Research Article
Print
Research Article
Four new araneogenous species and a new genus in Hypocreales (Clavicipitaceae, Cordycipitaceae) from the karst region of China
expand article infoWan-Hao Chen§|, Dan Li, Hui-Lin Shu, Jian-Dong Liang|, Jie-Hong Zhao, Wei-Yi Tian|, Yan-Feng Han§
‡ Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
§ Guizhou University, Guiyang, China
| Key Laboratory of Microbio and Infectious Disease Prevention & Control in Guizhou Province, Guiyang, China
Open Access

Abstract

The karst region in southwestern China is one of the biodiversity hotspots in the world with rich fungal diversity but under-studied. Four fungal species belonging to Chlorocillium (Clavicipitaceae) and Gamszarella (Cordycipitaceae) were isolated from dead spiders. Morphological comparisons, phylogenetic analyses and a PHI analysis based on multigene datasets support the establishment of these new species viz., Chlorocillium guizhouense sp. nov., C. vallense sp. nov., Gamszarella sinensis sp. nov., and G. vallensis sp. nov. are introduced. A new genus, Neogamszarella, is proposed to accommodate Gamszarella antillana, which is phylogenetically distinct from Gamszarella s. str. Our results revealed that further attention needs to be paid to the diversity of araneogenous fungi in the karst regions of southwestern China.

Key words

Chlorocillium, lecanicillium-like, morphology, phylogenetic analysis, spider

Introduction

Araneogenous or araneopathogenic fungi are spider-pathogenic fungi and are one of the ecologically important groups of fungi (Evans and Samson 1987). Formerly, araneogenous fungi were restricted to three families in Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae (Kobayasi and Shimizu 1982; Chen et al. 2018; Mongkolsamrit et al. 2018) and Ophiocordycipitaceae (Kobayasi 1941; Samson and Evans 1975), and one species in Bionectriaceae (Chen et al. 2016a; Shrestha et al. 2019). However, Chen et al. (2022a) reported two new spider-associated genera in Clavicipitaceae. Wang et al. (2024a) reported Akanthomyces Lebert, Beauveria Vuill., Cordyceps Fr., Engyodontium de Hoog, Gibellula Cavara, Hevansia Luangsa-ard et al., Lecanicillium W. Gams & Zare, Samsoniella Mongkols. et al., Torrubiella Boud., Jenniferia Mongkols. et al., Polystromomyces Mongkols. et al., Bhushaniella Mongkolsamrit et al., Hirsutella Pat., Hymenostilbe Petch, Ophiocordyceps Petch, Purpureocillium Luangsa-ard et al., Clonostachys Corda and Chlorocillium Zare & W. Gams, from spiders. Crous et al. (2023) introduced a new araneogenous genus, Gamszarella Crous, while Khonsanit et al. (2024) introduced two new spider-host genera, Arachnidicola Khons. et al., and Corniculantispora Khons., et al. and restricted the hosts of Akanthomyces to moths. Thus, the araneogenous fungi were distributed in 21 genera of Hypocreales (List of the genera see Suppl. material 1) (Crous et al. 2023; Khonsanit et al. 2024; Wang et al. 2024a).

The karst region in southwestern China is one of the 36 biodiversity hotspots in the world (Delgado-Baquerizo et al. 2020). A large range of continuously distributed primary forests exist in the karst region, with an exceptionally diverse ecosystem. As a result of the complex ecological environment and unique geographic conditions in this region, unique species can be described (Özkan et al. 2010; Su et al. 2017). Seventeen new araneogenous species and new records were reported by Chen et al. (2012, 2016a, b, 2017a, b, 2018, 2019a, 2022a, b, c, 2023, 2024), Han et al. (2013) and Zou et al. (2016, 2021) from karst region of southwest China.

During a survey of araneogenous fungi and their allies in southwestern China, infected spider specimens were collected, and fungal strains were isolated and purified. Isolated strains were identified based on the multigene phylogeny and morphological characteristics, and introduced four new species in Clavicipitaceae and Cordycipitaceae i.e. Chlorocillium guizhouense sp. nov., C. vallense sp. nov., Gamszarella sinensis sp. nov., and G. vallensis sp. nov. Moreover, Gamszarella antillana is not congeneric with Gamszarella s. str. in the phylogenetic analyses, thus, Neogamszarella is proposed to accommodate it.

