Research Article
Print
Research Article
Two novel Tuber species (Tuberaceae, Pezizales) from southwestern China based on morphological and molecular evidence
expand article infoTian-Jun Yuan§, Hong-Mei Luo, Kai-Mei Su, Shu-Hong Li, E-Xian Li
‡ Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, China
§ Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand
Open Access

Abstract

Based on morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses, two new species, Tuber marroninum and Tuber conditum, belonging to the Latisporum group, were described from Yunnan province of southwest China. Morphologically, Tuber marroninum is distinguished from other Latisporum species by whitish and glabrous ascomata and a two-layered peridium, measuring 150–200 µm in total thickness, with an outer layer ranging from 40–60 µm. Tuber conditum is diagnosed by its thinner peridium (120–200 µm) and larger ascospores (49–66.5 × 34.5–60 μm in one-spored asci). According to the outcome of the ITS rDNA sequence analysis, the species of T. marroninum and T. conditum each form a distinct and well-supported group within the Latisporum group, respectively.

Key words:

Ascomycetes, Latisporum group, new taxa, phylogenetic analysis, taxonomy

Introduction

Tuber F.H. Wigg (Tuberaceae) is one of the most important genera in Pezizales in terms of both ecology and economy. It is widespread in Asia, Europe, and North America (Mello et al. 2006; Jeandroz et al. 2008; Trappe et al. 2009; García-Montero et al. 2010; Bonito et al. 2013; Zambonelli et al. 2016), with a few species also occurring in North Africa (Cacialli 2005). Tuber spp. establish obligate mycorrhizal symbiotic relationships with diverse plant hosts, such as oaks, pines, poplars, and commercially important trees, including chestnut, pecan, and hazelnut (Geng et al. 2009; Trappe et al. 2009; Wan et al. 2015). Not only can mycelium of Tuber spp. provide water and mineral nutrition for their host trees, but these fruiting bodies also contribute to the diet of small forest mammals. Some mycophagous animals are considered major consumers and vectors of hypogeous ectomycorrhizal fungi (Schickmann et al. 2012). Additionally, the fruiting bodies of some species, such as Tuber magnatum, T. melanosporum, T. aestivum, and T. indicum, have high value as a delicious food because of their unique scent. Although edible fungi are an important component of Chinese culture, there appear never to be accounts of Tuber species in ancient Chinese literature (Wang and Liu 2009). Tuber taiyuanense was the first reported species in 1985 in China (Liu 1985). Results of the last 20 years of research have revealed that China is a rich country in truffle diversity (Wang and Liu 2009). More than 60 truffle species have been documented in China, with the majority classified into the Puberulum, Latisporum, Maculatum, Rufum, and Melanosporum groups (http://www.speciesfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp). Tuber species in the Puberulum, Maculatum, and Gibbosum groups were commonly called “whitish truffle” to distinguish them from Italian white truffle, T. magnatum (Bonito et al. 2010; Lancellotti et al. 2016). The Rufum and Melanosporum groups are called “black truffle” (Bonito et al. 2010). In this study, two whitish new truffle species have been discovered in Yunnan province, China.

Materials and methods

Morphological studies

Fresh samples were collected from forests of Pinus yunnanensis Franch. in Yunnan, China. Microscopic and macroscopic characteristics are described based on the specimen materials (L3694 and L3385) following the methods of Yang and Zhang (2003). Color codes were given based on Kornerup and Wanscher (1978). Sections were made with a razor blade by hand, mounted in a 5% (w/v) KOH solution, then lactophenol cotton blue, and examined under an OLYMPUS BH-2 microscope. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), ascospores were scraped from the dried gleba onto double-sided tape and mounted directly on an SEM stub. They were then coated with gold-palladium, examined, and photographed with a JEOL, JMS-5600LV SEM. For evaluation of the range of ascospore size, at least 40 ascospores each from one specimen of each collection site were measured. For ascospores, Q, the length-to-width ratio, is given in the same format as spore dimensions, and Q is the average Q of all specimens ± standard deviation. The specimens were deposited in the herbarium of the Biotechnology and Germplasm Resources Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (YAAS), and the Herbarium of Cryptogams, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (HKAS).

DNA extraction, PCR, and sequencing

Total DNA was extracted from pieces of dried ascomata with a modified CTAB methodology (Hofstetter et al. 2002, Li et al. 2011). Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed using the primer combination ITS4/ITS5 (Hofstetter et al. 2002, Larsson and Sundberg 2011), nuc 28S rDNA subunit (28S) were amplified with primers LROR/LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990), bRPB2-5F/bRPB2-7.1R (Matheny 2005) were used to amplify the second-largest subunits of RNA polymerase II (RPB2) (Sung et al. 2007) and 983F/2212R (Rehner and Buckley 2005) were amplified with primers translation elongation factor 1-α gene (tef-1α). In 25 µL of PCR reaction solution were contained 1 µL of DNA, 1 µL (5 µm) of each primer pair, 2.5 µL of 10 × buffer (Mg2+ plus), 1 µL of dNTP (1 mM), 0.5 µL of BSA (0.1%), 0.5 µL of MgCl2, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Tag, Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China). PCR reactions were run as follows: for the ITS gene, 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 54 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min. The final reaction was followed by an extension at 72 °C for 10 min. For the LSU gene, 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 50 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were sent to Sangon Biotech Corporation (Shanghai, China) for purifying and sequencing by using ITS4/ITS5, LROR/LR5, bRPB2-5F/bRPB2-7.1R, and 983F/2212R, respectively.

