Research Article
Print
Research Article
Phylogeny and taxonomy of Catenularia and similar fungi with catenate conidia
expand article infoMartina Réblová, Jana Nekvindová§, Andrew N. Miller|
‡ Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Průhonice, Czech Republic
§ University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States of America
Open Access

Abstract

The genus Catenularia (Chaetosphaeriaceae) was reviewed, and its relationships with morphologically similar fungi were evaluated using molecular and morphological data. Eleven species are accepted, four of which have been verified with molecular DNA data. The correct epithet ‘cupulifera’ is proposed for the type species C. cupulifera comb. nov. Four other combinations are proposed, namely C. catenulata comb. nov., C. elsikii comb. nov., C. minor comb. nov. and C. novae-zelandiae comb. nov. Catenularia is an uncommon fungus inhabiting mainly decaying bark, wood and bamboo culms of various hosts and shows a widespread geographical distribution. It is circumscribed for fungi with mononematous, macronematous, simple conidiophores with terminal monophialides, usually accompanied with capitate hyphae. The conidia are aseptate, brown, cuneiform to rounded-obconic with an angular outline, adhering in chains. The diagnostic values of taxonomic characteristics of capitate hyphae and conidia (i.e. colour, shape in transverse section, setulae and formation) at the generic level were evaluated. An account of morphology, taxonomy and phylogeny of species accepted in Catenularia is provided. Based on ribosomal DNA sequences, Chalarodes obpyramidata sp. nov., characterised by catenate, angular, hyaline conidia with apical setulae, is revealed as closely related to Catenularia. The new genus Fuscocatenula gen. nov. is proposed for catenularia-like fungi having pigmented conidia with protracted maturation and round outline, with two species accepted, F. submersa comb. nov. and F. variegata comb. nov. A new species Nawawia antennata sp. nov. is introduced and Nawawia is compared with morphologically similar taxa.

Keywords

angular conidia, basipetal chain, Chaetosphaeria, lignicolous, molecular systematics, phialidic conidiogenesis, 10 taxonomic novelties

Introduction

Catenularia (Saccardo 1886) is one of the oldest genera classified in the Chaetosphaeriaceae. In April 1886, Saccardo introduced ‘Catenularia Grove in litt.’ with two species, ‘C. simplex Grove in litt.’ and C. atra (= Spadicoides atra, Hughes 1958), of which C. simplex is regarded as the type (Clements and Shear 1931). Grove (1886) intended the genus to be monotypic, and later that year published Catenularia again with C. simplex as the only species observed on wood in the United Kingdom. However, C. simplex has previously been described by Berkeley and Broome (1871) as the presumed but nameless conidial state of Sphaeria cupulifera on decaying elm roots also in the United Kingdom. The species was illustrated with pigmented conidiophores arising singly from ascomata and in tufts around them, with a funnel-shaped collarette and cuneiform, dark brown, aseptate conidia adhering in chains. The anamorph was named Psilonia cuneiformis by Richon (1877) based on a collection on wood in France and later transferred to the monotypic genus Psiloniella (Costantin 1888). Mason (1941) concluded that P. cuneiformis and C. simplex are conspecific and accepted P. cuneiformis in Catenularia with C. simplex listed as a synonym. De Seynes (1886) and Booth (1958) confirmed that S. cupulifera (= Chaetosphaeria cupulifera, Saccardo 1883) and C. cuneiformis belong to the life cycle of the same species (Fig. 1). Booth (1958) noted that the conidiophores develop from the modified outer cells of the ascomatal wall and arise from hyphae at the ascomatal bases.

Figure 1. 

Illustrations of teleomorph and anamorph of Catenularia cupulifera A Sphaeria cupulifera: ascoma, ascus and ascospores with sporulating conidiophores (holotype, Berkeley and Broome 1871) B Psilonia cuneiformis: conidiophores with conidia (holotype, Richon 1877).

Linder (1933) erected Haplochalara based on H. angulospora for fungi morphologically similar to Catenularia and compared it with Chalaropsis and Thielaviopsis based on the similar pigmented, phialidic conidia in chains. Both latter genera are currently accepted in the Ceratocystidaceae (De Beer et al. 2014). Mason (1941) was the first to suggest the remarkable similarity of H. angulospora to Catenularia and transferred it to the latter genus.

Hughes (1965) presented the first comprehensive treatise of Catenularia and accepted four species. The genus was circumscribed for lignicolous hyphomycetes with simple, pigmented conidiophores arising solitary or in tufts, with dark stromatic cells around their bases, accompanied by capitate hyphae and with monophialidic conidiogenous cells extending percurrently. The conidia adhere in chains; they are aseptate, brown, cuneiform to rounded-obconic in side view, polygonal in transverse section with a small, circular, thin-walled, pale area at each corner. Capitate hyphae, a term coined by Hughes (1949), were originally proposed for sterile hyphae scattered among conidiophores of Sporoschisma. These are erect, brown, septate hyphae that extend percurrently and terminate into a paler, swollen apex. The apical cell bears a mucilaginous hyaline cap or pale coloured droplets that may disappear with age. Capitate hyphae also occur on the ascomatal wall of the teleomorphs.

Hughes (1965) did not accept the synonymy of Catenularia and Haplochalara. He considered capitate hyphae to be one of the main diagnostic features at the generic level, but which were missing in H. angulospora. Hughes (1965) excluded from Catenularia another nine species with ellipsoidal or globose, hyaline or slightly pigmented conidia, different conidiogenous cell morphology and modes of conidiogenesis. Some of these species have been reclassified and are currently attributed to genera such as Chloridium, Exochalara, Gliomastix, Monilochaetes, Periconia, Spadicoides, Sporoschismopsis and Thielaviopsis (Mangenot 1952; Booth 1957; Hughes 1958, 1965; Von Arx 1970; Holubová-Jechová and Hennebert 1972; Gams and Holubová-Jechová 1976; Schoknecht and Crane 1977; Rong and Gams 2000; Mbenoun et al. 2014; De Beer et al. 2014). Other authors did not follow such a narrow generic circumscription and several species without capitate hyphae were introduced in Catenularia, namely C. catenulata (Luo et al. 2019), C. hughesii (Sharma 1980), C. kalakadensis and C. malabrica (Subramanian and Bhat 1989), and C. variegata (Li et al. 2017). Admission of C. variegata in Catenularia introduced further heterogeneity into the genus. This species has a protracted maturation of conidia that are cuneiform or obovoid in the side view, but have round outline and lack typical corners with pore-like areas at the apex.

Species with the Catenularia morphotype have been named inconsistently as Catenularia or Chaetosphaeria. To date, 24 species and varieties have been referred to as Catenularia and six as their Chaetosphaeria counterparts (Berkeley and Broome 1871; Saccardo 1886; Linder 1933; Booth 1958; Hughes 1965; Sharma 1980; Holubová-Jechová 1982, 1983; Subramanian and Bhat 1989; Réblová and Seifert 2003; Li et al. 2017; Luo et al. 2019). They have a saprobic lifestyle and occur on decaying bark, wood or bamboo culms in terrestrial, less often freshwater habitats worldwide. Pound et al. (2019) published Ch. elsikii, a fossil species similar to the Catenularia anamorph of Ch. novae-zelandiae. After the abolishment of dual nomenclature and subsequent changes to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN; McNeill et al. 2012), Catenularia has never been formally accepted as a holomorphic genus, along with the correct taxonomic treatment of its type species.

The characteristics of conidia, conidiogenous cells, conidiophores and the mode of conidiogenesis are the main diagnostic traits that distinguish genera of the Chaetosphaeriaceae, while their teleomorphs are usually morphologically uniform. Among members of the family, Catenularia, Nawawia (Marvanová 1980) and Phialosporostilbe (Mercado Sierra and Mena Portales 1985) share a basic pattern of turbinate to obpyramidal, angular and aseptate conidia. The conidia of Catenularia are brown and without setulae, conidia of the latter genera are hyaline with several setulae at the apex, occasionally also at the base. Nawawia contains species with mononematous conidiophores, terminal monophialides elongating percurrently, and conidia aggregated in heads. In contrast, Phialosporostilbe has synnematous conidiophores associated with setae, terminal monophialides and conidia aggregated in heads, rarely in chains (Mercado Sierra and Mena Portales 1985; Sureshkumar et al. 2005). Nawawia and Phialosporostilbe are saprobes on decaying plant material, often submerged in freshwater, occasionally isolated from soil (e.g. Marvanová 1980; Mercado Sierra and Mena Portales 1985; Bhat and Kendrick 1993; Mel’nik and Hyde 2006; Wu and Zhang 2009; Goh et al. 2014). In characters of conidia, they closely resemble Chalarodes (McKenzie 1991) and Obeliospora (Nawawi and Kuthubutheen 1990), whose systematic placement remains unexplored. The genus Chalarodes includes fungi inhabiting decaying palm leaves, and is widespread in Australasia (McKenzie 1991). The conidia adhere in basipetal chains and are borne on terminal monophialides on mononematous conidiophores. The colonies of Obeliospora are composed of dark, acute setae accompanied by short, monilioid conidiophores with doliiform conidiogenous cells and conspicuous cup-shaped collarettes. The genus accommodates species that thrive on submerged wood or plant litter in freshwater biotopes, occasionally they occur in terrestrial habitats, in South America and Southeast Asia (Nawawi and Kuthubutheen 1990; Kuthubutheen and Nawawi 1994; Wu and Mckenzie 2003; Cantillo-Pérez et al. 2018).

This study is based on nuc rDNA sequences combined with a comparative analysis of phenotypic data. It aims to evaluate the generic concept of Catenularia and its relationships with morphologically similar taxa. Another aim is to assess whether phenotypic characteristics such as the presence or absence of capitate hyphae and selected conidial features (i.e. colour, shape in transverse section, setulae and formation at the tip of the conidiogenous cell) are congruent with phylogenetic relationships.

Materials and methods

Fungal strains, morphology and DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Specimens of Catenularia, Chalarodes, Nawawia and Sporoschisma were collected in various localities in temperate and tropical geographical areas in Cuba, Czech Republic, France, Belgium, Martinique, New Zealand, Slovak Republic and Thailand. Other specimens were obtained from the Canadian National Mycological Herbarium (DAOM, Ottawa, Canada), Farlow herbarium (FH, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA), New Zealand Fungarium (PDD, Auckland, New Zealand), Herbarium of the National Museum (PRM, Prague, Czech Republic), and Herbarium of the Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (W, Vienna, Austria). Holotypes and specimens (as dried voucher specimens) were deposited at PDD and Herbarium of the Institute of Botany (PRA, Průhonice, Czech Republic). Fungal novelties were registered in MycoBank.

For morphological study, isolation and cultivation we follow Réblová et al. (2021a) and references cited therein. Axenic cultures were derived from freshly collected material. Strains were inoculated on potato-carrot agar (PCA) (Crous et al. 2019).

Protocols for the DNA extraction and PCR amplification followed Huhndorf et al. (2004), Hustad and Miller (2015) and Réblová et al. (2020). Automated sequencing was carried out by Eurofins GATC Biotech Sequencing Service (Cologne, Germany), Ottawa Research and Development Centre, Biodiversity (Mycology and Microbiology), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) and the Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (Champaign, Illinois, USA). Raw sequence data were analysed using Sequencher v.5.4.6 (Gene Codes Corp., USA, Michigan, Ann Arbor).

Alignments and phylogenetic analyses

In order to assess relationships of Catenularia with similar fungi, sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) (ITS) of the nuclear rRNA cistron and the large subunit 28S rDNA gene (28S) (ca. 1800 base pairs at the 5′-end) were analysed. Isolates, their sources and GenBank accession numbers of sequences generated in this study and those retrieved from GenBank and published in other studies (Réblová and Winka 2000, 2001; Fernández et al. 2006; Somrithipol et al. 2008; Shenoy et al. 2010; Magyar et al. 2011; Crous et al. 2012; Hashimoto et al. 2015; Hernández-Restrepo et al. 2016, 2017; Liu et al. 2016; Lu et al. 2016; Ma et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2018; Lin et al. 2019; Luo et al. 2019; Vu et al. 2019; Réblová et al. 2020, 2021a, b) are listed in the Suppl. material 1: Table S1.

Consensus secondary structure (2D) models for the ITS1 and ITS2 for members of the Chaetosphaeriaceae were built using the Ppfold program v.3.0 (Sukosd et al. 2012). The obtained 2D consensus models were further improved using the program Mfold (Zuker 2003) and RNAfold web server through the ViennaRNA Web Services (Gruber et al. 2015) and adjusted manually if necessary. The predicted 2D RNA structures were obtained in a dot bracket notation and were visualised and drawn using the program VARNA: Visualisation Applet for RNA (Darty et al. 2009).

Sequences were aligned manually in Bioedit v.7.1.8 (Hall et al. 1999). Consensus 2D structure models for the ITS1 and ITS2 were used to compare nucleotides at homologous positions (in helices and loops) and construct a reliable multiple sequence alignment. A predicted 2D model of the 28S of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Gutell et al. 1993) was used to improve the alignment of this gene. The models were highly consistent in all species.

The ITS and 28S datasets, for which we assumed rate heterogeneity, were evaluated using PartitionFinder2 (Lanfear et al. 2017), implemented in the CIPRES Science Gateway v.3.3 (Miller et al. 2010), to find the best partitioning scheme for our datasets and to select best-fit models under corrected Akaike information criteria. Phylogenetic reconstructions were performed using Bayesian Inference (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) analyses through the CIPRES Science Gateway v.3.3. ML analysis was conducted with RAxML-HPC v.8.2.12 (Stamatakis 2014) with a GTRCAT approximation. BI analysis was executed in a likelihood framework as implemented in MrBayes v.3.2.6 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001). The phylogenetic analyses were performed as described in Réblová et al. (2021a).

