Print
A new species of Lecidea (Lecanorales, Ascomycota) from Pakistan
expand article infoMemoona Khan, Abdul Nasir Khalid, H. Thorsten Lumbsch§
‡ University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
§ The Field Museum, Chicago, United States of America
Open Access

Abstract

We describe here a new species, Lecidea aptrootii, in Lecidea sensu stricto from Swat Valley, Pakistan. It is most similar to L. fuscoatra in having an areolate thallus and black, lecideine apothecia with a persistent margin. However, L. aptrootii can be readily distinguished by having smaller ascospores (average length 8-10 µm). In phylogenetic analyses, using ITS and nuLSU rDNA sequences, L. aptrootii forms a sister-group relationship to L. grisella, which differs in having a rimose thallus.

Keywords

Asia, Lecideaceae, lichenised fungi, new species, taxonomy

Introduction

Pakistan is a country with a broad altitudinal range from sea level at the Arabian Sea to the second highest point of the world (K-2) at 8,611 m (Khan 1991). This variation in altitude is associated with diverse ecosystems, constituting 18 distinct ecoregions (IUCN 2006). Consequently, the lichen flora of this region is expected to be rich but so far largely unknown due to lack of detailed surveys (Aptroot and Iqbal 2012). Swat is the focal point of the Hindu Kush Himalayan region of Pakistan and its lichen flora is currently being studied by the first author (MK). The area is primarily montane and spreads over 8220 km2 of land with altitudinal variation ranging from 600 m in the south to more than 6000 m in northern high peaks (Ahmad et al. 2015). The known lichen flora of Swat represents roughly 26% of the total lichen flora of the country but almost all reports are from small localities and easily approachable picnic spots (Aptroot and Iqbal 2012). In our studies of the lichen flora of this region, an interesting, crustose lichen of the genus Lecidea was found.

The genus Lecidea Ach. (Lecideaceae) that was originally described by Acharius (1803), underwent many systematic changes and its traditional wide circumscription (Zahlbruckner 1926) dramatically changed over the last decades (Hafellner 1984; Hertel 1967, 1977, 2006). Of the 427 species included in Lecidea sensu lato (Kirk et al. 2008), only about 100 belong to Lecidea sensu stricto based on, amongst other characters, the presence of a Lecidea-type ascus (Hertel 2006). The taxonomy of Lecidea species is complex because of the morphological variation within and amongst species. The species circumscription in Lecidea needs revision and molecular data are helpful in interpreting subtle morphological differences that have been considered as intraspecific variability (Schmull et al. 2011). From Pakistan, so far five Lecidea spp. have been reported, viz. L. atrobrunnea (Ram.) Schaer., L. atroviridis (Arnold) Th.Fr., L. bohlinii H. Magn, L. portensis Nádv. and L. tessellata Flörke (Aptroot and Iqbal 2012). The new record of a saxicolous lichen in the Swat district adds a sixth species of the genus. Below, this species is described morphologically and chemically and molecular evidence identified that it represents a new taxon in Lecidea sensu stricto.

Material and methods

Morphological and chemical studies

Collections were made in August 2016 during a mycological survey of Gabin Jabba and Malam Jabba (Swat Valley) where altitude varies from 600 m to 2500 m. These areas have a moist temperate climate and remain under snow cover during winter while the summer season is accompanied by a significant amount of rainfall. Standard microscopy and spot tests (Hale 1979) were used for identification. Measurements were made from free-hand sections mounted in water. Amyloid reactions were tested with Lugol’s solution with and without pretreatment with 10% KOH. High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) was performed using solvent C following standard methods (Arup et al. 1993, Lumbsch 2002, Orange et al. 2001).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

