Research Article |
Corresponding author: André Fraiture ( andre.fraiture@botanicgardenmeise.be ) Academic editor: María P. Martín
© 2019 André Fraiture, Mario Amalfi, Olivier Raspé, Ertugrul Kaya, Ilgaz Akata, Jérôme Degreef.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Fraiture A, Amalfi M, Raspé O, Kaya E, Akata I, Degreef J (2019) Two new species of Amanita sect. Phalloideae from Africa, one of which is devoid of amatoxins and phallotoxins. MycoKeys 53: 93-125. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.53.34560
|
Two new species of Amanita sect. Phalloideae are described from tropical Africa (incl. Madagascar) based on both morphological and molecular (DNA sequence) data. Amanita bweyeyensis sp. nov. was collected, associated with Eucalyptus, in Rwanda, Burundi and Tanzania. It is consumed by local people and chemical analyses showed the absence of amatoxins and phallotoxins in the basidiomata. Surprisingly, molecular analysis performed on the same specimens nevertheless demonstrated the presence of the gene sequence encoding for the phallotoxin phallacidin (PHA gene, member of the MSDIN family). The second species, Amanita harkoneniana sp. nov. was collected in Tanzania and Madagascar. It is also characterised by a complete PHA gene sequence and is suspected to be deadly poisonous. Both species clustered together in a well-supported terminal clade in multilocus phylogenetic inferences (including nuclear ribosomal partial LSU and ITS-5.8S, partial tef1-α, rpb2 and β-tubulin genes), considered either individually or concatenated. This, along with the occurrence of other species in sub-Saharan Africa and their phylogenetic relationships, are briefly discussed. Macro- and microscopic descriptions, as well as pictures and line drawings, are presented for both species. An identification key to the African and Madagascan species of Amanita sect. Phalloideae is provided. The differences between the two new species and the closest Phalloideae species are discussed.
Ectomycorrhizal fungi, Amanita, phylogeny, taxonomy, mycotoxins, tropical Africa, 2 new species
Most representatives of Amanita sect. Phalloideae (Fr.) Quél. are famous worldwide for their high, often deadly, toxicity. Currently, the section Phalloideae comprises nearly 60 described species, a number of which were described only recently, mainly from Asia (
Most of African mycodiversity remains under-explored with only ca. 1500 taxa described to date (
Amatoxins and phallotoxins are responsible for the high toxicity of Amanita sect. Phalloideae. Nevertheless, apart from Amanita alliiodora, considered toxic by the Madagascan people, and the deadly poisonous A. phalloides (incl. “A. capensis”) and probably A. marmorata, no data are available attesting to the toxicity or the edibility of the Madagascan and African species.
In the framework of taxonomic and phylogenetic studies of Amanita sect. Phalloideae, specimens originating from tropical Africa were critically studied. Morphological and multigenic phylogenetic studies proved to be concordant and established the existence of two distinct species that could not be identified as any known taxa. Amanita bweyeyensis from the western province of Rwanda and A. harkoneniana from the Tanzanian Miombo woodlands and Madagascar are described here as new. Their phylogenetic affinities with other Amanita species reported from Africa are discussed and a key to African species of Amanita sect. Phalloideae is provided.
African Amanita phalloides-related specimens held in BR were studied in depth (Degreef 653 from Burundi; Degreef 1257 and 1304, both from Rwanda). A picture appearing in
We also examined for comparison the type specimen of Amanita marmorata subsp. myrtacearum (O.K. Miller 24545, VPI) collected in Hawaii and 3 specimens of Amanita marmorata collected in Australia: H.D. Weatherhead s.n. (= MEL 2028859A) and J.B. Cleland s.n. (= AD-C 3083 and 3085). We unsuccessfully tried to obtain the type specimen of Amanita reidii on loan. Braam Vanwyk informed us that the holotype preserved in PRU had unfortunately been destroyed and no longer exists. Although
Macroscopic characters were deduced from herbarium specimens, as well as from specimen labels, field notes and pictures, when available. Microscopic examinations were carried out using an Olympus BX51 microscope, from herbarium material mounted in ammoniacal Congo Red or in Melzer’s reagent. Measurements were made using a camera lucida and a calibrated scale. In the descriptions, figures between brackets are extreme values, underlined figures are averages, Q values are length/width ratios of spores, l/w values are the same ratios for other types of cells. Mentions like “[60/4/2]” after measurements of spores (or other microscopic structures) mean 60 spores measured, from 4 different basidiomata collected in 2 different places.
Genomic DNA was isolated from CTAB-preserved tissues or dry specimens using a CTAB isolation procedure adapted from Doyle and Doyle (1990). PCR amplification of the ITS region (nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer) and LSU (large subunit ribosomal DNA) was performed using the primer pairs ITS4/ITS5 or ITS1-F/ITS4 and LR0R/LR5, respectively (http://biology.duke.edu/fungi/mycolab/primers.htm). Parts of the protein-coding genes β-tubulin, rpb2 (second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II) and tef-1 (translation elongation factor 1 alpha) were amplified using the primer pairs Am-β-tub-F/Am-β-tub-R, Am-6F/Am-7R and EF1-983F/EF1-1567R, respectively (
Sequencing was performed by Macrogen Inc. (Korea and The Netherlands) using the same primer combinations as for PCR, except for Am-β-tub-F, which was replaced by the shorter primer Am-β-tub-F-Seq (5’-CGGAGCRGGTAACAAYTG-3’) following
Thirty-five sequences of Amanita specimens were newly generated for this study and deposited in GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/; Table
List of collections used for DNA analyses, with origin, GenBank accession numbers and references.