Phylogenetic analyses

The Tuber sequences for phylogenetic analysis were obtained in this study and from the GenBank database. A total of 210 sequences (including 202 sequences by collections of Tuber and 8 sequences by sequencing in this study) (Table 1), in which 5 sequences derived from two species of Choiromyces helanshanensis and C. meandriformis were selected and used as outgroups (Figs 1, 2). Sequences were edited and assembled using SeqMan Pro (DNAStar, Inc.). Alignment was performed using the online version of the multiple sequence alignment program MAFFT v7 (Katoh and Standley 2013), applying the G-INS-I strategy, and the alignments were manually adjusted in BioEdit. Poorly aligned sites were identified, and ambiguous sites were excluded by Gblocks v. 0.91b (Castresana 2000; using default options except “Allowed Gap Postions” = half) with default parameters. The multiple sequence alignments of both ITS-LSU-RPB2-TEF1 and ITS1 + 5.8S + ITS2 (based on the sequence of Tuber glabrum NR_153217, Fan et al. 2014) were carried out, establishing the phylogenetic trees, respectively. A maximum likehood (ML) phylogenetic tree was constructed using RAxML v7.0.3 on the online server accessed at https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/, applying the rapid bootstrapping algorithm for 1000 replications using the GTRGAMMA model (Stamatakis et al. 2005; Stamatakis 2014). Clades with bootstrap values (BS) ≥ 75% were considered as significantly supported (Hillis and Bull 1993). Bayesian inference (BI) was performed using the Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMCMC) method in MrBayes version 3.2.7a (Ronquist et al. 2012), and the GTR + I + G model was selected as the best model under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) implemented by MrModeltest v.2.3 (Nylander 2004). Two independent runs of chains were conducted for 2,000,000 (ITS-nrLSU-RPB2-TEF1) and 1,000,000 (ITS1 + 5.8S + ITS2). The average standard deviations of split frequencies (ASDSF) were less than 0.01 at the end of the run, and ESS (effective sampling size) values were more than 200. Trees were sampled every 100 generations after burn-in (well after convergence), and 50% majority-rule consensus trees were constructed and viewed with TreeView32 (Page 2001). Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 were considered as significant support (Alfaro et al. 2003).

Figure 1. 

Phylogeny generated from maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analysis of the ITS-LUS-TEF1-RPB2 rDNA sequences from Tuber marroninum and T. conditum-related species. Choiromyces helanshanensis and C. meandriformis served as outgroups. ML bootstrap values (>75%) and Posterior Probabilities (PPs) values (>0.90) are shown above or beneath the branches at nodes. Novel sequences are printed in bold.

Figure 2. 

Phylogeny generated from maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analysis of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequences from Tuber marroninum and T. conditum related species. Choiromyces helanshanensis and C. meandriformis served as outgroups. ML bootstrap values (>75%) and Posterior Probabilities (PPs) values (>0.90) are shown above or beneath the branches at nodes. Novel sequences are printed in bold.

Table 1.

Details of the Tuber sequences used in phylogenetic analysis. Sequences newly generated for this study are in bold.

