Research Article |
Corresponding author: Cheng-Ming Tian ( chengmt@bjfu.edu.cn ) Academic editor: Andrew Miller
© 2020 Qin Yang, Ning Jiang, Cheng-Ming Tian.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Yang Q, Jiang N, Tian C-M (2020) Tree inhabiting gnomoniaceous species from China, with Cryphogonomonia gen. nov. proposed. MycoKeys 69: 71-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.69.54012
|
Species of Gnomoniaceae are commonly associated with leaf spot diseases of a wide range of plant hosts worldwide. During our investigation of fungi associated with tree diseases in China, several gnomoniaceous isolates were recovered from symptomatic branches and leaves on different woody plants in the Fagaceae, Pinaceae, and Salicaceae families. These isolates were studied by applying a polyphasic approach including morphological, cultural data, and phylogenetic analyses of partial ITS, LSU, tef1, rpb2 and tub2 gene sequences. As a result, three species were identified with characters fitting into the family Gnomoniaceae. One of these species is described herein as Cryphognomonia pini gen. et sp. nov., characterized by developed pseudostromata and ascospores with obvious hyaline sheath; Gnomoniopsis xunwuensis sp. nov. is illustrated showing sympodially branched conidiophore, oval or fusiform conidia; and one known species, Plagiostoma populinum. The current study improves the understanding of gnomoniaceous species causing diebacks and leaf spot on ecological and economic forest trees.
forest trees, Gnomoniaceae, new genus, phylogeny, systematics
The Gnomoniaceae (Diaporthales, Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota) is a family of perithecial ascomycetes that occur as endophytes, pathogens, or saprobes on growing and overwintered leaves of hardwood trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants (
The sexual morph of Gnomoniaceae is characterized by ascomata that are generally immersed, solitary or aggregated in an undeveloped stroma (
The generic concepts of Gnomoniaceae were recently revised based on a survey of leaf-inhabiting diaporthalean fungi (
Several fungal species of Gnomoniaceae, Cryptosporella platyphylla from Betula platyphylla, Flavignomonia rhoigena from Rhus chinensis, Gnomoniopsis daii and Ophiognomonia castaneae from Castanea mollissima, have been reported from China (
Fresh specimens of Gnomoniaceae-related fungi were collected from branches and leaves of hosts in Beijing, Jiangxi and Shaanxi provinces (Tables
Morphological observations of the asexual/sexual morph in the natural environment were based on features of the conidiomata or ascomata on infected plant tissues and micromorphology, supplemented by cultural characteristics. Ascomata and conidiomata from tree barks were sectioned by hand, using a double-edged blade and structures were observed under a dissecting microscope. The gross morphology of conidiomata or ascomata was recorded using a Leica stereomicroscope (M205 FA). Fungal structures were mounted in clear lactic acid and micromorphological characteristics were examined using a Leica compound microscope (DM 2500) with differential interference contrast (DIC) optics. Thirty measurements of each structure were determined for each collection. Colony characters and pigment production on PDA were noted after 10 d. Colony colors were described according to
Total genomic DNA was extracted from fresh mycelium grown on PDA using a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (
The quality of our amplified nucleotide sequences was checked and combined by SeqMan v.7.1.0 and reference sequences were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), based on
The phylogenetical analyses were conducted using Maximum Parsimony (MP), Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI). MP was performed with PAUP v. 4.0b10 (
The first sequences dataset for the ITS, LSU, tef1, and rpb2 was analyzed to focus on Gnomoniaceae. The alignment included 45 taxa, including the outgroup sequences of Melanconis marginalis (Table
Maximum parsimony phylogram of Gnomoniaceae based on a combined matrix of ITS, LSU, tef1 and rpb2 genes. The MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.90 from BI. Scale bar: 80 nucleotide substitutions. Strains in this study are in blue and ex-type strains are in blod.