Species | GenBank accession no. | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Specimen voucher | Country | LSU | ITS | rpb2 | tef1–α | βtubulin |
Sect. Phalloideae | ||||||
Amanita alliodora Pat. 1928 | ||||||
DSN062 | Madagascar | KX185612 | KX185611 | – | – | – |
Amanita amerivirosa nom. prov. | ||||||
RET 397-8 | USA | KJ466460 | KJ466398 | – | KJ481964 | KJ466543 |
RET 480-1 | USA | KJ466461 | KJ466399 | KJ466630 | KJ481965 | KJ466544 |
Amanita bisporigera G.F. Atk. 1906 | ||||||
RET 377-9 | USA | KJ466434 | KJ466374 | – | KJ481936 | KJ466501 |
Amanita brunneitoxicaria Thongbai, Raspé& K.D. Hyde 2017 | ||||||
BZ2015-01 | Thailand | – | NR_151655 | KY656879 | – | KY656860 |
Amanita bweyeyensis Fraiture, Raspé & Degreef, sp. nov. | ||||||
clone Agar_8B_S114 | Madagascar | – | KT200567 | – | – | – |
JD 1257 | Rwanda | MK570926 | MK570919 | – | – | – |
JD 1304 | Rwanda | MK570927 | MK570920 | MK570931 | MK570940 | MK570916 |
TS 591 | Tanzania | MK570928 | MK570921 | – | – | – |
Amanita djarilmari E.M. Davison 2017 | ||||||
EMD 008 cl_4 | Australia | – | KU057382 | – | – | – |
EMD 008 cl_5 | Australia | – | KU057383 | – | – | – |
EMD 008 cl_6 | Australia | – | KU057384 | – | – | – |
EMD 5 010 l_1 | Australia | – | KU057393 | – | – | – |
EMD 5 010 l_15 | Australia | – | KU057392 | – | – | – |
EMD 5 010 l_3 | Australia | – | KU057391 | – | – | – |
EMD 5 010 l_5 | Australia | – | KU057390 | – | – | – |
EMD 5 010 l_7 | Australia | – | KU057389 | – | – | – |
EMD 8 013 l_1 | Australia | – | KU057399 | – | – | – |
EMD 8 013 l_2 | Australia | – | KU057400 | – | – | – |
EMD 8 013 l_3 | Australia | – | KU057401 | – | – | – |
EMD 8 013 l_4 | Australia | – | KU057402 | – | – | – |
EMD 8 013 l_5 | Australia | – | KU057403 | – | – | – |
PERTH08776040 | Australia | KY977708 | – | – | MF037234 | MF000743 |
PERTH08776067 l_1 | Australia | KY977704 | KY977732 | MF000755 | MF000750 | MF000742 |
PERTH08776067 l_2 | Australia | KY977704 | KY977733 | MF000755 | MF000750 | MF000742 |
PERTH08776067 l_3 | Australia | KY977704 | KY977734 | MF000755 | MF000750 | MF000742 |
PERTH08776067 l_4 | Australia | KY977704 | KY977735 | MF000755 | MF000750 | MF000742 |
PERTH08776067 l_5 | Australia | KY977704 | KY977736 | MF000755 | MF000750 | MF000742 |
PERTH08776075 l_1 | Australia | KY977706 | KY977737 | – | – | – |
PERTH08776075 l_2 | Australia | KY977706 | KY977738 | – | – | – |
PERTH08776075 l_3 | Australia | KY977706 | KY977739 | – | – | – |
PERTH08776075 l_4 | Australia | KY977706 | KY977740 | – | – | – |
PERTH08776075 l_5 | Australia | KY977706 | KY977741 | – | – | – |
PERTH08776083 l_1 | Australia | KY977710 | KY977742 | – | – | MF000744 |
PERTH08776083 l_2 | Australia | KY977710 | KY977743 | – | – | MF000744 |
PERTH08776083 l_3 | Australia | KY977710 | KY977744 | – | – | MF000744 |
PERTH08776083 l_4 | Australia | KY977710 | KY977745 | – | – | MF000744 |
PERTH08776083 l_5 | Australia | KY977710 | KY977746 | – | – | MF000744 |
Amanita eucalypti O.K. Mill. 1992 | ||||||
PERTH8809828 cl_3 | Australia | KY977707 | KU057380 | MF000758 | MF000751 | MF000746 |
PERTH8809828 cl_4 | Australia | KY977707 | KU057397 | MF000758 | MF000751 | MF000746 |
PERTH8809828 cl_5 | Australia | KY977707 | KU057396 | MF000758 | MF000751 | MF000746 |
PERTH8809828 cl_6 | Australia | KY977707 | KU057395 | MF000758 | MF000751 | MF000746 |
PERTH8809828 cl_7 | Australia | KY977707 | KU057394 | MF000758 | MF000751 | MF000746 |
PERTH8809828 l_2 | Australia | KY977707 | KU057398 | MF000758 | MF000751 | MF000746 |
PERTH8809968 cl_3 | Australia | KY977707 | KU057380 | MF000758 | MF000751 | MF000746 |
PERTH8809968 cl_4 | Australia | KY977707 | KU057381 | MF000758 | MF000751 | MF000746 |
PERTH8809828 cl_1 | Australia | KY977707 | KU057398 | MF000758 | MF000751 | MF000746 |
Amanita exitialis Zhu L. Yang & T.H. Li 2001 | ||||||
HKAS74673 | China | KJ466435 | KJ466375 | KJ466590 | KJ481937 | KJ466502 |
HKAS75774 | China | JX998052 | JX998027 | KJ466591 | JX998001 | KJ466503 |
HKAS75775 | China | JX998053 | JX998026 | KJ466592 | JX998002 | KJ466504 |
HKAS75776 | China | JX998051 | JX998025 | KJ466593 | JX998003 | KJ466505 |
Amanita fuliginea Hongo 1953 | ||||||
HKAS75780 | China | JX998048 | JX998023 | KJ466595 | JX997995 | KJ466507 |
HKAS75781 | China | JX998050 | JX998021 | KJ466596 | JX997994 | KJ466508 |
HKAS75782 | China | JX998049 | JX998022 | KJ466597 | JX997996 | KJ466509 |
HKAS77132 | China | KJ466436 | KJ466375 | KJ466598 | KJ481939 | KJ466510 |
HKAS79685 | China | KJ466437 | KJ466376 | KJ466594 | KJ481938 | KJ466506 |
Amanita fuligineoides P. Zhang & Zhu L. Yang 2010 | ||||||
HKAS52727 | China | JX998047 | JX998024 | KJ466599 | – | KJ466511 |
LHJ140722-13 | China | KP691685 | KP691696 | KP691705 | KP691674 | KP691715 |
LHJ140722-18 | China | KP691686 | KP691697 | KP691706 | KP691675 | KP691716 |
Amanita gardneri E.M. Davison 2017 | ||||||
EMD 8-2010 cl_1 | Australia | – | KU057387 | – | – | – |
EMD 8-2010 cl_3 | Australia | – | KU057388 | – | – | – |
EMD 8-2010 cl_4 | Australia | – | KU057386 | – | – | – |
EMD 8-2010 cl_6 | Australia | – | KU057385 | – | – | – |
PERTH08776121 | Australia | KY977712 | – | MF000756 | MF000752 | MF000748 |