Materials and methods

Specimen collection and identification

The specimens were collected from Dali Dong Village (26°01'58.70"N, 108°24'48.06"E), Rongjiang County, Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture, Mayao River Valley (26°21'24.71"N, 107°22'48.22"E), Duyun City, Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture and Bala Valley (26°45'7.0344"N, 106°58'57.09"E), Wudang District, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, on 1st October 2018, 4th September 2021 and 5th April 2024, respectively. The samples were placed in an ice box and brought to the laboratory. Specimens were preserved in the refrigerator at 4 °C until further processing. The surface of each arthropod body was rinsed with sterile water, followed by sterilization with 75% ethanol for 3–5 s and rinsing again three times with sterilized water. After drying on sterilized filter paper, a piece of the synnema, mycelium or sclerotium was cut from the specimen and placed on plates of potato dextrose agar (PDA) or PDA modified by the addition of 1% w/v peptone containing 0.1 g/l streptomycin and 0.05 g/l tetracycline (Chen et al. 2019b). After fungal colonies emerged from the plated samples, a piece of mycelium from the colony edge was transferred onto new agar plates and cultured at 25 °C for 14 days under 12 h light/12 h dark conditions (Zou et al. 2010). The holotypes and ex-types cultures were deposited at the Institute of Fungus Resources, Guizhou University (formally Herbarium of Guizhou Agricultural College; code, GZAC), Guiyang City, Guizhou, China. MycoBank numbers were obtained as outlined in MycoBank (http://www.MycoBank.org) (Crous et al. 2004).

Colony characteristics were determined on PDA cultures incubated at 25 °C for 14 days and growth rate, presence of octahedral crystals and colony colors (surface and reverse) were observed. To investigate microscopic characteristics, a little of the mycelia was picked up from the colony and mounted in lactophenol cotton blue or 20% lactic acid solution and the asexual morphological characteristics (e.g., conidiophores, phialides or conidiogenous cells, and conidia) were observed and measured using a Leica DM4 B microscope.

DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction amplification and nucleotide sequencing

DNA extraction was carried out using a fungal genomic DNA extraction kit (DP2033, BioTeke Corporation) according to Liang et al. (2011). The extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify genetic markers using the following primer pairs: ITS4/ITS5 for the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region (White et al. 1990), LR0R/LR5 for 28s large subunit ribosomal (LSU) (Vilgalys and Hester 1990), fRPB2-5F/fRPB2-7cR for RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2) (Liu et al. 1999) and 983F/2218R for translation elongation factor 1 alpha (tef-1α) (Castlebury et al. 2004). The thermal cycle of PCR amplification for these phylogenetic markers was set up following the procedure described by Chen et al. (2021). PCR products were purified and sequenced at Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co. All newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank and accession numbers were obtained (Table 1).

Table 1.

List of strains and GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in this study.

