Research Article |
Corresponding author: Dalia Aiello ( dalia.aiello@live.it ) Academic editor: Nalin Wijayawardene
© 2020 Dalia Aiello, Alessandro Vitale, Giancarlo Polizzi, Hermann Voglmayr.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Aiello D, Vitale A, Polizzi G, Voglmayr H (2020) Ochraceocephala foeniculi gen. et sp. nov., a new pathogen causing crown rot of fennel in Italy. MycoKeys 66: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.66.48389
|
A new disease of fennel is described from Sicily (southern Italy). Surveys of the disease and sampling were conducted during spring 2017 and 2018 in Adrano and Bronte municipalities (Catania province) where this crop is widely cultivated. Isolations from the margin of symptomatic tissues resulted in fungal colonies with the same morphology. Pathogenicity tests with one isolate of the fungus on 6-month-old plants of fennel reproduced similar symptoms to those observed in nature. Inoculation experiments to assess the susceptibility of six different fennel cultivars to infection by the pathogen showed that the cultivars ‘Narciso’, ‘Apollo’, and ‘Pompeo’ were more susceptible than ‘Aurelio’, ‘Archimede’, and ‘Pegaso’. Phylogenetic analyses based on a matrix of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), the large subunit (LSU), and the small subunit (SSU) rDNA regions revealed that the isolates represent a new genus and species within the Leptosphaeriaceae, which is here described as Ochraceocephala foeniculi gen. et sp. nov. This study improves the understanding of this new fennel disease, but further studies are needed for planning effective disease management strategies. According to the results of the phylogenetic analyses, Subplenodomus iridicola is transferred to the genus Alloleptosphaeria and Acicuseptoria rumicis to Paraleptosphaeria.
Fungal disease, Leptosphaeriaceae, pathogenicity, susceptibility
Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.), native in arid and semi-arid regions of southern Europe and the Mediterranean area, is used as a vegetable, herb, and seed spice in the food, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and healthcare industries. Italy is the leading world producer of fennel (around 85% of the world production), with 20,035 ha of area cultivated and a total production of 537,444 tons. Fennel represents an important crop widely cultivated in Sicily (southern Italy) with 1,620 ha harvested and a production of 35,930 tons (
In 2017, a new disease was first observed on fennel in a farm of Adrano area (Catania province, eastern Sicily, Italy). The disease symptoms were necrotic lesions on the crown, root, and stem of fennel plants. Disease incidence initially was about 5% on ‘Apollo’ cultivar. However, in 2018 different surveys conducted in the same area showed a high increase of the incidence on three different cultivars with yield losses of about 20–30%. The aims of the present study were to identify the causal agent obtained from symptomatic fennel plants, using morphological characteristics and DNA sequence analyses, to evaluate the pathogenicity of one representative isolate and to evaluate the susceptibility of different cultivars of fennel to the newly described disease.
Disease | Fungal pathogen | Reference |
Collar rot | Sclerotium rolfsii |
|
Damping off and Root rot | Pythium spp. |
|
Vascular wilt | Fusarium oxysporum |
|
Vascular wilt | Verticillium dahliae |
|
Root and Foot rot | Rhizoctonia solani |
|
Brown rot and Wilt | Phytophthora megasperma |
|
Stem rot | Sclerotinia sclerotiorum |
|
Blight and Leaf spot | Alternaria alternata |
|
Blight and Leaf spot | Ascochyta foeniculina |
|
Blight and Leaf spot | Fusoidiella anethi |
|
syn. Cercospora foeniculi | ||
Cercosporidium punctum | ||
Mycosphaerella anethi | ||
M. foeniculi | ||
Passalora kirchneri | ||
P. puncta | ||
Ramularia foeniculi | ||
Umbel browning and Stem necrosis | Diaporthe angelicae |
|
Downy mildew | Plasmopara mei-foeniculi |
|
syn. P. nivea sensu lato | ||
Powdery mildew | Leveillula languinosa |
|
Powdery mildew | Erysiphe heraclei |
|
Leaf spot | Leptosphaeria purpurea |
|
Leaf spot | Subplenodomus apiicola |
|
syn. Phoma apiicola | ||
Leaf spot and blight | Phoma herbarum |
|
Crown rot | Didymella glomerata |
|
syn. Phoma glomerata |
In order to identify the causal agent of the fennel disease, 30 samples were collected during several surveys in Adrano and Bronte area (Catania province, eastern Sicily). Pieces of tissue obtained from different parts of fennel plants (crown, root, and stem) were surface disinfected for 1 min in 1.5% sodium hypochlorite solution, rinsed in sterile water, placed on potato dextrose agar (3.9% PDA, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) amended with 100 mg/L of streptomycin sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) to prevent bacteria growth, and then incubated at 25 ± 1 °C for seven days. Fungal colonies consistently grown from symptomatic tissues were subcultured on new PDA plates. Subsequently, single-spore isolates were obtained from these pure cultures and stored at –20 °C in sterile 15% glycerol solution. The fungal isolates were provisionally identified by cultural and morphological characteristics, and they were deposited in the culture collection of the Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania. One representative isolate (Di3A-F1; ex holotype culture) was deposited at the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (CBS), Utrecht, the Netherlands. The holotype specimen of the new pathogen species was deposited in the fungarium of the Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna (
For culture characteristics, cultures were grown on 2% (w/v) malt extract agar (MEA, VWR) and on corn meal agar (CMA, Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 2% w/v dextrose (CMD). Colony diameters and morphologies were determined after seven days of incubation at room temperature (22 ± 1 °C) and daylight.
