Short Communication
Short Communication
Evidence for further non-coding RNA genes in the fungal rDNA region
expand article infoMagnus Alm Rosenblad, Ellen Larsson, Arttapon Walker§, Naritsada Thongklang§, Christian Wurzbacher|, R. Henrik Nilsson
‡ University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
§ Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand
| Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Open Access


Non-coding RNA (ncRNA) genes play important, but incompletely understood, roles in various cellular processes, notably translation and gene regulation. A recent report on the detection of the ncRNA Signal Recognition Particle gene in the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region of several species of three genera of ectomycorrhizal basidiomycetes prompted a more thorough bioinformatics search for additional ncRNA genes in the full fungal ribosomal operon. This study reports on the detection of three ncRNA genes hitherto not known from the fungal ribosomal region: nuclear RNase P RNA, RNase MRP RNA, and a possible snoRNA U14 in a total of five species of Auricularia and Inocybe. We verified their presence through resequencing of independent specimens. Two completed Auricularia genomes were found to lack these ncRNAs elsewhere than in the ribosomal operon, suggesting that these are functional genes. It seems clear that ncRNA genes play a larger role in fungal ribosomal genetics than hitherto thought.


Basidiomycetes, IGS, ITS, MRP, non-coding RNA, RNase MRP, RNase P, SRP


Non-coding RNA (ncRNA) are stretches of RNA – typically thought of as genes – that are not translated into proteins through translation. A range of functions has been ascribed to the various groups of ncRNAs known to date, including important roles in translation, gene regulation, and chromosome inactivation (Cech and Steitz 2014). The number of ncRNA genes in the human genome alone is believed to run in the thousands, although relatively few have been characterised to any satisfactory level (Li and Liu 2019). Knowledge of ncRNAs in fungal genomes is rudimentary by comparison, but ncRNAs appear to play important cellular roles in the relatively few fungi examined to date (Li et al. 2021). The ncRNAs identified in the present study are, with few exceptions, all ubiquitous in eukaryotes and there are as yet no examples of them missing in fungi. They play important roles in tRNA processing (RNase P RNA), rRNA maturation (RNase MRP RNA), and ER targeting of proteins (SRP RNA), and they constitute the RNA component of the respective ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particles (López et al. 2009; Akopian et al. 2013).

Alm Rosenblad et al. (2016) unexpectedly found sequence analysis-derived evidence of the ncRNA Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) RNAs in the nuclear ribosomal ITS1 region of 11 species in three ectomycorrhizal genera of the Basidiomycota: Astraeus, Russula, and Lactarius. Indirect evidence furthermore suggested that these SRP RNAs could be functional. Queries in the GenBank (Sayers et al. 2021) and UNITE (Nilsson et al. 2019; Abarenkov et al. 2022) databases failed to produce any other fungi with SRP RNA in their ITS region, raising questions as to why such a rare genetic element would have been gained several times independently in the ITS1 region of a set of three relatively closely related genera.

The recent trend of employing various high-throughput sequencing technologies to generate longer stretches of the fungal ribosomal operon than just the ITS region (Wurzbacher et al. 2019) offers a possibility to extend the search for fungal ncRNAs beyond the ITS region. The present study reports on a broadening of the search of Alm Rosenblad et al. (2016) to include a wider selection of ncRNAs and to cover the full nuclear ribosomal operon. We recovered and verified three to four different ncRNAs from the ribosomal intergenic spacer 1 (IGS1) region of a set of Auricularia and Inocybe species, and we submit that ncRNAs are elements that can no longer be disregarded in the context of fungal ribosomal biology.

Materials and methods

Sequence query

Since ncRNAs are conserved primarily on the secondary structure level rather than the primary sequence level, we queried GenBank for fungal ribosomal ncRNAs using the secondary structure covariance models from the Rfam database (Nawrocki et al. 2014) and Dumesic et al. (2015) through the cmsearch and cmscan commands of the INFERNAL v1.1 package (Nawrocki and Eddy 2013). As a part of an ongoing phylogenetic study of the basidiomycete genus Inocybe, we also sequenced the full ribosomal operon of four Inocybe species: Inocybe cincinnata, Inocybe flocculosa, Inocybe leiocephala, and Inocybe phaeocystidiosa. We queried these, too, for any new ncRNAs. We considered only highly significant matches that passed the Rfam E-value threshold applied for each gene. We then double-checked all matches by detailed manual examination of all conserved motifs as well as the secondary structure to filter out any partial or spurious candidates.