We used apothecia to extract DNA with Fungal/Bacterial DNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research Corp., Irvine, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Molecular data were generated for two loci: the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the nuclear large subunit (nuLSU) ribosomal DNA. The primer pair ITS1F (Gardes and Bruns 1993) and ITS4 (White et al. 1990) were used to amplify the ITS region; and primer pair AL2R (Mangold et al. 2008) and LR6 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990) were used to amplify the nuLSU region. Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed in 12.5 µl volume per reaction using MyTaqTM Red Mix (Bioline International, Toronto, Canada). PCR protocol for the ITS region consisted of initial denaturation of 5 min at 94 °C, 40 cycles of 30 sec at 94 °C, 30 sec at 48 °C, 1.5 min at 72 °C and a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. PCR protocol for LSU consisted of initial denaturation of 75 sec at 94.5 °C, 35 cycles of 35 sec at 95 °C, 55 sec at 55 °C, 42 sec at 72 °C and a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. PCR products were visualised on 1% agarose gel and cleaned using Exo SAP-IT (USB, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Cycle sequencing reactions were performed using BigDye Terminator v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with the same primers as used for the PCR amplification. The sequencing reactions were run on an ABI 3730 48-capillary electrophoresis DNA analyser sequencer according to established protocols (Applied Biosystems) at the Pritzker Laboratory for Molecular Systematics at the Field Museum, Chicago, IL, USA.

Phylogenetic analyses

The ITS locus for two specimens and nuLSU gene for one specimen were successfully amplified and sequenced. Sequences of other Lecidea spp. based on initial BLAST searches and those used in a recent study on Lecidea by McCune et al. (2017) were used in phylogenetic analyses (Table 1). Bellemerea cinereorufescens (Ach.) Clauzade & Roux was used as the outgroup. Multiple sequence alignments for each individual locus were performed using programme MAFFT v7 with all parameters set to default values (Kotah and Standley 2013). The ends of alignments were trimmed to nearly an equal number of sites for all sequences. All gaps were treated as missing data. ITS and nuLSU sequences were concatenated in Bioedit v7.2.5 (Hall 1999) using the append file option. Maximum likelihood analyses were performed via CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al. 2010) employing RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE (Stamatakis 2014). For bootstrapping, the GTRCAT model was selected. One thousand rapid bootstrap replicates were run. Two molecular analyses (one with ITS and another with combined ITS & nuLSU rDNA) were performed since only a limited amount of nuLSU data were available, whereas a larger number of ITS sequences, available in GenBank, allow for in-depth inference of the phylogenetic position of the new species.

GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in phylogenetic analyses.

Species ITS nuLSU
Bellemerea cinereorufescens KY800500 -
Lecidea andersonii 1 EU257685 -
Lecidea andersonii 2 EU257683 -
Lecidea andersonii 3 EU257684 -
Lecidea aptrootii 1 Gabin Jabba (GB-1) MH618901 -
Lecidea aptrootii 2 Malam Jabba (MJ-3) MH594348 MH594349
Lecidea atrobrunnea 1 EU259897 HQ660535
Lecidea atrobrunnea 2 EU259898 AY532993
Lecidea cancriformis 1 EU357674 -
Lecidea cancriformis 2 EU257671 -
Lecidea cancriformis 3 EU257672 -
Lecidea fuscoatra 1 HQ605929 HQ660541
Lecidea fuscoatra 2 HQ605926 AY756339
Lecidea fuscoatra var grisella 1 HQ605931 HQ660542
Lecidea fuscoatra var grisella 2 HQ605928 -
Lecidea laboriosa 1 EU259902 KJ766586
Lecidea laboriosa 2 EU259901 DQ986882

Results and discussion

Taxonomy

Lecidea aptrootii M. Khan, A.N. Khalid, H. T. Lumbsch, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 825562
Figures 3, 4

Type

PAKISTAN. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Swat district, Gabin Jabba valley, 1600 m alt., 37.1706°N, 72.3711°E, 18 Aug 2016, AN Khalid, GB-1 (Holotype LAH-35505).

Diagnosis

Saxicolous, thallus irregularly areolate, apothecia epruinose, lecideine with persistent margin, asci with tholus, I+ blue, ascospores simple, ellipsoid with average size of 8–10 × 4.5–5.5 µm.