Amanita griseorosea Q. Cai, Zhu L. Yang & Y.Y. Cui 2016 | ||||||
HKAS77334 | China | KJ466476 | KJ466413 | KJ466661 | KJ481994 | KJ466580 |
HKAS77333 | China | KJ466475 | KJ466412 | KJ466660 | KJ481993 | KJ466579 |
Amanita harkoneniana Fraiture & Saarimäi, sp. nov. | ||||||
P Pirot SN | Madagascar | MK570929 | MK570922 | MK570938 | MK570941 | MK570917 |
TS 1061 | Tanzania | MK570930 | MK570923 | – | – | – |
Amanita marmorata Cleland & E.-J. Gilbert 1941 | ||||||
HW N | Australia | MK570931 | MK570924 | MK570939 | MK570942 | MK570918 |
PERTH 8690596 cl_1 | Australia | KY977711 | KU057408 | – | – | MF000749 |
PERTH 8690596 cl_2 | Australia | KY977711 | KU057404 | – | – | MF000749 |
PERTH 8690596 cl_3 | Australia | KY977711 | KU057405 | – | – | MF000749 |
PERTH 8690596 cl_4 | Australia | KY977711 | KU057406 | – | – | MF000749 |
PERTH 8690596 cl_5 | Australia | KY977711 | KU057407 | – | – | MF000749 |
RET 623-7 | Australia | KP757874 | KP757875 | – | – | – |
RET 85-9 | Australia | MG252697 | MG252696 | – | – | – |
Amanita marmorata subsp. myrtacearum O.K. Mill., Hemmes & G. Wong 1996 | ||||||
DED 5845 | Hawai | AY325881 | AY325826 | – | – | – |
Amanita millsii E.M. Davison & G.M. Gates 2017 | ||||||
HKAS77322 | Australia | KJ466457 | KJ466395 | KJ466643 | KJ481978 | KJ466557 |
HO581533 l_2 | Australia | KY977713 | KY977715 | MF000753 | MF000759 | MF000760 |
HO581533 l_1 | Australia | KY977713 | KY977714 | MF000753 | MF000759 | MF000760 |
HO581533 l_3 | Australia | KY977713 | KY977716 | MF000753 | MF000759 | MF000760 |
HO581533 l_5 | Australia | KY977713 | KY977717 | MF000753 | MF000759 | MF000760 |
Amanita molliuscula Q. Cai, Zhu L. Yang & Y.Y. Cui 2016 | ||||||
HKAS75555 | China | KJ466471 | KJ466408 | KJ466638 | KJ481973 | KJ466552 |
HMJAU20469 | China | KJ466473 | KJ466410 | KJ466640 | KJ481975 | KJ466554 |
HKAS77324 | China | NG_057038 | NR_147633 | KJ466639 | KJ481974 | KJ466553 |
Amanita ocreata Peck 1909 | ||||||
HKAS79686 | USA | KJ466442 | KJ466381 | KJ466607 | KJ481947 | KJ466518 |
Amanita pallidorosea P. Zhang & Zhu L. Yang 2010 | ||||||
HKAS61937 | China | KJ466443 | KJ466382 | KJ466609 | KJ481949 | KJ466520 |
HKAS71023 | Japan | KJ466444 | KJ466383 | KJ466624 | KJ481960 | KJ466536 |
HKAS75483 | China | KJ466445 | KJ466384 | KJ466623 | KJ481959 | KJ466535 |
HKAS75783 | China | JX998055 | JX998035 | KJ466625 | JX998010 | KJ466537 |
HKAS75784 | China | JX998056 | JX998036 | KJ466626 | JX998009 | KJ466538 |
HKAS75786 | China | JX998054 | JX998037 | KJ466627 | JX998011 | KJ466539 |
HKAS77329 | China | KJ466447 | KJ466387 | KJ466610 | KJ481950 | KJ466521 |
HKAS77348 | China | KJ466448 | KJ466387 | KJ466611 | KJ481951 | KJ466522 |
HKAS77349 | China | KJ466449 | KJ466389 | KJ466628 | KJ481961 | KJ466540 |
HKAS77327 | China | KJ466446 | KJ466386 | KJ466608 | KJ481948 | KJ466519 |
Amanita parviexitialis Q. Cai, Zhu L. Yang & Y.Y. Cui 2016 | ||||||
HKAS79049 | China | NG_057092 | – | KT971345 | KT971343 | KT971346 |
Amanita phalloides Secr. 1833 | ||||||
HKAS75773 | USA | JX998060 | JX998031 | KJ466612 | JX998000 | KJ466523 |
Amanita rimosa P. Zhang & Zhu L. Yang 2010 | ||||||
HKAS75778 | China | JX998045 | JX998019 | KJ466616 | JX998006 | KJ466527 |
HKAS75779 | China | JX998046 | JX998020 | KJ466617 | JX998004 | KJ466528 |
HKAS77105 | China | KJ466452 | KJ466391 | KJ466618 | KJ481954 | KJ466529 |
HKAS77120 | China | KJ466453 | KF479044 | KJ466619 | KJ481955 | KJ466530 |
HKAS77279 | China | KJ466454 | KJ466392 | KJ466620 | KJ481956 | KJ466531 |
HKAS77335 | China | KJ466455 | KJ466393 | KJ466621 | KJ481957 | KJ466532 |
HKAS77336 | China | KJ466456 | KJ466394 | KJ466622 | KJ481958 | KJ466533 |
HKAS75777 | China | JX998044 | JX998018 | KJ466615 | JX998005 | KJ466526 |
Amanita sp. 10 ZLY2014 | ||||||
HKAS77322 | Australia | KJ466457 | KJ466395 | KJ466643 | KJ481978 | KJ466557 |
Amanita sp. 2 ZLY2014 | ||||||
HKAS77350 | China | KJ466462 | KJ466400 | KJ466631 | KJ481966 | KJ466545 |
Amanita sp. 3 ZLY2014 | ||||||
HKAS77342 | China | KJ466463 | KF479045 | KJ466632 | KJ481967 | KJ466546 |
HKAS77343 | China | KJ466464 | KJ466401 | KJ466633 | KJ481968 | KJ466547 |
HKAS77344 | China | KJ466465 | KJ466402 | KJ466634 | KJ481969 | KJ466548 |
HKAS77351 | China | KJ466466 | KJ466403 | KJ466635 | KJ481970 | KJ466549 |
Amanita sp. 5 ZLY2014 | ||||||
RET 422-8 | USA | KJ466469 | KJ466406 | KJ466649 | KJ481983 | KJ466563 |
RET 493-6 | USA | KJ466470 | KJ466407 | KJ466650 | KJ481984 | KJ466564 |
Amanita sp. 8 ZLY2014 | ||||||
HKAS75150 | Bangladesh | KJ466477 | KJ466414 | KJ466641 | KJ481976 | KJ466555 |
Amanita sp. 9 ZLY2014 | ||||||
HKAS77323 | China | KJ466478 | KJ466415 | KJ466642 | KJ481977 | KJ466556 |
Amanita suballiacea (Murrill) Murrill 1941 | ||||||
RET 490-1 | USA | KJ466485 | KJ466420 | KJ466601 | KJ481941 | KJ466513 |
RET 491-7 | USA | KJ466486 | KJ466421 | KJ466602 | KJ481942 | KJ466514 |
RET 478-6 | USA | KJ466484 | KJ466419 | KJ466600 | KJ481940 | KJ466512 |
Amanita subfuliginea Q. Cai, Zhu L. Yang & Y.Y. Cui 2016 | ||||||
HKAS77347 | China | KJ466468 | KJ466405 | KJ466637 | KJ481972 | KJ466551 |
