Research Article
Print
Research Article
Phylogenetic diversity of Colletotrichum species (Sordariomycetes, Glomerellales, Glomerellaceae) associated with plant diseases in Thailand
expand article infoDeecksha Gomdola§|, Rajesh Jeewon#, Eric H.C. McKenzie¤, Ruvishika S. Jayawardena, Fatimah Al-Otibi#, Xia Tang, Yong Wang§, Kevin D. Hyde#, Li Fu|
‡ Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand
§ Guizhou University, Guiyang, China
| Shandong Institute of Pomology, Shandong, China
¶ University of Mauritius, Réduit, Mauritius
# King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
¤ Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand
Open Access

Abstract

Colletotrichum is a cosmopolitan fungal genus, and its species are known for their important role as plant pathogens. They also occur as endophytes and saprobes. The genus comprises species complexes, many of which include cryptic species that are morphologically similar but phylogenetically distinct. Colletotrichum is characterized by globose to subglobose ascomata and acervular conidiomata and hyaline, aseptate ascospores and conidia, although a few species produce septate ascospores. Ascospores are typically cylindrical, oval, or fusiform, while conidia are mostly ellipsoidal to ovoid. Many Colletotrichum species also produce appressoria, which are formed at the tips of germ tubes or directly from the mycelium. In this study, we collected diseased leaves and pods with spots, blight, and blotches from Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, and Tak provinces in Thailand. For species identification and delimitation, we employed a biphasic approach incorporating morphological data and multigene phylogenetic analyses of the locus of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS, nuclear rDNA consisting of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) and the genes encoding for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), chitin synthase 1 (CHS1), actin (ACT), beta-tubulin 2 (TUB2), histone (H3), and calmodulin (CAM). We obtained 20 Colletotrichum isolates representing eight species, among which we propose two new species: Colletotrichum dendrobii (from Dendrobium sp.) and C. musichiangmaiense (from Musa sp.). We also establish 13 new host records (for six species): C. castaneae (on Jasminum grandiflorum), C. chrysophilum (on Terminalia sp.), C. endophyticum (on Artocarpus heterophyllus, Begonia luxurians, Cassia sp., Castanopsis sp., Ficus auriculata, and Schefflera sp.), C. fructicola (on Castanea sp., Hedychium sp., and Rhododendron sp.), C. jiangxiense (on Artocarpus sp.), and C. schimae (on Jasminum sp.). In addition, this is the first study to present the sexual morph of C. endophyticum.

Key words:

2 novel species, 13 new host records, asexual, plant pathogens, sexual, species complexes, taxonomy

Introduction

Colletotrichum was introduced by Corda (1831) and typified with C. lineola. It is the sole genus in Glomerellaceae (Glomerellales, Sordariomycetes, Ascomycetes, Fungi) (Jayawardena et al. 2021a; Hyde et al. 2024a). Its sexual morph was formerly classified under Glomerella (Marin-Felix et al. 2017), which is characterized by globose to subglobose, dark brown to black, ostiolate ascomata; unitunicate and cylindrical asci; and hyaline, aseptate ascospores that are smooth-walled, cylindrical to oval or fusiform with acute and/or rounded ends, although a few species, such as C. gigasporum and C. taiwanense, produce septate ascospores. Its asexual morph is characterized by acervular conidiomata, hyaline to pale brown conidiophores that are branched or unbranched, enteroblastic, hyaline to pale brown conidiogenous cells that are cylindrical to ellipsoidal or ampulliform, and hyaline, aseptate, smooth-walled, ellipsoidal to ovoid conidia that are straight or slightly flexuous, with some species producing curved, falcate, or lunate conidia, with a rounded or acute apex, and rounded or truncate base. Setae and appressoria may be present, with appressoria produced from germ tubes or directly from the mycelium (Damm et al. 2009; Jayawardena et al. 2016a, 2021a; Marin-Felix et al. 2017; Bhunjun et al. 2021; Liu et al. 2022).

Colletotrichum has a cosmopolitan distribution with a wide host range, colonizing a myriad of plants and displaying remarkable adaptability to different environments (Jayawardena et al. 2016a, 2020, 2021a, 2022; Armand et al. 2023; Talhinhas and Baroncelli 2023; Yang et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2023a, 2023b; Aumentado et al. 2024; Hyde et al. 2024b; Sui et al. 2024). Colletotrichum species are predominantly pathogens, typically exhibiting a necrotrophic phase and, in some cases, a short biotrophic stage (O’Connell et al. 2012). Plant diseases caused by Colletotrichum taxa include anthracnose (sunken necrotic spots), spots, blights and blotches of leaves and fruits, as well as stem rot and dieback (Than et al. 2008a, b; Jayawardena et al. 2016a, 2021a; Marin-Felix et al. 2017). Some species can infect insects (Wynns et al. 2019; De Vivo et al. 2021) and humans (Hung et al. 2020; Paniz-Mondolfi et al. 2021). Besides being notorious pathogens, they are endophytes, epiphytes, and saprobes (Jayawardena et al. 2021a).

There are over 1000 epithets in Index Fungorum (2025), but only about 350 species are fully described with molecular data (Jayawardena et al. 2021a; Talhinhas and Baroncelli 2023). Based on the current classification system, they are distributed across 15 species complexes, with about 20 singleton species, that is, species not assigned to any complex (Bhunjun et al. 2021; Talhinhas and Baroncelli 2021, 2023; Sui et al. 2024). The species complexes are C. acutatum, C. agaves, C. bambusicola, C. boninense, C. dematium, C. destructivum, C. dracaenophilum, C. gigasporum, C. gloeosporioides, C. graminicola-caudatum, C. magnum, C. orbiculare, C. orchidearum, C. spaethianum, and C. truncatum (Jayawardena et al. 2021a; Talhinhas and Baroncelli 2023; Aumentado et al. 2024). The C. caudatum species complex is grouped within the C. graminicola species complex instead of forming a larger distinct clade (Marin-Felix et al. 2017; Jayawardena et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2022). Thus, Bhunjun et al. (2021) proposed combining the two complexes as the C. graminicola-caudatum species complex (Sui et al. 2024).

In this study, 20 Colletotrichum isolates representing eight species were obtained from diseased leaves and pods collected in Thailand. Detailed morphological examinations were conducted, and their taxonomic placement was confirmed using phylogenetic analyses based on concatenated gene trees incorporating the locus of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS, nuclear rDNA consisting of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) and the genes encoding for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), chitin synthase 1 (CHS1), actin (ACT), beta-tubulin 2 (TUB2), histone (H3), and calmodulin (CAM). Two new species are proposed: Colletotrichum dendrobii, associated with pod blight of Dendrobium sp. and placed in the C. spaethianum species complex, and C. musichiangmaiense, a singleton species associated with leaf blight of Musa sp. Additionally, 13 new host records are established for six species: C. castaneae, C. chrysophilum, C. endophyticum, C. fructicola, C. jiangxiense, and C. schimae. The sexual morph of C. endophyticum is herein reported for the first time. Furthermore, an updated phylogenetic tree is provided, incorporating all Colletotrichum taxa with DNA sequence data across species complexes, alongside a revised count of species distributed within each complex and the number of singleton species.

This research enhances the understanding of plant pathogens that impact crop yield and food security through the development of accurate fungal diagnostics to support sustainable agriculture and by improving knowledge of plant-fungal interactions, biodiversity, and ecosystem health.

Materials and methods

Sample collection, examination, and material deposition

Diseased leaves and pods displaying symptoms such as spots, blight, and blotches were collected from Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, and Tak Provinces in Thailand. Specimens were stored in plastic bags and brought to the laboratory for further examination. Micro- and macro-morphological characteristics were examined with a Motic SMZ 168 Series stereomicroscope. Single spore and tissue isolation techniques following the guidelines outlined in Senanayake et al. (2020) were used to isolate the fungi observed. Single spores and individual hyphal tips were transferred aseptically to fresh potato dextrose agar (PDA; 39 g/L) and malt extract agar plates (MEA; 50 g/L). Pure cultures were incubated at 25 °C, and sporulated cultures were observed after 28 d. Images were captured using a Canon 750D camera (Canon, Tokyo, Japan) affixed to a Nikon ECLIPSE E600 compound microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Photo plates were constructed with Adobe Photoshop CS6 version 2020 (Adobe Systems, USA), and measurements for each feature were obtained using Tarosoft® Image Frame Work (version 0.97).

Dried cultures are stored in the Mae Fah Luang University Herbarium (MFLU), and living cultures are deposited in the Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC), Thailand. FacesofFungi numbers (FoF) for isolates that previously lacked one are provided here (Jayasiri et al. 2015), and Index Fungorum (IF) numbers are assigned to the novel species (Index Fungorum, 2025). The descriptions, illustrations, and phylogenetic trees have been updated in the GMS microfungi database (https://gmsmicrofungi.org/) (Chaiwan et al. 2021).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from axenic cultures using the BIOMIGA Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (San Diego, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocols. Seven gene regions, the locus of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS, nuclear rDNA consisting of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2), and the genes encoding for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), chitin synthase 1 (CHS1), actin (ACT), beta-tubulin 2 (TUB2), histone (H3), and calmodulin (CAM) were amplified and sequenced to identify the Colletotrichum isolates at the species level. The following primer pairs were used: ITS1/ITS4 for ITS (White et al. 1990), GDF1/GDR1 for GAPDH (Guerber et al. 2003), CHS-79F/CHS-345R for CHS1 (Carbone and Kohn 1999), ACT-512F/ACT-783R for act (Carbone and Kohn 1999), T1/Bt2b for TUB2 (Glass and Donaldson 1995), CYLH3F/CYLH3R for H3 (Liu et al. 2022), and CL1C/CL2C for CAM (Weir et al. 2012).

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) mixture was prepared to a final volume of 20 µL, which included 10 µL of PCR master mix, 1 µL each of forward and reverse primers (10 µM stock concentration), 7 µL of double-distilled water, and 1 µL of template DNA. The PCR program consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 45 s, annealing at 55 °C for 50 s for ITS, 52 °C for 1 min for GAPDH and ACT, and 58 °C for 1 min and 30 s for CHS1, TUB2, CAM, and H3, with an extension step at 72 °C for 2 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Purification and sequencing of the PCR amplicons for the forward and reverse directions were performed by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., China.

Phylogenetic analysis

The quality of sequences was verified using DNA Baser Assembler, and unreadable bases at each end were trimmed manually. Sequences were subjected to BLAST searches in NCBI, and sequence data of other species were retrieved from GenBank (Suppl. material 1). Consensus sequences were obtained using SeqMan (DNAStar, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). Individual gene datasets were aligned using MAFFT version 7 with default settings (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) (Katoh et al. 2019) and trimmed using trimAl (Capella-Gutiérrez et al. 2009). The trimmed datasets were combined using SequenceMatrix (Vaidya et al. 2011). Four phylogenetic trees were generated based on four different datasets. Dataset 1 included a broader taxon sampling, encompassing all Colletotrichum species across all species complexes. The remaining datasets focused on specific species complexes, given that we recovered isolates that belong to those complexes. Dataset 2 included all species from the C. gloeosporioides species complex, dataset 3 included all species from the C. spaethianum species complex, and dataset 4 included all species from the C. acutatum species complex.

Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis was performed in the IQ-TREE web server (https://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at) by applying the default parameters and 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates (Nguyen et al. 2015). Bayesian inference (BI) was conducted using MrBayes on XSEDE (version 3.2.7a) in the online CIPRES Science Gateway version 3.3 (https://www.phylo.org/portal2) (Huelsenbeck et al. 2001; Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003; Miller et al. 2010). Nucleotide substitution models generated automatically in the ML log file were selected as the best-fit models based on the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and are as follows: GTR+F+I+G4 for ITS, TIM3e+I+G4 for GAPDH, TIMe+I+G4 for CHS1, HKY+F+I+G4 for ACT, TNe+I+G4 for TUB2, TN+F+I+G4 for H3, and TIM+F+I+G4 for CAM. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling was applied to obtain posterior probabilities (PP). Four Markov chains with trees being sampled every 1000 generations were simultaneously run for 50,000,000, 80,000,000, 25,000,000, and 55,000,000 generations for trees 1 to 4, respectively. A burn-in of 20% was implemented, with the remaining 80% used to calculate the PP of the consensus trees.

The alignments are deposited in Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28377707). Phylogenetic trees were visualized in FigTree version 1.4.4 (Rambaut and Drummond 2014) and edited using Microsoft PowerPoint (version 2016), Inkspace version 1.2.2 (Harrington 2005), and the tvBOT web application (Xie et al. 2023).

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

Dataset 1 consisted of 2920 characters (ITS = 1–524, GAPDH = 525–777, CHS1 = 778–1059, ACT = 1060–1315, TUB2 = 1316–1813, H3 = 1814–2189, and CAM = 2190–2920). Dataset 2 consisted of 3137 characters (ITS = 1–534, GAPDH = 535–797, CHS1 = 798–1087, ACT = 1088–1354, TUB2 = 1355–2022, H3 = 2023–2406, and CAM = 2407–3137). Dataset 3 consisted of 2920 characters (ITS = 1–519, GAPDH = 520–773, CHS1 = 774–1024, ACT = 1025–1261, TUB2 = 1262–1751, H3 = 1752–2122, and CAM = 2123–2920). Dataset 4 consisted of 2981 characters (ITS = 1–538, GAPDH = 539–788, CHS1 = 789–1070, ACT = 1071–1316, TUB2 = 1317–1806, H3 = 1807–2190, and CAM = 2191–2981). The log-likelihood of the consensus trees was -83865.668, -18946.853, -7997.184, and -11551.837 for trees 1–4, respectively (Figs 14).

Figure 1. 

Maximum likelihood analysis (IQ-tree) based on a combined dataset of ITS, GAPDH, CHS1, ACT, TUB2, H3, and CAM sequences from dataset 1, which includes all Colletotrichum species. Bootstrap support values (ML ≥ 80%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP ≥ 0.95) are given above the branches or near the nodes as ML/PP. Hyphens (--) indicate bootstrap support values below 80% for ML and posterior probabilities below 0.95. The tree is rooted with Monilochaetes infuscans (CBS 869.96) and M. melastomae (CBS145059). Type, ex-type, and reference species are denoted with T. Our isolates are in bold red font, while our new species are in bold blue font. Different color blocks represent distinct species complexes, with a single color used to denote singleton species.

Figure 2. 

Maximum likelihood analysis (IQ-tree) based on a combined dataset of ITS, GAPDH, CHS1, ACT, TUB2, H3, and CAM sequences from dataset 2, which includes all species in the C. gloeosporioides species complex. Bootstrap support values (ML ≥ 80%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP ≥ 0.95) are given above the branches or near the nodes as ML/PP. Hyphens (--) indicate bootstrap support values below 80% for ML and posterior probabilities below 0.95. The tree is rooted with C. beeveri (CBS 128527) and C. boninense (CBS 123755), belonging to the C. boninense species complex. Type, ex-type, and reference species are denoted with T. Our isolates are in bold red font. Different color blocks represent distinct species complexes.

Figure 3. 

Maximum likelihood analysis (IQ-tree) based on a combined dataset of ITS, GAPDH, CHS1, ACT, TUB2, H3, and CAM sequences from dataset 3, which includes all species in the C. spaethianum species complex. Bootstrap support values (ML ≥ 80%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP ≥ 0.95) are given above the branches or near the nodes as ML/PP. Hyphens (--) indicate bootstrap support values below 80% for ML and posterior probabilities below 0.95. The tree is rooted with C. luanense (CNUCC 157A-4-4 and CNUCC 157A-4-4-2), belonging to the C. destructivum species complex. Type, ex-type, and reference species are denoted with T. Our new species are in bold blue font. Different color blocks represent distinct species complexes.

Figure 4. 

