Research Article
Print
Research Article
Lijiangomyces laojunensis gen. et sp. nov. (Mytilinidiaceae), and Sclerococcum stictae (Dactylosporaceae), a new lichenicolous species from Yunnan, China
expand article infoQingfeng Meng§, Paul Diederich|, Vinodhini Thiyagaraja, Damien Ertz#¤, Xinyu Wang, Natsaran Saichana§, Kevin D. Hyde§, Ruvishika S. Jayawardena§«, Shaobin Fu
‡ Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi City, China
§ Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand
| Musée national d’histoire naturelle, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
¶ Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
# Meise Botanic Garden, Research Department, Meise, Belgium
¤ Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, Service Général de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique, Bruxelles, Belgium
« Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Open Access

Abstract

Lijiangomyces laojunensis gen. et sp. nov. and Sclerococcum stictae sp. nov. are reported from China and identified through DNA sequence analyses (LSU, ITS, and tef1-α) and morphological characteristics. Phylogenetic analysis showed that L. laojunensis forms a distinct lineage within Mytilinidiaceae, closely related to the Mytilinidion subclade, leading to the establishment of a new genus within this family. This saprotrophic species grows on the bark of Abies fabri, often surrounded by the thallus of Pertusaria species. Lijiangomyces laojunensis is characterized by broadly open, black hysterothecia, clavate asci, and uniseriate, hyaline muriform ascospores. Sclerococcum stictae, a new lichenicolous species, forms a sister clade relationship to a lichenicolous fungus, S. ricasoliae. It was found on the thallus of Sticta, and is characterized by black apothecia, elongate, cylindrical asci, and brown, elliptical, and 1-septate ascospores. Descriptions, illustrations, and phylogenetic analysis results of the new taxa are provided.

Key words:

2 new taxa, lichen, morphology, phylogeny, saprobe, taxonomy

Introduction

Mytilinidiaceae belongs to Mytilinidiales, Dothideomycetes (Hyde et al. 2024), and was introduced by Kirschstein (1924) to accommodate four genera that were originally classified under Hysteriaceae. Boehm et al. (2009a) introduced Mytilinidiales based on multigene phylogenetic analysis to accommodate Mytilinidiaceae. Pem et al. (2024) included eight genera within Mytilinidiaceae: Actidium, Lophium, Mytilinidion, Ostreola, Peyronelia, Pseudocamaropycnis, Quasiconcha and Zoggium. Hyde et al. (2024) added three more genera: Bullatosporium, Camaroglobulus and Halokirschsteiniothelia, increasing the total to eleven genera within this family. Members of Mytilinidiaceae are distinguished by their globose or obovoid pseudothecia which are typically oyster- or hatchet-shaped with a longitudinal keel and crested apex. They feature bitunicate asci containing eight ascospores that are arranged uniseriately, biseriately, or in aggregated clusters. The ascospores are hyaline to brown, exhibiting diverse morphologies such as scolecospores, didymospores, phragmospores, or dictyospores, and with bipolar symmetry (Boehm et al. 2009a).

Mytilinidion was established to accommodate the type species M. aggregatum. This genus is characterized by globoid to obovoid, erect, conchate, or dolabrate ascomata, and a thin-walled and peridium, bitunicate, 8-spored asci. The ascospores are hyaline to brown and transversely 3–5(–7)-septate (Boehm et al. 2009b; Jayasiri et al. 2018). Ostreola was introduced to accommodate two species, O. consociate and O. sessilis, characterized by conchiform to hatchet-shaped hysterothecia with a longitudinal slit that opens narrowly. The asci are cylindrical, containing eight uniseriate, brown and muriform ascospores (Darker 1963). Ostreola shares similarities with Mytilinidion and Lophium in the ascomatal morphology but is distinguished by the presence of muriform ascospores. Lumbsch and Huhndorf (2007) placed Ostreola within Mytilinidiaceae. The members of Mytilinidion are primarily saprobic and plant pathogens, while Ostreola species are primarily saprobic.

Sclerococcum belongs to Dactylosporaceae, Sclerococcales, Eurotiomycetes (Hyde et al. 2024), and was described by Fries (1819, 1825) to accommodate the parasitic hyphomycetous fungus S. sphaerale, which was previously classified as Spiloma sphaerale. Phylogenetic analysis by Diederich et al. (2013) revealed that S. sphaerale clusters with two species of Dactylospora. In a subsequent study incorporating expanded molecular data, Diederich et al. (2018) proposed adopting the family name Dactylosporaceae, with Sclerococcaceae as its synonym. They further recommended retaining Sclerococcum as the valid genus name and synonymizing Dactylospora under it, as Sclerococcum has nomenclatural priority over Dactylospora. Consequently, 46 Dactylospora species were transferred to Sclerococcum (Diederich et al. 2018). Dactylosporaceae comprises six genera: Cylindroconidiis, Fusichalara, Gamsomyces, Pseudosclerococcum, Rhopalophora and Sclerococcum (Hyde et al. 2024).

During a survey of microfungi in Yunnan Province (Thiyagaraja et al. 2024), two unidentified fungal specimens were collected. The first specimen was found on the bark of Abies fabri, and was often surrounded by the thallus of Pertusaria species while the second was observed growing on the thallus of a foliose lichen belonging to Sticta. Phylogenetic analyses and morphological comparison reveal that the first specimen represents a novel genus closely related to Mytilinidion within Mytilinidiaceae. The second specimen is proposed as a new lichenicolous species within the genus Sclerococcum based on morpho-molecular analyses.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and morphological examination

The specimens were collected from Yunnan Province, China and the important collection information was noted (Rathnayaka et al. 2024). Macro-morphological characteristics were observed using a stereomicroscope (Olympus ZX-16) and photographed with a fitted digital camera (Olympus SC180). The ascomata were sliced, temporarily mounted, and observed under a compound microscope (Nikon Y-TV55), with images captured using a fitted digital camera (Nikon DS-Ri2). Distilled water was used as a mounting slide solution and 10% potassium hydroxide (K) and Lugol’s iodine solution (I) were used to stain and examine the hymenium. Photographic plates were assembled using Adobe Photoshop CC 2019 software (Adobe Systems, USA). Measurements were conducted using Image Framework software (Tarosoft, Version 0.9.7). The length, width, and length/width ratio (l/w) of asci and ascospores are provided (where n ≥ 10) as: (min–) [X−SD]–[X+SD] (–max), where “min” and “max” represent the extreme observed values, X is the arithmetic mean, and SD is the standard deviation. The number of measurements (n) is indicated. Unless otherwise specified, measurements were taken from water mounts, and procedures followed those specified by Senanayake et al. (2020). The holotype specimens are deposited in the Lichen Herbarium of Kunming Institute of Botany (KUN-L), Chinese Academy of Science, Yunnan, China.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

Apothecia were carefully removed with a razor blade under a dissecting microscope, and the lichen thallus was thoroughly cleaned. The sample was then transferred to a 200 μL centrifuge tube. Total genomic DNA was extracted using a Forensic DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, Georgia), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The primer pairs ITS1f/ITS4, LR0R/LR5, 983F/2218R and mrSSU1/mrSSU3R were used respectively, to amplify the internal transcribed spacer region of rDNA (ITS), the 28S large-subunit of rDNA (LSU), the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α), and the mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (mtSSU) (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; White et al. 1990; Gardes and Bruns 1993; Zoller et al. 1999; Rehner and Buckley 2005).

