Research Article
Research Article
Reinstatement of the corticioid genus Leifia (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) with a new species L. brevispora from Hubei, Central China
expand article infoShi-Liang Liu, Yusufjon Gafforov§|, Xian-Ying Zhang§, Hong-Ling Wang, Xue-Wei Wang§#, Li-Wei Zhou§
‡ Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
§ Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China
| Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
¶ Shenyang Institute of Technology, Fushun, China
# University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Open Access


The monotypic genus Leifia was previously considered to be a later synonym of Odonticium. With the morphological and phylogenetic evidence provided by an additional four East Asian specimens, we propose to reinstate Leifia as an independent genus in Hymenochaetales. Leifia morphologically differs from Odonticium by its grandinioid hymenophore with hyphal strands, numerous thick-walled cystidia with an invaginated apical end and narrowly and thick-walled basidia. The phylogeny generated from the current data set of ITS and 28S regions indicates that Leifia forms a sister clade to Odonticium. Besides the generic type Leifia flabelliradiata in the Leifia clade, two specimens, collected from Hubei, Central China, are newly introduced as Leifia brevispora. This new species is the second species of Leifia and differs from the generic type by its shorter basidiospores and distribution in warm-temperate to subtropical areas in East Asia. The additional two specimens, collected from Da Lat, Viet Nam, differ morphologically, both from each other and from known species of Leifia, but more samples need to be examined before further taxonomic decisions can be made.


Morphology, Odonticium, phylogeny, taxonomy, wood-inhabiting fungi, 1 new taxon


Leifia Ginns is a monotypic genus of wood-inhabiting basidiomycetes introduced by Ginns (1998). The basionym of its type is Phanerochaete flabelliradiata J. Erikss. & Hjortstam that was described from Norway (Eriksson et al. 1981). Burdsall (1985) regarded P. flabelliradiata as a deviating element in Phanerochaete P. Karst. and transferred it to Tubulicrinis Donk. Hjortstam (1986) accepted the concept of Phanerochaete sensu Burdsall (1985), but he considered that Tubulicrinis flabelliradiatus (J. Erikss. & Hjortstam) Burds. did not fit the concept of Tubulicrinis or any other known genus and thus erected a new genus Granulocystis Hjortstam to accommodate this species. Unfortunately, Granulocystis is an illegitimate later homonym for Granulocystis Hindák, a genus of green algae (Code of Nomenclature Art. 53.1, Turland 2018). Therefore, Ginns (1998) introduced Leifia replacing Granulocystis. By examining Russian specimens of Leifia flabelliradiata (J. Erikss. & Hjortstam) Ginns, Zmitrovich (2001) combined this species to Odonticium Parmasto as O. flabelliradiatum (J. Erikss. & Hjortstam) Zmitr. that is the currently accepted name of this species in MycoBank and Index Fungorum. Correspondingly, Leifia is treated as a synonym of Odonticium.

Till now, Larsson et al. (2006) is the single paper which includes the species Odonticium flabelliradiatum in a phylogenetic analysis. Although Odonticium flabelliradiatum grouped with O. romellii (S. Lundell) Parmasto, the generic type of Odonticium and two species of Repetobasidium J. Erikss. with a full Bayesian posterior probability (BPP) support in the Rickenella Raithelh. clade of Hymenochaetales, Larsson et al. (2006) considered that this clade might not be reliable due to the lack of morphological similarities and still used the name Leifia flabelliradiata rather than O. flabelliradiatum. However, no further taxonomic opinion relating to Leifia was provided in Larsson et al. (2006).

In 2017, four specimens close to Odonticium flabelliradiatum were collected from Central China and Vietnam, which draw our attention to the taxonomic status and diversity of Leifia. Based on morphological and molecular evidence, we propose the reinstatement of Leifia and reveal a higher diversity of this genus.

Materials and methods

Specimens studied are deposited in the herbarium of Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IFP). Morphological photos were taken with a digital camera Canon E12 (Tokyo, Japan) in the field. Morphological observations were made with Nikon SMZ 645 and SMZ 1000 stereomicroscopes and a Nikon Eclipse 80i light microscope (Tokyo, Japan) at magnifications up to 1000×. Microscopic procedures followed Hjortstam et al. (1987). Basidiocarp sections were prepared in Melzer’s reagent, lactic acid Cotton Blue (CB) and 3% potassium hydroxide (KOH). All microscopic measurements were made in CB. When presenting the variation of basidiospore sizes, 5% of the measurements were excluded from each end of the range and are given in parentheses. The following abbreviations are used in the text: L = mean basidiospore length (arithmetic average of all measured basidiospores), W = mean basidiospore width (arithmetic average of all measured basidiospores), Q = variation in the L/W ratios between the specimens studied, n (a/b) = number of spores (a) measured from given number (b) of specimens.