Verification of ncRNA matches

After quality control filtering, our GenBank query produced more than 30 highly significant ncRNA matches belonging to four different ncRNA genes in the IGS1 region of several Auricularia species from Li et al. (2011). Attempts at locating the underlying fungal specimens through the publication were unsuccessful. However, other Asian specimens from the same and related species were located in the Mae Fah Luang University herbarium (Table 1). To rule out sequencing or assembly error by the initial sequence authors, we thus ordered and sequenced those specimens for the full ribosomal operon.

We targeted two species of Auricularia and four species of Inocybe for sequencing of the full ribosomal operon. The fungal DNA was extracted using a DNA plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) and subsequently amplified using the primers NS1rc and RCA95rc or Fun-rOP-F/Fun-rOP-R as detailed in Wurzbacher et al. (2019). Briefly, the long-range PCR was performed using the PrimeStar GLX polymerase (Takara) with a 2.5 min elongation time for the first primer pair, and a 4 min elongation time for the second primer pair for 36 cycles. The samples were subsequently barcoded by an index PCR with 10 additional cycles. The amplicons were then sequenced with either a MinION instrument (Oxford Nanopore Technologies; LSK-308 library preparation; R9.5 flow cell) or sequenced in circular consensus mode with a PacBio RSII (Pacific Biosciences). The generated sequence data were processed as outlined in Wurzbacher et al. (2019; Suppl. material 1) using a quality filtering step, demultiplexing, alignment, clustering, and consensus generation. The newly generated Auricularia and Inocybe consensus sequences were queried for the presence of ncRNAs as detailed above.

Assessment of ncRNA functionality in Auricularia

An opportunity to at least partially assess whether the ncRNAs found in the Auricularia specimens may be functional – rather than pseudogenes – presented itself through the draft genome assemblies of Auricularia heimuer (strain Dai 13782; NCBI WGS accession NEKD01; Fang et al. 2020) and Auricularia cornea (strain CCMJ2827, WGS RJDY01; Dai et al. 2019). If these genomes, too, were found to contain these ncRNAs in the ribosomal operon, but nowhere else in the genome, then that would suggest that those ncRNA copies are functional. The draft assemblies were queried with the Rfam covariance models as above.


Sequence query and verification of ncRNA matches

Our GenBank query produced more than 30 highly significant ncRNA matches (belonging to the four different ncRNA genes SRP RNA, nuclear RNase P RNA, RNase MRP RNA, and a possible U14) in the IGS1 region of several Auricularia species in GenBank (Fig. 1; Table 1; Suppl. material 2). We re-sequenced the full ribosomal operon of two of these Auricularia species plus four Inocybe species. An ncRNA query of the newly generated sequences verified that the same ncRNAs were present in the same order in these independent specimens, showing that the original GenBank sequences did not represent mis-assemblies or otherwise artifactual sequence data. Interestingly, another Auricularia species – Auricularia polytricha strain MG66 – was found to lack these ncRNAs altogether in the ribosomal operon. Similarly, we found a different combination of ncRNAs (nuclear RNase P and U14) in the IGS1 of Inocybe cincinnata, Inocybe flocculosa, and Inocybe leiocephala; however, Inocybe phaeocystidiosa was found to lack all of the above ncRNAs in the ribosomal operon (Fig. 1, Table 1).

Table 1.

List of specimens/sequences with at least one ncRNA beyond the ordinary rRNA genes. GenBank and collection/herbarium accession numbers are shown. The columns SRP, nuclear RNase P, RNase MRP, and U14 indicate whether these genes were recovered in the ribosomal operon of the specimen/sequence in question. The majority of the Auricularia auricula-judae sequences are from Li et al. (2014). a) For entry WGS:NEKD01, the contig NEKD01000094 contains four operons covering SSU-5S. b) For entry WGS:AFVO01, no rRNA operon could be found in the assembly. c) For entry WGS:QFEN01, the ncRNA genes were found on separate contigs (viz. nuclear RNase P in QFEN01000681, RNase MRP in QFEN01000187, and SRP in QFEN01000909). d) For entry WGS:RJDY01, the ncRNA genes are found in the three operons in RJDY01000048. Accession numbers given in bold were produced as part of this study. WGS project identifiers refer to the NCBI Whole Genome Shotgun assembly database.

