CABI crop protection compendium. CABI Publishing. http://www.public. iastate.edu/~tcharrin/cabinfo.html

Heath RN, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD, Meke G, Mbaga A, Roux J (2009) Ceratocystis species on Acacia mearnsii and Eucalyptus spp. in eastern and southern Africa including six new species. Fungal Diversity 34: 41–67.

Hedgcock GG (1906) Studies upon some chromogenic fungi which discolor wood. Missouri Botanical Garden Annual Report 17: 59–124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2400089

Kamgan Nkuekam G, Jacobs K, De Beer ZW, Wingfield MJ, Roux J (2008) Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma species including three new taxa, associated with wounds on native South African trees. Fungal Diversity 29: 37–59.

Kamgan Nkuekam G, Wingfield MJ, Mohammed C, Carnegie AJ, Pegg GS, Roux J (2012) Ceratocystis species, including two new species associated with nitidulid beetles, on eucalypts in Australia. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 101: 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-011-9625-7

Kamgan Nkuekam G, Wingfield MJ, Roux J (2013) Ceratocystis species, including two new taxa, from Eucalyptus trees in South Africa. Australasian Plant Pathology 42: 283–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-012-0192-9

Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010

Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199

Kile G (1993) Plant diseases caused by species of Ceratocystis sensu stricto and Chalara. Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: taxonomy, ecology and pathogenicity, 173–183.

Liu FF, Mbenoun M, Barnes I, Roux J, Wingfield MJ, Li GQ, Li JQ, Chen SF (2015) New Ceratocystis species from Eucalyptus and Cunninghamia in South China. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 107: 1451–1473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-015-0441-3

Liu FF, Li GQ, Roux J, Barnes I, Wilson AM, Wingfield MJ, Chen SF (2018) Nine novel species of Huntiella from southern China with three distinct mating strategies and variable levels of pathogenicity. Mycologia 110: 1145–1171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2018.1515450

Mayers CG, McNew DL, Harrington TC, Roeper RA, Fraedrich SW, Biedermann PH, Castrillo LA, Reed SE (2015) Three genera in the Ceratocystidaceae are the respective symbionts of three independent lineages of ambrosia beetles with large, complex mycangia. Fungal Biology 119: 1075–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2015.08.002

Mayers CG, Harrington TC, Masuya H, Jordal BH, McNew DL, Shih H-H, Roets F, Kietzka GJ (2020) Patterns of coevolution between ambrosia beetle mycangia and the Ceratocystidaceae, with five new fungal genera and seven new species. Persoonia 44: 41–66. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2020.44.02

Mbenoun M, Wingfield MJ, Begoude Boyogueno AD, Wingfield BD, Roux J (2014) Molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal three new Ceratocystis species and provide evidence for geographic differentiation of the genus in Africa. Mycological Progress 13: 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-013-0907-5

Mbenoun M, Wingfield MJ, Begoude Boyogueno AD, Nsouga AF, Petchayo TS, Mfegue CV, Dibog L, Nyassé S, Wingfield BD, Roux J (2016) Diversity and pathogenicity of the Ceratocystidaceae associated with cacao agroforests in Cameroon. Plant Pathology 65: 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12400

Mbenoun M, Garnas JR, Wingfield MJ, Begoude Boyogueno AD, Roux J (2017) Metacommunity analyses of Ceratocystidaceae fungi across heterogeneous African savanna landscapes. Fungal Ecology 28: 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2016.09.007

Moreau C (1952) Coexistence des formes Thielaviopsis et Graphium chez une souche de Ceratocystis major (van Beyma) nov. comb. Remarques sur les variations des Ceratocystis. Revue de Mycologie (Supplément Colonial No. 1) 12: 17–25.

Nel WJ, Duong TA, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ, De Beer ZW (2018) A new genus and species for the globally important, multi-host root pathogen Thielaviopsis basicola. Plant Pathology 67: 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12803

OEPP/EPPO (2014) PM 7/98 (2) Specific requirements for laboratories preparing accreditation for a plant pest diagnostic activity. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization Bulletin – OEPP/EPPO Bullettin 44: 117–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12118

Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1253–1256. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msn083

Rayner RW (1970) A mycological colour chart. Commonwealth Mycological Institute Kew, Surrey and British Mycological Society.

Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029

Roux J, Wingfield MJ (2009) Ceratocystis species: emerging pathogens of non-native plantation Eucalyptus and Acacia species. Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science 71: 115–120. https://doi.org/10.2989/SF.2009.71.2.5.820

Swofford DL (2003) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.