HKAS77326 | China | KJ466467 | KJ466404 | KJ466636 | KJ481971 | KJ466550 |
Amanita subjunquillea S. Imai 1933 | ||||||
HKAS74993 | China | KJ466489 | KJ466424 | KJ466652 | KJ481987 | KJ466570 |
HKAS75770 | China | JX998062 | JX998034 | KJ466653 | JX997999 | KJ466571 |
HKAS75771 | China | JX998063 | JX998032 | KJ466654 | JX997997 | KJ466572 |
HKAS75772 | China | JX998061 | JX998033 | KJ466655 | JX997998 | KJ466573 |
HKAS77325 | China | KJ466490 | KJ466425 | KJ466656 | KJ481988 | KJ466574 |
HKAS77345 | China | KJ466491 | KJ466426 | KJ466657 | KJ481989 | KJ466575 |
HMJAU20412 | China | KJ466492 | KJ466427 | KJ466658 | KJ481990 | KJ466576 |
HMJAU23276 | China | KJ466493 | KJ466428 | KJ466659 | KJ481991 | KJ466577 |
HKAS63418 | China | KJ466488 | KJ466423 | KJ466651 | KJ481986 | KJ466569 |
Amanita subpallidorosea Hai J. Li 2015 | ||||||
LHJ140923--41 | China | KP691692 | KP691683 | KP691701 | KP691670 | KP691711 |
LHJ140923-55 | China | KP691693 | KP691680 | KP691702 | KP691671 | KP691712 |
LHJ140923-17 | China | KP691691 | KP691677 | KP691700 | KP691669 | KP691713 |
Amanita virosa Secr. 1833 | ||||||
HKAS71040 | Japan | KJ466496 | KJ466429 | KJ466665 | KJ481997 | KJ466584 |
HMJAU20396 | China | JX998059 | JX998029 | – | JX998008 | KJ466585 |
HMJAU23303 | China | KJ466497 | KJ466430 | KJ466666 | KJ481998 | KJ466586 |
HMJAU23304 | China | KJ466498 | KJ466431 | KJ466667 | KJ481999 | KJ466587 |
HKAS56694 | Finland | JX998058 | JX998030 | KJ466664 | JX998007 | KJ466583 |
Amanita halloides ar lba Costantin & L.M. Dufour 1895 | ||||||
AF2322 | Belgium | – | MK570925 | – | – | – |
Amanita halloides ar mbrina (Ferry) Maire 1937 | ||||||
PREM 48618 | South Africa | AY325882 | AY325825 | – | – | – |
Amanita eidii Eicker & Greuning 1993 | ||||||
PRU 4306 | South Africa | AY325883 | AY325824 | – | – | – |
Amanita p | ||||||
CM13 09 | New Caledonia | – | KY774002 | – | – | – |
Amanita p Kerala01 | ||||||
RET 91-7 | India | – | KC855219 | – | – | – |
Incertae sedis | ||||||
Amanita ballerina Raspé Thongbai & K.D. Hyde 2017 | ||||||
OR1014 | Thailand | – | KY747466 | KY656883 | – | KY656864. |
OR1026 | Thailand | MH157079 | KY747467 | KY656884 | – | KY656865 |
Amanita franzii Zhu L. Yang, Y.Y. Cui & Q. Cai 201 | ||||||
HKAS77321 | China | KJ466481 | MH508357 | KJ466646 | MH508798 | KJ466560 |
HKAS91231 | China | MH486525 | MH508358 | MH485994 | MH508801 | MH485516 |
Amanita pseudogemmata Hongo 1974 | ||||||
HKAS85889 | China | MH486768 | – | MH486186 | MH508995 | MH485692 |
HKAS84744 | China | MH486767 | – | MH486185 | MH508994 | MH485691 |
Amanita zangii Zhu L. Yang, T.H. Li & X.L. Wu 2001 | ||||||
GDGM29241 | China | KJ466499 | KJ466432 | KJ466668 | KJ482000 | KJ466588 |
HKAS77331 | China | KJ466500 | KJ466433 | KJ466669 | KJ482001 | KJ466589 |
Sect. Validae | ||||||
Amanita cf spissacea S. Imai 1933 | ||||||
OR1214 | Thailand | KY747478 | KY747469 | KY656886 | – | KY656867 |
A combined dataset (including nuclear ribosomal partial LSU and ITS-5.8S, partial tef1-α, rpb2 and β-tubulin genes), comprising sequences from 94 collections including the outgroup and an ITS-5.8S / LSU dataset of 69 sequences, including several clones derived from the same collections and the outgroup, were constructed and used for further phylogenetic analyses.
Amanita cf. spissacea voucher OR1214 and Amanita subjunquillea voucher HKAS63418 were used as outgroups for the combined and ITS-LSU datasets, respectively (
Nucleotide sequences were automatically aligned using the MUSCLE algorithm (Edgar 2004) with default settings. The alignment was further optimised and manually adjusted as necessary by direct examination with the software Se-Al v. 2.0a11 (University of Oxford).
The assignment of codon positions in the protein-coding sequences was confirmed by translating nucleotide sequences into predicted amino acid sequences using MacClade 4.0 (Maddison and Maddison 2000) and then compared with the annotated Amanita brunnescens sequences AFTOL-ID 673.
Potential ambiguously aligned segments, especially in the three introns present in tef-1 and β-tubulin gene sequences and in the ITS-5.8S alignment, were detected by Gblocks v0.91b (
To detect the possible bias from substitution saturation and to evaluate the phylogenetic signal, we tested each partition of the combined dataset and the ITS-LSU dataset by using Xia’s test (
Models of evolution for BI were estimated using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) as implemented in Modeltest 3.7 (
The dataset was subdivided into 10 data partitions: tef-1 1st and -2nd codon positions, tef-1 -3rd codon positions, tef-1 introns and rpb2 1st and -2nd codon positions, rpb2 -3rd codon positions, β-tubulin 1st and -2nd codon positions, β-tubulin -3rd codon positions, β-tubulin intron, ITS, LSU. Phylogenetic analyses were performed separately for each individual and concatenated loci using Bayesian Inference (BI) as implemented in MrBayes v3. 2 (
The best-fit models for each partition were implemented as partition specific models within partitioned mixed-model analyses of the combined dataset (Table
Summary of data sets of ITS rDNA, nuc-LSU rDNA, tef1-α, rpb2 and β-tubulin.