Microscopic observations were made in tap water. Methods of microscopy included stereomicroscopy using a Nikon SMZ 1500 equipped with a Nikon DS-U2 digital camera, and Nomarski differential interference contrast (DIC) using a Zeiss Axio Imager.A1 compound microscope equipped with a Zeiss Axiocam 506 colour digital camera. Images and data were gathered using the NIS-Elements D v. 3.22.15 or Zeiss ZEN Blue Edition software packages. Measurements are reported as maxima and minima in parentheses and the range representing the mean plus and minus the standard deviation of a number of measurements given in parentheses.
The extraction of genomic DNA from pure cultures was performed by using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega Corporation, WI, USA). Partial regions of six loci (ITS, LSU, and SSU rDNA, RPB2, TEF1, TUB2) were amplified; for details on the primers and annealing temperatures used for PCR and sequencing, see Table
Primers used to amplify and sequence the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS), large subunit (LSU) and small subunit (SSU) rDNA regions, the RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2) gene, the translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF1) gene and the β-tubulin (TUB2) gene.
Gene | Primer | Sequence (5'–3') | Direction | Annealing t (°C) | Reference |
ITS | ITS5 | GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG | forward | 48 |
|
ITS4 | TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC | reverse |
|
||
LSU | LR0R | GTACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC | forward | 48 |
|
LR5 | TCCTGAGGGAAACTTCG | reverse |
|
||
ITS-LSU | V9G | TTAAGTCCCTGCCCTTTGTA | forward | 55 |
|
LR5 | TACTTGAAGGAACCCTTACC | reverse |
|
||
LR2R-Az | CAGAGACCGATAGCGCAC | forward |
|
||
LR3z | CCGTGTTTCAAGACGGG | reverse |
|
||
ITS4z | TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC | reverse |
|
||
SSU | NS1 | GTAGTCATATGCTTGTCTC | forward | 48 |
|
NS4 | CTTCCGTCAATTCCTTTAAG | reverse |
|
||
RPB2 | RPB2-5F2 | GGGGWGAYCAGAAGAAGGC | forward | 52 |
|
RPB2-7cR | CCCATRGCTTGYTTRCCCAT | reverse |
|
||
TEF1 | EF1-728F | CATCGAGAAGTTCGAGAAGG | forward | 52 |
|
EF1-986R | TACTTGAAGGAACCCTTACC | reverse |
|
||
EF1-728F | CATCGAGAAGTTCGAGAAGG | forward | 55 |
|
|
TEF1-LLErev | AACTTGCAGGCAATGTGG | reverse |
|
||
TEF1_INTFz | CCGTGAYTTCATCAAGAACATG | forward |
|
||
TEF1_INT2z | CCACTTNGTNGTGTCCATCTTRTT | reverse |
|
||
TUB2 | T1 | AACATGCGTGAGATTGTAAGT | forward | 52 |
|
bt2b | ACCCTCAGTGTAGTGACCCTTGGC | reverse |
|
Characteristics and accession numbers of isolates collected from fennel plants in Sicily.