The conflict-free single locus data sets were concatenated and the ITS-28S alignment (deposited in TreeBASE) was subjected to the phylogenetic analysis. Ninety nucleotides (nt) at the 5′-end of 28S were excluded from the alignment because of the incompleteness in the majority of sequences. The full dataset consisted of 2386 characters including gaps (ITS = 612 characters; 28S = 1774) and 1038 unique character sites (RAxML). For the BI analysis, GTR+I+G model was selected for both partitions. Tracylla aristata and T. eucalypti (Tracyllales) were selected as outgroup taxa.

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

In the phylogenetic analysis of the combined ITS-28S sequences, we evaluated systematic placement of Catenularia in the Chaetosphaeriaceae and its relationships with morphologically similar taxa. The ML and BI trees were largely congruent; the ML tree is shown in Fig. 2. The Chaetosphaeriaceae included 49 well supported clades that correspond to individual genera or natural groups of species. The genus Catenularia was resolved as a monophyletic, strongly supported clade (95% ML, BS 1.0 PP) with four species, C. angulospora, C. cubensis, C. minor and C. catenulata. Catenularia resided in a statistically well supported clade at the base of the tree. This clade contained six other genera and natural groups of species, including Exserticlava vasiformis and Stanjehughesia hormiscioides, known to form capitate hyphae on ascomata of their teleomorphs. Catenularia was shown as a sister (95/1.0) to an unknown species of Chalarodes, described as Cha. obpyramidata below. Morphologically similar genera Nawawia and Phialosporostilbe were resolved as separate lineages. Chaetosphaeria submersa, superficially resembling Catenularia, was clustered in a distantly related clade containing Phaeostalagmus, and also Ch. innumera and another two Chaetosphaeria species with anamorphs with catenate conidia, i.e. Chloridium clavaeforme and Ch. phaeophorum.

Figure 2. 

A Phylogenetic analysis of the combined ITS and 28S sequences of members of the Chaetosphaeriaceae. Species names given in bold are taxonomic novelties; T, E, I, N and P indicate ex-type, ex-epitype, ex-isotype, ex-neotype and ex-paratype strains; * holotype of Chaetosphaeria trianguloconidia; # Catenularia cubensis fide Luo et al. (2019). Thickened branches indicate branch support with ML BS = 100%, PP values = 1.0. Branch support of nodes ≥ 75% ML BS and ≥ 0.95 PP is indicated above and below branches B phylogenetic analysis of ITS and 28S of the Chaetosphaeriaceae (continued). For legend refer to (A). Abbreviation: p.p. after a genus name (pro parte).

Figure 2. 

Continued.

Taxonomy

Catenularia Grove, Syll. fung. 4: 303. 1886.

Synonyms. Psiloniella Costantin, Mucéd. Simpl.: 25, 190. 1888.

Haplochalara Linder, Mycologia 25: 347. 1933.

Type species

Catenularia cupulifera (Berk. & Broome) Réblová & A.N. Mill.

Emended description

Colonies effuse, hairy to velutinous, brown, dark brown to black, mycelium partly immersed, partly superficial; composed of conidiophores, capitate hyphae and sometimes ascomata. Anamorph. Conidiophores macronematous, mononematous, solitary or in tufts, with dark stromatic hyphal cells around the bases, erect, straight or flexuous, unbranched, brown to dark brown, thick-walled, paler and thinner-walled towards the apex. Capitate hyphae scattered among the conidiophores, occasionally absent, erect, brown, extending percurrently, paler towards the apex, apical cell sterile, thin-walled, subhyaline to hyaline, slightly swollen, broadly rounded with a hyaline mucilaginous cap that may disappear with age. Conidiogenous cells integrated, terminal, monophialidic, extending percurrently, cylindrical, subcylindrical or somewhat lageniform, brown, conidia produced successively; collarettes cup- or funnel-shaped, brown, smooth or slightly roughened, margin entire or frayed. Conidia cuneiform, obclavate, rounded-obconic to broadly obovoid in side view, with an angular outline when viewed from above with 3–6 blunt corners, broadly rounded to flattened at the apex, truncate at the distinctive, hyaline basal hilum, with a small, circular, thin-walled, pore-like area visible in the cell wall at each corner, sometimes with a visible central pore at the base, aseptate, hyaline when young, fuscous, fulvous, brown to dark brown at maturity, thick-walled, smooth; formed singly, adhered in basipetal chains, occasionally in clusters. Teleomorph. Ascomata perithecial, non-stromatic, superficial, globose, subglobose to conical, papillate, glabrous occasionally with a powdery layer that disappears with age, sometimes covered with conidiophores and capitate hyphae. Ostiolar canal periphysate. Ascomatal wall carbonaceous, two-layered. Paraphyses persistent, branching, anastomosing, hyaline, longer than the asci. Asci unitunicate, short-stipitate, apical annulus non-amyloid, with eight ascospores. Ascospores fusiform, transversely septate, hyaline, smooth, without mucilaginous sheath or appendages.

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on decaying bark, wood and bamboo culms of various hosts. Members of Catenularia have a worldwide distribution in temperate, subtropical and tropical geographic areas.

Notes

Hughes (1965) considered capitate hyphae to be an important diagnostic characteristic of Catenularia. These structures have long escaped attention, and mycologists began to notice them only after they were described by Hughes (1949). We studied holotype material of several species and original descriptions and illustrations to examine and trace this character in Catenularia. Capitate hyphae have not been mentioned in the original descriptions of C. cupulifera (Berkeley and Broome 1871; Richon 1877; Grove 1886). In studying collections of this species, we observed a variation in the presence of capitate hyphae. In some specimens, capitate hyphae are abundantly present, but may be scarce and difficult to find in others. Revision of the holotypes of C. cuneiformis var. minor (Holubová-Jechová 1983) and Ch. trianguloconidia (Réblová and Seifert 2003) not only revealed that both fungi are conspecific, but also led to the discovery of capitate hyphae, although they were not mentioned in the protologues of either species. They are scattered among conidiophores and easy to overlook. Phylogenetic analysis of several Catenularia representatives with capitate hyphae (C. cubensis and C. minor) and those without them (C. angulospora, C. catenulata) provided compelling evidence to consider these species congeneric.

In this study, we present a taxonomic circumscription of Catenularia using molecular and phenotypic data. The generic concept has been emended and species with and without capitate hyphae are accepted in Catenularia. We were unsuccessful in obtaining C. cupulifera into axenic culture from fresh material. The available non-type strain CBS 419.80 of this species is a contaminant (In the Blast search, ITS and 28S sequences derived from this strain showed 100% identity with sequences of various strains of Calycina citrina.). Eleven species are accepted in Catenularia and listed below, four of which have been verified with molecular DNA data. Other species are accepted based on morphological similarity, but have to be confirmed as members of Catenularia by molecular data. So far, the teleomorph has been observed in C. cubensis, C. cupulifera, C. minor and C. novae-zelandiae. Catenularia variegata (Li et al. 2017) is excluded from Catenularia and transferred to a new segregate genus Fuscocatenula in this study. Disposition of Catenularia and morphologically similar taxa previously attributed to the genus is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Species of Catenularia: accepted species (in bold) and disposition of morphologically similar taxa previously treated in Catenularia and Chaetosphaeria.

Name in Catenularia and Chaetosphaeria Current name Current classification Reference
Catenularia angulospora (Linder) E.W. Mason* Catenularia angulospora (Linder) E.W. Mason Chaetosphaeriales Mason (1941)
C. antarctica Henn.* Periconia antarctica (Henn.) S. Hughes Pleosporales Hughes (1965)
C. atra (Corda) Sacc.* Spadicoides atra (Corda) S. Hughes Xenospadicoidales Hughes (1958)
C. cubensis Hol.-Jech. Catenularia cubensis Hol.-Jech. Chaetosphaeriales Holubová-Jechová (1982)
C. cuneiformis var. cuneiformis (Richon) E.W. Mason Catenularia cupulifera (Berk. & Broome) Réblová & A.N. Mill. Chaetosphaeriales Mason (1941), this study
C. cuneiformis var. minor Hol.-Jech. Catenularia minor (Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & A.N. Mill. Chaetosphaeriales Holubová-Jechová (1983), this study
C. echinata Wakker* Thielaviopsis ethacetica Went Microascales De Beer et al. (2014)
C. elasticae Koord.* Gliomastix elasticae (Koord.) Crane & Schoknecht Hypocreales Schoknecht and Crane (1977)
C. fuliginea Saito* Wallemia sebi (Fr.) Arx Wallemiales Von Arx (1970)
C. fuliginea var. lunzinensis Szilv.* Catenularia fuliginea var. lunzinensis Szilv. unknown Von Szilvinyi (1941)
C. guadalcanalensis Matsush. Monilochaetes guadalcanalensis (Matsush.) I.H. Rong & W. Gams Glomerellales Rong and Gams (2000)
C. heimii F. Mangenot* Chloridium clavaeforme (Preuss) W. Gams & Hol.-Jech. Chaetosphaeriales Gams and Holubová-Jechová (1976)
C. hughesii N.D. Sharma Catenularia angulospora (Linder) E.W. Mason Chaetosphaeriales Sharma (1980)
C. kalakadensis Subram. & Bhat Catenularia kalakadensis Subram. & Bhat Chaetosphaeriales Subramanian and Bhat (1989)
C. longispora S. Hughes Catenularia longispora S. Hughes Chaetosphaeriales Hughes (1965)
C. macrospora S. Hughes Catenularia macrospora S. Hughes Chaetosphaeriales Hughes (1965)
C. malabarica Subram. & Bhat Catenularia malabarica Subram. & Bhat Chaetosphaeriales Subramanian and Bhat (1989)
C. megalospora Speg.* Catenularia megalospora Speg. unknown Spegazzini (1898)
C. piceae M.B. Ellis Exochalara longissima (Grove) W. Gams & Hol.-Jech. Helotiales Gams and Holubová-Jechová (1976)
C. pidopliczkoi (Zhdanova) M.A. Litv. Haplochalara pidoplitschkoi Zhdanova unknown Litvinov (1967)
C. simmonsii Morgan-Jones Sporoschismopsis simmonsii (Morgan-Jones) Hol.-Jech. & Hennebert Glomerellales Holubová-Jechová and Hennebert (1972)
C. simplex Grove Catenularia cupulifera (Berk. & Broome) Réblová & A.N. Mill. Chaetosphaeriales Saccardo (1886), this study
C. variegata H.H. Li & X.G. Zhang Fuscocatenula variegata (H.H. Li & X.G. Zhang) Réblová & A.N. Mill. Chaetosphaeriales Li et al. (2017), this study
C. velutina Syd. & P. Syd.* Catenularia velutina Syd. & P. Syd. unknown Sydow and Sydow (1914)
Chaetosphaeria catenulata Z.L. Luo, K.D. Hyde & H.Y. Su Catenularia catenulata (Z.L. Luo, K.D. Hyde & H.Y. Su) Réblová & A.N. Mill. Chaetosphaeriales Luo et al. (2019), this study
Ch. cubensis Hol.-Jech. Catenularia cubensis Hol.-Jech. Chaetosphaeriales Holubová-Jechová (1983), this study
Ch. cupulifera (Berk. & Broome) Sacc. Catenularia cupulifera (Berk. & Broome) Réblová & A.N. Mill. Chaetosphaeriales Berkeley and Broome (1871), this study
Ch. elsikii M.J. Pound et al. Catenularia elsikii (M.J. Pound et al.) Réblová & A.N. Mill. Chaetosphaeriales Pound et al. (2019), this study
Ch. novae-zelandiae S. Hughes & Shoemaker Catenularia novae-zelandiae (S. Hughes & Shoemaker) Réblová & A.N. Mill. Chaetosphaeriales Hughes (1965), this study
Ch. trianguloconidia Réblová & Seifert Catenularia minor (Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & A.N. Mill. Chaetosphaeriales Réblová and Seifert (2003), this study

Haplochalara (Linder 1933) and Psiloniella (Costantin 1888) are accepted as generic synonyms of Catenularia. The systematic placement of H. pidoplitschkoi (Litvinov 1967) is unknown. The species was characterised by dematiaceous, erect, simple conidiophores producing ellipsoidal, hyaline conidia that accumulate in slimy droplets and formation of dark chlamydospores in culture. Based on these characteristics, the species shows affinity to Chloridium (Gams and Holubová-Jechová 1976) and would be better placed in this genus.

Key to Catenularia species

1 Capitate hyphae present 2
Capitate hyphae absent or this character is unknown 7
2 Conidia 5.5–8.5 μm long, 3.5–5.5 μm wide at the apical end, 1.5–2 μm wide at base, with three bluntly rounded corners C. cubensis
Conidia 9 μm and longer 3
3 Conidia up to 13.5 μm long and up to 11.5 μm wide 4
Conidia 13.5 μm and longer, wider than 11.5 μm 5
4 Conidia (9–)10.5–13.5 μm long, 7–9.5 μm wide at the apical end, 3.5–4.5 μm wide at the basal hilum, with (3–)4(–5) blunt corners C. cupulifera
Conidia (6.5–)7.5–10.5(–13) μm long, 6.5–11.5 μ wide at the apical end, 1.5–2.5 μm wide at the base, with 3–5 blunt corners C. minor
5 Conidia 11.5–17.5 μm long, 14.5–18.5 μm wide at the apical end, 4–5.5 μm wide at the base, with 4–5 blunt corners C. novae-zelandiae
Conidia longer than 17.5 μm 6
6 Conidia 21–28 μm long, 19–28 μm wide at the apical end, 4–7 μm wide at the base, with (3–)4(–5) blunt corners C. macrospora
Conidia 27–45 μm long, 16.8–24 μm wide at the apical end, 7–10 μm wide at the base, with three blunt corners C. longispora
7 Conidia up to 9 μm long 8
Conidia longer than 9 μm 9
8 Conidia 6–8(–9) μm long, 4.5–6(–7) μm wide at the apical end, ca. 2 μm wide at the base, with three blunt corners C. angulospora
Conidia up to 8 μm long, 6–7 μm wide at the apical end, 1.5–3.5 μm side at the base, with six corners C. kalakadensis
9 Conidia 13–15 μm long, 12–14 μm wide at the apical end, with 3–4 corners C. catenulata
Conidia wider than 15 μm 10
10 Conidia 12–18 μm long, 18–21 μm wide, 3–4 μm wide at the base, with 4–5 corners C. malabrica
Conidia 23–24.5 μm long, 20.8–24 μm wide, 3–4 μm wide at the base, with five corners C. elsikii

Catenularia angulospora (Linder) E.W. Mason, Mycol. Pap. 5: 121. 1941.