Datasets | ||||||||||
Properties | tef1 1st & 2nd | tef1 3rd | tef1 introns | rpb2 1st& 2nd | rpb2 3rd | β-tubulin 1st& 2nd | β-tubulin 3rd | β-tubulin introns | nucLSU | ITS |
Alignment size | 296 | 147 | 147 | 452 | 226 | 167 | 83 | 171 | 887 | 935 |
Excluded characters | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 557 |
Model selected | GTR+I+G | GTR+G | HKY+I | GTR+I | GTR+G | SYM+I+G | HKY+G | HKY+G | GTR+I+G | HKY+I+G |
-Likelihood score | 780.2892 | 1857.1256 | 1535.9010 | 1285.5159 | 3033.6099 | 1319.9380 | 1108.1555 | 1023.9042 | 3403.9714 | 4844.7563 |
Base frequencies | ||||||||||
Freq. A = | 0.3179 | 0.1686 | 0.2479 | 0.2914 | 0.2478 | Equal | 0.1745 | 0.2254 | 0.2877 | 0.3023 |
Freq. C = | 0.2276 | 0.3231 | 0.2175 | 0.2132 | 0.1956 | Equal | 0.3113 | 0.1690 | 0.1671 | 0.1846 |
Freq. G = | 0.2536 | 0.2159 | 0.1807 | 0.2761 | 0.2541 | Equal | 0.2257 | 0.2228 | 0.2937 | 0.2068 |
Freq. T = | 0.2010 | 0.2924 | 0.3540 | 0.2192 | 0.3025 | Equal | 0.2885 | 0.3827 | 0.2515 | 0.3062 |
Proportion of invariable sites | 0.8042 | – | 0.0940 | 0.8283 | – | 0.4975 | – | – | 0.5726 | 0.2855 |
Gamma shape | 0.7888 | 2.1595 | - | - | 2.7065 | 4.2837 | 3.7320 | 0.8697 | 0.5839 | 0.8470 |
Test of substitution saturation | ||||||||||
Iss | 0.263 | 0.354 | 0.723 | 0.335 | 0.308 | 0.156 | 0.306 | 0.662 | 0.499 | 0.472 |
Iss.cSym | 0.683 | 0.721 | 0.928 | 0.697 | 0.685 | 0.706 | 0.875 | 0.776 | 0.764 | 0.707 |
P (Sym) | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.2135 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.402 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
Iss.cAsym | 0.354 | 0.668 | 0.802 | 0.502 | 0.458 | 0.407 | 0.711 | 0.535 | 0.675 | 0.645 |
P (Asym) | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.6284 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.354 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
To detect topological conflicts amongst data partitions, the nodes between the majority-rule consensus trees obtained in the ML analysis from the individual datasets were compared with the software compat.py (available at www.lutzonilab.net/downloads). Paired trees were examined for conflicts only involving nodes with ML BS > 75% (
Two major toxin-encoding genes, AMA1 and PHA1, directly encode for α-amanitin and the related bicyclic heptapeptide phallacidin, the lethal peptide toxins of poisonous mushrooms in the genus Amanita. α-Amanitin and phallacidin are synthesised as pro-proteins of 35 and 34 amino acids, respectively, in the ribosomes and are later cleaved by a prolyl oligopeptidase (
The toxins genes and MSDIN (cyclic peptide precursor) family members and related sequences were amplified from total genomic DNA with two consecutive PCR reactions, using the products of the first PCR as templates for the second one. For the first PCR, we used degenerated primers forward (5’ATGTCNGAYATYAAYGCNACNCG3’) and the reverse primer (5’CCAAGCCTRAYAWRGTCMACAAC3’), following the cycling condition detailed in
For the nested PCR amplification (using the PCR products above as the amplification template of AMA1 and PHA1 genes), primers targeting conserved regions of MSDINs family were obtained from previous studies (
Thermal cycling conditions were: initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, followed by 33 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 59°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 30 s and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min, for all reactions except for the ones involving primers from
Two groups of dried mushrooms, i.e. with cuticle (n=3) and without cuticle (n=3), were analysed. For each specimen, 100 mg of dry tissues were ground and homogenised in 3 ml extraction medium (methanol:water:0.01 M HCl [5:4:1, v/v/v]) using a tissue homogeniser. After 1 hour of incubation, all extracts were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min, the supernatant was filtered using a 0.45 mm syringe filter and 20 µl of this supernatant was injected in the RP-HPLC device for toxin detection.
The α-amanitin and phalloidin standards were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). The β-amanitin, γ-amanitin and phallacidin standards were obtained from Enzo Life Sciences (Farmingdale, NY, USA). The solvents used in this study were all HPLC grade. Stock solutions of all toxins (100 µg/ml) were prepared in methanol. The calibration standards of all toxins were diluted in the extraction fluid in concentrations of 1, 5, 20, 100, 200, 500 ng/ml. Calibration curves were produced for each toxin; they were linear over the range of interest (R2 > 0.99).
Chromatography conditions for the procedure followed in this study were reported by
By comparing the tree topologies obtained for the individual datasets, no significant conflict, involving significantly supported nodes, was found using the 75% ML BP criterion; the datasets were therefore combined.
The test of substitution saturation (Table
The 50% majority-rule consensus tree from Bayesian inference of the combined dataset. Thickened branches in bold represent ML BS support greater than 75% and BPP greater than 0.95; thickened branches in grey denote branches supported by either ML BS or BPP. For selected nodes ML BS support value and BPP are, respectively, indicated to the left and right of slashes. The new taxa are highlighted in the shaded box. AMA and PHA indicate the presence of amatoxins and phallotoxins, respectively, detected by HPLC. NT indicates not tested.
The ITS-LSU dataset and the final combined DNA sequence alignments of all loci (β-tubulin, rpb2, ITS, LSU, tef-1) alignments contained 15 and 35 OTUs and were 1575 and 3133 sites long including gaps, respectively. Sequence data and statistical analysis for each dataset are provided in Table
The topologies obtained by analysing the combined dataset and the ITS-LSU dataset were highly congruent with published trees (
The 50% majority-rule consensus tree from Bayesian inference of the combined nuclear ITS-5.8S and LSU sequences. Thickened branches in bold indicate bootstrap support greater than 70% and Bayesian posterior probability greater than 0.95. For selected nodes, parsimony bootstrap support value and Bayesian posterior probabilities are, respectively, indicated to the left and right of slashes. The new taxa are highlighted in the shaded box.
Morphological examination showed combinations of morphological features unique to and characteristic of each, thereby defining two morphotypes. The critical morphological features that differentiate them are the following. The first species grows under Eucalyptus. Its bulb at stipe base is (sub-)globose, neither pointed nor rooting. The ring is striated and the smell sweetish and conspicuous. The second species is not bound with Eucalyptus and has been collected in Miombo woodland and in a garden. The bulb at the stipe base is turnip-shaped to rooting. The ring is smooth or vaguely plicate and the smell weak, resembling raw potato. We therefore concluded that these two morphotypes / clades represent two distinct new species, which we describe below resp. as A. bweyeyensis sp. nov. and A. harkoneniana sp. nov.
By using a combination of the degenerated primers cited above, we obtained a complete 17-mer sequence of phallacidin precursor for the three specimens of A. bweyeyensis and the two specimens of A. harkoneniana studied (Table
PCR products (phalloidin, PHA gene) amplified from A. bweyeyensis and A. harkoneniana with degenerate primers, compared to the PHA gene sequences available on GenBank.