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using a Mastercycler (Bio-RAD T-100) in a 25-μL reaction volume consisting of 12.5 μL of 2 × Mix (Solarbio, dNTPs Mix), 9.5 µL of double-distilled water (ddH2O), 1.0 µL of each primer (10 mM), and 1.0 µL of the DNA template. The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 45 seconds, annealing at 53 °C for ITS, LSU, and mtSSU or at 58 °C for tef1-α, for 90 seconds, and elongation at 72 °C for 1 minute. A final extension was performed at 72 °C for 10 minutes, and the reaction was then held at 4 °C indefinitely. PCR products were sequenced by Shanghai Sangon Biotech (Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China).

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses

The quality of chromatogram sequences was verified using BioEdit Sequence Alignment software (Version 7.0.9.0). Forward and reverse sequences were assembled with ContigExpress software (New York, USA). The newly generated sequences were subjected to BLASTn searches (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and deposited in the GenBank database. BLAST analysis of three genes (LSU, ITS, and tef1-α) from specimen KUN-L 88703 indicated that this species might belong to Gloniales, Hysteriales, or Mytilinidiales. To confirm its phylogenetic placement, all available sequence data from these orders were downloaded from GenBank (Table 1). Additionally, representative species from six adjacent orders, viz. Botryosphaeriales, Capnodiales, Dothideales, Jahnulales, Patellariales, and Pleosporales were included based on references from Boehm et al. (2009b). Two species of Orbilia (Orbiliomycetes, Orbiliales, Orbiliaceae) were selected as the outgroup taxa following Hongsanan et al. (2020) for phylogenetic analysis.

Table 1.

Sequences used in phylogenetic analysis of Mytilinidiales and adjacent orders, with specimens or strains information and GenBank accession numbers. Newly obtained sequences are in bold font. “NA” indicates the sequence is unavailable.

Species name Voucher/strains GenBank accession numbers
ITS LSU tef1-α
Aigialus grandis BCC 20000 NA GU479775 NA
A. mangrovis BCC 33563 NA GU479776 GU479840
A. parvus PUFD45 MK028710 MK026761 MN520611
A. rhizophorae BCC 33572 NA GU479780 GU479844
Aliquandostipite crystallinus AF007 NA EF175652 NA
A. khaoyaiensis MFLUCC 21-0106 MT864350 MT860428 MT873577
Ascagilis guttulaspora MFLUCC 17-0244 NA NG_064432 NA
A. submersa MFLUCC 18-1143 NR_171970 MN888485 NA
A. thailandensis MFLUCC 18-1149 NR_171969 MN913693 NA
Botryosphaeria dothidea CBS 115476 NA DQ678051 DQ767637
Brachiosphaera tropicalis SS 2523 FJ887923 JN819284 JN819298
Bullatosporium taxicola a21-004; CBS 151403 PP516536 PP516533 PP514386
B. taxicola a21-005; CBS 151402 PP516535 PP516534 PP514385
Capnodium aciculiforme CBS 892.73 NA GU301847 GU349045
C. alfenasii CBS 146151 MN749233 MN749165 MN829346
C. coartatum CPC 17779 MN749236 MN749167 MN829348
Cenococcum geophilum CG5 KC967409 NA NA
C. geophilum CG54 KC967410 NA NA
Chaetocapnodium insulare CBS 146159 NR_168830 NG_068681 MN829359
C. philippinense MFLUCC 12-0110 NR_168831 KP744503 MN829362
C. placitae CBS 124758 MH863403 MH874920 MN829363
Conidiocarpus asiaticus MFLUCC10-0062 NA JN832612 NA
C. caucasicus GUMH937 NA KC833050 NA
C. fici-septicae MFLUCC 19-0072 MW063143 MW063206 NA
C. siamensis SICAUCC 23-0010 OR405901 OR405912 OR671432
Delitschia chaetomioides DSE871 MW209042 MW209067 MW238837
D. winteri AFTOL-ID 1599 NA DQ678077 DQ677922
CBS 225.62
Dothidea insculpta CBS 189.58 NA DQ247802 DQ471081
D. sambuci DAOM 231303 NA AY544681 DQ497606
Ericboehmia centramura chuni 70 KM272258 KM272256 KM277819
MFLUCC 12-0808
E. curtisii CBS 198.34 NA MH866967 FJ161093
E. doimaeensis MFLUCC 16-0329 MH535872 MH535894 NA
Fusculina eucalypti CBS 120083 DQ923531 DQ923531 NA
Gloniopsis arciformis GKM L166A NA GU323211 NA
G. calami MFLUCC 15-0739 NR_164398 NG_059715 KX671965
G. leucaenae MFLU 21-0201 OL782134 OL782050 OL875100
G. percutanea FMR 8713 AM286786 LS997561 LS997569
Glonium circumserpens CBS 123342 NA FJ161208 NA
G. circumserpens CBS 123343 NA FJ161200 NA
G. stellatum ANM 32; A. Miller 32, F NA GQ221887 GQ221926
G. stellatum CBS 207.34 MZ570257 FJ161179 FJ161095
Glyphium elatum EB 0365; BPI 892671 KM220945 KM220939 KM220933
Gordonomyces mucovaginatus CBS 127273 NR_157428 NG_057941 NA
Graphyllium caracolinense HUEFS 42838 NA NG_060651 NA
Guignardia gaultheriae CBS 447.70 MH859790 DQ678089 NA
Halokirschsteiniothelia maritima 3124D KM272366 NA NA
H. maritima CBS 221.60 NA AY849943 GU349001
H. maritima NWHC 45703-222 MK782369 NA NA
Hysterium angustatum KUMCC 21-0213 OK482567 OK482568 NA
H. pulicare EB 0238; CBS 123377 NA FJ161201 FJ161109
H. rhizophorae MFLUCC 15-0950 NR_189349 NG_241879 MF615401
Hysterobrevium baoshanense MFLUCC 16-2162 MZ467049 KX772765 KX772769
H. constrictum KUN-HKAS102101 MN429070 MN429073 MN442088
H. rosae CBS 149699 OQ990113 OQ990064 OQ989245
Hysterodifractum partisporum HUEFS 42865 NA NG_060652 NA
Hysterographium didymosporum MFLUCC 10-0101 NA NG_064526 NA
H. fraxini CBS 109.43 NA FJ161171 FJ161088
H. minus JCM 2758 NA NG_059814 NA
Hysteropatella elliptica AFTOL-ID 1790 NA DQ767657 DQ767640
CBS 935.97
H. prostii G.M. 2016-02-20.2 MT341324 MT341324 NA
Jahnula appendiculata BCC11400 JN819280 FJ743446 JN819299
J. dianchia KUMCC 17-0039 KY928456 KY928457 NA
J. rostrata MFLU 20-0435 MT627720 MT627657 NA
Lophium arboricola CBS 758.71 NA MH872091 NA
L. arboricola FMR 3868 KU705825 KU705842 NA
L. arboricola P99; KRAM F-59986 OR754902 OR754924 NA
L. mytilinum CBS 114111 EF596819 EF596819 NA
L. mytilinum CBS 269.34 OM337540 MH867013 NA
L. zalerioides MFLUCC 14-0417 MF621583 MF621587 NA
Massaria inquinas WU 30527 HQ599402 HQ599402 HQ599342
M. vomitoria WU 30606 HQ599437 HQ599437 HQ599375
Mytilinidion acicola EB 0349; BPI 879794 NA GU323209 NA
M. acicola EB 0379; BPI 879793 NA GU397346 NA
M. andinense EB 0330; CBS 123562 NA FJ161199 FJ161107
M. australe CBS 301.34 NR_160067 MH867035 NA
M. californicum EB 0385; BPI 879795 NA GU323208 NA
M. didymospora MFLUCC 16-0619 NA MH535902 NA
M. mytilinellum CBS 303.34 NA MH867037 FJ161100
M. mytilinellum EB 0386; BPI 879796 CBS 303.34 NA GU397347 NA
M. resinicola CBS 304.34 MH855535 MH867038 FJ161101
M. rhenanum CBS 135.34 NA NA FJ161092
M. rhenanum EB 0341; CBS 135.45 NA GU323207 NA
M. scolecosporum CBS 305.34 MH855536 MH867039 FJ161102
M. thujarum EB 0268; BPI 879797 NA GU323206 NA
M. tortile CBS 306.34 MH855537 MH867040 NA
M. tortile EB 0377; BPI 879798 NA GU323205 NA
Neocamarosporium goegapense CBS 138008 KJ869163 KJ869220 NA
N. phragmitis MFLUCC 17-0756 MG844345 NG_070431 MG844351
Neomassaria fabacearum MFLUCC 16-1875 NA KX524145 KX524149
N. formosana NTUCC 17-007 NA MH714756 MH714762
Oedohysterium insidens ANM 1443 NA GQ221882 NA
A. Miller 1443, F
O. insidens CBS 238.34 NA FJ161182 FJ161097
O. sinense EB 0339; BPI 879800 NA GU397348 GU397339
Orbilia auricolor AFTOL-ID 906 DQ491512 DQ470953 DQ471072
CBS 547.63
O. vinosa AFTOL-ID 905 DQ491511 DQ470952 DQ471071
CBS 917.72
Ostreichnion sassafras CBS 322.34 MH855548 FJ161188 NA
Lijiangomyces laojunensis KUN-L 88703 PQ049177 PQ047633 PQ267963
Patellaria apiculatae MCD 096; MFLU 19-1236 MN047094 MN017860 NA
P. atrata CBS 958.97 NA GU301855 GU349038
P. chromolaenae MFLUCC 17-1482 MT214381 MT214475 MT235796
Pseudocamaropycnis pini CBS 115589 KU728518 KU728557
Pseudocenococcum floridanum Culture BA4b001 NA LC095431 LC095383
NBRC 111599
FLAS-F-59166
Psiloglonium araucanum CBS 112412 NA FJ161172 FJ161089
P. colihuae MFLU 11-0214 KP744466 KP744511 NA
P. macrosporum MFLU 18-2218 OR225075 OP612525 OR140436
Purpurepithecium murisporum MFLUCC 16-0611 NA NG_059797 KY887666
P. murisporum MFLUCC 17-0319 NA KY799174 KY799177
Quasiconcha reticulata EB QR; RLG 14189 NA GU397349 NA
Quasiconcha sp. ZY 22.011 OR680490 OR680557 OR865892
CGMCC 3.25498
Quasiconcha sp. ZY 22.012 OR680491 OR680558 OR865893
CGMCC 3.25498
Quasiconcha sp. ZY 22.013 OR680492 OR680559 OR865894
CGMCC 3.25498
Rhytidhysteron bannaense KUMCC 21-0483 OP526399 OP526409 OP572200
R. bruguierae SDBR-CMU 473 OQ943970 OQ940376 OQ973477
R. camporesii KUNCC 22-12388 OR807853 OR801302 OR832866
Yuccamyces citri CBS 143161 MG386043 MG386096 NA
Y. pilosus CBS 579.92 MG386044 MG386097 NA