Species Strain GenBank Accession No.
ITS LSU RPB2 tef-1α
Aciculosporium oplismeni MAFF 246966 LC571760 LC571760 - LC572040
A. take MAFF 241224 LC571753 LC571753 - LC572034
A. take TNS-F-60465 LC571755 LC571756 - LC572035
Akanthomyces aculeatus HUA 186145 T - MF416520 - MF416465
A. aculeatus TS 772 - KC519370 - KC519366
Aschersonia confluens BCC 7961 JN049841 DQ384947 - DQ384976
A. placenta BCC 7869 JN049842 EF469074 - EF469056
Ascopolyporus albus BCC 48975 T OL331502 OL322048 OL322065 OL322035
A. albus BCC 48976 OL331503 OL322049 OL322066 OL322036
Arachnidicola sulphurea TBRC 7248 T NR_164419 MF140722 MF140812 MF140843
A. sulphurea TBRC 7249 MF140757 MF140721 MF140734 MF140842
Atkinsonella hypoxylon B4728 - - - KP689546
Balansia epichloe A.E.G. 96-15a - - - EF468743
B. henningsiana A.E.G. 96-27a JN049815 AY545727 - AY489610
B. pilulaeformis A.E.G. 94-2 - AF543788 - DQ522319
Beauveria bassiana ARSEF 1564T HQ880761 - HQ880905 HQ880974
B. bassiana ARSEF 1478 AY531981 - HQ880908 AY531890
Blackwellomyces cardinalis OSC 93610 JN049843 AY184963 EF469106 EF469059
B. cardinalis OSC93609T NR_159788 AY184962 DQ522422 DQ522325
Bhushaniella rubra BCC 47541T OQ892128 OQ892133 OQ914433 OQ914428
B. rubra BCC 47542 OQ892129 OQ892134 OQ914434 OQ914429
Chlorocillium araneogenum DY101801T MW730536 MW730623 - MW753039
C. araneogenum DY101802 MW730545 MW730625 - MW753040
C. griseum CBS 387.73T KU382150 KU382218 - -
C. griseum RCEF6632 MW031768 MW084342 - MW091327
C. gueriniae BRIP 72680aT OR750699 OR731505 - OR737799
C. gueriniae BRIP 72666a OR750701 OR731507 - OR737801
C. gueriniae BRIP 72668a OR750702 OR731508 - OR737802
C. lepidopterorum SD05361T MW730543 MW730624 - MW753041
C. lepidopterorum SD05362 MW730611 MW730629 - MW753042
C. montefioreae BRIP 70299aT PP420202 PP415875 - PP438400
C. guizhouense DL10171T MN128448 - - MN101596
C. guizhouense DL10172 PQ432742 - - PQ444210
C. sinense KY07181T PP768154 PP768156 - PP766580
C. sinense KY07182 PP768155 PP768157 - PP766581
C. vallense DY09021T PQ432743 PQ432746 - PQ444211
C. vallense DY09022 PQ432744 PQ432747 - PQ444212
Claviceps fusiformis ATCC 26019 JN049817 U17402 - DQ522320
C. purpurea GAM 12885 U57669 AF543789 - AF543778
C. purpurea S.A. cp11 - EF469075 - EF469058
Clonostachys rosea GJS90-227 - AY489716 - AY489611
Collarina aurantiaca FMR 11134 KJ807178 KJ807181 - -
C. aurantiaca FMR 11784 KJ807177 KJ807180 - -
Conoideocrella luteorostrata NHJ 11343 JN049859 EF468850 - EF468801
C. luteorostrata NHJ 12516 JN049860 EF468849 - EF468800
C. tenuis NHJ 6293 JN049862 EU369044 - EU369029
Corallocytostroma ornithocopreoides WAC 8705 - - - LT216546
Cordyceps militaris OSC 93623 T JN049825 AY184966 - DQ522332
C. militaris YFCC 6587 - MN576818 MN576932 MN576988
C. inthanonensis BCC 55812 T MT000706 MT003041 MT017832 -
C. inthanonensis BCC 56302 MT000705 MT003040 MT017831 MT017853
Corniculantispora psalliotae CBS 532.81 T MH861374 AF339560 EF469112 EF469067
C. psalliotae CBS 101270 - EF469081 EF469113 EF469066
Corpulentispora magnispora CGMCC 3.19304 T MK329102 MK329007 MK335985 MK336037
C. magnispora LC12469 MK329103 MK329008 MK335986 MK336038
Dussiella tuberiformis* - - - JQ257027
Engyodontium aranearum CBS 309.85 JN036556 AF339526 DQ522439 DQ522341
Ephelis japonica CBS 236.64 MH858427 - - -
E. japonica Eph.oryzae AB038564 - - -
E. tripsaci CBS 857.72T NR_153997 NG_059240 - -
E. elymi C. Schardl 760 - AY986924 - AY986951
Epichloe typhina ATCC 56429 JN049832 U17396 - AF543777
Flavocillium acerosum CBS 418.81T NR_111268 KM283786 KM283852 KM283810
F. bifurcatum YFCC 6101T MN576833 MN576781 MN576897 MN576951
Gamszarea humicola CGMCC 3.19303T NR_172830 NG_075268 MK335979 MK336027
G. wallacei CBS 101237T NR_111267 NG_042398 EF469119 EF469073
Gamszarella buffelskloofina CBS 150062T OR680769 OR717025 OR683726
G. sinensis WD04081T PQ527895 PQ527899 PQ553218 PQ553220
G. sinensis WD04082 PQ527896 PQ527900 PQ553219 PQ553221
G. vallensis WD04101T PQ527897 PQ527901 - -
G. vallensis WD04102 PQ527898 PQ527902 - -
Gibellula nigeli NHJ 10808T - EU369035 EU369076 EU369018
G. nigeli BCC47555 MH532885 - - MH521897
Helicocollum surathaniensis BCC 34463 - KT222328 - KT222336
H. surathaniensis BCC 34464T - KT222329 - KT222337
Heteroepichloe bambusae Ba-01 AB065426 - - -
H. bambusae Bo-01 AB065428 - - -
H. sasae E. sasae-H AB065432 - - -
H. sasae E. sasae-N AB065431 - - -
Hevansia novoguineensis CBS 610.80T NR_169678 NG_070837 MH521844 MH521885
H. novoguineensis BCC 47881 JX192685 MH394650 MH521845 MH521886
Hyperdermium bertonii AF242354 - AF242354 - -
Jenniferia cinerea BCC 06839 GQ249999 GQ249970 EU369070 EU369009
J. cinerea BCC 2191 GQ250000 GQ249971 - GQ250029
Kanoksria zaquensis HMAS 246915T MT789699 MT789697 - MT797812
K. zaquensis HMAS 246917 MT789698 MT789696 - MT797811
Keithomyces carneus CBS 239.32 NR_131993 NG_057769 - EF468789
Lecanicillium lecanii CBS 101247 JN049836 AF339555 DQ522466 DQ522359
L. lecanii CBS 102067T MH862778 KM283795 KM283860 KM283818
Leptobacillium chinense CGMCC 3.14970T NR_155782 NG_069101 - -
L. coffeanum COAD 2057T MF066035 MF066033 - -
L. coffeanum COAD 2061 MF066034 MF066032 - -
L. filiforme URM 7918T NR_171744 NG_075252 - -
L. leptobactrum CBS 774.69T NR_154111 NG_069745 - -
Liangia sinensis YFCC 3103T MN576831 MN576782 MN576898 MN576952