GenBank Species name Voucher specimen nuclear RNase P RNase MRP SRP U14
OM964555 Inocybe cincinnata EL113-16 Y N N Y
OM964556 Inocybe flocculosa EL168-16 Y N N Y
OM964554 Inocybe leiocephala EL85-16 Y N N Y
OM964557 Inocybe phaeocystidiosa EL23-16 N N N N
OM964558 Auricularia cornea MFLU16-2108 Y Y Y Y
OM964559 Auricularia delicata MFLU16-2118 Y Y Y Y
WGS:NEKD01 Auricularia heimuer (a) Dai 13782 Y Y Y Y
WGS:AFVO01 Auricularia subglabra (b) TFB-10046 SS5 N N N N
WGS:QFEN01 Auricularia polytricha (c) MG66 Y Y Y N
JF440699.1 Auricularia polytricha AP112 Y Y Y Y
JF440698.1 Auricularia polytricha APFJ Y Y Y Y
JF440701.1 Auricularia delicata ADFJ Y Y Y Y
JF440702.1 Auricularia delicata AD5424 Y Y Y Y
JF440697.1 Auricularia fuscosuccinea AFJLH Y Y Y Y
JF440700.1 Auricularia peltata APLME Y Y Y Y
MN156315 Auricularia cornea B02 Y Y Y Y
WGS:RJDY01 Auricularia cornea (d) CCMJ2827 Y Y Y Y
HQ414239.1 Auricularia auricula-judae XK-1 Y Y Y Y
HQ414240.1 Auricularia auricula-judae HE-1 Y Y Y Y
HQ414241.1 Auricularia auricula-judae DP-5 Y Y Y Y
HQ414242.1 Auricularia auricula-judae XE-987 Y Y Y Y
HQ414243.1 Auricularia auricula-judae ZHI-5 Y Y Y Y
JF440694.1 Auricularia auricula-judae HW5D31 Y Y Y Y
JF440695.1 Auricularia auricula-judae 5L0109 Y Y Y Y
JF440696.1 Auricularia auricula-judae 5L0096 Y Y Y Y
JF440735.1 Auricularia auricula-judae 9809 Y Y Y Y
JF440737.1 Auricularia auricula-judae HE-9 Y Y Y Y
JF440738.1 Auricularia auricula-judae ME-6 Y Y Y Y
JF440739.1 Auricularia auricula-judae XE-887 Y Y Y Y
JF440740.1 Auricularia auricula-judae HE-3 Y Y Y Y
JF440741.1 Auricularia auricula-judae SHAN-1 Y Y Y Y
JF440742.1 Auricularia auricula-judae 8129 Y Y Y Y
JF440743.1 Auricularia auricula-judae DA-2 Y Y Y Y
JF440744.1 Auricularia auricula-judae 173 Y Y Y Y
JF440745.1 Auricularia auricula-judae HME-1 Y Y Y Y
JF440746.1 Auricularia auricula-judae 139 Y Y Y Y
JF440747.1 Auricularia auricula-judae 186 Y Y Y Y
JF440748.1 Auricularia auricula-judae C21 Y Y Y Y
JF440749.1 Auricularia auricula-judae CBS-7 Y Y Y Y
JF440750.1 Auricularia auricula-judae DZ-1 Y Y Y Y
JF440751.1 Auricularia auricula-judae HEI-29 Y Y Y Y
JF440752.1 Auricularia auricula-judae SN-A8 Y Y Y Y
JF440753.1 Auricularia auricula-judae XP-10 Y Y Y Y
JF440754.1 Auricularia auricula-judae YM-1 Y Y Y Y
JF440755.1 Auricularia auricula-judae 8808 Y Y Y Y
JF440756.1 Auricularia auricula-judae 35431 Y Y Y Y
JF440757.1 Auricularia auricula-judae DA-1 Y Y Y Y
JF440758.1 Auricularia auricula-judae DA-3 Y Y Y Y
JF440759.1 Auricularia auricula-judae JY-1 Y Y Y Y
JF440760.1 Auricularia auricula-judae ZJ-310 Y Y Y Y
JF440761.1 Auricularia auricula-judae YE-K3 Y Y Y Y
JF440762.1 Auricularia auricula-judae HEI-916 Y Y Y Y
JN712676.1 Auricularia auricula-judae AU110 Y Y Y Y
Figure 1. 