Strains and GenBank accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses of Gnomoniaceae
Species | Strains | Genbank accession number | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | LSU | tef1 | rpb2 | ||
Alnecium auctum | CBS 124263 | KF570154 | KF570154 | KF570200 | KF570170 |
Ambarignomonia petiolorum | CBS 116866 | EU199193 | AY818963 | NA | EU199151 |
CBS 121227 | EU254748 | EU255070 | EU221898 | EU219307 | |
Amphiporthe tiliae | CBS 119289 | EU199178 | EU199122 | NA | EU199137 |
Anisogramma anomala | 529478 | EU683064 | EU683066 | NA | NA |
Anisogramma virgultorum | 529479 | EU683062 | EU683065 | NA | NA |
Apiognomonia errabunda | AR 2813 | DQ313525 | NG027592 | DQ313565 | DQ862014 |
Apiognomonia veneta | MFLUCC 16-1193 | MF190114 | MF190056 | NA | NA |
Apioplagiostoma populi | 858501 | KP637024 | NA | NA | NA |
Asteroma alneum | CBS 109840 | EU167609 | EU167609 | NA | NA |
Asteroma sp. | Masuya 8Ah9-1 | NA | AB669035 | NA | NA |
Cryphognomonia pini | CFCC 53020 | MK432672 | MK429915 | MK578144 | MK578100 |
CFCC 53021 | MK432673 | MK429916 | MK578145 | MK578101 | |
Cryptosporella hypodermia | CBS 116866 | EU199181 | AF408346 | NA | EU199140 |
Discula destructiva | MD 254 | AF429741 | AF429721 | AF429732 | NA |
Ditopella biseptata | MFLU 15-2661 | MF190147 | MF190091 | NA | MF377616 |
Ditopella ditopa | CBS 109748 | DQ323526 | EU199126 | NA | EU199145 |
Ditopellopsis sp. | CBS 121471 | EU254763 | EU255088 | EU221936 | EU219254 |
Flavignomonia rhoigena | CFCC 53118 | MK432674 | MK429917 | NA | MK578102 |
CFCC 53119 | MK432675 | MK429918 | NA | MK578103 | |
CFCC 53120 | MK432676 | MK429919 | NA | MK578104 | |
Gnomonia gnomon | CBS 199.53 | DQ491518 | AF408361 | EU221885 | EU219295 |
CBS 829.79 | AY818957 | AY818964 | EU221905 | NA | |
Gnomoniopsis alderdunensis | CBS 125680 | GU320825 | NA | NA | NA |
Gnomoniopsis chamaemori | CBS 803.79 | EU254808 | EU255107 | NA | NA |
Gnomoniopsis racemula | AR 3892 | EU254841 | EU255122 | EU221889 | EU219241 |
Mamianiella coryli | BPI 877578 | EU254862 | NA | NA | NA |
Marsupiomyces quercina | MFLUCC 13-0664 | MF190116 | MF190061 | NA | NA |
Marsupiomyces epidermoidea | MFLU 15-2921 | NA | MF190058 | NA | NA |
Melanconis marginalis | CBS 109744 | EU199197 | AF408373 | EU221991 | EU219301 |
Neognomoniopsis quercina | CBS 145575 | MK876399 | MK876440 | NA | NA |
Occultocarpon ailaoshanense | LCM 524.01 | JF779849 | JF779853 | NA | JF779856 |
LCM 522.01 | JF779848 | JF779852 | JF779862 | JF779857 | |
Ophiognomonia melanostyla | LCM 389.01 | JF779850 | JF779854 | NA | JF779858 |
Ophiognomonia vasiljevae | AR 4298 | EU254977 | EU255162 | EU221999 | EU219331 |
Plagiostoma aesculi | AR 3640 | EU254994 | EU255164 | NA | EU219269 |
Linospora capreae | CBS 372.69 | NA | AF277143 | NA | NA |
Pleuroceras oregonense | AR 4333 | EU255060 | EU255196 | EU221931 | EU219313 |
Pleuroceras pleurostylum | CBS 906.79 | EU255061 | EU255197 | EU221962 | EU219311 |
Phragmoporthe conformis | AR 3632 | NA | AF408377 | NA | NA |
Valsalnicola oxystoma | AR 5137 | JX519561 | NA | NA | NA |
AR 4833 | JX519559 | JX519563 | NA | NA | |
Sirococcus tsugae | AR 4010 | EF512478 | EU255207 | EU221928 | EU219289 |
CBS 119626 | EU199203 | EU199136 | EF512534 | EU199159 | |
Tenuignomonia styracis | BPI 89278 | NA | LC379288 | LC379282 | LC379294 |
The second dataset with ITS, tef1 and tub2 sequences were analyzed in combination to infer the interspecific relationships within Gnomoniopsis. The alignment included 36 taxa, including the outgroup sequences of Apiognomonia veneta and Plagiostoma euphorbiae (Table
Maximum parsimony phylogram of Gnomoniosis based on a combined matrix of ITS, tef1-α and tub2 genes. The MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.90 from BI. Scale bar: 80 nucleotide substitutions. Strains in this study are in blue and ex-type strains are in blod.