L. sinensis YFCC 3104 MN576832 MN576783 MN576899 MN576953
Marquandomyces marquandii CBS 182.27 NR_131994 EF468845 - EF468793
Metapochonia bulbillosa CBS 145.70 MH859529 AF339542 - EF468796
M. gonioides CBS 891.72 AJ292409 AF339550 - DQ522354
M. rubescens CBS 464.88T - AF339566 - EF468797
M. sulchlasporia CBS 251.83 NR_154139 MH873311 - KJ398790
Metarhiziopsis microspora CEHS133a EF464589 EF464571 - -
M. microspora INEHS133a EF464583 EF464572 - -
Metarhizium anisopliae ARSEF 7487 HQ331446 - - DQ463996
M. anisopliae CBS 130.71T MT078884 MT078853 - MT078845
M. flavoviride CBS 125.65 MT078885 MT078854 - MT078846
M. flavoviride CBS 700.74 - MT078855 - MT078847
M. flavoviride CBS 218.56T MH857590 MH869139 - KJ398787
Microhilum oncoperae ARSEF 4358 - AF339532 EF468936 EF468785
Moelleriella phyllogena CUP 067785 - EU392610 - EU392674
M. phyllogena CUP 067793 - EU392608 - EU392672
M. umbospora CUP 067817T - EU392628 - EU392688
Morakotia fusca BCC 64125 - KY794862 - KY794857
M. fusca BCC 79272T - KY794861 - KY794856
Mycophilomyces periconiae CPC 27558 NR_154209 NG_059746 - -
Myriogenospora atramentosa A.E.G 96-32 - AY489733 - AY489628
Neoaraneomyces araneicola DY101711T MW730520 MW730609 - MW753033
N. araneicola DY101712 MW730522 MW730610 - MW753034
Neobaryopsis andensis A.F.25967-2T NR_169713 NG_068701 - -
N. andensis A.F.25967-1 MT153956 MT153985 - -
Neobarya parasitica Marson s/n KP899626 KP899626 - -
Neogamszarella antillata CBS 350.85T NR_111097 AF339536 DQ522450 DQ522350
Neohyperdermium piperis CBS 116719T - AY466442 EU369083 DQ118749
N. pulvinatum P.C. 602 - DQ118738 AF242353 DQ118746
Neotorrubiella chinghridicola BCC 80733T NR_175629 MK632097 MK632149 -
N. chinghridicola BCC 39684 MK632038 MK632096 - MK632072
Niesslia exilis CBS 560.74 - AY489720 - AY489614
Nigelia aurantiaca BCC13019 - GU979948 - GU979957
N. martiale EFCC 6863 - JF415974 - JF416016
Niveomyces coronatus NY04434800T - ON493606 ON513400 ON513397
N. coronatus Niveo - ON493605 - -
Orbiocrella petchii NHJ 6209 JN049861 EU369039 - EU369023
O. petchii NHJ 6240 - EU369038 - EU369022
Papiliomyces liangshanensis EFCC 1452 - EF468815 - EF468756
P. liangshanensis EFCC 1523 - EF468814 - EF468755
P. shibinensis GZUH SB13050311T NR154178 - - KR153589
Parahevansia koratensis BCC01485 GQ250010 GQ249981 - GQ250031
P. websteri NHJ 2662 GQ250008 GQ249982 - GQ250032
Parametarhizium changbaiense CGMCC 19143T MN589741 MN589994 - MN908589
P. hingganense CGMCC 19144 MN055703 MN061635 - MN065770
Paraneoaraneomyces sinensis ZY 22.006 OQ709254 OQ709260 - OQ719626
P. sinensis ZY 22.007 OQ709255 OQ709261 - OQ719627
Parengyodontium album CBS 836.71 LC092882 MH872118 - LC382178
P. album CBS 368.72 MH860502 MH872217 - LC382183
Parepichloe cinerea Ne-01 AB065425 - - -
Periglandula ipomoeae IasaF13 - - - KP689568
Pleurodesmospora coccorum CBS 460.73 MH860743 MH872455 - -
P. lepidopterorum DY 10501T MW826576 - MW834316 MW834317
P. lepidopterorum DY 10502 MW826577 - MW834318 MW834319
Pochonia boninensis JCM 18597 AB709858 AB709831 - AB758463
P. chlamydosporia CBS 101244 JN049821 DQ518758 - DQ522327
Polystromomyces araneae BCC 93301T MZ684101 MZ684016 MZ707845 MZ707825
Pseudogibellula formicarum BCC 84257 MT508782 MT512653 - MT533480
P. formicarum CBS 433.73 MH860731 MH872442 - MT533481
Pseudoniveomyces arachnovorum BCC 95818T OR098526 - - OR133173
P. blattae BCC 53567T ON103042 ON103167 ON125036 -
P. blattae BCC 53568 ON103043 ON103168 ON125037 ON125025
Pseudolecanicillium caatingaense URM8446T ON862933 ON862925 OP290514 OP290526
P. caatingaense URM8442 ON862934 ON862926 OP290513 OP290525
Purpureomyces maesotensis BCC 88441 MN781916 MN781877 - MN781734
P. maesotensis BCC 85349 MN781928 MN781872 - MN781729
P. maesotensis BCC 89300T MN781917 MN781876 - MN781733
Regiocrella camerunensis ARSEF 7682 - DQ118735 - DQ118743
Rotiferophthora angustispora CBS 101437 AJ292412 AF339535 - AF543776
Samsoniella alboaurantium CBS 262.58T AY624179 AB080087 MF416448 MF416497
S. alboaurantium CBS 240.32 AY624178 JF415979 JF415999 JF416019
S. inthanonensis TBRC 7915T NR_164420 NG_069500 MF140815 MF140849
S. inthanonensis TBRC 7916 MF140760 MF140724 MF140814 MF140848
Samuelsia chalalensis CUP 067856T - EU392637 - EU392691
S. mundiveteris BCC 40021 - GU552152 - GU552145
S. rufobrunnea CUP 067858 - AY986918 - AY986944
Shimizuomyces paradoxus EFCC 6279 JN049847 EF469084 - EF469071
S. paradoxus EFCC 6564 - EF469083 - EF469072
Simplicillium lanosoniveum CBS 123.42T NR_171734 NG_068571 - -
Sungia yongmunensis EFCC 2131 JN049856 EF468833 - EF468770
S. yongmunensis EFCC 2135 - EF468834 - EF468769
Tyrannicordyceps fratricida TNS-F 19011 JQ349068 JQ257023 - JQ257028
Ustilaginoidea dichromonae MRL IB9228 - - - JQ257025
U. virens ATCC 16180 - - - JQ257026
U. virens MAFF 240421 - JQ257011 - JQ257024
Yosiokobayasia kusanagiensis TNS-F18494 - JF415972 - JF416014
Zarea fungicola CBS 992.69T NR_119653 KM283792 KM283857 KM283816
Zouia cauligalbarum GZUIFRZHJ01T MH730663 MH730667 MH801924 MH801920
Z. cauligalbarum GZUIFRZHJ02 MH730664 MH730668 MH801925 MH801921
Pleurocordyceps aurantiaca MFLUCC 17-2113 MG136916 MG136910 - MG136875
P. marginaliradians MFLU 17-1582T MG136920 MG136914 - MG136878
Purpureocillium lilacinum CBS 431.87 AY624188 EF468844 EF468940 EF468791