Fig. 3

Basionym. Haplochalara angulospora Linder, Mycologia 25: 347. 1933.

Synonym. ? Catenularia hughesii N.D. Sharma, J. Indian bot. Soc. 59: 73. 1980.

Description

Colonies on natural substrate effuse, hairy to velutinous, dark brown to almost black. Anamorph. Conidiophores 77–220 × 4.5–6(–7) μm wide, 7–8 μm above the base, macronematous, solitary or arise in tufts, erect, straight or slightly flexuous, unbranched, dark brown, paler towards the apex, septate. Capitate hyphae absent. Conidiogenous cells 18–25 × 3.5–4.5 μm tapering to ca. 2.5 μm, integrated, terminal, monophialidic, extending percurrently, obclavate to subcylindrical or slightly lageniform, pale brown, paler towards the apex; collarettes 3–4 μm wide, 1.5(–2) μm deep, funnel-shaped, subhyaline, smooth, margin entire. Conidia 6–8(–9) μm long, 4.5–6(–7) μm wide at the apical end, ca. 2 μm wide at the basal hilum (mean ± SD = 7.4 ± 1.1 × 6.0 ± 1.2 μm × 2.0 ± 0.0 μm), rounded-obconic in side view, with three blunt corners when viewed from above, broadly rounded to flattened at the apex, truncate at the basal scar, pale brown to pale fuscous, thick-walled, smooth; formed singly, adhered in basipetal chains. Teleomorph. Unknown.

Figure 3. 

Catenularia angulospora (holotype FH 00965375) A vertical section of the wood with colony B–D conidiophores with conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (A); 50 μm (B–D).

Specimen examined

USA – Kentucky • near Louisville; on decaying beech log; 23 Mar. 1928; D.H. Linder (holotype of C. angulospora FH herbarium 00965375, as microscopic slides).

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on dead culms of Bambusa sp., decaying wood of Fagus sp. and other unknown hosts in freshwater and terrestrial habitats. It is known in China, India and the USA (Linder 1933; Sharma 1980; Luo et al. 2019 as C. cubensis).

Notes

For additional description and illustration, see Luo et al. (2019, as C. cubensis). Hughes (1965) revised the type material of H. angulospora, and despite the striking similarities to other Catenularia, he kept the species in Haplochalara due to the absence of capitate hyphae. Sharma (1980) described C. hughesii on dead bamboo culms in India with pale brown to brown conidia 6–8 × 4.5–5.8 μm and conidiophores up to 270 × 5–7 μm. Although the holotype of this species was not available for study, a detailed morphological comparison of its original description and illustration with C. angulospora suggests that they are conspecific. Luo et al. (2019) reported this species as C. cubensis (strain MFLUCC 18-1331) from China, characterised by the absence of capitate hyphae and cuneiform, greyish-brown to brown conidia 6–8 × 4–6 μm.

In the phylogenetic analysis, the strain of C. angulospora MFLUCC 18-1331 clustered as a sister to C. cubensis S.M.H. 3258, but their relationship is not statistically supported. Both species are, however, very similar. Catenularia cubensis (Holubová-Jechová 1982) differs from C. angulospora in brown to dark brown conidia, slightly narrower at the apical end (5.5–8.5 × 3.5–5.5 μm), and presence of capitate hyphae scattered among the conidiophores. The ITS sequence identity between C. cubensis and C. angulospora is 96.5% and supports our conclusion to treat them as separate species.

Catenularia catenulata (Z.L. Luo, K.D. Hyde & H.Y. Su) Réblová & A.N. Mill., comb. nov.

MycoBank No: 839462

Basionym. Chaetosphaeria catenulata Z.L. Luo, K.D. Hyde & H.Y. Su, Fungal Divers. 99: 582. 2019.

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on submerged wood, known only in China (Luo et al. 2019).

Notes

Catenularia catenulata is characterised by solitary conidiophores, absence of capitate hyphae and conidia 13–15 × 12–14 μm, greyish-brown, turbinate, triangular in side view with 3–4 corners when viewed from above (Luo et al. 2019). It resembles C. malabrica (Subramanian and Bhat 1989), but the latter species has larger conidia 12–18 × 18–21 μm with 4–5 corners.

Catenularia cubensis Hol.-Jech., Mycotaxon 15: 278. 1982.

Fig. 4

Synonym. Chaetosphaeria cubensis Hol.-Jech., Mycotaxon 15: 278. 1982.

Description

Colonies on natural substrate effuse, hairy to velutinous, dark brown, mycelium partly immersed, partly superficial, brown; colonies composed of conidiophores, capitate hyphae and sometimes ascomata. Anamorph. Conidiophores 115–200 × 4–4.5 μm, 4.5–6 μm wide above the base, macronematous, solitary or arise in tufts, erect, straight or flexuous, unbranched, thick-walled, brown to dark brown, slightly paler towards the apex. Capitate hyphae 104–165 × 4–4.5 μm, 4–5.5 μm wide above the base, arise among the conidiophores, extending percurrently, erect, straight, brown to dark brown, paler towards the apex, apical cell sterile, thin-walled, subhyaline, slightly swollen, ca. 3.5 μm wide, broadly rounded, the hyaline gelatinous cap was not observed. Conidiogenous cells 22–38 × 3.5–4.5 μm tapering to 2–2.5 μm below the collarette, terminal, integrated, monophialidic, extending percurrently, cylindrical, pale brown to brown, producing conidia successively; collarettes 3.5–4 μm wide, 1–2 μm deep, shallow, funnel-shaped, pale brown, smooth, margin entire. Conidia 5.5–8.5 μm long, 3.5–5.5 μm wide at the apical end, 1.5–2 μm wide at the basal hilum (mean ± SD = 7.5 ± 0.7 × 4.3 ± 0.4 × 1.8 ± 0.2 μm), rounded-obconic to broadly obovoid in side view, with three bluntly rounded corners when viewed from above, broadly rounded to flattened at the apex, truncate at the basal scar, aseptate, brown to dark brown, thick-walled, smooth; formed singly, adhered in basipetal chains. Teleomorph. Ascomata 150–200 µm diam, 160–210 µm high, superficial, solitary or in groups, subglobose to conical, papillate, dark brown to black, covered with conidiophores and capitate hyphae. Ostiole periphysate. Ascomatal wall fragile, carbonaceous, 15–25 μm thick, two-layered. Outer layer consisting of brown, polyhedral cells with opaque walls. Inner layer consisting of several rows of thin-walled, hyaline cells. Paraphyses 2.5–3.5 μm wide, septate, hyaline, longer than the asci. Asci 62–84.5 × (6–)7–8.5 μm (mean ± SD = 72.2 ± 7.8 × 13.9 ± 0.9 µm), cylindrical-clavate, short-stipitate, apically rounded to obtuse, ascal apex with a non-amyloid apical annulus 2–2.5 μm wide, 1.5(–2) μm high. Ascospores 12–16(–17.5) × 3–4 μm (mean ± SD = 13.9 ± 0.9 × 3.5 ± 0.2 µm), fusiform, straight or slightly curved, hyaline, 3-septate, smooth, 2-seriate in the ascus.

Figure 4. 

Catenularia cubensis A ascomata accompanied by conidiophores and capitate hyphae B, J conidia C, D tufts of conidiophores with scattered capitate hyphae E–I conidiophores K–M asci with ascospores. Images: S.M.H. 3258 (A, H–J), PRM 825347 holotype (B–D, F, G, K–M); PRA-19884 (E); on natural substrate (A–G, K–M); in culture (H–J). Scale bars: 200 μm (A); 10 μm (B, E–M); 25 μm (C, D).

Specimens examined

Costa Rica • Guanacaste, Liberia ACG, Sector Santa Maria, Estacion Biologica, trail to Bosque Encantado; 10.7647N, -85.3033W; alt. 750 m; on 5 cm diam branch on ground; 26 Jun. 1997; S.M. Huhndorf (S.M.H. 3258). Costa Rica • Alajuela, Cantón Upala, District Bijagua, Heliconias Station, Heliconias trail; 10.7081N, -85.0453W; on 25 cm diam log on ground; alt. 1190 m; 12 Jul. 2001; S.M. Huhndorf, F.A. Fernández, A.N. Miller & M. Darin (S.M.H. 4454). Cuba – Isla de la Juventud (Isla de Pinos) • Sierra de Casas, in a valley near El Abra, 2 km SW of Nueva Gerona; on dead trunk of Palmaceae; 22 Jan. 1981; V. Holubová-Jechová (holotype PRM 825347). Cuba – Isla de la Juventud (Isla de Pinos) • in forest near village Caryo Piedra; on wood of a trunk of a deciduous tree; 21 Jan. 1981; V. Holubová-Jechová (PRA-19884).

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on decaying wood of palm Euterpe oleracea and other hosts in Brazil, Cuba and Costa Rica (Holubová-Jechová 1982; De Castro et al. 2011; Miller and Huhndorf, unpubl.; this study), and on fallen leaves in India (Dubey and Pandey 2017).

Notes

The description is based on Cuban collections. In the Costa Rican material, conidia were 6–8.5 μm long, 3–5 µm wide at the widest point, 1.5–2 µm wide at the basal hilum, brown to dark brown, broadly obovoid or cuneiform, asci 60–80 × 7–9 µm, ascospores 12–20 × 3–5 µm, fusiform, 3-septate (Huhndorf and Miller, unpubl.). For additional details, see Holubová-Jechová (1982).

Catenularia cubensis closely resembles C. angulospora; for comparison see notes for the latter species. Catenularia minor can also be compared with C. cubensis, but differs in longer and wider conidia (6.5–)7.5–10.5(–13) × 6.5–11.5 μm with 3–5 blunt corners and conidiophores that form two distinct layers.

Catenularia cupulifera (Berk. & Broome) Réblová & A.N. Mill., comb. nov.

MycoBank No: 839463
Fig. 5

Basionym. Sphaeria cupulifera Berk. & Broome, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 4, 7: 435. 1871.

Synonyms. Lasiosphaeria cupulifera (Berk. & Broome) Cooke & Plowr., Grevillea 7(43): 85. 1879.

Chaetosphaeria cupulifera (Berk. & Broome) Sacc., Syll. fung. 2: 94. 1883.

Psilonia cuneiformis Richon, Bull. Soc. Sci. Vitry-le-Franç. 8: 219. 1877.

Monotospora cuneiformis (Richon) Sacc., Syll. fung. 4: 300. 1886.

Psiloniella cuneiformis (Richon) Costantin, Mucéd. Simpl.: 86. 1888.

Catenularia cuneiformis (Richon) E.W. Mason, Mycol. Pap. 5: 121. 1941.

Catenularia simplex Grove, Syll. fung. 4: 303. 1886.

Psilonia simplex (Grove) Costantin, Mucéd. Simpl.: 86. 1888.

Synonymy adopted from Mason (1971) and Booth (1958).

Description

Colonies on natural substrate effuse, hairy or tufted, dark brown to black, mycelium partly immersed, partly superficial, brown; colonies composed of conidiophores, capitate hyphae and sometimes ascomata. Anamorph. Conidiophores 100–350(–530) × 6–7.5(–8) μm, 8.5–10.5 wide above the base, macronematous, solitary or in tufts, with dark brown stromatic hyphal cells around the bases, erect, straight or flexuous, unbranched, brown to dark brown, thick-walled, slightly paler towards the apex. Capitate hyphae 110–160 × 5.5–6 μm, 6.5–7 μm wide above the base, scattered among the conidiophores, erect, straight, brown to dark brown, paler towards the apex, apical cell sterile, thin-walled, subhyaline, slightly swollen, ca. 7 μm wide, broadly rounded with a hyaline gelatinous cap that disappears with age. Conidiogenous cells 40–59 × 5.5–6.5 μm, not tapering, terminal, integrated, monophialidic, extending percurrently, cylindrical, brown, producing conidia successively; collarettes 9.5–12.5 μm wide and 10–12.5 μm deep, funnel-shaped, brown, slightly roughened, with an irregularly frayed margin. Conidia (9–)10.5–13.5 μm long, 7–9.5 μm wide at the apical end, 3.5–4.5 μm wide at the basal hilum (mean ± SD = 11.8 ± 0.7 × 8.0 ± 0.6 μm × 4.0 ± 0.3 μm), cuneiform in side view, with (3–)4(–5) blunt corners when viewed from above, flattened to broadly rounded at the apex, truncate at the base, aseptate, fulvous, brown to dark brown, thick-walled, smooth; formed singly, adhered in basipetal chains.

Figure 5. 

Catenularia cupulifera A, B ascomata accompanied by conidiophores and capitate hyphae C colony composed of conidiophores and capitate hyphae D–F conidiophores G capitate hypha H–J upper parts of conidiophores with conidia K, L conidia M, N asci with ascospores. Images: W7972 (A, B, M); W7973 (C, D, H, I); PRA-19893 (E–G, J–L); JF 99018 (N); on natural substrate (A–N). Scale bars: 500 μm (A–C); 50 μm (D); 25 (E); 20 μm (F–L); 10 μm (M, N).