Schematic illustration of the fungal IGS region and neighbouring genes. Shown are a Auricularia cornea and b Inocybe leiocephala. The four ncRNA elements SRP RNA, nuclear RNase P RNA, RNase MRP RNA, and U14 are shown. U14 is shown in dashed outline to indicate its somewhat hypothetical nature. The arrows indicate strand. This schematic figure is not fully drawn to scale. The distance between LSU and SSU is approximately 5,000 bases, the length of U14 is approximately 200 bases, and the length of the other ncRNAs is approximately 300 bases.

Functional assessment

One of the contigs of the draft genome of Auricularia heimuer (NEKD01000094) was found to contain a ribosomal stretch comprising the expected rRNA genes nuclear small-subunit (nSSU), 5.8S in the ITS region, nuclear large-subunit (nLSU), and 5S but also the RNase P, MRP, and SRP genes, plus a putative U14/SNORD14 ncRNA copy. The result was the same for Auricularia cornea. No other copies of these ncRNAs were found in any other part of the genome assembly. Auricularia subglabra strain TFB-10046 SS5 (AFVO01) produced a similar result: we could not identify any of the ncRNAs in the genome assembly. Unfortunately, for this species the rDNA region was not included in the assembly or available elsewhere, but it seems probable that these ubiquitous ncRNAs would be located in the same region as in A. heimuer. The same result was obtained for Auricularia auricula-judae strain B14-8 (NCVV01). However, in the genome assembly of Auricularia polytricha strain MG66 (QFEN01), these ncRNAs were found on different contigs and none of these contigs contained any rRNA, implying those are the functional copies should additional ones exist also in the rDNA region. Interestingly, the A. polytricha strains AP112 and APFJ do have these ncRNAs in the IGS1 region, but there is no genome assembly available for either AP112 or APFJ.


Alm Rosenblad et al. (2016) provided the first observation of an ncRNA other than the standard SSU, 5.8S, LSU, and 5S genes – namely the SRP RNA – in the ITS region of fungi. We expand on those findings by highlighting not only the SRP RNA gene but also an additional three ncRNA genes – nuclear RNase P RNA, RNase MRP RNA, and a possible U14 – in the IGS region of several Auricularia species. We verified the presence of these IGS ncRNAs through DNA sequencing of conspecific specimens. We furthermore used sequencing to recover the SRP RNA and a putative copy of the U14 gene in the IGS region of three Inocybe species. Our findings suggest that the SRP RNA results of Alm Rosenblad et al. (2016) were not isolated occurrences of limited interest to mycology and RNA biology. On the contrary, the SRP RNA gene seems to have been independently and repeatedly incorporated into the ribosomal operon of numerous fungi. This certainly warrants further investigation.

In addition to the SRP RNA, we also found strong evidence for two other ncRNAs in the IGS1 of both Auricularia specimens we sequenced – Auricularia delicata (MFLU16-2118) and Auricularia cornea (MFLU16-2108) – namely RNase P RNA and RNase MRP RNA. These genes correspond to important components for the maturation of tRNAs and rRNAs, respectively (López et al. 2009). While there are examples of a different type of nuclear RNase P in some organisms, all fungi use the standard RNP-type RNase P (Klemm et al. 2016). For the RNase MRP, there are, as yet, no examples of species lacking this RNP, although the exact composition of its protein subunits is unclear in some groups (Alm Rosenblad et al. 2021). Regarding the U14 snoRNA, which also plays a part in the rRNA maturation process, the prediction score did pass the Rfam threshold, but since a thorough analysis of this ncRNA gene has not yet been made for basidiomycetes, we consider the predictions to be interesting candidates pending further analysis.

The fact that draft genome assemblies of Auricularia heimuer and A. cornea contain these RNAs in their ribosomal operon, but not elsewhere in the genome, suggests that these ncRNA genes are functional. Our approach does not enable us to prove that these ncRNAs indeed are functional, but the case for them as functional must be considered strengthened. The RNase P RNA and the RNase MRP RNA genes have been identified in introns of protein coding genes in metazoans such as Caenorhabditis and Drosophila (López et al. 2009), but there is no example of them from ribosomal operons. However, it has been shown in insects that the RNase P RNA, which is usually transcribed by pol III, is dependent on the recipient gene’s pol II promoter and that splicing is not required for producing a mature RNase P RNA (Manivannan et al. 2015).