The BLAST analysis of three genes (LSU, ITS, and mtSSU) from the specimen KUN-L 88687 indicated that this species belongs to Sclerococcales. Sequence data for all available taxa within this order were retrieved from GenBank and are listed in Table 2. Two species of Caliciopsis (Coryneliaceae, Coryneliales, Coryneliomycetidae, Eurotiomycetes) were included as the outgroup following Olariaga et al. (2019).

Table 2.

Sequences used in phylogenetic analysis of Dactylosporaceae with specimens or strains’ information and GenBank accession numbers. Newly obtained sequences are in bold font. “NA” indicates the sequence is unavailable.

Species name Voucher/strains GenBank accession numbers
LSU ITS mtSSU
Umbilicaria sp. INB_io4503Q KM242300 KM242300 NA
Umbilicaria sp. INB_io4513J KM242356 KM242356 NA
Umbilicaria sp. INB_io4513L KM242358 KM242358 NA
Caliciopsis orientalis CBS 138.64 NG_058741 NA FJ190654
C. pinea AFTOL-ID 1869 DQ678097 NA FJ190653
CBS 139.64
Cylindroconidiis aquaticus MFLUCC 11-0294 MH236579 MH236576 NA
Fusichalara minuta CBS 709.88 KX537758 KX537754 KX537762
Gamsomyces aquaticum MFLUCC 18-1015 MN335230 MN335228 NA
G. chiangmaiensis MFLUCC 18-0982 MN335229 MN335227 NA
G. longisporus CBS 118.86 MT020877 MT020865 NA
G. longisporus CBS 240.89 MT020878 MT020866 NA
G. stilboideus CBS 146494 MT020879 MT020867 NA
Pseudosclerococcum golindoi ARAN-Fungi 6619 NG_073673 NR_171236 MK759897
Rhopalophora clavispora CBS 281.75 KX537756 KX537752 KX537760
R. clavispora CBS 129.74 KX537755 KX537751 KX537759
R. clavispora CBS 637.73 KX537757 KX537753 KX537761
Sclerococcum ahtii RP 23 KY661659 KY661630 KY661686
F. Hognabba 1325a (H)
S. ahtii RP182 NA KY661622 NA
CHI17-37a (H)
S. chiangraiensis MFLU 16-0570 NG_066422 NR_163755 NA
S. deminutum RP235 NA KY661629 NA
J. Pykala 39390 (H)
S. fusiformis MFLU 16-0593 NG_066423 NR_163756 NA
S. fusiformis MFLU 18-0678 NA MH718442 NA
S. glaucomarioides RP275; Zhurbenko 13107 (LE 261065) KY661660 KY661632 KY661683
S. glaucomarioides KUN-L 88756 NA OQ991232 OR035764
S. haliotrephum AFTOL-ID 758 FJ176855 NA KJ766382
ATCC MYA-3590
S. haliotrephum J.K.5129B FJ713617 NA NA
AFTOL-ID 798
S. lobariellum Diederich 18109 MH698499 NA MH698503
S. lobariellum Diederich 17708 MH698498 NA MH698502
S. lobariellum ARAN-Fungi 10091 MK759891 NA MK759898
S. mangrovei AFTOL-ID 2108 FJ176890 NA KJ766383
S. martynii D. Haelew. F_1567b MZ221620 MZ221612 NA
PUL F27737
S. martynii D. Haelew. F_1570b MZ221623 MZ221616 NA
PUL F27739
S. martynii D. Haelew. F_1577a MZ221619 MZ221610 NA
PUL F27741
S. parasiticum ARAN-Fungi 2724 MK759892 NA MK759899
S. parasiticum RP422 KY661666 KY661646 KY661690
LE 260868
S. parasiticum F-283586 MK759894 NA MK759901
S. parasiticum F-283587 MK759895 NA MK759902
S. parasiticum ARAN-Fungi A3044025 MK759893 NA MK759900
S. pseudobactrodesmium CGMCC 3.25577T OR514703 OR514694 OR588037
S. pseudobactrodesmium GZCC 23-0056 OR514704 OR514695 OR588038
S. pseudobactrodesmium GZCC 23-0057 OR514705 OR514696 OR588039
S. pseudobactrodesmium GZCC 23-0549 OR514702 OR514693 OR588036
S. ricasoliae A.F. 29132 MT153992 MT153963 MT153924
S. ricasoliae A.F. 25967 MT153991 MT153962 MT153923
S. ricasoliae A.F. Fla6b MT153993 MT153964 MT153925
S. ricasoliae A.F. 25611 MT153990 MT153961 MT153922
S. simplex MFLU 21-0117 MZ655912 MZ664325 MZ676669
Sclerococcum sp. A1153 MF071425 NA MF085485
Sclerococcum sp. A1016 KT263077 NA KT263115
Sclerococcum sp. RP391 KY661664 NA KY661689
S. sphaerale Diederich 17283 JX081673 NA JX081678
S. sphaerale Diederich 17279 JX081672 NA JX081677
S. sphaerale Ertz 17425 (BR) JX081674 NA JX081676
S. stictae KUN-L 88687 PQ407923 PQ408029 PQ415057
S. stictae KUN-L 88687-1 NA PQ408030 NA
S. tardum ICMP 24355 NA NR_176187 NA
S. tardum PDD 91756 NA OL709435 NA
S. tardum PDD 105454 NA MK432753 NA
S. stygium ARAN-Fungi 00823 NA MK759886 MK759904
S. stygium ARAN-Fungi 3395 MK759896 NA MK759903
S. stygium BHI-F312 (FH) NA MF161218 NA
S. vrijmoediae NTOU 4002 KC692153 NR_138396 NA