Name Voucher/isolate/strain ITS LSU RPB2 TEF1
C. helanshanensis HKAS_80633 KU531604 OM366182 OM584242 OM649586
C. helanshanensis HKAS_80630 KU531603 OM366202 OM584265 OM649607
C. helanshanensis HKAS_80634 NR_153899 OM366156 OM584208 OM649562
Choiromyces meandriformis RH691 HM485330 FJ809794 JQ954471 JX022550
C. meandriformis GB285 HM485331 OM366158 OM584209 OM649563
T. alboumbilicum YAAS_L2324 NR_155904 OM366174 OM584231 OM649578
T. anniae JT13209 HM485338 JQ925680 / JX022567
T. anniae BJTC_FAN640 OM286868 OM366215 OM584274 OM649620
T. baoshanense BJTC_FAN400 OM256791 OM366197 OM584260 OM649602
T. baoshanense HKAS_88788 NR_178114 OM366176 OM584233 OM649580
T. borchii IFS Y. Wang 89556 DQ478624 OM366222 OM584280 OM649629
T. borchii IFS Y. Wang 89377 DQ478656 / / /
T. badium BJTC FAN381 OM256748 OM366193 OM584256 OM649598
T. badium BJTC FAN371 OM256747 OM366192 OM584255 OM649597
T. borchii BJTC FAN217 KT067681 KT067706 OM584229 KT067717
T. borchii Tbo1 MZ452886 / MZ541897 MZ570608
T. brumale GB53 FJ748900 / / /
T. brumale Tbru-eu02 DQ329359 / / /
T. brumale T.bru-eu03 DQ329360 / / /
T. brunneum JT33836 KT897475 / / /
T. brunneum JT33837 KT897479 / / /
T. buendiae MUB_Fung-0974 NR_171295 / / /
T. buendiae MUB_Fung-0976 MT006097 / / /
T. buendiae MUB_Fung-0977 MT006098 / / /
T. californicum JT28058 HM485346 JQ925685 JQ954496 JX022574
T. californicum JT22590 HM485351 / / /
T. calosporum HKAS_88791 KT444597 / / /
T. calosporum HKAS_88790 KT444598 / / /
T. canaliculatum OSC59072 HM485347 / JQ954498 JX022576
T. canaliculatum JT28215 JQ925643 / JQ954497 JX022575
T. candidum JT21856 HM485348 / / /
T. candidum JT1844 HM485349 / / /
T. caoi BJTC_FAN293 KP276182 KP276198 OM584240 KP276217
T. caoi BJTC_FAN309 KP276181 / / /
T. caoi BJTC_FAN321 KP276180 / / /
T. caoi BJTC_FAN271 KP276183 NG_059984 OM584237 KP276216
T. crassitunicatum BJTC_FAN465 MH115295 NG_088329 OM584268 OM649610
T. crassitunicatum HMAS_88577 MH115297 / / /
T. dryophilum GB35 JQ925644 JQ925687 / JX022577
T. dryophilum GB37 HM485354 JQ925688 JQ954501 JX022578
T. ferrugineum JST22014 KX354297 / / /
T. ferrugineum MUBFung-0972 MN962719 / / /
T. foetidum ZB2452 JQ288905 / / /
T. foetidum ZB2489 JQ288906 / / /
T. formosanum BJTC_FAN107 MF621549 OM366159 OM584210 OM649564
T. formosanum BJTC_FAN356 MF627986 OM366189 OM584252 OM649594
T. furfuraceum HKAS_48272 GU979034 / / /
T. furfuraceum HKAS_49707 GU979049 / / /
T. glabrum BJTC_Fan228 NR_153217 NG_088326 OM584234 OM649581
T. glabrum BJTC_Fan232 KF002727 OM366179 OM584236 /
T. griseolivaceum BJTC_FAN469 KY428921 NG_088330 / OM649612
T. griseolivaceum BJTC_FAN470 KY428923 / / /
T. himalayense CB20001 MW393547 / / /
T. himalayense JJ22045 OQ054615 / / /
T. himalayense JJ22046 OQ054619 / / /
T. hubeiense HMAS_60233 KT067688 / / /
T. huidongense BJTC_FAN103 MH115294 / / /
T. huidongense 885-1 MW201514 / / /
T. huizeanum BJTC_FAN314 KT067685 KT067692 OM584246 KT067712
T. huizeanum BJTC_FAN186 JQ910651 NG_059991 / OM649575
T. indicum T47 JQ639005 / / /
T. indicum T49 JQ639007 / / /
T. jinshajiangense BJTC_FAN124 KP276177 / / /
T. jinshajiangense BJTC_FAN406 KX575841 OM366199 OM584262 OM649604
T. jinshajiangense BJTC_FAN407 KX575842 OM366200 OM584263 OM649605
T. latisporum BJTC_FAN126 KP276189 KP276204 OM584215 KP276205
T. latisporum BJTC_FAN125 KT067676 KT067695 OM584214 KT067725
T. liaotongense OSC87602 HM485369 FJ809813 / JX022589
T. liaotongense BJTC_FAN550 MH115302 OM366213 OM584272 OM649618
T. lijiangense BJTC_FAN307 KP276188 KP276203 OM584244 KP276206
T. lishanense BJTC_FAN683 MH115305 MH115306 OM584275 OM649621
T. lishanense BJTC_FAN718 NR_160619 NG_064527 OM584276 OM649622
T. liui HXZE_984 DQ478636 / / /
T. liui HKAS_48269 DQ898182 / / /
T. liyuanum FAN162 JQ771191.2 KT067698 OM584218 KT067710
T. liyuanum BJTC_FAN187 JQ771193 KT067704 / KT067719
T. longispinosum FFPRI_460530 LC508589 / / /
T. longispinosum FFPRI_460528 LC508587 / / /
T. longispinosum FFPRI_460529 LC508588 / / /
T. lyonii FLASMES-614 MT156453 / / /
T. lyonii FLASMES-615 MT156454 / / /
T. macrosporum JT13362 HM485373 FJ809838 / JX022590
T. macrosporum JT19458 HM485372 / / /
T. maculatum BJTC_FAN868 OM265274 OM366227 OM584283 OM649634
T. maculatum BJTC_FAN876 OM265278 OM366228 OM584284 OM649635
T. malacodermum JT32319 FJ809889 JQ925702 JQ954514 JX022593
T. marroninum YAAS_L3694 ON454668 ON428904 OQ305202 OQ305199
T. marroninum YAAS_L3695 OQ297680 / / /
T. melanosporum MEL437_clone_25A EU555389 / / /
T. melanosporum MEL437_clone_26A EU555390 / / /
T. microsphaerosporum BJTC_Fan152 KF805726 / / /
T. microsphaerosporum BJTC_FAN152 KP276187 / / KP276207
T. microspiculatum BJTC_FAN220 MH115315 / / /
T. microspiculatum BJTC_FAN138 MH115317 / / /
T. nitidum BM105 FJ809885 FJ809807 JQ954517 JX022597
T. nitidum MUB:Fung-0934 MN962721 / / /
T. nitidum MUB:Fung-0935 MN962722 / / /
T. oligospermum AH39336 JN392267 / / /
T. oligospermum AH39337 JN392268 / / /
T. oligospermum AH39338 JN392266 / / /
T. panzhihuanense DXJ277 JQ978651 / / /
T. panzhihuanense DXJ278 JQ978652 / / /
T. panzhihuanense HKAS_72015 NR_120126 / / /
T. parvomurphium BJTC_FAN323 KP276185 KP276191 / KP276215
T. parvomurphium BJTC_FAN298 KP276186 NG_059981 OM584241 KP276214
T. piceatum HMAS_97125 NR_160620 / / /
T. piceatum HMAS_97124 MH115320 / / /
T. polymorphosporum HKAS_88793 NR_178113 / / /
T. polymorphosporum BJTC_FAN413 OM256794 / / /
T. polymorphosporum BJTC_FAN544 OM256802 / / /
T. pseudobrumale BJTC_FAN306 OM287838 / / /
T. pseudobrumale BJTC_FAN322 OM287839 / / /
T. pseudobrumale YAAS_L3181 KJ742703 / / /
T. pseudoexcavatum CJ408 HM485381 / / /
T. pseudoexcavatum T14_HKAS_44325b GU979039 / / /
T. pseudoexcavatum T29_HKAS_44324b GU979040 / / /
T. pseudoexcavatum HKAS_44346 GU979041 / / /
T. pseudoexcavatum T18_HKAS_49851 GU979043 / / /
T. pseudoexcavatum T31_HKAS_47617 GU979045 / / /
T. pseudoexcavatum T80_HKAS_49747 GU979046 / / /
T. pseudoexcavatum HKAS 86489 MG871289 / / /
T. pseudohimalayense BJTC_FAN122 MF627983 / / /
T. pseudohimalayense BJTC_FAN297 OM287837 / / /
T. pseudohimalayense BJTC_FAN328 OM287840 / / /
T. pseudohimalayense BJTC_FAN354 OM287844 / / /
T. pseudohimalayense BJTC_FAN541 OM287847 / / /
T. pseudohimalayense mhll-10 MT446223 / / /
T. pseudohimalayense mhll-11 MT446224 / / /
T. pseudomagnatum BJTC_FAN163 JQ771192 KP276192 OM584219 KP276208
T. pseudomagnatum BJTC_FAN299 KP276184 / / /
T. pseudomagnatum BJTC_FAN391 OM265244 OM366195 OM584258 OM649600
T. pseudosphaerosporum BJTC_FAN250 NR_153229 NG_059982 / OM649584
T. pseudosphaerosporum BJTC_FAN394 OM256789 / / /
T. puberulum ZB1341 JF261381 / / /
T. puberulum ZB1433 JF261382 / / /
T. pustulatum AQUI_9725 MK211278 / / /
T. pustulatum AQUI_9726 MK211279 / / /
T. rapaeodorum IFS Y. Wang 89719 DQ478651 / / /
T. rapaeodorum IFS Y. Wang 870202 DQ478654 / / /
T. qujingense HKAS 95823 KX904885 / / /
T. rapaeodorum ZB452 JF261396 / / /
T. rapaeodorum ZB466 JF261397 / / /
T. regimontanum ITCV_909 EU375838 NG_059920 JQ954520 JX022600
T. rufum FLAS-F-65583 MT374049 / / /
T. rufum FLAS-F-65584 MT374050 / / /
T. shidianense HKAS_88770 KT444595 / / /
T. shidianense HKAS_88771 KT444596 / / /
T. sinense BJTC_FAN108 MF627968 OM366160 OM584211 OM649565
T. sinense BJTC_FAN110 MF627970 OM366161 OM584212 OM649566
T. sinoalbidum BJTC_FAN105 MH115298 / / /
T. sinomonosporum BJTC_Fan150 KF002729 / / /
T. sinosphaerosporum BJTC_FAN136 JX092087 KP276196 / KP276211
T. sinosphaerosporum BJTC_FAN135 JX092086 NG_059983 OM584217 OM649569
Tuber sp. 2 KA-2010 K22 AB553345 / / /
Tuber sp. 2 KA-2010 K108 AB553349 / / /
Tuber sp. 2 KA-2010 K205 AB553353 / / /
Tuber sp. 2 KA-2010 K445 AB553366 / / /
Tuber sp. 2 KA-2010 K446 AB553367 / / /
T. songlu HKAS_95771 KX904883 / / /
T. songlu HKAS_95777 KX904884 / / /
T. songlu HKAS_95851 KX904886 / / /
T. sphaerosporum JT12487 FJ809853 FJ809805 / JX022609
T. sphaerosporum JT19772 FJ809854 / / /
T. conditum YAAS_L3385 ON454665 ON428901 / /
T. conditum YAAS_L3682 ON454667 / / /
T. spinoreticulatum RH158 GQ221454 / / /
T. spinoreticulatum U188 FJ809884 FJ809815 JQ954527 JX022608
T. subglobosum BJTC_FAN222 KF002728 OM366175 OM584232 OM649579
T. subglobosum BJTC_FAN432 MH115323 / / /
T. taiyuanense T42_HM75888 GU979033 / / /
T. taiyuanense BJTC_FAN210 OM311199 / / /
T. texense JT15162 HM485391 / / /
T. thailandicum CMU-B31 MW470964 / / /
T. thailandicum CMU-B33 MW470967 / / /
T. theleascum AQUI_9729 MK211283 / / /
T. theleascum AQUI_9730 MK211284 / / /
T. theleascum ITCV_908 NR_164592 / / /
T. tomentosum K126 AB553447 / / /
T. tomentosum K200 AB553449 / / /
T. tomentosum K409 AB553450 / / /
T. tomentosum K410 AB553451 / / /
T. tomentosum K412 AB553452 / / /
T. tomentosum K413 AB553453 / / /
T. tomentosum K414 AB553454 / / /
T. tomentosum K415 AB553455 / / /
T. tomentosum K199 AB553448 AB553521 AB553561 AB553541
T. pseudoexcavatum YAAS_L3932 ON454670 / / OQ305200
T. pseudoexcavatum YAAS_L3933 OQ297681 / / /
T. umbilicatum T2_HKAS_44316 GU979031 / / /
T. umbilicatum T30_HKAS_48267 GU979032 / / /
T. umbilicatum BJTC_FAN225 MH115325 / / /
T. variabilisporum BJTC_FAN330 OM287841 / / /
T. vesicoperidium BJTC_FAN155 JQ690071 JQ690068 / KP276212
T. vesicoperidium L156 JQ690072 / / /
T. wanglangense IFS Y.Wang_610 DQ478637 / / /
T. wenchuanense HMAS_60239 JX267044 / / /
T. wenchuanense BJTC_FAN833 OM311256 / / /
T. calosporum YAAS_L3648 ON454666 ON428902 OQ305201 OQ305198
T. calosporum YAAS_L3684 OQ297679 / / /
T. xuanhuaense BJTC_FAN618 MK045627 OM366214 OM584273 OM649619
T. xuanhuaense BJTC_FAN887 MK045644 / / /
T. xuanhuaense BJTC_FAN886 MK045645 / / /
T. xuanhuaense HMAS_60213 NR_147436 / / /
T. yigongense BJTC_FAN731 MF663714 / / /
T. yigongense BJTC_FAN729 MF663716 / OM584277 OM649623
T. zambonelliae MUB_Fung-1006 MW632954 / / /
T. zambonelliae MUB_Fung-1007 MW632955 / / /
T. zambonelliae MUB_Fung-0995 NR_174649 / / /
T. zhongdianense BJTC_FAN176 KP276178 / / /
T. zhongdianense BJTC_FAN178 KT067679 / / /
T. zhongdianense BJTC_FAN182 KT067680 KT067702 / KT067721
T. zhongdianense BJTC_FAN189 KT067689 KT067705 / KT067718