Description

Thallus crustose, irregularly areolate, subcontiguous; prothallus usually indistinct, black when present; areoles flat, up to 1.2 mm in diameter and 300 µm thick, uniformity in colour from centre to edge; surface rough, not shiny, greenish-grey to light brown; Cortex not clearly differentiated, up to 31.5 μm in thickness; medulla I-, medullary hyphae thin walled, compactly arranged, 2.4–3.2 µm in diameter; photobiont layer up to 63 µm thick, algal cells 12.8–14.4 µm; apothecia black, round to irregular in outline, up to 1.5 mm in diameter, lecideine, epruinose with slightly raised, black, thin and persistent margin, frequently present, disc black, flat to slightly convex, proper exciple thin, dark brown to black; epihymenium light brown to dark brown, 8–16 µm; hymenium hyaline to olivaceous brown, (60)-70–98 µm tall; subhymenium light brown to dark brown, Hypothecium darkly pigmented throughout, Asci clavate with distinct tholus, the tip I+ blue, 8-spored, 50–68 × 12.30–16.70 µm; Ascospores simple, ellipsoid, (7)8–10(11) × (4)4.5–5.5(6) µm; paraphyses branched and net-like, 1.6–2.4 µm wide, not expanded at tips; vegetative propagules and conidiomata not seen.

Chemistry

Thallus K-, KC+, C+ Red, P-, UV-. Gyrophoric acid, schizopeltic acid and 2’-O-methylperlatolic acid were detected with HPTLC.

Distribution and ecology

The species is so far only known from two collections in the Swat district in Pakistan, where the species occurs on exposed siliceous rocks between 1600 and 1900 m altitude.

Etymology

The epithet “aptrootii” refers to the lichenologist André Aptroot who has contributed to the knowledge of lichen diversity in Pakistan (e.g. Aptroot and Iqbal 2012) and has indicated to the first author that the material from Pakistan might represent an undescribed species.

Notes

Lecidea aptrootii belongs to Lecidea sensu stricto (Hertel 2006). The new species is a member of Lecidea subgen. Lecidea, according to the generic sub-classification as suggested by Rambold (1989). In the field, it looks like L. fuscoatra with an areolate thallus and black apothecia. A microscopic study revealed it differs from that species in having smaller ascospores. Another similar species in the complex is L. grisella, which, however, is readily distinguished by having a rimose rather than areolate thallus (Aptroot and Van Herk 2007). Recently, Lecidea grisella has been reported from China, which might belong to L. aptrootii and has ascospores 8-12(13) µm in length (Zhao et al. 2017) that overlap with an average spore length for L. aptrootii i.e. 8-10 µm. Additional studies are necessary to determine whether the Chinese material belongs to L. aptrootii or represents an additional lineage in this complex. Molecular data in Lecidea are helpful to interpret morphological features previously considered as intraspecific variation (Schmull 2011).

The areoles of L. fuscoatra have a differentiated black or grey margin, in contrast to the black cortex, whereas in L. aptrootii, the margins of areoles are concolorous with the areoles. This is a common feature of L. aptrootii and the recently described L. uniformis from North America (McCune et al. 2017). However, the two species differ in the branching of paraphyses and presence of tholus in the asci. Further, molecular data support that they represent distinct lineages (Figs 12).

Figure 1. 

Most likely phylogenetic relationship of Lecidea aptrootii and associated taxa inferred with ITS data based on rooting with Bellemerea cinereorufescens as outgroup. Branch lengths are based on the estimated number of substitutions per site.

Figure 2. 

Phylogenetic relationships of Lecidea aptrootii and associated taxa inferred from ITS & nuLSU rDNA data under maximum likelihood. Bellemerea cinereorufescens was used as outgroup. Bootstrap values indicated at nodes.

In addition, L. oreophila K. Knudsen & Kocourk. with irregularly areolate thallus, light to dark grey upper surface and epruinose apothecia, might be confused with L. aptrootii but the former has apothecia that are usually higher than areoles and rarely branched paraphyses with expanded apices up to 5 µm (Knudsen and Kocourková 2014).

Molecular analyses of ITS and two ribosomal loci (ITS & nuLSU) dataset (605 and 1433 unambiguously aligned positions in ITS and two loci dataset, respectively) support the fact that the Pakistan collections are phylogenetically distinct from the morphologically similar L. fuscoatra and L. uniformis (Figs 12). In fact, the morphologically different L. grisella forms a well-supported sister-group relationship with L. aptrootii.

Additional specimen examined

Pakistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Swat district, Malam Jabba valley, 1900 m alt., on rock, 20 Aug 2016, AN Khalid, MJ-3 (LAH-35506).

Figure 3. 

Lecidea aptrootii in natural habitat.

Figure 4. 

Lecidea aptrootii. Thallus and apothecia of the holotype.