Teleomorph

Ascomata 150–220 μm diam, 200–250 μm high, superficial with a base immersed, solitary or in groups or densely aggregated forming a crust, conical to subglobose, papillate, dark brown to black, rugose, sometimes covered with conidiophores and capitate hyphae or in a dense subiculum consisting of partly decumbent conidiophores. Ostiole periphysate. Ascomatal wall fragile, carbonaceous, 22–33 μm thick, two-layered. Outer layer consisting of brown, polyhedral to angular cells with opaque walls. Inner layer consisting of several rows of thin-walled, hyaline cells. Paraphyses 3–4 μm wide tapering to 2–2.5 μm, septate, hyaline, longer than the asci. Asci 110–140 × (8–)10–11(–12.5) μm (mean ± SD = 162.2 ± 11.1 × 10.5 ± 1.2 µm), cylindrical-clavate, short-stipitate, apically narrowly rounded to obtuse, ascal apex with a non-amyloid apical annulus 2–2.5(–3) μm wide, ca. 1.5 μm high. Ascospores 21–28.5 × 4.5–5.5 μm (mean ± SD = 25.3 ± 1.7 × 5.5 ± 0.4 µm), fusiform, straight or slightly curved, hyaline, 1–4-septate, smooth, 2-seriate in the ascus.

Specimens examined

Belgium • West Flanders province, Adinkerke, Cabour; on decaying wood of Populus sp.; 21 Oct. 2007; B. Declerque (IFBL D0.16.23). Czech Republic – Moravia • Lanžhot, Ranšpurk National nature reserve; alt. 150 m; on decaying wood of Carpinus betulus; 14. Aug. 1979; V. Holubová-Jechová (PRA-19887) • Ibid.; on decaying wood of Populus alba, 28 Jul. 1970, V. Holubová-Jechová (PRA-19888) • Ibid.; on decaying wood Quercus robur, 28. Aug. 1976, V. Holubová-Jechová (PRA-19889). Czech Republic – Moravia • Bílé Karpaty, Velká Javořina Mt. near Kamenná Bouda; alt. 660 m; on decaying wood of a branch of Fagus sylvatica; 27 Jul. 1970; V. Holubová-Jechová (PRA-19886). France – Ariège • Pyreneés Mts., Rimont, Las Muros, alt. 480 m; on decaying wood of Fraxinus excelsior; 4 Feb. 1999; J. Fournier J.F. 99018 (PRA-19890). France – Ariège • Pyreneés Mts., Rimont, Las Muros, valley of the Peyrau brook, alt. 400 m; on decaying wood of Buxus sempervivens; 9 Nov. 1999, J. Fournier J.F. 99261 (PRA-19892) • Ibid.; on decaying wood of Salix caprea; 12 Mar. 2000; J. Fournier J.F. 00026 (PRA-19891). France – Ariège • Pyrénées Mts., Rimont, La Maille brook; alt. 550 m; on submerged wood; 28 May 2018; J. Fournier M.R. 4104 (PRA-19893). Slovak Republic • Brezová near Senica; on decaying wood of a trunk of Salix alba; 6 Aug. 1976; V. Holubová-Jechová (PRA-19885). United Kingdom – Somerset • Langridge, on decaying wood of roots of Ulmus sp.; Apr. 1869; C.E. Broome (holotype of S. cupulifera K(M) 57177). United Kingdom • on decaying wood; 14 Apr. 1873; ex Herbarium C.E. Broome 1886 (W 7972) • Ibid.; ex Herbarium C.E. Broome 1886, no. 366 (W 7973).

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on decaying wood of Carpinus betulus, Fagus sylvatica, Fraxinus excelsior, Hedera sp., Ilex sp., Quercus sp., Salix alba, Ulmus sp. and other unknown hosts. Most of the records originate from Europe in Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Slovak Republic and the United Kingdom (Berkeley and Broome 1871; Hughes 1965; Holubová-Jechová 1973; this study). Hughes (1965) suggested that C. cupulifera is apparently only known from Europe. However, findings of this species also come from other continents. Catenularia cupulifera has been reported from foam in a river in Venezuela (Fernández and Smits 2018), wood of Ulmus americana in the USA, Illinois (Shim 1969) and decaying leaves of Pandanus sp. in Mauritius (Whitton et al. 2012).

Notes

Our observations of the teleomorph-anamorph connection between Ch. cupulifera and C. cuneiformis agree with those of Berkeley and Broome (1871), De Seynes (1886) and Booth (1958). Although this relationship has not yet been verified experimentally, both morphs occur together in nature. Since the anamorph and teleomorph represent two different stages of the life cycle of one organism, we propose a new combination in Catenularia based on Sphaeria cupulifera with C. cuneiformis and C. simplex as synonyms.

Catenularia novae-zelandiae resembles C. cupulifera but differs in larger and rounded-obconic conidia, 11.5–17.5 μm long, 14.5–18.5 μm wide. Both species have conspicuous collarettes with a frayed margin, which is larger in C. novae-zelandiae, 19–27 μm wide and 12.2–19 μm deep, funnel- to cup-shaped.

Catenularia elsikii (M.J. Pound, J.M.K. O’Keefe, N.B. Nuñez Otaño & J.B. Riding) Réblová & A.N. Mill., comb. nov.

MycoBank No: 839464

Basionym. Chaetosphaeria elsikii M.J. Pound, J.M.K. O’Keefe, N.B. Nuñez Otaño & J.B. Riding, Palynology 43: 603. 2019.

Habitat and geographical distribution

On fossil wood, known only in the United Kingdom.

Notes

Catenularia elsikii was isolated from the material containing clay, charcoal and wood fragments present in the cracks of a large sample of fossil wood discovered in the United Kingdom (Pound et al. 2019). Thick-walled, dark brown conidia were the only structure that has been preserved in material dated to the Miocene. In the conidial characteristics, C. elsikii is remarkably similar to C. macrospora known from Canada and New Zealand and C. novae-zelandiae known only from New Zealand. These species share dark brown, rounded-obconic conidia with (3–)4–5 corners when viewed from above. In addition, C. elsikii and C. novae-zelandiae have a visible pore at the basal hilum. Conidia of C. elsikii (23.1–24.4 μm high, 20.8–23.9 μm wide with a basal scar 3–4 μm wide) are longer and wider than those of C. novae-zelandiae, but shorter than those of C. macrospora. For detailed comparison, see notes to the two latter species.

Catenularia kalakadensis Subram. & Bhat, Kavaka 15(1–2): 49. 1989 [1987].

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on decaying wood, known only in China, India and Mexico (Subramanian and Bhat 1989; Heredia et al. 2004; Xia et al. 2013).

Notes

For descriptions and illustrations, refer to Subramanian and Bhat (1989) and Xia et al. (2013). Catenularia kalakadensis is unique among other species in conidia with six blunt corners when viewed from above. It resembles C. cubensis but differs in the absence of capitate hyphae and wider conidia (6–7 μm) with more corners at the apex (Subramanian and Bhat 1989).

Catenularia longispora S. Hughes, N. Z. J. Bot. 3: 141. 1965.

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on decaying wood, known only in New Zealand (Hughes 1965).

Notes

Catenularia longispora is well recognisable by narrowly rounded-obconic, brown to dark brown conidia that are the longest in the genus, 27–45 μm long, 16.8–24 μm wide at the apical end, 7–10 μm wide at the basal hilum, with usually three blunt corners when viewed from above (Hughes 1965).

Catenularia macrospora S. Hughes, N. Z. J. Bot. 3: 143. 1965.

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on decaying bark and wood of Dacrydium cupressinum, Fuscospora cliffortioides, Vitex lucens and other unknown hosts, known in Canada and New Zealand (Hughes 1965).

Notes

Catenularia macrospora has broadly obovoid to rounded-obconic, brown to dark brown conidia, 21–28 μm long, 19–28 μm wide at the apical end and 4–7 μm wide at the basal hilum, with (3–)4(–5) blunt corners when seen from above (Hughes 1965). The conidial length is comparable with those of C. longispora and C. elsikii, but the former species differs in conidia narrowly rounded-obconic, narrower at the apical end (16.8–24 μm) with only (2–)3 corners. Although the length of conidia of C. elsikii and C. macrospora overlap and the number of corners is comparable, conidia of C. elsikii are slightly shorter and narrower in their upper range (23–24.5 × 21–24 μm) and narrower at the truncate base (3–4 μm) (Pound et al. 2019).

Catenularia malabarica Subram. & Bhat, Kavaka 15(1–2): 49. (1989) [1987].

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on decaying wood of Magnolia liliifera and an unknown host, known only in India and Thailand (Subramanian and Bhat 1989; Kodsueb et al. 2008).

Notes

For descriptions and illustrations, see Subramanian and Bhat (1989). Catenularia malabrica produces one of the tallest conidiophores in the genus, 320–620 × 6–11 μm arising singly or in tufts. It resembles C. novae-zelandiae in dark brown conidia with 4–5 corners, but conidia of C. malabrica are wider (18–21 μm) and the capitate hyphae are absent.

Catenularia minor (Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & A.N. Mill., comb. nov.

MycoBank No: 839465
Fig. 6

Basionym. Catenularia cuneiformis var. minor Hol.-Jech., Česká Mykol. 37: 14. 1983.

Synonym. Chaetosphaeria trianguloconidia Réblová & Seifert, Sydowia 55: 333. 2003.

Description

Colonies on the natural substrate effuse, tufted or hairy, dark brown to black, mycelium partly immersed, partly semi-immersed, pale brown to brown; colonies composed of conidiophores, capitate hyphae and sometimes ascomata. Anamorph. Conidiophores macronematous, solitary or arise in tufts, with dark brown stromatic hyphal cells around the base, erect, straight or flexuous, unbranched, thick-walled, paler towards the apex, forming two layers. Conidiophores of the lower layer 95–212 × 3.5–4.5(–5) μm, 4.5–5.5(–8.5) μm wide above the base, pale brown to brown; conidiophores of the upper layer 260–527 × 4.5–7 μm long, 7.5–10 μm wide above the base, dark brown. Capitate hyphae 122–186 × 3.5–5 μm, 5–5.5 μm wide above the base, scattered among the conidiophores, erect, straight, brown, extending percurrently, paler towards the apex, apical cell subhyaline, slightly swollen, 3.5–4 μm wide, broadly rounded, thin-walled; the hyaline gelatinous cap was not observed. Conidiogenous cells 15–40 × 3.5–5.5 μm tapering to 2.5–3 μm below the collarette, integrated, terminal, monophialidic, extending percurrently, cylindrical to slightly lageniform, pale brown to brown, producing conidia successively; collarettes 3.5–5(–6) μm wide, 1.5–2.5 μm deep, shallow, funnel-shaped, pale brown to subhyaline, smooth, margin entire. Conidia (6.5–)7.5–10.5(–13) μm long, 6.5–11.5 μ wide at the apical end, 1.5–2.5 μm wide at the base (mean ± SD = 8.9 ± 0.9 × 9.0 ± 1.2 × 2.1 ± 0.2 μm), cuneiform to rounded-obconic to obtriangular in side view, with 3–5 blunt corners when viewed from above, broadly rounded to flattened at the apex, truncate at the basal scar with a central pore, aseptate, pale brown to dark brown, thick-walled, smooth; formed singly, adhered in basipetal chains or clusters. Teleomorph. Ascomata 230–250 μm diam, 250–275 μm high, superficial, solitary or densely aggregated, subglobose to globose, covered by a whitish-grey powder except for the black glabrous papilla; the powdery covering is ca. 5–15 μm thick, disappearing with age, leaving the perithecia dark and glabrous. Ascomata sparsely covered with conidiophores. Ostiole periphysate. Ascomatal wall fragile, carbonaceous, 30–37.5 μm thick, two-layered. Outer layer consisting of dark brown, opaque, thin-walled, polyhedral cells. Inner layer consisting of hyaline, thinner-walled, elongated, compressed cells. Paraphyses 3–4 μm wide, tapering to ca. 2 μm, branching, anastomosing, septate, hyaline, longer than asci. Asci 102–112 × 8–9(–9.5) μm (mean ± SD = 106 ± 1.6 × 8.9 ± 0.2 µm), cylindrical-clavate, short-stipitate, rounded apically, ascal apex with a non-amyloid apical annulus 3 μm diam, 1.5–2 μm high. Ascospores 25–29(–30) × (3.5–)4–4.5 μm (mean ± SD = 27 ± 0.5 × 4 ± 0.7 µm), fusiform, straight or curved, hyaline, 1–3-septate, smooth, 1–2-seriate in the ascus (adapted from Réblová and Seifert 2003).

Figure 6. 

Catenularia minor A, B colonies composed of ascomata, conidiophores and capitate hyphae C ascus with ascospores D–F conidiophores with capitate hyphae G–J upper parts of conidiophores with conidia in chains J capitate hypha K, L conidia (arrow indicates central pore in the basal scar). Images: PRM 828704 holotype of C. minor (D, E, G, K); PRM 900544 holotype of Ch. trianguloconidia (A–C, F, H–J, L); on natural substrate (A–L). Scale bars: 250 μm (A, B); 10 μm (C, G–L); 50 μm (D–F).

Specimens examined

Cuba – Sancti Spiritus province • Soledad, Cienfuegos Province Botanical Garden; on decaying stem of Bambusa vulgaris; 19 Mar. 1981; M.A. Bondarceva & S. Herrera (holotype of C. cuneiformis var. minor PRM 828704). Thailand – Nakhon Nayok Province • Khao Yai National Park, trail to Haew Suwat waterfall, elev. 720 m; on decaying bamboo culm; 2 Sep. 2001; M. Réblová, Gary J. Samuels & R. Nasit M.R. 2186/TH 438 (holotype of Ch. trianguloconidia PRM 900544).