Maximum likelihood analysis (IQ-tree) based on a combined dataset of ITS, GAPDH, CHS1, ACT, TUB2, H3, and CAM sequences from dataset 4, which includes all species in the Colletotrichum acutatum species complex. Bootstrap support values (ML ≥ 80%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP ≥ 0.95) are given above the branches or near the nodes as ML/PP. Hyphens (--) indicate bootstrap support values below 80% for ML and posterior probabilities below 0.95. The tree is rooted with C. dematium (CBS 125.25) and C. parthenocissicola (MFLUCC 17-1098), belonging to the C. dematium species complex. Type, ex-type, and reference species are denoted with T. Our isolates are in bold red font. Different color blocks represent distinct species complexes.

Taxonomy

Colletotrichum acutatum species complex

Colletotrichum schimae F. Liu, W.P. Wu & L. Cai, in Liu et al. Stud. Mycol. 101:38 (2022)

Figs 4, 5

Description.

Associated with leaf spots of Jasminum sp. Leaf spots circular, pale brown to brown. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 200–1000 µm diam. (x̄ = 400 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered or segregated, globose to subglobose, dark brown to black, exuding glistening yellowish to orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores formed directly from mycelium, hyaline, sometimes septate. Conidiogenous cells 16–45 × 2–4.5 µm (x̄ = 32 × 3.5 µm, n = 10), formed terminally or laterally on hyphae, hyaline, cylindrical, solitary or branched, straight or flexuous, tapering towards the apex. Conidia 9–15 × 2.5–4 µm (x̄ = 11.5 × 3.5 µm, n = 30; L/W ratio = 3.3), hyaline, cylindrical to fusiform, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, mostly with acute ends. Appressoria not observed.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 40 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 °C; mycelium initially white, becoming yellowish to olivaceous brown with age; elevation flat, with an entire margin.

Specimens examined.

Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Doi Inthanon National Park, Kew Mae Pan nature trail, associated with leaf spots of Jasminum sp. (Oleaceae), 20 Oct 2021, D. Gomdola DGJas1(L2)-A (MFLU 25-0001, BHH 50476), living culture MFLUCC 25-0002; DGJas1(L3)-B (MFLU 25-0002, BHH 50478), living culture MFLUCC 25-0003.

Figure 5. 

Colletotrichum schimae. a. Leaf spots (Jasminum sp.); b. Top and reverse of colony on PDA after 7 d; c. Conidiogenesis and developing conidia; d–i. Conidia. Scale bars: 10 μm. The scale bar (i) applies to d–h.

GenBank accession numbers.

MFLUCC 25-0002; ITS = PV263289; GAPDH = PV290895; CHS1 = PV274246; ACT = PV297872; and TUB2 = PV295615; MFLUCC 25-0003; ITS = PV263290; GAPDH = PV290896; CHS1 = PV274247; ACT = PV297873; and TUB2 = PV295616.

Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles.

Endophytic on Schima sp. in China (Liu et al. 2022).

Pathogenic on leaves of Camellia sinensis var. assamica and Ilex chinensis in China (Sui et al. 2024).

Associated with leaf spots of Jasminum sp. in Thailand (this study).

Notes.

Our isolates (MFLUCC 25-0002 and MFLUCC 25-0003) grouped with Colletotrichum schimae (LC13880, LC13881, PC9, CNUCC 324C-1-5-2, and CNUCC 528-2-2) with 97% ML and 0.98 PP support (Fig. 4). In our phylogenetic analyses, C. schimae is positioned within the C. acutatum species complex (Figs 1, 4), consistent with the findings of Liu et al. (2022) and Sui et al. (2024). Nucleotide sequence comparisons between our two isolates and C. schimae (LC13880) showed no differences in ITS (494 base pairs, bp), GAPDH (215 bp), and TUB2 (490 bp) regions. However, a 0.8% sequence divergence (2/245 bp) was observed in the CHS1 gene between our isolates and the ex-type of C. schimae (LC13880). For ACT, no differences were found between MFLUCC 25-0002 and C. schimae (LC13880), but a 1.9% divergence (4/208 bp) was observed between MFLUCC 25-0003 and C. schimae (LC13880).

MFLUCC 25-0002 and MFLUCC 25-0003 morphologically resemble the ex-type of C. schimae (LC13880) with hyaline, cylindrical conidiogenous cells and hyaline, smooth-walled, guttulate, and cylindrical to fusoid conidia with acute ends (Liu et al. 2022). Additionally, the conidial length-to-width ratio (L/W) of our isolates is similar to that of C. schimae (LC13880) (L/W ratio = 3.3 vs. 3.3).

Based on phylogenetic and morphological species concepts, we identify our isolates as Colletotrichum schimae. This study represents the first report of C. schimae associated with leaf spots on Jasminum sp. and establishes a new geographical record in Thailand.

Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex

Colletotrichum castaneae Y.Q. Yang, Q. Zhang, K.D. Hyde & Yong Wang bis, in Zhang et al., Mycosphere 14(2):24 (2023)

Figs 2, 6

Description.

Associated with leaf spots of Jasminum grandiflorum. Leaf spots irregular, pale brown to brown. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 150–500 µm diam. (x̄ = 250 µm, n = 5), semi-immersed, scattered or segregated, globose to subglobose, dark brown to black, exuding glistening yellowish to orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores hyaline. Conidiogenous cells 6.5–28 × 2–5 µm (x̄ = 18.6 × 3.1 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical to ampulliform, solitary or branched, straight or flexuous, tapering towards the apex. Conidia 13.5–19.5 × 4–6 µm (x̄ = 16.1 × 5 µm, n = 30; L/W ratio = 3.2), hyaline, cylindrical, straight, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, mostly with rounded ends. Appressoria not observed.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 65 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 °C; mycelium initially white, becoming yellowish to olivaceous brown with age; elevation flat, aerial, and filamentous with an entire or undulate margin.

Figure 6. 

Colletotrichum castaneae. a. Leaf spots (Jasminum grandiflorum); b, c. Top and reverse of colony on PDA after 3 d d Conidiogenesis and developing conidia; e, f. Conidia. Scale bars: 10 μm.

Specimens examined.

Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Doi Inthanon National Park, Kew Mae Pan nature trail, associated with leaf spots of Jasminum grandiflorum (Oleaceae), 20 Oct 2021, D. Gomdola DGJas3(L6)-C (MFLU 25-0003, BHH 50477), living culture MFLUCC 25-0004; DGJas3(L9)-B (MFLU 25-0004, BHH 50479), living culture MFLUCC 25-0005.

GenBank accession numbers.

MFLUCC 25-0004; ITS = PV263291; GAPDH = PV290897; CHS1 = PV274248; ACT = PV297874; and TUB2 = PV295617; MFLUCC 25-0005; ITS = PV263292; GAPDH = PV290898; CHS1 = PV274249; ACT = PV297875; and TUB2 = PV295618.

Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles.

Associated with leaf spots of Castanea mollissima in China (Zhang et al. 2023a) and Jasminum grandiflorum in Thailand (this study).

Notes.

Based on the phylogenetic analyses, our isolates (MFLUCC 25-0004 and MFLUCC 25-0005) grouped with 100% ML and 1.00 PP support. This sub-clade grouped with Colletotrichum castaneae (GUCC 21268.4, GUCC 12179, and GUCC 12176) with 100% ML and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 2). As per our findings, C. castaneae is located within the C. gloeosporioides species complex (Figs 1, 2), consistent with the study of Zhang et al. (2023a). No nucleotide differences were observed in the ITS region (526 bp) between our isolates and C. castaneae (GUCC 21268.4). The following sequence divergences were noted across other regions: 0.4% in GAPDH (1/228 bp), 0.9% in ACT (2/231 bp), 1.3% in CHS1 (3/225 bp), and 0.6% in TUB2 (3/495 bp).

MFLUCC 25-0004 and MFLUCC 25-0005 morphologically resemble the ex-type of C. castaneae (GUCC 21268.4) with hyaline, ampulliform to obclavate conidiogenous cells and hyaline, aseptate, smooth-walled, and cylindrical conidia, mostly with rounded ends (Zhang et al. 2023a). The conidial L/W ratio of our isolates is also similar to that of C. castaneae (GUCC 21268.4) (L/W ratio = 3.4 vs. 3.2).

Based on phylogenetic and morphological species concepts, we identify our isolates as Colletotrichum castaneae. This study represents the first report of C. castaneae associated with leaf spots on Jasminum grandiflorum and establishes a new geographical record in Thailand.

Colletotrichum chrysophilum W.A.S. Vieira, W.G. Lima, M.P.S. Câmara & V.P. Doyle, Mycologia 109(6): 927 (2017)

Figs 2, 7

Description.

Associated with leaf spots of Terminalia sp. Leaf spots irregular or oval, pale brown, surrounded with a dark brown margin. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph on substrate: Conidiomata 70–120 × 60–120 µm (x̄ = 94.5 × 96 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered, globose to subglobose, black, sometimes erumpent. Setae not observed. Conidiomatal wall 8.5–21 µm thick (x̄ = 14.6 µm, n = 10), consisting of 3–5 layers of thick-walled pseudoparenchymatous cells of textura angularis, outer layers dark brown, inner layer pale brown to hyaline. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiophores hyaline, smooth-walled, aseptate, unbranched. Conidiogenous cells 16–22 × 3–4.5 µm (x̄ = 18.9 × 3.6 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical to ampulliform, straight or flexuous, tapering towards the apex. Conidia 13–19 × 4.5–6 µm (x̄ = 15.8 × 5.1 µm, n = 30; L/W ratio = 3.1), hyaline, cylindrical or oblong, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, mostly with rounded ends. Appressoria 7–12 × 7–13 µm (x̄ = 10.9 × 10.5 µm, n = 5), hyaline, single-celled, globose to subglobose or irregular, smooth-walled.

Figure 7. 

Colletotrichum chrysophilum. a. Leaf spot (Terminalia sp.); b. Close up of a leaf spot; c. Conidiomata on substrate; d, e. Top and reverse of colony on PDA after 3 d f Section through a conidioma; g. Conidiomatal wall; h, i. Conidiogenesis and developing conidia; j, k. Appressoria; l, m. Conidia. Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 200 μm (c); 50 μm (f); 10 μm (g–m).

Culture characteristics.

Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 45 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 °C; mycelium greyish white, elevation flat or raised, aerial and filamentous with an entire or undulate margin.

Specimen examined.

Thailand • Chiang Rai Province, around the vicinity of Central Plaza, associated with leaf spots of Terminalia sp. (Combretaceae), 11 Jul 2019, D. Gomdola DG01-SM (MFLU 25-0005), living culture MFLUCC 25-0006.

GenBank accession numbers.

ITS = PV263293; GAPDH = PV290899; CHS1 = PV274250; ACT = PV297876; TUB2 = PV295619; H3 = PV400141; and CAM = PV299285.

Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles

(listed chronologically). Endophytic on Theobroma cacao and Genipa americana in Panama (Rojas et al. 2010) and Terpsichore taxifolia in Puerto Rico (Doyle et al. 2013).

Pathogenic; anthracnose on fruits of Musa sp. in Minas Gerais, Pernambuco, Santa Catarina, and São Paulo states in Brazil and Mexico (Vieira et al. 2017; Fuentes-Aragón et al. 2021), leaves of Anacardium humile and A. occidentale in Brazil (Veloso et al. 2018, 2021), fruits of Mangifera indica in Mexico (Fuentes-Aragón et al. 2020a), fruits of Persea americana in Mexico (Fuentes-Aragón et al. 2020b) and Brazil (Soares et al. 2021), leaves of Bauhinia forficata in Brazil (de Souza Junior et al. 2021), leaves of Manihot esculenta in Brazil (Machado et al. 2021), fruits of Carica papaya in Mexico (Pacheco-Esteva et al. 2022), and leaves of Vaccinium corymbosum in Brazil (Soares et al. 2022).

Bitter rot of Malus domestica in New York (Khodadadi et al. 2020) and Spain (Cabrefiga et al. 2022).

Preharvest decay of Malus domestica in Italy (Deltedesco and Oettl 2023).

Leaf spots on Euterpe oleracea and Malus domestica in Brazil and Uruguay (Astolfi et al. 2022; dos Santos et al. 2022; Andrello et al. 2024).

Associated with leaf spots of Terminalia sp. in Thailand (this study).

Notes.

Our isolate (MFLUCC 25-0006) grouped with Colletotrichum chrysophilum (URM7368, A20_F13_004, PP_212b, PP_211a, PP_209c, PP_208d, PP_210d, and CBS 146410) with 100% ML and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 2). Based on our phylogenetic analyses, C. chrysophilum is positioned within the C. gloeosporioides species complex (Figs 1, 2), congruent with the findings of Vieira et al. (2017). No nucleotide difference was observed in ITS (495 bp), GAPDH (219 bp), CHS1 (267 bp), ACT (216 bp), TUB2 (648 bp), and CAM (656 bp) regions between our isolate (MFLUCC 25-0006) and C. chrysophilum (URM7368).

MFLUCC 25-0006 is morphologically similar to the ex-type of C. chrysophilum (URM7368), producing hyaline, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, and cylindrical or oblong conidia with rounded ends (Vieira et al. 2017). The conidial L/W ratio of our isolate is similar to that of C. chrysophilum (URM7368) (L/W ratio = 3.1 vs. 3.1).

Based on phylogenetic and morphological species concepts, we identify our isolate as Colletotrichum chrysophilum. This study represents the first report of C. chrysophilum associated with leaf spots on Terminalia sp. and establishes a new geographical record in Thailand.

Colletotrichum endophyticum Manamgoda, Udayanga, L. Cai & K.D. Hyde [as ‘ endophytica’], in Manamgoda et al. Fungal Diversity 61:110 (2013)

Figs 2, 8

Description.

Associated with leaf spots, blight, and blotches. Leaf spots circular, brown, surrounded with a dark brown to black margin. Leaf blight and leaf blotches brown to dark brown. Sexual morph on substrate: Ascomata 100–150 × 100–120 µm (x̄ = 122 × 112 µm, n = 10), solitary or aggregated, semi-immersed, globose to subglobose, black, creamy at the center, ostiolate. Setae not observed. Peridium 9.5–18.5 µm thick (x̄ = 15.5 µm, n = 10), composed of 2–3 layers of thick-walled pseudoparenchymatous cells of textura angularis. Asci 54–88 × 12–21 µm (x̄ = 68.6 × 17.3 µm, n = 10), operculate, unitunicate, cylindrical to truncate or obovoid, 6–8-spored. Ascospores 15–17 × 4.5–6 µm (x̄ = 15.5 × 5.1 µm, n = 20; L/W ratio = 3.0), uniseriate or biseriate, hyaline, cylindrical to subellipsoidal or oblong, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, mostly with rounded or obtuse ends. Asexual morph on substrate: Conidiomata 120–250 × 120–150 µm (x̄ = 200 × 140 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered, globose to subglobose, black, sometimes erumpent, exuding creamy orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 200–1000 µm diam. (x̄ = 400 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered or segregated, globose to subglobose, exuding orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores 20–25 µm long (x̄ = 21.6 µm, n = 10), formed directly from mycelium, hyaline, cylindrical, branched, or unbranched. Conidiogenous cells 6–9 × 3–4.5 µm (x̄ = 7 × 3.5 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical, or ampulliform, straight or flexuous, tapering towards the apex. Conidia 14–19 × 4–6 µm (x̄ = 15.9 × 4.9 µm, n = 30; L/W ratio = 3.2), hyaline, cylindrical to ovoid, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, with rounded ends. Appressoria 8–11 × 7–8 µm (x̄ = 8.5 × 7.5 µm, n = 5), hyaline, single-celled, irregular, smooth-walled or verruculose.

Figure 8. 

