Research Article |
Corresponding author: Md. Iqbal Hosen ( iqbalpatho@gmail.com ) Academic editor: María P. Martín
© 2018 Md. Iqbal Hosen, Tahir Mehmood, Kanad Das, Linas V. Kudzma, R. P. Bhatt.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Hosen MI, Mehmood T, Das K, Kudzma LV, Bhatt RP (2018) Amanita tullossiana, a new species, and two new records of Amanita section Lepidella from north-western Himalaya, India. MycoKeys 37: 73-92. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.37.26420
|
Amanita tullossiana, a new species of Amanita [subgenus Lepidella] section Lepidella from India is described. The species is characterised by its ash grey to brownish-grey pileus covered with dark grey to greyish-black universal veil remnants, the upper part of its rooting stipe base covered by several rows of recurved scales, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospores, absence of basidial clamp connections and pileal remnants of universal veil comprising abundant, disordered inflated cells intermixed with scattered filamentous hyphae. Molecular phylogenetic analysis and morphology both support the association of A. tullossiana with species of Bas’ stirps Cinereoconia – A. cinereoconia and A. griseoverrucosa. Two species, A. griseoverrucosa and A. virgineoides are reported here as new records for India.
Amanitaceae , Basidiomycota , nrLSU, South Asian taxa, taxonomy
This article is dedicated to Dr. Rodham E. Tulloss for his contribution to mycology especially in the family Amanitaceae.
The Amanitaceae is one of the most dominant and species-rich families of Basidiomycota. Traditionally, this family is divided into three genera, namely Amanita Pers., Limacella Earle and Catatrama Franco-Mol. However, a recent study by
The Amanitaceae is characterised by longitudinally acrophysalidic stipe tissue. The agaricoid species in the genus Amanita are characterised by their schizohymenial development, which is evidence in mature basidiomata by their sterile lamella margin (
The genus Amanita is divided into two subgenera: a) Amanita Pers. and b) Lepidella (E.-J. Gilbert) Veselý based on the reaction of basidiospore walls to Melzer’s reagent, the former having a negative reaction (inamyloid) and the latter having a positive reaction (amyloid) to that reagent (
Species within Amanita sect. Lepidella are recognised by the combination of the following features: non-striate and appendiculate pileus margin and a volva that is friable, not forming an entire membranous sac (with the rare exception of a thin submembranous or membranous exterior layer). Approximately 200 taxa are listed for this section in the Amanitaceae website (http://www.amanitaceae.org/), of which 185 have been validly published (
During the course of macrofungal forays into different parts of the state of Uttarakhand, India, the second author (TM) collected several specimens of Amanita in broad-leaved forests. Morphological examination and molecular data indicated that the new collections herein reported represent one species new to science and two new records for India.
Macromorphological characteristics were documented in the forest or base camp from fresh and dissected young to mature basidiomata. Photography was accomplished using a digital camera (Sony cyber-shot W730 and Cannon Power Shot SX 50). Colour codes follow
Micromorphological characteristics were observed with a compound microscope (Olympus CH20i) with dried material mounted in 5% KOH, 1% Phloxin, Melzer’s reagent and 1% Congo red. To present basidiospore measurements, the following notation was used: “[n/m/p]” indicating n basidiospores were measured from m basidiomata of p collections with a minimum of 20 basidiospores from each collection. Biometric variables followed those in
DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from dry basidiomata following the modified CTAB method of