Phallacidin precursor (17-mer) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phallacidin mature peptide | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M | S | D | I | N | A | T | R | L | P | A | W | L | V | D | C | P | C | V | G | D | D | V | N | P | V | L | T | R | G | Q | R | |
MK570933 A. bweyeyensis JD 1304 | ATG | TCT | GAC | ATC | AAT | GCC | ACC | CGT | CTC | CCT | GCY | TGG | CTT | GTA | GAC | TGC | CCC | TGC | GTC | GGT | GAC | GAC | TGC | AAC | CCC | GTA | CTC | ACT | CGT | GGG | CAG | AGG |
MK570932 A. bweyeyensis JD 1257 | ATG | TCT | GAC | ATC | AAT | GCC | ACC | CGT | CTC | CCT | GCY | TGG | CTT | GTA | GAC | TGC | CCC | TGC | GTC | GGT | GAC | GAC | TGC | AAC | CCC | GTA | CTC | ACT | CGT | GGG | CAG | AGG |
MK570934 A. bweyeyensis TS 591 | ATG | TCT | GAC | ATC | AAT | GCC | ACC | CGT | CTT | CCT | GCT | TGG | CTT | GTA | GAC | TGC | CCC | TGC | GTC | GGT | GAC | GAC | TGC | AAC | CCC | GTA | CTC | ACT | CGT | GGG | CAG | AGG |
MK570936 A. harkoneniana TS 1061 | ATG | TCT | GAC | ATC | AAT | GCC | ACC | CGT | CTT | CCT | GCY | TGG | CTY | GTA | GAY | TGC | CCA | TGC | GTC | GGT | GAC | GAC | TGC | AAC | CCC | GTT | CTC | ACT | CGT | GGG | CAG | AGG |
MK570935 A. harkoneniana P PIROT SN | ATG | TCT | GAC | ATC | AAT | GCC | ACC | CGT | CTT | CCT | GCY | TGG | CTY | GTA | GAY | TGC | CCC | TGC | GTC | GGT | GAC | GAC | TGC | AAC | CCC | GTT | CTC | ACT | CGT | GGG | CAG | AGG |
V | N | R | L | L | T | R | G | E | S | |||||||||||||||||||||||
KF387488 A. exitialis | ATG | TCT | GAC | ATC | AAT | GCC | ACC | CGT | CTT | CCT | GCC | TGG | CTC | GTA | GAC | TGC | CCA | TGC | GTC | GGT | GAC | GAC | GTC | AAC | CGC | CTC | CTC | ACT | CGT | GGC | GAG | AGC |
V | N | R | L | L | T | R | G | E | R | |||||||||||||||||||||||
EU196142 A. bisporigera | ATG | TCT | GAC | ATC | AAT | GCC | ACC | CGT | CTT | CCT | GCT | TGG | CTT | GTA | GAC | TGC | CCA | TGC | GTC | GGT | GAC | GAC | GTC | AAC | CGT | CTC | CTC | ACT | CGT | GGT | GAG | AGG |
V | N | F | I | L | T | R | G | Q | K | |||||||||||||||||||||||
KF546298 A. fuligineoides | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | CCT | GCT | TGG | CTT | GTA | GAT | TGC | CCA | TGC | GTT | GGT | GAC | GAT | GTC | AAC | TTC | ATC | CTC | ACT | CGT | GGC | CAG | AAG |
V | N | R | L | L | A | R | G | E | K | |||||||||||||||||||||||
KF546296 A. fuliginea | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | CCT | GCT | TGG | CTT | GTA | GAC | TGC | CCA | TGC | GTC | GGT | GAC | GAC | GTT | AAC | CGC | CTC | CTC | GCT | CGT | GGC | GAG | AAG |
I | N | R | L | L | T | R | G | E | K | |||||||||||||||||||||||
KF552098 A. pallidorosea | ATG | TCT | GAT | ATT | AAT | GCT | ACG | CGT | CTT | CCC | GCC | TGG | CTT | GTA | GAC | TGC | CCA | TGC | GTC | GGT | GAC | GAC | ATC | AAC | CGC | CTC | CTC | ACT | CGT | GGC | GAG | AAG |
KF546303 A. phalloides | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | CCT | GCT | TGG | CTT | GTA | GAT | TGC | CCA | TGC | GTC | GGT | GAC | GAC | ATC | AAC | CGC | CTC | CTC | ACC | CGC | GGC | GAG | AAG |
KC778570 A. oberwinklerana | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | CCT | GCT | TGG | CTT | GTA | GAT | TGC | CCA | TGC | GTC | GGT | GAC | GAC | ATC | AAC | CGC | CTC | CTC | ACT | CGT | GGC | GAG | AAG |
S | N | R | L | L | T | R | G | E | K | |||||||||||||||||||||||
KC778568 A. subjunquillea | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | CCT | GCT | TGG | CTT | GTA | GAT | TGC | CCA | TGT | GTC | GGT | GAC | GAC | ATC | AGC | CGC | CTT | CTC | ACT | CGT | GGC | GAG | AAG |
KF546306 A. rimosa | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | CCT | GCT | TGG | CTT | GTA | GAC | TGC | CCA | TGT | GTC | GGT | GAC | GAC | ATC | AGC | CGC | CTT | CTC | ACT | CGT | GGC | GAG | AAG |
Amanita bweyeyensis differs from the closest Amanita species by: pileus first pale brownish-grey then entirely whitish or with a faintly yellowish or pale beige shade, basal bulb of the stipe globose, neither pointed nor rooting, basidiospores subglobose to widely ellipsoid (Q = 1.10–1.17–1.28), absence of α- and β-amanitin, phalloidin and phallacidin in its basidiomata, connection with the genus Eucalyptus and distribution in Burundi, Rwanda and Tanzania.
RWANDA. Western Prov.: buffer zone Nyungwe forest, Bweyeye (02°36.62'S; 29°14.04'E), ca. 2050 m alt., 16 Apr. 2015, J.Degreef 1304 (BR!).
Primordium subglobose, smooth, whitish or with a weak olive tint. Pileus 40–73–120 mm diam., first hemispherical then expanding to regularly convex or applanate, without umbo; margin even, not striate nor appendiculate, in some mature specimens the pileipellis does not reach the edge of the pileus, leaving free the extreme tip of the lamellae; first pale brownish-grey (close to 6B2 or 6C2–3), then often entirely whitish or with a faintly yellowish or pale beige shade (between 4A2 and 5B2); somewhat viscid, smooth, devoid of veil remnants. Lamellae free, white, becoming slightly yellowish when old and ochraceous, pinkish-beige to pale pinkish-brown on the exsiccates with a narrow white and fluffy edge; mixed with an equal number of lamellulae which are very variable in length and are usually truncated; sub-distant, 8–9 lamellae and lamellulae per cm at 1 cm from the edge of the pileus, about 120–160 lamellae and lamellulae in total (counts on 5 basidiomata), 3–14 mm broad, serrate when seen with a magnifying glass. Stipe 65–95–152 × 7–25 mm, ratio length of the stipe/diam. of pileus = 1.04–1.25–1.38; sub-cylindrical, slightly wider just under lamellae, gradually and slightly widened from top to bottom, white, with finely fibrillose surface, hollow (at least on exsiccates). Ring white, hanging, membranous but thin and fragile, finely fibrillose, smooth to somewhat plicate longitudinally, upper part adhering to the stipe and often more or less striate. Basal bulb of the stipe globose, sometimes a bit elongated but neither pointed nor rooting, up to 45 mm wide, surrounded by a white volva (also white inside), membranous, up to 30–35 mm high. Context white, soft; smell sweetish, conspicuous; taste not recorded.