Results

Molecular phylogenetics

The phylograms of ITS-nrLUS-RPB2-TEF1 (446 bp, 850 bp, 902 bp, and 814 bp, respectively) and ITS1 + 5.8S + ITS2 (446 bp) sequences are shown in Fig. 1, and Fig. 2, respectively. ML and BI analyses produced similar tree topologies, and only the tree generated from the ML analysis is shown. Both phylograms indicated that specimens of T. marroninum and T. conditum form a monophyletic clade, which was distinct from other Tuber species with high BS and PP support. Based on the ITS1 + 5.8S + ITS2 analysis (Fig. 2), T. marroninum and T. conditum stand with the Latisporum clade together with Tuber tomentosum, T. rapaeodorum, T. songlu, T. thailandicum, T. pseudosphaerosporum, T. polymorphosporum, T. panzhihuanense, T. lastisporum, T. baoshanense, T. parvomurphium, T. alboumbilicum, T. griseolivaceum, and T. caoi, and the phylogenetic tree showed their strong bootstrap support values (BS = 100% and PP = 1.0). In this study, two additional specimens of Tuber pseudoexcavatum and Tuber calosporum were collected through morphological and molecular identification (BS = 100% and PP = 1.0) and preserved in the Herbarium of the Institute of Forestry and Soil Sciences (YAAS), implying these two species might be common in the southwest region of China.