Interestingly, whereas our former study found SRP RNAs in the ITS1 region of strictly ectomycorrhizal species, this study reveals the presence of ncRNAs – including the SRP RNA – also in the non-ectomycorrhizal (but instead saprotrophic) basidiomycete genus Auricularia. This suggests that fungal nutritional mode may not determine or require the presence of these ncRNAs in the ribosomal operon, something that would be interesting to pursue in light of further data. It should nevertheless be pointed out that all five fungal genera from which ribosomal operon ncRNAs have been reported - Astraeus, Russula, Lactarius, Inocybe, and Auricularia – belong to the class Agaricomycetes of the Basidiomycota. The significance of this is unclear, but even a cursory glance at the finer levels of the Basidiomycota phylogeny shows that multiple independent gains/losses are needed to explain the observed ncRNA distribution. The fact that a single fungal class has seen a multitude of these events, whereas no other fungal class seems to have seen even a single one, certainly calls for an explanation.

It seems clear that ncRNAs must be taken into consideration in fungal ribosomal genetics. Four different ncRNAs are now known from the fungal ribosomal operon, and further research should screen genome and RNA operon sequences to determine how widespread ncRNAs are in fungi. Indeed, as databases accumulate a steadily increasing number of fungal ribosomal sequences that go far beyond the ITS region, there is every reason to think that additional ncRNAs will be recovered, presumably from non-Agaricomycetes fungi at that. The ribosomal operon is routinely excluded from many genome assemblies due to assembly difficulties (Hibbett et al. 2016), but our findings stress the importance of including it to enable research efforts like the present one. This study seeks to alert our fellow mycologists and RNA biologists to the presence of these ncRNAs in genetic regions where they up until recently were not expected to be, and we certainly hope that the evolutionary history of these ncRNAs and their presence in the fungal ribosomal operon will prove amenable to scientific explanation within not too long. Auricularia mycology primarily relies on genetic markers and genes such as the ITS region, nLSU, and RPB2 (Yuan et al. 2018; Wu et al. 2021), but several studies have explored the Auricularia IGS region for mycological usefulness (e.g., Li et al. 2011 and Li et al. 2019). The present study suggests that caution is warranted when aligning the IGS region of Auricularia and possibly also other fungi due to the potential presence of these ncRNAs. Uncritical alignments may violate homology assumptions and may give rise to noisy multiple sequence alignments and skewed phylogenetic signals.


This study reports on the detection of three non-coding RNA genes hitherto not known from the fungal ribosomal region: nuclear RNase P RNA, RNase MRP RNA, and a possible snoRNA U14 in a total of five species of Auricularia and Inocybe. This expands on the recent finding of another non-coding RNA gene – the Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) RNA – in the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of three ectomycorrhizal genera of basidiomycetes. There are indications that these are functional genes rather than pseudogenes. The occurrence of these non-coding RNAs and their distribution in the fungal tree of life calls for further research attention but also caution in, e.g., multiple sequence alignment-based phylogenetic inference efforts involving the ribosomal regions of these fungi.


CW gratefully acknowledge funding from the German Research Foundation (DFG: WU890/2–1), and MAR gratefully acknowledges funding from Wilhelm and Martina Lundgrens Vetenskapsfond.