Acknowledgements

The first author is thankful to the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (HEC) for providing support for her research at The Field Museum of Chicago under the IRSIP programme. We are grateful to Dr. André Aptroot for his help with the identification of Lecidea samples. We acknowledge Dr. Alejandrina Barcenas-Peña for her help in HPTLC and Dr. Bruce McCune for providing us sequences used in his recent work.

References

  • Acharius E (1803) Methodus Qua Omnis Detectos Lichenes. Stockholm, 393 pp.
  • Ahmad H, Öztürk M, Ahmad W, Khan SM (2015) Status of Natural Resources in the Upland of the Swat Valley, Pakistan. In: Öztürk M, Hakeem KR, Faridah-Hanum I, Efe R (Eds) Climate Change Impacts on High Altitude Ecosystems. Springer International Publishing, 49–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12859-7_2
  • Aptroot A, Van Herk CM (2007) Lecidea grisella sympatric with Lecidea fuscoatra, differing in its rimose instead of areolate thallus. Lichenologist 39: 293–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282907006706
  • Arup U, Ekman S, Lindblom L, Mattsson J-E (1993) High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC), an improved technique for screening lichen substances. Lichenologist 25: 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282993000076
  • Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes-application to the identification of Botryosphaeria and associated anamorphic fungi. Mycological Research 105: 1033–1044.
  • Hafellner J (1984) Studien in Richtung einer natürlicheren Gliederung der Sammelfamilien Lecanoraceae und Lecideaceae. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 79: 241–371.
  • Hale ME (1979) How to Know Lichens (2nd еdn). William C. Brown Company Publishers.
  • Hall TA (1999) Bioedit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic acid symposium series 41: 95–98.
  • Hertel H (1967) Revision einiger calciphiler Formenkreise der Flechtengattung Lecidea. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 24: 1–155.
  • Hertel H (1977) Gesteinsbewohnende Arten der Sammelgattung Lecidea (Lichenes) aus Zentral-, Ost-und Südasien. Khumbu Himal 6: 145–378.
  • Hertel H (2006) World distribution of species of Lecidea (Lecanorales) occurring in central Europe. In: Guttova A, Lackovicova A, Lisicke E, Lizon P (Eds) Central European Lichens: Diversity and Threat. Mycotaxon Ltd., 19–74.
  • IUCN [International Union of Conservation for Nature] (2006) News release: Pakistan’s rich biodiversity faces serious threats. http://www.iucn.org.neral
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvement in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Khan FK (1991) A Geography of Pakistan: Environment, People and Economy. Oxford University Press.
  • Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA (2008) Dictionary of the Fungi (10th edn). CAB International, Wallingford, 771 pp.
  • Knudsen K, Kocourková J (2014) A new species of Lecidea (Lecideaceae, Lichenized Ascomycetes) from the mountains of California. Opuscula Philolichenum 13: 80–83.
  • Lumbsch HT (2002) Analysis of phenolic products in lichens for identification and taxonomy. In: Kranner I, Beckett R, Varma A (Eds) Protocols in Lichenology Culturing, Biochemistry, Ecophysiology and Use in Biomonitoring. Springer, Berlin, 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56359-1_17
  • Orange A, James PW, White FJ (2001) Microchemical methods for the identification of lichens. British Lichen Society, London. 1–101.
  • Rambold G (1989) A monograph of the saxicolous lecideoid lichens of Australia (excl. Tasmania) Bibliotheca Lichenologica 34: 345.
  • Schmull M, Miadlikowska J, Pelzer M, Stocker-Wörgötter E, Kukwa M, Lumbsch HT, Kauff F, Lutzoni F (2011) Phylogenetic affiliations of members of the heterogenous lichen forming fungi of the genus Lecidea sensu Zahlbruckner (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota). Mycologia 103: 983–1003. https://doi.org/10.3852/10-234
  • Smith CW, Aptroot A, Coppins BJ, Fletcher A, Gilbert OL, James PW, Wolseley PA (Eds) (2009) The Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland. Natural History Museum Publications, in association with The British Lichen Society.
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direst sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis N, Gelfand D, Sninsky J, White T (Eds) PCR Protocols: A Guide to the Methods and Applications. Academic Press, 315–322.
  • Zahlbruckner A (1926) Lichenes. In: Engler A, Prantl KA (Eds) Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilicn (2nd edn), 8. Borntraeger, 61–270.