Sequence alignments and phylogenetic analyses

DNASTAR™ Lasergene (v 6.0) was used to edit DNA sequences in this study. Analyses 1: ITS, LSU and tef-1α sequences for the strains in Clavicipitaceae were downloaded from GenBank based on Xiao et al. (2023), Chen et al. (2024) and other sequences were selected based on BLASTn searches. Analyses 2: ITS, LSU, RPB2 and tef-1α sequences for the strains in Cordycipitaceae were downloaded from GenBank based on Khonsanit et al. (2024) and other sequences were selected based on BLASTn searches. All the sequences were aligned and edited by MAFFT v.7.037b (Katoh and Standley 2013) and MEGA6 (Tamura et al. 2013). Combined sequences for analysis 1 (dataset 1: ITS, LSU, tef-1α) and analysis 2 (dataset 2: ITS, LSU, RPB2, tef-1α) were obtained using SequenceMatrix v.1.7.8 (Vaidya et al. 2011). The model was selected for Bayesian analysis by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) in PhyloSuite (v1.2.2) software (Zhang et al. 2020).

The datasets 1 and 2 for analysis 1 and 2 were analyzed using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods, respectively. For BI, a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm was used to generate phylogenetic trees with Bayesian probabilities for the combined sequence datasets using MrBayes v.3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012). The Bayesian analysis resulted in 20,001 trees after 10,000,000 generations. The first 4,000 trees, representing the burn-in phase of the analysis, were discarded, while the remaining 16,001 trees were used to calculate posterior probabilities in the majority rule consensus tree. After the analysis was finished, each run was examined if it was greater than 200 using the program Tracer v.1.5 (Drummond and Rambaut 2007) to determine burn-in and confirm that both runs had converged. ML analyses were constructed with IQ-TREE (v 2.0) (Trifinopoulos et al. 2016), using an automatic selection of the model according to BIC.

Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) analysis

The Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition model was applied to analysis the related species. The pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) (Bruen et al. 2006) is a model test based on the fact that multiple gene phylogenies will be concordant between species and discordant due to recombination and mutations within a species. The test was performed in SplitsTree4 (Huson and Bryant 2006) as described by Quaedvlieg et al. (2014) to determine the recombination level within phylogenetically closely-related species using a three-locus or four-locus concatenated dataset. The new species and their closely-related species were analyzed using this model. The relationships between closely-related species were visualized by constructing a split graph, using both the LogDet transformation and splits decomposition options.

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

Analysis 1: Phylogenetic trees were generated in analysis 1 to determine the establishment of the new Chlorocillium species in Clavicipitaceae (Fig. 1). Pleurocordyceps aurantiaca (Y.P. Xiao et al.) Y.H. Wang et al. (MFLUCC 17-2113) and P. marginaliradians (Y.P. Xiao et al.) Y.H. Wang et al. (MFLU 17-1582) were used as the outgroup taxa in the analysis. The dataset included 74 taxa, and consisted of 2,280 (ITS, 660; LSU, 740, and tef-1α, 880) characters with gaps.

Figure 1. 