In this study, a dataset of 49 nrLSU sequences of Amanita subg. Lepidella and one nrLSU sequence of Limacella bangladeshana Iqbal Hosen were used for phylogenetic analysis. The nrLSU sequences of Amanitaceae were selected based on BLASTn search results (
In this study, five sequences (three for nrLSU and two for rpb2) were generated from three separate collections (RET 717-4, RET 717-9 and TM 16-1228) of Amanita and deposited in GenBank (Table
Name of the species | Herbarium voucher/collection/collector number | Geographic location | GenBank accession number | |
---|---|---|---|---|
nrLSU | rpb2 | |||
Amanita afrospinosa | RET 347-1 | Zimbabwe | HQ539666 | – |
Amanita afrospinosa | RET 347-1 | Zimbabwe | HQ539666 | – |
Amanita amanitoides | RET 344-9 | Zambia | HQ539668 | – |
Amanita amerivirosa | RET 628-2 | USA | KY924826 | – |
Amanita sp. | TM 16-1247 | India | MF375478 | – |
Amanita armillariiformis | DAOM216919 | USA | AF261436 | – |
Amanita atkinsoniana | RET 301-1 | USA | HQ539670 | – |
Amanita brunnescens | BW_HP12 | USA | HQ539674 | – |
Amanita cinereoconia | BW_PSF | USA | HQ593118 | – |
Amanita cinereopannosa | RET 319-8 | USA | HQ539678 | – |
Amanita cinereovelata | HKAS 81647* | Bangladesh | KP259291 | – |
Amanita cokeri | BW-STF 090506-19 | USA | HQ539682 | – |
Amanita conicoverrucosa | – | – | AY194983 | – |
Amanita costaricensis | RET 330-4 | Costa Rica | KP258990 | – |
Amanita daucipes | RET 386-8 | USA | HQ539688 | – |
Amanita eriophora | RET 350-4 | Cambodia | HQ539672 | – |
Amanita excelsa | Ge 816 | China | HQ539691 | – |
Amanita fritillaria | HKAS 29511 | China | AF024452 | – |
Amanita fuliginea | HKAS 32521 | China | AF024454 | – |
Amanita grallipes | RET 379-5 | Brazil | HQ539700 | – |
Amanita griseoverrucosa | HKAS 38459 | China | AY436495 | – |
Amanita griseoverrucosa | TM 16-1228 | India | MF359828 | – |
Amanita heishidingensis | HKAS 76122* | China | KC429045 | – |
Amanita japonica | HMAS 59778 | China | AF024460 | – |
Amanita kotohiraensis | MHHNU 6998 | China | FJ011681 | – |
Amanita lavendula | RET 339-7 | Canada | KR865979 | – |
Amanita longipes | RET 360-1 | USA | HQ539704 | – |
Amanita magniverrucata | RET 594-10 | USA | KR919774 | – |
Amanita macrocarpa | 31939L | China | KC408378 | – |
Amanita nauseosa | DPL 6117 | USA | HQ539715 | – |
Amanita ochrophylla | PSC1127 | Australia | HQ539715 | – |
Amanita onusta | RET 297-3 | USA | HQ539718 | – |
Amanita peckiana | RET 320-3 | USA | HQ539720 | – |
Amanita phalloides | Ben Woo (WTU) | USA | AY380359 | – |
Amanita proxima | RET 290-10 | France | HQ539728 | – |
Amanita polypyramis | BW_CC | USA | HQ593122 | – |
Amanita rufobrunnescens | GDGM 42374* | China | KT865210 | – |
Amanita sepiacea | HKAS 38716 | China | AY436501 | – |
Amanita smithiana | RET 382-6 | USA | HQ539740 | – |
Amanita solitaria | RET 298-1 | France | HQ539741 | – |
Amanita subjunquillea | HKAS 24169 | China | AF024479 | – |
Amanita tephrea | RET 378-9 | USA | HQ539751 | – |
Amanita tullossiana | RET 717-4* | India | MF945577 | MH638335 # |
Amanita vestita | HKAS 77277 | China | KC429044 | – |
Amanita virgineoides | RET 717-9 | India | MF945578 | MH638336 # |
Amanita virgineoides | HKAS 79691 | China | KJ466495 | – |
Amanita virgineoides | HKAS 77278 | China | KC429043 | – |
Amanita virgineoides | HKAS 18394 | China | AF024484 | – |
Amanita virosa | RET 291-3 | USA | KY924846 | – |
Limacella bangladeshana | Iqbal-276* | Bangladesh | KR816668 | – |
Phylogenetic relationships of Amanita tullossiana, A. griseoverrucosa and A. virgineoides inferred from nrLSU sequences using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method. Bootstrap support values (≥50%) obtained from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis are shown above or beneath the branches at nodes. Amanita tullossiana, A. virgineoides and A. griseoverrucosa from India are highlighted in bold on the tree. GenBank accession numbers are provided after each species name and followed by country of origin.