Sequence alignment, concatenation, model selection, and format conversion were performed using the OFPT program (Zeng et al. 2023). Each gene region dataset was aligned using the ‘auto’ strategy in MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013) and trimmed with the ‘gappyout’ command in TrimAl (Capella-Gutierrez et al. 2009). The best-fit nucleotide substitution models for each dataset were selected using the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) from twenty-two common DNA substitution models with rate heterogeneity, as implemented in ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017). The datasets were then concatenated with partition data for subsequent phylogenetic analyses.

Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was conducted on the IQ-TREE web server applying the ultrafast bootstrap approximation with 1,000 replicates (Hoang et al. 2018), and the SH-like approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-aLRT) (Guindon et al. 2010; Nguyen et al. 2015). The consensus tree was summarized using the extended majority rule. For further verification, an additional ML analysis was performed with RAxML-HPC2 on ACCESS (v8.2.12), using the GTRGAMMA model with a rapid bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates (Miller et al. 2010; Stamatakis 2014).

Bayesian inference was carried out using two parallel Metropolis-coupled Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) runs, each consisting of one ‘cold’ chain and three heated chains, in MrBayes (Ronquist et al. 2012). Trees were sampled every 1,000 generations, and the run was terminated when the average standard deviation of split frequencies fell below 0.01. The final tree was summarized after discarding the first 25% of samples as burn-in and visualized in FigTree v1.4.4 (Rambaut 2016). The newly identified taxon was registered in Index Fungorum and Faces of Fungi database (Jayasiri et al. 2015).

Results

In the analysis of Mytilinidiales, the final dataset comprised 116 taxa (Table 1) with 2246 aligned characters, including gaps (ITS 1–494 bp, LSU 495–1346 bp, and tef1-α 1347–2246 bp). The best-fit models for each gene, determined using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), were as follows: ITS: SYM+I+G4, LSU: TN+F+R4, and tef1-α: TN+F+I+G4. For the combined dataset (LSU, ITS, and tef1-α), the parameters of the GTRGAMMA model were as follows: estimated base frequencies: A = 0.24, C = 0.25, G = 0.28, T = 0.23; substitution rate: AC = 1.12, AG = 3.35, AT = 1.77, CG = 0.88, CT = 8.54, GT = 1.00; gamma distribution shape parameter (α) = 0.325118; and tree-length = 6.868758. The best-scoring RAxML tree was constructed with a final maximum likelihood (ML) optimization likelihood value of -34,803.39. Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP) were calculated using MCMC analysis, achieving a final average standard deviation of split frequencies of 0.009998. The final tree topologies of ML and BYPP analyses were consistent. The best-scoring RAxML tree, based on combined LSU, ITS, and tef1-α sequence datasets, is presented in Fig. 1.

Figure 1. 

RAxML analysis of Mytilinidiales based on the combined LSU, ITS, and tef1-α sequence data. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (ML ≥ 70%), and the Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (PP ≥ 0.90) are shown near the nodes as ML/PP. Orbilia auricolor (AFTOL-ID 906) and O. vinosa (AFTOL-ID 905) were used as outgroups. The newly generated sequence is in red bold font.

The resulting phylogram distinguishes eight order-level clades, most of which are well-supported, except for the Patellariales clade. Seven genera form a strongly supported Mytilinidiales clade, with Mytilinidion appearing polyphyletic. The newly identified species clusters within the Mytilinidiales clade are closely related to a Mytilinidion subclade containing eight species. The remaining Mytilinidion species form a separate clade alongside Lophium. Halokirschsteiniothelia and Quasiconcha form a sister clade to the Ostreola-Mytilinidion grouping. Additionally, two Bullatosporium strains form a distinct clade closely related to other genera within the Mytilinidiales order.

In the analysis of Dactylosporaceae, the final dataset comprised 62 taxa (Table 2) with 2041 aligned characters, including gaps (ITS 1–455 bp, LSU 456–1310 bp, and mtSSU 1311–2041 bp). The best-fit nucleotide substitution models, selected based on the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), were as follows: ITS: TIM2e+I+G4, LSU: TNe+I+G4, mtSSU: TVM+F+I+G4. The parameters for the GTRGAMMA model of the combined LSU, ITS, and mtSSU were as follows: estimated base frequencies: A = 0.29, C = 0.19, G = 0.25, T = 0.26, and substitution rate AC = 1.01, AG = 2.68, AT = 1.67, CG = 0.85, CT = 5.43, and GT = 1.00. Gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.256278, and the tree length = 2.405501. The best-scoring RAxML tree was constructed with a final ML optimization likelihood value of - 14773.67. The final tree topologies of ML and BYPP analyses were consistent. The best-scoring RAxML tree, based on combined LSU, ITS, and mtSSU sequence datasets, is presented in Fig. 2. The newly collected specimen clusters within the Sclerococcum clade and is closely related to S. ricasoliae.

Figure 2. 