The four specimens newly collected were subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) directly with the Phire Plant Direct PCR kit (Finnzymes Oy, Espoo, Finland), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The nuc rDNA ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 (ITS barcode) and 28S regions were amplified using the primer pairs ITS1-F (Gardes and Bruns 1993) or ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990) and LR0R and LR7 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990), respectively. The PCR procedure was as follows: initial denaturation at 98°C for 5 min, followed by 39 cycles at 98 °C for 5 s, 59 °C for 5 s (ITS region)/48 °C for 5 s (28S region) and 72 °C for 5 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were sequenced at the Beijing Genomics Institute, China, with the same primers used for PCR. All newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).

The current dataset for phylogenetic analysis was mainly adopted from Larsson et al. (2006), where, to avoid redundance, taxa in the Rickenella clade including Leifia flabelliradiata were mostly referred to, while taxa in other clades were representatively selected (Table 1). Sistotrema brinkmannii (Bres.) J. Erikss. was selected as an outgroup taxon. Besides taxa in Hymenochaetales, Protodontia piceicola (Kühner ex Bourdot) G.W. Martin and Exidiopsis calcea (Pers.) K. Wells from Auriculariales were also included as additional ingroup taxa. The ITS and 28S datasets were separately aligned with MAFFT 7.110 (Katoh and Standley 2013) with the G-INI-I option (Katoh et al. 2005) and then the two resulting alignments were concatenated as a single alignment deposited in TreeBASE (study no. 23768). The best-fit evolutionary model for this concatenated alignment was estimated as GTR+I+G with jModel Test (Guindon and Gascuel 2003; Posada 2008). Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) methods were conducted to perform phylogenetic analysis, respectively, using raxmlGUI 1.2 (Silvestro and Michalak 2012; Stamatakis 2006) and MrBayes 3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012). In the ML analysis, bootstrap (BS) values were tested under the auto FC option (Pattengale et al. 2010). In the BI analysis, two independent runs were employed. Each run had four chains of 10 000 000 generations and started from random trees. Chain convergence was determined with Tracer 1.5 ( After sampling every 1000th generation, the first 25% of sampled trees was removed, whereas the other 75% was subjected to construction of a 50% majority consensus tree and calculation of BPPs. The ML and BI methods generated congruent topologies in main lineages. Therefore, the topology generated in the ML analysis is presented and the BS values and BPPs, simultaneously above 50% and 0.7, respectively, are shown at the nodes.

To further differentiate the taxa of Leifia, the distance matrix of the alignment of their ITS sequences (5.8S and ITS2 region) were estimated using MEGA5 (Tamura et al. 2011) under the parameters of maximum composite likelihood model, uniform rates amongst sites and pairwise deletion of gaps/missing data treatment.

Table 1.

Specimens used for the phylogenetic analyses.