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on dead culms of bamboo, known in Cuba and Thailand (Holubová-Jechová 1983; Réblová and Seifert 2003).

Notes

For characteristics in culture, see Réblová and Seifert (2003). The apparent similarity of C. cuneiformis var. minor (Holubová-Jechová 1983) and Ch. trianguloconidia (Réblová and Seifert 2003) and their habitat on dead bamboo culms prompted a revision of both species. Examination of their holotypes revealed that they are conspecific. Additionally, we discovered capitate hyphae in the type material of both species, although they were not described in the protologues. They are scattered among the conidiophores and easy to overlook. The hyaline gelatinous cap around the swollen apex of the capitate hyphae was not observed. Conidia slightly vary in size and colour, and often smaller and pale brown conidia occur together with slightly larger and darker brown conidia.

Holubová-Jechová (1983) distinguished var. minor from var. cuneiformis (= C. cupulifera, this study) in shorter collarettes, smaller conidia and the absence of capitate hyphae. Based on their different morphology, a new combination for var. minor is proposed at the species level with Ch. trianguloconidia reduced to synonymy.

Catenularia angulospora is similar to C. minor, and it is challenging to distinguish both species, especially if capitate hyphae may rarely occur in some specimens of the latter species. Catenularia angulospora differs in fuscous to brown conidia that are narrower (4.5–6(–7)) μm and the lack of capitate hyphae. Catenularia cupulifera is comparable to C. minor but differs in larger collarettes (9.5–12.5 μm wide and 10–12.5 μm deep) with a frayed margin, and longer (10.5–13.5 μm) conidia that are wider (3.5–4.5 μm) at the basal hilum. Conidia of C. cupulifera are cuneiform in side view, whereas conidia of C. minor are more rounded-obconic to obtriangular.

Catenularia novae-zelandiae (S. Hughes & Shoemaker) Réblová & A.N. Mill., comb. nov.

MycoBank No: 839466
Fig. 7

Basionym. Chaetosphaeria novae-zelandiae S. Hughes & Shoemaker, N. Z. J. Bot. 3: 138. 1965.

Description

Colonies on natural substrate effuse, tufted or velutinous, dark brown, mycelium partly immersed, partly superficial, brown; colonies composed of conidiophores, capitate hyphae and sometimes ascomata. Anamorph. Conidiophores 90–354 × 7.5–9.5 μm, 7–10.5 μm wide near the swollen base, macronematous, solitary or arise in tufts, with dark stromatic hyphal cells around the base, erect, straight or flexuous, unbranched, brown to dark brown, thick-walled. Capitate hyphae 95–215 × 5–7 μm, 6.5–9 μm wide above the base, 4.5–5.5 μm wide at the apex, solitary or in tufts, arise among the conidiophores, erect, straight to slightly flexuous, dark brown, paler towards the apex, apical cell pale brown to subhyaline, slightly swollen, broadly rounded, thin-walled, with a hyaline, mucilaginous cap that disintegrates with age. Conidiogenous cells 22.5–41(–65) × 7–11 μm, 7.5–9.5 μm wide below the collarette, terminal, integrated, monophialidic, extending percurrently, cylindrical, subcylindrical or slightly lageniform, brown, producing conidia successively; collarettes 19–27 μm wide and 12.2–19 μm deep, funnel-shaped or cup-shaped, brown to dark brown, roughened, with a frayed margin, the margin deteriorates, and the collarette becomes reduced in size 11.5–15.8 μm wide and 4.5–6 μm deep. Conidia 11.5–17.5 μm long, 14.5–18.5 μm wide at the apical end, 4–5.5 μm wide at the basal hilum, (mean ± SD = 15.8 ± 1.8 × 15.9 ± 1.3 × 5.5 ± 0.9 μm), cuneiform to rounded-obconic in side view, with 4–5 blunt corners when viewed from above, flattened to broadly rounded at the apex, truncate at the base, aseptate, brown to dark brown, thick-walled, smooth; formed singly, adhered in basipetal chains. Teleomorph. Ascomata 160–210 μm diam, 180–220 μm high, superficial, solitary or in small groups, subglobose to globose, papillate, dark brown, sometimes covered with capitate hyphae and conidiophores; capitate hyphae 80–130 × 5–5.5 μm, erect, simple, apical cell 6–6.5 μm wide, slightly inflated, broadly rounded apically, subhyaline, with a mucilaginous cap that disappears with age. Ostiole periphysate. Ascomatal wall fragile, carbonaceous, 17–22 μm thick, two-layered. Outer layer consisting of dark brown, polyhedral to angular cells with opaque walls. Inner layer consisting of rows of thin-walled, hyaline cells. Paraphyses 4–5 μm wide tapering to 1.5–2 μm, septate, hyaline, longer than the asci. Asci 102–130 × 11–13 μm (mean ± SD = 117.6 ± 9.8 × 12.3 ± 0.8 µm), 74–100(–110) μm in the sporiferous part (mean ± SD = 83.7 ± 12 µm), cylindrical-clavate, narrowly truncate apically, ascal apex with a non-amyloid apical annulus 3.5–4 μm wide, ca. 2 μm high. Ascospores 22–28(–30) × 4–5 μm (mean ± SD = 25.6 ± 1.6 × 4.7 ± 0.4 µm), fusiform, straight or slightly curved, hyaline, 3-septate, smooth, 2-seriate in the ascus.

Figure 7. 

Catenularia novae-zelandiae A ascomata B colony composed of conidiophores and capitate hyphae C, D, O, P conidiophores E capitate hypha arising among conidiophores F–I upper parts of conidiophores with conidia (arrow indicates central pore at the basal scar) J, K conidia in chain (arrow indicates appendages) L, M asci with ascospores and paraphyses N capitate hypha arising from the ascomal wall Q conidia. Images: PDD 81883 (A–C, F–I, L–Q); PDD 119362 (D, E, J, K); on natural substrate (A–N); in PCA culture after 2 wk (O–Q). Scale bars: 250 μm (A, B); 50 μm (C–E); 20 μm (F–Q).

Characteristics in culture

On PCA: colonies 8–12 mm in 14d, circular, flat, margin entire, subsurface, aerial mycelium scarce, cobwebby to mucoid, beige-brown, reverse of the same colour. Sporulation was abundant, sporulating conidiophores developed from aerial mycelium and occasionally from immersed vegetative hyphae.

Colonies on PCA effuse, hairy, vegetative mycelium subhyaline to hyaline, 2–3 μm wide. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia similar to those from nature. Conidiophores 31–120 × 6–7 μm, solitary or arise in tufts of 2–7, erect, straight, pale brown, 1–several-septate. Capitate hyphae absent. Conidiogenous cells 22–37 × 8–10 μm, tapering to ca. 7 μm below the collarette; collarettes 12.5–15 μm wide, 4–6(–8) μm deep, funnel-shaped, pale brown to dark brown, slightly roughened with a frayed to entire margin. Conidia (13–)14–18 μm long, 13–18 μm wide at the apical end, 4.5–6 μm wide basal hilum (mean ± SD = 15.2 ± 1.2 ×14.7 ± 1.4 µm × 5.5 ± 0.9 µm), broadly rounded-obconic in side view, aseptate, brown to grey-brown, thick-walled, smooth, formed singly, adhered in short basipetal chains.

Specimens examined

New Zealand – Auckland region • Auckland district, Upper Piha Valley, Waitākere Ranges, Home track; on decaying wood of Metrosideros robusta; 9 Oct. 1963; J.M. Dingley (holotype PDD 21603, isotype DAOM 93575). New Zealand – West Coast region • Westland district, Otira, Kelly Shelter, Cockayane Nature Walk; on decaying wood; 16 Mar. 2003; M. Réblová MR 2846/NZ 362 (PDD 81883). New Zealand – West Coast region • Buller district, Victoria Forest Park, Reefton, Big River Inanganua track ca. 14 km; on decaying wood of Nothofagus sp.; 6 Mar. 2003; M. Réblová MR 2723/ NZ 224A (PDD 119362).

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on decaying wood of Coprosma lucida, Coprosma spp., Freycinetia banksii, Griselinia lucida, Leptospermum ericoides, Metrosideros robusta, Neopanax arboreum, Nothofagus sp., Olearia rani, Weinmannia racemosa and other unknown hosts, known only in New Zealand (Hughes 1965; this study).

Notes

The specimen PDD 81883 of C. novae-zelandiae was isolated in axenic culture (Fig. 7O–Q). In vitro, conidia were paler than those from nature and broadly rounded-obconic. Unfortunately, the isolate is no longer viable. The other collection PDD 119362 has conidia slightly larger 17.5–21 × 18–19 μm, 5–6 μm wide at the truncate base. In both specimens, we observed several conidia with minute hyaline appendages arising from the pale, circular, thin-walled areas in the cell wall (Fig. 7K).

Catenularia malabarica (Subramanian and Bhat 1989) is similar to C. novae-zelandiae in characters of conidia, but differs in the absence of capitate hyphae, longer conidiophores up to 620 μm long and conidiogenous cells with a shallow, funnel-shaped collarette without a frayed margin.

Chalarodes McKenzie, Mycotaxon 42: 89. 1991.

Description

Colonies on natural substrate effuse, hairy, mycelium partly superficial, partly immersed; colonies composed of conidiophores and sometimes ascomata. Anamorph. Setae present, mostly associated with ascomata, simple, brown, apically rounded. Conidiophores mononematous, macronematous, solitary, erect, septate, unbranched, brown. Conidiogenous cells integrated, terminal, monophialidic, extending percurrently, cylindrical-lageniform to urceolate, brown; collarettes funnel-shaped, pale brown. Conidia obpyramidal, in side view cuneiform, obovoid to obtriangular, with angular outline when viewed from above, truncate at the basal scar, with a simple setula inserted apically at each corner, aseptate, hyaline, adhered in basipetal chains. Teleomorph. Ascomata non-stromatic, perithecial, papillate, dark brown, sparsely covered by setae and conidiophores. Ostiole periphysate. Ascomatal wall fragile, carbonaceous, two-layered. Paraphyses persistent, septate, hyaline, longer than the asci. Asci unitunicate, 8-spored, cylindrical-clavate, ascal apex with a non-amyloid apical annulus. Ascospores fusiform, hyaline, transversely septate.

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobes on dead leaves of Freycinetia spp. (Pandanaceae) and decaying wood, known only in Australasia in New Caledonia and New Zealand (McKenzie 1991; this study).

Notes

The genus Chalarodes, typified with Cha. bisetis, was erected for dematiaceous hyphomycetes observed on leaf litter of Freycinetia spp. in New Zealand and New Caledonia (McKenzie 1991). It is characterised by mononematous, simple, dark brown conidiophores with terminal monophialidic conidiogenous cells extending percurrently and hyaline, aseptate, cuneiform, obconical to obtriangular conidia with setulae, adhered in short basipetal chains. In the protologue (McKenzie 1991), the conidia were described only in the side view with two simple setulae at the apical end. Based on the examination of newly collected material, the conidia have angular outline when viewed from above; they have (3–)4 corners with a setula inserted in each corner. Additionally, we observed sterile setae growing among the conidiophores or on the ascomatal wall. They resemble capitate hyphae of Catenularia, but the mucilaginous sheath around the apex was lacking.

To date, two species, Cha. bisetis and Cha. obconica, have been placed in Chalarodes (McKenzie 1991). A new species, Cha. obpyramidata, inhabiting decaying wood and originating from New Zealand is introduced below. The teleomorph-anamorph connection of Chalarodes is described for the first time. Based on the results of the phylogenetic study, Cha. obpyramidata is closely related to Catenularia.

Chalarodes obpyramidata Réblová, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 839467
Fig. 8

Etymology

Pyramidatus (L), pyramidal, prefix ob- (L), meaning reversely, inversely, referring to the conidial shape.

Type

New Zealand – West Coast region • Westland district, Ross, Totara forest, Totara River valley; on decaying wood of a branch; 7 Mar. 2003; M. Réblová MR 2734/NZ 236 (holotype PDD 119363).

Description

Colonies on natural substrate effuse, hairy, dark brown to black, mycelium partly superficial, partly immersed, brown; colonies composed of conidiophores and sometimes ascomata. Anamorph. Setae present, mostly associated with ascomata (see below). Conidiophores 195–360 × 5–7.5 μm, 7–8.5 μm wide above the base, mononematous, macronematous, solitary, erect, straight or flexuous, unbranched, thick-walled, dark brown, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 20–54 × 5–6.5(–8) μm tapering to 3.5–4.5 μm below the collarette, integrated, terminal, monophialidic, extending percurrently, cylindrical to cylindrical-lageniform, brown, producing conidia successively; collarettes 6–7.5 μm wide, 2.5–3(–4) μm deep, funnel-shaped, pale brown. Conidia 10.5–12 μm long, 8.5–12 μm wide, 2.5–3.5 μm wide at the basal hilum (mean ± SD = 11.2 ± 0.5 × 10.3 ± 1.0 × 2.9 ± 0.3 μm), obpyramidal, in side view cuneiform to obtriangular, with four corners when viewed from above, truncate at the basal scar, with straight or curved setulae inserted at each corner 5–8 μm long, aseptate, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth; formed singly, adhered in basipetal chains. Teleomorph. Ascomata 120–140 μm diam, 130–160 μm high, subglobose, dark brown to black, superficial, solitary or aggregated, subglobose, papillate, setose. Setae 37–157 × 3.5–5.5 μm, simple, straight, cylindrical, brown, pale brown towards the apex, extending percurrently, apical cell sterile, 3.5–4 μm wide, broadly rounded, pale brown to subhyaline, similar setae arise around ascomata on the substrate. Ostiole periphysate. Ascomatal wall fragile, carbonaceous, 20–24 μm thick, two-layered. Outer layer consisting of brown, polyhedral cells with opaque walls. Inner layer consisting of several rows of thin-walled, hyaline cells. Paraphyses 4–5 μm wide, tapering to ca. 2 μm, septate, hyaline, longer than the asci. Asci 95–114 × (9–)10–12 μm (mean ± SD = 103.5 ± 6.5 × 10.9 ± 1.1 µm), cylindrical-clavate, short-stipitate, apically narrowly rounded, ascal apex with a non-amyloid apical annulus ca. 3 μm wide, 2 μm high. Ascospores 18–22(–23) × 4–5 μm (mean ± SD = 20.4 ± 1.3 × 4.4 ± 0.4 µm), fusiform, hyaline, 1–3-septate, smooth, 2-seriate in the ascus.