Basidiospores hyaline, with thin, amyloid wall, (globose-) subglobose to widely ellipsoid (-ellipsoid), rather often with a mangiform or amygdaliform profile, (7.5-) 8.0–8.81–9.5 (-11.0) × (6.0-) 7.0–7.54–8.5 (-9.0) µm, Q = (1.00-) 1.10–1.17–1.28 (-1.58) [112/4/2]. Basidia 4-spored, without clamp, thin-walled, clavate, often rather abruptly swollen, 36–42.3–50 × (8.0-) 10.5–12.0–14 (-15) µm, l/w = 2.6–3.59–4.2 (-5.5) [66/4/2]. Lamellar edge sterile, composed of sphaeropedunculate marginal cells which are widely clavate to pyriform, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, without clamp, 18–26.3–32 (-37) × 12–17.0–20 (-33) µm, l/w = (1.00-) 1.33–1.57–1.83 (-2.33) [40/4/2]. General veil (volva) mostly composed of cylindrical hyphae, with very different diameters, (15-) 35–80 (-110) × 2–8.5–15 (-26) µm, hyaline, with smooth and thin wall, septate, with rather frequent anastomoses between parallel hyphae, without clamps, branched, mixed with very few sphaerocysts, thin-walled, smooth, globose to ovoid, 33–76–125 × (25-) 32–56–95 µm, l/w = 1.00–1.52–2.25 [20/2/2].
At present, the species is only known from Burundi, Rwanda and Tanzania but, according to its ecology, it could probably be observed in all Eucalyptus plantations in tropical Africa and possibly in South Africa as well. Consequently, if the species is collected for consumption, care should be taken to avoid confusion with A. marmorata, a species growing in the same biotopes and suspected to be highly toxic.
On the ground, under Eucalyptus. The label of Saarimäki 591 indicates “in Acacia and Eucalyptus forest” whereas the legend of the associated picture (
This species is named after the collection locality of the type specimen in Rwanda.
BURUNDI. Muravya Prov.: Bugarama, 9 Jan. 2011, J.Degreef 653 (BR). – RWANDA. Western Prov.: buffer zone Nyungwe forest, Bweyeye (02°36.79'S; 29°14.01'E), ca. 2040 m alt., 20 Oct. 2014, J.Degreef 1257 (BR); Ibidem (02°36.62'S; 29°14.04'E), ca. 2050 m alt., 16 Apr. 2015, J.Degreef 1304 (holotype: BR!). – TANZANIA. Pare District: South Pare Mts., Mpepera, ca. 1600 m alt., 5 Dec. 1990, T.Saarimäki et al. 591 (H).
During collecting field trips in Rwanda, one of us (JD) was confused by observing local people (Abasangwabutaka) picking huge quantities of this mushroom in old Eucalyptus plantations and eating them (after removal of the cuticle) without experiencing any trouble. The species was not observed to be eaten in Burundi and is probably not used in Tanzania either.
It is quite likely that the specimen shown in a picture by
A comparison with the closely related species is given in the chapter “discussion” below.
Amanita harkoneniana differs from the closest Amanita species by: pileus first whitish to pale yellowish-beige then entirely whitish, devoid of veil remnants, basal bulb of the stipe turnip-shaped or irregularly elongated and more or less rooting, basidiospores subglobose to widely ellipsoid (Q = 1.04–1.13–1.25), basidia 34–37.5–41 µm long and growth without connection with the genus Eucalyptus, in Tanzania and Madagascar.
TANZANIA. Tabora District: ca. 10 km S of Tabora, Kipalapala, ca. 1200 m alt., 12 Dec. 1991, T.Saarimäki et al. 1061 (H!).
Primordium smooth, subglobose but with a more or less conical or irregular rooting part; veil whitish; pileus with a weak brownish tint (around 4B2–3 and 5B2–3 but paler). Pileus 35–53–70 mm diam., first hemispherical, then largely conical or convex to nearly applanate, often with a deflexed margin, without umbo; margin even, neither striate (sometimes striate on exsiccates) nor appendiculate; first whitish to pale yellowish-beige (between 4A2 and 4B2) then entirely whitish; slightly viscid when young, smooth, devoid of veil remnants. Lamellae white, becoming slightly yellowish when old and pale to dark brownish in exsiccates with a narrow white and fluffy edge, free, mixed with an equal number of lamellulae which are very variable in length and are usually truncated, sub-distant, 8–10 lamellae and lamellulae per cm at 1 cm from the edge of the pileus, about 125–215 lamellae + lamellulae in total (counts on 2 basidiomata), ventricose, very finely serrate when seen with a magnifying glass. Stipe 65–130 × 8–14 mm, sub-cylindrical, slightly wider just under the lamellae, gradually and slightly widened from top to bottom, white, with finely fibrillose surface, hollow (at least in exsiccates) or stuffed. Ring white, hanging, membranous but thin and fragile, upper part adhering to the stipe. Basal bulb of the stipe turnip-shaped or irregularly elongated, more or less rooting, surrounded by a white volva (also white inside), membranous, up to 40–60 mm high. Context white, soft, very thin along the margin of the pileus, much thicker near the stipe; smell weak resembling raw potato [Harkonen pers. comm.], very variable according to specimens but mostly of shellfish as in Russula xerampelina, especially for mature and old specimens [P. Pirot, pers. comm. about specimens from Madagascar], taste mild, then unpleasant [description of the Tanzanian specimen].
Basidiospores hyaline, with thin, rather weakly amyloid wall, (globose-) subglobose to widely ellipsoid (-ellipsoid), (6.5-) 7.0–8.07–8.6 (-10.0) × (6.0-) 6.5–7.15–8.0 (-8.5) µm, Q = (1.00-) 1.04–1.13–1.25 (-1.33) [53/3/2]. Basidia 4-spored, without clamp, clavate, often rather abruptly swollen, (30-) 34–37.5–41 (-46) × 9.0–10.4–11.0 (-13.0) µm, l/w = 3.00–3.60–4.40 (-4.90) [31/3/2]. Lamellar edge sterile, composed of marginal cells which are widely clavate to pyriform, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, not clamped, 26–32.2–40 × 13–16.8–20 µm, l/w = 1.56–1.93–2.23 [10/1/1]. General veil (volva) mostly composed of cylindrical hyphae, with very different diameters, (20-) 33–50 (-110) × 4–11 (-15) µm, hyaline, with smooth and thin wall, septate but without clamps, with occasional anastomoses between parallel hyphae, branched, mixed with a few scattered hyaline sphaerocysts, globose to sphaeropedunculate or ellipsoid, 45–75–100 (-120) × (20-) 35–57–87 (-115) µm, l/w = 1.04–1.38–1.68 (-2.38), with a smooth and thin wall, rarely slightly thickened (< 1 µm) [18/1/1].
Up to now, the species is only known from Tanzania and Madagascar. According to its ecology, it could potentially be observed in all regions occupied by the miombo woodland.
In miombo woodland (Tanzania) and in a garden, next to Cocos nucifera L., Citrus sp. (“combava”), Tambourissa sp. and Psidium guajava L., along the Indian Ocean (Madagascar).
This species is dedicated to Prof. Marja Härkönen in acknowledgment of her tremendous contribution to African mycology.
MADAGASCAR. Prov. Toamasina: Mahambo, Dec. 2014, P.Pirot s.n. (BR); Ibidem, 2016, P.Pirot s.n. (BR). – TANZANIA. Tabora District: ca. 10 km S of Tabora, Kipalapala, ca. 1200 m alt., 12 Dec. 1991, T.Saarimäki et al. 1061 (holotype: H!).