Taxonomy

Tuber marroninum T. J. Yuan, S. H. Li & X. H. Wang, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 901881
Fig. 3a–g

Typification.

China • Yunnan Province: Xiangyun County (25°20'768"N, 100°43'34"E), in soil under mixed forest, with Pinus yunnanensis dominant, 20 Sep 2020, S. H. Li L3694 (holotype YAAS L3694, paratype YAAS L3695).

Gene sequences ex holotype.

ON454668 (ITS); ON428904 (LSU); OQ305202 (RPB2); OQ305199 (TEF1); ex paratype: OQ297680 (ITS).

Etymology.

“Marroninum” refers to the maroon color of the ascoma.

Diagnosis.

Tuber marroninum differs from other species by its whitish and glabrous ascomata and maroon color of the ascoma, globose and subglobose or broad ellipsoid ascospores, with greyish-white alveolate-reticulate ornamentation.

Description.

Ascomata (Fig. 3a, b) 3–5 cm diam, subglobose, hypogeous, whitish (3A1-2) becoming brown (8E6-8) when bruised, surface smooth, with white furrows; odor mild, taste not recorded. Peridium (Fig. 3c, d) two-layered, 150–200 µm thick, outer layer 40–60 µm thick, pseudoparenchymatous, composed of subglobose or irregularly shaped cells of 7.5–16.8 (24.5) µm broad with thickened walls, inner layer composed of thin-walled hyaline interwoven hyphae, 2.5–4 (5.5) µm diam, large cells of 20 × 10 µm diam. Sometimes, intermixed. Gleba (Fig. 3b) solid, firm, brown to dark brown (10F6-8) at maturity, marbled with whitish (1A1-1B1) narrow veins. Asci (Fig. 3e, g) subglobose or irregular, 1–4 spored, with a short stalk, 50–75 (100) × 40–55 (80) μm (n = 50). Ascospores (Fig. 3e, g) subglobose to globose, pale yellow (5A2-3, 5B3) when young, becoming brown (5C6-8, 5D6-7) at maturity, excluding their spiny-reticulate ornamentation, 41.5–52 × 41–50 μm, Q = 1.00–1.14 (n = 55), in one-spored asci, 33–41 × 32–40 μm (n = 50), Q = 1.00–1.15, in two-spored asci, 21–37 × 20–35.5 μm, Q = 1.01–1.12 (n = 60), in three-spored asci, 20–35.5 × 18.5–30.5 μm, Q = 1.02–1.15 (n = 60), in four-spored asci, Q = 1.14 ± 0.07, with a greyish white (2B1-2; 1C1-2) reticulatum and alveolate-reticulate ornamentation, meshes 5–8 across the ascospore width, 1.5–3 μm tall.

Figure 3. 

Photographs of Tuber marroninum (YAAS L3694, holotype): a fresh ascomata showing cut section b the gleba c, d vertical section of peridium d the gleba and asci e, f ascospores g scanning electron micrograph of ascospore.

Distribution and habitat.

China: Yunnan province, Xiangyun county, hypogeous, in the soil in mixed woods dominated by Pinus yunnanensis.

Notes.

Tuber marroninum is phylogenetically closely related to T. caoi (Fan et al. 2016). In morphology, T. caoi has gray and pubescent ascomata, but T. marroninum has whitish and glabrous ascomata. Both trees of ML and BI (Figs 1, 2) also have strong bootstrap supporting the new species.

Tuber conditum T. J. Yuan, S. H. Li & X. H. Wang, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 901882
Fig. 4a–f

Typification.

China • Yunnan Province: Changning County (38.3903°N, 102.3535°E), in soil under mixed forest, with Pinus yunnanensis dominant, 20 Sep 2020, S. H. Li L3385 (holotype YAAS L3385, paratype YAAS L3682).

Gene sequences ex holotype.

ON454665 (ITS); ON428901 (LSU); ex paratype: ON454667 (ITS).

Etymology.

Conditum, Latin, refers to the acrid smell of ascocarp.

Diagnosis.

Tuber conditum differs from other species by having no cystidia on surface of ascomata, thinner peridium, and larger ellipsoid ascospores.

Description.

Ascomata (Fig. 4a) 3–4 cm diam., subglobose, hypogeous, grey-white to grey-brown (4A2-4; 4B3-4), surface smooth, with a few pinholes; acrid smell, taste not recorded. Peridium (Fig. 4b) one-layered, 120–200 µm thick, prosenchymatous, composed of interwoven hyphae 1.5–2.5 µm broad with thin-walled, and lumens 1.5–2.5 (3.5) µm diam, with ellipsoid or irregular cells of 15 × 10 μm diam. Sometimes intermixed, wall thickness 1–2 μm. Gleba (Fig. 4a, c) solid, firm, brown to black (6E7-8; (5-9)F8) at maturity, marbled with whitish narrow veins. Asci (Fig. 4d–e) subglobose or irregular, 1–4 spored, hyaline, thin-walled or occasionally with walls as thick as 2 μm, sessile stalk, 55–100 × 45–75 μm (n = 30). Ascospores (Fig. 4d–f) subglobose or ellipsoid, pale yellow (2A2-4), yellow-brown (5D6-8; 5E7-8) at maturity, excluding ornamentation, 49–66.5 × 34.5–60 μm, Q = 1.02–1.58 (n = 54), in one-spored asci, 33–54.5 × 30–47 μm, Q = 1.06–1.35 (n = 50), in two-spored asci, 21.5–44 × 21–37 μm, Q = 1.00–1.26 (n = 60), in three-spored asci, 20.5–40.0 × 20–35.5 μm, Q = 1.01–1.30 (n = 40), in four-spored asci, Q = 1.15 ± 0.23, reticulate ornamentation 2–5 μm in height, composed of irregular hexagonal meshes, 6–8 along the spore length and 3–6 along the breadth.