Figure 8. 

Chalarodes obpyramidata A ascomata B colony composed of conidiophores C, H, O–Q conidiophores D–G, S, T conidia I–L, R upper parts of conidiophores with conidia M asci with ascospores N paraphyses. Images: PDD 119363 (A–L); PDD 119364 (M–T); on natural substrate (A–N); in PCA culture after 4 wk (O–T). Scale bars: 250 μm (A, B); 50 μm (C, H); 10 μm (D–G, M, N, R–T); 20 μm (I–L, O–Q).

Culture characteristics

On PCA: colonies 7–10 mm diam in 14d, circular, raised, margin entire, velvety-lanose, brown to dark grey-brown with whitish-grey conidial masses, reverse black. Sporulation abundant at the centre of the colony.

Colonies on PCA effuse, mycelium subhyaline to pale brown, 2–3 μm wide. Setae absent. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia similar to those from nature. Conidiophores 74–141 × (4.5–)5–6 μm, 5.5–6.5 μm wide above the base, paler brown and less septate than those from nature, erect, straight. Conidiogenous cells 18–40 × 4.5–5.5 μm tapering to 3.5–4 μm below the collarette, cylindrical, pale brown; collarettes 5–6 μm wide, 3.5–4 μm deep, pale brown. Conidia 8–10(–11) μm long, 8–9(–10) μm wide, 2–2.5 μm wide at the hyaline basal hilum (mean ± SD = 9.7 ± 0.9 × 8.4 ± 0.6 × 2.0 ± 0.1 μm), cuneiform to obpyramidal, truncate at the basal scar, setulae not observed, aseptate, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, formed basipetally in chains.

Other specimen examined

New Zealand – West Coast region • Buller district, Victoria Forest Park, Reefton, Big River Inanganua track; on decaying wood of Nothofagus sp. (associated with C. novae-zelandiae PDD 119362 and Zanclospora falcata PDD 119365); 6 Mar. 2003, M. Réblová MR 2724/ NZ 225 (PDD 119364).

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on decaying wood, known only in New Zealand.

Notes

In the size of conidia, our species appears intermediate between Cha. bisetis and Cha. obconica (McKenzie 1991). Chalarodes bisetis differs from Cha. obpyramidata in conidia longer and narrower at the apical end, (9.5–)12–14(–15) × 4.5–6(–9) μm, while Ch. obconica possesses conidia slightly shorter (8–)9–10.5(–11) μm and narrower at the basal hilum 1.75–2 μm.

Fuscocatenula Réblová & A.N. Mill., gen. nov.

MycoBank No: 839468

Etymology

Fuscus (L) dark, brown, dusky, catenula (L), a little chain, referring to pigmented conidia in chains.

Type species

Fuscocatenula submersa (Z.L. Luo, K.D. Hyde & H.Y. Su) Réblová & A.N. Mill.

Description

Colonies effuse, hairy, brown, mycelium partly immersed, partly superficial. Anamorph. Conidiophores macronematous, mononematous, solitary, erect, unbranched, brown to dark brown, thick-walled, paler and thinner-walled towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells integrated, terminal, monophialidic, extending percurrently, cylindrical to lageniform, brown; collarettes funnel-shaped, brown. Conidia cuneiform to obovoid, broadly rounded apically, truncate at the base, aseptate, hyaline when young, pale brown at maturity, with protracted maturation, smooth, formed in a basipetal chain. Teleomorph. Unknown. (Description partly adapted from Li et al. 2017; Luo et al. 2019).

Habitat and geographical distribution

Members of the genus are saprobes on decaying plant matter in terrestrial and freshwater environments, known only in Asia in China.

Notes

Fuscocatenula is proposed as a segregate genus for fungi distantly related from Catenularia (Fig. 2), although morphologically similar. Conidia of Fuscocatenula are obovoid with a truncate base, lack an angular outline and small, circular, thin-walled pale areas in corners that are present in Catenularia. Conidia have a protracted maturation; at first they are hyaline and only later become pale brown, while still attached in a chain. Sometimes the chain consists of hyaline conidia with only one or a few mature pigmented conidia (Li et al. 2017: fig. 1; Luo et al. 2019: fig. 52). In Catenularia, conidia are also hyaline when young but mature soon and when released from the conidiogenous locus they are usually pigmented. Since Catenularia also includes species lacking capitate hyphae, this character alone is not reliable in the distinction of Fuscocatenula from Catenularia.

Two species are accepted in the genus. Li et al. (2017) introduced Catenularia variegata for a foliicolous species from China and Luo et al. (2019) described Chaetosphaeria submersa for a dematiaceous hyphomycete from submerged wood in Thailand. Both species are similar and reminiscent of Catenularia. In the phylogenetic analysis based on ITS-28S sequences, relationship of Ch. submersa and Catenularia was not supported. Molecular data of C. variegata are not available. Based on a detailed comparison of original descriptions and illustrations of both species we conclude that C. variegata is congeneric with Ch. submersa. Therefore, C. variegata is excluded from Catenularia and both species are transferred to the new genus Fuscocatenula.

Fuscocatenula submersa (Z.L. Luo, K.D. Hyde & H.Y. Su) Réblová & A.N. Mill., comb. nov.

MycoBank No: 839469

Basionym. Chaetosphaeria submersa Z.L. Luo, K.D. Hyde & H.Y. Su, Fungal Divers. 99: 585. 2019.

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on submerged decaying wood in stream, known only in China (Luo et al. 2019).

Notes

The species is characterised by conidiophores 380–596(–691) μm × 15–21 μm and cuneiform, pale brown conidia 21–27 × 12–14 μm. The size of these structures clearly distinguishes F. submersa from the small-spored F. variegata with shorter conidiophores (Luo et al. 2019).

Fuscocatenula variegata (H.H. Li & X.G. Zhang) Réblová & A.N. Mill., comb. nov.

MycoBank No: 839470

Basionym. Catenularia variegata H.H. Li & X.G. Zhang, Mycotaxon 132: 621. 2017.

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on dead stems of an unidentified broadleaf tree, known only in China (Li et al. 2017).

Notes

Fuscocatenula variegata resembles F. submersa but differs in shorter conidia 8.5–11 × 5.5–7.5 μm and shorter conidiophores 150–270 × 4.5–8 μm (Li et al. 2017).

Nawawia antennata Réblová, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 839471
Fig. 9

Etymology

Antennatus (L) meaning ‘having antenna(s)’, referring to the presence of conidial appendages resembling insect antennas.

Type

Thailand – Nakhon Nayok Province • Khao Yai National park, Phakrajai trail, on decaying wood and bark of a twig; 17 Aug. 2001; M. Réblová & N. Hywel-Jones M.R. 2056/TH 219 (PRA-20374).

Description

Colonies on natural substrate effuse, hairy, dark brown, mycelium partly superficial, partly immersed, brown. Anamorph. Conidiophores forming two distinct layers; conidiophores of the upper layer 142–282 μm long, conidiophores of the lower layer 44–90 μm long, 5–6 μm wide, 6–8.5 wide above the base, basal cell bulbose with dark brown, thick-walled stromatic cells around the base, mononematous, macronematous, solitary or fasciculate in a group of 2–6, erect, straight or flexuous, unbranched, thick-walled, dark brown, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 19.5–29 × 5.5–7.5(–8) μm tapering to 3–5 μm below the collarette, integrated, terminal, monophialidic, extending percurrently, subcylindrical to lageniform, pale brown; collarettes 5.5–6.5 μm wide, 1.5–2.5 μm deep, funnel-shaped, pale brown. Conidia 14–17(–18) μm long, 11–14.5(–15.5) μm wide, 2.5–3.5 μm wide at the basal hilum (mean ± SD = 15.5 ± 1.2 × 12.9 ± 1.7 × 2.9 ± 0.3 μm), turbinate to obpyramidal, in side view cuneiform to obtriangular, truncate at the basal scar, flattened to slightly concave at the apical end, with (3–)4 corners when viewed from above, aseptate, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, with simple setulae inserted at each corner, 17–43 μm long, 7.5–20 μm long when the ends are coiled, conidia accumulate in slimy droplets. Teleomorph. Not observed.

Figure 9. 

Nawawia antennata (PRA-20374 holotype) A, B colony C–G conidiophores H stromatic cells I–P conidia. Images: on natural substrate (A–P). Scale bars: 250 μm (A, B); 20 μm (C, F, G); 25 μm (D, E); 10 μm (H–N).

Habitat and geographical distribution

Saprobe on decaying wood, known only in Thailand.

Notes

We were unsuccessful in obtaining N. antennata in axenic culture. The species exhibits diagnostic characteristics of Nawawia such as pigmented, mononematous conidiophores with stromatic cells around the base, terminal monophialides extending percurrently and hyaline, aseptate, obtriangular conidia with an angular outline and several simple setulae at the apex. Conidia accumulate in a slimy head. Conidiophores forming two distinct layers were also documented in N. quadrisetulata (Goh et al. 2014: figs 2, 3).

Among Nawawia species, N. antennata is well distinguished by coiled appendages and the size of conidia. Nawawia quadrisetulata is similar to the new species in conidia with mostly four angles at the apex but differs in larger conidia (30–37.5 × 22.5–32.5 μm) with longer setulae (30–57.5 μm). Nawawia antennata resembles N. filiformis (Marvanová 1980) but the latter species has conidia wider at the apex (14–18 μm) and straight appendages.

Discussion

In this study, we have reviewed the generic concept of Catenularia and its relationships with morphologically similar genera with catenate conidia using molecular and phenotypic data. The conidial characteristics, such as the colour at maturity, the outline in transverse section and presence or absence of the setulae are the main taxonomic criteria at the generic rank for distinguishing between Catenularia, Chalarodes and Fuscocatenula. Their conidia are formed successively; they are solitary and adhere in basipetal chains. These genera are compared with Nawawia, Obeliospora and Phialosporostilbe, which have similar conidia in slimy heads.

Although molecular DNA data of C. cupulifera are not available, four other morphologically similar species accepted in Catenularia were included in the analysis of ITS and 28S sequence data. Catenularia was resolved as a monophyletic strongly supported clade. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that Chaetosphaeria (Tulasne and Tulasne 1863), based on Ch. innumera with the Chloridium botryoideum anamorph (Gams and Holubová-Jechová 1976), is a phylogenetically distinct genus (Fig. 2). Therefore, Catenularia is proposed as the generic name for a morphologically well-delimited group of species whose teleomorphs were previously attributed to Chaetosphaeria. The correct epithet of the type species of Catenularia is ‘cupulifera’ based on Sphaeria cupulifera 1871, the earliest available epithet at the species rank; C. cuneiformis 1877 and C. simplex 1886 are reduced to synonymy. Catenularia is delimited to fungi with pigmented conidiophores arising singly or in tufts, usually accompanied by capitate hyphae, terminal monophialidic conidiogenous cells extending percurrently and flared collarettes. Conidia are pigmented, aseptate, thick-walled, formed successively from the conidiogenous locus and usually adhere in chains. They are cuneiform to rounded-obconic in side view with several blunt corners when viewed from above, each with a small, thin-walled, pore-like area. The associated teleomorphs have perithecial ascomata, unitunicate 8-spored asci, persistent paraphyses and hyaline, fusiform, transversely septate ascospores. Catenularia grows on decaying bamboo culms and bark and wood of various hosts in terrestrial or freshwater habitats worldwide.

Eleven species are accepted in Catenularia, four of which have been verified with molecular DNA data. One of the accepted species, C. elsikii, is a fossil fungus. The conidia were preserved in a sample of fossil wood, dated to the Miocene, found in the United Kingdom (Pound et al. 2019). The substrate indicates a similar habitat as in the current species. Microscopic fossil fungi are difficult to identify, especially when only spores or fragments of reproductive structures are preserved (Taylor et al. 2015). Fortunately, Catenularia conidia represent a distinctive morphotype, which allows reliable identification. The majority of species of the Chaetosphaeriaceae have hyaline, thin-walled conidia and ascospores, which will likely disintegrate in the fossilized samples. On the other hand, thick-walled and heavily pigmented fungal reproductive structures are randomly present in fossil material (Pound et al. 2019). Apart from Catenularia, Adautomilanezia (Crous et al. 2016), Ellisembia, Stanjehughesia (Subramanian 1992), and Sporoschisma (Berkeley and Broome 1871; Hughes 1966) of the Chaetosphaeriaceae also have thick-walled and melanised conidia that may occur in fossil material or palynological preparations.

Hughes (1965) suggested that conidia of Catenularia may germinate through the inconspicuous, thin-walled areas in the cell wall in corners. In the newly recorded specimens of C. novae-zelandiae, we observed several conidia with rudimentary hyaline appendages growing from these pore-like areas (Fig. 7K). This feature has not been recorded in any other Catenularia species. However, we rule out the possibility that these appendages are germinating tubes after comparing the figure in Luo et al. (2019: figure 47l) depicting germinating conidium. The presence of rudimentary conidial appendages in Catenularia may reflect its newly revealed phylogenetic relationship.