Strains and GenBank accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses of Gnomoniopsis
Species | Strain | Genbank accession number | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | tef1 | tub2 | ||
Apiognomonia veneta | CBS 342.86 | DQ313531 | DQ318036 | EU219235 |
Gnomoniopsis alderdunensis | CBS 125679 | GU320826 | GU320813 | GU320788 |
CBS 125680 | GU320825 | GU320801 | GU320787 | |
CBS 125681 | GU320827 | GU320802 | GU320789 | |
Gnomoniopsis chamaemori | CBS 804.79 | GU320817 | GU320809 | GU320777 |
Gnomoniopsis chinensis | CFCC 52286 | MG866032 | MH545370 | MH545366 |
CFCC 52287 | MG866033 | MH545371 | MH545367 | |
CFCC 52288 | MG866034 | MH545372 | MH545368 | |
CFCC 52289 | MG866035 | MH545373 | MH545369 | |
Gnomoniopsis clavulata | CBS 121255 | EU254818 | GU320807 | EU219211 |
Gnomoniopsis comari | CBS 806.79 | EU254821 | GU320810 | EU219156 |
CBS 807.79 | EU254822 | GU320814 | GU320779 | |
CBS 809.79 | EU254823 | GU320794 | GU320778 | |
Gnomoniopsis daii | CFCC 54043 | MN598671 | MN605519 | MN605517 |
CMF002B | MN598672 | MN605520 | MN605518 | |
Gnomoniopsis fructicola | CBS 121226 | EU254824 | GU320792 | EU219144 |
CBS 208.34 | EU254826 | GU320808 | EU219149 | |
CBS 125671 | GU320816 | GU320793 | GU320776 | |
Gnomoniopsis guttulata | MS 0312 | EU254812 | NA | NA |
Gnomoniopsis idaeicola | CBS 125672 | GU320823 | GU320797 | GU320781 |
CBS 125673 | GU320824 | GU320798 | GU320782 | |
CBS 125674 | GU320820 | GU320796 | GU320780 | |
CBS 125675 | GU320822 | GU320799 | GU320783 | |
CBS 125676 | GU320821 | GU320811 | GU320784 | |
Gnomoniopsis macounii | CBS 121468 | EU254762 | GU320804 | EU219126 |
Gnomoniopsis occulta | CBS 125677 | GU320828 | GU320812 | GU320785 |
CBS 125678 | GU320829 | GU320800 | GU320786 | |
Gnomoniopsis paraclavulata | CBS 123202 | GU320830 | GU320815 | GU320775 |
Gnomoniopsis racemula | CBS 121469 | EU254841 | GU320803 | EU219125 |
Gnomoniopsis sanguisorbae | CBS 858.79 | GU320818 | GU320805 | GU320790 |
Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi | CBS 130190 | JQ910642 | KR072534 | JQ910639 |
CBS 130189 | JQ910644 | KR072535 | JQ910641 | |
CBS 130188 | JQ910643 | KR072536 | JQ910640 | |
MUT 401 | HM142946 | KR072537 | KR072532 | |
MUT 411 | HM142948 | KR072538 | KR072533 | |
Gnomoniopsis tormentillae | CBS 904.79 | EU254856 | GU320795 | EU219165 |
Gnomoniopsis xunwuensis | CFCC 53115 | MK432667 | MK578067 | MK578141 |
CFCC 53116 | MK432668 | MK578068 | MK578142 | |
CFCC 53117 | MK432669 | MK578069 | MK578143 | |
Plagiostoma euphorbiae | CBS 340.78 | DQ323532 | GU354016 | GU367034 |
The third dataset with ITS, tef1 and tub2 sequences were analyzed in combination to infer the interspecific relationships within Plagiostoma. The alignment included 48 taxa, including the outgroup sequences of Apiognomonia errabunda (Table
