Research Article |
Corresponding author: Jian-Chu Xu ( jxu@mail.kib.ac.cn ) Corresponding author: Yun-Ju Li ( 93905507@qq.com ) Academic editor: Huzefa Raja
© 2020 Binu C. Samarakoon, Rungtiwa Phookamsak, Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe, Putarak Chomnunti, Kevin D. Hyde, Eric H. C. Mckenzie, Itthayakorn Promputtha, Jian-Chu Xu, Yun-Ju Li.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Samarakoon BC, Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe DN, Chomnunti P, Hyde KD, Mckenzie EHC, Promputtha I, Xu J-C, Li Y-J (2020) Taxonomy and phylogenetic appraisal of Spegazzinia musae sp. nov. and S. deightonii (Didymosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales) on Musaceae from Thailand. MycoKeys 70: 19-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.70.52043
|
Tropical plants host a range of fungal niches including endophytes, pathogens, epiphytes and saprobes. A study undertaken to discover the saprobic fungal species associated with Musa sp. (banana) from northern Thailand found two hyphomycetous taxa of Spegazzinia (Didymosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales). These were collected during the dry season and their morpho-molecular taxonomic relationships were investigated. Based on phylogenetic analysis of combined SSU, LSU, ITS and TEF1-α sequence data (77% ML, 0.99 BYPP) and contrasting morphological features to the sister taxon, we introduce Spegazzinia musae as a novel species from a decaying leaf of Musa sp. Details on the taxonomy, ecology and geographical distribution of Spegazzinia species are provided. In addition, we report S. deightonii as a new host record from Musa sp. Our data further validate the taxonomic placement of Spegazzinia in Didymosphaeriaceae.
Ascomycota, Dothideomycetes, fungi on banana, Hyphomycetes, Thai mycobiota
Several taxonomic studies have been conducted to assess the saprobic fungal diversity in Musa species (
Spegazzinia was established by
In this present study, we introduce Spegazzinia musae sp. nov. and report the first occurrence of Spegazzinia deightonii from Musa sp. in Thailand. We provide detailed morphological descriptions, illustrations and molecular justification for the introduction of Spegazzinia musae sp. nov. Our molecular analyses further support the phylogenetic placement of Spegazzinia in Didymosphaeriaceae.
Dead plant materials of Musa sp. (banana) were collected from Thailand during the dry season of 2018 to 2019. Specimens were transferred to the laboratory in cardboard boxes. Samples were examined with a Motic SMZ 168 Series microscope. Powdery masses of conidia were mounted in water for microscopic studies and photomicrography. The taxa were examined using a Nikon ECLIPSE 80i compound microscope and photographed with a Canon 550D digital camera fitted to the microscope. Measurements were made with the Tarosoft (R) Image Frame Work program and images used for figures processed with Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended version 10.0 software (Adobe Systems, USA).
Single spore isolation was carried out following the method described in
Fungal isolates were grown on PDA for 4 weeks at 25 °C and total genomic DNA was extracted from 50 to 100 mg of axenic mycelium of the growing cultures according to
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted according to the following protocol. The total volume of the PCR reaction was 25 μL containing 12.5 μL of 2 × Power Taq PCR MasterMix (a premix and ready to use solution, including 0.1 Units/ μL Taq DNA Polymerase, 500 μm dNTP Mixture each (dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP), 20 mM Tris-HCL pH 8.3, 100 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, stabilizer and enhancer), 1 μL of each primer (10 pM), 2 μL genomic DNA template and 8.5 μL double distilled water (ddH2O). The reaction was conducted by running for 40 cycles. The annealing temperature was 56 °C for ITS and LSU, 57.2 °C for TEF1-α and 55 °C for SSU and initially 95 °C for 3 mins, denaturation at 95 °C for 30 seconds, annealing for 1 min, elongation at 72 °C for 30 seconds, and final extension at 72 °C for 10 mins for all gene regions. PCR amplification was confirmed on 1% agarose electrophoresis gels stained with ethidium bromide. The amplified PCR fragments were sent to a commercial sequencing provider (TsingKe Biological Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd, China). The nucleotide sequence data acquired were deposited in GenBank.