Colletotrichum endophyticum. a, a1, a2. Schefflera sp. a. Diseased leaf with spots; a1. Close up of a leaf spot; a2. Ascomata on substrate; b, b1, b2. Artocarpus heterophyllus; b. Fallen dried leaf with spots; b1. Close up of a leaf spot; b2. Conidioma sporulating on substrate; c. Leaf blight (Ficus auriculata); d. Leaf spots (Begonia luxurians); e. Fallen dried leaf with spots (Castanopsis sp.); f. Leaf blotches (Cassia sp.); g. Section through an ascoma; h. Peridium; i. Asci; j. Ascospores; k–m. Conidiogenesis and developing conidia; n–r. Conidia; s. Germinated conidium; t. Appressorium formed on PDA; u, v. Top and reverse of colony on PDA after 7 d; w, x. Spore mass formation on PDA after 21 d. Scale bars: 3 mm (a1, b1); 50 μm (a2, b2, g, I, x); 10 μm (h, j–m, s, t); 5 μm (n–r).

Culture characteristics.

Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 70 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 °C; mycelium initially white, becoming greyish white to dark grey at the center with age, elevation flat or raised, aerial and dense, with an entire margin, producing orange conidial mass.

Specimens examined.

Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, around vicinity of Mushroom Research Center, associated with leaf spots of Schefflera sp. (Araliaceae), 7 Jul 2021, D. Gomdola Div15-L1 (MFLU 25-0006), living culture MFLUCC 25-0007; Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, around vicinity of Mushroom Research Center, associated with spots on dried dead leaves of Artocarpus heterophyllus (Moraceae), 4 Apr 2023, D. Gomdola F6-A (MFLU 25-0007), living culture MFLUCC 25-0008; Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Doi Inthanon National Park, Highland Fisheries Unit, associated with leaf blight of Ficus auriculata (Moraceae), 18 Oct 2021, D. Gomdola DGM3(L1)-A (MFLU 25-0008, BHH 50481), living culture MFLUCC 25-0009; Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Mae On District, associated with leaf spots of Begonia luxurians (Begoniaceae), 26 Jun 2020, D. Gomdola Div10(L3)-T (MFLU 25-0009), living culture MFLUCC 25-0010; Thailand • Tak Province, associated with spots on dried dead leaves of Castanopsis sp. (Fagaceae), 16 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG153-T2 (MFLU 25-0010), living culture MFLUCC 25-0011; Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Mae On District, associated with leaf blotches of Cassia sp. (Fabaceae), 25 Jun 2020, D. Gomdola Div31(T)-A (MFLU 25-0011), living culture MFLUCC 25-0012.

GenBank accession numbers.

MFLUCC 25-0007; ITS = PV263294; GAPDH = PV290900; CHS1 = PV274251; ACT = PV297877; and TUB2 = PV295620; MFLUCC 25-0008; ITS = PV263295; GAPDH = PV290901; CHS1 = PV274252; ACT = PV297878; TUB2 = PV295621; H3 = PV400142; and CAM = PV299286; MFLUCC 25-0009; ITS = PV263296; GAPDH = PV290902; CHS1 = PV274253; and ACT = PV297879; MFLUCC 25-0010; ITS = PV263297; GAPDH = PV290903; CHS1 = PV274254; ACT = PV297880; TUB2 = PV295622; H3 = PV400143; and CAM = PV299287; MFLUCC 25-0011; ITS = PV263298; GAPDH = PV290904; CHS1 = PV274255; ACT = PV297881; TUB2 = PV295623; H3 = PV400144; and CAM = PV299288; and MFLUCC 25-0012; ITS = PV263299; GAPDH = PV290905; CHS1 = PV274256; ACT = PV297882; TUB2 = PV295624; H3 = PV400145; and CAM = PV299289.

Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles

(listed chronologically). Endophytic on leaves of Pennisetum purpureum in Thailand (Manamgoda et al. 2013) and fruits and leaves of Capsicum annuum in China (Diao et al. 2017).

Saprobic on an unknown wild fruit in Thailand (Udayanga et al. 2013).

Pathogenic; anthracnose on leaves of Camellia sinensis in China (Wang et al. 2016a), leaves and berries of Coffea canephora var. robusta in China (Cao et al. 2019b), fruits and leaves of Persea americana in Sri Lanka (Dissanayake et al. 2021) and Thailand (Armand and Jayawardena 2024), and leaves of Philodendron bipinnatifidum in China (Zhang et al. 2023c).

Fruit lesion of Capsicum annuum in Thailand (de Silva et al. 2019).

Leaf spots of Acacia confusa and Bauhinia blakeana in China (Manawasinghe et al. 2022; Liang et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2023b).

Associated with anthracnose of fruits and leaves of Mangifera indica (Li et al. 2019) and leaf spots of Artocarpus heterophyllus, Begonia luxurians, Castanopsis sp., and Schefflera sp., leaf blight of Ficus auriculata, and leaf blotches of Cassia sp. in Thailand (this study).

Notes.

Our isolates (MFLUCC 25-0007, MFLUCC 25-0008, MFLUCC 25-0009, MFLUCC 25-0010, MFLUCC 25-0011, and MFLUCC 25-0012) grouped with other strains of Colletotrichum endophyticum with 100% ML and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 2). In our phylogenetic analyses, C. endophyticum is positioned within the C. gloeosporioides species complex (Figs 1, 2), consistent with findings of Manamgoda et al. (2013), Jayawardena et al. (2016a), and Zhang et al. (2023b). The intraspecies nucleotide differences between our isolates and the ex-type of C. endophyticum (MFLUCC 13-0418) are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Intra-species nucleotide differences between our isolates and the ex-type of C. endophyticum (MFLUCC 13-0418). The numbers in each cell represent the number of nucleotide differences relative to the total length of the corresponding gene region.

Gene regions MFLUCC 25-0007 MFLUCC 25-0008 MFLUCC 25-0011 MFLUCC 25-0009 MFLUCC 25-0010 MFLUCC 25-0012
ITS 1/476 1/476 4/476 1/476 4/476 4/476
GAPDH 4/227 8/261 1/228 4/249 5/258 8/240
CHS1 2/247 3/279 4/279 5/245 1/279 5/277
ACT 1/234 2/220 2/236 3/234 2/235 2/234
TUB2 0/668 8/668 0/656 N/A 0/668 10/668
H3 N/A 6/360 0/360 N/A 1/360 7/360

Our isolates morphologically resemble the ex-type of C. endophyticum (MFLUCC 13-0418), having hyaline, cylindrical, or ampulliform conidiogenous cells and hyaline, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, and cylindrical to ovoid conidia with rounded ends. They also share similar colony characteristics, observed as white to greyish mycelium (Manamgoda et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2023b). Additionally, the conidial L/W ratio of our isolates is similar to that of C. endophyticum (MFLUCC 13-0418) (L/W ratio = 3.2 vs. 3.4).

Based on phylogenetic and morphological species concepts, we identify our isolates as Colletotrichum endophyticum. This study represents six new host records for C. endophyticum associated with leaf spots of Begonia luxurians and Schefflera sp., spots on dried dead leaves of Castanopsis sp. and Artocarpus heterophyllus, leaf blight of Ficus auriculata, and leaf blotches of Cassia sp. in Thailand. Additionally, this is the first report for its sexual morph.

Colletotrichum fructicola Prihast., L. Cai & K.D. Hyde, in Prihastuti et al. Fungal Diversity 39:96 (2009)

Figs 2, 9

Description.

Associated with leaf spots, blight, and blotches. Leaf spots circular or irregular, pale brown to brown, surrounded with a dark brown margin. Leaf blight brown, surrounded with a dark brown margin. Leaf blotches reddish brown to dark brown. Sexual morph on substrate: Ascomata 75–150 × 80–150 µm (x̄ = 95 × 98 µm, n = 5), solitary, semi-immersed, globose to subglobose, brown, ostiolate. Setae not observed. Sexual morph on PDA: Ascomata 100–200 × 100–190 µm (x̄ = 131 × 123 µm, n = 5), solitary or aggregated, semi-immersed or superficial, globose to subglobose, black. Setae not observed. Peridium 8–38 µm thick (x̄ = 19.1 µm, n = 10), composed of 3–4 layers of thick-walled pseudoparenchymatous cells of textura angularis. Asci 55–70 × 8–11 µm (x̄ = 63 × 9.5 µm, n = 10), operculate, unitunicate, cylindrical to clavate or cymbiform, 6–8-spored. Ascospores 13–23.5 × 4–6.5 µm (x̄ = 17.9 × 5.1 µm, n = 25; L/W ratio = 3.5), uniseriate or biseriate, hyaline, subellipsoidal or oblong, reniform to falcate, somewhat fusiform, slightly curved, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, mostly with obtuse or acute ends. Asexual morph on substrate: Conidiomata 80–150 × 60–140 µm (x̄ = 100 × 90 µm, n = 5), solitary, semi-immersed, globose to subglobose, brown, producing creamy to orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 200–800 µm diam. (x̄ = 350 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered or aggregated, globose to subglobose, exuding creamy to orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores formed directly from mycelium, hyaline, cylindrical, branched, or unbranched. Conidiogenous cells 6.5–22 × 2–4 µm (x̄ = 12.1 × 3 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical, or ampulliform, straight or flexuous, tapering towards the apex. Conidia 12–18 × 4.5–5.5 µm (x̄ = 15.4 × 5 µm, n = 25; L/W ratio = 3.1), hyaline, cylindrical to ovoid, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, with rounded ends. Chlamydospores 6–7 × 6.5–8 µm (x̄ = 6.3 × 7.2 µm, n = 5), globose to subglobose, pale brown. Appressoria Not observed.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 80 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 °C; mycelium initially white, becoming dark grey at the center when aged, elevation flat or raised, aerial and dense, with an entire margin.

Figure 9. 

Colletotrichum fructicola. a. Leaf spots (Castanea sp.); b. Leaf blight (Hedychium sp.); c. Leaf blotches (Rhododendron sp.); d. Ascomata on substrate (Rhododendron sp.); e. Conidiomata sporulating on substrate (Hedychium sp.); f. Top and reverse of colony on PDA after 21 d; g. Clusters of ascomata formed on culture; h. Section through ascomata; i. Peridium; j, k. Asci; l–q. Ascospores; r. Chlamydospore; s. Conidiogenesis and developing conidia; t–v. Conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (d, e, g); 100 μm (h); 10 μm (i–v).

Specimens examined.

Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Omkoi District, Yiang Piang Subdistrict, associated with leaf spots of Castanea sp. (Fagaceae), 16 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG367-L2 (MFLU 25-0012), living culture MFLUCC 25-0013; DG367(L2)-A (MFLU 25-0013), living culture MFLUCC 25-0014; DG367(L2)-B (MFLU 25-0014), living culture MFLUCC 25-0015; Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Doi Lo District, associated with leaf blight of Hedychium sp. (Zingiberaceae), 15 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG327 (MFLU 25-0015), living culture MFLUCC 25-0016; Thailand • Chiang Rai Province, around the vicinity of Central Plaza, associated with leaf blotches of Rhododendron sp. (Ericaceae), 11 Jul 2019, D. Gomdola DG03.1 (MFLU 25-0016), living culture MFLUCC 25-0017.

GenBank accession numbers.

MFLUCC 25-0013; ITS = PV263300; GAPDH = PV290906; CHS1 = PV274257; ACT = PV297883; and TUB2 = PV295625; MFLUCC 25-0014; ITS = PV263301; GAPDH = PV290907; CHS1 = PV274258; ACT = PV297884; and H3 = PV549703; MFLUCC 25-0015; ITS = PV263302; GAPDH = PV290908; CHS1 = PV274259; ACT = PV297885; and H3 = PV400146; MFLUCC 25-0016; ITS = PV263303; GAPDH = PV290909; CHS1 = PV274260; and H3 = PV400147; and CAM = PV299290; and MFLUCC 25-0017; ITS = PV263304; GAPDH = PV290910; CHS1 = PV274261; ACT = PV297886; TUB2 = PV295626; H3 = PV400148; and CAM = PV299291.

Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles

(listed chronologically). Pathogenic on plants; Leaf spots of Ficus edulis in Germany and Limonium spp. in Israel (Weir et al. 2012); Pyrus pyrifolia (Zhang et al. 2015), Dalbergia hupeana (Zhou et al. 2022), Myrica rubra (Li et al. 2022a), Ziziphus mauritiana (Shu et al. 2021), Zamia furfuracea (Manawasinghe et al. 2022), Liriodendron chinense × tulipifera (Wan et al. 2022), Magnolia wufengensis (Yin et al. 2022), Illicium verum (Zhao et al. 2022), Camellia sinensis, Curcuma phaeocaulis, Ilex chinensis, Ligustrum lucidum and Zingiber officinale (Zhang et al. 2023a), and Celosia cristata, Cymbidium sinense and Dendrobium nobile in China (Zhang et al. 2023b); Malus domestica in Uruguay (Casanova et al. 2017; Alaniz et al. 2019); and Nephrolepis cordifolia (Seifollahi et al. 2023) and Rhizophora apiculata in Thailand (Norphanphoun and Hyde 2023).

Leaf blotch of Aesculus chinensis in China (Sun et al. 2020) and brown blight of Camellia sinensis in Taiwan (Lin et al. 2023a).

Shot-hole on leaves of Prunus sibirica in China (Han et al. 2023).

Brown sunken cladode spots of Nopalea cochenillifera in Brazil (Conforto et al. 2017).