Strain1 | Year | Cultivar | Farm | ITS2 | LSU2 | SSU2 | RPB2 2 | TEF1 2 | TUB2 2 |
Di3AF1 = CBS 145654* | 2017 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516753 | MN516774 | MN516743 | MN520145 | MN520149 | MN520147 |
Di3AF2 | 2017 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516754 | MN516775 | MN516744 | |||
Di3AF3 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516755 | MN516776 | MN516745 | |||
Di3AF4 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | ||||||
Di3AF5 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516756 | MN516777 | MN516746 | |||
Di3AF6 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516757 | MN516778 | MN516747 | |||
Di3AF7 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516758 | |||||
Di3AF8 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516759 | |||||
Di3AF9 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516760 | MN516779 | MN516748 | |||
Di3AF10 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516761 | MN516780 | MN516749 | MN520146 | MN520150 | MN520148 |
Di3AF11 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516762 | |||||
Di3AF12 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516763 | |||||
Di3AF13 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516764 | MN516781 | MN516750 | |||
Di3AF14 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516765 | MN516782 | MN516751 | |||
Di3AF15 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516766 | MN516783 | MN516752 | |||
Di3AF16 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516767 | |||||
Di3AF17 | 2018 | Apollo | Farm 1 | MN516768 | |||||
Di3AF18 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 2 | ||||||
Di3AF19 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 2 | MN516769 | |||||
Di3AF20 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 2 | MN516770 | |||||
Di3AF21 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 2 | MN516771 | |||||
Di3AF22 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 2 | ||||||
Di3AF23 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 2 | ||||||
Di3AF24 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 2 | ||||||
Di3AF25 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 2 | ||||||
Di3AF26 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 3 | ||||||
Di3AF27 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 3 | ||||||
Di3AF28 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 3 | ||||||
Di3AF29 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 4 | ||||||
Di3AF30 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 4 | MN516772 | |||||
Di3AF31 | 2018 | Narciso | Farm 4 | ||||||
Di3AF32 | 2018 | Aurelio | Farm 5 | MN516773 |
According to the results of BLAST searches in GenBank, the newly generated ITS, LSU, and SSU rDNA sequences of the fennel pathogen were aligned with selected sequences of Leptosphaeriaceae from
Isolates and accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses. Isolate/sequences in bold were isolated/sequenced in the present study.
Taxon | Culture, specimen | Host, substrate | Country | GenBank accession no | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | LSU | SSU | ||||
Alloleptosphaeria iridicola | CBS 143395 | Iris sp. (Iridaceae) | United Kingdom | MH107919 | MH107965 | |
Alloleptosphaeria italica | MFLUCC 14-934 | Clematis vitalba (Ranunculaceae) | Italy | KT454722 | KT454714 | |
Alternariaster bidentis | CBS 134021 | Bidens sulphurea (Asteraceae) | Brazil | KC609333 | KC609341 | |
Alternariaster centaureae-diffusae | MFLUCC 14-0992 | Centaurea diffusa (Asteraceae) | Russia | KT454723 | KT454715 | KT454730 |
Alternariaster helianthi | CBS 119672 | Helianthus sp. (Asteraceae) | USA | KC609337 | KC584368 | KC584626 |
Alternariaster trigonosporus | MFLU 15-2237 | Cirsium sp. (Asteraceae) | Russia | KY674857 | KY674858 | |