Phylogram retrieved from IQTREE of the new species and related species in Clavicipitaceae using the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, and tef-1α gene regions. The statistical values are provided at nodes as ML/PP (ML value above 50% and BI value above 0.50). The tree is rooted with Pleurocordyceps aurantiaca (MFLUCC 17-2113) and P. marginaliradians (MFLU 17-1582). Ex-types, new strains and new species are indicated by the superscript “T” and in bold, respectively.

The selected model for ML analysis was TIM+F+I+G4. The final value of the highest scoring tree was –26,825.060, which was obtained from the ML analysis of the dataset. The parameters of the GTR model used to analyze the dataset were estimated based on the following frequencies: A = 0.224, C = 0.291, G = 0.279, T = 0.207; substitution rates AC = 1.00000, AG = 2.11049, AT = 1.16800, CG = 1.16800, CT = 5.30232 and GT = 1.00000, as well as the gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.474. The selected model of the dataset for BI analysis was GTR+F+I+G4. The phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) constructed using ML and BI analyses was largely congruent and strongly supported in most branches. Most genera clustered into independent clades. Strains DL10171, DL10172, DY09021 and DY09022 clustered into two independent clades. Strains DL10171 and DL10172 have a close relationship with Chlorocillium griseum, whereas strains DY09021 and DY09022 have a close relationship with C. sinense W.H. Chen et al. and C. araneogenum (W.H. Chen et al.) W.H. Chen, et al.

Analysis 2: The phylogenetic trees were generated in analysis 2 to determine the establishment of the new species in Cordycipitaceae (Fig. 2). Purpureocillium lilacinum (Thom) Luangsa-ard et al. (CBS 431.87) was used as the outgroup taxon in the analysis. The dataset included 49 taxa and consisted of 2,280 (ITS, 631; LSU, 782, RPB2, 833 and tef-1α, 893) characters with gaps.

Figure 2. 

Phylogram retrieved from IQTREE of the new species and other related species in Cordycipitaceae using the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, RPB2 and tef-1α gene regions. The statistical values are provided at nodes as ML/PP (ML value above 50% and BI value above 0.50). The tree is rooted with Purpureocillium lilacinum (CBS 431.87). Ex-types, new strains and new species are indicated by the superscript “T” and in bold, respectively.

The selected model for ML analysis was TIM3+F+I+G4. The final value of the highest scoring tree was –36,309.393, which was obtained from the ML analysis of the dataset. The parameters of the GTR model used to analyze the dataset were estimated based on the following frequencies: A = 0.237, C = 0.280, G = 0.272, T = 0.211; substitution rates AC = 1.16611, AG = 2.87992, AT = 1.00000, CG = 1.16611, CT = 6.74648 and GT = 1.00000, as well as the gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.445. The selected model for BI analysis was GTR+F+I+G4 (ITS), GTR+F+I+G4 (LSU and tef-1α) and SYM+G4 (RPB2). The phylogenetic trees (Fig. 2) constructed using ML and BI analyses were largely congruent and strongly supported in most branches. Most genera clustered into independent clades. Strains WD04081, WD04082, WD04101 and WD04102 clustered into two independent clades with high statistical support (100% ML/1 PP) and were clustered with Gamszarella antillana (R.F. Castañeda & G.R.W. Arnold) Crous and G. buffelskloofina Crous in a clade with high statistical support in ML and BI analysis (100% ML/1 PP).

Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) analysis

A three-locus concatenated dataset (ITS, LSU and tef-1α) was used to determine the recombination level within Chlorocillium araneogenum (DY101801), C. griseum (CBS 387.73), C. gueriniae (BRIP 72680a), C. montefioreae (BRIP70299a), C. lepidopterorum (SD05361), C. guizhouense (DL10171), and strains KY07181 and DY09021 (Fig. 3), whereas a four-locus concatenated dataset (ITS, LSU, RPB2 and tef-1α) was used to determine the recombination level within Gamszarella antillana (CBS 350.85), G. buffelskloofina (CBS 150062), and strains WD04081 and WD04101 (Fig. 4). Chaiwan et al. (2022) noted that if the PHI is below the 0.05 threshold (Φw < 0.05), it indicates that there is significant recombination in the dataset. This means that related species in a group and recombination levels are not different. If the PHI is above the 0.05 threshold (Φw > 0.05), it indicates that it is not significant, which means that the related species in a group level are different. The result of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of Chlorocillium araneogenum, C. griseum, C. gueriniae, C. montefioreae, C. lepidopterorum, C. guizhouense, strains KY07181 and DY09021 was 1.0 and revealed that those species and strains KY07181 and DY09021 were different (Fig. 3). The result of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of Gamszarella antillana, G. buffelskloofina, and strains WD04081 and WD04101 was 1.0 and revealed that those species and strains WD04081 and WD04101 were different (Fig. 4).

Figure 3. 

Results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the new Chlorocillium strains and its closely-related species using both LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. PHI test results (Φw) < 0.05 indicate significant recombination within the dataset. The new strains are in bold type.

Figure 4. 

Results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the new Gamszarella strains and its closely-related species using both LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. PHI test results (Φw) < 0.05 indicate significant recombination within the dataset. The new strains are in bold type.