Species a Voucher/strain number GenBank accession number Sequence reference Origin
Atheloderma mirabile TAA 169235 DQ873592 DQ873592 Larsson et al. (2006) Estonia
Basidioradulum radula AFTOL-ID 451 DQ234537 AY700184 Unpublished unknown
Blasiphalia pseudogrisella Lutzoni 930728-3 U66437 U66437 Lutzoni (1997) unknown
Coltricia perennis DSH 93-198 DQ234559 AF287854 Hibbett et al. (2000) unknown
Coniferiporia weirii JV 0407/8J KR350569 KR350557 Zhou et al. (2016) USA
Cylindrosporus flavidus Dai 13213 KP875564 KP875561 Zhou (2015) China
Cyphellostereum laeve JJ 020909 EU118621 EU118621 Larsson (2007a) Sweden
Exidiopsis calcea KHL 11075 AY463406 AY586654 Larsson et al. (2004) Sweden
Fomitiporella caryophylli CBS 448.76 AY558611 AY059021 Wagner and Fischer (2002); Jeong et al. (2005) India
Fomitiporia hartigii CBS 162.30 AY558621 AF311005 Jeong et al. (2005) Russia
Fulvifomes fastuosus CBS 213.36 AY558615 AY059057 Jeong et al. (2005) Philippines
Fulvoderma scaurum LWZ 20130909-2 MF860780 MF860731 Zhou et al. (2018a) China
Globulicium hiemale Hjm 19007 DQ873595 DQ873595 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Hymenochaete adusta CBS 759.91 AY558594 AF385161 Jeong et al. (2005) Unknown
Hyphoderma capitatum KHL 8464 (GB) DQ677491 DQ677491 Larsson (2007b) Sweden
Hyphoderma orphanellum NH 12208 (GB) DQ677500 DQ677500 Larsson (2007b) Russia
Hyphoderma sibiricum KHL 4141 (GB) DQ677503 DQ677503 Larsson (2007b) Sweden
Hyphodontia alutaria KHL 11889 DQ873603 DQ873603 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Hyphodontia arguta Hjm 18726 DQ873605 DQ873605 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Hyphodontia sp. H Berglund 1117 DQ873633 DQ873634 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Kneiffiella abieticola KHL 12498 DQ873601 DQ873601 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Kneiffiella barba-jovis KHL 11730 DQ873609 DQ873610 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Kneiffiella curvispora KHL DQ873615 DQ873616 Larsson et al. (2006) Finland
Kneiffiella floccosa Berglund 150-02 DQ873618 DQ873618 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Leifia brevispora LWZ 20170820-46 MK343469 MK343473 This study China
Leifia brevispora LWZ 20170820-48 MK343470 MK343474 This study China
Leifia flabelliradiata KG Nilsson 36270 DQ873635 DQ873635 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Leifiasp. 1 LWZ 20171015-36 MK343471 MK343475 This study Vietnam
Leifia sp. 2 LWZ 20171015-38 MK343472 MK343476 This study Vietnam
Loreleia marchantiae Lutzoni 930826-1 U66432 U66432 Lutzoni (1997) unknown
Lyomyces crustosus KHL 11731 DQ873614 DQ873614 Larsson et al. (2006) Finland
Lyomyces griseliniae KHL 12971 (GB) DQ873651 DQ873651 Larsson et al. (2006) Costa Rica
Lyomyces pruni Ryberg 021018 DQ873624 DQ873625 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Odonticium romellii 1 H 6059319 MF319073 MF318929 Korotkin (2017) Finland
Odonticium romellii 2 KHL s. n. DQ873639 DQ873639 Larsson et al. (2006) Norway
Palifer verecundus KHL 12261 (GB) DQ873642 DQ873643 Larsson et al. (2006) USA
Peniophorella praetermissum KHL 13164 (GB) DQ873597 DQ873597 Larsson et al. (2006) Estonia
Peniophorella puberum KHL 13154 (GB) DQ873599 DQ873599 Larsson et al. (2006) Estonia
Protodontia piceicola KHL 11763 (GB) DQ873660 DQ873660 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Repetobasidium conicum KHL 12338 DQ873647 DQ873647 Larsson et al. (2006) USA
Rickenella fibula 1 AD86033 AY463464 AY586710 Larsson et al. (2004) Sweden
Rickenella fibula 2 TENN 071482 MF319083 MF318943 Korotkin (2017) USA
Rickenella mellea Lamoure 74-20h 1/9.91 U66438 U66438 Lutzoni (1997) unknown
Rigidoporus corticola KHL 13217 (GB) DQ873641 DQ873641 Larsson et al. (2006) Estonia
Sidera lunata JS 15063 DQ873593 DQ873593 Larsson et al. (2006) Norway
Sistotrema brinkmannii KHL 14078 (GB) KF218967 KF218967 Larsson and Kotiranta (2013) Sweden
Skvortzovia furfuraceum KHL 11738 (GB) DQ873648 DQ873648 Larsson et al. (2006) Finland
Skvortzovia furfurella KHL 10180 (GB) DQ873649 DQ873649 Larsson et al. (2006) Puerto Rico
Skvortzovia georgica KHL 12019 (GB) DQ873645 DQ873645 Larsson et al. (2006) Norway
Skvortzovia pinicola KHL 12224 (GB) DQ873637 DQ873637 Larsson et al. (2006) USA
Sphaerobasidium minutum KHL 11714 DQ873652 DQ873653 Larsson et al. (2006) Finland
Sphagnomphalia revibasidiata Lutzoni 930826-1 U66441 U66441 Lutzoni (1997) unknown
Trichaptum abietinum NH 12842 (GB) AF347104 AF347104 Larsson et al. (2004) Finland
Tubulicrinis globisporus KHL 12133 DQ873655 DQ873655 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Tubulicrinis hirtellus KHL 11717 (GB) DQ873657 DQ873657 Larsson et al. (2004) Finland
Tubulicrinis inornatus KHL 11763 (GB) DQ873659 DQ873659 Larsson et al. (2004) Finland
Tubulicrinis subulatus KHL11079 AY463478 AY586722 Larsson et al. (2004) Sweden
Xylodon asperus KG Nilsson s. n. DQ873606 DQ873607 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Xylodon brevisetus KHL 12386 DQ873612 DQ873612 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Xylodon detriticus K.G. Nilsson 990902 DQ677507 DQ677507 Larsson (2007b) Sweden
Xylodon nespori B Nordon 030915 DQ873622 DQ873622 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden
Xylodon rimosissimus Ryberg 021031 (GB) DQ873627 DQ873628 Larsson et al. (2006) Sweden