Coniothyrium carteri | CBS 105.91 | Quercus robur (Fagaceae) | Germany | JF740181 | GQ387594 | GQ387533 |
Coniothyrium dolichi | CBS 124140 | Dolichos biforus (Fabaceae) | India | JF740183 | GQ387611 | GQ387550 |
Coniothyrium glycines | CBS 124455 | Glycine max (Fabaceae) | Zambia | JF740184 | GQ387597 | GQ387536 |
Coniothyrium multiporum | CBS 501.91 | Unknown | Egypt | JF740186 | GU238109 | |
Coniothyrium palmarum | CBS 400.71 | Chamaerops humilis (Arecaceae) | Italy | AY720708 | EU754153 | EU754054 |
Coniothyrium telephii | CBS 188.71 | Air | Finland | JF740188 | GQ387599 | GQ387538 |
Heterosporicola chenopodii | CBS 448.68 | Chenopodium album (Chenopodiaceae) | Netherlands | FJ427023 | EU754187 | EU754088 |
Heterosporicola dimorphospora | CBS 165.78 | Chenopodium quinoa (Chenopodiaceae) | Peru | JF740204 | JF740281 | JF740098 |
Leptosphaeria conoidea | CBS 616.75 | Lunaria annua (Brassicaceae) | Netherlands | JF740201 | JF740279 | JF740099 |
Leptosphaeria doliolum | CBS 505.75 | Urtica dioica (Urticaceae) | Netherlands | JF740205 | GQ387576 | GQ387515 |
Leptosphaeria errabunda | CBS 617.75 | Solidago sp. (hybrid) (Asteraceae) | Netherlands | JF740216 | JF740289 | |
Leptosphaeria macrocapsa | CBS 640.93 | Mercurialis perennis (Euphorbiaceae) | Netherlands | JF740237 | JF740304 | |
Leptosphaeria pedicularis | CBS 126582 | Gentiana punctata (Gentianaceae) | Switzerland | JF740223 | JF740293 | |
Leptosphaeria sclerotioides | CBS 144.84 | Medicago sativa (Fabaceae) | Canada | JF740192 | JF740269 | |
Leptosphaeria slovacica | CBS 389.80 | Balota nigra (Lamiaceae) | Netherlands | JF740247 | JF740315 | JF740101 |
Leptosphaeria sydowii | CBS 385.80 | Senecio jacobaea (Asteraceae) | UK | JF740244 | JF740313 | |
Leptosphaeria veronicae | CBS 145.84 | Veronica chamaedryoides (Scrophulariaceae) | Netherlands | JF740254 | JF740320 | |
Neoleptosphaeria rubefaciens | CBS 387.80 | Tilia (×) europea (Malvaceae) | Netherlands | JF740242 | JF740311 | |
Ochraceocephala foeniculi | Di3AF1 = CBS 145654 | Foeniculum vulgare (Apiaceae) | Italy | MN516753 | MN516774 | MN516743 |
Paraleptosphaeria dryadis | CBS 643.86 | Dryas octopetala (Rosaceae) | Switzerland | JF740213 | GU301828 | |
Paraleptosphaeria macrospora | CBS 114198 | Rumex domesticus (Chenopodiaceae) | Norway | JF740238 | JF740305 | |
Paraleptosphaeria nitschkei | CBS 306.51 | Cirsium spinosissimum (Asteraceae) | Switzerland | JF740239 | JF740308 | |
Paraleptosphaeria orobanches | CBS 101638 | Epifagus virginiana (Orobanchaceae) | USA | JF400230 | JF740299 | |
Paraleptosphaeria padi | MFLU 15-2756 | Prunus padus (Rosaceae) | Russia | KY554203 | KY554198 | KY554201 |
Paraleptosphaeria praetermissa | CBS 114591 | Rubus idaeus (Rosaceae) | Sweden | JF740241 | JF740310 | |
Paraleptosphaeria rubi | MFLUCC 14-0211 | Rubus sp. (Rosaceae) | Italy | KT454726 | KT454718 | KT454733 |
Paraleptosphaeria rumicis | CBS 522.78 | Rumex alpinus (Polygonaceae) | France | KF251144 | KF251648 | |
Plenodomus agnitus | CBS 121.89 | Eupatorium cannabinum (Asteraceae) | Netherlands | JF740194 | JF740271 | |
Plenodomus agnitus | CBS 126584 | Eupatorium cannabinum (Asteraceae) | Netherlands | JF740195 | JF740272 | |
Plenodomus artemisiae | KUMCC 18-0151 | Artemisia sp. (Asteraceae) | China | MK387920 | MK387958 | MK387928 |
Plenodomus biglobosus | CBS 119951 | Brassica rapa (Brassicaceae) | Netherlands | JF740198 | JF740274 | JF740102 |
Plenodomus biglobosus | CBS 127249 | Brassica juncea (Brassicaceae) | France | JF740199 | JF740275 | |
Plenodomus chrysanthemi | CBS 539.63 | Chrysanthemum sp. (Asteraceae) | Greece | JF740253 | GU238151 | GU238230 |
Plenodomus collinsoniae | CBS 120227 | Vitis coignetiae (Vitaceae) | Japan | JF740200 | JF740276 | |
Plenodomus confertus | CBS 375.64 | Anacyclus radiatus (Asteraceae) | Spain | AF439459 | JF740277 | |