Obtained sequences were subjected to BLASTn search in GenBank (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). BLASTn search results and initial morphological studies supported that our isolates belonged to Didymosphaeriaceae. Other sequences used in the analyses were obtained from GenBank based on recently published data (
Taxa used in the phylogenetic analysis of Spegazzinia with the corresponding GenBank accession numbers. Type strains are superscripted with T and newly generated strains are indicated in bold.
Species | Strains * | GenBank accession numbers | References | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSU | SSU | ITS | TEF1-α | |||
Alloconiothyrium aptrootii |
|
JX496234 | – | JX496121 | – |
|
Bimuria novae zelandiae |
|
AY016356 | AY016338 | – | – | Lumbsch and Lindemuth (2001) |
Dendrothyrium variisporum |
|
JX496143 | – | JX496030 | – |
|
Deniquelata barringtoniae |
|
JX254655 | JX254656 | JX254654 | – |
|
Didymocrea sadasivanii |
|
DQ384103 | DQ384066 | – | – |
|
Didymosphaeria rubi ulmifolii |
|
KJ436586 | KJ436588 | – | – |
|
Kalmusia spartii |
|
KP744487 | KP753953 | KP744441 | – |
|
Karstenula rhodostoma |
|
GU301821 | GU296154 | – | – |
|
Laburnicola muriformis |
|
KU743198 | KU743199 | KU743197 | KU743213 |
|
Montagnula cirsii |
|
KX274249 | KX274255 | KX274242 | KX284707 | Hyde et al. (2016) |
Montagnula graminicola |
|
KM658315 | KM658316 | KM658314 | – |
|
Neokalmusia brevispora | KT 2313T | AB524601 | AB524460 | – | AB539113 |
|
Neokalmusia scabrispora | KT 2202 | AB524594 | AB524453 | – | AB539107 |
|
Paracamarosporium hawaiiense |
|
JX496140 | EU295655 | JX496027 | – |
|
Paraconiothyrium cyclothyrioides |
|
JX496232 | AY642524 | JX496119 | – |
|
Paraconiothyrium estuarinum |
|
JX496129 | AY642522 | JX496016 | – |
|
Paramassariosphaeria clematidicola |
|
KU743207 | KU743208 | KU743206 | – |
|
Paraphaeosphaeria michotii |
|
KJ939282 | KJ939285 | KJ939279 | – |
|
Phaeodothis winteri | AFTOL-ID 1590 | DQ678073 | DQ678021 | – | DQ677917 |
|
Pleospora herbarum |
|
GU238160 | GU238232 | – | KC584731 |
|
Pseudocamarosporium cotinae |
|
KP744505 | KP753964 | KP744460 | – |
|
Pseudocamarosporium propinquum |
|
KJ813280 | KJ819949 | KJ747049 | – |
|
Pseudopithomyces chartarum |
|
HG518065 | – | HG518060 | – |
|
Spegazzinia bromeliacearum |
|
MK809513 | – | MK804501 | – |
|
Spegazzinia deightonii | yone 212 | AB807582 | AB797292 | – | AB808558 |
|
Spegazzinia deightonii |
|
MN956772 | MN956770 | MN956768 | MN927133 | This study |
Spegazzinia deightonii | yone 66 | AB807581 | AB797291 | – | AB808557 |
|
Spegazzinia intermedia |
|
MH873861 | – | MH862171 | – |
|
Spegazzinia lobulata |
|
MH869344 | – | MH857812 | – |
|
Spegazzinia musae |
|
MN930514 | MN930513 | MN930512 | MN927132 | This study |
Spegazzinia neosundara |
|
KX954397 | KX986341 | KX965728 | – |
|
Spegazzinia radermacherae |
|
NG_066308 | MK347848 | NR_163331 | MK360088 |
|
Spegazzinia sp. | yone 279 | AB807583 | AB797293 | – | AB808559 |
|
Spegazzinia tessarthra |
|
AB807584 | AB797294 | – | AB808560 |
|
Stemphylium botryosum |
|
KC584345 | KC584603 | KC584238 | KC584729 |
|
Tremateia arundicola |
|
KX274248 | KX274254 | KX274241 | KX284706 |
|
Tremateia guiyangensis | GZAAS01T | KX274247 | KX274253 | KX274240 | KX284705 |
|
Xenocamarosporium acaciae | CPC 24755T | KR476759 | – | KR476724 | – |
|
Maximum likelihood (ML) trees were generated using the RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE (8.2.8) (
Maximum likelihood tree revealed by RAxML from an analysis of SSU, LSU and ITS and TEF1-α sequence data of selected genera of family Didymosphaeriaceae, showing the phylogenetic position of Spegazzinia musae (
A Bayesian inference analysis was conducted with MrBayes v. 3.1.2 (
The data underpinning the analysis reported in this paper are deposited in the Dryad Data Repository at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2ngf1vhk6.