Taxonomy

Chlorocillium Zare & W. Gams, Mycol. Progr. 15: 1005, 2016

Chlorocillium guizhouense W.H. Chen, Y.F. Han & J.D. Liang, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 856175
Fig. 5

Etymology

Referring to the location, Guizhou Province, where the type specimen was collected.

Type

China • Guizhou Province, Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture, Rongjiang County, Dali Dong Village (26°01'58.70"N, 108°24'48.06"E). On a dead spider (Araneae), 1 October 2018, Wanhao Chen, GZAC DL1017 (holotype), ex-type, DL10171.

Description

Colonies on PDA reaching 21–24 mm diam. in 14 d at 25 °C, white, consisting of a basal felt and cottony, floccose overgrowth, reverse yellowish. Prostrate hyphae smooth, septate, hyaline, 1.1–1.6 μm diam. Conidial structures consisting of erect conidiophores usually arising from the aerial hyphae, solitary or lecanicillium-like with phialides in whorls of two to three. Phialides 11.6–25.3 × 1.0–1.2 μm, with a cylindrical basal portion, tapering into a distinct neck. Conidia in chains, hyaline, fusiform, 1-celled, 2.6–3.8 × 1.1–1.6 μm (average values 3.2 × 1.3 μm). Octahedral crystals not observed.

Figure 5. 

Chlorocillium guizhouense A infected spider B, C PDA culture plate showing top (B) and reverse (C) sides of the colony D–F phialides and conidia were stained with cotton blue GJ phialides and conidia. Scale bars: 10 mm (B, C); 10 μm (D–J).

Host

Spider (Araneae).

Additional material examined

China • Guizhou, Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture, Rongjiang County, Dali Dong Village (26°01'58.70"N, 108°24'48.06"E). On a dead spider (Araneae), 1 October 2018, Wanhao Chen, DL10172 (living culture).

Remarks

Chlorocillium guizhouense was identified as Chlorocillium, based on the BLASTn result in NCBI and the phylogenetic analysis of the combined dataset 1 (Fig. 1). It clustered into an independent clade with a close relationship with C. araneogenum, C. sinense and C. vallense with high bootstrap value (93% ML). Compared with the typical characteristics of the known species (Table 2), C. guizhouense was distinguished from C. araneogenum by its smaller conidia (2.6–3.8 × 1.1–1.6 μm vs. 3.4–5.8 × 1.4–1.8 μm). Chlorocillium guizhouense can be distinguished from C. sinense by its larger conidia (fusiform, 2.6–3.8 × 1.1–1.6 μm vs. fusiform to ellipsoidal, 1.9–2.9 × 0.8–1.2 μm). Chlorocillium guizhouense was distinguished from C. vallense by its larger phialides (11.6–25.3 × 1.0–1.2 μm vs. 9.2–17.1 × 0.8–1.2 μm). Thus, the morphological characteristics and molecular phylogenetic results support C. guizhouense as a new species.

Table 2.

Morphological comparison of the new species with other Chlorocillium species.

Species Phialides (μm) Conidia (μm) Hosts Octahedral crystals References
C. araneogenum 8.3–23.3 × 1.3–2.2 fusiform, 3.4–5.8 × 1.4–1.8 spider Absent Chen et al. 2022a
C. griseum 18–40(−55) × 2–2.5 fusiform, 4.5–6 × 1.0–1.5 spider Present Zare and Gams 2016
C. lepidopterorum 21.2–33.7 × 1.1–1.4 fusiform, 3.1–4.3 × 1.3–1.5 pupa Absent Chen et al. 2022a
C. sinense 11.7–20.1 × 1.1–1.3 fusiform to ellipsoidal, 1.9–2.9 × 0.8–1.2 spider Absent Chen et al. 2024
C. guizhouense 11.6–25.3 × 1.0–1.2 fusiform, 2.6–3.8 × 1.1–1.6 spider Absent This study
C. vallense 9.2–17.1 × 0.8–1.2 fusiform, 2.0–3.2 × 0.9–1.4 spider Absent This study

Chlorocillium vallense W.H. Chen, Y.F. Han & J.D. Liang, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 856176
Fig. 6

Etymology

Referring to its location, Mayao River Valley, where the fungus was first discovered.

Type

China • Guizhou Province, Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Duyun City, Mayao River Valley (26°21'24.71"N, 107°22'48.22"E). On a dead spider (Araneae), 4 September 2021, Wanhao Chen, GZAC DY0902 (holotype), ex-type, DY09021.

Description

Colonies on PDA reaching 72–74 mm diam. in 14 days at 25 °C, white, consisting of a basal felt and cottony, floccose overgrowth, reverse yellowish. Prostrate hyphae smooth, septate, hyaline, 0.9–1.3 μm diam. Conidial structures consisting of erect branching conidiophores usually arising from the aerial hyphae, solitary or lecanicillium-like in whorls of two to four. Phialides 9.2–17.1 × 0.8–1.2 μm, with a cylindrical basal portion, tapering into a distinct neck. Conidia hyaline, fusiform, 1-celled, 2.0–3.2 × 0.9–1.4 μm (average values 2.4 × 1.2 μm). Octahedral crystals not observed.