Plenodomus congestus | CBS 244.64 | Erigeron canadensis (Asteraceae) | Spain | AF439460 | JF740278 | |
Plenodomus deqinensis | CGMCC 3.18221 | soil | China | KY064027 | KY064031 | |
Plenodomus enteroleucus | CBS 142.84 | Catalpa bignonioides (Bignoniaceae) | Netherlands | JF740214 | JF740287 | |
Plenodomus enteroleucus | CBS 831.84 | Triticum aestivum (Poaceae) | Germany | JF740215 | JF740288 | |
Plenodomus fallaciosus | CBS 414.62 | Satureia montana (Lamiaceae) | France | JF740222 | JF740292 | |
Plenodomus guttulatus | MFLU 15-1876 | unidentified dead stem | Germany | KT454721 | KT454713 | KT454729 |
Plenodomus hendersoniae | CBS 113702 | Salix cinerea (Salicaceae) | Sweden | JF740225 | JF740295 | |
Plenodomus hendersoniae | CBS 139.78 | Pyrus malus (Rosaceae) | Netherlands | JF740226 | JF740296 | |
Plenodomus hendersoniae | LTO | Salix appendiculata (Salicaceae) | Austria | MF795790 | MF795790 | |
Plenodomus influorescens | CBS 143.84 | Fraxinus excelsior (Oleaceae) | Netherlands | JF740228 | JF740297 | |
Plenodomus influorescens | PD 73/1382 | Lilium sp. (Liliaceae) | Netherlands | JF740229 | JF740298 | |
Plenodomus libanotidis | CBS 113795 | Seseli libanotis (Apiaceae) | Sweden | JF740231 | JF740300 | |
Plenodomus lijiangensis | KUMCC 18-0186 | dead fern fronds | China | MK387921 | MK387959 | MK387929 |
Plenodomus lindquistii | CBS 386.80 | Helianthus annuus (Asteraceae) | former Yugoslavia | JF740232 | JF740301 | |
Plenodomus lindquistii | CBS 381.67 | Helianthus annuus (Asteraceae) | Canada | JF740233 | JF740302 | |
Plenodomus lingam | CBS 275.63 | Brassica sp. (Brassicaceae) | UK | JF740234 | JF740306 | JF740103 |
Plenodomus lingam | CBS 260.94 | Brassica oleracea (Brassicaceae) | Netherlands | JF740235 | JF740307 | |
Plenodomus lupini | CBS 248.92 | Lupinus mutabilis (Fabaceae) | Peru | JF740236 | JF740303 | |
Plenodomus pimpinellae | CBS 101637 | Pimpinella anisum (Apiaceae) | Israel | JF740240 | JF740309 | |
Plenodomus salviae | MFLUCC 13-0219 | Salvia glutinosa (Lamiaceae) | Italy | KT454725 | KT454717 | KT454732 |
Plenodomus sinensis | MFLU 17-0757 | Plukenetia volubilis (Euphorbiaceae) | China | MF072722 | MF072718 | MF072720 |
Plenodomus tracheiphilus | CBS 551.93 | Citrus limonium (Rutaceae) | Israel | JF740249 | JF740317 | JF740104 |
Plenodomus tracheiphilus | CBS 127250 | Citrus sp. (Rutaceae) | Italy | JF740250 | JF740318 | |
Plenodomus visci | CBS 122783 | Viscum album (Viscaceae) | France | JF740256 | EU754195 | EU754096 |
Plenodomus wasabiae | CBS 120119 | Wasabia japonica (Brassicaceae) | Taiwan | JF740257 | JF740323 | |
Plenodomus wasabiae | CBS 120120 | Wasabia japonica (Brassicaceae) | Taiwan | JF740258 | JF740324 | |
Pseudoleptosphaeria etheridgei | CBS 125980 | Populus tremuloides (Salicaceae) | Canada | JF740221 | JF740291 | |
Sphaerellopsis filum | CBS 317.68 | Puccinia deschampsiae uredinium, on Deschampsia caespitosa | Germany | KP170657 | KP170725 | |
Sphaerellopsis hakeae | CPC 29566 | Hakea sp. (Proteaceae) | Australia | KY173466 | KY173555 | |
Sphaerellopsis isthmospora | KUN-HKAS 102225 | Unidentified twig | China | MK387925 | MK387963 | MK387934 |
Sphaerellopsis macroconidialis | CBS 233.51 | Uromyces caryophylli on Dianthus caryophyllus | Italy | KP170658 | KP170726 | |
Sphaerellopsis paraphysata | CPC 21841 | Pennisetum sp. (Poaceae) | Brazil | KP170662 | KP170729 | |
Subplenodomus apiicola | CBS 285.72 | Apium graveolens var. rapaceum (Apiaceae) | Germany | JF740196 | GU238040 | |
Subplenodomus drobnjacensis | CBS 269.92 | Eustoma exaltatum (Gentianaceae) | Netherlands | JF740211 | JF740285 | JF740100 |
Subplenodomus valerianae | CBS 630.68 | Valeriana phu (Valerianaceae) | Netherlands | JF740251 | GU238150 | |
Subplenodomus violicola | CBS 306.68 | Viola tricolor (Violaceae) | Netherlands | FJ427083 | GU238156 | GU238231 |
Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed with RAxML (
Maximum parsimony (MP) bootstrap analyses were performed with PAUP v. 4.0a165 (
To determine the ability of the representative isolate Di3A-F1 (CBS 145654) to cause disease symptoms, pathogenicity tests were conducted on 6-month-old plants of fennel grown in a growth chamber. Five plants for each of the three replicates were used. The inoculum, which consisted of a 6-mm-diameter mycelial plug from a 10-day-old culture on PDA, was inserted in four points for each crown and the wounds wrapped with Parafilm to prevent desiccation. Fennel plants inoculated with sterile PDA plugs served as a control. After inoculation, plants were covered with a plastic bag for 48 h and maintained at 25 ± 1 °C and 95% relative humidity (RH) under a 12 h fluorescent light/dark regime. Five days after inoculation the presence of a lesion was evaluated in each inoculation point. To fulfill Koch’s postulates, symptomatic tissues taken from the crown of each inoculated plant were plated on PDA and the identity of the fungal isolates was confirmed as described above.
To evaluate the susceptibility of six different cultivars of fennel to infection by the pathogen, one experiment was conducted on 1 to 2-month-old seedlings of fennel in a growth chamber. Eight plants for each of three replicates were used. The inoculum, which consisted of a 6-mm-diameter mycelial plug from a 10-day-old culture on PDA, was inserted at the crown of each plant and wrapped with Parafilm to prevent desiccation. Fennel plants inoculated with sterile PDA plugs served as a control. All the replicates were enclosed in plastic bags and maintained at 25 ± 1 °C and 95% relative humidity (RH) under a 12 h fluorescent light/dark regime in a growth chamber until the symptoms were observed. Plant mortality (PM), disease incidence (DI) and symptom severity (SS) were evaluated. Symptom severity was rated using a category scale from 0 to 5, where 0 = healthy plant; 1 = necrotic lesion on crown from 0.1 to 0.2 cm; 2 = from 0.3 to 1 cm; 3 = from 1.1 to 2 cm; 4 = from 2.1 to 3.5 cm; 5 = dead plant. The experiment was performed twice.
Data about disease susceptibility of examined fennel cultivars from the repeated experiments were analysed by using the Statistica package software (v. 10; Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). The arithmetic means of PM, DI, and SS were calculated, averaging the values determined for the single replicates of each treatment. Percentage data concerning PM and DI were transformed into the arcsine (sin–1 square rootx) prior to analysis of variance (ANOVA), whereas SS values were not transformed. Initial analyses of PM and DI were performed by calculating F and P values associated to evaluate whether the effects of single factor (cultivar) and cultivar × trial interactions are significant. In the post hoc analyses, the corresponding mean values of PM and DI were subsequently separated by the Fisher’s least significant difference test (P = 0.05). Because ordinal scales were adopted for SS data calculation, different nonparametric approaches were used. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W) was calculated to assess whether the rankings of the SS scores among fennel cultivars are similar within each trial (cultivar × trial interactions). Since in the susceptibility experiment W was higher than 0.9, the SS scores were at first analysed by using Friedman’s nonparametric rank test, and subsequently followed by the all possible pairwise performed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank at P < 0.05. On the other hand, when only the cultivar effects were examined, the Kruskal-Wallis non parametric one-way test was preliminarily applied, calculating χ2 and P value associated.
Symptoms referable to infection (Fig.