INDIA, Uttarakhand, Rudhraparyag district, Baniyakund, at 2655 m a.s.l., 30°28.998N, 79°10.658E, 26 August 2014, T. Mehmood, TM 14-475 (RET 717-4, holotype; CAL 1611, isotype).
The epithet “tullossiana” (Lat., “of Tulloss”) is proposed in honour of Dr. Rodham E. Tulloss for his contribution to the study of the genus Amanita all over the world.
Distinct from all the known species of Amanita stirps Cinereoconia by the combination of the following characters: medium-sized to large basidiomata (pileus 90–170 mm wide, stipe 150–185 × 20–25 mm); brownish-grey to dark grey pileus covered with floccose to subfelted, pulverulent patches of universal veil remnants; broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospores measuring (8.5–)9–13(–13.5) × (5.8–)6–8(–8.5) µm.
Basidiomata medium-sized to large. Pileus 90–170 mm wide, initially hemispherical then convex to plano-convex and finally planar, shiny, slightly viscid when moist, ash grey (1B2), pastel grey (1C1), grey (4B1-4C1), brownish-grey, brownish-beige (6F2-3) to dark grey (1F1), slightly darker at centre; context 11–14 mm thick above stipe, white (1A1), thinning evenly toward margin, unchanging when cut or bruised. Universal veil on pileus as floccose to subfelted pulverulent patches, dark grey (1F1) to brownish-grey (6F2), greyish-black to dark grey (1F1), soft, up to 4 mm thick, 7–12 mm wide, irregularly distributed. Lamellae 6–10 mm broad, free to narrowly adnate, crowded, white (1A1), unchanging when injured; lamellulae, plentiful of several lengths, attenuate, truncate, with 8–9 lamellae per cm at margin. Stipe 150–185 × 20–25 mm (excluding bulb), attenuate upwards, upper part covered by dark grey (1F1) fibrils, lower part covered with recurved scales, with fibrils turn blackish when handled; context solid, white, unchanging on cutting or bruising. Partial veil superior, soft, cottony, white, easily collapsed or detachable. Bulb 70–88 × 25–41 mm, napiform to rooting, covered with brownish-grey (6F2) to dark grey (1F1) universal veil remnants, often upper part covered with grey (4B1) to dark grey (1F1) recurving scales. Odour indistinct, taste not observed. Spore deposit white.
Basidiospores [300/15/10] (8.5–)9–13(–13.5) × (5.8–)6–8(–8.5) µm, [L = 9.5–11 µm, L' = 10.54 µm; W = 6–7.5 µm, W' = 6.83 µm; Q = (1.29–)1.40–1.66(–1.83), Q = 1.38–1.59, Q' = 1.54], broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, amyloid; contents monoguttulate; apiculus lateral to sublateral, up to 1 µm long. Basidia 45–55(–65) × 9–14 µm, 2 to 4-spored, thin-walled; sterigmata up to 4 µm long; basal clamp connections absent. Lamellar edge tissue sterile, mainly composed of inflated globose to subglobose cells 20–35 × 15–25 µm and clavate to subclavate cells 40–50 × 15–18 µm. Subhymenium 40–50 μm thick, with 3–4 layers of inflated cells, wst-near = 35–50 μm, wst-far= 50–70 μm, basidia arising from small inflated cells 8–15 × 6–10 μm wide. Hymenophoral trama bilateral, divergent; wcs= 60–80 μm; well rehydrated, filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 3–8 μm wide; with lateral stratum composed of intercalary inflated cells 66–110 × 12–19 μm wide; vascular hyphae 9–14 μm. Pileipellis 140–195 μm thick, in two layers, with gelatinised colourless suprapellis (45–55 μm) thick, filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae subradially arranged; subpellis (95–140 μm) thick; filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 2–6 μm wide, densely arranged in subpellis, with yellowish-brown intracellular pigment; vascular hyphae 7–10 μm wide, infrequent. Pileus context filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 2–6 μm wide, thin-walled, hyaline, interwoven; broadly clavate to ellipsoid cells 86–130 × 26–45 μm, thin-walled, hyaline. Universal veil on pileus disordered; filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 2–6 μm wide, branched, thin-walled, infrequent to scattered, with pale yellow vacuolar pigments; inflated cells dominantly globose to subglobose 25–88 × 22–70 µm, infrequent broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid or pyriform 40–60 × 10–13 μm, often in chains of 2–3, with brownish to pale yellow vacuolar pigments; vascular hyphae 6–12 μm wide, frequent. Universal veil on stipe base disordered; filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 2–5 μm wide, branched, thin-walled, scattered, with pale yellow vacuolar pigments; inflated cells dominantly globose to subglobose 30–70 × 25–65 µm, infrequent broadly ellipsoid to elongated cells 30–90 × 12–18 μm, with brownish to pale yellow vacuolar pigments; vascular hyphae 10–14 μm wide, often present. Partial veil abundant inflated cells broadly clavate to clavate 50–120 × 16– 29 µm, thin-walled, colourless, hyaline, sometimes with yellowish-brown vacuolar pigments; filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 3–7 µm wide, dominant, thin walled, hyaline, colourless or sometimes with yellowish-brown pigments; vascular hyphae 4–8 μm wide. Stipe context longitudinally acrophysalidic; filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 5–7 µm wide; acrophysalides 150–230 × 35–56 µm, thin-walled, colourless, hyaline, vascular hyphae not found. Clamp connections not observed in any tissues.
5% KOH - negative on pileus, 2% phenol - negative and FeSO4 crystals - negative on pileus and in stipe context.
Solitary to subgregarious in temperate mixed forest dominated by Quercus semicarpifolia and Abies pindrow, at 2350–2655 m a.s.l. Currently only known from India.
INDIA, Uttarakhand, Rudraparyag district, Baniyakund, 26 August 2014, T. Mehmood, TM 14-486 (GUH-M-27001); same location, 14 July 2015, T. Mehmood, TM 15-624 (GUH-M-27002); same location, 1 August 2015, T. Mehmood, TM 15-786 (GUH-M-27003); same location, 2 August 2015, T. Mehmood, TM 15-815 (GUH-M-27004); same location, 8 August 2015, T. Mehmood, TM 15-891 (GUH-M-27005); same location, 30 August 2015, T. Mehmood, TM 15-1017 (GUH-M-27006); same location, 22 July 2016, T. Mehmood, TM 16-1123 (GUH-M-27007); same location, 26 August 2016, T. Mehmood, TM 16-1369 (GUH-M-27008); Nainital district, Mukteshwar 24 August 2016, T. Mehmood, TM 16-1338 (GUH-M-27009).
The grey to brownish-grey universal veil, the absence of clamp connections, disordered inflated cells intermixed with scattered filamentous hyphae, together with broadly ellipsoid to cylindrical basidiospores are the key features of sect. Lepidella stirps Cinereoconia (
In stirps Cinereoconia, A. griseofarinosa Hongo, A. lutescens Hongo, A. pelioma Bas, A. odorata Beeli, A. vestita Corner & Bas, A. griseovelata D.A. Reid, A. pallidoflavescens Dav. T. Jenkins and A. viridissima Wartchow are all species that should be compared to the morphology of the present taxon. Amanita griseofarinosa, originally described from Japan, has a pale yellowish-grey pileus covered with dark coloured, farinose to tomentose universal veil remnants; and subglobose to broadly ellipsoid basidiospores 8.5–10 × 7–9 μm, with a lower Q' value = 1.2 (
Amanita cinereopannosa, A. cinereoconia and A. griseoverrucosa are the phylogenetically closely related species to the new species (Fig.