Anthracnose of Dioscorea spp. in Nigeria (Weir et al. 2012); Pyrus bretschneideri, P. communis and P. pyrifolia in China (Weir et al. 2012; Li et al. 2013; Fu et al. 2019) and Pyrus pyrifolia × P. communis in Korea (Choi and Park 2021); Citrus spp. in China (Huang et al. 2013; Hu et al. 2019) and Iran (Arzanlou et al. 2015; Taheri et al. 2016); Hylocerous undatus and Ziziphus sp. in Thailand (Udayanga et al. 2013); Mangifera indica in Brazil (Lima et al. 2013, 2015), India (Sharma et al. 2013), Korea (Joa et al. 2016), China (Li et al. 2019), Mexico (Tovar-Pedraza et al. 2020), Egypt (Ismail and El-Ganainy 2022) and Taiwan (Wu et al. 2020; Lin et al. 2023b); Rubus glaucus in Colombia (Afanador-Kafuri et al. 2014); Gleditsia caspica in Iran (Arzanlou et al. 2015); Prunus persica in USA (Hu et al. 2015), Korea (Lee et al. 2020) and China (Tan et al. 2022); Camellia sinensis in China (Liu et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2016a; Lu et al. 2018; Shi et al. 2018) and Indonesia (Weir et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2015); Corchorus capsularis (Niu et al. 2016a, 2016b) and Fragaria × ananassa (Han et al. 2016; Jayawardena et al. 2016b; He et al. 2019; Chen et al. 2020; Jian et al. 2021); Aucuba japonica in China (Li et al. 2016) and Korea (Hassan et al. 2023); Annona spp. in Brazil (Costa et al. 2016, 2019); Capsicum spp. in China (Liu et al. 2016; Diao et al. 2017), Thailand (de Silva et al. 2019) and Malaysia (Noor and Zakaria 2018); Nicotiana tabacum in China (Wang et al. 2016b); Carica papaya in India (Saini et al. 2016), Mexico (Marquez-Zequera et al. 2018), Costa Rica (Ruiz-Campos et al. 2022) and Brazil (Vieira et al. 2022); Fatsia japonica in china (Shi et al. 2017); Malus domestica in Iran (Arzanlou et al. 2015) and Korea (Kim et al. 2018, 2020); Anacardium occidentale, A. othonianum and A. humile in Brazil (Veloso et al. 2018, 2021); Juglans regia (Wang et al. 2018; Li et al. 2023a) and Pouteria campechiana in China (Yang et al. 2021); Diospyros kaki in Brazil (Carraro et al. 2019), Philippines (Evallo et al. 2022) and China (Zhang et al. 2023d); Hevea brasiliensis in China (Cao et al. 2019a) and Brazil (Santos de Oliveira et al. 2020); Coffea arabica in China (Cao et al. 2019b) and Puerto Rico (Serrato-Diaz et al. 2020); Salvia greggii in Italy (Guarnaccia et al. 2019); Vitis labruscana and V. vinifera in Korea (Lim et al. 2020); Manihot esculenta in China (Liu et al. 2018) and Brazil (Bragança et al. 2016; Santos de Oliveira et al. 2020); Dendrobium officinale in China (Ma et al. 2019); Cattleya spp. and Phalaenopsis sp. in Brazil (Silva-Cabral et al. 2019); Areca catechu (Cao et al. 2020), Peucedanum praeruptorum (Ma et al. 2020), Crinum asiaticum (Qing et al. 2020), Camellia oleifera (Wang et al. 2020) and Paris polyphylla var. chinensis in China (Zhou et al. 2020); Ceanothus thyrsiflorus, Hydrangea paniculata, Cyclamen persicum and Liquidambar styraciflua in Italy (Guarnaccia et al. 2021); Persea americana in Colombia (Gañán et al. 2015), Israel (Sharma et al. 2017), Mexico (Fuentes-Aragón et al. 2018), New Zealand (Hofer et al. 2021) and Thailand (Armand and Jayawardena 2024); Allium cepa in Brazil (Henrique Lopes et al. 2021); Musa spp. (Huang et al. 2021a), Eichhornia crassipes (Huang et al. 2021b) and Eriobotrya japonica in China (Kuang et al. 2021); Camellia sinensis in Taiwan (Lin et al. 2021); Eucalyptus spp. in South Africa (Mangwende et al. 2021); Amomum villosum (Song et al. 2021), Rubus corchorifolius (Wu et al. 2021), Camellia chrysantha (Zhao et al. 2021), Cyclocarya paliurus (Zheng et al. 2021) and Camellia grijsii (=C. yuhsienensis) in China (Chen et al. 2022); Ziziphus jujuba (=Z. mauritiana) in Taiwan (Duan and Chen 2022); Atractylodes ovata in Korea (Hassan et al. 2022); Cunninghamia lanceolata (He et al. 2022), Prunus salicina (Huang et al. 2022a) and Phoebe sheareri in China (Huang et al. 2022b); Actinidia spp. in China and Japan (Huang et al. 2022c; Poti et al. 2023); Carya illinoinensis (Chang et al. 2022), Macadamia integrifolia (Li et al. 2023b), Luffa cylindrica (Li et al. 2022b), Loropetalum chinense (Qiu et al. 2022), Prunus avium (Tang et al. 2022), Bletilla striata (Wang et al. 2022), Brassica parachinensis (Yu et al. 2022a), Radermachera sinica (Yu et al. 2022b), Arachis hypogaea (Gong et al. 2023), Osmanthus fragrans (He et al. 2023; Sui et al. 2024), Averrhoa carambola (Li and Zhang 2023), Carya cathayensis (Ma et al. 2023), Tetrapanax papyrifer (Tang et al. 2023) and Glycine max in China (Xu et al. 2023).

Fruit rot of Persea americana in Australia (Weir et al. 2012), Nephelium lappaceum in Puerto Rico (Serrato-Diaz et al. 2017), and Ziziphus mauritiana in China (Fan et al. 2022).

Ripe rot of Vitis spp. in Brazil (Echeverrigaray et al. 2020).

Bitter rot of Malus domestica in China (Fu et al. 2013), the USA (Weir et al. 2012; Munir et al. 2016), Brazil (Weir et al. 2012; Velho et al. 2015, 2018, 2019; Moreira et al. 2019), Uruguay (Alaniz et al. 2015; Velho et al. 2015), Japan (Yokosawa et al. 2017), Korea (Oo et al. 2018; Park et al. 2018), France (Nodet et al. 2019), and Italy (Wenneker et al. 2021).

Associated with spathe rot, spadix rot, and leaf spots of Anthurium andraeanum in Sri Lanka (Vithanage et al. 2021); leaf spots of Castanea sp., leaf blight of Hedychium sp., and leaf blotches of Rhododendron sp. in Thailand (this study).

Colletotrichum fructicola was also reported from Fragaria × ananassa in Canada and the USA (Weir et al. 2012) and Morus alba in China but showed no pathogenicity (Xue et al. 2019). Furthermore, it was reported to cause diseases on Vernicia montana, Cinnamomum camphora, Paulownia fortunei, and Schima superba in China (Sui et al. 2024).

Pathogenic on a nematode in China; infects horsehair worms (Chordodes formosanus), a parasite of praying mantises (De Vivo et al. 2021).

Pathogenic on humans ; causes Colletotrichum keratitis, a fungal infection of human eyes (Hung et al. 2020).

Endophytic on Tetragastris panamensis and Theobroma cacao in Panama (Weir et al. 2012), Cymbopogon citratus and Pennisetum purpureum in Thailand (Manamgoda et al. 2013), Licania tomentosa in Brazil (Lisboa et al. 2018), Dendrobium spp. in China (Ma et al. 2018), Coffea arabica in Thailand (Numponsak et al. 2018), and Magnolia candolli in China (De Silva et al. 2021).

Notes.

Our isolates (MFLUCC 25-0013, MFLUCC 25-0014, MFLUCC 25-0015, MFLUCC 25-0016, and MFLUCC 25-0017) grouped with other strains of Colletotrichum fructicola with 99% ML and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 2). Colletotrichum fructicola is located in the C. gloeosporioides species complex (Figs 1, 2), consistent with findings of Prihastuti et al. (2009), Ma et al. (2018), Norphanphoun and Hyde (2023), and Zhang et al. (2023b). No intraspecies nucleotide differences were observed between our isolates and the ex-type of C. fructicola (ICMP 18581) across the ITS, GAPDH, CHS1, ACT, and TUB2 regions. However, a sequence divergence of 0.7% (5/731 bp) was observed in CAM between our isolate (MFLUCC 25-0017) and C. fructicola (ICMP 18581).

Our isolates morphologically resemble the ex-type of C. fructicola (ICMP 18581), having hyaline, smooth-walled, guttulate, and aseptate conidia and ascospores, with the conidia being cylindrical to ovoid with rounded ends and ascospores being oblong, reniform to falcate with obtuse or acute ends (Prihastuti et al. 2009). Notably, the ascospore and conidial lengths of our isolates vary slightly with other strains of C. fructicola. However, the L/W ratios of our isolates are similar to those of other C. fructicola strains. The ascospore L/W ratio of our isolates is 3.5, while those from other studies are ICMP 18581 = 3.6 (Prihastuti et al. 2009), MFLUCC 14-0087 = 3.4 (Ma et al. 2018), MFLUCC 17-1752 = 3.2 (Norphanphoun and Hyde 2023), and ZHKUCC 23-0829 = 3.7 (Zhang et al. 2023b). The conidial L/W ratio of our isolates is 3.1, while those from other studies are ICMP 18581 = 3.2 (Prihastuti et al. 2009), MFLUCC 14-0087 = 2.9 (Ma et al. 2018), and MFLUCC 17-1752 = 2.6 (Norphanphoun and Hyde 2023).

Based on phylogenetic and morphological species concepts, we identify our isolates as Colletotrichum fructicola. This study represents three new host records for C. fructicola associated with leaf spots of Castanea sp., leaf blight of Hedychium sp., and leaf blotches of Rhododendron sp. in Thailand.

Colletotrichum jiangxiense F. Liu & L. Cai, in Liu et al. Persoonia 35:82 (2015)

Figs 2, 10

Description.

Associated with leaf spots of Artocarpus sp. Leaf spots circular, oval, or irregular, pale brown to brown, surrounded with a dark brown margin. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph on substrate: Conidiomata 200–500 × 150–400 µm (x̄ = 300 × 200 µm, n = 10), acervular, semi-immersed, scattered or gregarious, globose to subglobose, dark brown to black, erumpent, exuding creamy orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 200–1000 µm diam. (x̄ = 400 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered or gregarious, globose to subglobose, dark brown to black, exuding creamy orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores hyaline, sometimes branched. Conidiogenous cells 12–19 × 2–5 µm (x̄ = 14.9 × 3.2 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical to ampulliform, straight or flexuous. Conidia 14–21 × 4–6.5 µm (x̄ = 16.5 × 5.2 µm, n = 30; L/W ratio = 3.2), hyaline, cylindrical to ellipsoidal, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, with rounded ends (sometimes tapering towards one end), forming conidial anastomosis tubes. Conidial anastomosis tubes 2–16 × 1–2 µm (x̄ = 8.2 × 1.5 µm, n = 10), hyaline, smooth-walled, aseptate. Appressoria not observed.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 55 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 °C; mycelium white to grey, elevation flat, cottony, with an entire margin.

Figure 10. 

Colletotrichum jiangxiense. a. Leaf spots (Artocarpus sp.); b. Conidiomata on substrate; c. Top and reverse of colony on PDA after 7 d; d, e. Conidiogenesis and developing conidia; f, g. Conidia; h. Conidia forming conidial anastomosis tubes. Scale bars: 200 μm (b); 50 μm (d); 20 μm (e); 10 μm (f–h).

Specimen examined.

Thailand • Chiang Mai: Omkoi District, Yiang Piang Subdistrict, associated with leaf spots of Artocarpus sp. (Moraceae), 16 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG360 (MFLU 25-0017), living culture MFLUCC 25-0018.

GenBank.

ITS = PV263305; TUB2 = PV295627; H3 = PV400149.

Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles

(listed chronologically). Endophytic on Camellia sinensis in China (Liu et al. 2015; Jayawardena et al. 2016a).

Pathogenic; brown lesions on leaves of Camellia sinensis in China (Liu et al. 2015).

Anthracnose on fruits of Persea americana in Mexico (Ayvar-Serna et al. 2020; Fuentes-Aragón et al. 2020b).

Leaf spots of Fraxinus americana in China (Chang et al. 2023).

Associated with leaf spots of Artocarpus sp. in Thailand (this study).

Notes.

Our isolate (MFLUCC 25-0018) grouped with Colletotrichum jiangxiense (CGMCC 3.1736, 22N642, SYD-9, and SYD-4) with 90% ML support (Fig. 2). However, this clade has low support for other species. Similar to the study conducted by Liu et al. (2015), this research shows that C. jiangxiense is located in the C. gloeosporioides species complex (Figs 1, 2). Nucleotide sequence comparisons between our isolate and C. jiangxiense (CGMCC 3.17363) showed no difference in the ITS (505 bp) and TUB2 (667 bp) regions.

MFLUCC 25-0018 morphologically resembles the ex-type of C. jiangxiense (CGMCC 3.17363), having hyaline, aseptate, smooth-walled, and cylindrical conidia (Liu et al. 2015). The conidial L/W ratio of our isolate is close to that of C. jiangxiense (CGMCC 3.17363) (L/W ratio = 2.9 vs. 3.2).

Based on phylogenetic and morphological species concepts, we identify our isolate as Colletotrichum jiangxiense. This study represents the first report of C. jiangxiense associated with leaf spots on Artocarpus sp. and establishes a new geographical record in Thailand.

Colletotrichum spaethianum species complex

Colletotrichum dendrobii Gomdola, K.D. Hyde & Jayaward., sp. nov.

Figs 3, 11

Holotype.

MFLU 25-0018.

Etymology.

The epithet refers to the host genus, Dendrobium, from which the species was isolated.

Description.

Associated with pod blight of Dendrobium sp. Pod blight elongated, pale brown to brown, surrounded with a dark brown margin. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph on substrate: Conidiomata 200–300 × 180–200 µm (x̄ = 240 × 190 µm, n = 5), acervular, semi-immersed, scattered or gregarious, dark brown to black. Setae 30–200 µm long (x̄ = 103 µm, n = 30), scattered or aggregated, straight or flexuous, smooth-walled, 1–5-septate, brown to dark brown, base darker and apex paler, base 3.5–12.5 µm wide (x̄ = 7.1 µm, n = 30), cylindrical or ampulliform, tapering to 1.5–5.5 µm (x̄ = 3.1 µm, n = 30) at the apex. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 200–1000 µm diam. (x̄ = 450 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered or aggregated, globose to subglobose, black, exuding orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores 13–30 µm long (x̄ = 19.7 µm, n = 10), hyaline, branched or unbranched, smooth-walled. Conidiogenous cells 6–14(–20) × 2.5–4.5 µm (x̄ = 8.3 × 3.5 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical to ampulliform, sometimes elongated, straight or flexuous. Conidia 11–19 × 4–6 µm (x̄ = 16.7 × 4.8 µm, n = 30; L/W ratio = 3.5), hyaline, falcate or fusiform, sometimes cylindrical or irregular in shape, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, tapering towards both ends, base conical or rounded, apex acute. Appressoria 15–17 × 17–19 µm (x̄ = 15.6 × 17.8 µm, n = 5), hyaline, single-celled, globose to subglobose, smooth-walled or verruculose.

Figure 11. 

Colletotrichum dendrobii (MFLU 25-0018, holotype); a, b. Pod blight (Dendrobium sp.); c. Conidiomata with setae on substrate; d. Setae; e. Top and reverse of colony on PDA after 30 d; f. Conidiogenesis and developing conidia; g–m. Conidia; n, o. Appressoria. Scale bars: 200 μm (c); 10 μm (d, f–o).

Culture characteristics.

Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 70 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 °C; mycelium initially greyish white, becoming dark grey to olivaceous brown with age; elevation flat, with an entire or undulate margin.

Specimen examined.

Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Omkoi District, Yiang Piang Subdistrict, associated with pod blight of Dendrobium sp. (Orchidaceae), 16 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG386 (MFLU 25-0018, holotype), ex-type MFLUCC 25-0019.

Additional specimen examined.

Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Omkoi District, Yiang Piang Subdistrict, associated with pod blight of Dendrobium sp. (Orchidaceae), 17 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG387 (MFLU 25-0019), living culture MFLUCC 25-0020.

GenBank accession numbers.

MFLUCC 25-0019; ITS = PV263306; GAPDH = PV290911; CHS1 = PV274262; ACT = PV297887; H3 = PV400150; and CAM = PV299292; MFLUCC 25-0020; ITS = PV263307; and GAPDH = PV290912.

Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles.

Associated with pod blight of Dendrobium sp. in Thailand (this study).

Notes.

Our isolates (MFLUCC 25-0019 and MFLUCC 25-0020) grouped with 100% ML and 1.00 PP support. This sub-clade forms a sister clade to Colletotrichum verruculosum (IMI 45525) with strong support (100% ML and 1.00 PP), indicating a close phylogenetic relationship (Fig. 3). In the phylogenetic analyses, our isolates are positioned within the C. spaethianum species complex (Figs 1, 3). The interspecies nucleotide sequence comparison between our isolates (MFLUCC 25-0019 and MFLUCC 25-0020) and C. verruculosum (IMI 45525) revealed the following divergence pattern: 1.3% in ITS (7/519 bp), 3.1% in GAPDH (6/196 bp), 1.9% in ACT (4/211 bp), and 2.4% in H3 (9/371 bp) regions, but no nucleotide differences in CHS1 (251 bp) between MFLUCC 25-0019 and C. verruculosum.

Morphologically, the conidiophores and conidiogenous cells of our isolates are hyaline, while those of C. verruculosum (IMI 45525) are pale brown. Additionally, conidiophores of our isolates are shorter than those of C. verruculosum (up to 30 µm vs. 110 µm long). Conidiogenous cells of our isolates are also smaller compared to those of C. verruculosum (6–14(–20) × 2.5–4.5 µm vs. 10–25 × 3–5 µm). Setae of our isolates are 1–5-septate and 30–200 µm long, while those of C. verruculosum are 2–4-septate and 70–160 µm long. The conidial L/W ratio of our isolates differs from that of C. verruculosum (L/W ratio = 3.5 vs. 4.6) (Damm et al. 2009).

Based on phylogenetic analyses and morphological data following recommendations proposed by Chethana et al. (2021) and Jayawardena et al. (2021b), we establish our isolates as a new species, Colletotrichum dendrobii, associated with pod blight of Dendrobium sp. in Thailand.