From four studied specimens, four ITS and four 28S sequences were newly generated (Table 1). These sequences were incorporated in the dataset of Larsson et al. (2006) with an emphasis of taxa in the Rickenella clade. The current dataset included 62 taxa, each with an ITS and a 28S sequence. The concatenated alignment had 2426 characters. The BS search in the ML analysis stopped after 350 replicates. In the BI analysis, all chains were converged as suggested by the effective sample sizes of all parameters above 3300 and by the potential scale reduction factors close to 1000.

The current phylogeny (Figure 1) recovered Hymenochaetales as a strongly supported clade (94%, 1.00). Amongst Hymenochaetales, the Oxyporus (Bourdot & Galzin) Donk clade, the Kneiffiella P. Karst. clade, the Hyphodontia J. Erikss. clade and the Hymenochaetaceae clade were recovered like those in Larsson et al. (2006), although the latter two clades received no statistical support (Figure 1). The so-called Coltricia Gray clade in Larsson et al. (2006) here consisted entirely of corticioid species currently referred to Lyomyces P. Karst., Palifer Stalpers & P.K. Buchanan and Xylodon (Pers.) Gray, while Coltricia perennis (L.) Murrill nested within the Hymenochaetaceae clade (Figure 1). The Rickenella clade of Larsson et al. (2006), the focus group for this study, did not group together well, but Odonticium romellii and Leifia flabelliradiata formed a strongly supported clade (91%, 1.00; Figure 1) like that in Larsson et al. (2006). The four newly sequenced specimens, also in this clade, had a closer relationship with L. flabelliradiata (100%, 1.00; Figure 1) than with Odonticium. Besides the lack of morphological similarities between Odonticium and Leifia, the branch length separating Odonticium from Leifia and related taxa also indicated that the two genera should be treated as independent.

Figure 1. 

Phylogenetic relationship between Odonticium romellii and Leifia, based on the concatenated dataset of ITS and 28S regions. The topology was generated from the maximum likelihood analysis and the bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probability, simultaneously above 50% and 0.7, respectively, are shown at the nodes. The clade names are adapted from Larsson et al. (2006) and the species names from recent taxonomic proposals.

In the Leifia clade, four newly sequenced specimens formed two subclades: LWZ 20170820-46 and LWZ 20170820-48 (99%, 0.76) and LWZ 20171015-36 and LWZ 20171015-38 (58%, 0.86), which were both separated from L. flabelliradiata. The distance matrix of ITS sequences (Table 2) indicated that LWZ 20171015-36 and LWZ 20171015-38 represented two distinct lineages (4.4%), while LWZ 20170820-46 and LWZ 20170820-48 represented one lineage distinctly different from LWZ 20171015-36 (3.5%) and LWZ 20171015-38 (2.9%) and moderately from L. flabelliradiata (1.3%).

Table 2.

Distance matrix of the alignment of ITS sequences (5.8S and ITS2 region) from Leifia specimens.