All strains of the new fennel pathogen sequenced had identical LSU, SSU, RPB2, TEF1, and TUB2 sequences. Also all ITS sequences were identical, except for a single nucleotide polymorphism (A/G) towards the end of the ITS2 region. All sequences generated during this study were deposited at GenBank; for GenBank accession numbers, see Table
Of the 3312 characters included in the phylogenetic analyses, 294 were parsimony informative (222 from the ITS, 62 from the LSU, 10 from the SSU). The best ML tree (lnL = –14211.5558) revealed by RAxML is shown in Figure
Phylogram of the best ML tree (–lnL = 14211.5558) revealed by RAxML from an analysis of the combined SSU-ITS-LSU matrix of selected Leptosphaeriaceae, showing the phylogenetic position of Ochraceocephala foeniculi (bold red). Taxa in bold black denote new combinations proposed here. ML and MP bootstrap support above 50% are given above or below the branches.
referring to the ochraceous conidial capitula of the type species.
Conidiophores erect, variable in shape and branching, from unbranched, loosely to densely branched up to several times; branching commonly irregularly verticillate. Phialides arising singly or in irregular whorls, cylindrical, lageniform or ampulliform, producing basipetal conidial chains. Conidia in chains, unicellular, thick-walled.
Ochraceocephala foeniculi Voglmayr & Aiello.
Ochraceocephala is phylogenetically closely related to Plenodomus, from which it deviates substantially in morphology. Plenodomus species are characterised by pycnidial phoma-like asexual morphs, and while in two Plenodomus species (P. chrysanthemi, P. tracheiphilus) simple hyphomycetous, phialophora-like synanamorphs have been recorded (
referring to its host genus, Foeniculum (Apiaceae).
Colonies fast-growing, at room temperature (22 ± 1 °C) on CMD reaching 80 mm after 7 d; on MEA 38 mm after 7 d; with dull white to cream surface, upon conidiation becoming beige to olive yellow from the centre, reverse cream with greyish to dark brown centre; cottony, with abundant surface mycelium; sporulation abundant on aerial hyphae. Aerial hyphae hyaline, 2–6 µm wide. Conidiophores hyaline, produced terminally or laterally on aerial hyphae, variable in shape and branching, unbranched, loosely or densely branched up to two times; branching commonly irregularly verticillate. Phialides arising singly or in whorls of 2–5, (3.8–)5.8–13.5(–21.0) × (2.5–)3.0–4.3(–5.5) µm (n = 100), cylindrical, lageniform or ampulliform, often with a distinct collarette, producing basipetal conidial chains; polyphialides rarely present. Conidia (3.2–)3.5–6.0(–8.5) × (2.5–)3.0–4.2(–6.0) µm, l/w (1.0–)1.1–1.5(–2.1) (n = 155), hyaline to yellowish, in masses sand to olive yellow, smooth, mostly globose to subglobose, rarely broadly ellipsoid to pip-shaped, thick-walled.
Ochraceocephala foeniculi, holotype a culture on CMD (7d, 22 °C) b culture on MEA (21d, 22 °C) c conidiophores on aerial hyphae producing yellowish brown conidial masses in chains d–j, l, m unbranched (g–i) and verticillately branched (d–f, j, l, m) conidiophores (MEA, 21d, 22 °C) with phialides; in f with polyphialide (arrow) k, n, o phialides with collarettes (arrows) and young conidia p conidia. All microscopic preparations from MEA (21d, 22 °C) and mounted in water. Scale bars: 200 µm (c); 10 µm (d–j, l, m, p); 5 µm (k, n, o).
Italy (Sicily).
Pathogenic on crown, roots and stems of living Foeniculum vulgare.
Subplenodomus iridicola Crous & Denman, in Crous, Schumacher, Wingfield, Akulov, Denman, Roux, Braun, Burgess, Carnegie, Váczy, Guatimosim, Schwartsburd, Barreto, Hernández-Restrepo, Lombard & Groenewald, Fungal Systematics and Evolution 1: 207. 2018.
In the phylogenetic analyses (Fig.
Acicuseptoria rumicis Quaedvl., Verkley & Crous, Stud. Mycol. 75: 376 (2013).
The monotypic genus Acicuseptoria was described by
The representative isolate (CBS 145654) was pathogenic to fennel plants, and produced symptoms similar to those observed in open field after five days (Fig.