In the ITS-28S phylogeny, Chalarodes was shown as a sister to Catenularia with high statistical support. Their close relationship is also supported by similar morphologies. Chalarodes differs from Catenularia in conidia that are hyaline at maturity and have simple setulae at the apical end. Although McKenzie (1991) described conidia of two Chalarodes species from the side view only, examination of our material revealed that the conidia are turbinate to obpyramidal with an angular outline. The discovery of rudimentary setulae in C. novae-zelandiae provides a new perspective on this characteristic. Although setulae persist in Chalarodes, the appendages in Catenularia were lost during evolution or never evolved, except in the discovered case. However, the systematic placement of C. novae-zelandiae has yet to be confirmed with DNA sequence data. Our observations of Cha. obpyramidata in culture (Fig. 8O–T) correspond to those of Marvanová (1980) on Nawawia filiformis. In both species, conidia that formed in culture lack setulae.

Fuscocatenula is proposed for fungi similar to Catenularia and readily distinguished by pigmented conidia with protracted maturation, round in transverse section, lacking minute pore-like areas at the apical end, and the absence of capitate hyphae. In the phylogenetic analysis, Fuscocatenula was shown as a separate lineage, related to several Chaetosphaeria with hyaline or slightly pigmented conidia formed singly or in chains (Gams and Holubová-Jechová 1976). Its closest relatives are Ch. mangrovei with an unknown conidial state, and Ch. innumera. Chloridium botryoideum, the anamorph of Ch. innumera, forms hyaline ellipsoidal conidia arranged in imbricate chains or large heads on sympodially elongating conidiogenous cells. Phaeostalagmus cyclosporus and two Chaetosphaeria species with Chloridium anamorphs are shown as a sister subclade to Fuscocatenula. Chloridium clavaeforme and Chl. phaeophorum belong to the section Gongromeriza and resemble Fuscocatenula in slightly pigmented, short-cuneiform or dacryoid conidia forming chains or slimy droplets. Phaeostalagmus, on the other hand, represents a different phenotype. Its conidiophores are branched with lateral or terminal monophialides producing hyaline, ellipsoidal conidia in slimy heads.

Capitate hyphae (Hughes 1949) are a prominent characteristic that occurs in several members of the Chaetosphaeriaceae. They accompany conidiophores of Catenularia and Sporoschisma; they are scattered on the substrate or more frequently grow in tufts among the conidiophores or on ascomata of their teleomorphs. Capitate hyphae also occur on ascomata of Ch. capitata, the teleomorph of Exserticlava vasiformis, and Ch. conirostris (Sivanesan and Chang 1995; Fernández and Huhndorf 2005). Similar setae with a swollen apical cell but without the mucilaginous cap were observed on and around ascomata of the teleomorph of Cha. obpyramidata (this study). The presence of analogous structures have been described in the teleomorph of Stanjehughesia (Réblová 1999); they cover ascomata and their apical part, separated by a septum, is formed by an amorphous, subhyaline, clavate to almost triangular globule. All these genera, except for Sporoschisma, clustered as members of a robust clade at the base of the family tree.

Because of its mononematous conidiophores and hyaline, tetrahedral conidia with setulae arranged in corners at the apical end, Chalarodes appears similar to Nawawia (Marvanová 1980). Nawawia encompasses aero-aquatic fungi that form effuse, hairy colonies on decaying wood, bamboo culms and petioles. It is distinguished from Chalarodes by conidia that do not adhere in chains; instead they are single or accumulate in heads at the tip of the conidiogenous cells. Conidiophores often have small stromatic hyphal cells around the base. Nawawia accommodates five species of which only four, namely N. antennata, N. filiformis, N. quadrisetula, N. sasae-kurilensis, correspond to the generic concept based on N. filiformis (Marvanová 1980; Mel’nik and Hyde 2006; Goh et al. 2014; this study). The new species N. antennata resembles N. quadrisetula (Goh et al. 2014) in characters of conidiophores and conidia but differs in that the conidia are smaller and the setulae are coiled. Unfortunately, living culture or molecular data are not available to confirm its relationships. Nawawia oviformis (Peng et al. 2016) does not fit the circumscription of the genus; it has conidia with a round outline in transverse section with setulae arranged irregularly over the whole surface. These characteristics are typical of Bahusutrabeeja (Subramanian and Bhat 1977) and N. oviformis would be better placed in this genus. In the ITS-28S phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2), Nawawia and Bahusutrabeeja form separate lineages. Three species originally attributed to Nawawia have been reclassified and placed in other genera as Neonawawia malaysiana (Yang et al. 2018), Obeliospora nitida (Cantillo-Pérez et al. 2018) and Phialosporostilbe dendroidea (Yang et al. 2018). Neonawawia is particularly interesting by its formation of sporodochial conidiomata and hyaline to light brown conidiophores; it resembles Nawawia only in the characteristics of conidia. Based on phylogenetic evidence, its placement has been confirmed outside the Chaetosphaeriaceae (Yang et al. 2018).

Hyaline, turbinate conidia with an angular outline and apical setulae represent an uncommon morphotype in the Chaetosphaeriaceae. Apart from Chalarodes and Nawawia, similar conidia borne on monophialides occur only in species of Phialosporostilbe. The latter genus is distantly related to both genera and is distinguished by synnematous conidiophores associated with setae, conidial setulae occasionally formed at the base and a chloridium-like synanamorph (Mercado Sierra and Mena Portales 1985; Bhat and Kendrick 1993). The synnemata are indeterminate and although in most species the stalk is formed by compact conidiophores that climb upwards along the seta and diverge at their fertile apices, the arrangement of conidiophores of P. gregariclavata (Shirouzu and Harada 2004) is unusual within the genus. The central setiform conidiophore is accompanied by a group of shorter, parallel conidiophores that are solitary or tightly adhering to each other and may fuse. Therefore, the conidiophores of P. gragariclava may be interpreted as a poorly developed synnemata (Shirouzu and Harada 2004: fig. 10). In the characters of conidiophores, P. gregariclavata resembles members of Nawawia.

In characteristics of conidia, Chalarodes, Nawawia and Phialosporostilbe are comparable with Obeliospora, whose systematic placement remains unknown. The genus was emended by Cantillo-Pérez et al. (2018) and is readily distinguished by the absence of stromatic hyphal cells, and the presence of dark acute setae accompanied by monilioid conidiophores with terminal doliiform conidiogenous cells and flared, cup- or funnel-shaped collarettes. The conidia vary in shape ranging from round-tetrahedral, conical, pyramidal to subglobose and are hyaline, although in some species older conidia become light brown.

Although we emphasised characteristics of conidia in chains or heads to support delimitation of Catenularia, Chalarodes and Nawawia, we should look at this diagnostic trait with caution. For example, in C. minor conidia adhere in chains but in older parts of the colony conidia may form clusters. The chains break into smaller fragments, which appear as a cluster at the tip of the conidiogenous cell. In microscopic preparation, the chains readily break up into solitary conidia (Fig. 6E, L). A similar variability occurs in Phialosporostilbe. Although the majority of species have conidia arranged in slimy heads, the conidia of P. catenata form chains (Sureshkumar et al. 2005). Réblová et al. (2011) discussed this phenomenon using the example of Monilochaetes camelliae observed with an ESEM (Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope). The authors showed that there is a continuum from conidial chains to slimy heads on the phialides in culture. Chloridium is another example, e.g. Chl. clavaeforme and Chl. virescens, in which chains, cirrhi, and slimy heads can all be observed in one species in culture (Gams and Holubová-Jechová 1976; pers. obs.). It is apparently caused by the osmolarity of the medium that may affect the proportion between chains and heads.

The present investigation contributes to the knowledge of Catenularia and similar fungi with catenate conidia placed in the Chaetosphaeriaceae. Sampling of other species in the genera Catenularia, Chalarodes, Nawawia and Phialosporostilbe, which have not yet been verified by molecular data, are needed to address their systematic placement.

Acknowledgements

Peter Johnston is thanked for his assistance to M.R. in obtaining the Manaaki Whenua Fellowship and collecting permits for New Zealand. Genevieve Tocci (FH) is thanked for her assistance to M.R. in revising the holotype of C. angulospora. We thank Sabine Huhndorf for the use of her collections and DNA extracts. We thank Jacques Fournier and Bernard Declerque for valuable collections of Catenularia and Sporoschisma. Curators of herbaria, Jan Holec (PRM), Anton Igersheim (W), Ludmila Kirschnerová (PRA), Scott Redhead (DAOM) and Adrienne Stanton (PDD), are acknowledged for assistance with obtaining herbarium loans and depositing new herbarium material. We thank Konstanze Bensch and Shaun Pennycook for their grammatical review of new names. We thank Kazuaki Tanaka for discussion on Phialosporostilbe.

This study was supported by the project of the Czech Science Foundation (GAČR 20-14840S), and as long-term research development projects of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany (RVO 67985939) (M.R.) and the University Hospital Hradec Králové MH CZ – DRO (UHHK, 00179906) (J.N.). This study was also supported by a National Science Foundation award (DEB-0515558) to A.N.M. The Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign is thanked for sequencing services. The field work of M.R. in New Zealand was partly supported by Studienstiftung für mykologische Systematik und Ökologie (2003) and Manaaki Whenua Fellowship, Landcare Research Auckland (2005). The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