Species 1 2 3 4 5
1 L. flabelliradiata
2 L. brevispora (LWZ 20170820-46) 0.013
3 L. brevispora (LWZ 20170820-48) 0.013 0.000
4 L. sp. (LWZ 20171015-36) 0.043 0.035 0.035
5 L. sp. (LWZ 20171015-38) 0.036 0.029 0.029 0.044


Leifia brevispora Gafforov, S.L. Liu & L.W. Zhou, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 829252
Figures 2 and 3


The species is distinct from Leifia flabelliradiata by shorter basidiospores and by being distributed in warm-temperate to subtropical areas in East Asia.


CHINA. Hubei Province, Wudangshan Town, Wudangshan National Forest Park, on fallen angiosperm branch, 20 Aug 2017, LWZ 20170820-46 (holotype in IFP 019239). GenBank: ITS = MK343469; 28S = MK343473.


brevispora (Latin), referring to short basidiospores.


Annual, resupinate, inseparable from substrate, effused, up to 0.6 mm thick. Hymenophore grandinioid to subodontioid. Margin white, smooth or minutely fibrous, sometimes bearing hyphal strands, thinning out, up to 2 mm wide. Aculei cream to buff in colour, rounded to ellipsoid, 2–3 per mm, up to 0.5 mm long, several being clustered together when dry. Subiculum white, up to 100 μm thick.

Microscopic structures

Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae without clamp connections. Subicular hyphae hyaline, thin- to thick-walled, occasionally branched, frequently septate, more or less parallel to substrate, 2–4 μm wide. Aculeus (subhymenial) hyphae hyaline, distinctly thick-walled, mainly vertically intertwined, 2–4 μm wide. Cystidia hyaline, thick-walled, tubular with an invaginated apical end, 60–100 × 5–7 μm, swelling in KOH. Basidia hyaline, thick-walled, clavate to cylindrical, with four sterigmata each 2–3 μm long and a simple septum at the base, 14–18 × 4.5–5.5 μm. Basidioles similar in shape to basidia, but smaller. Basidiospores ellipsoid, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, inamyloid and indextrinoid, acyanophilous, 3.8–4.5(–5) × (1.8–)2–2.5 μm, L = 4.13 μm, W = 2.14 μm, Q = 1.92–1.96 (60/2).

Other specimen examined

CHINA. Hubei Province, Wudangshan Town, Wudangshan National Forest Park, on fallen angiosperm branch, 20 Aug 2017, LWZ 20170820-48 (IFP 019240).


The grandinioid hymenophore, simple-septate hyphae, distinctly thick-walled cystidia with an invaginated apical end and ellipsoid to subovate basidiospores with a straight or concave side, indicate that the new species is the second member of Leifia. Moreover, the phylogeny inferred from the ITS and 28S dataset also confirm the taxonomic position of L. brevispora. The generic type of Leifia, L. flabelliradiata, differs from L. brevispora by having longer basidiospores (4.5–5.5 × 2–2.5 µm) and a distribution in Europe (Eriksson et al. 1981).

Figure 2. 

Basidiocarps of Leifia in situ. A-B. L. brevispora (LWZ 20170820-46, holotype). C-D. L. brevispora (LWZ 20170820-48, paratype). E-F. Leifia sp. (LWZ 20171015-36). G-I. Leifia sp. (LWZ 20171015-38). Scale bars: A, C, G: 5 cm; B, D−F, H−I: 1 cm.

Figure 3. 

Microscopic structures of Leifia brevispora (drawn from LWZ 20170820-46, holotype). A. basidiospores. B. basidia. C. basidioles. D. cystidia. E. subicular hyphae.


In this study, the newly generated ITS and 28S sequences were incorporated into the dataset of Larsson et al. (2006) and, in the resulting phylogeny (Figure 1), clades are labelled A-F as in Larsson et al. (2006). The differences of phylogeny observed between the current study and Larsson et al. (2006) might reflect that the ITS and 28S dataset itself is not enough to reliably resolve the relationships within Hymenochaetales. Similar to Larsson et al. (2006), Leifia formed a sister lineage to Odonticium with strong support in the current phylogeny (Figure 1). The five taxa of Leifia and the two of Odonticium were clearly separated and recovered as independent, fully supported clades. Morphologically, Leifia is well distinguished from Odonticium by its grandinioid hymenophore with hyphal strands, numerous thick-walled cystidia with an invaginated apical end and narrowly and thick-walled basidia (Eriksson et al. 1981). Therefore, we propose to resurrect Leifia as an independent genus in Hymenochaetales.