The combined SSU, LSU, ITS, TEF1-α matrix comprised 38 sequences including selected genera in Didymosphaeriaceae. A best scoring RAxML tree is shown in Figure
Saprobic on dead leaves of Musa sp. Sexual morph Undetermined. Asexual morph Hyphomycetous. Sporodochia powder like, dark, dense, dry, 1–3 mm diameter. Conidiophore mother cells 3.5–6.8 × 2.5–5.0 μm (x̄ = 5.59 × 4.15 μm, n = 6), hyaline to light brown, subspherical or doliiform. Conidiophores long or short and give rise to two types of conidia referred here as α and β. Conidiophores of α conidia up to 48–120 × 1–2 μm (x̄ = 95.3 × 1.6 μm, n = 20) long, erect or flexuous, narrow, verruculose, unbranched, hyaline to golden-brown. Conidiophores of β conidia initially hyaline, light brown to brown at maturity, very short and slightly bent, 1.6–2 × 2.5–3 μm (x̄ = 1.8 × 2.6 μm, n =10). Conidiogenous cell development basauxic, forming a single, terminal holoblastic conidium at the apex of conidiophore. Conidial development holoblastic. Conidia two types: α conidia stellate, 18–28 × 17–29 μm (x̄ = 25.1 × 23.3 μm, n = 25), solitary, globose to variously shaped, with spines 4–6 μm long, 4–8-celled, frequently 4- to 6-celled, deeply constricted at the septa. β conidia disc-shaped, initially hyaline, light brown to dark brown at maturity, 8-celled, 16–21 × 11–14 μm (x̄ = 19.2 × 14.6 μm, n = 25), flat from both sides with short and blunt spines, frequently with attached conidiogenous cells when splitting from the conidiophores.
Conidia germinating on PDA within 13–14 h. Colonies growing on PDA, reaching a diameter of 55 mm after 14 d at 25 °C, raised, moderately dense, undulate margin, middle grey, periphery brownish grey and olive green at immature stage; reverse white to greyish white.
Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Doi Thun, on a dead leaf of Musa sp. (Musaceae), 7 December 2018, M.C. Samarakoon, BNS 072 (
Spegazzinia deightonii
Spegazzinia deightonii (
The name reflects the host genus, Musa (Musaceae).
Saprobic on a dead leaf of Musa sp. Sexual morph Undetermined. Asexual morph Hyphomycetous. Sporodochia dark, dense, dry, powdery, velvety, 1–2 mm diameter. Conidiophore mother cells 3.4–5.8 × 3.7–4.7 μm (x̄ = 4.6 × 4.1 μm, n = 10) subhyaline or light brown, doliiform or subspherical. Conidiophores usually short to long bearing two types of conidia referred to here as α and β. Conidiophores of α conidia up to 40–85 × 0.8–2.5 μm (x̄ = 64 × 21.7 μm, n = 15), pale brown or dark golden brown, rough-walled, hyaline at bottom near the conidiophore mother cell, pale brown at middle, dark golden brown at top near conidial cells, erect or flexuous, narrow and long, generally unbranched, rarely branched. Conidiophores of β conidia 0.7–3.5 × 1.5–3 μm (x̄ = 1.9 × 2.3 μm, n = 15) short, erect, unbranched, hyaline when immature, subhyaline or hyaline at maturity. Conidiogenous cell development basauxic, forming a single, terminal holoblastic conidium at the apex of conidiophore. Conidial development holoblastic. Conidia solitary, dry, two types: α conidia stellate, 15–22.7 × 14.5–20.5 μm (x̄ = 18.8 × 17.8 μm, n = 15), 4–6 celled, each cell globose to subglobose, deeply constricted at the septa, conspicuously spinulate, 4–6 spines, each 2–8 μm long arise from surface of each cell. β conidia disc-shaped, initially hyaline, 4-celled, each cell slightly turbinate in shape, rough-walled, crossed septate, becoming brown to dark brown at maturity, each cell turbinate, crossed-septate, smooth-walled, light brown at the center near the septa, dark brown at periphery in constricted areas, 9.3–14.2 × 8.4–12.5 μm (x̄ = 12.7 × 10.8 μm, n = 40), somewhat obovoid, deeply constricted at the septa, flat from side view, frequently with attached conidiogenous cells when splitting from the conidiophores.