Maximum parsimony phylogram of Plagiostoma based on a combined matrix of ITS, tef1-α and tub2 genes. The MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.90 from BI. Scale bar: 30 nucleotide substitutions. Strains in this study are in blue.
Strains and GenBank accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses of Gnomoniopsis.
Species | Strain | Genbank accession number | ||
ITS | tef1 | tub2 | ||
Apiognomonia errabunda | AR 4182 | DQ313543 | KJ509937 | KJ509947 |
Plagiostoma aceris-palmati | CBS 137265 | KJ509959 | KJ509938 | KJ509949 |
Plagiostoma aesculi | CBS 121905 | EU254994 | GU367022 | GU354005 |
Plagiostoma amygdalinae | CBS 791.79 | EU254995 | GU367030 | GU354012 |
Plagiostoma apiculatum | CBS 109775 | DQ323529 | GU367008 | GU353990 |
CBS 126126 | GU367066 | GU367009 | GU353991 | |
Plagiostoma barriae | LCM 601.01 | GU367054 | GU366997 | GU353980 |
LCM 484.01 | GU367053 | GU366995 | GU353979 | |
Plagiostoma convexum | CBS 123206 | EU255047 | EU219112 | GU353994 |
Plagiostoma devexum | CBS 123201 | EU255001 | GU367027 | GU354010 |
Plagiostoma dilatatum | LCM 403.02 | GU367069 | GU367012 | GU353995 |
CBS 124976 | GU367070 | GU367014 | GU353996 | |
Plagiostoma euphorbiaceum | CBS 816.79 | EU255003 | EU219158 | GU354013 |
Plagiostoma euphorbiae | CBS 340.78 | DQ323532 | GU367034 | GU354016 |
CBS 817.79 | KJ509960 | GU367028 | KJ509950 | |
Plagiostoma exstocollum | CBS 127662 | GU367046 | GU366988 | GU353972 |
LCM 422.01 | GU367043 | GU366989 | GU353969 | |
Plagiostoma fraxini | CBS 121258 | EU255008 | KJ509939 | KJ509951 |
CBS 109498 | AY455810 | GU367033 | GU354015 | |
Plagiostoma geranii | CBS 824.79 | EU255009 | GU367032 | GU354014 |
Plagiostoma imperceptibile | LCM 456.01 | GU367059 | GU367002 | GU353984 |
Plagiostoma jonesii | MFLUCC 16–1189 | MF190159 | NA | MF377589 |
Plagiostoma mejianum | CBS 137266 | KJ509961 | KJ509940 | KJ509952 |
Plagiostoma oregonense | CBS 126124 | GU367073 | GU367016 | GU353999 |
Plagiostoma ovalisporum | CBS 124977 | GU367072 | GU367015 | GU353998 |
Plagiostoma petiolophilum | AR 3821 | EU255039 | GU367025 | GU354008 |
CBS 126123 | GU367078 | GU367023 | GU354006 | |
Plagiostoma populinum | CFCC 53016 | MK432677 | MK578070 | MK578146 |
CFCC 53017 | MK432678 | MK578071 | MK578147 | |
Plagiostoma populinum | CBS 174.58 | GU367074 | GU367017 | GU354000 |
CBS 144.57 | GU367075 | GU367018 | GU354001 | |
Plagiostoma pulchellum | CBS 170.69 | EU255043 | KJ509941 | GU353989 |
CBS 126653 | GU367063 | GU367006 | GU353987 | |
Plagiostoma rhododendri | CBS 847.79 | EU255044 | GU367026 | GU354009 |