RAxML analysis of Dactylosporaceae based on the combined LSU, ITS and mtSSU sequence data. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (ML ≥ 70%), and the Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (PP ≥ 0.90) are shown near the nodes as ML/PP. Caliciopsis orientalis (CBS 138.64) and Caliciopsis pinea (AFTOL-ID 1869) were used as outgroups. The newly generated sequence is in red bold font.

Taxonomy

Lijiangomyces Meng & Jayaward., gen. nov.

Etymology.

The genus name “Lijiangomyces” refers to “Lijiang”, the city in Yunnan Province of China from where the holotype was collected.

Description.

Sexual morph: Ascomata hysterothecia, superficial, solitary, dispersed, sessile, obovoid to broadly shell-shaped or irregularly rounded, with a broadly open or slit-like disc. Margin black, vertically erect, fragile, with the disc surface appearing yellowish-brown. Peridium carbonaceous, black in the lateral and upper regions. Hymenium hyaline to slightly yellowish, with a densely packed hamathecium. Paraphyses filiform, hyaline, non-anastomosed, and non-septate. Hypothecium slightly yellowish. Asci bitunicate, 8-spored, elongated to clavate, with a rounded apex lacking ascal wall thickening, I-, K-. Ascospores uniseriate, arranged obliquely and parallelly, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, fusiform to ellipsoidal, K-, I+ dark blue, aseptate at immature, becoming muriform at maturity with 4–7 transverse septa and 1–2 longitudinal septa. Asexual morph: Not observed.

Type species.

Lijiangomyces laojunensis Meng & Jayaward.

Notes.

The genus is distinguished by black, broadly shell-shaped to irregularly rounded hysterothecial ascomata, with a broadly open or occasionally closed disc, typically light brown to flesh-yellow. Asci are elongated to clavate, containing eight uniseriate, hyaline, and muriform ascospores. Phylogenetic analysis places this genus within the family Mytilinidiaceae (Mytilinidiales, Dothideomycetes) closely related to Mytilinidion. In the single-gene phylogenies, the new species is positioned outside the Mytilinidia sensu stricto clade in the ITS and LSU trees but clusters within it in the tef1-α tree. However, in the concatenated analysis combining all three genes, it is again placed outside the Mytilinidia sensu stricto clade. These results support its recognition as a distinct lineage within Mytilinidiaceae. Morphologically, this genus differs significantly from Mytilinidion in having obovoid to broadly shell-shaped or irregularly rounded, with broadly open ascomata (vs. globoid to obovoid, conchate, or dolabrate ascomata with narrow slit-like openings) and hyaline and muriform ascospores (vs. hyaline to brown and transverse septa). In addition, this genus shares similar morphology with Ostreola in having muriform ascospores but differs in the broadly shell-shaped or irregularly rounded ascomata (vs. conchiform to hatchet-shaped), a broad disc opening (vs. narrowly slit-like), and hyaline ascospores (vs. brown).

Lijiangomyces laojunensis Meng & Jayaward., sp. nov.

Fig. 3

Etymology.

The species epithet “laojunensis” refers to the type locality “Laojun Mountain National Nature Reserve” in Yunnan Province of China.

Figure 3. 

Lijiangomyces laojunensis sp. nov., (KUN-L 88703) a, b habitat c–e ascomata (arrows) f–h section of ascomata in water i–k asci in water l, m asci in IKI n paraphyses in water o–u ascospores in water. Scale bars: 500 μm (e); 200 μm (f, g); 50 μm (h); 25 μm (i–n); 10 μm (o–u).

Holotype.

KUN-L 88703.

Description.

Sexual morph: Ascomata hysterothecia, (0.8–)0.88–1.05(–1.1) × (0.4–)0.47–0.78(–0.8) mm (x– = 0.97 × 0.63, n = 10), superficial, solitary, dispersed, sessile, non-stromatic, obovoid to broadly shell-shaped or irregularly rounded, with a broadly open or slit-like disc. Margin black, vertically erect, fragile, with a yellowish-brown, slightly depressed disc surface appearing below the rim of the lateral wall. Peridium 70–100 μm thick, carbonaceous, black laterally and apically, transitioning to grayish near the base. Hymenium 350–400 μm high, hyaline to slightly yellowish, densely packed with hamathecium. Paraphyses 1–2 μm wide, unbranched, hyaline, non-anastomosed, non-septate. Hypothecium 35–50 μm thick, slightly yellowish. Asci (120–)122.6–168.7(–190) × (13–)13.4–16.5(–18) μm (x– = 145.7 × 14.9, n = 10), bitunicate, 8-spored, elongated to clavate, rounded apex, without apical thickening of ascal wall, K-, I-. Ascospores (20–)20.9–28.8(–37.5) × (9–)10.1–15.4(–17.5) (x– = 24.8 × 12.8, n = 30) μm, K-, I+ reddish brown, then turning to dark blue, uniseriate, arranged obliquely and parallelly, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, fusiform to ellipsoidal, aseptate at immature, becoming muriform at maturity with 4–7 transverse septa and 1–2 longitudinal septa, sometimes slightly constricted at the median septum, rounded at the ends in aged ascospores. Asexual morph: Not observed.

Material examined.

China • Yunnan Province, Lijiang City, Laojun Mountain National Nature Reserve, 26°39'N, 99°43'E, 3900 m elev., on the bark of Abies fabri (Pinaceae), 10 Apr 2022, Qing-feng Meng, ljs-52 (holotype KUN-L 88703).

Notes.

Lijiangomyces laojunensis closely resembles Ostreola consociata (the type species of Ostreola) and O. sessilis, in having cylindrical asci and uniseriate muriform ascospores. However, the new species is distinguished by its ascomatal morphology, which is broadly shell-shaped or irregularly rounded with a widely opened disc, in contrast to Ostreola species which have conchiform to hatchet-shaped ascomata with a narrow slit-like opening. Furthermore, the ascospores of the new species are hyaline and larger in size (20.9–28.8 × 10.1–15.4 μm), in contrast, brown and smaller ascospores (14–22 × 6–8 μm) are the characteristic feature of Ostreola (Darker 1963).

Phylogenetic analysis places this species as a sister clade to Mytilinidion, however, it can be distinguished by its obovoid to broadly shell-shaped or irregularly rounded ascomata (vs. globoid to obovoid, erect, conchate, or dolabrate), and hyaline and muriform ascospores (vs. hyaline to dark brown and transversely septate) (Boehm et al. 2009b; Jayasiri et al. 2018).

Sclerococcum stictae Meng, Diederich & Thiyagaraja, sp. nov.

Fig. 4

Etymology.

The species epithet “stictae” refers to “Sticta”, the host lichen on which the holotype was found.

Figure 4. 

Sclerococcum stictae sp. nov., growing on the thallus of Sticta sp. (KUN-L 88687) a, b habitat and appearance of the host lichen c, d appearance of the apothecia e, f section of apothecium in water g immature ascus in water h mature ascus with ascospores in water i asci in I j–o ascospores in water. Scale bars: 1 mm (c); 200 μm (d); 100 μm (e); 50 μm (f); 10 μm (g–i); 5 μm (j–o).

Holotype.

KUN-L 88687.

Description.