We believe that the picture of “Amanita cfr. phalloides” presented by
A comparison with the closely related species is given in the chapter “discussion” below.
RP-HPLC analyses of the specimen Degreef 1304 (holotypus of A. bweyeyensis) was made by two of us (EK & IA). The analysis showed the complete absence of α-, β- and γ-amanitin as well as that of phallacidin and phalloidin. The results were below the limit of detection (0.6 ng/g) for all the toxins in all the analysed samples: 3 samples with cuticle and 3 samples without cuticle.
It is interesting to mention that another specimen of A. bweyeyensis (Tiina Saarimäki et al. 591), collected in Tanzania, had been analysed previously, in the Technical Research Centre of Finland in Espoo, and that neither amatoxins nor phallotoxins had been found in that specimen either (Harkonen pers. comm.).
1 | Spores elongated, Q > 1.45. Slender species, ratio stipe length / pileus diameter > 1.5. Ring funnel-shaped on young basidiomata, not striated. Pileus margin often striated because of the thinness of the flesh | Amanita strophiolata [incl. var. bingensis] |
Pileus 50–60 mm diam., dirty white, often with a yellowish or greenish centre. The original description of var. bingensis mentions a pungent taste. Spores (7-) 7.5–10.0 (-10.5) × (4.0-) 5.0–6.5 (-7.0) µm, Q = 1.40–1.75. | ||
– | Spores less elongated, Q < 1.45. Less slender species, ratio stipe length / pileus diameter < 1.5. Ring never ascending, striated or not. Pileus margin not striated | 2 |
2 | Pileus greenish or olivaceous, sometimes yellowish-green or brownish-green, virgate (i.e. with fine darker radial stripes). Smell of old rose or rotten honey in age | Amanita phalloides |
Pileus 65–152 mm diam., ring striate. Spores 7.5–10.0 (-12.5) × (5.5-) 6.0–7.5 (-8.0) µm. | ||
– | Pileus whitish, greyish or pale brownish (sometimes olivaceous grey with a paler margin but then, strong smell of garlic), not virgate but sometimes radially marbled. Smell fungoid or different | 3 |
3 | Strong garlic smell, persisting several months in herbarium specimens. Spores subglobose, mean Q < 1.5 | Amanita alliiodora |
Pileus viscid, olivaceous grey, with a pallid margin, about 50 mm diam., ring striated. | ||
– | Smell fungoid or different. Spores subglobose or more elongated | 4 |
4 | Lamellae staining yellowish when bruised | Amanita thejoleuca |
Pileus 60–80 mm diam., pale yellowish-brown, darker in the centre. Ring rather fugacious, often missing on mature specimens. Spores 7–8 × 5–6 µm (original description), or 10–12 × 7.5–10 µm (after the spore drawings in Gilbert, 1941) | ||
– | Gills not yellowing when bruised | 5 |
5 | Pileus white at first, soon radially marbled by pale brownish or greyish streaks. Species mostly associated with various species of Eucalyptus, also mentioned once under Casuarina equisetifolia | Amanita marmorata |
Pileus 25–95 mm diam., ring striated. Spores (6.5-) 7.5–9.5 (-11.5) × (5.5-) 6.0–8.0 (-10.0) µm, Q = 1.05–1.40 | ||
– | Pileus not marbled, uniformly coloured or paler at margin, whitish to mouse grey or pale brownish. Species bound or not with Eucalyptus | 6 |
6 | Pileus mouse grey, dry. Ring striated | Amanita murinacea |
Pileus 70–80 mm diam. Spores 7.5–8.5 × 7–8 µm, mean Q = 1.15 | ||
– | Pileus whitish to pale brownish or greyish, often more or less viscid. Ring striated or not | 7 |
7 | Species growing under Eucalyptus. Bulb at stipe base +/- globose, neither pointed nor rooting. Ring striated. Smell sweetish, conspicuous | Amanita bweyeyensis |
– | Species not bound with Eucalyptus, found in Miombo woodland and in a garden. Bulb at stipe base turnip-shaped to rooting. Ring smooth or vaguely plicate. Smell weak resembling raw potato | Amanita harkoneniana |
The fact that A. bweyeyensis seems to grow always in association with Eucalyptus species (Myrtaceae), which are not indigenous in Africa, suggests that the fungus has been introduced with the trees. Such introductions are well known (see for example
Amanita marmorata Cleland & E.-J. Gilbert was described from New South Wales (Australia) (
Three new species of Phalloideae were recently found in Australia, namely Amanita djarilmari E.M.Davison and A. gardneri E.M.Davison from the south-west of Australia and A. millsii E.M.Davison & G.M.Gates from Tasmania (
Amanita capensis A. Pearson & Stephens is a nom. nud. which was published in
Amanita alliiodora Pat. is a very poorly known species, described from Madagascar by
Within the genus Amanita, the genes encoding amatoxins (α- and β-amanitin) and phallotoxins (phallacidin and phalloidin) were found so far to be present only in species that produce these compounds (
Very little is indeed known about the mechanisms behind the regulation of the fungal secondary metabolism. Many factors can play a key role in preventing the expression of phallacidin gene in these species. Several studies (
Amatoxins and phallotoxins are encoded by members of the “MSDIN” gene family and are synthesised on ribosomes as short (34- to 35-mer) pro-proteins, with conserved upstream and downstream sequences flanking a hypervariable region of 7 to 10 amino acids (
The genes of most secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways tend to be clustered and co-regulated in fungi (e.g. fumonisin biosynthesis in Fusarium). Many, but not all, clusters contain cluster-specific transcription factors that regulate expression of the biosynthetic genes for their respective metabolites, thus allowing for multiple regulatory layers giving the producing fungus precise spatial and temporal control over metabolite expression. A mutation in each key protein involved in the biosynthetic/regulatory pathway of phallotoxins production could result in an altered expression of the toxin. The evolutionary persistence of toxins productions in Amanita sect Phalloideae suggests that it should confer some selective advantage to the producing fungi. Since the lack of toxins could be the result of an alteration of the expression of these genes due to environmental and climatic conditions, in our opinion A. bweyeyensis and A. harkoneniana should be considered to have the potential to be deadly poisonous.
We thank the FONERWA (Rwanda’s Green Fund) which supported the inventory work of the edible fungi in the framework of the “Developing local mushroom strains to improve smallholder outgrower livelihoods and defend against National Park encroachment”, a project initiated in 2014 which allowed the discovery of these two Amanita species. We are also very grateful to Paul Pirot, who gave to the BR herbarium several specimens of Amanita harkoneniana he collected in Madagascar. We address our sincere thanks to the curators and members of the herbaria AD, H, K, MEL, PREM, PRU and VPI, for the information and the specimens they sent us on loan. We also thank Jilber Barutçiyan for initiating and facilitating contacts between the Belgian and Turkish authors of this article and Elaine Davison for useful suggestions to improve the text. We are grateful to Cyrille Gerstmans and Omer Van de Kerckhove for preparing the figures for publication.