Basidiomata medium-sized to large. Pileus 60–125 mm wide, initially hemispherical then convex to plano-convex, dry, slightly viscid when moist, whitish to greyish-white (1B1) to ash grey (1B2) to grey (1D1); context 6–11 mm thick, white (1A1), thinning evenly towards margin, unchanging when cut or bruised. Universal veil on pileus as felted to subconical to verrucose, brownish-grey (1D3), greyish-brown (5F3) to dark grey (1F1), soft, up to 4 mm thick, 5–8 mm wide, irregularly distributed; margin non-striate, appendiculate; Lamellae free to narrowly adnate, crowded, white (1A1), unchanging, 6–10 mm broad; lamellulae attenuate, plentiful, of several lengths, with 7–8 lamellae per cm at margin. Stipe 45–90 × 12–21 mm (excluding bulb), narrowing upwards, solid, lower part covered by light grey (1D1) fibrillose squamules, upper part covered by white farinose squamules; context white, unchanging on cutting or bruising. Bulb 32–62 × 19–32 mm, ventricose to clavate, white, covered with grey (1D1) to dark grey (1F1), universal veil remnants. Partial veil superior, soft, cottony, white, easily collapsed. Odour indistinct, taste not observed. Spore deposit white.
Basidiospores [80/4/2] (8–) 8.5–10(–11) × (5.5–)6 –6.5 (–7) µm, [L =9.05–9.17 µm, L' = 9.11 µm; W = 5.9–6.5 µm, W' = 6.2 µm; Q = (1.32–)1.42–1.5(–1.69), Q = 1.51–1.54, Q' = 1.53], ellipsoid, hyaline, thin walled, smooth, amyloid, apiculus sublateral, up to 1 µm. Basidia (34–)45–50(–53) × (9.5–)10–12(–14) µm, 2 to 4-spored, thin-walled, colourless, hyaline; sterigmata up to 4 µm long; basal clamp connections not observed in any tissue after extensive search. Lamellae edge sterile; composed of clavate or pyriform inflated cells 35–50 × 22–31 μm, thin walled, colourless, hyaline. Subhymenium 35–40 μm thick, wst-near = 30–40 μm, wst-far = 40–55 μm, basidia arising from subglobose to broadly ellipsoid cells (11–18 × 8–15 μm). Hymenophoral trama bilateral, divergent; wcs = 40–60 μm; well rehydrated, filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 3–8 μm wide; inflated cells ellipsoid to elongated 55–90 × 12–19 μm, diverging at an angle of approximately 40°; vascular hyphae 11–14 μm wide, infrequent. Pileipellis 130–150 μm thick, subradially to densely arranged, filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 2–7 μm wide; vascular hyphae 7–10 μm wide, infrequent. Universal veil on pileus disordered; filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 2–7 μm wide, scattered, branched, thin walled; inflated cells dominantly globose to subglobose 40–70 × 30–65 µm, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid 40–60 × 10–13 μm, often in chain of 2–3 cells, thin walled, hyaline, often with yellowish-brown vascular pigment. Universal veil on base of stipe disordered; filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 3–8 μm wide, scattered, thin walled, branched, with brownish vacuolar pigments; inflated cells dominantly globose to subglobose 30–65 × 26–58 µm, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid or pyriform 26–55 × 8–13 μm, thin-walled, hyaline, with brownish vacuolar pigment. Partial veil abundant inflated cells clavate to broadly clavate 76–130 × 13–25 µm, thin walled, colourless, hyaline or brownish vacuolar pigments; filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 3–5 µm wide. Stipe context longitudinally acrophysalidic, filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 5–7 µm wide; acrophysalides 220–270 × 33–45 µm, filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 4–8 µm wide, hyaline, vascular hyphae not found. Clamp connections not observed in any tissue.