The primary feature distinguishing Colletotrichum dendrobii from C. verruculosum (IMI 45525) is its variable and irregular conidial shape, along with their distinct phylogenetic lineages.

Colletotrichum singleton species

Colletotrichum musichiangmaiense Gomdola, K.D. Hyde & Jayaward., sp. nov.

Figs 1, 12

Holotype.

MFLU 25-0020.

Etymology.

The compound epithet refers to the host genus, Musa, from which the species was isolated, and the location, Chiang Mai, where the fungus was collected.

Description.

Associated with leaf blight of Musa sp. Leaf blight elongated, pale brown to brown, surrounded with a dark brown margin. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 200–1000 µm diam. (x̄ = 450 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered or gregarious, globose to subglobose, dark brown to black, exuding creamy orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores formed directly from mycelium, hyaline, aseptate, smooth-walled. Conidiogenous cells 9–16 × 2–6 µm (x̄ = 13.2 × 4.2 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical to ampulliform or clavate, straight or flexuous, tapering towards the apex. Conidia 12–19 × 4.5–6 µm (x̄ = 15.7 × 5.4 µm, n = 30; L/W ratio = 2.9), hyaline, cylindrical to clavate, straight or slightly flexuous, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, mostly with obtusely rounded ends (sometimes tapering towards one end). Appressoria not observed.

Figure 12. 

Colletotrichum musichiangmaiense (MFLU 25-0020, holotype). a. Leaf blight (Musa sp.); b. Top and reverse of colony on MEA after 5 d; c. Spore mass formation on MEA after 21 d; d. Conidiogenesis and developing conidia; e–g. Conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (c); 10 μm (d–g).

Culture characteristics.

Colonies on MEA reaching approximately 75 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 °C; mycelium initially greyish white, becoming olivaceous brown with age, elevation flat, cottony, and fluffy, aerial and filamentous with an entire margin.

Specimen examined.

Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Omkoi District, Yiang Piang Subdistrict, associated with leaf blight of Musa sp. (Musaceae), 16 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG385-T2 (MFLU 25-0020, holotype), ex-type MFLUCC 25-0021.

GenBank accession numbers.

ITS = PV263308; GAPDH = PV290913; ACT = PV297888; and TUB2 = PV295628.

Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles.

Associated with leaf blight of Musa sp. in Thailand (this study).

Notes.

Our isolate (MFLUCC 25-0021) matches the morphological species concept of Colletotrichum (Jayawardena et al. 2021a). It forms a distinct lineage (99% ML and 1.00 PP support; Fig. 1), separate from other Colletotrichum species, and does not group within any species complex. Based primarily on its phylogenetic placement and supported by morphological data, we designate our isolate as a new singleton species, Colletotrichum musichiangmaiense, associated with leaf blight of Musa sp. in Thailand.

Discussion

The main aim of this study was to identify 20 isolates of Colletotrichum obtained from various diseased plants in Thailand based on morphological and phylogenetic species concepts. These isolates represent eight distinct species, encompassing two newly described taxa and six species that were reported from different hosts (accounting for 13 new host records). The Colletotrichum isolates obtained herein are distributed across three species complexes, except for one isolate that is a singleton species. The number of species and species complexes within this genus has been a topic of ongoing taxonomic debate (Marin-Felix et al. 2017; Bhunjun et al. 2021; Jayawardena et al. 2021a; Liu et al. 2022). Jayawardena et al. (2021a) recognized 14 species complexes in Colletotrichum. Liu et al. (2022) expanded this to 16 species complexes, while Talhinhas and Baroncelli (2023) proposed a further increase to 20 species complexes. Our updated phylogeny (Fig. 1), which was based on a large taxon sampling and the inclusion of seven informative gene regions (ITS and the genes encoding for GAPDH, CHS1, ACT, TUB2, H3, and CAM), identifies 15 species complexes within the genus. Including our newly introduced taxa (C. dendrobii and C. musichiangmaiense), there are currently 347 established species distributed in these 15 species complexes and 22 singleton species.

Based on our phylogenies, the species complexes are listed below in descending order of species richness, with the number of species in each complex indicated in brackets: C. gloeosporioides (84), C. acutatum (50), C. boninense (41), C. graminicola-caudatum (37), C. destructivum (25), C. dematium (19), C. gigasporum (15), C. dracaenophilum (14), C. orchidearum (13), C. spaethianum (12), C. magnum (10), C. orbiculare (9), C. agaves (7), C. truncatum (6), and C. bambusicola (5). Among these, the C. gloeosporioides species complex is the most speciose (Jayawardena et al. 2021a; Sui et al. 2024). Notably, in our study, 15 of the 20 isolates belong to five different species within this complex. Results obtained herein align with those of previous studies, highlighting the substantial diversity of the C. gloeosporioides species complex (Jayawardena et al. 2021a; Liu et al. 2022; Sui et al. 2024). Regarding singleton species, it is unclear in some cases whether they are truly singletons or belong to specific species complexes. In certain studies, some species are basal to specific species complexes and are thus classified as singletons, while in other studies, they group within a particular species complex (Sui et al. 2024). In this study, a few species that were initially introduced as singletons are now found to clade within specific species complexes. Accordingly, we classify the previously introduced singleton species, C. hsienjenchang and C. metake, within the C. bambusicola species complex, and C. orchidophilum within the C. orbiculare species complex.

Colletotrichum species exhibit life modes that allow them to manifest as saprobes, endophytes, and pathogens, depending on environmental conditions (Jayawardena et al. 2021a; Talhinhas and Baroncelli 2023). This ecological plasticity is significant, as certain species can switch from a symbiotic life mode (as endophytes or saprobes) to a pathogenic one under favorable conditions, such as when the host plant is stressed or weakened (Promputtha et al. 2007; Bhunjun et al. 2023). In this study, we isolated Colletotrichum species associated with foliar and pod diseases. Based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses of multiple gene regions, we established two novel species: C. dendrobii and C. musichiangmaiense. For C. dendrobii, the primary distinguishing feature compared to its sister taxon, C. verruculosum (IMI 45525), is its variable conidial shapes, a unique morphological trait not observed in C. verruculosum. The phylogenetic placement of C. dendrobii and the nucleotide differences between C. dendrobii and C. verruculosum further support its status as a new species. Regarding C. musichiangmaiense, phylogenetic analyses revealed that it does not group within any species complex and formed a completely distinct lineage, basal to the C. gloeosporioides species complex. Therefore, we confirmed C. musichiangmaiense as a new species distinct from any previously described taxa.

In addition to our two newly described species, we establish 13 new host records, representing six spp. isolated from various sites in Thailand, as listed below: C. castaneae (Jasminum grandiflorum), C. chrysophilum (Terminalia sp.), C. endophyticum (leaf spots of Artocarpus heterophyllus, Begonia luxurians, Castanopsis sp.; and Schefflera sp.; leaf blight of Ficus auriculata; and leaf blotches of Cassia sp.), C. fructicola (leaf spots of Castanea sp., leaf blight of Hedychium sp., and leaf blotches of Rhododendron sp.), C. jiangxiense, and C. schimae (leaf spots of Jasminum sp.). These species have also been documented from other hosts in previous studies (Doyle et al. 2013; Ayvar-Serna et al. 2020; Fuentes-Aragón et al. 2020b; Liu et al. 2022; Pacheco-Esteva et al. 2022; Soares et al. 2022; Tang et al. 2023; Xu et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2023a, 2023b, 2023c; Armand and Jayawardena 2024; Sui et al. 2024). Therefore, our findings further support the high diversity of Colletotrichum species, which are associated with a broad range of hosts.

Colletotrichum castaneae was previously found associated with Castanea mollissima in China (Zhang et al. 2023a), while we found it associated with leaf spots of Jasminum grandiflorum in Thailand. Colletotrichum chrysophilum, C. endophyticum, C. fructicola, and C. jiangxiense are reported to have a wide range of hosts, as mentioned in the taxonomy section. Colletotrichum endophyticum was initially identified as a leaf endophyte of Pennisetum purpureum in Thailand (Manamgoda et al. 2013). Later, it was reported in both saprobic and pathogenic life modes, causing diseases such as anthracnose, fruit lesions, and leaf spots (Udayanga et al. 2013; Manawasinghe et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2023c). In this study, C. endophyticum was isolated from six different hosts associated with foliar diseases: leaf spots of Begonia luxurians and Schefflera sp., leaf blight of Ficus auriculata, and leaf blotches of Cassia sp. Interestingly, it was also found associated with spots on dried dead leaves of Castanopsis sp. and Artocarpus heterophyllus. Since we isolated this fungus from spots of dry leaves, we speculate that it could colonize and infect living leaves, potentially leading to their senescence and death. However, since we did not conduct pathogenicity tests, we cannot confirm this hypothesis; the fungus could also be a saprobe on dead leaves. Colletotrichum schimae was initially reported only as an endophyte, with the suggestion that it might colonize host plants as a beneficial organism without causing disease (Liu et al. 2022; Liao et al. 2025). However, this species could be a potential opportunistic pathogen, as Sui et al. (2024) later reported it in a pathogenic mode from a few hosts. We report this species associated with leaf spots of Jasminum sp. in Thailand. Both C. endophyticum and C. schimae have a broader host range rather than being host-specific. Additionally, their life mode is not limited to endophytism, as initially presumed.

Interestingly, this study presents the first detailed description and illustration of the sexual morph of Colletotrichum endophyticum, offering new insights into its reproductive biology and lifecycle. So far, this species was solely reported in its asexual state as saprobes, endophytes, and pathogens. Therefore, this finding emphasizes the importance of examining both sexual and asexual morphs for a comprehensive understanding of Colletotrichum taxonomy, ecology, and reproductive strategies.

Over the past few years, extensive research has been conducted to identify and classify Colletotrichum taxa (Liu et al. 2022; Sui et al. 2024), and numerous novel species have been introduced (Manawasinghe et al. 2022; Armand et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2023b; Aumentado et al. 2024; Sui et al. 2024; Zapata et al. 2024; Zhang et al. 2024). However, introducing new species within Colletotrichum requires careful consideration, as they often exhibit cryptic morphologies, minimal nucleotide differences, and frequent grouping within the same clade with minor genetic divergence. As a result, taxonomists may classify them as distinct species, although they might represent the same species. Recently, many species have been synonymized under older taxa (Aumentado et al. 2024; Sui et al. 2024).

In this study, we observed a similar pattern where species could potentially be synonymized. The type strains of both Colletotrichum chrysophilum [URM 7368; W.A.S. Vieira, W.G. Lima, M.P.S. Câmara, and V.P. Doyle] and C. noveboracense [CBS 146410; F. Khodadadi, P.L. Martin, V.P. Doyle, J.B. Gonzalez, and S.G. Aćimović] are positioned within the same clade, with strong statistical support (100% ML and 1.00 PP) (Fig. 2). All other strains of these two species also cluster together with 100% ML and 1.00 PP support. Despite this close phylogenetic relationship, we did not synonymize C. noveboracense with C. chrysophilum due to a difference of 1.4% (9/664 bp) in the mating type (Mat1-2) gene (ApMat) [C. chrysophilum URM 7368; KX094325 and C. noveboracense CBS 146410; MN640564]. Additionally, a slight nucleotide difference of 0.9% (2/219 bp) was observed in the GAPDH region. However, no differences were found in the ITS (495 bp), ACT (216 bp), TUB2 (648 bp), and CAL (656 bp) regions between C. chrysophilum (URM 7368) and C. noveboracense (CBS 146410). Since we were unable to amplify the ApMat region from our strains, we could not directly compare our sequences with those of the type strains. Moreover, the observed difference in ApMat is relatively small and likely insufficient to justify segregation of the two species. Therefore, we have refrained from discussing their conspecificity (Vieira et al. 2017; Khodadadi et al. 2020).

To accurately identify and classify Colletotrichum species, a polyphasic approach, incorporating morphological traits with multigene phylogenetic analyses and geographical and/or ecological data, is recommended (Cai et al. 2009; Marin-Felix et al. 2017). Further studies focusing on the recollection and examination of problematic species are necessary to resolve their taxonomic placements and ensure a robust classification framework.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Shaun Pennycook for suggesting and validating the nomenclature of the new species. Deecksha Gomdola thanks Mae Fah Luang University for providing the MFU student scholarship 2020 (reference: GR-ST-FS-63-06) to pursue a PhD program and for allocating the thesis writing grant [reference: 7702(6)/201 (No.0275)] and the research presentation or publication grant [reference No.0285]. Deecksha Gomdola also expresses her gratitude to the Mushroom Research Foundation (MRF) and the National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA: Project No. P-19-52624), under the Doi Inthanon National Park Permission No. 0907.4/8218 and No. 0907.4/19647. Rajesh Jeewon thanks the University of Mauritius. Kevin D. Hyde and Fatimah Al-Otibi extend their appreciation to the Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program (DSFP), King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This research was funded by the Research Innovation Fund Project of Shandong Institute of Pomology (GSS2022QN02) and the Technology Program of Tai’an, China (2021NS092), Guizhou University, King Saud University, Mae Fah Luang University, Mushroom Research Foundation, National Science and Technology Development Agency.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: DG, RJ. Data curation: DG, XT. Formal analysis: DG. Funding acquisition: DG, YW, KDH. Investigation: DG. Methodology: DG. Resources: KDH, YW, LF. Software: DG. Supervision: RJ, RSJ, EHC, KDH, YW. Validation: RJ, RSJ, EHC, KDH, YW, LF, FA, XT. Visualization: DG. Writing - original draft: DG. Writing - review and editing: DG, RJ, RSJ, EHC, KDH, YW, LF, FA, XT.