  • Abarenkov K, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Nogal-Prata S, Gómez-Martínez D, Stüer-Patowsky K, Jansson T, Põlme S, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Corcoll N, Scharn R, Sánchez-García M, Khomich M, Wurzbacher C, Nilsson RH (2022) The curse of the uncultured fungus. MycoKeys 86: 177–194.
  • Alm Rosenblad M, Martín MP, Tedersoo L, Ryberg M, Larsson E, Wurzbacher C, Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH (2016) Detection of signal recognition particle (SRP) RNAs in the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) of three lineages of ectomycorrhizal fungi (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota). MycoKeys 13: 21–33.
  • Dai Y, Li X, Song B, Sun L, Yang C, Zhang X, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Fu Y, Li Y (2019) Genomic analyses provide insights into the evolutionary history and genetic diversity of Auricularia species. Frontiers in Microbiology 10: e2255.
  • Dumesic PA, Rosenblad MA, Samuelsson T, Nguyen T, Moresco JJ, Yates III JR, Madhani HD (2015) Noncanoncial signal recognition particle RNAs in a major eukaryotic phylum revealed by purification of SRP from the human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Nucleic Acids Research 43(18): 9017–9027.
  • Fang M, Wang X, Chen Y, Wang P, Lu L, Lu J, Yao F, Zhang Y (2020) Genome sequence analysis of Auricularia heimuer combined with genetic linkage map. Journal of Fungi 6(1): e37.
  • Hibbett D, Abarenkov K, Kõljalg U, Öpik M, Chai B, Cole JR, Wang Q, Crous PW, Robert VARG, Helgason T, Herr J, Kirk P, Lueschow S, O’Donnell K, Nilsson RH, Oono R, Schoch CL, Smyth C, Walker D, Porras-Alfaro A, Taylor JW, Geiser DM (2016) Sequence-based classification and identification of Fungi. Mycologia 108: 1049–1068.
  • Klemm BP, Wu N, Chen Y, Liu X, Kaitany KJ, Howard MJ, Fierke CA (2016) The diversity of ribonuclease P: Protein and RNA catalysts with analogous biological functions. Biomolecules 6(2): e27.
  • Li L, Liu W, Bian YB, Xiao Y (2011) Development of species-specific primers for identifying Auricularia auricula-judae using intergenic spacer 1 (IGS1) sequences. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(69): 15494–15500.
  • Li L, Zhong CH, Bian YB (2014) The molecular diversity analysis of Auricularia auricula-judae in China by nuclear ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 17(1): 27–33.
  • Li B-Y, Deng Y-J, Huang R-M, Zhao C, Wen Z-H, Xu W-N, Xie B-G (2019) Analyses of rDNA structure and preliminary evaluation of strains of Auricularia cornea based on IGS sequence. Junwu Xuebao 38: 2214–2220.
  • Li J, Liu X, Yin Z, Hu Z, Zhang KQ (2021) An overview on identification and regulatory mechanisms of long non-coding RNAs in fungi. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: e638617.
  • Manivannan SN, Lai LB, Gopalan V, Simcox A (2015) Transcriptional control of an essential ribozyme in Drosophila reveals an ancient evolutionary divide in animals. PLoS Genet 11(1): e1004893.
  • Nawrocki EP, Burge SW, Bateman A, Daub J, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Floden EW, Gardner PP, Jones TA, Tate J, Finn RD (2014) Rfam 12.0: Updates to the RNA families database. Nucleic Acids Research 43(D1): D130–D1373.
  • Nilsson RH, Larsson K-H, Taylor AFS, Bengtsson-Palme J, Jeppesen TS, Schigel D, Kennedy P, Picard K, Glöckner FO, Tedersoo L, Saar I, Kõljalg U, Abarenkov K (2019) The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: Handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Research 47(D1): D259–D264.
  • Sayers EW, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Pruitt KD, Schoch CL, Sherry ST, Karsch-Mizrachi I (2021) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research 49(D1): D92–D96.
  • Wu F, Tohtirjap A, Fan LF, Zhou LW, Alvarenga RLM, Gibertoni TB, Dai YC (2021) Global diversity and updated phylogeny of Auricularia (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota). Journal of Fungi (Basel, Switzerland) 7(11): e933.
  • Wurzbacher C, Larsson E, Bengtsson-Palme J, Van den Wyngaert S, Svantesson S, Kristiansson E, Kagami M, Nilsson RH (2019) Introducing ribosomal tandem repeat barcoding for fungi. Molecular Ecology Resources 19(1): 118–127.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Details of the sequence processing steps.

Magnus Alm Rosenblad, Ellen Larsson, Arttapon Walker, Naritsada Thongklang, Christian Wurzbacher, R. Henrik Nilsson

Data type: pdf file

Explanation note: Details of the sequence processing steps.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (147.29 kb)
Supplementary material 2 

List of absolute positions of the rRNA and ncRNA genes in the six sequences released with this study

Magnus Alm Rosenblad, Ellen Larsson, Arttapon Walker, Naritsada Thongklang, Christian Wurzbacher, R. Henrik Nilsson

Data type: pdf file

Explanation note: List of absolute positions of the rRNA and ncRNA genes in the six sequences released with this study. The positions listed are from Infernal cmscan searches and the names are those used by Rfam. For Auricularia, the special model for basidiomycete SRP RNA from Dumesic et al. (2015) was used. Positions for the WGS contig of Auricularia heimuer mentioned in the text has been added below the sequences from this study. Note that the contig has been reverse-complemented before annotation to aid comparison. The contig contains four rRNA operons.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (98.98 kb)
login to comment