Solitary to gregarious, with plants of Fagaceae, Pinaceae and Ericaceae (Rhododendron arboretum).
Currently known from China (
INDIA, Uttarakhand, Pauri district, Phedkhal, at 1900 m a.s.l., 30°09.728'N, 078°51.206'E, 29 July 2016, T. Mehmood, TM 16-1228 (GUH-M-27010); same location, 26 August 2015, T. Mehmood, TM-15-971 (GUH-M-27011), 1910 m a.s.l., 30°09.732'N, 078°51.214'E.
Morphologically, the Indian collections of A. griseoverrucosa are characterised by a whitish to greyish-white pileus covered with easily detachable greyish-brown to dark grey, felted to verrucose universal veil remnants, a ventricose to clavate stipe base, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospores, universal veil on the pileus with abundant inflated cells and scattered filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae and the absence of clamp connections at bases of basidia. The characteristic features and molecular data from the Indian collections match rather well with the original description of A. griseoverrucosa, reported from China (
The absence of clamp connections at the bases of basidia, ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid basidiospores and abundant inflated cells with scattered hyphae in the universal veil placed this species in Amanita [sect. Lepidella subsect. Solitariae] stirps Cinereoconia (
Basidiomata medium-sized to large. Pileus 50–140 mm wide, white to slightly yellowish-white (1A2) with age, ovoid at first, hemispherical when expanding, later convex to plano-convex to flat; slightly depressed, dry, shiny, densely covered with conical to subconcal warts; margin appendiculate, incurved; context 8–13 mm thick, thinning evenly towards margin, white, turning yellowish-white (1A2) when cut or bruised. Universal veil on pileus as conical, subconic to pyramidal warts, 5–10 mm thick, white, easily detachable when touched, sometimes washed away by rains, turning slightly yellowish-white (1A2) with age. Lamellae 12–15 mm thick, free, white (17A1) crowded, with 8–9 lamellae per cm at margin; lamellulae attenuate, of 4–5 lengths, plentiful, white to cream. Stipe 75–140 × 26–22 mm (excluding bulb), white (16A1), slightly tapering upwards, the upper part covered by flocculent squamules, the lower part covered by irregularly arranged, conical to sub-conical warts; context white, solid, turning light yellowish (1A3) when cut or bruised. Bulb 23–29 × 23–30 mm, subglobose, ovoid to napiform, white, slightly yellowish-white with age. Universal veil on stipe base as white conical to subconical warts. Partial veil superior, white, submembranous, thick, covered with white conical warts, fragile, easily detachable when touched. Odour unpleasant. Taste not recorded. Spore print white.
Basidiospores [180/9/4] (7.5–)8–10.5(–11) × (5.5–)5.8–7.5 µm, [L = 8–10 µm, L' = 9.05 µm; W = 6.0–6.7 µm, W' = 6.45 µm; Q = (1.22–)1.33–1.55(–1.66), Q = 1.33–1.46, Q' = 1.41], colourless, hyaline, thin walled, smooth, amyloid, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid; apiculus lateral to sublateral, up to 1 µm long; contents monoguttulate. Basidia (42–)48–51(–58) × (10–)11–12(–12.5) µm, 2 to 4-spored, thin-walled, colourless, hyaline; sterigmata up to 4 µm long; basal septa often clamped. Lamellar edge tissue sterile, with inflated cells; subglobose to pyriform 15–25 × 8–15) μm, thin walled, colourless, hyaline, clamps present. Subhymenium 30 µm thick, wst-near = 28–45 μm, wst-far= 35–50 μm, ramose, with inflated; ovoid to ellipsoid cells 12–18 × 8–14 μm; clamp present. Hymenophoral trama, bilateral, divergent; wcs= 40–65 μm; lateral stratum comprising of inflated intercalary segment 30–65 × 8–20 μm, common; filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 3–9 μm wide, thin-walled, colourless, hyaline, vascular hyphae rare; clamp present. Pileipellis hardly differentiated; filamentous hyphae 2–7 μm wide, interwoven, non-gelatinised, thin walled, colourless, hyaline. Universal veil on the pileus with elements anticlinally arranged; filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 4–8 μm wide, abundant, branched, colourless, hyaline; inflated cells dominantly subglobose to pyriform 16–46 × 14–32 μm, broadly ellipsoid to fusiform 30–66 × 10–21 μm; clamp present. Universal veil on the stipe base with elements anticlinally arranged; filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 4–7 µm wide, scattered to abundant, colourless, thin walled, hyaline; inflated cells dominantly globose to subglobose 20–50 × 18– 48 µm, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid 45–65 × 15–20 µm, thin walled, hyaline, colourless, clamps present. Partial veil abundant inflated cells subglobose to ellipsoid 15–36 × 12–28 μm, thin walled, colourless, hyaline; filamentous, undifferentiated hyphae 3–8 µm wide, dominant, colourless, thin walled, clamps present. Stipe context longitudinally acrophysalidic; filamentous hyphae 2–13 μm wide, acrophysalides measuring 120 –181 × 20–30 μm, dominant, colourless, thin walled, hyaline, clamps present. Clamp connections common.