Author ORCIDs

Deecksha Gomdola https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0817-1555

Rajesh Jeewon https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8563-957X

Eric H.C. McKenzie https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9400-7112

Ruvishika S. Jayawardena https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7702-4885

Fatimah Al-Otibi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3629-5755

Xia Tang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2705-604X

Kevin D. Hyde https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-0762

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Afanador-Kafuri L, González A, Gañán L, Mejía JF, Cardona N, Alvarez E (2014) Characterization of the Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose in Andean blackberry in Colombia. Plant Disease 98: 1503–1513. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-13-0752-RE
  • Alaniz S, Hernández L, Mondino P (2015) Colletotrichum fructicola is the dominant and one of the most aggressive species causing bitter rot of apple in Uruguay. Tropical Plant Pathology 40: 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-015-0025-9
  • Alaniz S, Cuozzo V, Martínez V, Stadnik MJ, Mondino P (2019) Ascospore infection and Colletotrichum species causing Glomerella leaf spot of apple in Uruguay. Plant Pathology Journal 35: 100–111. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.07.2018.0145
  • Andrello AJ, Velho AC, Soares VF, de Godoy RS, de Freitas MB, Valdebenito-Sanhueza RM, Kulcheski FR, Stadnik MJ (2024) Comparative virulence of Colletotrichum chrysophilum and Colletotrichum nymphaeae on apple leaves. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 131: 102285. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PMPP.2024.102285
  • Armand A, Jayawardena RS (2024) Morphomolecular identification and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species associated with avocado anthracnose in northern Thailand. Plant Pathology 73: 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/PPA.13792
  • Armand A, Hyde KD, Huanraluek N, Wang Y, Jayawardena RS (2023) Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with durian fruit in northern Thailand. Mycosphere 14: 107–129. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/14/si2/2
  • Arzanlou M, Bakhshi M, Karimi K, Torbati M (2015) Multigene phylogeny reveals three new records of Colletotrichum spp. and several new host records for the mycobiota of Iran. Journal of Plant Protection Research 55(2): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2015-0027
  • Astolfi P, Velho AC, Moreira V, Mondino PE, Alaniz SM, Stadnik MJ (2022) Reclassification of the main causal agent of Glomerella leaf spot on apple into Colletotrichum chrysophilum in southern Brazil and Uruguay. Phytopathology 112: 1825–1832. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-12-21-0527-sc
  • Aumentado HDR, Armand A, Phukhamsakda C, Hyde KD, Jones EBG, Jayawardena RS (2024) Polyphasic identification of two novel Colletotrichum species causing leaf spots on mangroves in Thailand. European Journal of Plant Pathology 169: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-024-02819-y
  • Ayvar-Serna S, Díaz-Nájera JF, Vargas-Hernández M, Camacho-Tapia M, Valencia-Rojas GA, Lima NB, Tovar-Pedraza JM (2021) First report of Colletotrichum jiangxiense causing avocado anthracnose in Mexico. Plant Disease 105: 502. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-20-0459-PDN
  • Bhunjun CS, Phukhamsakda C, Jayawardena RS, Jeewon R, Promputtha I, Hyde KD (2021) Investigating species boundaries in Colletotrichum. Fungal Diversity 107: 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-021-00471-z
  • Bragança CAD, Silva LL, Haddad F, Oliveira SAS (2016) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing anthracnose in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) in Brazil. Plant Disease 100: 857. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-15-0645-PDN
  • Cai L, Hyde KD, Taylor PWJ, Weir B, Waller J, Abang MM, Zhang JZ, Yang YL, Phoulivong S, Liu ZY et al. (2009) A polyphasic approach for studying Colletotrichum. Fungal Diversity 39: 183–204.
  • Cao X, Xu X, Che H, West JS, Luo D (2019a) Three Colletotrichum species, including a new species, are associated with leaf anthracnose of rubber tree in Hainan, China. Plant Disease 103: 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-18-0374-RE
  • Cao XR, Xu XM, Che HY, West JS, Luo DQ (2019b) Characteristics and distribution of Colletotrichum species in coffee plantations in Hainan, China. Plant Pathology 68: 1146–1156. https://doi.org/10.1111/PPA.13028
  • Cao X, Xu X, Che H, West JS, Luo D (2020) Eight Colletotrichum species, including a novel species, are associated with areca palm anthracnose in Hainan, China. Plant Disease 104: 1369–1377. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-19-2077-RE
  • Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T (2009) trimAl: A tool for automat ed alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25(15): 1972–1973. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348
  • Carraro TA, Lichtemberg PSF, Michailides TJ, Pereira WV, Figueiredo JAG, May-De Mio LL (2019) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola, C. nymphaeae, and C. melonis causing persimmon anthracnose in Brazil. Plant Disease 103: 2692. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-18-2241-PDN
  • Casanova L, Hernández L, Martínez E, Velho AC, Rockenbach MF, Stadnik MJ, Alaniz S, Mondino P (2017) First report of Glomerella leaf spot of apple caused by Colletotrichum fructicola in Uruguay. Plant Disease 101: 834. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-16-1320-PDN
  • Chaiwan N, Gomdola D, Wang S, Monkai J, Tibpromma S, Doilom M, Wanasinghe DN, Mortimer PE, Lumyong S, Hyde KD (2021) an online database providing updated information of microfungi in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Mycosphere 12: 1513–1526. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/19
  • Chang J, Zhai F, Zhang Y, Wang D, Shu J, Yao X (2022) Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum fioriniae and C. fructicola that cause anthracnose in pecan. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 1043750. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1043750
  • Chang L, Li Y, Gao Z, Bonello P, Cleary M, Munck IA, Santini A, Sun H (2023) Novel pathogen–plant host interaction: Colletotrichum jiangxiense and Fraxinus americana L. (white ash) in a sentinel garden in China. Plants 12: 4001. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234001
  • Chen XY, Dai DJ, Zhao SF, Shen Y, Wang HD, Zhang CQ (2020) Genetic diversity of Colletotrichum spp. causing strawberry anthracnose in Zhejiang, China. Plant Disease 104: 1351–1357. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-19-2026-RE
  • Chethana KWT, Manawasinghe IS, Hurdeal VG, Bhunjun CS, Appadoo MA, Gentekaki E, Raspé O, Promputtha I, Hyde KD (2021) What are fungal species and how to delineate them? Fungal Diversity 109: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13225-021-00483-9
  • Conforto C, Lima NB, Garcete-Gómez JM, Câmara MPS, Michereff SJ (2017) First report of Colletotrichum siamense and C. fructicola causing cladode brown spot in Nopalea cochenillifera in Brazil. Journal of Plant Pathology 99: 812.
  • Corda ACI (1831) Die Pilze Deutschlands. In: Strum J (Ed.) Deutschlands Flora in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen. Sturm Nürnberg 3: 33–64.
  • Costa JFO, Ramos-Sobrinho R, Chaves TP, Silva JRA, Pinho DB, Assunção IP, Lima GSA (2016) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing anthracnose on Annona leaves in Brazil. Plant Disease 101: 386. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-16-0927-PDN
  • Costa JF, Kamei SH, Silva JRA, Miranda ARGDS, Netto MB, da Silva SJC, Correia KC, de Andrade Lima GS, Assunção IP (2019) Species diversity of Colletotrichum infecting Annona spp. in Brazil. European Journal of Plant Pathology 153: 1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-018-01630-w
  • Damm U, Woudenberg JHC, Cannon PF, Crous PW (2009) Colletotrichum species with curved conidia from herbaceous hosts. Fungal Diversity 39: 45–87.
  • de Silva DD, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW, Ades PK, Nasruddin A, Mongkolporn O, Taylor PW (2019) Identification, prevalence and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose of Capsicum annuum in Asia. IMA Fungus 10: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-019-0001-y
  • De Silva NI, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Thambugala KM, Bhat DJ, Karunarathna SC, Tennakoon DS, Phookamsak R, Jayawardena RS, Lumyong S, Hyde KD (2021) Morphomolecular taxonomic studies reveal a high number of endophytic fungi from Magnolia candolli and M. garrettii in China and Thailand. Mycosphere 11: 163–237. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/3
  • de Souza FJC Junior, dos Vieira SantosWA, Veloso JS, Duarte IG, Amaral AGG, Laranjeira D, Balbino VDQ, Doyle VP, Câmara MPS (2021) Colletotrichum gloeosporioides sensu lato associated with anthracnose in Bauhinia forficata. European Journal of Plant Pathology 160: 745–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-021-02277-w
  • De Vivo M, Wang WH, Chen KH, Huang JP (2021) First detection of Colletotrichum fructicola (Ascomycota) on horsehair worms (Nematomorpha). Biodiversity Data Journal 23: e72798. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e72798
  • Diao YZ, Zhang C, Liu F, Wang WZ, Liu L, Cai L, Liu XL (2017) Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose disease of chili in China. Persoonia. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 38: 20–37. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158517X692788
  • Dissanayake DMS, Adikaram NKB, Yakandawala DMD, Jayasinghe L (2021) Molecular phylogeny-based identification of Colletotrichum endophytica and C. siamense as causal agents of avocado anthracnose in Sri Lanka. Ceylon Journal of Science 50: 449–458. https://doi.org/10.4038/cjs.v50i4.7943
  • dos Santos GR, de Moraes AJG, Cavalcante APS, da Silva GB (2022) First report of leaf anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum chrysophilum on açaí palm (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) in Brazil. Journal of General Plant Pathology 88: 212–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-022-01059-4
  • Doyle VP, Oudemans PV, Rehner SA, Litt A (2013) Habitat and host indicate lineage identity in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides s.l. from wild and agricultural landscapes in North America. PLoS ONE 8: e62394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062394
  • Echeverrigaray S, Scariot FJ, Fontanella G, Favaron F, Sella L, Santos MC, Schwambach J, Pedrotti C, Delamare APL (2020) Colletotrichum species causing grape ripe rot disease in Vitis labrusca and V. vinifera varieties in the highlands of southern Brazil. Plant Pathology 69: 1504–1512. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13240
  • Evallo E, Taguiam JD, Balendres MA (2022) Colletotrichum fructicola associated with fruit anthracnose of persimmon. Journal of Phytopathology 170: 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/JPH.13068
  • Fan R, Xie D, Nie M, Long Y, Zhao Z (2022) Identification and first report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing fruit rot on Ziziphus mauritiana in China. Plant Disease 106: 2751. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-21-2707-PDN
  • Fu DD, Wang W, Qin RF, Zhang R, Sunb GY, Gleason ML (2013) Colletotrichum fructicola, first record of bitter rot of apple in China. Mycotaxon 126: 23–30. https://doi.org/10.5248/126.23
  • Fu M, Crous PW, Bai Q, Zhang PF, Xiang J, Guo YS, Zhao FF, Yang MM, Hong N, Xu WX, Wang GP (2019) Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose of Pyrus spp. in China. Persoonia. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 42: 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2019.42.01
  • Fuentes-Aragón D, Juárez-Vázquez SB, Vargas-Hernández M, Silva-Rojas HV (2018) Colletotrichum fructicola, a member of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides sensu lato, is the causal agent of anthracnose and soft rot in avocado fruits cv. ‘Hass’. Mycobiology 46: 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/12298093.2018.1454010
  • Fuentes-Aragón D, Guarnaccia V, Rebollar-Alviter A, Juárez-Vázquez SB, Aguirre-Rayo F, Silva-Rojas HV (2020a) Multilocus identification and thiophanate-methyl sensitivity of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex associated with fruit with symptoms and symptomless leaves of mango. Plant Pathology 69: 1125–1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13195
  • Fuentes-Aragón D, Silva-Rojas HV, Guarnaccia V, Mora-Aguilera JA, Aranda-Ocampo S, Bautista-Martínez N, Téliz-Ortiz D (2020b) Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose on avocado fruit in Mexico: Current status. Plant Pathology 69: 1513–1528. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13234
  • Fuentes-Aragón D, Rebollar-Alviter A, Osnaya-González M, Enciso-Maldonado GA, González-Reyes H, Silva-Rojas HV (2021) Multilocus phylogenetic analyses suggest the presence of Colletotrichum chrysophilum causing banana anthracnose in Mexico. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 128: 589–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-020-00396-w
  • Gañán L, Álvarez E, Castaño-Zapata J (2015) Identificación genética de aislamientos de Colletotrichum spp. causantes de antracnosis en frutos de aguacate, banano, mango y tomate de árbol. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 39: 339–347. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.192
  • Glass NL, Donaldson GC (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 1323–1330. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.61.4.1323-1330.1995
  • Gong J, Sun D, Bian N, Wang R, Wang X, Wang X (2023) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing anthracnose on peanut (Arachis hypogaea) in China. Plant Disease 107: 2879. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-22-2480-PDN
  • Guarnaccia V, Gilardi G, Martino I, Garibaldi A, Gullino ML (2019) Species diversity in Colletotrichum causing anthracnose of aromatic and ornamental Lamiaceae in Italy. Agronomy 9: 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9100613
  • Guarnaccia V, Martino I, Gilardi G, Garibaldi A, Gullino ML (2021) Colletotrichum spp. causing anthracnose on ornamental plants in northern Italy. Journal of Plant Pathology 103: 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-020-00684-2
  • Guerber JC, Liu B, Correll JC, Johnston PR (2003) Characterization of diversity in Colletotrichum acutatum sensu lato by sequence analysis of two gene introns, mtDNA and intron RFLPs, and mating compatibility. Mycologia 95: 872–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2004.11833047
  • Han Y, Zeng X, Xiang F, Ren L, Chen FY, Gu YC (2016) Distribution and characteristics of Colletotrichum spp. associated with anthracnose of strawberry in Hubei, China. Plant Disease 100: 996–1006. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-15-1016-RE
  • Han S, Xu X, Jiang Y, Zheng Z, Yuan H, Li S, Liu Y, Lin T, Qiao T, Yang C et al. (2023) Colletotrichum fructicola, causal agent of shot-hole symptoms on leaves of Prunus sibirica in China. Plant Disease 107: 2530. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0848-PDN
  • Harrington B (2005) The Inkscape developer team (2004–2005), Inkscape. http://www.inkscape.org [accessed on 19 January 2025]
  • Hassan O, Kim JS, Romain BBND, Chang T (2022) An account of Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose of Atractylodes ovata in South Korea based on morphology and molecular data. PLoS ONE 17: e0263084. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0263084
  • Hassan O, Shin YU, Lee KS, Lee DW, Chang T (2023) First report of anthracnose on spotted laurel caused by Colletotrichum fructicola in South Korea. Plant Disease 107: 522. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-23-0182-PDN
  • He L, Li X, Gao Y, Li B, Mu W, Liu F (2019) Characterization and fungicide sensitivity of Colletotrichum spp. from different hosts in Shandong, China. Plant Disease 103: 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-18-0597-RE
  • He J, Li DW, Zhu YN, Si YZ, Huang JH, Zhu LH, Ye JR, Huang L (2022) Diversity and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose on Cunninghamia lanceolata. Plant Pathology 71: 1757–1773. https://doi.org/10.1111/PPA.13611
  • He J, Li DW, Bian JY, Zhu LH, Huang L (2023) Unravelling species diversity and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum associated with anthracnose on Osmanthus fragrans in Quanjiao, China. Plant Disease 107: 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0810-RE
  • Henrique Lopes LR, Boiteux LS, Rossato M, Aguiar FM, Fonseca ME, Oliveira VR, Reis A (2021) Diversity of Colletotrichum species causing onion anthracnose in Brazil. European Journal of Plant Pathology 159: 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-020-02166-8
  • Hofer KM, Braithwaite M, Braithwaite LJ, Sorensen S, Siebert B, Pather V, Goudie L, Williamson L, Alexander BJ, Toome-Heller M (2021) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola, C. perseae, and C. siamense causing anthracnose disease of avocado (Persea americana) in New Zealand. Plant Disease 105: 1564. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-20-1313-PDN
  • Hu M, Grabke A, Schnabel G (2015) Investigation of the Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex causing peach anthracnose in South Carolina. Plant Disease 99: 797–805. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-14-1076-RE
  • Huang R, Sun W, Wang L, Li Q, Huang S, Tang L, Guo T, Mo J, Hsiang T (2021a) Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose disease of banana. Plant Pathology 70: 1827–1837. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13426