Figure 4. 

Photographs of Tuber conditum (YAAS L3385, holotype): a fresh ascomata showing cut section b vertical section of peridium c, d the gleba and asci e ascospores f scanning electron micrograph of ascospore.

Distribution and habitat.

China: Yunnan province, Changning county, hypogeous, in the soil in woods dominated by Pinus yunnanensis.

Notes.

Tuber conditum is phylogenetically closely related to Tuber tomentosum (Kinoshita et al. 2011), T. qujingense, and T. songlu (Wan et al. 2021). However, T. conditum has no cystidia on the surface of ascomata and larger ellipsoid ascospores, differing from T. tomentosum (Kinoshita et al. 2011; Sasaki et al. 2016). Tuber conditum differs from T. qujingense and T. songlu by its thinner peridium (120–200 µm) and larger ascospores (49–66.5 × 34.5–60 μm in one-spored asci). Tuber qujingense has a greyish-white ascomata, brown snowflake-shaped gleba, and prosenchymatous peridium, fusiform, and T. songlu has dense spine-like dermatocystidia, which are completely different from each other. In addition, DNA sequence analysis revealed the similarity between two species is less than 82.73% (T. qujingense) and 93% (T. songlu) in ITS sequences, strongly supporting the separation of T. conditum from the Chinese species of T. qujingense and T. songlu. Phylogenetic analysis (Figs 1, 2) also suggested that T. conditum is a distinct species because all sequences of this new species clustered within a strong bootstrap (BS ≥ 99% and PP = 1.0). The truffle has the acrid smell, which might be a good identifying feature for the fungus.

Tuber pseudoexcavatum Y. Wang et al., Cryptogamie Mycologie, 1998, 19(1–2): 113–120 (Manjón et al. 2009; Moreno et al. 1997)

Notes.

The description of Tuber pseudoexcavatum Y. Wang et al. (1998) was originally based on two specimens collected in China and published by Wang et al. in 1998. Subsequently, additional collections (AH 18387, AH 18331) from China were successfully used to generate DNA data, which were deposited in the Herbarium of the Institute of Forestry and Soil Sciences. This study reports two new collections that suggest the presence of this species may not be uncommon in the southwestern region of China. Morphologically, T. pseudoexcavatum is characterized by subglobose ascocarps with a deeply excavate appearance, ranging in color from brown to brown-orange. The surface exhibits a coarsely warted texture, while the asci contain 1–8 ascospores with spinoreticulate ornamentation, which may serve as diagnostic features based on the current collections. The known distribution of this species is limited to China.

Material examined.

Location • Yunnan Province, Changning County (37.1212°N, 101.7307°E). Habitat: Hypogeous, found in soil beneath a pure Pinus armandii forest Altitude: Approximately 2500 m Collection Date: 20 Sep. 2020 Specimens: YAAS L3932, YAAS L3933 Collector: S. H. Li Repository: Herbarium of Institute of Forestry and Soil Sciences (YAAS).

Tuber calosporum S. P. Wan et al. Mycoscience, 2016, 57(6): 393–399

Note.

Tuber calosporum S. P. Wan et al. was originally described based on four specimens collected from Huize County in Yunnan Province, as detailed by Wan et al. in 2016. The specimens (wsp352, wsp145, wsp186, and wsp382) provided successful DNA data. This study introduces two additional collections, suggesting a broader distribution of the species in the southwest region of China. Morphologically, T. calosporum is recognized by its brownish-yellow ascocarps with a verrucose surface, featuring superficial yellow furrows. The ascospores are characterized by their large, ellipsoid shape and shallow alveolar ornamentation, which can serve as diagnostic traits based on the present collections. The species is known to occur exclusively in China.

Material examined.

Location • Yunnan Province, Xiangyun County (25°39'43"N, 100°52'27"E) Habitat: Found in soil beneath a mixed forest dominated by Pinus yunnanensis Collection Date: 20 Sep 2020 Specimens: YAAS L3648, YAAS L3684 Collector: S. H. Li Repository: Herbarium of Institute of Forestry and Soil Sciences (YAAS).

Discussion

The similarities of ITS sequences of T. marroninum and T. conditum to all described Tuber species are lower than 95.5% and 89.0%, respectively. In the genus Tuber, species delimitation based on 96% similarity in ITS has been suggested by previous studies (Kinoshita et al. 2011, 2021). Moreover, T. marroninum and T. conditum can be distinguished from other related species by morphology alone. In addition, phylogenetically, T. marroninum forms a distinct branch with high support (ITS 100% BS and 1.0 PP), and its sister species, T. caoi, can be distinguished by ITS-LUS-TEF1-RPB2 and ITS1 + 5.8S + ITS2 combined ML trees (Figs 1, 2). Tuber conditum can be distinguished from T. tomentosum, T. rapaeodorum, and T. songlu by the ML tree of ITS-LUS-TEF1-RPB2 (Fig. 1) and from T. tomentosum by the ITS1 + 5.8S + ITS2 combined ML tree (Fig. 2).