Plagiostoma robergeanum | CBS 121472 | EU255046 | GU367029 | GU354011 |
Plagiostoma rubrosporum | CBS 137267 | KJ509962 | KJ509942 | KJ509953 |
Plagiostoma salicellum | CBS 126121 | GU367037 | GU366977 | GU353961 |
CBS 121466 | EU254996 | GU366978 | GU353962 | |
Plagiostoma salicicola | MFLUCC 13–0656 | MF190161 | NA | NA |
Plagiostoma samuelsii | CBS 125668 | GU367051 | GU366993 | GU353977 |
LCM 596.01 | GU367052 | GU366994 | GU353978 | |
Plagiostoma triseptatum | CBS 137268 | KJ509963 | KJ509943 | KJ509954 |
Plagiostoma tsukubense | CBS 137269 | KJ509964 | KJ509944 | KJ509955 |
CBS 137270 | KJ509965 | KJ509945 | KJ509956 | |
Plagiostoma versatile | CBS 124978 | GU367038 | GU366979 | GU393963 |
LCM 598.01 | GU367040 | GU366981 | GU393965 | |
Plagiostoma yunnanense | LCM 513.02 | GU367036 | GU366976 | GU353960 |
CBS 124979 | GU367035 | GU366975 | GU353959 |
Crypho + gnomonia, referring to the cryptic stromata on hosts.
Cryphognomonia pini C.M. Tian & N. Jiang
Pseudostromata erumpent, causing a pustulate bark surface. Central column yellowish to brownish. Stromatic zones lacking. Perithecia conspicuous, flask-shaped to spherical, umber to fuscous black, regularly scattered. Paraphyses deliquescent. Asci fusoid, 8-spored, biseriate, with an apical ring. Ascospores hyaline, clavate to cylindrical, smooth, multi-guttulate, symmetrical to asymmetrical, straight to slightly curved, bicellular, with a median septum distinctly constricted, with distinct hyaline sheath. Asexual morph: not observed.
Cryphognomonia was classified as a new genus in Gnomoniaceae throughout molecular data and the characteristics of sexual morph. Morphologically, Cryphognomonia can be distinguished from the other genera by pseudostromata and ascospores with obvious hyaline sheath.
Cryphognomonia pini differs from its closest phylogenetic neighbor, F. rhoigena, in ITS, LSU, tef1 and rpb2 loci based on the alignments deposited in TreeBASE.
Named after the genus of the host plant from which the holotype was collected, Pinus.
Pseudostromata erumpent, causing a pustulate bark surface, 650–1200 µm diam., containing up to 12 perithecia. Central column yellowish to brownish. Stromatic zones lacking. Perithecia conspicuous, flask-shaped to spherical, umber to fuscous black, regularly scattered, 350–600 µm diam. Paraphyses deliquescent. Asci fusoid, 8-spored, biseriate, with an apical ring, (60–)65–80(–90) × (21–)22–31(–35) µm. Ascospores hyaline, clavate to cylindrical, smooth, multi-guttulate, symmetrical to asymmetrical, straight to slightly curved, bicellular, with a median septum distinctly constricted, with distinct hyaline sheath, (15.5–)18–25(–27) × (8.5–)9.5–11.5(–12) µm. Asexual morph: not observed.