Amongst the four newly sequenced taxa in Leifia clade, LWZ 20170820-46 and LWZ 20170820-48 represent the new species L. brevispora, while LWZ 20171015-36 and LWZ 20171015-38, both collected from Bidoup Nui Ba National Park, Da Lat, Viet Nam, seem to represent two undescribed taxa. LWZ 20171015-36 differs from L. brevispora and L. flabelliradiata by fairly thick basidiocarps and LWZ 20171015-38 differs by having basidia and basidioles that swell in KOH. Moreover, LWZ 20171015-38 grows on fallen branches of Pinus, while the other three specimens were all collected from angiosperm substrates. Although the morphological characters of LWZ 20171015-36 and LWZ 20171015-38 are unique in Leifia, we feel more samples need to be examined before describing them as new species.


The research was financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 31570014 & 31770008), Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (No. 2017240) and Chinese Academy of Sciences President’s International Fellowship Initiative (Grant No. 2018VBB0021). We thank Dr. Barbara Wilson (Corvallis, Oregon, US) for suggestions on Latin name of species.


  • Burdsall Jr HH (1985) A contribution to the taxonomy of the genus Phanerochaete (Corticiaceae, Aphyllophorales). Mycologia Memoir 10: 1–165.
  • Eriksson J, Hjortstam K, Ryvarden L (1981) The Corticiaceae of North Europe 6. Fungiflora, Oslo, 1051–1276.
  • Hibbett DS, Gilbert LB, Donoghue MJ (2000) Evolutionary instability of ectomycorrhizal symbioses in basidiomycetes. Nature 407: 506–508.
  • Hjortstam K (1986) Notes on Corticiaceae (Basidiomycetes) XIV. Mycotaxon 25: 273–277.
  • Hjortstam K, Larsson KH, Ryvarden L (1987) The Corticiaceae of North Europe 1. Fungiflora, Oslo, 1–59.
  • Jeong WJ, Lim YW, Lee JS, Jung HS (2005) Phylogeny of Phellinus and related genera inferred from combined data of ITS and mitochondrial SSU rDNA sequences. Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology 15: 1028–1038.
  • Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Research 33: 511–518.
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780.
  • Korotkin HB (2017) Stable isotopes, phylogenetics, and experimental data indicate a unique nutritional mode for Rickenella fibula, a bryophyte-associate in the Hymenochaetales. MsD Theses, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 114 pp.
  • Larsson KH, Kotiranta H (2013) Sistotrema luteoviride sp. nov. (Cantharellales, Basidiomycota) from Finland. Acta Mycologica 48: 219–225.
  • Lutzoni FM (1997) Phylogeny of lichen- and non-lichen-forming omphalinoid mushrooms and the utility of testing for combinability among multiple data sets. Systematic Biology 46: 373–406.
  • Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A (2010) How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Journal of Computational Biology 17: 337–354.
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres D, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542.
  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetic analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739.
  • Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Kusber WH, Li DZ, Marhold K, May TW, McNeill J, Monro AM, Prado J, Price MJ, Smith GF (2018) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Vegetabile 159. Koeltz Botanical Books, Glashütten, 254 pp.
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246.
  • Wagner T, Fischer M (2002) Proceedings towards a natural classification of the worldwide taxa Phellinus s.l. and Inonotus s.l., and phylogenetic relationships of allied genera. Mycologia 94: 998–1016.
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (Eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and application. Academic Press, New York, 315–322.
  • Zhou LW, Ji XH, Vlasák J, Dai YC (2018) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Pyrrhoderma: a redefinition, the segregation of Fulvoderma gen. nov. and four new species. Mycologia 110: 872–889.
  • Zhou LW, Vlasák J, Dai YC (2016) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Phellinidium (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota): a redefinition and the segregation of Coniferiporia gen. nov. for forest pathogens. Fungal Biology 120: 988–1001.
  • Zmitrovich IV (2001) Contribution to the taxonomy of corticoid fungi. I. The genera Athelia, Byssomerulius, Hyphoderma, Odonticium. Mikologiya I Fitopatologiya 35: 9–19.
login to comment