  • Huang R, Gui Q, Zhang Y, Sun W, Tang L, Huang S, Guo TX, Li Q, Mo JY, Huang H et al. (2022a) Identification and observation of infection processes of Colletotrichum species associated with pearl plum anthracnose in Guangxi, China. Plant Disease 106: 3154–3165. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0765-RE
  • Huang X, Wu Y, Li Y, Lin H, Ma L, Su X, Zhou X (2022b) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing anthracnose on Phoebe sheareri in China. Plant Disease 106: 1994. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-08-21-1841-PDN
  • Huang L, Sheng J, Song W, Zheng D, Song S, Xu X, Yu J, Liu Q, Liu Y, Tang W (2022c) First report of leaf spot caused by Colletotrichum fructicola on kiwifruit in China. Plant Disease 106: 2760. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-22-0120-PDN
  • Huelsenbeck J, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback JP (2001) Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294: 310–2314. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065889
  • Hung N, Hsiao CH, Yang CS, Lin HC, Yeh LK, Fan YC, Sun PL (2020) Colletotrichum keratitis: A rare yet important fungal infection of human eyes. Mycoses 63: 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13058
  • Hyde KD, Noorabadi MT, Thiyagaraja V, He MQ, Johnston PR, Wijesinghe SN, Armand A, Biketova AY, Chethana KWT, Erdoğdu M et al. (2024a) The 2024 Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 15: 5146–6239. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/25
  • Hyde KD, Wijesinghe SN, Afshari N, Aumentado HD, Bhunjun CS, Boonmee S, Camporesi E, Chethana KWT, Doilom M, Dong W et al. (2024b) Mycosphere Notes 469–520. Mycosphere 15: 1294–1454. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/11
  • Ismail AM, El-Ganainy SM (2022) Characterization of Colletotrichum species associating with anthracnose disease of mango in Egypt. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 129: 449–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-021-00538-8
  • Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Ariyawansa HA, Bhat J, Buyck B, Cai L, Dai YC, Abd-Elsalam KA, Ertz D, Hidayat I, Jeewon R, Jones EBG, Bahkali AH, Karunarathna SC, Liu J-K, Luangsa JJ-ard, Lumbsch HT, Maharachchikumbura SSN, McKenzie EHC, Moncalvo J-M, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Nilsson H, Pang K-L, Pereira OL, Phillips AJL, Raspé O, Rollins AW, Romero AI, Etayo J, Selçuk F, Stephenson SL, Suetrong S, Taylor JE, Tsui CKM, Vizzini A, Abdel-Wahab MA, Wen T-C, Boonmee S, Dai DQ, Daranagama DA, Dissanayake AJ, Ekanayaka AH, Fryar SC, Hongsanan S, Jayawardena RS, Li W-J, Perera RH, Phookamsak R, de Silva NI, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Wijayawardene NN, Zhao R-L, Zhao Q, Kang J-C, Promputtha I (2015) The Faces of Fungi database: Fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts. Fungal Diversity 74: 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13225-015-0351-8
  • Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, Damm U, Cai L, Liu M, Li XH, Zhang W, Zhao WS, Yan JY (2016a) Notes on currently accepted species of Colletotrichum. Mycosphere 7: 1192–1260. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/si/2c/9
  • Jayawardena RS, Huang JK, Jin BC, Yan JY, Li XH, Hyde KD, Bahkali AH, Yin SL, Zhang GZ (2016b) An account of Colletotrichum species associated with strawberry anthracnose in China based on morphology and molecular data. Mycosphere 7: 1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/si/2c/6
  • Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, Chen YJ, Papp V, Palla B, Papp D, Bhunjun CS, Hurdeal VG, Senwanna C, Manawasinghe IS et al. (2020) One stop shop IV: taxonomic update with molecular phylogeny for important phytopathogenic genera: 76–100. Fungal Diversity 103: 87–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13225-020-00460-8
  • Jayawardena RS, Bhunjun CS, Hyde KD, Gentekaki E, Itthayakorn P (2021a) Colletotrichum: Lifestyles, biology, morpho-species, species complexes and accepted species. Mycosphere 12: 519–669. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/7
  • Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, de Farias ARG, Bhunjun CS, Ferdinandez HS, Manamgoda DS, Udayanga D, Herath IS, Thambugala KM, Manawasinghe IS, Gajanayake AJ, Samarakoon BC, Bundhun D, Gomdola D, Huanraluek N, Sun Y-r, Tang X, Promputtha I, Thines M (2021b) What is a species in fungal plant pathogens? Fungal Diversity 109: 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13225-021-00484-8
  • Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, Wang S, Sun YR, Suwannarach N, Sysouphanthong P, Abdel-Wahab MA, Abdel-Aziz FA, Abeywickrama PD, Abreu VP, Armand A, Aptroot A, Bao D-F, Begerow D, Bellanger J-M, Bezerra JDP, Bundhun D, Calabon MS, Cao T, Cantillo T, JL Carvalho VR, Chaiwan N, Chen C-C, Courtecuisse R, Cui B-K, Damm U, Denchev CM, Denchev TT, Deng CY, Devadatha B, de Silva NI, dos Santos LA, Dubey NK, Dumez S, Ferdinandez HS, Firmino AL, Gafforov Y, Gajanayake AJ, Gomdola D, Gunaseelan S, Shucheng-He, Htet ZH, Kaliyaperumal M, Kemler M, Kezo K, Kularathnage ND, Leonardi M, Li J-P, Liao C, Liu S, Loizides M, Luangharn T, Ma J, Madrid H, Mahadevakumar S, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Manamgoda DS, Martín MP, Mekala N, Moreau P-A, Mu Y-H, Pahoua P, Pem D, Pereira OL, Phonrob W, Phukhamsakda C, Raza M, Ren G-C, Rinaldi AC, Rossi W, Samarakoon BC, Samarakoon MC, Sarma VV, Senanayake IC, Singh A, Souza MF, Souza-Motta CM, Spielmann AA, Su W, Tang X, XingGuo Tian, Thambugala KM, Thongklang N, Tennakoon DS, Wannathes N, DingPeng Wei, Welti S, Wijesinghe SN, Yang H, Yang Y, Yuan H-S, Zhang H, Zhang J, Balasuriya A, Bhunjun CS, Bulgakov TS, Cai L, Camporesi E, Chomnunti P, Deepika YS, Doilom M, Duan W-J, Han S-L, Huanraluek N, Jones EBG, Lakshmidevi N, Li Y, Lumyong S, Luo Z-L, Khuna S, Kumla J, Manawasinghe IS, Mapook A, Punyaboon W, Tibpromma S, Lu Y-Z, JiYe Y, Yong (2022) Fungal diversity notes 1512–1610: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 117: 1–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-022-00513-0
  • Jian Y, Li Y, Tang G, Zheng X, Khaskheli MI, Gong G (2021) Identification of Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose disease of strawberry in Sichuan Province, China. Plant Disease 105: 3025–3036. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-20-2114-RE
  • Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD (2019) MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20: 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/BIB/BBX108
  • Khodadadi F, González JB, Martin PL, Giroux E, Bilodeau GJ, Peter KA, Doyle VP, Aćimović SG (2020) Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum species causing apple bitter rot in New York and description of C. noveboracense sp. nov. Scientific Reports 10: 11043. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66761-9
  • Kim CH, Hassan O, Chang T (2020) Diversity, pathogenicity, and fungicide sensitivity of Colletotrichum species associated with apple anthracnose in South Korea. Plant Disease 104: 2866–2874. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-20-0050-RE
  • Kuang W, Cui R, Xiang M, Liu B, Wang Z, Guo D, Ma J (2021) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing anthracnose on loquat in Jiangxi province, China. Journal of Plant Pathology 103: 1053–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-021-00858-6
  • Li HN, Jiang JJ, Hong N, Wang GP, Xu WX (2013) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing bitter rot of pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) in China. Plant Disease 97: 1000. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-13-0084-PDN
  • Li PL, Liu D, Gong GS, Chen SR, Yang XX (2016) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing anthracnose on Aucuba japonica in Sichuan Province of China. Plant Disease 100: 1019. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-15-1088-PDN
  • Li Q, Bu J, Shu J, Yu ZH, Tang L, Huang S, Guo TX, Mo JY, Luo SM, Solangi GS, Hsiang T (2019) Colletotrichum species associated with mango in southern China. Scientific Reports 9: 18891. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54809-4
  • Li SC, Xiao LH, Wu F, Wang YB, Jia MS, Chen M, Chen JY, Xiang ML (2022a) First report of leaf spot caused by Colletotrichum fructicola on Myrica rubra in China. Plant Disease 106: 1993. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-21-2138-PDN
  • Li P, Zhu JZ, Li XG, Zhong J (2022b) Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum fructicola and Colletotrichum siamense causing anthracnose on luffa sponge gourd in China. Plants 11: 1537. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11121537
  • Li F, Chen J, Chen Q, Liu Z, Sun J, Yan Y, Zhang H, Bi Y (2023a) Identification, pathogenicity, and sensitivity to fungicide of Colletotrichum species that cause walnut anthracnose in Beijing. Agronomy 13: 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010214
  • Liang L, Li S, Han S, Qiao T, Li S, Zhu T (2023) First report of Colletotrichum endophyticum, a causal agent of leaf spot of Bauhinia blakeana, in Southwest China. Plant Disease 107: 956. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-22-1230-PDN
  • Liao C, Doilom M, Jeewon R, Hyde KD, Manawasinghe IS, Chethana KW, Balasuriya A, Thakshila SAD, Luo M, Mapook A, Htet ZH (2025) Challenges and update on fungal endophytes: Classification, definition, diversity, ecology, evolution and functions. Fungal Diversity 131: 301–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-025-00550-5
  • Lima NB, de A Batista MV, De Morais MA, Barbosa MA, Michereff SJ, Hyde KD, Câmara MP (2013) Five Colletotrichum species are responsible for mango anthracnose in northeastern Brazil. Fungal Diversity 61: 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0237-6
  • Lima NB, Lima WG, Tovar-Pedraza JM, Michereff SJ, Câmara MP (2015) Comparative epidemiology of Colletotrichum species from mango in northeastern Brazil. European Journal of Plant Pathology 141: 679–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-014-0570-y
  • Lin SR, Lin YH, Ariyawansa HA, Chang YC, Yu SY, Tsai I, Chung CL, Hung TH (2023a) Analysis of the pathogenicity and phylogeny of Colletotrichum species associated with brown blight of tea (Camellia sinensis) in Taiwan. Plant Disease 107: 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-22-0509-RE
  • Lin WL, Duan CH, Wang CL (2023b) Identification and virulence of Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose on mango. Plant Pathology 72: 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/PPA.13682
  • Lisboa DO, Silva MA, Pinho DB, Pereira OL, Furtado GQ (2018) Diversity of pathogenic and endophytic Colletotrichum isolates from Licania tomentosa in Brazil. Forest Pathology 48: e12448. https://doi.org/10.1111/EFP.12448
  • Liu F, Weir BS, Damm U, Crous PW, Wang Y, Liu B, Wang M, Zhang M, Cai L (2015) Unravelling Colletotrichum species associated with Camellia: Employing ApMat and GS loci to resolve species in the C. gloeosporioides complex. Persoonia. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 35: 63–86. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158515X687597
  • Liu F, Tang GT, Zheng XJ, Li Y, Sun XF, Qi XB, Zhou Y, Xu J, Chen HB, Chang XL et al. (2016) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose disease in peppers from Sichuan Province, China. Scientific Reports 6: 32761. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32761
  • Liu X, Shi T, Li B, Cai J, Li C, Huang G (2018) Colletotrichum species associated with cassava anthracnose in China. Journal of Phytopathology 167: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12765
  • Liu F, Ma ZY, Hou LW, Diao YZ, Wu WP, Damm U, Song S, Cai L (2022) Updating species diversity of Colletotrichum, with a phylogenomics overview. Studies in Mycology 101: 1–56. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2022.101.01
  • Lu Q, Wang Y, Li N, Ni D, Yang Y, Wang X (2018) Differences in the characteristics and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum camelliae and C. fructicola isolated from the tea plant (Camellia sinensis). Frontiers in Microbiology 9: 3060. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03060
  • Ma X, Nontachaiyapoom S, Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, Gentekaki E, Zhou S, Qian Y, Wen T, Kang J (2018) Endophytic Colletotrichum species from Dendrobium spp. in China and Northern Thailand. MycoKeys 43: 23–57. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.43.25081
  • Machado SDC, Veloso JS, Câmara MP, Campos F, Sarmento RDA, Giongo MV, dos Santos GR (2021) First report of Colletotrichum chrysophillum causing cassava anthracnose in Brazil. Plant Disease 105: 1196. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-20-1925-PDN
  • Manamgoda DS, Udayanga D, Cai L, Chukeatirote E, Hyde KD (2013) Endophytic Colletotrichum from tropical grasses with a new species C. endophytica. Fungal Diversity 61: 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0256-3
  • Manawasinghe IS, Calabon MS, Jones EBG, Zhang YX, Liao CF, Xiong Y, Chaiwan N, Kularathnage ND, Liu NG, Tang SM et al. (2022) Mycosphere notes 345–386. Mycosphere 13: 454–557. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/3
  • Mangwende E, Truter M, Aveling TAS, Chirwa PW (2021) Anthracnose leaf spot pathogens, Colletotrichum fructicola and Colletotrichum cigarro, associated with Eucalyptus seed produced in South Africa. Australasian Plant Pathology 50: 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-021-00807-y
  • Marin-Felix Y, Groenewald JZ, Cai L, Chen Q, Marincowitz S, Barnes I, Bensch K, Braun U, Camporesi E, Damm U et al. (2017) Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 1. Studies in Mycology 86: 99–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SIMYCO.2017.04.002
  • Marquez-Zequera I, Cruz-Lachica I, Ley-Lopez N, Carrillo-Facio JA, Osuna-Garcia LA, Garcia-Estrada RS (2018) First report of Carica papaya fruit anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum fructicola in Mexico. Plant Disease 102: 2649. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0736-PDN
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the 2011 TeraGrid Conference: Extreme Digital Discovery, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2016741.2016785
  • Moreira RR, Peres NA, May De Mio LL (2019) Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides species complexes associated with apple in Brazil. Plant Disease 103: 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-18-1187-RE
  • Munir M, Amsden B, Dixon E, Vaillancourt L, Gauthier NW (2016) Characterization of Colletotrichum species causing bitter rot of apple in Kentucky orchards. Plant Disease 100: 2194–2203. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-15-1144-RE
  • Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Niu X, Gao H, Qi J, Chen M, Tao A, Xu J, Dai Z, Su J (2016a) Colletotrichum species associated with Jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) anthracnose in southeastern China. Scientific Reports 6: 25179. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25179
  • Niu XP, Gao H, Chen Y, Qi JM (2016b) First report of anthracnose on white Jute (Corchorus capsularis) caused by Colletotrichum fructicola and C. siamense in China. Plant Disease 100: 1243. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-15-1418-PDN
  • Noor N, Zakaria L (2018) Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum spp. associated with chili anthracnose in peninsular Malaysia. European Journal of Plant Pathology 151: 961–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-018-1431-x
  • Norphanphoun C, Hyde KD (2023) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola, C. rhizophorae sp. nov., and C. thailandica sp. nov. on mangrove in Thailand. Pathogens 12: 1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12121436
  • Numponsak T, Kumla J, Suwannarach N, Matsui K, Lumyong S (2018) Biosynthetic pathway and optimal conditions for the production of indole-3-acetic acid by an endophytic fungus, Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109. PLoS ONE 13: e0205070. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205070
  • O’Connell RJ, Thon MR, Hacquard S, Amyotte SG, Kleemann J, Torres MF, Damm U, Buiate EA, Epstein L, Alkan N et al. (2012) Lifestyle transitions in plant pathogenic Colletotrichum fungi deciphered by genome and transcriptome analyses. Nature Genetics 44: 1060–1065. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2372
  • Oo MM, Yoon HY, Jang HA, Oh SK (2018) Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with bitter rot disease of apple in South Korea. Plant Pathology 34: 480–489. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.FT.10.2018.0201
  • Pacheco-Esteva MC, Soto-Castro D, Vásquez-López A, Lima NB, Tovar-Pedraza JM (2022) First report of Colletotrichum chrysophilum causing papaya anthracnose in Mexico. Plant Disease 106: 3213. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-22-0681-PDN
  • Paniz-Mondolfi AE, Agemy S, Cañete-Gibas C, Gitman MR, Iacob CE, Necula I, Wang CY, Delgado Noguera LA, Sanders C, Wiederhold NP et al. (2021) First report of human infection caused by Colletotrichum chlorophyti occurring in a post-corneal transplant patient with endophthalmitis. Medical Mycology Case Reports 32: 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mmcr.2021.04.002
  • Park MS, Kim BR, Park IH, Hahm SS (2018) First report of two Colletotrichum species associated with bitter rot on apple fruit in Korea – C. fructicola and C. siamense. Journal of Plant Pathology 46: 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/12298093.2018.1478220
  • Poti T, Kisaki G, Arita K, Akimitsu K (2023) Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum species causing kiwifruit anthracnose in Kagawa Prefecture, Japan. Journal of General Plant Pathology 89: 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-023-01115-7