Morphologically, T. marroninum resembles T. caoi, T. jinshajiangense (Fan et al. 2016), and T. shii (Wang et al. 2016) of Chinese species with regard to its regularly globose ascospores with alveolar ornamentation. However, T. caoi and T. jinshajiangense have gray or pale gray and pubescent ascomata, but T. marroninum has whitish and glabrous ascomata. There are obvious differences between both T. marroninum and T. shii from their ascomata and gleba. Tuber shii often has some superficial furrows, is pale grey-brown or pale brown, and has distinctive silver-grey tints ascomata, its gleba with brown at maturity (Wang et al. 2016), but T. marroninum has whitish and brown glabrous ascomata, and its gleba is brown to dark brown at maturity. Additionally, T. marroninum differs from T. caoi (37.5–40 μm in one-spored asci), T. jinshajiangense (35–37.5 μm in one-spored asci), and T. shii (29–51.5 μm in one-spored asci) by its larger ascospore (41.5–52 μm in one-spored asci). Tuber conditum differs from other species by its grey-white to grey-brown ascomata, thinner peridium (120–200 µm), and larger ascospores (49–66.5 × 34.5–60 μm in one-spored asci). The close relationship species of T. tomentosum has abundant spiny cystidia on the peridium surface (Kinoshita et al. 2011), and T. pseudosphaerosporum has 2–4.5 cm diam and white or whitish-yellow ascomata (Fan and Yue 2013). Furthermore, T. marroninum and T. conditum can remarkably identify other Chinese species of the Latisporum group, such as T. alboumbilicum (Li et al. 2014), T. baoshanense (Wan et al. 2017), T. elevatireticulatum (Lin et al. 2018), T. griseolivaceum (Huang et al. 2017), T. huiliense, T. luyashanense, T. microcarpum (Fan et al. 2022), and T. panzhihuanense (Deng et al. 2013), based on the color and size of ascomata. Of course, the two pairs of truffles are quite different because the phylogenetic tree places them in a different position by ITS-LUS-TEF1-RPB2 and ITS1 + 5.8S + ITS2 combined ML trees (Figs 1, 2).

In conclusion, we demonstrated that T. marroninum is a new species characterized by the maroon color of the ascoma, and T. conditum is a new species characterized by its smooth ascocarp surfaces and larger ellipsoid ascospores. Our findings of these species, T. conditum, T. songlu, T. qujingense, T. rapaeodorum, and T. tomentosum, are divided within the same group by their morphologic characteristics and phylogenetic relationships. In addition, T. marroninum, T. pseudosphaerosporum, and T. caoi are divided within the same group by their morphologic characteristics and phylogenetic relationships (Figs 1, 2). However, they were revealed to possibly belong to the Latisporum group (Wan et al. 2016, 2017; Fan et al. 2022) by the phylogenetic relationships through adding more DNA sequences in this study.

Key to the species of the Latisporum group

1 One-layer peridium 2
Two-layer peridium 4
2 Peridium prosenchymatous 3
Peridium pseudoparenchymatous 5
3 Irregular and lobed T. panzhihuanense (Deng et al., 2013)
Surface smooth and with a few pinholes T. conditum
4 Peridium smooth and glabrous 6
Peridium puberulent 7
5 Ascomata white umbilicate T. alboumbilicum (Li et al. 2014)
Ascomata whitish, becoming brown when bruised with white furrow T. marroninum
6 Ascomata whitish-yellow and mostly much lobed with deep furrows T. pseudosphaerosporum (Fan & Yue, 2013)
Ascomata pale yellow to desert yellow with distinctively hygrophanous patch around or near the base T. parvomurphium (Fan et al., 2016)
7 Ascospores mainly globose 8
Ascospores mainly broadly ellipsoid 9
8 Ascospores globose only T. caoi (Fan et al., 2016)
Ascospores fusiform, globose or sometimes subglobose T. polymorphosporum (Wan et al., 2017)
9 Ascomata olive gray or gray with green T. griseolivaceum (Huang et al., 2017)
Ascomata pale yellowish brown or reddish brown 10
10 Ascospores broad ellipsoid 11
Ascospores ellipsoid, subglobose 12
11 Asci 2–3 spored, ascospores smaller (25–40 × 14–25 μm) Tuber tomentosum (Kinoshita et al., 2011)
Asci 1–4 spored, ascospores larger (30–60 × 25–50 μm) Tuber sp. 12 (Kinoshita et al., 2011)
12 Ascomata ocher-yellow 13
Ascomata whitish 14
13 Asci 2–3 spored, ascospores smaller (30–35 × 20–30 μm) Tuber sp. 11 (Kinoshita et al., 2011)
Asci 2–3 spored, ascospores largerer (30–55 × 30–40 μm) Tuber sp. 13 (Kinoshita et al., 2011)
14 Ascospores reddish-brown, with five-spored in asci and alveolar walls up to 2–6 μm tall T. baoshanense (Wan et al., 2017)
Ascospores yellowish brown to brown, with four-spored in asci and alveolate reticulum 3–5 μm tall T. thailandicum (Suwannarach et al., 2015)
Ascospores yellowish brown to reddish brown, with four-spored in asci and alveolar walls up to 3–5 μm deep T. latisporum (Chen & Liu, 2007)

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This study was financially supported by grants from the Central Guidance for Local Scientific and Technological Development Funds (Project ID: 202307AB110001); the National Natural Science Foundation of China to Shu-Hong Li (No. 31560009); and the Thesis Writing Grant of Mae Fah Luang University, Thailand, to Tianjun Yuan.

Author contributions

All authors have contributed equally.