Sexual morph: Ascomata apothecioid, 200–300 μm in diam., rounded, cup-shaped, sessile, erumpent from the host thallus with a narrow base, 170–200 μm in diam., either dispersed or occurring in small groups, black, matte. Disc flat, black. Margin distinct, persistent, and concolorous with the disc. Exciple brown, paraplectenchymatous, laterally 40–70 μm wide. Epithecium (12–)14.3–21.0(–24) μm thick (x– = 17.7, n = 30), with dark brownish granules. Hymenium (46–)65.2–94.8(–96) μm high (x– = 80, n = 30), light brown, and distinctly gelatinized, K/I+ reddish with bluish in epihymenium. Paraphyses 2–3 μm wide, anastomosing, branched, septate, with swollen, pigmented apices. Hypothecium (86–)89.6–95.2(–97) μm thick (x– = 92.4, n = 30), dark orange-brown, with irregularly shaped hypothecial cells. Asci (40–)44.8–67.9(–72) × (7–)7.8–11.9(–12) μm (x– = 56.3 × 9.9, n = 10), bitunicate, narrowly clavate to cylindrical, ascus wall thickened at the apex, ocular chamber absent, 8-spored, K/I-, except for the K/I+ blue outer gelatinous coat, most intensely colored around the ascus apex. Ascospores (8–)9.2–11.1(–12) × (5–)5.1–6.2(–7) μm (x– = 10.1 × 5.6, n = 30), l/w ratio = (1.5–)1.7–1.9(–2) (x– = 1.8, n = 30), brown when mature, 1-septate, slightly constricted at the septum, verrucose, slightly asymmetric with a larger upper cell, ellipsoidal, sometimes soleiform. Asexual morph: Not observed.

Material examined.

China • Yunnan Province, Diqing Autonomous Prefecture, Meili Mountain National Nature Reserve, 28°24'N, 98°48'E, 3300 m elev., on the thallus of Sticta sp., on the bark of Rhododendron lapponicum (Ericaceae), 21 Apr 2023, Qing-feng Meng, ml-68 (holotype KUN-L 88687).

Notes.

Sclerococcum stictae clusters within a well-supported subclade along with S. ricasoliae and S. lobariellum. The basepair comparison with S. ricasoliae revealed 7.5% differences (34/455 bp) in ITS, 2.2% (19/855 bp) differences in LSU, and 1% (7/730 bp) differences in mtSSU sequences (Flakus et al. 2019). Compared to S. lobariellum, it exhibits 4.21% differences (36/855 bp) in LSU and 1.1% (8/730) in mtSSU. Morphologically, S. stictae resembles S. ricasoliae in its ascomatal and ascospore appearance but can be distinguished by its longer, narrower asci (c. 45–68 × 8–12 μm vs. 35–50 × 10–15 μm) and broader ascospores (c. 9–11 μm vs 4–6 μm), with a smaller length/width ratio (1.7–1.9 vs. 1.5–3.5) (Flakus et al. 2019). Phylogenetically, S. stictae is also related to S. lobariellum, but the basepair comparison revealed 4.3% (37/855 bp) differences in LSU and 1.1% (8/730 bp) differences in mtSSU sequences (Hafellner 1979). Hence based on recommendations outlined by Jeewon and Hyde (2016), the establishment of the new species is supported. Diederich et al. (2024) have shown that both Sclerococcum lobariellum and S. ricasoliae possess an asexual stage producing dark brown, dispersed, muriform conidia, often co-occurring with the sexual stage. In all other known lichenicolous Sclerococcum species with an asexual stage, conidia are produced within compact sporodochia, and this stage is never accompanied by a sexual stage. We anticipate, therefore, that an asexual stage with dispersed, muriform conidia also exists in the new S. stictae and should be searched for when more specimens become available.

Another species, Sclerococcum dendriscostictae, also found on Sticta, shares morphological traits with S. stictae. However, the new species can be distinguished by its longer asci (c. 45–68 × 8–12 μm vs. 33–44 × 9.5–13.5 μm) and verrucose ascospore ornamentation, in contrast to smooth-walled ascospores reported in S. dendriscostictae (Joshi 2021).

Discussion

Hysteriaceous fungi are distinguished by their persistent, carbonaceous, navicular pseudothecia with a longitudinal slit opening. Historically, the mytilinidiaceous fungi, which possess fragile, shell-shaped pseudothecia that dehisce through a longitudinal cristate apex, were considered part of the hysteriaceous. However, Boehm et al. (2009a, 2009b) reclassified these fungi based on phylogenetic analyses, leading to the establishment of the order Mytilinidiales.

In our phylogenetic analysis, six genera within Mytilinidiales form a distinct yet complex clade. Mytilinidion is split into two subclades, indicating its polyphyletic nature. This is consistent with the previous study by Boehm et al. (2009a). One subclade includes four species of Mytilinidion alongside all Lophium species, forming a well-supported Lophium-Mytilinidion clade. The other subclade contains eight Mytilinidion species with our new collection, although this grouping is weakly supported. Morphologically, Mytilinidion species are defined by globoid to obovoid, conchate, or dolabrate ascomata with narrow slit-like openings, bitunicate, 8-spored asci, and hyaline to dark brown ascospores with 3–5(–7) transverse septa (Boehm et al. 2009b; Jayasiri et al. 2018). However, our new species displays distinct morphological features that diverge significantly from those of Mytilinidion, supporting its exclusion from this genus based on both phylogenetic and morphological evidence.

Hyde et al. (2024) accepted one family and eleven genera within Mytilinidiales, most of which lack muriform septation except Ostreola which was introduced by Darker (1963). Although molecular evidence for Ostreola remains unavailable, our new species shares features with it, such as cylindrical asci and uniseriate muriform ascospores but differs from Ostreola in having broadly opened hysterothecia, while Ostreola exhibits narrow, slit-like openings. Additionally, Ostreola typically has dull-brown muriform spores, whereas our species is distinguished by its hyaline muriform ascospore (Harkness and Cooke 1878; Darker 1963; Tilak and Kale 1968; Rao and Modak 1972; Barr 1987).

Phylogenetic analysis further positions our new species at a significant distance from the recently described genus Bullatosporium (Andreasen et al. 2024). Apart from the six genera included in our phylogenetic analysis, four additional genera within the family, viz. Actidium, Camaroglobulus, Peyronelia, and Zoggium lack molecular data but exhibit distinct morphological characteristics. Actidium is characterized by simple, rounded spores (Fries 1815). Camaroglobulus was introduced as the asexual morph of Mytilinidion resinae, though its taxonomic placement requires further molecular confirmation (Speer 1986). Peyronelia is defined by brown, fusiform conidia that form short chains of slender, septate, interconnected cells (Ciferri and Fragoso-Romualdo 1927) and Zoggium features broadly filiform or vermiform spores that are transversely septate and pale-colored (Vasilyeva 2001).

Given these morphological and phylogenetic distinctions, the establishment of a new genus to accommodate our newly identified species is both necessary and justified. This classification will provide a clearer framework for understanding diversity within the order Mytilinidiales.

The holotype of Lijiangomyces laojunensis exhibits another intriguing feature: the base of its apothecium is surrounded by the thallus of Pertusaria sp. This phenomenon has led us to mistakenly identify it as a lichenicolous species. Although lichenicolous behavior was not confirmed in this study, the close physical association suggests that the two fungi coexist without conflict. It is also possible that lichenicolous species may be identified as more specimens are collected and studied in the future.