Tarigan M, Van Wyk M, Roux J, Tjahjono B, Wingfield MJ (2010) Three new Ceratocystis spp. in the Ceratocystis moniliformis complex from wounds on Acacia mangium and A. crassicarpa. Mycoscience 51: 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10267-009-0003-5

Tsopelas P, Santini A, Wingfield MJ, De Beer ZW (2017) Canker stain: a lethal disease destroying iconic plane trees. Plant Disease 101: 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-16-1235-FE

Van Wyk M, Roux J, Barnes I, Wingfield BD, Chhetri DB, Kirisits T, Wingfield MJ (2004) Ceratocystis bhutanensis sp. nov., associated with the bark beetle Ips schmutzenhoferi on Picea spinulosa in Bhutan. Studies in Mycology 50: 365–379.

Van Wyk M, Roux J, Barnes I, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ (2006) Molecular phylogeny of the Ceratocystis moniliformis complex and description of C. tribilliformis sp. nov. Fungal Diversity 21: 181–201.

Van Wyk M, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ (2011) Four new Ceratocystis spp. associated with wounds on Eucalyptus, Schizolobium and Terminalia trees in Ecuador. Fungal Diversity 46: 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-010-0051-3

Van Wyk PWJ, Wingfield MJ, Van Wyk PS (1991) Ascospore development in Ceratocystis moniliformis. Mycological Research 95: 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)81365-8

Von Schrenk H (1903) The “bluing” and the “red-hot” of the western yellow pine, with special reference to the Black Hills Forest Reserve. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Bureau of Plant Industry Bulletin 36: 1–46. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.65090

Wilson AM, Godlonton T, Van der Nest MA, Wilken PM, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD (2015) Unisexual reproduction in Huntiella moniliformis. Fungal Genetics and Biology 80: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2015.04.008

Wingfield BD, Van Wyk M, Roos H, Wingfield M (2013) Ceratocystis: emerging evidence for discrete generic boundaries. In. The ophiostomatoid fungi: expanding frontiers, 57–64.

Wingfield BD, Duong TA, Hammerbacher A, van der Nest MA, Wilson A, Chang R, de Beer ZW, Steenkamp ET, Wilken PM, Naidoo K, Wingfield MJ (2016) IMA Genome-F 7 Draft genome sequences for Ceratocystis fagacearum, C. harringtonii, Grosmannia penicillata, and Huntiella bhutanensis. IMA Fungus 7: 317–323. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2016.07.02.11

Yuan ZQ, Mohammed C (2002) Ceratocystis moniliformopsis sp. nov., an early colonizer of Eucalyptus obliqua logs in Tasmania, Australia. Australian Systematic Botany 15: 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1071/SB00024

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1

Figure S1. ML tree of Huntiella species generated from the ITS DNA sequence data

FeiFei Liu, Seonju Marincowitz, ShuaiFei Chen, Michael Mbenoun, Panaghiotis Tsopelas, Nikoleta Soulioti, Michael J. Wingfield

Data type: phylogenetic tree

Explanation note: Sequences generated from this study are printed in bold type. Bold branches indicate posterior probabilities values ≥ 0.9. Bootstrap values and posterior probabilities value are presented above branches as ML/MP/BI. Bootstrap value < 50% or probabilities values < 0.9 are marked with *. Nodes lacking the support value are marked with -. Ceratocystis cercfabiensis (CMW 43029) represents the outgroup.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Download file (56.15 kb)

Supplementary material 2

Figure S2. ML tree of Huntiella species generated from the BT1 DNA sequence data

FeiFei Liu, Seonju Marincowitz, ShuaiFei Chen, Michael Mbenoun, Panaghiotis Tsopelas, Nikoleta Soulioti, Michael J. Wingfield

Data type: phylogenetic tree

Explanation note: Sequences generated from this study are printed in bold type. Bold branches indicate posterior probabilities values ≥ 0.9. Bootstrap values and posterior probabilities values are presented above branches as ML/MP/BI. Bootstrap value < 50% or probabilities values < 0.9 are marked with *. Nodes lacking the support value are marked with -. Ceratocystis cercfabiensis (CMW 43029) represents the outgroup.

Download file (61.14 kb)

Supplementary material 3

Figure S3. ML tree of Huntiella species generated from the TEF-1α DNA sequence data

FeiFei Liu, Seonju Marincowitz, ShuaiFei Chen, Michael Mbenoun, Panaghiotis Tsopelas, Nikoleta Soulioti, Michael J. Wingfield

Data type: phylogenetic tree

Explanation note: Sequences generated from this study are printed in bold type. Bold branches indicate posterior probabilities values ≥ 0.9. Bootstrap values and posterior probabilities values are presented above branches as ML/MP/BI. Bootstrap value < 50% or probabilities values < 0.9 are marked with *. Nodes lacking the support value are marked with -. Ceratocystis cercfabiensis (CMW 43029) represents the outgroup.

Download file (64.26 kb)