Conidia germinating on PDA within 12–15 h, germ tubes produced from one or several cells. Colonies growing on PDA, reaching a diameter of 46 mm after 14 d at 25 °C, greyish white, unevenly raised, surface rough, moderately dense, radially striated at center, margin crenulate; reverse white to greyish white.
Thailand, Nan Province, on a dead leaf of Musa sp. (Musaceae), 12 September 2018, B.C. Samarakoon, BNS 069 (
Based on BLASTn search results of SSU, LSU, ITS and TEF1-α sequence data, Spegazzinia musae showed a high similarity (SSU = 98.24%, LSU = 98.92%, ITS = 96.91%, TEF1-α = 98.11%) to S. neosundara (
Spegazzinia is ubiquitous in the environment. Several taxa of Spegazzinia occur as saprobes on dead material of tropical, subtropical and temperate vascular plants (
There does not appear to be any host-specificity as the genus is found on a wide range of hosts in various habitats and there are no records of a pathogenic lifestyle. Some Spegazzinia species (such as S. tessarthra) have been identified as saprobes and endophytes and therefore the genus may have the potential of switching nutritional modes during the degradation of plant material (
Spegazzinia is a unique taxon among other dematiaceous hyphomycetes due to its conidial morphology and basauxic conidiogenesis. Most Spegazzinia species have contrasting morphological features in the shapes of α and β conidia. Some taxa bear spines in both types of conidia while some taxa do not bear spines. Simultaneously, some species of Spegazzinia such as S. radermacherae, S. tessarthra show similar characters in morphology apart from dimensions of conidia. The length of conidiophores can be varied with the environmental stresses (
Dictyoarthrinium (Apiosporaceae) bears some similar morphological features to Spegazzinia such as basauxic conidiogenesis (
Microfungal studies in Musa sp. are mostly oriented towards pathogens and endophytes due to the economic value of the fruit crop. Most of the pathogenic species descriptively studied from Musa sp. are identified as Colletotrichum, Fusarium, Mycosphaerella, Neocordana and Phyllosticta (
Authors would like to acknowledge Mae Fah Luang University (grant No. DR256201012003) and the grant titled “Impact of climate change on fungal diversity and biogeography in the Greater Mekong Subregion” (grant number: RDG6130001) for financial support. R. Phookamsak thanks CAS President’s International Fellowship Initiative (PIFI) for young staff (grant no. Y9215811Q1), the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) project code 31850410489 (grant no. Y81I982211). R. Phookamsak and I. Promputtha thank Chiang Mai University for their partial support of this research work. D. N. Wanasinghe would like to thank the CAS President’s International Fellowship Initiative (PIFI) for funding his postdoctoral research (number 2019PC0008), the National Science Foundation of China and the Chinese Academy of Sciences for financial support under the following grants: 41761144055, 41771063 and Y4ZK111B01. D.N. Wanasinghe also thanks the 64th batch of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant no.: Y913083271). J.C. Xu thanks the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. QYZDY-SSW-SMC014). S.M.B.C. Samarakoon gives her sincere appreciation to Milan Samarakoon, Junfu Li, De-Ping Wei, Achala Jeevani, G. Samarakoon and Kaanchana Senadheera for the great support.