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Alfaro ME, Zoller S, Lutzoni F (2003) Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20(2): 225–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msg028
  • Bonito GM, Gryganskyi AP, Trappe JM, Vilgalys R (2010) A global meta-analysis of Tuber ITS rDNA sequences: Species diversity, host associations and long-distance dispersal. Molecular Ecology 19: 4994–5008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04855.x
  • Bonito G, Smith ME, Nowak M, Healy RA, Guevara G, Cazares E, Kinoshita A, Nouhra ER, Dominguez LS, Tedersoo L, Murat C, Wang Y, Moreno BA, Pfister DH, Nara K, Zambonelli A, Trappe JM, Vilgalys R (2013) Historical biogeography and diversification of truffles in the Tuberaceae and their newly identified southern hemisphere sister lineage. PLoS One 8(1): E52765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052765
  • Cacialli G (2005) Le specie europee del genere Tuber. Una revisione storica by Artguro Ceruti, Anna Fontana & Caroline Nosenzo (2003). Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturale, Torino. Mycologist 19(3): 134–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269915X05243069
  • Fan L, Yue SF (2013) Phylogenetic divergence of three morphologically similar truffles: Tuber sphaerosporum, T. sinosphaerosporum, and T. pseudosphaerosporum sp. nov. Mycotaxon 125: 283–288. https://doi.org/10.5248/125.283
  • Fan L, Feng S, Cao JZ (2014) The phylogenetic position of Tuber glabrum sp. nov. and T. sinomonosporum nom. nov., two paradoxa–like truffle species form China. Mycological Progress 13: 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-013-0908-4
  • Fan L, Zhang PR, Yan XY (2016) Molecular analysis of Chinese truffles resembling Tuber californicum in morphology reveals a rich pattern of species diversity with emphasis on four new species. Mycologia 108(2): 344–353. https://doi.org/10.3852/14-343
  • Fan L, Li T, Xu YY, Yan XY (2022) Species diversity, phylogeny, endemism and geography of the truffle genus Tuber in China based on morphological and molecular data. Persoonia 48: 178–202. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2022.48.05
  • Geng LY, Wang XH, Yu FQ, Deng XJ, Tian XF, Shi XF, Xie XD, Liu PG, Shen YY (2009) Mycorrhizal synthesis of Tuber indicum with two indigenous hosts, Castanea mollissima and Pinus armandii. Mycorrhiza 19: 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-009-0247-0
  • Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42(2): 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/42.2.182
  • Hofstetter V, Clémencon H, Vilgalys R, Moncalvo JM (2002) Phylogenetic analyses of the Lyophylleae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) based on nuclear and mitochondrial rDNA sequences. Mycological Research 106(9): 1043–1059. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095375620200641X
  • Huang KB, Chen M, Fan L (2017) Tuber griseolivaceum sp. nov., a new olive–gray truffle species from China based on morphological and DNA data. Phytotaxa 309(2): 166–172. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.309.2.8
  • Jeandroz S, Murat C, Wang Y, Bonfante P, Tacon FL (2008) Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the genus Tuber, the ‘true truffles’. Journal of Biogeography 35(5): 815–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01851.x
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Kinoshita A, Sasaki H, Nara K (2011) Phylogeny and diversity of Japanese truffles (Tuber spp.) inferred from sequences of four nuclear loci. Mycologia 103(4): 779–794. https://doi.org/10.3852/10-138
  • Kinoshita A, Sasaki H, Orihara T, Nakajima M, Nara K (2021) Tuber iryudaense and T. tomentosum: Two new truffles encased in tomentose mycelium from Japan. Mycologia 113(3): 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2021.1875709
  • Kornerup A, Wanscher JH (1978) Methuen Handbook of Colour. 3rd edn. Eyre Methuen Ltd, London, 252 pp.
  • Lancellotti E, Lotti M, Zambonelli A, Franceschini A (2016) The Puberulum group sensu lato (whitish truffles). True Truffle (Tuber spp.) in the World: Soil Ecology, Systematics and Biochemistry, 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31436-5_7
  • Li SH, Zheng LY, Liu CY, Wang Y, Li L, Zhao YC, Zhang XL, Yang M, Xiong HK, Qing Y, Wang L, Zhou DQ (2014) Two new truffles species, Tuber alboumbilicum and Tuber pseudobrumale from China. Mycological Progress 13(4): 1157–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-014-1004-0
  • Lin CL, Tsai MJ, Fu CH, Chang TT, Li HT, Wong KF (2018) Tuber elevatireticulatum sp. nov., a new species of whitish truffle from Taiwan. Botanical Studies 59(1): 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-018-0241-y
  • Liu B (1985) New species and records of hypogeous from fungi China (I). Acta Mycologica Sinica 4: 84–89.
  • Manjón JL, García-Montero LG, Alvarado P, Moreno G, Massimo GD (2009) Tuber pseudoexcavatum versus T. pseudohimalayense – New data on the molecular taxonomy and mycorrhizae of Chinese truffles. Mycotaxon 110: 399. https://doi.org/10.5248/110.399
  • Matheny PB (2005) Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe, Agaricales). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 1e20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.014
  • Moreno G, Manjón L, Díez J, García-Montero LG, Di Massimo G (1997) Tuber pseudohimalayense sp. nov. commercialized in Spain, similar to the “Perigord” truffle. Mycotaxon 63: 217–224.
  • Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest v. 2.2. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala University, Department of systematic zoology, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Rehner SA, Buckley E (2005) A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: Evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 97(1): 84–98. https://doi.org/10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Sasaki H, Kinoshita A, Nara K (2016) An illustrated book of Japanese truffles. Seibundo-shinkosha, Tokyo. [in Japanese]
  • Schickmann S, Urban A, Krautler K, Nopp–Mayr U, Hacklander K (2012) The interrelationship of mycophagous small mammals and ectomycorrhizal fungi in primeval, disturbed and managed Central European mountainous forests. Oecologia 170: 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2303-2
  • Stamatakis A, Ludwig T, Meier H (2005) RAXML-III: A fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 21(4): 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti191
  • Sung GH, Hywel-Jones NL, Sung JM, Luangsa-Ard JJ, Shrestha B, Spatafora JW (2007) Phylogenetic classification of Cordyceps and the clavicipitaceous fungi. Studies in Mycology 57: 5–59. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2007.57.01
  • Suwannarach N, Kumla J, Lumyong S (2015) A new whitish truffle, Tuber thailandicum from northern Thailand and its ectomycorrhizal association. Mycological Progress 14: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-015-1107-2
  • Trappe JM, Molina R, Luoma DL, Cázares E, Pilz D, Smith JE, Catellano MA, Miller SL, Trappe MJ (2009) Diversity, Ecology, and Conservation of Truffle Fungi in Forests of the Pacific Northwest. General Technical Report PNW–GTR–772. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-772
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172(8): 4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
  • Wan SP, Yu FQ, Tang L, Wang R, Wang Y, Liu PG, Wang XH, Zeng Y (2015) Ectomycorrhizae of Tuber huidongense and T. liyuanum with Castanea mollissima and Pinus armandii. Mycorrhiza 26: 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-015-0663-2
  • Wang Y, Moreno G, Riousset LJ, Manjón JL, Riousset G, Fourré G, Di Massimo G, García-Montero LG, Díez J (1998) Tuber pseudoexcavatum sp. nov. A new species from China commercialized in Spain, France and Italy with additional comments on Chinese truffles. Mycologie 19(1–2): 113–120. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.354491
  • Yang ZL, Zhang LF (2003) Type studies on Clitocybe macrospora and Xerula furfuracea var. bispora. Mycotaxon 88: 447–454.
login to comment