  • Prihastuti H, Cai L, Chen H, McKenzie EHC, Hyde KD (2009) Characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with coffee berries in northern Thailand. Fungal Diversity 39: 89–109.
  • Promputtha I, Lumyong S, Dhanasekaran V, McKenzie EHC, Hyde KD, Jeewon R (2007) A phylogenetic evaluation of whether endophytes become saprotrophs at host senescence. Microbial Ecology 53: 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9117-x
  • Qing Z, Xiao D, Chen H, Shen Y, Pan L, Wen R (2020) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing anthracnose on Crinum asiaticum in Guangxi province, China. Journal of Plant Pathology 102: 971. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42161-020-00537-Y
  • Qiu L, Liu J, Kuang W, Cui R, Zhang L, Ma J (2022) First report of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum fructicola on Loropetalum chinense in China. Plant Disease 106: 1994. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-21-1531-PDN
  • Rambaut A, Drummond A (2014) FigTree V1. 3.1. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh.
  • Rojas EI, Rehner SA, Samuels GJ, Van Bael SA, Herre EA, Cannon P, Chen R, Pang J, Wang RW, Zhang Y et al. (2010) Colletotrichum gloeosporioides s.l. associated with Theobroma cacao and other plants in Panamá: Multilocus phylogenies distinguish host-associated pathogens from asymptomatic endophytes. Mycologia 102: 1318–1338. https://doi.org/10.3852/09-244
  • Ruiz-Campos C, Umaña-Rojas G, Gómez-Alpízar L (2022) Identificación multilocus de especies de Colletotrichum asociadas a la antracnosis de papaya. Agronomía Mesoamericana 33: 45495. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v33i1.45495
  • Santos de Oliveira SA, da Silva LL, Nascimento DDS, Alves Silva Diamantino MS, Ferreira CF, Santos de Oliveira TA (2020) Colletotrichum species causing cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) anthracnose in different eco-zones within the Reconcavo region of Bahia, Brazil. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 127: 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-020-00327-9
  • Seifollahi E, de Farias ARG, Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD (2023) Taxonomic advances from fungal flora associated with ferns and fern-like hosts in Northern Thailand. Plants 12: 683. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030683
  • Senanayake IC, Rathnayaka AR, Marasinghe DS, Calabon MS, Gentekaki E, Lee HB, Hurdeal VG, Pem D, Dissanayake LS, Wijesinghe SN, Bundhun D, Nguyen TT, Goonasekara ID, Abeywickrama PD, Bhunjun CS, Jayawardena RS, Wanasinghe DN, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, Xiang MM (2020) Morphological approaches in studying fungi: Collection, examination, isolation, sporulation, and preservation. Mycosphere 11: 2678–2754. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20
  • Serrato-Diaz LM, Rivera-Vargas LI, Goenaga R, Navarro ED, French-Monar RD (2017) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola and C. queenslandicum causing fruit rot of rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum). Plant Disease 101: 1043. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-16-1557-PDN
  • Serrato-Diaz LM, Mariño YA, Bayman P (2020) Pathogens causing anthracnose and fruit rots of coffee associated with the coffee berry borer and the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana in Puerto Rico. Phytopathology 110: 1541–1552. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-02-20-0057-R
  • Sharma G, Kumar N, Weir BS, Hyde KD, Shenoy BD (2013) The ApMat marker can resolve Colletotrichum species: A case study with Mangifera indica. Fungal Diversity 61: 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13225-013-0247-4
  • Sharma G, Maymon M, Freeman S (2017) Epidemiology, pathology, and identification of Colletotrichum including a novel species associated with avocado (Persea americana) anthracnose in Israel. Scientific Reports 7: 15839. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15946-w
  • Shi NN, Du YX, Chen FR, Ruan HC, Yang XJ (2017) First report of leaf spot caused by Colletotrichum fructicola on Japanese Fatsia (Fatsia japonica) in Fujian Province, China. Plant Disease 101: 1552. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-16-1720-PDN
  • Shi NN, Du YX, Ruan HC, Yang XJ, Dai YL, Gan L, Chen FR (2018) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing anthracnose on Camellia sinensis in Guangdong Province, China. Plant Disease 102: 241. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-17-0705-PDN
  • Shu J, Guo T, Li Q, Tang L, Huang S, Mo J, Yu Z, Forte-Perri V (2021) First report of leaf spot caused by Colletotrichum fructicola and C. siamense on Ziziphus mauritiana in Guangxi, China. Plant Disease 105: 2021. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-20-1863-PDN
  • Silva-Cabral JRA, da Silva JL, Soares LDS, Costa JFO, Amorim EDR, Lima GDA, Assunção IP (2019) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola and C. tropicale causing anthracnose on orchids in Brazil. Plant Disease 103: 2672. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-19-0518-PDN
  • Soares MG, Alves E, Silveira AL, Pereira FD, Guimarães SS (2021) Colletotrichum siamense is the main aetiological agent of anthracnose of avocado in south-eastern Brazil. Plant Pathology 70: 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/PPA.13262
  • Song L, Lin W, Jiang N, Zhang Z, Tan G, Wei S (2021) Anthracnose disease of Amomum villosum caused by Colletotrichum fructicola in China. Journal of General Plant Pathology 87: 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-021-00999-7
  • Sui XN, Guo MJ, Wang QT, Wang HQ, Zhou H, Huang XB, Yu ZF, Hou CL (2024) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Colletotrichum on important forest plants in China. Mycosphere 15: 4569–4743. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/19
  • Sun JW, Si YZ, Li DW, Jin GQ, Zhu LH (2020) First report of leaf blotch of Aesculus chinensis caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Colletotrichum fructicola in China. Plant Disease 104: 3065. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-20-0841-PDN
  • Taheri H, Javan-Nikkhah M, Elahinia SA, Khodaparast SA, Golmohammadi M (2016) Species of Colletotrichum associated with citrus trees in Iran. Mycologia Iranica 3: 1–14.
  • Tan Q, Schnabel G, Chaisiri C, Yin LF, Yin WX, Luo CX (2022) Colletotrichum species associated with peaches in China. Journal of Fungi 8: 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030313
  • Tang Z, Lou J, He L, Wang Q, Chen L, Zhong X, Wu C, Zhang L, Wang ZQ (2022) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing anthracnose on cherry (Prunus avium) in China. Plant Disease 106: 317. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-21-0544-PDN
  • Tang XY, Zhou ZC, Hu S, Zhu WY, Wu XP, Ding HX, Peng LJ (2023) First report of anthracnose on Tetrapanax papyrifer caused by Colletotrichum fructicola in China. Plant Disease 107: 2246. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-22-2366-PDN
  • Than PP, Prihastuti H, Phoulivong S, Taylor PWJ, Hyde KD (2008a) Chilli anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum species. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B 9: 764–788. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0860007
  • Than PP, Jeewon R, Hyde KD, Pongsupasamit S, Mongkolporn O, Taylor PWJ (2008b) Characterization and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose on chilli (Capsicum spp.) in Thailand. Plant Pathology 57: 562–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-3059.2007.01782.X
  • Tovar-Pedraza JM, Mora-Aguilera JA, Nava-Díaz C, Lima NB, Michereff SJ, Sandoval-Islas JS, Câmara MPS, Téliz-Ortiz D, Leyva-Mir SG (2020) Distribution and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species associated with mango anthracnose in Mexico. Plant Disease 104: 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-19-0178-RE
  • Velho AC, Alaniz S, Casanova L, Mondino P, Stadnik MJ (2015) New insights into the characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with apple diseases in southern Brazil and Uruguay. Fungal Biology 119: 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2014.12.009
  • Velho A, Mondino P, Stadnik MJ (2018) Extracellular enzymes of Colletotrichum fructicola isolates associated with apple bitter rot and Glomerella leaf spot. Mycology 9: 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2018.1464525
  • Veloso JS, Câmara MP, Lima WG, Michereff SJ, Doyle VP (2018) Why species delimitation matters for fungal ecology: Colletotrichum diversity on wild and cultivated cashew in Brazil. Fungal Biology 122: 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2018.03.005
  • Veloso JS, Lima WG, Reis A, Doyle VP, Michereff SJ, Câmara MP (2021) Factors influencing biological traits and aggressiveness of Colletotrichum species associated with cashew anthracnose in Brazil. Plant Pathology 70: 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/PPA.13276
  • Vieira WA, Lima WG, Nascimento ES, Michereff SJ, Câmara MP, Doyle VP (2017) The impact of phenotypic and molecular data on the inference of Colletotrichum diversity associated with Musa. Mycologia 109: 912–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2017.1418577
  • Vieira WADS, Veloso JS, Silva A, Nunes ADS, Doyle VP, Castlebury LA, Câmara MPS (2022) Elucidating the Colletotrichum spp. diversity responsible for papaya anthracnose in Brazil. Fungal Biology 126: 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2022.08.001
  • Vithanage IK, Yakandawala DMD, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Jayasinghe L, Adikaram NKD (2021) Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose disease in Anthurium andraeanum, manifested as spathe rot also in addition to spadix rot and leaf spot. European Journal of Plant Pathology 161: 837–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10658-021-02366-w
  • Wan Y, Jin GQ, Li DW, Wu S, Zhu LH (2022) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing leaf spots on Liriodendron chinense × tulipifera in China. Forest Pathology 52: e12779. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12779
  • Wang YC, Hao XY, Wang L, Xiao B, Wang XC, Yang YJ (2016a) Diverse Colletotrichum species cause anthracnose of tea plants (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) in China. Scientific Reports 6: 35287. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35287
  • Wang HC, Huang YF, Chen Q, Wang MS, Xia HQ, Shang SH, Zhang CQ (2016b) Anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum fructicola on tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) in China. Plant Disease 100: 1235. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-15-0724-PDN
  • Wang Y, Chen JY, Xu X, Cheng J, Zheng L, Huang J, Li DW (2020) Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose disease of Camellia oleifera in China. Plant Disease 104: 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-18-1955-RE
  • Wang S, Huang J, Zheng M, Wang Y, Yuan Q, Gao Q, Zhou H (2022) First report of anthracnose on Bletilla striata caused by Colletotrichum fructicola in China. Plant Disease 106: 756. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-21-1008-PDN
  • Weir BS, Johnston PR, Damm U (2012) The Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex. Studies in Mycology 73: 115–180. https://doi.org/10.3114/SIM0011
  • Wenneker M, Pham KTK, Kerkhof E, Harteveld DOC (2021) First report of preharvest fruit rot of ‘pink lady’ apples caused by Colletotrichum fructicola in Italy. Plant Disease 105: 1561. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-20-2404-PDN
  • Wu CJ, Chen HK, Ni HF (2020) Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with mango anthracnose in Taiwan. European Journal of Plant Pathology 157: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10658-020-01964-4
  • Wu J, Wang H, Fang L, Xie X, Wang L (2021) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola and Colletotrichum nymphaeae causing leaf spot on Rubus corchorifolius in Zhejiang Province, China. Plant Disease 105: 3746. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-21-0198-PDN
  • Wynns AA, Jensen AB, Eilenberg J, Delalibera Jr I (2019) Colletotrichum nymphaeae var. entomophilum var. nov., a natural enemy of the citrus scale insect, Praelongorthezia praelonga (Hemiptera: Ortheziidae). Scientia Agrícola 77: e20180269. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2018-0269
  • Xie J, Chen Y, Cai G, Cai R, Hu Z, Wang H (2023) Tree Visualization By One Table (tvBOT): A web application for visualizing, modifying and annotating phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Research 51: W587–W592. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad359
  • Xu MT, Li P, Meng HB, Liu JF, Wu XL, Gong GS, Chen H, Shang J, Yang WY, Chang XL (2023) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing anthracnose on Glycine max in China. Plant Disease 107: 2240. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-22-2222-PDN
  • Xue L, Zhang L, Yang XX, Huang X, Wu W, Zhou X, White JF, Liu Y, Li C (2019) Characterization, phylogenetic analyses, and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species on Morus alba in Sichuan Province, China. Plant Disease 103: 2624–2633. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-18-0938-RE
  • Yang Z, Mo J, Guo T, Li Q, Tang L, Huang S, Wei J, Hsiang T (2021) First report of Colletotrichum fructicola causing anthracnose on Pouteria campechiana in China. Plant Disease 105: 708. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-20-0253-PDN
  • Yang HD, Wei DP, Bhunjun CS, Zeng XY, Zhao Q, Jayawardena RS (2023) Morphology and phylogeny of Colletotrichum dioscoreicola sp. nov. related to anthracnose disease on Dioscorea yunnanensis (Yam) in China. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 13: 412–425. https://doi.org/10.5943/cream/13/1/15
  • Yin Q, Shi X, Zhu Z, Wang Y, Tian L, Sang Z, Jia Z, Ma L (2022) First report of leaf spot caused by Colletotrichum fructicola on Magnolia wufengensis in Hubei, China. Plant Disease 106: 2987. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-21-2811-PDN
  • Yokosawa S, Eguchi N, Kondo KI, Sato T (2017) Phylogenetic relationship and fungicide sensitivity of members of the Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex from apple. Journal of General Plant Pathology 83: 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-017-0732-9
  • Yu L, Lan G, Yang Y, Tang Y, Li Z, She X, He Z (2022a) First report of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum fructicola on Brassica parachinensis in China. Crop Protection (Guildford, Surrey) 154: 105842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105842
  • Zapata M, Rodríguez-Serrano E, Castro JF, Santelices C, Carrasco-Fernández J, Damm U, Palfner G (2024) Novel species and records of Colletotrichum associated with native woody plants in south-central Chile. Mycological Progress 23: 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11557-024-01956-2
  • Zhang PF, Zhai LF, Zhang XK, Huang XZ, Hong N, Xu W, Wang G (2015) Characterization of Colletotrichum fructicola, a new causal agent of leaf black spot disease of sandy pear (Pyrus pyrifolia). European Journal of Plant Pathology 143: 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-015-0715-7
  • Zhang Q, Nizamani MM, Feng Y, Yang YQ, Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, Wang Y, Li C (2023a) Genome-scale and multi-gene phylogenetic analyses of Colletotrichum spp. host preference and associated with medicinal plants. Mycosphere 14: 1–106. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/14/si2/1
  • Zhang YX, Chen JW, Manawasinghe IS, Lin YH, Jayawardena RS, McKenzie EHC, Hyde KD, Xiang MM (2023b) Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with ornamental plants in Southern China. Mycosphere 14: 262–302. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/14/si2/5
  • Zhang M, Sun W, Li Q, Tang L, Huang S, Guo T, Mo J, Huang H (2023c) Anthracnose of Philodendron bipinnatifidum caused by Colletotrichum karsti and C. endophytica in Guangxi, China. Plant Disease 107: 576. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-21-2236-PDN
  • Zhang M, Forte-Perri V, Sun W, Tang L, Huang S, Guo T, Chen X, Li Q (2023d) Identification and observation of infection processes of Colletotrichum species associated with persimmon anthracnose in Guangxi, China. Plant Disease 107: 1670–1679. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-22-1372-SR
  • Zhao J, Liu T, Zhang DP, Wu HL, Pan LQ, Liao NY, Liu WC (2021) First report of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum siamense and C. fructicola of Camellia chrysantha in China. Plant Disease 105: 2020. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-20-2324-PDN
  • Zhao J, Yu Z, Li Q, Tang L, Guo T, Huang S, Mo J, Hsiang T (2022) Leaf spot caused by Colletotrichum fructicola on star anise (Illicium verum) in China. Plant Disease 106: 1060. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-21-0685-PDN
  • Zheng XR, Zhang MJ, Shang XL, Fang SZ, Chen FM (2021) Etiology of Cyclocarya paliurus Anthracnose in Jiangsu Province, China. Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 613499. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.613499
  • Zhou X, Li M, Rao B, Chen Y, Cai C, Gao H (2020) First report of anthracnose on Paris polyphylla var. chinensis caused by Colletotrichum fructicola in northern Fujian, China. Plant Disease 104: 2728. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-20-0693-PDN

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Isolates and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers

Deecksha Gomdola, Rajesh Jeewon, Eric H.C. McKenzie, Ruvishika S. Jayawardena, Fatimah Al-Otibi, Xia Tang, Yong Wang, Kevin D. Hyde, Li Fu

Data type: xlsx

Explanation note: Type, ex-type, and reference spe-cies are denoted with T. Our isolates are in bold font.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (55.57 kb)
login to comment