Cultures incubated on PDA at 25 °C in the dark, initially pale white, becoming olive-green after 3 wk. The colonies are flat, with regular margins; texture initially uniform, becoming compact after 1 month.
China. Shaanxi Province: Ankang City, Huoditang forest farm, 33°26'7"N, 108°26'48"E, on branches of Pinus armandii, 8 June 2018, N. Jiang & C.M. Tian (holotype
Cryphognomonia pini is the type species of Cryphognomonia, and occurs on Pinus armandii in China. Morphologically, Cryphognomonia pini is characterized based on bicellular ascospores with obvious hyaline sheath. In the phylogenetic tree, this species is most closely related to F. rhoigena (Fig.
Gnomoniopsis xunwuensis differs from its closest phylogenetic neighbor, G. daii, in ITS, tef1 and tub2 loci based on the alignments deposited in TreeBASE.
Named after the County (Xunwu), where the species was first collected.
On PDA: Conidiomata pycnidial, (115–)130–210(–250) μm diam., globose, solitary to gregarious, or occasionally coalescing, deeply embedded in the medium, erumpent, brown to dark black. White to cream conidial drops exuding from the ostioles. Conidiophores (40–)43–58(–60.5) × 2–2.5(–3) μm, cylindrical, hyaline, phiailidic, branched or sympodially branched, straight or slightly curved. Conidia oval or fusiform, straight to slightly curved, hyaline, multiguttules, (14–)16.5–20 × 4–5.5 µm.
Cultures incubated on PDA at 25 °C in the dark. Colony originally compact and flat with white aerial mycelium, then developing pale brown aerial mycelium at the center and blackish green mycelium at the marginal area, zonate with 2 well defined zones with regular edge; conidiomata dense, regularly distributed over agar surface.
China. Jiangxi Province: Ganzhou City, Xunwu County, 24°40'50"N, 115°34'37"E, on leaves of Castanopsis fissa, 12 May 2018, Q. Yang, Y. Liu & Y.M. Liang (holotype
Gnomoniopsis xunwuensis is associated with leaf spot of Castanopsis fissa, representing the first report from this host in China. It is characterized by sympodially branched conidiophore and oval or fusiform conidia. Morphologically, G. xunwuensis differs from G. daii in having bigger conidia (16.5–20 × 4–5.5 vs. 5.5–7 × 2–3.5 µm) (
See
Plagiostoma populinum on Populus tomentosa (
China. Beijing: Haidian district, 40°31'55"N, 116°20'24"E, on branches of Populus tomentosa, 12 November 2017, N. Jiang (
Plagiostoma populinum is a common plant pathogenic fungus causing poplar canker in China. The current identification follows previous descriptions and records (
In this study, three gnomoniaceous species were identified based on morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. As a result, Cryphognomonia typified with C. pini is proposed as a new genus in Gnomoniaceae for its distinct phylogenic position and distinctive sexual morphs. Also, Gnomoniopsis xunwuensis strains were successfully isolated from leaf spot of Castanopsis fissa, and were identified as a new species in Gnomoniopsis, which was typified by Gnomoniopsis chamaemori having pycnidia with hyaline, oval, one-celled conidia (
The type species of Cryphognomonia, C. pini, is unique through its developed pseudostromata and ascospores with distinct hyaline sheath. In the molecular phylogeny, C. pini is closely related to species of F. rhoigena. Flavignomonia rhoigena is characterized by the formation of synnemata and no sexual morph is known for this species (
Most species of Gnomoniopsis show host preference or potentially limited host specificity to genera in the Fagaceae, Onagraceae and Rosaceae (
Plagiostoma populinum is regarded as the pathogen responsible for poplar canker.
This study is financed by the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China (Project No.: 19B608), the introduction of talent research start-up fund project of CSUFT (Project No.: 2019YJ025) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No.: 31670647). We are grateful to Chungen Piao, Minwei Guo (China Forestry Culture Collection Center (CFCC), Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing.