Research Article
Print
Research Article
Unveiling species diversity within early-diverging fungi from China V: Five new species of Absidia (Cunninghamellaceae, Mucoromycota)
expand article infoXin-Yu Ji, Zi-Ying Ding, Yong Nie§, Heng Zhao§, Shi Wang, Bo Huang|, Xiao-Yong Liu
‡ Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
§ Anhui University of Technology, Anhui, China
| Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China
¶ Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Open Access

Abstract

Absidia is widely distributed in soil, koji, and various types of feces. A multi-locus phylogeny covering the small subunit (SSU), internal transcribed spacer (ITS), and large subunit of ribosomal RNA gene (LSU rDNA), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1α), and actin (Act), combined with morphological characteristics, revealed five new species in this genus. This study provides their descriptions and illustrations and discusses their differences from morphological allies and phylogenetic relatives. Absidia collariata sp. nov. is distinguished from other species in terms of the length of collars. A. hainanensis sp. nov. is named after the geographical location Hainan, distinctive with a higher maximum growing temperature. A. pyriformis sp. nov. is different from other species in terms of sporangial shape. A. tardiva sp. nov. is characterized by slow growth. And A. tibetensis sp. nov. is named after the geographical location Tibet and differentiated by more ampulliform swellings. This study further enriches the species diversity of Absidia as the latest discovery of early-diverging fungi in China.

Key words:

Fungal diversity, molecular phylogeny, Mucorales, soil-borne fungi, taxonomy

Introduction

Absidia Tiegh. belongs to Mucoromycota, Mucoromycotina, Mucoromycetes, Mucorales, and Cunninghamellaceae (http://www.indexfungorum.org/, accessed on 1 November 2024). This genus was founded in 1876 and typified by A. reflexa Tiegh (Tieghem 1878). This genus is ubiquitous and widely distributed (Zhang et al. 2018; Crous et al. 2020; Hurdeal et al. 2021; Urquhart and Idnurm 2021; Zhao et al. 2021b; Zhao et al. 2022a); for example, the Czech Republic (688 records), Australia (862), Estonia (1621), Lithuania (422), Italy (372), South Africa (198), and Argentina (515) (https://www.gbif.org/, accessed on 2 November 2024). Absidia are most frequently encountered in July, August, and September, and relatively high temperatures favor Absidia members (https://www.gbif.org/, accessed on 2 November 2024). In China, they are mainly found in tropical regions such as Yunnan and Hainan provinces. They are occasionally isolated in places with low temperatures, such as Tibet and Jilin (Zhao et al. 2022a). The species of Absidia are usually isolated mainly in soil samples. They are also found in plant debris, herbivorous feces, decaying substrates, and air (Lima et al. 2020). The genus Absidia is very important in industry and medicine because it produces steroids, laccases, fatty acids, and other useful substances (Davoust and Persson 1992; Kristanti et al. 2016; Zhao et al. 2021b). Absidia is also frequently used in biotransformation of various natural products, including reduction reactions, hydroxylation, and glycosylation (Zhao et al. 2022a). Moreover, Absidia plays a vital role as the causative agent for human mucormycoses (Constantinides et al. 2008). And it is a contaminant in wine production (Zhao et al. 2022a).

Currently, there are 139 records of Absidia species, variants, and subspecies in the Index Fungorum database (http://www.indexfungorum.org/, accessed November 2, 2024). Absidia usually produces erect or slightly bent sporangia. There is a septum under sporangia. The sporangia are mostly nearly spherical to pyriform, deliquescent-walled, and multi-spored. Sporangiophores arise singly or in whorls. A small protuberance sometimes appears at the apex of columellae. Collars are evident if present. And zygospores have many appendages (Tieghem 1878; Guan et al. 2021; Zhao et al. 2021b; Zong et al. 2021).

Over the past few years, Absidia has experienced a rapid influx of proposed new species. (Lima et al. 2020; Zong et al. 2021; Cordeiro et al. 2020; Zhao et al. 2023). In this paper, five new species, A. collariata sp. nov., A. hainanensis sp. nov., A. pyriformis sp. nov., A. tardiva sp. nov., and A. tibetensis sp. nov., are described from the soils in Yunnan Province, Hainan Province, and Tibet, based on evidence of molecular phylogeny, morphogenetic characteristics, and maximum growth temperature. This is the fifth report of a serial work on the diversity of Chinese early-diverging fungi (Tao et al. 2024; Wang et al. 2024; Zhao et al. 2024; Ding et al. 2025).

Materials and methods

Isolation and morphology

In 2024, soil samples were collected from Yunnan, Tibet, and Hainan in China, following the methods of Yu Li and his colleagues (Liu et al. 2019; Zou et al. 2022). Each sample (approximately 50 g) was placed in a sterile Whirl-Pack plastic bag, labeled with a number, date, vegetation type, altitude, latitude, and longitude. All samples were preserved at 4 °C upon delivery to the laboratory. By combining soil dilution plate and moist-chamber culture methods, pure strains were isolated from soil samples (Constantinides et al. 2008; Kristanti et al. 2016; Zhao et al. 2021a). About 1 g of soil was put into a 10 mL centrifuge tube with 10 mL of sterile water and shaken on a shaker for 25 minutes to prepare a soil suspension. One milliliter of the starting suspension was transferred into 9 mL of sterile water to obtain a 10-2 soil suspension. The above steps were repeated to get 10-3 and 10-4 soil suspensions. Approximately 200 μL of the 10-3 and 10-4 soil suspensions were pipetted onto the Rose Bengal Chloramphenicol agar (RBC: peptone 5.00 g/L, KH2PO4 1.00 g/L, MgSO4·7H2O 0.50 g/L, Rose Bengal 0.05 g/L, glucose 10.00 g/L, chloramphenicol 0.10 g/L, agar 15.00 g/L) and dispersed evenly with a sterilized triangular glass coating rod. The plates were cultivated at 26 °C in the dark for 2–5 days (Corry et al. 1995). Subsequently, the hyphae at the edge of the colony were transferred to a potato dextrose agar (PDA: glucose 100 g, potato 1000 g, agar 100 g, sterilized water 5000 mL, and pH 7). Upon colony forming, a macro shot was taken with a digital camera (Canon PowerShot G7X, Canon, Tokyo, Japan). For the moist chamber, 1 g of soil was evenly sprinkled onto the surface of PDA plates, sealed with Parafilm, and cultivated inverted at 26 °C away from light. After three days, the purification of target strains was performed using an inoculation ring streak. After two days, the agar with hyphae located at the edge of the colony was transferred to a new potato dextrose agar and cultivated as above. Microscopic morphological characteristics of fungi were observed with a stereoscope (SZX10, OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan) and a light microscope (BX53, OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan) and photographed with a high-definition color digital camera (DP80, OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan). Structural measurements were performed using Digimizer software (v5.6.0), and each trait (sporangiospores, stolons, apophyses, and so on) was measured 25 or more times. A gradient method was used to determine its maximum growth temperature (Hoffmann et al. 2007; Hoffmann and Voigt 2009; Hoffmann 2010). Cultured colonies were incubated at 25 °C for two days, and then the temperature was increased by one degree Celsius per day until no further growth was observed. This temperature was recorded as the maximum growth temperature. All strains were stored in 10% sterilized glycerin at -20 °C and preserved in the Shandong Normal University Culture Collection (XG). The living ex-holotype cultures were stored in the China Microbiological Culture Collection Center, Beijing, China (CGMCC). Dry cultures of holotypes were submitted to the Herbarium Mycologicum Academiae Sinicae, Beijing, China (HMAS). The taxonomic information was uploaded to the Fungal Names repository (https://nmdc.cn/fungalnames/).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

Fungal genomic DNA was extracted using a DNA extraction kit (Cat. No.: 70409-20; BEAVER Biomedical Engineering Co., Ltd.) (Doyle et al. 1990; Wang et al. 2023). The ITS, LSU, TEF1α, Act, and SSU regions were amplified using the primer pairs and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) programs specified in Table 1. The final volume of the reaction mixture was 25 μL, containing 12.5 μL 2 × Hieff Canace Plus PCR Master Mix with dye (Yeasen Biotechnology, Cat. No. 10154ES03), 9.5 μL ddH2O, 1 μL forward primer (10 μM), 1 μL reverse primer (10 μM), and 1 µL of genomic DNA template (1 ng/μL). The PCR programs are listed in Table 1. PCR amplification products were observed on a 2% agarose electrophoresis gel. Fragments were visualized at 254 nm UV light (Zhang et al. 2022). The amplified product was purified using a gel extraction kit (Cat# AE0101-C, Shandong Sparkjade Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). Primer synthesis and DNA sequencing were carried out by Tsingke Biotechnology (Beijing, China). MEGA v. 7.0 (Mega Limited, Auckland, New Zealand) was used to obtain consensus sequences. Finally, all sequences generated in this study were deposited in GenBank.

Table 1.

PCR information used in this study.

Loci PCR primers Primer sequence (5’ – 3’) PCR cycles References
ITS ITS5 GGA AGT AAA AGT CGT AAC AAG G 95 °C 5 min; (95 °C: 30 s, 55 °C: 30 s, 72 °C: 1 min) × 35 cycles; 72 °C 10 min White et al. (1990)
ITS4 TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC
LSU LR0R GTA CCC GCT GAA CTT AAG C 95 °C 5 min; (94 °C: 30 s, 52 °C: 45 s, 72 °C: 1.5 min) × 30 cycles; 72 °C 10 min Hurdeal et al. (2023)
LR5 TCC TGA GGG AAA CTT CG
TEF1α EF1-983F GCYCCYGGHCAYCGTGAYTTYAT 95 °C 5 min; (95 °C: 30 s, 55 °C: 60 s, 72 °C: 60 s) × 30 cycles; 72 °C 10 min Jaklitsch et al. (2005)
TEF1LLErev AACTTGCAGGCAATGTGG
Act ACT-1 TGG GAC GAT ATG GAI AAI ATC TGG CA 95 °C 3 min; (95 °C: 60 s, 55 °C: 60 s, 72 °C: 1 min) × 30 cycles; 72 °C 10 min Voigt and Wöstemeyer (2000)
ACT-4R TC ITC GTA TIC TIG CTI IGA IAT CCA CA T
SSU NS1 GTA GTC ATA TGC TTG TCT CC 95 °C 5 min; (94 °C: 60 s, 54 °C: 50 s, 72 °C: 1 min) × 37 cycles; 72 °C 10 min (White et al. 1990)
NS4 CTT CCG TCA ATT CCT TTA AG

Phylogenetic analyses

Reference sequences were downloaded according to the latest articles (Zhao et al. 2021b; Zhao et al. 2022a; Tao et al. 2024; Zhao et al. 2024). Phylogenetic analyses were performed for each marker individually, followed by a combined analysis (ITS-LSU-SSU-Act-TEF1α). The sequences newly obtained in this study were compared with reference sequences in GenBank using MEGA v.7.0 software (Larsson 2014; Kumar et al. 2016). The phylogeny was inferred using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) algorithms (Nie et al. 2020a; Nie et al. 2020b), which were integrated with the CIPRES Science Portal (https://www.phylo.org/, accessed November 5, 2024). ML analysis was performed using RaxML 8.2.4 (https://www.phylo.org/) in CIPRES Science Gateway V. 3.3 with 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Miller et al. 2010; Nguyen et al. 2015). BI analysis was performed using the GTR + I + G model with a sampling frequency of every 1,000 generations, and eight cold Markov chains were run simultaneously for two million generations (Ronquist et al. 2012; Stamatakis 2014). Utilizing the iTOL website (https://itol.embl.de, accessed November 5, 2024), all trees that resulted were plotted and optimized. Finally, Adobe Illustrator CC 2019 was used to beautify the phylogenetic tree (Jiang et al. 2024).

Results

Molecular phylogeny

Phylogenetic analyses were performed on a dataset containing 103 isolates, including 93 strains retrieved from GenBank and 10 acquired herein. Of these, 99 isolates were classified as the ingroup Absidia, while four strains, Cunninghamella elegans (CBS 160.28), C. elegans (CBS 167.53), C. blakesleeana (CBS 133.27), and C. blakesleeana (CBS 782.68), were employed as outgroups. In total, it consisted of 5,087 concatenated characters: 1–1,102 (ITS), 1,103–2,072 (LSU), 2,073–3,157 (TEF1α), 3,158–4,118 (Act), and 4,119–5,087 (SSU). Among these, 2,766 characters remained constant, 724 were variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 1,597 were parsimony-informative. The maximum likelihood (ML) tree (Fig. 1) and Bayesian tree showed comparable topological structures.

Figure 1. 

Phylogram of the genus Absidia based on a concatenated ITS, LSU, TEF1α, Act, and SSU sequence alignment, with Cunninghamella elegans and C. blakesleeana serving as outgroups. The robustness of branches is marked at the node with the Maximum Likelihood Bootstrap Value (left, MLBV ≥ 70%) and Bayesian Inference Posterior Probability (right, BIPP ≥ 0.90), which are separated by a slash “/”. Ten newly isolated strains are indicated in red bold. Branches shortened to fit the page are indicated by a double slash “//”. Bold strains marked with a star marker “*” are ex-types or ex-holotypes. The scale at the bottom left indicates 0.1 substitutions per site.

Taxonomy

Absidia collariata X.Y. Ji, H. Zhao & X.Y. Liu, sp. nov.

Fig. 2

Type.

China • Yunnan Province, Yuxi City, Xinping Yi Dai Autonomous County, Ancient Tea Horse Road (23°57'28"N, 101°30'38"E, 2196.56 m), from soil, 5 Jul. 2024, X.Y. Ji and X.Y. Liu, holotype HMAS 353360, ex-holotype living culture CGMCC 3.28536 (=XG08666-10-1).

Figure 2. 

Absidia collariata ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28536 a, b colonies on PDA (a obverse b reverse) c–e sporangia f, g swelling on sporangiophores h–j columellae k rhizoids l sporangiospores. Scale bars: 10 μm (c–l).

Etymology.

The collariata (Lat.) refers to its long collars.

Description.

Colonies on PDA at 26 °C for 5 days, reaching 68 mm in diameter, moderately fast growing with a rate of 13.6 mm/d, higher in the center than at margin, at first white, becoming grayish brown when mature, regular shape at reverse. Hyphae light-colored at first, becoming brown when mature, 4.7–9.4 µm (x– = 6.4 µm, n = 20) wide. Stolons branched, hyaline to light brown, smooth, septate, 5.1–6.3 µm (x– = 5.6 µm, n = 15) in diameter. Rhizoids well developed, root-like, branched. Sporangiophores growing on stolons, erect or slightly bent, mostly unbranched or simply branched, smooth, single or 2–4 in whorls, monopodial or sympodial, 21.7–213.5 × 2.3–5.4 µm (x– = 112.8 × 4.1 µm, n = 15). Sporangia globose to pyriform, smooth, hyaline, deliquescent-walled, 16.2–37.0 × 14.0–31.1 µm (x– = 24.2 × 23.2 µm, n = 15), and with a septum 8.8–17.9 µm (x– = 13.9 µm, n = 15) below apophyses; the septum is not obvious when young. Apophyses distinct, funnel-shaped, 6.0–9.5 µm (x– = 8.5 µm, n = 15) high, 5.1–8.8 µm (x– = 6.2 µm, n = 15) wide at the base, and 8.4–13.9 µm (x– = 10.7 µm, n = 15) wide at the top, darker brown when old. Collars present, obvious. Columellae nearly conical, sometimes subspherical to hemispherical, 8.1–13.8 × 7.7–14.9 µm (x– = 10.6 × 10.9 µm, n = 15). Projections absent or present, hyaline, single. Sporangiospores hyaline, smooth, mostly oval, 2.1–3.8 × 1.8–2.7 µm (x– = 3.1 × 2.3 µm, n = 20). Chlamydospores absent. Zygospores not found.

Maximum growth temperature.

29 °C.

Additional specimen examined.

China • Yunnan Province, Yuxi City (23°57'28"N, 101°30'38"E, 2196.56 m), from soil, 5 Jul. 2024, X.Y. Ji and X.Y. Liu, living culture XG08666-10-2.

Notes.

In the molecular phylogeny, A. collariata was closely related to A. psychrophilia (Zhao et al. 2022b). Morphologically, the width of stolons in A. collariata was smaller than that in A. psychrophilia (5.1–6.3 µm vs. 5.5–11 µm). Furthermore, the A. collariata has smaller sporangiophores (2.1–3.8 × 1.8–2.7 µm vs. 3.8–5 × 2.2–3.5 µm). The length and width of sporangiophore were also smaller in A. collariata than those in A. psychrophilia (21.7–213.5 × 2.3–5.4 µm vs. 193–288 × 4.5–9 µm). And the A. psychrophilia has larger sporangia (20–50 μm vs. 16.2–37.0 × 14.0–31.1 μm). Zygospores were not observed in A. collariata.

Absidia hainanensis X.Y. Ji, H. Zhao & X.Y. Liu, sp. nov.

Fig. 3

Type.

China • Hainan Province, Danzhou City, Tropical Botanical Garden (19°30'42"N, 109°30'3"E, 168.7 m), from soil, 26 Jun. 2024, X.Y. Ji and X.Y. Liu, holotype HMAS 353362, ex-holotype living culture CGMCC 3.28535 (=XG06908-1).

Figure 3. 

Absidia hainanensis ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28535 a, b colonies on PDA (a obverse b reverse) c, d sporangia e–g columellae h rhizoids i sporangiospores; Scale bars: 10 µm (c–i).

Etymology.

The hainanensis (Lat.) refers to Hainan Province of China, where the type was collected.

Description.

Colonies on PDA at 26 °C for 5 days, reaching 75 mm in diameter, fast growing with a rate of 15 mm/d, at first white, becoming grayish-brown when old. Hyphae hyaline at first, becoming light brown when mature, 2.5–10.2 µm (x– = 5.2 µm, n = 20) in diameter. Rhizoids root-like, simply branched. Stolons hyaline, smooth, branched, 2.9–10.1 µm (x– = 6.1 µm, n = 15) in diameter. Sporangiophores erect or slightly bent, mostly unbranched or simply branched, smooth, monopodial or sympodial, single or 2–4 in whorls, 18.8–159.2 × 1.9–3.7 µm (x– = 75.4 × 2.8 µm, n = 15). Sporangia spherical to subspherical, smooth, hyaline, deliquescent-walled, 15.1–35.2 × 14.3–29.4 µm (x– = 24.2 × 22.1 µm, n = 15), and with a septum 11.5–24.2 µm (x– = 17.0 µm, n = 15) below apophyses. Apophyses obvious, funnel-shaped, 3.3–5.1 µm (x– = 4.6 µm, n = 15) high, 2.5–8.5 µm (x– = 4.3 µm, n = 15) wide at the base, and 7.5–17.4 µm (x– = 11.0 µm, n = 15) wide at the top, light brown, hyaline. Collars present. Columellae mostly oval, 3.9–13.9 × 8.6–19.5 µm (x– = 6.3 × 10.7 µm, n = 15). Projections absent or present, hyaline, single. Sporangiospores ovoid to cylindrical, smooth, hyaline, 3.1–3.7 × 1.9–2.5 µm (x– = 3.6 × 2.2 µm, n = 20). Chlamydospores absent. Zygospores not found.

Maximum growth temperature.

34 °C.

Additional specimen examined.

China • Hainan Province, Danzhou City (19°30'42"N, 109°30'3"E, 168.7 m), from soil, 26 June 2024, X.Y. Ji and X.Y. Liu, living culture XG06908-4.

Notes.

In the molecular phylogeny, A. hainanensis was closely related to A. oblongispora (Zong et al. 2021). Morphologically, the sporangiophores of A. hainanensis were at most four in whorls, while those of A. oblongispora were at most five in whorls. Additionally, the maximum length of the sporangiophores in A. oblongispora was significantly greater than that in A. hainanensis (300 µm vs. 159.2 µm). The sporangiospore size was smaller in A. hainanensis (3.1–3.7 × 1.9–2.5 μm vs. 3.5–4.5 × 2.5–8.5 μm). The A. hainanensis has wider columellae (8.6–19.5 µm vs. 8.5–16.5 µm). Physiologically, the maximum growth temperature of A. hainanensis was higher (34 °C vs. 32 °C).

Absidia pyriformis X.Y. Ji, H. Zhao & X.Y. Liu, sp. nov.

Fig. 4

Type.

China, Yunnan Province, Pu’er City, Mojiang Hani Autonomous County, Lianzhu Town (23°25'34"N, 101°40'58"E, 1338.32 m), from soil, 4 July 2024, X.Y. Ji and X.Y. Liu, holotype HMAS 353359, ex-holotype living culture CGMCC 3.28538 (=XG09540-14-1).

Figure 4. 

Absidia pyriformis ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28538 a, b colonies on PDA (a obverse b reverse) c, d sporangia e–g columellae h rhizoids i sporangiospores; Scale bars: 10 µm (c–i).

Etymology.

The epithet pyriformis (Lat.) refers to the shape of the sporangia.

Description.

Colonies on PDA at 26 °C for 5 days, attaining 76 mm in diameter, moderately fast growing with a rate of 15.2 mm/d, white at first, gradually light gray, irregularly at reverse. Hyphae branched, hyaline at first, sometimes brownish when mature, aseptate when juvenile, septate with age, 3.6–15.2 µm (x– = 6.3 µm, n = 20) wide. Stolons branched, hyaline, smooth, septate, 4.5–11.9 µm (x– = 6.9 µm, n = 15) in diameter. Rhizoids well developed, root-like, branched, tapering at the end. Sporangiophores arising from stolons, erect or slightly bent, 2–5 in whorls, monopodial, mostly unbranched or simply branched, smooth, 21.7–279.8 × 1.4–7.4 µm (x– = 97.9 × 4.4 µm, n = 15), with one septum 11.5–26.8 µm (x– = 18.5 µm, n = 15) below apophyses. Sporangia are mostly pyriform, deliquescent-walled, smooth, multi-spored, colorless when young, brownish when old, 11.7–38.8 × 11.0–29.7 µm (x– = 27.9 × 22.1 µm, n = 15). Apophyses distinct, subhyaline, usually brownish when old, 5.0–8.4 µm (x– = 7.0 µm, n = 15) high, 2.4–6.1 µm (x– = 4.4 µm, n = 15) wide at the base, and 8.9–19.2 µm (x– = 12.5 µm, n = 15) wide at the top. Collars distinct. Columellae hemispherical, subglobose to globose, smooth, subhyaline or brownish, 8.8–21.4 × 16.7–20.7 µm (x– = 10.9 × 16.7 µm, n = 15). Projections at the apex, when smaller, with an oval projection. Sporangiospores hyaline, smooth, almost cylindrical, 3.2–4.5 × 1.7–2.8 µm (x– = 3.9 × 2.2 µm, n = 20). Chlamydospores absent. Zygospores absent.

Maximum growth temperature.

33 °C.

Additional specimen examined.

China • Yunnan Province, Pu’er City, from soil (23°25'34"N, 101°40'58"E, 1338.32 m), 4 July 2024, X.Y. Ji and X.Y. Liu, living culture XG09540-14-5.

Notes.

Phylogenetically, A. pyriformis was closely related to A. soli (Hurdeal et al. 2021). Compared with A. soli, the A. pyriformis presented a smaller sporangia size (11.7–38.8 × 11.0–29.7 µm vs. 16–51 × 15–45.5 µm), and the septum showed at a shorter distance from apophyses (11.5–26.8 µm vs. 21.5–37.5 µm); conversely, sporangiophores exhibited a larger size (3.2–4.5 µm vs. 1.7–2.8 µm), and columellae had a longer length (8.8–21.4 µm vs. 7.5–12.5 µm).

Absidia tardiva X.Y. Ji, H. Zhao & X.Y. Liu, sp. nov.

Fig. 5

Type.

China, Yunnan Province, Yuxi County, Jinshan National Forest (23°38'15"N, 101°16'30"E, 2397.53 m), from soil, 14 May 2024, X.Y. Ji and X.Y. Liu, holotype HMAS 353358, ex-holotype living culture CGMCC 3.28537 (=XG08757-4).

Figure 5. 

Absidia tardiva ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28537 a, b colonies on PDA (a obverse b reverse) c, e sporangia f, g a swelling on sporangiophores and hyphae h, i columellae j sporangiospores. Scale bars: 10 µm (c–j).

Etymology.

The epithet tardiva (Lat.) refers to this species growing more slowly than other strains.

Description.

Colonies on PDA at 26 °C for 4 days, reaching 41 mm in diameter, slow-growing with a rate of 10.25 mm/d; it begins white and gradually turns pale yellow to grayish-brown, irregular at reverse. Hyphae branched, hyaline at first, brownish when mature, 2.6–10.7 µm (x– = 5.6 µm, n = 20) in diameter, sometimes swollen. Stolons hyaline to brownish, smooth, branched, 3.7–8.4 µm (x– = 5.7 µm, n = 15) in diameter. Rhizoids not observed. Sporangiophores erect or slightly bent, single or 2–4 in whorls, unbranched or simply branched, monopodial or sympodial, with a septum 10.6–23.1 µm (x– = 13.8 µm, n = 15) below apophyses, 7.9–141.9 × 1.9–7.4 µm (x– = 70.7 × 4.2 µm, n = 15), sometimes with a swelling beneath sporangia. Sporangia subspherical to spherical, smooth, multi-spored, 12.9–48.3 × 9.3–34 µm (x– = 30.3 × 22.2 µm, n = 15), deliquescent-walled. Apophyses distinct, subhyaline, small, slightly pigmented, 3.2–10.4 µm (x– = 5.2 µm, n = 15) high, 2.9–7.2 µm (x– = 4.4 µm, n = 15) wide at the base, and 8.0–20.5 µm (x– = 13.2 µm, n = 15) wide at the top. Collars absent. Columellae hemispherical, subhyaline to hyaline, smooth, 2.9–13.8 × 4.9–16.3 µm (x– = 8.7 × 9.8 µm, n = 15). Projections present, shaped like a grain of rice. Sporangiospores variously shaped, mostly ovoid; a few are cylindrical or subglobose, smooth, hyaline, 3.4–4.6 × 2.1–2.8 µm (x– = 3.9 × 2.3 µm, n = 20). Chlamydospores absent. Zygospores not observed.

Maximum growth temperature.

27 °C.

Additional specimen examined.

China • Yunnan Province, Yuxi County, from soil (23°38'15"N, 101°16'30"E, 2397.53 m), 14 May 2024, X.-Y. Ji and X.-Y. Liu, living culture XG08757-6.

Notes.

Phylogenetic analysis of five genes showed that A. tardiva was closely related to A. psychrophilia (Zhao et al. 2022b). Morphologically, the sporangia shape of A. psychrophilia was pyriform, while the sporangia of A. tardiva were hemispherical to spherical in shape. And the distance between the septum and apophysis was shorter in A. psychrophilia than in A. tardiva (10–17 µm vs. 10.6–23.1 µm). The columellae of A. psychrophilia were larger than those of A. tardiva (6.5–30 μm in diameter vs. 2.9–13.8 × 4.9–16.3 μm). The overall size of spores in A. psychrophilia was slightly larger than that in A. tardiva (long: 3.8–5 × 2.2–3.5 µm vs. wide: 3.4–4.6 × 2.1–2.8 µm); the shape of sporangiospores in A. psychrophilia was cylindrical, whereas the shape of spores in A. tardiva was oval.

Absidia tibetensis X.Y. Ji, H. Zhao & X.Y. Liu, sp. nov.

Fig. 6

Type.

China • Tibet, Xigaze City, Yadong Country (27°21'53"N, 88°58'26"E, 2827 m), from soil, 1 Oct 2024, X.Y. Ji and X.Y. Liu, holotype HMAS 353361, ex-holotype living culture CGMCC 3.28534 (=XG00415-1).

Figure 6. 

Absidia tibetensis ex-holotype CGMCC 3.28534 a, b colonies on PDA (a obverse b reverse) c, d sporangia e–g columellae h, i a swelling on sporangiophores and hyphae j rhizoids k sporangiospores. Scale bars: 10 μm (c–k).

Etymology.

The tibetensis (Lat.) refers to the Tibet Autonomous Region of China, where the type was collected.

Description.

Colonies on PDA at 26 °C for 5 days, reaching 53 mm in diameter, slow-growing with a rate of 10.6 mm/d, white at first and gradually turning to light brown; the reverse side of the colony resembles a petal-shaped, regularly at reverse. Rhizoids root-like, always branched, with a septum at the top. Hyphae hyaline to slightly gray, 5.0–10.0 µm (x– = 7.1 µm, n = 20) in diameter, sometimes ampulliform-shaped swollen. Stolons hyaline, slightly brownish, branched, smooth, 3.2–11.0 µm (x– = 6.0 µm, n = 15) in diameter. Sporangiophores erect or slightly bent, unbranched or simple branched, smooth, single or 2–5 in whorls, monopodial or sympodial, 14.7–144.0 × 2.5–5.7 µm (x– = 78.2 × 4.0 µm, n = 15), sometimes with a swelling beneath sporangia. Sporangia globose to pyriform, smooth, multi-spored, deliquescent-walled, 11.0–30.2 × 11.1–26.6 µm (x– = 21.5 × 17.1 µm, n = 15), and with a septum 8.4–20.0 µm (x– = 15.6 µm, n = 15) below apophyses. Apophyses obvious, funnel-shaped, gradually widening from the base to the top, 2.5–9.6 µm (x– = 6.7 µm, n = 15) high, 3.2–8.3 µm (x– = 4.2 µm, n = 15) wide at the base, and 7.4–19.0 µm (x– = 11.2 µm, n = 15) wide at the top, hyaline, light brown. Collars absent or present. Columellae conical, nearly globose, occasionally oval, 8.5–19.9 × 10.1–16.5 µm (x– = 11.3 × 11.8 µm, n = 15). Projections present or absent, hyaline when present, needle-pointed. Sporangiospores smooth, hyaline, mostly oval, 2.6–3.9 × 1.6–2.4 µm (x– = 3.6 × 2.1 µm, n = 20). Chlamydospores absent. Zygospores not found.

Maximum growth temperature.

30 °C.

Additional specimen examined.

China • Tibet, Xigaze City, Yadong County (27°21'53"N, 88°58'26"E, 2827 m), from soil, 1 October 2024, X.Y. Ji and X.Y. Liu, living culture XG00415-3.

Notes.

In the molecular phylogeny, A. tibetensis was closely related to A. sichuanensis (Zhao et al. 2022b). Morphologically, the maximum width of the hyphae in A. yunnanensis was greater than that in A. tibetensis (15.5 µm vs. 10.0 µm). Apophyses had a wider base width and top width in A. tibetensis (3.2–8.3 × 7.4–19.0 μm vs. 3.0–5.0 × 5.5–12.0 μm). The sporangiophore size was smaller in A. tibetensis (2.6–3.9 × 1.6–2.4 μm vs. 3.0–4.5 × 2.0–2.5 μm). The swelling on sporangiophores and hyphae was observed in A. tibetensis. The collars were not observed in A. sichuanensis. Physiologically, the maximum growth temperature of A. tibetensis was higher (30 °C vs. 28 °C).

Discussion

Absidia is widely distributed. Some soil samples in Yunnan Province, Tibet Autonomous Region, and Hainan Province were investigated in this study. The cities Pu’er and Yuxi in Yunnan Province have a subtropical monsoon climate with complex terrain, mild and humid climate, and abundant precipitation. The climatic environment is conducive to the growth of various microorganisms. Yadong County of the Tibet Autonomous Region has a plateau and mountainous climate, with significant seasonal changes and extreme weather phenomena. Danzhou City, in Hainan Province, has a tropical humid monsoon climate with abundant sunshine and abundant rainfall. Five new species of the genus Absidia were discovered in these places (Wu et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2021; Zhao et al. 2022b; Jiang et al. 2024).

Based on morphology, growth temperature dynamics, and molecular phylogenetic analyses, five novel species were identified in the genus Absidia, namely A. collariata sp. nov., A. hainanensis sp. nov., A. pyriformis sp. nov., A. tardiva sp. nov., and A. tibetensis sp. nov. In this study, phylogenetic analysis was performed for these five novel species based on five loci, namely ITS, LSU, TEF1α, Act, and SSU. By analyzing these data, strong support was obtained for the clades of these species (A. tardiva 100% MLBV and 1.00 BIPP; A. pyriformis 100% MLBV and 1.00 BIPP; A. collariata 100% MLBV and 1.00 BIPP; A. tibetensis 100% MLBV and 1.00 BIPP; A. hainanensis 100% MLBV and 1.00 BIPP; Fig. 1). At the same time, in terms of morphological structure and physiology, we also found some differences between these five newly discovered species and their closely related species (Benny 2008; Zheng et al. 2009; Hurdeal et al. 2021; Urquhart and Idnurm 2021). They have great differences in sporangiospore size, stolon width, sporangia size, base and top width of the apophyses, and so on (Ellis and Hesseltine 1965; Davoust and Persson 1992; Lima et al. 2020). Besides, the maximum growth temperature between them is also different. These differences laid the foundation for the identification of the five novel species.

Table 2.

GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in this study.

Species Strains GenBank accession numbers
ITS LSU TEF-1α Act SSU
Absidia abundans XY09265 ON074697 ON074681 NA NA NA
A. abundans CGMCC 3.16255* NR_182590 ON074683 NA NA NA
A. abundans XY09274 ON074696 ON074682 NA NA NA
A. aguabelensis URM 8213* NR_189383 NG_241934 NA NA NA
A. alpina CGMCC 3.16104 OL678133 NA NA NA NA
A. ampullacea CGMCC 3.16054 MZ354138 MZ350132 NA NA NA
A. anomala CBS 125.68* MH859085 MH870799 NA NA NA
A. anomala FSU5798 EF030523 NA NA EF030535 NA
A. biappendiculata CBS 187.64 MZ354153 MZ350147 MZ357420 MZ357438 NA
A. bonitoensis URM 7889* MN977786 MN977805 NA NA NA
A. brunnea CGMCC 3.16055* MZ354139 MZ350133 MZ357403 MZ357421 NA
A. caatinguensis URM 7156* NR_154704 NG_058582 NA NA NA
A. caerulea XY00608 OL620081 NA NA NA NA
A. caerulea XY00729 OL620082 NA NA NA NA
A. caerulea CBS101.36 MH855718 MH867230 NA NA NA
A. caerulea FSU767 AY944870 NA NA NA NA
A. californica CBS 314.78 JN205816 MH872902 NA NA NA
A. californica FSU4748 AY944873 EU736301 EU736247 EU736224 EU736274
A. californica FSU4747 AY944872 EU736300 EU736246 AY944758 EU736273
A. chinensis CGMCC 3.16057 MZ354141 MZ350135 NA MZ357422 NA
A. chinensis CGMCC 3.16056* MZ354140 MZ350134 NA NA NA
A. cinerea CGMCC 3.16062 MZ354146 MZ350140 MZ357407 MZ357427 NA
A. collariata CGMCC 3.28536* PQ610533 PQ605104 PQ613269 PQ613279 PQ605114
A. collariata XG08666-10-2 PQ610534 PQ605105 PQ613270 PQ613280 PQ605115
A. cornuta URM 6100* NR_172976 MN625255 NA NA NA
A. cuneospora CBS 101.59* MH857828 MH869361 NA NA NA
A. cylindrospora CBS 100.08 JN205822 JN206588 NA NA NA
A. digitula CGMCC 3.16058* MZ354142 MZ350136 MZ357404 MZ357423 NA
A. edaphica MFLUCC 20-0088 NR_172305 NG_075367 NA MT410739 NG_074951
A. frigida CGMCC 3.16201* NR_182565 OM030223 NA NA NA
A. fusca CBS 102.35* NR_103625 NG_058552 NA NA NA
A. gemella CGMCC 3.16202* OM108488 OM030224 NA NA NA
A. glauca CBS 129233 MH865253 MH876693 NA NA NA
A. glauca CBS 101.08* MH854573 MH866105 NA NA NA
A. glauca FSU660 AY944879 EU736302 EU736248 EU736225 EU736275
A. globospora CGMCC 3.16031* NR_189829 MW671544 MZ357412 MZ357431 NA
A. globospora CGMCC 3.16035 MW671538 MW671545 MZ357413 MZ357432 NA
A. globospora CGMCC 3.16036 MW671539 MW671546 MZ357414 MZ357433 NA
A. hainanensis CGMCC 3.28535* PQ610537 PQ605108 PQ613273 PQ613283 PQ605118
A. hainanensis XG06908-4 PQ610538 PQ605109 PQ613274 PQ613284 PQ605119
A. heterospora SHTH021 JN942683 JN982936 NA NA JQ004928
A. heterospora CBS101.29* JN206595.1 MH866483.1 NA NA NA
A. jiangxiensis CGMCC 3.16105* OL678134 PP780377 PP790569 PP790577 PP779719
A. jindoensis CNUFC-PTI1-1 MF926622 MF926616 MF926513 MF926510 MF926626
A. koreana EML-IFS45-1* KR030062 KR030056 KR030060 KR030058 KT321298
A. koreana XY00816 OL620083 ON123771 NA NA NA
A. koreana XY00596 OL620084 NA NA NA NA
A. lobata CGMCC 3.16256 ON074690 ON074679 NA NA NA
A. longissima CGMCC 3.16203* NR_182566 OM030225 NA NA NA
A. macrospora FSU4746 AY944882 EU736303 EU736249 AY944760 EU736276
A. macrospora CBS 697.68* HM849704.1 NA NA NA NA
A. medulla CGMCC 3.16034 NR_189832 MW671549 MZ357417 MZ357436 NA
A. montepascoalis URM 8218 NR_172995 NA NA NA NA
A. multispora URM 8210* MN953780 MN953782 NA NA NA
A. nigra CBS 127.68* NR_173068 MZ350146 MZ357419 MZ357437 NA
A. nigra CGMCC 3.16059 MZ354143 MZ350137 MZ357405 MZ357424 NA
A. nigra CGMCC 3.16060 MZ354144 MZ350138 MZ357406 MZ357425 NA
A. oblongispora CGMCC 3.16061 MZ354145 MZ350139 NA MZ357426 NA
A. ovalispora CGMCC 3.16019 NR_176748 MW264131 NA NA NA
A. panacisoli SYPF 7183* MF522181 MF522180 MF624251 NA MF522179
A. pararepens XY00631 OL620085 ON123774 NA NA NA
A. pararepens XY00615 OL620086 NA NA NA NA
A. pararepens XY05899 OL620087 NA NA NA NA
A. pararepens CCF 6352 MT193669 MT192308 NA NA NA
A. pernambucoensis URM < BRA > 7219 MN635568 MN635569 NA NA NA
A. pseudocylindrospora EML-FSDY6-2 KU923817 KU923814 NA KU923815 KU923819
A. psychrophilia FSU4745 AY944874 EU736306 EU736252 AY944762 EU736279
A. purpurea CGMCC 3.16106 OL678135 NA NA NA NA
A. pyriformis CGMCC 3.28538* PQ610531 PQ605102 PQ613267 PQ613277 PQ605112
A. pyriformis XG09540-14-5 PQ610532 PQ605103 PQ613268 PQ613278 PQ605113
A. radiata CGMCC 3.16257 ON074698 ON074684 NA NA NA
A. radiata XY09330-1 ON074699 ON074685 NA NA NA
A. repens CBS 115583* NR_103624 NG_058551 NA NA NA
A. saloaensis URM 8209* MN953781 MN953783 NA NA NA
A. sichuanensis CGMCC 3.16258* NR_182589 ON074688 NA NA NA
A. soli MFLU-20-0414* MT396373 MT393988 NA NA MT394049
A. spinosa FSU551 AY944887 EU736307 EU736253 EU736227 EU736280
A. stercoraria EML-DG8-1* KU168828 KT921998 KT922002 KT922000 NG_065640
A. sympodialis CGMCC 3.16063* MZ354147 MZ350141 NA NA NA
A. sympodialis CGMCC 3.16064 MZ354148 MZ350142 MZ357408 NA NA
A. tardiva CGMCC 3.28537* PQ610529 PQ605100 PQ613265 PQ613275 PQ605110
A. tardiva XG08757-6 PQ610530 PQ605101 PQ613266 PQ613276 PQ605111
A. terrestris FMR 14989* LT795003 LT795005 NA NA NA
A. tibetensis CGMCC 3.28534* PQ610535 PQ605106 PQ613271 PQ613281 PQ605116
A. tibetensis XG00415-3 PQ610536 PQ605107 PQ613272 PQ613282 PQ605117
A. turgida CGMCC 3.16032* NR_189830 NG_241931 MZ357415 MZ357434 NA
A. varians CGMCC 3.16065* MZ354149 MZ350143 MZ357409 MZ357428 NA
A. virescens CGMCC 3.16066* MZ354150 MZ350144 MZ357410 MZ357429 NA
A. virescens CGMCC 3.16067 MZ354151 MZ350145 MZ357411 MZ357430 NA
A. xinjiangensis CGMCC 3.16107* OL678136 NA NA NA NA
A. yunnanensis XY09528 ON074701 ON074686 NA NA NA
A. yunnanensis CGMCC 3.16259* NR_182591 NG_149054 NA NA NA
A. zonata CGMCC 3.16033* NR_189831 MW671548 MZ357416 MZ357435 NA
A. zygospora RSPG 214 KC478527 NA NA NA NA
A. zygospora ANG28 DQ914420 NA NA NA NA
A. zygospora MFLUCC 23-0016* OR104965 OR104992 NA NA NA
Cunninghamella blakesleeana CBS 782.68 JN205869 MH870950 NA NA NA
C. blakesleeana CBS 133.27* JN205865.1 MH866397.1 KJ156479.1 NA NA
C. elegans CBS 167.53 MH857146 HM849700 NA NA NA
C. elegans CBS 160.28* AF254928.1 NA KJ156470.1 NA NA

Absidia has important physiological functions, which are manifested in many aspects, such as ecology, industry, medicine, and so on. Ecologically, it helps in the decomposition of organic matter, which is essential for nutrient cycling. Industrially, it is used for the biotransformation of various natural products. However, it also has a downside: some species of the genus Absidia that can grow at 37 °C are opportunistic pathogens that cause diseases in humans and animals (Zhao et al. 2022b; Tao et al. 2024). Therefore, there is still great research value in the physiological function of the genus Absidia. As of 11 November 2024, the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (https://www.gbif.org/, accessed 11 November 2024) contains 8,496 globally reported georeferenced records of the genus Absidia species. The genus is most widely distributed in Europe and least in Antarctica (Ellis and Hesseltine 1965; Tran et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2021). In this study, new species of Absidia were found in regions with different climates in Yunnan, Hainan, and Tibet in China, which further revealed the species diversity of Absidia in different regions.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 32170012, 32470004, 32300011). The Key Technological Innovation Program of Shandong Province, China (no. 2022CXGC020710), the Jinan City’s ‘New University 20 Policies’ Initiative for Innovative Research Teams Project (no. 202228028), and the Innovative Agricultural Application Technology Project of Jinan City (no. CX202210).

Author contributions

X.Y. Ji took charge of the drawings, DNA sequencing, and data analyses and drafted the paper; Z.Y. Ding, H. Zhao, and S. Wang collected samples and isolated cultures; Y. Nie and B. Huang revised the paper; and X.Y. Liu revised the paper and provided funding.

Author ORCIDs

Xin-Yu Ji https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4121-9103

Zi-Ying Ding https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1618-5740

Yong Nie https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8964-1661

Heng Zhao https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2938-5613

Shi Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7376-7638

Bo Huang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6032-7396

Xiao-Yong Liu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-010X

Data availability

The sequences of this study have been submitted to the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed November 15, 2024) with accession numbers shown in Table 2.

References

  • Constantinides J, Misra A, Nassab R, Wilson Y (2008) Absidia corymbifera fungal infection in burns: A case report and review of the literature. Journal of Burn Care & Research; Official Publication of the American Burn Association 29(2): 416–419. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e318166da78
  • Cordeiro TRL, Nguyen TTT, Lima DX, Da Silva SBG, De Lima CF, Leitão JDA, Gurgel LMS, Lee HB, De Azevedo Santiago ALCM (2020) Two new species of the industrially relevant genus Absidia (Mucorales) from soil of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Acta Botanica Brasílica 34(3): 549–558. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062020abb0040
  • Crous P, Wingfield M, Chooi Y, Gilchrist C, Lacey E, Pitt J, Roets F, Swart W, Cano J, Valenzuela-Lopez N, Hubka V, Shivas R, Stchigel AM, Holdom D, Jurjević Ž, Kachalkin A, Lebel T, Lock C, Martín M, Groenewald JZ (2020) Fungal Planet description sheets: 1042–1111. Persoonia 44(1): 301–459. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2020.44.11
  • Davoust N, Persson A (1992) Effects of growth morphology and time of harvesting on the chitosan yield of Absidia repens. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 37: 572–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240727
  • Ding ZY, Ji XY, Tao MF, Liu WX, Jiang Y, Zhao H, Meng Z, Liu XY (2025) (in review) Unveiling species diversity within early-diverging fungi from China IV: Four new species of Absidia (Cunninghamellaceae, Mucoromycota). MycoKeys. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202504.1116.v1
  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, Brown AHD (1990) Chloroplast DNA phylogenetic affinities of newly described species in Glycine (Leguminosae: Phaseoleae). Systematic Botany 15(3): 466–471. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419362
  • Guan QX, Li YF, Zhao CL (2021) Morphological and phylogenetic evidence for recognition of two new species of Hyphoderma (Basidiomycota) from southern China, with a key to all Chinese Hyphoderma. MycoKeys 83: 145–160. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.83.69909
  • Hoffmann K, Voigt K (2009) Absidia parricida plays a dominant role in biotrophic fusion parasitism among mucoralean fungi (Zygomycetes): Lentamyces, a new genus for A. parricida and A. zychae. Plant Biology 11: 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00145.x
  • Hoffmann K, Discher S, Voigt K (2007) Revision of the genus Absidia (Mucorales, Zygomycetes) based on physiological, phylogenetic, and morphological characters; thermotolerant Absidia spp. form a coherent group, Mycocladiaceae fam. nov. Mycological Research 111: 1169–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2007.07.002
  • Jaklitsch WM, Komon M, Kubicek CP, Druzhinina IS (2005) Hypocrea voglmayrii sp. nov. from the Austrian Alps represents a new phylogenetic clade in Hypocrea/Trichoderma. Mycologia 97(6): 1365–1378. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832743
  • Jiang Y, Zhang ZX, Zhang J, Wang S, Zhang XG (2024) Morphological and phylogenetic analyses reveal three new species of Phyllosticta (Botryosphaeriales, Phyllostictaceae) in China. Journal of Fungi (Basel, Switzerland) 10(1): 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10010007
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(7): 1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
  • Lima DX, Cordeiro TRL, De Souza CAF, De Oliveira RJV, Lee HB, De Souza-Motta CM, Santiago A (2020) Morphological and molecular evidence for two new species of Absidia from Neotropic soil. Phytotaxa 446: 61–71. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.446.1.8
  • Liu P, Zou Y, Li S, Stephenson SL, Wang Q, Li Y (2019) Two new species of dictyostelid cellular slime molds in high-elevation habitats on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Scientific Reports 9: 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37896-7
  • Liu XF, Tibpromma S, Xu JC, Kumla J, Karunarathna SC, Zhao CL (2021) Taxonomy and phylogeny reveal two new potential edible ectomycorrhizal mushrooms of Thelephora from East Asia. Diversity 13(12): 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13120646
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Nie Y, Cai Y, Gao Y, Yu DS, Wang ZM, Liu XY, Huang B (2020a) Three new species of Conidiobolus sensu stricto from plant debris in eastern China. MycoKeys 73: 133–149. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.73.56905
  • Nie Y, Yu DS, Wang CF, Liu XY, Huang B (2020b) A taxonomic revision of the genus Conidiobolus (Ancylistaceae, Entomophthorales): Four clades including three new genera. MycoKeys 66: 55–81. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.66.46575
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Tao MF, Ding ZY, Wang YX, Zhang ZX, Zhao H, Meng Z, Liu XY (2024) Unveiling species diversity within early-diverging fungi from China II: Three new species of Absidia (Cunninghamellaceae,Mucoromycota) from Hainan Province. MycoKeys 110: 255–272. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.110.129120
  • Tieghem P (1878) Troisième mémoire sur les Mucorinées. Annales des Sciences Naturelles; Botanique 4: 312–399.
  • Tran NT, Miles AK, Dietzgen RG, Drenth A (2019) Phyllosticta capitalensis and P. paracapitalensis are endophytic fungi that show potential to inhibit pathogenic P. citricarpa on Citrus australas. Plant Pathology 48: 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-019-00628-0
  • Wang K, Chen SL, Dai YC, Jia ZF, Li TH, Liu TZ, Phurbu D, Mamut R, Sun GY, Bau T, Wei SL, Yang ZL, Yuan HS, Zhang XG, Cai L (2021) Overview of China’s nomenclature novelties of fungi in the new century (2000–2020). Junwu Xuebao 40(4): 822–833. https://doi.org/10.13346/j.mycosystema.210064
  • Wang S, Liu X, Xiong C, Gao S, Xu W, Zhao L, Song C, Liu X, James TY, Li Z, Zhang X (2023) ASF1 regulates asexual and sexual reproduction in Stemphylium eturmiu num by DJ-1 stimulation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Fungal Diversity 123(1): 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-023-00528-1
  • Wang YX, Zhao H, Jiang Y, Liu XY, Tao MF, Liu XY (2024) Unveiling species diversity within early-diverging fungi from China III: Six new species and a new record of Gongronella (Cunninghamellaceae, Mucoromycota). MycoKeys 110: 287–317. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.110.130260
  • White T, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J, Innis M, Gelfand D, Sninsky J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, in PCR proto cols: a guide to methods and applications, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978 0-12-372180-8.50042-1
  • Zhang TY, Yu Y, Zhu H, Yang SZ, Yang TM, Zhang MY, Zhang YX (2018) Absidia panacisoli sp. nov., isolated from rhizosphere of Panax notoginseng. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 68(8): 2468–2472. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002857
  • Zhang ZX, Liu RY, Liu SB, Mu TC, Zhang XG, Xia JW (2022) Morphological and phylogenetic analyses reveal two new species of Sporocadaceae from Hainan, China. MycoKeys 88: 171–192. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.88.82229
  • Zhao H, Lv ML, Liu Z, Zhang MZ, Wang YN, Ju X, Song Z, Ren LY, Jia BS, Qiao M, Liu XY (2021a) High-yield oleaginous fungi and high-value microbial lipid resources from Mucoromycota. BioEnergy Research 14: 1196–1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10219-3
  • Zhao H, Zhu J, Zong TK, Liu XL, Ren LY, Lin Q, Qiao M, Nie Y, Zhang ZD, Liu XY (2021b) Two new species in the family Cunninghamellaceae from China. Mycobiology 49(2): 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/12298093.2021.1904555
  • Zhao H, Nie Y, Zong TK, Dai YC, Liu XY (2022a) Three new species of Absidia (Mucoromycota) from China based on phylogeny, morphology and physiology. Diversity 14(2): 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14020132
  • Zhao H, Nie Y, Zong TK, Wang YJ, Wang M, Dai YC, Liu XY (2022b) Species diversity and ecological habitat of Absidia (Cunninghamellaceae, Mucorales) with emphasis on five new species from forest and grassland soil in China. Journal of Fungi (Basel, Switzerland) 8(5): 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050471
  • Zhao H, Nie Y, Zong TK, Wang K, Lv ML, Cui YJ, Tohtirjap A, Chen JJ, Zhao CL, Wu F, Cui BK, Yuan Y, Dai YC, Liu XY (2023) Species diversity, updated classification and divergence times of the phylum Mucoromycota. Fungi Diversity 123: 49–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-023-00525-4
  • Zhao H, Nie Y, Huang B, Liu XY (2024) Unveiling species diversity within early-diverging fungi from China I: Three new species of Backusella (Backusellaceae, Mucoromycota). MycoKeys 109: 285–304. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.109.126029
  • Zheng RY, Liu XY, Li RY (2009) More Rhizomucor causing human mucormycosis from China: R. chlamydosporus sp. nov. Sydowia 61(1): 135–147.
  • Zong TK, Zhao H, Liu XL, Ren LY, Zhao CL, Liu XY (2021) Taxonomy and phylogeny of four new species in Absidia (Cunninghamellaceae, Mucorales) from China. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 2181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.677836
  • Zou Y, Hou J, Guo S, Li Z, Stephenson SL, Pavlov IN, Liu P, Li Y (2022) Diversity of dictyostelid cellular slime molds, including two species new to science, in forest soils of Changbai Mountain, China. Microbiology Spectrum 10: 5. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02402-22
login to comment