Before 2018, Dactylospora and Sclerococcum were considered distinct genera, with Sclerococcum containing 21 species, 19 of which were lichenicolous. Diederich et al. (2018) synonymized Dactylospora with Sclerococcum and transferred 46 species from Dactylospora to Sclerococcum. Subsequently, Olariaga et al. (2019) transferred 14 non-lichenicolous species of Dactylospora to Sclerococcum. Johnston (2022) introduced six new saprophytic species of Sclerococcum. Since 2018, ten new lichenicolous species and three combinations have been added to the genus (Elix et al. 2019; Flakus et al. 2019; Fryday 2019; Navarro-Rosinés and Romero 2019; Spribille et al. 2020; Joshi 2021; Zhurbenko 2022; Paz-Bermúdez et al. 2023; Diederich et al. 2024; Zhurbenko and Diederich 2024). Diederich et al. (2024) have accepted a total of 85 species in Sclerococcum, with 64 lichenicolous species and the remainder being saprotrophs on liverworts, wood, and bark in both terrestrial and marine habitats (Dong et al. 2020; Thiyagaraja et al. 2022).

The first study of Sclerococcum in China was conducted by Thiyagaraja et al. (2022), who reported a new geographical record of S. simplex, collected from a corticolous Pertusaria thallus in Yunnan province. Ma et al. (2023) described the lignicolous asexual species, S. pseudobactrodesmium from Guizhou Province. Meng et al. (2024) reported a new geographical record of S. glaucomarioides found on Ochrolechia akagiensis from China. This study provides an additional new Sclerococcum species from China.

Acknowledgments

Qingfeng Meng thanks Thesis Writing Grant of Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand. Vinodhini Thiyagaraja thanks Chinese Research Fund (project no E1644111K1) entitled “Flexible introduction of high-level expert program, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences’’, Yunnan Province “Caiyun Postdoctoral Program” in 2023, Choi Wan Postdoctoral Program 2023 and National Postdoctoral funding, China. RS Jayawardena would like to thank the Eminent scholar offered by Kyun Hee University.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This study was supported by Zunyi Scientific and Technological Innovation Talent Team Training Project (ZSK-RC-[2023]8), Zunyi, Guizhou, China; Zunyi Medical University Academic new seedling cultivation and innovation project (Qian Ke He Fundamental [2017] 5733-063), Zunyi, Guizhou, China.

Author contributions

Qingfeng Meng and Ruvishika S. Jayawardena designed the experiments and structured the manuscript. Qingfeng Meng conducted the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. Shaobin Fu provided funding. Paul Diederich, Vinodhini Thiyagaraja, Ruvishika S. Jayawardena, and Damien Ertz contributed to data analysis and manuscript revision. Xinyu Wang, Natsaran Saichana, Kevin D. Hyde, and Shaobin Fu revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed, edited, and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

Author ORCIDs

Qingfeng Meng https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9814-8238

Paul Diederich https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0357-7414

Vinodhini Thiyagaraja https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-4579

Damien Ertz https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8746-3187

Xinyu Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2166-6111

Natsaran Saichana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4357-7980

Kevin D. Hyde https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-0762

Ruvishika S. Jayawardena https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7702-4885

Shaobin Fu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9932-1346

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Andreasen M, Jordal JB, Nordén B (2024) Bullatosporium taxicola, a new genus and species in Mytilinidiaceae (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes) from western Norway. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 14: 197–207. https://doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2024.14.13
  • Barr ME (1987) New Taxa and Combinations in the Loculoascomycetes. Mycotaxon 29: 501–505.
  • Boehm EW, Mugambi GK, Miller AN, Huhndorf SM, Marincowitz S, Spatafora JW, Schoch CL (2009a) A molecular phylogenetic reappraisal of the Hysteriaceae, Mytilinidiaceae and Gloniaceae (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes) with keys to world species. Studies in Mycology 64: 49–83. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2009.64.03
  • Boehm EW, Schoch CL, Spatafora JW (2009b) On the evolution of the Hysteriaceae and Mytilinidiaceae (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) using four nuclear genes. Mycological Research 113(4): 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2008.12.001
  • Capella-Gutierrez S, Silla-Martinez JM, Gabaldon T (2009) trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25(15): 1972–1973. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348
  • Ciferri R, Fragoso-Romualdo G (1927) Hongos parásitos y saprofitos de la República Dominicana Boletin de la Real Sociedad EspaÑola de Historia Natural, Vol. 27. Madrid, 323–336.
  • Diederich P, Ertz D, Lawrey JD, Sikaroodi M, Untereiner WA (2013) Molecular data place the hyphomycetous lichenicolous genus Sclerococcum close to Dactylospora (Eurotiomycetes) and S. parmeliae in Cladophialophora (Chaetothyriales). Fungal Diversity 58(1): 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-012-0179-4
  • Diederich P, Lawrey JD, Ertz D (2018) The 2018 classification and checklist of lichenicolous fungi, with 2000 non-lichenized, obligately lichenicolous taxa. The Bryologist 121(3): 340–425. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745-121.3.340
  • Diederich P, Ertz D, Etayo J, Zhurbenko MP (2024) Sclerococcum. Flora of Lichenicolous Fungi 2: 360–390.
  • Dong W, Hyde KD, Doilom M, Yu X-D, Bhat DJ, Jeewon R, Boonmee S, Wang G-N, Nalumpang S, Zhang H (2020) Pseudobactrodesmium (Dactylosporaceae, Eurotiomycetes, Fungi) a novel lignicolous genus. Frontiers in Microbiology 11: 456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00456
  • Elix J, Mccarthy PM, Hafellner J (2019) A new lichenicolous species of Sclerococcum (Dactylosporaceae, Ascomycota) from south-eastern Australia. Australasian Lichenology 85: 43–45.
  • Flakus A, Etayo J, Miadlikowska J, Lutzoni F, Kukwa M, Matura N, Rodriguez-Flakus P (2019) Biodiversity assessment of ascomycetes inhabiting Lobariella lichens in Andean cloud forests led to one new family, three new genera and 13 new species of lichenicolous fungi. Plant and Fungal Systematics 64(2): 283–344. https://doi.org/10.2478/pfs-2019-0022
  • Fries EM (1819) Novitiae florae suecicae. Nov Fl Suec 5: 79.
  • Fries EM (1825) Systema orbis vegetabilis: Primas lineas novae constructionis periclitatur Elias Fries, Vol. 1. e Typographia academica.
  • Fryday A (2019) Corrections to reports of buellioid lichens from New Zealand’s subantarctic islands, including Sclerococcum thelotrematicola comb. nov. and Epilichen scabrosus new to the southern hemisphere. Australasian Lichenology 84: 26–32.
  • Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59(3): 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010
  • Hafellner J (1979) Karschia. Revision einer Sammelgattung an der Grenze von lichenisierten und nichtlichenisierten Ascomyceten. Beih Nova Hedwigia 62: 1–248.
  • Harkness HW, Cooke MC (1878) Californian fungi. Grevillea 7: 1–4.
  • Hoang DT, Chernomor O, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS (2018) UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(2): 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281
  • Hongsanan S, Hyde KD, Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe DN, Mckenzie E, Sarma V, Boonmee S, Lücking R, Bhat D, Liu N, Tennakoon D, Pem D, Karunarathna A, Jiang S, Jones E, Phillips A, Manawasinghe I, Tibpromma S, Jayasiri S, Sandamali D, Jayawardena R, Wijayawardene N, Ekanayaka A, Jeewon R, Lu Y, Dissanayake A, Zeng X, Luo Z, Tian Q, Phukhamsakda C, Thambugala K, Dai D, Chethana K, Samarakoon M, Ertz D, Bao D, Doilom M, Liu J, Pérez-Ortega S, Suija A, Senwanna C, Wijesinghe S, Konta S, Niranjan M, Zhang S, Ariyawansa H, Jiang H, Zhang J, Norphanphoun C, De Silva N, Thiyagaraja V, Zhang H, Bezerra J, Miranda-González R, Aptroot A, Kashiwadani H, Harishchandra D, Sérusiaux E, Aluthmuhandiram J, Abeywickrama P, Devadatha B, Wu H, Moon K, Gueidan C, Schumm F, Bundhun D, Mapook A, Monkai J, Chomnunti P, Suetrong S, Chaiwan N, Dayarathne M, Yang J, Rathnayaka A, Bhunjun C, Xu J, Zheng J, Liu G, Feng Y, Xie N (2020) Refined families of Dothideomycetes: Dothideomycetidae and Pleosporomycetidae. Mycosphere 11(1): 1553–2107. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/13
  • Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Ariyawansa HA, Bhat J, Buyck B, Cai L, Dai Y-C, Abd-Elsalam KA, Ertz D, Hidayat I, Jeewon R, Jones EBG, Bahkali AH, Karunarathna SC, Liu J-K, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lumbsch HT, Maharachchikumbura SSN, McKenzie EHC, Moncalvo J-M, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Nilsson H, Pang K-L, Pereira OL, Phillips AJL, Raspé O, Rollins AW, Romero AI, Etayo J, Selçuk F, Stephenson SL, Suetrong S, Taylor JE, Tsui CKM, Vizzini A, Abdel-Wahab MA, Wen T-C, Boonmee S, Dai DQ, Daranagama DA, Dissanayake AJ, Ekanayaka AH, Fryar SC, Hongsanan S, Jayawardena RS, Li W-J, Perera RH, Phookamsak R, de Silva NI, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Wijayawardene NN, Zhao R-L, Zhao Q, Kang J-C, Promputtha I (2015) The faces of fungi database: Fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts. Fungal Diversity 74(1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0351-8
  • Jeewon R, Hyde K (2016) Establishing species boundaries and new taxa among fungi: Recommendations to resolve taxonomic ambiguities. Mycosphere 7(11): 1669–1677. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/7/11/4
  • Johnston P (2022) Nomenclatural novelties. Index Fungorum : Published Numbers 519: 1–6.
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, Von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Katoh K, Standley D (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Kirschstein W (1924) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Ascomyceten. Verhandlungen des Botanischen Vereins der Provinz Brandenburg 66: 23–29.
  • Lumbsch HT, Huhndorf SM (2007) Outline of Ascomycota—2007. Myconet 13: 1–58.
  • Ma J, Liu N-G, Tang X, Xiao X-J, Chen X-M, Xiao Y-P, Zhang Y-Z, Lu Y-Z, Boonmee S (2023) Sclerococcum pseudobactrodesmium sp. nov. from a terrestrial habitat in China. Phytotaxa 630(1): 69–79. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.630.1.6
  • Meng Q-F, Thiyagaraja V, Ertz D, Worthy FR, Saichana N, Fu S-B (2024) Sclerococcum glaucomarioides: A new geographical record from China. Phytotaxa 642(1): 95–103. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.642.1.8
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. 2010 gateway computing environments workshop (GCE), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Navarro-Rosinés P, Romero C (2019) Sclerococcum stigma (Dactylosporaceae) una nueva combinación para Dactylospora stigma, un hongo liquenícola olvidado que crece sobre Porpidia macrocarpa. Revista Catalana de Micologia 40: 35–42.
  • Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Olariaga I, Teres J, Martín J, Prieto M, Baral H-O (2019) Pseudosclerococcum golindoi gen. et sp. nov., a new taxon with apothecial ascomata and a Chalara-like anamorph within the Sclerococcales (Eurotiomycetes). Mycological Progress 18(7): 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-019-01500-7
  • Pem D, Hyde KD, Mckenzie EHC, Hongsanan S, Wanasinghe DN, Boonmee S, Darmostuk V, Bhat JD, Tian Q, Htet ZH, Senanayake IC, Niranjan M, Sarma VV, Doilom M, Dong W (2024) A comprehensive overview of genera in Dothideomycetes. Mycosphere 15(1): 2175–4568. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/18
  • Rao R, Modak CD (1972) Saprophytic fungi on Vitis pallida Wt. & Arn. M V M Patrika 7(1&2): 44–46.
  • Rathnayaka AR, Tennakoon DS, Jones GE, Wanasinghe DN, Bhat DJ, Priyashantha AH, Stephenson SL, Tibpromma S, Karunarathna SC (2024) Significance of precise documentation of hosts and geospatial data of fungal collections, with an emphasis on plant-associated fungi. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2024.2381734
  • Rehner SA, Buckley E (2005) A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: Evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 97(1): 84–98. https://doi.org/10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Senanayake I, Rathnayaka A, Sandamali D, Calabon M, Vedprakash HG (2020) Morphological approaches in studying fungi: collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 11(1): 2678–2754. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere-/11/1/20
  • Speer EO (1986) A propos de champignons du Brésil. III: Mytilinidion resinae sp. nov.(Hysteriales) et sa forme conidienne, Camaroglobulus resinae gen. et spec. nov. (Sphaeropsidales). Bulletin Trimestriel de la Societe Mycologique de France 102(1): 97–100.
  • Spribille T, Fryday AM, Pérez-Ortega S, Svensson M, Tønsberg T, Ekman S, Holien H, Resl P, Schneider K, Stabentheiner E, Thüs H, Vondrák J, Sharman L (2020) Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska. Lichenologist 52(2): 61–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282920000079
  • Thiyagaraja V, Ertz D, Hyde KD, Karunarathna SC, To-Anun C, Cheewangkoon R (2022) Morphological and phylogenetic reassessment of Sclerococcum simplex from China. Phytotaxa 559(2): 167–175. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.559.2.5
  • Thiyagaraja V, He SC, Luo L, Meng QF, Yang H, Yang YY (2024) Research Profiles – I. The research of Vinodhini Thiyagaraja and her team at Kunming Institute of Botany, CAS, P.R. China. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 14(1): 49–62. https://doi.org/10.5943/cream/14/1/2 [Journal of Fungal Biology]
  • Tilak ST, Kale SB (1968) Contributions to the genus Ostreola. Indian Phytopathology 21(3): 289–293.
  • Vasilyeva L (2001) Hysteriaceous fungi in the Russian Far East. IV. Glyphium, Lophium and Mytilinidion. Mikologiia I Fitopatologiia 35(1): 15–18.
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172(8): 4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
  • Zoller S, Scheidegger C, Sperisen C (1999) PCR primers for the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA of lichen-forming Ascomycetes. Lichenologist 31(5): 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1006/lich.1999.0220
login to comment