  • Arx JA von (1970) The genera of fungi sporulating in pure culture. Verlag J. Cramer, Lehre, 288 pp.
  • Bhat DJ, Kendrick WB (1993) Twenty-five new conidial fungi from the Western Ghats and the Andaman Islands (India). Mycotaxon 49: 19–90.
  • Booth C (1957) Studies of Pyrenomycetes: I. Four species of Chaetosphaeria, two with Catenularia conidia. II. Melanopsamma pomiformis and its Stachybotrys conidia. Mycological Papers 68: 1–27.
  • Booth C (1958) The genera Chaetosphaeria and Thaxteria in Britain. The Naturalist London: 83–90.
  • Cantillo-Pérez T, Oliveira Fiuza P, Mena-Portales J, Gusmão LFP (2017) [2018]. Emendation of the genus Obeliospora: new species, combinations and new records from Brazil. Nova Hedwigia 106: 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2017/0439
  • Clements FE, Shear CL (1931) Genera of Fungi. H.W. Wilson Company, New York, 496 pp.
  • Costantin JN (1888) Les Mucédinées Simples. Histoire, Classification, Culture et Rôle des Champignons Inférieurs dans les Maladies des Végétaux et des Animaux. i–viii. P. Klincksieck, Paris, 210 pp.
  • Crous PW, Verkley GJM, Groenewald JZ, Houbraken J (2019) Fungal biodiversity. CBS laboratory manual series 1. CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, 425 pp.
  • Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Burgess TI, Hardy GEStJ, Crane C, Barrett S, Cano-Lira JF, Le Roux JJ, Thangavel R, Guarro J, Stchigel AM, Martín MP, Alfredo DS, Barber PA, Barreto RW, Baseia IG, Cano-Canals J, Cheewangkoon R, Ferreira RJ, Gené J, Lechat C, Moreno G, Roets F, Shivas RG, Sousa JO, Tan YP, Wiederhold NP, Abell SE, Accioly T, Albizu JL, Alves JL, Antoniolli ZI, Aplin N, Araújo J, Arzanlou M, Bezerra JDP, Bouchara J-P, Carlavilla JR, Castillo A, Castroagudín VL, Ceresini PC, Claridge GF, Coelho G, Coimbra VRM, Costa LA, da Cunha KC, da Silva SS, Daniel R, de Beer ZW, Dueñas M, Edwards J, Enwistle P, Fiuza PO, Fournier J, García D, Gibertoni TB, Giraud S, Guevara-Suárez M, Gusmão LFP, Haituk S, Heykoop M, Hirooka Y, Hofmann TA, Houbraken J, Hughes DP, Kautmanová I, Koppel O, Koukol O, Larsson E, Latha KPD, Lee DH, Lisboa DO, Lisboa WS, López-Villalba Á, Maciel JLN, Manimohan P, Manjón JL, Marincowitz S, Marney TS, Meijer M, Miller AN, Olariaga I, Paiva LM, Piepenbring M, Poveda-Molero JC, Raj KNA, Raja HA, Rougeron A, Salcedo I, Samadi R, Santos TAB, Scarlett K, Seifert KA, Shuttleworth LA, Silva GA, Silva M, Siqueira JPZ, Souza-Motta CM, Stephenson SL, Sutton DA, Tamakeaw N, Telleria MT, Valenzuela-Lopez N, Viljoen A, Visagie CM, Vizzini A, Wartchow F, Wingfield BD, Yurchenko E, Zamora JC, Groenewald JZ (2016) Fungal Planet description sheets: 469–557. Persoonia 37: 218–403. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158516X694499
  • De Castro CC, Hernández Gutiérrez A, Maria Pontes Sotão HM (2011) Novos registros de fungos anamorfos (hifomicetos) para o Neotrópico e América do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Botanica 34: 515–521. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042011000400005
  • De Seynes J (1886) Recherches pour Servir a l’Histoire Naturelle des Vegetaux Inferieurs. III (Ire Partie). De la Formation des Corps Reproducteurs Appeles Acrospores. G. Masson, Libraire de L’Académie de Médicine, Paris, 51 pp.
  • Dubey R, Pandey AD (2017) Percentage distribution of foliicolous fungi of Maharashtra, India with respect to their disease symptoms: a novel study. Mycologia Iranica 4: 103–120. https://doi.org/10.22043/MI.2018.117293
  • Fernández FA, Huhndorf SM (2005) New species of Chaetosphaeria, Melanopsammella and Tainosphaeria gen. nov. from the Americas. Fungal Diversity 18: 15–57.
  • Fernández FA, Miller AN, Huhndorf SM, Lutzoni FM, Zoller S (2006) Systematics of the genus Chaetosphaeria and its allied genera: morphological and phylogenetic diversity in north temperate and neotropical taxa. Mycologia 98: 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832718
  • Fernández R, Smits G (2018) Registro de hifomicetos acuáticos en el río Guáquira de la Reserva Ecológica Guáquira (San Felipe, Venezuela). Gestión y Ambiente 21: 121–128. https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v21n1.71778
  • Gams W, Holubová-Jechová V (1976) Chloridium and some other dematiaceous hyphomycetes growing on decaying wood. Studies in Mycology 13: 1–99.
  • Goh TK, Lau WP, Teo KC (2014) A new species of Nawawia from Malaysia, with a synopsis of the genus. Mycotaxon 129: 109–118. https://doi.org/10.5248/129.109
  • Grove WB (1886) New or Noteworthy Fungi: Part III. Journal of Botany 24: 197–206.
  • Gutell RR, Gray MW, Schnare MN (1993) A compilation of large subunit (23S and 23Slike) ribosomal RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Research 21: 3055–3074. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/21.13.3055
  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit 5.0.9: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
  • Hashimoto A, Sato G, Matsuda T, Matsumura M, Hatakeyama S, Harada Y, Ikeda H, Tanaka K (2015) Taxonomic revision of Pseudolachnea and Pseudolachnella, and establishment of Neopseudolachnella and Pseudodinemasporium genera nova. Mycologia 107: 383–408. https://doi.org/10.3852/14-171
  • Heredia G, Reyes M, Arias RM, Mena-Portales J, Mercado-Sierra A (2004) Adiciones al conocimiento de la diversidad de los hongos conidiales del bosque mesófilo de montana del estado de Veracruz. Acta Botánica Mexicana 66: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21829/abm66.2004.969
  • Hernández-Restrepo M, Gené J, Castañeda-Ruíz RF, Mena-Portales J, Crous PW, Guarro J (2017) Phylogeny of saprobic microfungi from Southern Europe. Studies in Mycology 86: 53–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2017.05.002
  • Hernández-Restrepo M, Schumacher RK, Wingfield MJ, Ahmad I, Cai L, Duong TA, Edwards J, Gené J, Groenewald JZ, Jabeen S, Khalid AN, Lombard L, Madrid H, Marin-Felix Y, Marincowitz S, Miller AN, Rajeshkumar KC, Rashid A, Sarwar S, Stchigel AM, Taylor PWJ, Zhou N, Crous PW (2016) Fungal systematics and evolution: FUSE 2. Sydowia 68: 193–230. https://doi.org/10.12905/0380.sydowia68-2016-0193
  • Holubová-Jechová V (1973) Lignicolous hyphomycetes from Czechoslovakia 3. Sporoschisma, Sporoschismopsis and Catenularia. Folia Geobotanica and Phytotaxonomica 8: 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854564
  • Holubová-Jechová V (1982) New or interesting phialidic hyphomycetes from Cuba. Mycotaxon 15: 277–292.
  • Holubová-Jechová V, Hennebert GL (1972) Sporoschismopsis, a new genus of lignicolous hyphomycetes. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique National de Belgique 42: 385–391. https://doi.org/10.2307/3667664
  • Hughes SJ (1949) Studies on micro-fungi. II. The genus Sporoschisma Berkeley & Broome and a redescription of Helminthosporium rousselianum Montagne. Mycological Papers 31: 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(49)80034-9
  • Hughes SJ (1958) Revisiones hyphomycetum aliquot cum appendice de nominibus rejiciendis. Canadian Journal of Botany 36: 727–836. https://doi.org/10.1139/b58-067
  • Kodsueb R, McKenzie EHC, Lumyong S, Hyde KD (2008) Fungal succession on woody litter of Magnolia liliifera (Magnoliaceae). Fungal Diversity 30: 55–72. https://doi.org/10.3852/14-328
  • Kuthubutheen AJ, Nawawi A (1994) Henicospora longissima sp. nov., Obeliospora triappendiculata sp. nov., Paraulocladium fabisporum sp. nov. and other hyphomycetes from Malaysia. Mycological Research 98: 677–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80416-4
  • Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B (2017) PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34: 772–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260
  • Li HH, Zhang K, Xia JW, Wang JY, Yang CL, Zhang XG (2017) Catenularia variegata sp. nov. from southern China, and a first Chinese record of Xylocladium clautriavii. Mycotaxon 132: 621–634. https://doi.org/10.5248/132.621
  • Lin CG, McKenzie EHC, Liu JK, Jones EBG, Hyde KD (2019) Hyaline-spored chaetosphaeriaceous hyphomycetes from Thailand and China, with a review of the family Chaetosphaeriaceae. Mycosphere 10: 655–700. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/14
  • Litvinov MA (1967) Opredelitel’ Mikroskopicheskikh Pochvennykh Gribov. Nauka, Leningrad, 475 pp.
  • Liu JK, Yang J, Maharachchikumbura SSN, McKenzie EHC, Jones EBG, Hyde KD, Liu ZY (2016) Novel chaetosphaeriaceous hyphomycetes from aquatic habitats. Mycological Progress 15: 1157–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-016-1237-1
  • Lu YZ, Liu KJ, Hyde KD, Bhat DJ, Xiao YP, Tian Q, Wen TC, Boonmee S, Kang JC (2016) Brunneodinemasporium jonesii and Tainosphaeria jonesii spp. nov. (Chaetosphaeriaceae, Chaetosphaeriales) from southern China. Mycosphere 7: 1322–1331. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/7/9/6
  • Luo ZL, Hyde KD, Liu J-K, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Rajesh J, Bao D-F, Bhat DJ, Lin C-G, Li W-L, Yang J, Liu N-G, Lu Y-Z, Jayawardena RS, Li J-F, Su H-Y (2019) Freshwater Sordariomycetes. Fungal Diversity 99: 451–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00438-1
  • Magyar D, Shoemaker RA, Bobvos J, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ (2011) Pyrigemmula, a novel hyphomycete genus on grapevine and tree bark from Hungary. Mycological Progress 10: 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-010-0703-4
  • Mangenot F (1952) Recherches méthodiques sur les champignons de certains bois en décomposition. Revue Génerale de Botanique 59: 1–115.
  • Mason EW (1941) Annotated account of fungi received at the Imperial Bureau of Mycology. Mycological Papers 5: 1–144.
  • Mbenoun M, De Beer ZW, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD, Roux J (2014) Reconsidering species boundaries in the Ceratocystis paradoxa complex, including a new species from oil palm and cacao in Cameroon. Mycologia 106: 757–784. https://doi.org/10.3852/13-298
  • McKenzie EHC (1991) Dematiaceous hyphomycetes on Freycinetia (Pandanaceae). 3: Chalarodes gen. nov. Mycotaxon 42: 89–93.
  • McNeill J, Barrie FF, Buck WR, Demoulin V, Greuter W (2012) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code). [Regnum vegetabile no. 154.]. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein, 208 pp.
  • Mel’nik VA, Hyde KD (2006) Nawawia sasae-kurilenses sp. nov. from the Russian Far East. Mikologiya i Fitopatologiya 40: 411–414.
  • Mercado Sierra A, Mena Portales J (1985) Nuevo género de hifomicete fialídico de Cuba. Revista del Jardín Botánico Nacional Universidad de la Habana 6: 57–60.
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, 8 pp. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Nawawi A, Kuthubutheen AJ (1990) Obeliospora, a new genus of setose, phialosporous hyphomycetes with appendaged conidia. Mycotaxon 37: 395–400.
  • Réblová M (1999) Studies in Chaetosphaeria sensu lato III. Umbrinosphaeria gen. nov. and Miyoshiella with Sporidesmium anamorphs. Mycotaxon 71: 13–43.
  • Réblová M, Gams W, Seifert KA (2011) Monilochaetes and allied genera of the Glomerellales, and a reconsideration of families in the Microascales. Studies in Mycology 68: 163–191. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2011.68.07
  • Réblová M, Nekvindová J, Fournier J, Miller AN (2020) Delimitation, new species and teleomorph-anamorph relationships in Codinaea, Dendrophoma, Paragaeumannomyces and Striatosphaeria (Chaetosphaeriaceae). MycoKeys 74: 17–74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.74.57824
  • Réblová M, Nekvindová J, Kolařík M, Hernández-Restrepo M (2021a) Delimitation and phylogeny of Dictyochaeta, and introduction of Achrochaeta and Tubulicolla, genera nova. Mycologia 113: 390–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2020.1822095
  • Réblová M, Seifert KA (2003) Six new species of Chaetosphaeria from tropical rain forests in Thailand and redescription of Chaetosphaeria hiugensis. Sydowia 55: 313–347.
  • Réblová M, Winka K (2001) Generic concepts and correlations in ascomycetes based on molecular and morphological data: Lecythothecium duriligni gen. et sp. nov. with a Sporidesmium anamorph, and Ascolacicola austriaca sp. nov. Mycologia 93: 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2001.12063181
  • Rong IH, Gams W (2000) The hyphomycete genera Exochalara and Monilochaetes. Mycotaxon 76: 451–462.
  • Richon C (1877) Description et Dessins de Quelques Plantes Cryptogames Nouvelles ou Extremement Rares. Bulletin de la Société des sciences et arts Vitry-le-François 8: 211–222.
  • Saccardo PA (1883) Sylloge Pyrenomycetum. Sylloge Fungorum 2: 1–813.
  • Saccardo PA (1886) Sylloge Hyphomycetum. Sylloge Fungorum 4: 1–807.
  • Schoknecht JD, Crane JL (1977) Revision of Torula and Hormiscium species. Torula occulta, T. diversa, T. eliastticae, T. bigemina and Hormiscium condensatum reexamined. Mycologia 69: 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1977.12020092
  • Sharma ND (1980) Some additions to fungi of India – VIII. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society 59: 72–77.
  • Shenoy BD, Jeewon R, Wang H, Amandeep K, Ho HW, Bhat DJ, Crous PW, Hyde KD (2010) Sequence data reveals phylogenetic affinities of fungal anamorphs Bahusutrabeeja, Diplococcium, Natarajania, Paliphora, Polyschema, Rattania and Spadicoides. Fungal Diversity 44: 161–169. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158511X617435
  • Shim JJ (1969) Lignicolous fungi on Ulmus americana L. Korean Journal of Microbiology 7: 91–106.
  • Somrithipol S, Sakayaroj J, Rungjindamai N, Plaingam N, Jones EBG (2008) Phylogenetic relationship of the coelomycete genus Infundibulomyces based on nuclear rDNA data. Mycologia 100: 735–741. https://doi.org/10.3852/07-040
  • Spegazzini C (1898) Fungi Argentini novi vel critici. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural Buenos Aires 6: 81–365.
  • Subramanian CV (1992) A reassessment of Sporidesmium (Hyphomycetes) and some related taxa. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences (Plant Sciences) 58: 179–190.
  • Subramanian CV, Bhat DJ (1977) Bahusutrabeeja, a new genus of the hyphomycetes. Canadian Journal of Botany 55: 2202–2206. https://doi.org/10.1139/b77-249
  • Subramanian CV, Bhat DJ (1989) [1987] Hyphomycetes from South India I. Some new taxa. Kavaka 15: 41–74.
  • Sureshkumar G, Sharath Babu K, Kunwar IK, Manoharachary C (2005) Two new hyphomycetous fungal species from India. Mycotaxon 92: 279–283.
  • Sydow H, Sydow P (1914) Enumeration of Philippine fungi with notes and descriptions of new species. II. Philippine Journal of Science Section C Botany 8: 475–508.
  • Szilvinyi A von (1941) Mikrobiologische Boden untersuchungen im Lunzer Gebiet. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie und Parasitenkunde, Abteilung 2. 103: 133–189.
  • Taylor TN, Krings M, Taylor E (2015) Fossil fungi. Academic Press, London, 398 pp.
  • Tulasne ELR, Tulasne C (1863) Selecta Fungorum Carpologia, Tomus Secundus. Xylariei – Valsei – Sphaeriei. Paris, Imperial, Typograph, I–XIX, 319 pp.
  • Vu D, Groenewald M, de Vries M, Gehrmann T, Stielow B, Eberhardt U, Al-Hatmi A, Groenewald JZ, Cardinali G, Houbraken J, Boekhout T, Crous PW, Robert V, Verkley GJM (2019) Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Studies in Mycology 92: 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2018.05.001
  • Wu WP, McKenzie EHC (2003) Obeliospora minima sp. nov. and four other hyphomycetes with conidia bearing appendages. Fungal Diversity 12: 223–234.
  • Xia JW, Ma LG, Ma YR, Castañeda-Ruíz RF, Zhang XG (2013) Corynesporopsis curvularioides sp. nov. and new records of microfungi from southern China. Cryptogamie Mycologie 34: 281–288. https://doi.org/10.7872/crym.v34.iss3.2013.281
  • Yang J, Liu NG, Liu JK, Hyde KD, Jones EBG, Liu ZY (2018) Phylogenetic placement of Cryptophiale, Cryptophialoidea, Nawawia, Neonawawia gen. nov. and Phialosporostilbe. Mycosphere 9: 1132–1150. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/9/6/5

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Table S1. Taxa, isolate information and accession numbers for sequences retrieved from GenBank

Martina Réblová1, Jana Nekvindová2, Andrew N. Miller

Data type: molecular data

Explanation note: New sequences determined for this study and taxonomic novelties are given bold

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (28.68 kb)
login to comment