In the experiments on fennel susceptibility there was always a significant effect of the cultivar on all disease parameters (PM, DI and SS) of pathogen infections (p < 0.0001). Otherwise, a not significant cultivar × trial effect (p > 0.56) was observed for parametric variables (PM and DI) in this repeated experiment (Table
ANOVA effects of cultivar and cultivar × trial interactions on plant mortality, disease incidence and severity of symptoms caused by Ochraceocephala foeniculi on inoculated young fennel plants.
Model effect | Parameter | ||||||||
Factor(s) | Plant mortality (PM) 1 | Disease incidence (DI) 1 | Symptom severity (SS) 2 | ||||||
df | F | P value | df | F | P value | χ2 | W | P value | |
Cultivar | 5 | 70.6286 | < 0.0001 | 5 | 33.659 | < 0.0001 | 89.2051 | … | < 0.0001 |
Cultivar × trial | 5 | 0.1273 | 0.98475ns | 5 | 0.789ns | 0.56797ns | … | 0.95873 | 0.0003 |
Regarding susceptibility of fennel to this phytopathogenic fungus, a great variability was detected among the tested cultivars eight days after inoculation. Comprehensively, cultivar ‘Narciso’ was the most susceptible since all disease parameters and its PM value were significantly the highest among the tested cultivars. ‘Apollo’ was also highly susceptible to infection by the new fennel pathogen, significantly differing only in a slightly lower PM value. ‘Pompeo’ displayed PM and DI values similar to those recorded for ‘Apollo’, but its SS score was significantly lower than in the former (Table
Compared susceptibility to crown and root rot infections of six commercial fennel cultivars.
Cultivar | Plant mortality (PM) 1 | Disease incidence (DI) 1 | Symptom severity (SS) 2 |
‘Narciso’ | 72.92 ± 2.08 a | 100 a | 4.15 ± 0.10 a |
‘Apollo’ | 58.33 ± 4.17 b | 100 a | 4.33 ± 0.17 a |
‘Pompeo’ | 45.83 ± 4.17 b | 100 a | 3.37 ± 0.13 b |
‘Aurelio’ | 10.42 ± 2.08 c | 100 a | 2.56 ± 0.06 b |
‘Archimede’ | 0.00 d | 83.33 ± 4.17 b | 1.94 ± 0.10 c |
‘Pegaso’ | 0.00 d | 77.08 ± 2.08 b | 1.48 ± 0.10 d |
In the present study, 32 fungal isolates were recovered from symptomatic fennel plants in Sicily over a 2-year period. Disease symptoms were observed in three farms, and included necrotic lesions and crown and root rot on three different cultivars. The fungal species obtained from symptomatic tissues was identified based on morphological characters and molecular phylogenetic analyses of an ITS-LSU-SSU rDNA matrix, resulting in the description of the fennel pathogen as a new genus and species, Ochraceocephala foeniculi.
In the phylogenetic analyses, O. foeniculi was revealed as sister group of Plenodomus; however, without significant support (Fig.
Within Leptosphaeriaceae, O. foeniculi is remarkable and unique by its complex hyphomycetous asexual morph composed of branched conidiophores with phialidic conidiation and conidia produced in basipetal chains. Asexual morphs in Leptosphaeriaceae are typically coelomycetous and phoma-like, which is also the case in the closest relative of Ochraceocephala, Plenodomus (
Other fungal species belonging to Leptosphaeriaceae, as well as the closely related Didymellaceae (
On the basis of the disease incidence and severity observed in the field, we believe that this disease represents a serious threat to fennel crop in Sicily and may become a major problem also to other areas of fennel production if accidentally introduced. Moreover, infected soil could represent an inoculum source for this fungus. Further studies are needed to examine the life cycle of O. foeniculi and to ascertain the cardinal temperatures of the fungus for successful infection since this pathogen is well established in this representative fennel production area. This information is required for the setup and timing of sustainable approaches for soil disinfection, including solarization and/or fumigation at low rates, to reduce the level of the primary inoculum in the soil and hence the disease amount, like successfully applied for other soilborne plant pathogens (
Although not always conclusive, soil disinfestation and host resistance can be considered environmentally friendly means to be included within integrated pest management (IPM) strategies against crown rot caused by O. foeniculi in order to minimize the number and intensity of fungicide applications.
This research was supported by Research Project 2016–2018 “Monitoraggio, caratterizzazione e controllo sostenibile di microrganismi e artropodi di interesse agrario” WP2-5A722192134.