Chemical reactions on pileus surface: 10% NH4OH - pinkish, 5% KOH - negative, 2% phenol - negative; and FeSO4 crystals - negative on pileus and stipe context.
Solitary to subgregarious in temperate mixed forest dominated by Quercus leucotrichophora and Cedrus deodara at 1850–2050 m a.s.l.
Known distribution: This species was originally described from Japan. It has also been reported from China (
INDIA, Uttarakhand, Pauri district, Phedkhal, 24 August 2014, T. Mehmood, TM 14-413 (RET 717-9); same location, 12 August 2015, T. Mehmood, TM 15-917 (GUH-M-27012); same location, 16 July 2016, T. Mehmood, TM 16-1098 (GUH-M-27013); same location, 24 July 2017, T. Mehmood, TM 17-1468 (GUH-M-27014).
An Indian collection (RET 717-9) is grouped phylogenetically with Chinese material of A. virgineoides (HKAS 79691, GenBank nrLSU: KJ466495 and HKAS 77278, GenBank nrLSU: KC429043), with pairwise genetic divergence between their nrLSU sequences = 0.35% (might be intragenomic heterogeneity present amongst collections as the sequence was not clean). It is worth mentioning that there is no genetic distance between rpb2 sequences derived from the Chinese (HKAS 79691, GenBank rpb2: KJ466663) and Indian (RET 717-9) collections. The evidence suggests that the two collections could be conspecific and exhibiting a minor intra-specific variability. In addition, the sample size is also small. For these reasons, we do not feel justified in erecting a new species or subspecies. Interestingly, another Chinese collection (HKAS 18394), labelled as A. virgineoides (GenBank nrLSU: AF024484,
Amanita virgineoides belongs to Amanita [sect. Lepidella subsect. Solitariae] stirps Virgineoides because of the presence of conical to subconical warts on the pileus surface which consist of inflated cells rather abundant hyphae, the presence of clamp connections at the bases of basidia and the broadly ellipsoid basidiospores (
The authors are very grateful to Dr. Rodham E. Tulloss (USA) for his providing valuable comments on versions of this manuscript and his giving consent to propose the new species name in his honour; and to the Head, Department of Botany and Microbiology, H.N.B Garhwal University (Srinagar, Garhwal, India) for providing many facilities during the present study. The second author (TM) acknowledges the University Grants Commission (UGC, India) for providing a PhD fellowship. The third author (KD) is thankful to the Director, Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata for supporting this study. Field assistance rendered by Miss Priyanka Uniyal, Mr. Upendra Singh, Mr. Aniket Ghosh and Mr. M.E. Hembrom are also acknowledged. This study was partially supported by the NSFC Research Fund for International Young Scientists (No. 31750110476) and 11th Special Fund of the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2018T110854) to the first author (MIH) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31470155).