Figure 6. 

Chlorocillium vallense A infected spider B, C PDA culture plate showing top (B) and reverse (C) sides of the colony D–J phialides and conidia. Scale bars: 10 mm (B, C); 10 μm (D–J).

Host

Spider (Araneae).

Additional strain examined

China • Guizhou Province, Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Duyun City, Mayao River Valley (26°21'24.71"N, 107°22'48.22"E). On a dead spider (Araneae), 4 September 2021, Wanhao Chen, DY09022 (living culture).

Remarks

Chlorocillium vallense was identified as in Chlorocillium s. str., based on the BLASTn result in NCBI and the phylogenetic analysis of the combined dataset 1 (Fig. 1) and clustered into an independent clade with a close relationship with C. sinense and C. araneogenum. Compared with the typical characteristics of the known species (Table 2), C. vallense was distinguished from C. sinense by its shorter phialide (9.2–17.1 × 0.8–1.2 μm vs. 11.7–20.1 × 1.1–1.3 μm), larger fusiform conidia (2.0–3.2 × 0.9–1.4 μm vs. 1.9–2.9 × 0.8–1.2 μm) and fast-growing in PDA. Chlorocillium vallense was distinguished from C. araneogenum by its shorter phialide (9.2–17.1 × 0.8–1.2 μm vs. 8.3–23.3 × 1.3–2.2 μm) and smaller conidia (2.0–3.2 × 0.9–1.4 μm vs. 3.4–5.8 × 1.4–1.8 μm). Thus, based on both morphological characteristics and molecular phylogenetic results, we confirm C. vallense as a new species.

Gamszarella Crous, Persoonia 51: 391, 2023

Gamszarella sinensis W.H. Chen, Y.F. Han & J.D. Liang, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 856388
Fig. 7

Etymology

Referring to the country, China, where the fungus was first discovered.

Type

China • Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, Wudang District, Bala Valley (26°45'7.0344"N, 106°58'57.09"E). On a dead spider (Araneae), 5 April 2024, Wanhao Chen, GZAC WD0408 (holotype), ex-type, WD04081.

Description

Colonies on PDA reaching 37–38 mm diam in 14 d at 25 °C, white, consisting of a basal felt and cottony, floccose overgrowth, reverse yellowish, with radial patterns. Prostrate hyphae smooth, septate, hyaline, 1.5–1.9 μm diam. Conidial structures consisting of erect conidiophores usually arising from the aerial hyphae, solitary or lecanicillium-like with conidiogenous cells in whorls of two to three. Conidiogenous cells 7.0–12.0 × 1.0–1.5 μm, with a cylindrical basal portion, bearing numerous denticles, tapering into a distinct neck. Conidia hyaline, ellipsoidal to fusiform, 1-celled, 2.4–3.9 × 1.5–2.8 μm. Octahedral crystals not observed.

Figure 7. 

Gamszarella sinensis A infected spider (Araneae) B, C PDA culture plate showing top (B) and reverse (C) sides of the colony D–L conidiogenous cells and conidia were stained with cotton blue M conidiogenous cells and conidia. Scale bars: 10 mm (B, C); 10 μm (D–M).

Host

Spider (Araneae).

Additional material examined

China • Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, Wudang District, Bala Valley (26°45'7.0344"N, 106°58'57.09"E). On a dead spider (Araneae), 5 April 2024, Wanhao Chen, WD04082 (living culture).

Remarks

The new strains were identified as a member in Gamszarella, based on the BLASTn result in NCBI. The phylogenetic analyses of the combined dataset 2 (Fig. 2) showed that the new strains clustered as an independent clade with a close relationship to Gamszarella antillana (R.F. Castañeda & G.R.W. Arnold) Crous and G. buffelskloofina Crous. Compared with the typical characteristics of the known species (Table 3), the new taxon, Gamszarella sinensis was distinguished from G. antillana by its shorter conidiogenous cells bearing numerous denticles (Numerous denticles, 7.0–12.0 × 1.0–1.5 μm vs. absent of denticles, 18–31 × 1 μm), ellipsoidal to fusiform conidia and absent of octahedral crystals. Gamszarella sinensis was distinguished from G. buffelskloofina by its shorter conidiogenous cells (7.0–12.0 × 1.0–1.5 μm vs. 7–22 × 1.5–2 μm), smaller ellipsoidal to fusiform conidia [2.4–3.9 × 1.5–2.8 μm vs. (3–)4–6(–10) × 2 μm] and spider host. Gamszarella sinensis was distinguished from G. vallensis by its longer conidiogenous cells (7.0–12.0 × 1.0–1.5 μm vs. 3.8–5.4 × 1.3–1.9 μm). Thus, the morphological characteristics and molecular phylogenetic results support G. sinensis as a new species.

Table 3.

Morphological comparison of the new species with other Gamszarella species.

Species Conidiogenous cells (μm) Conidia (μm) Octahedral crystals Hosts/ substrate References
G. antillana No denticles, 18–31 × 1 Two types: primary conidia fusiform, 11–18 × 0.8–1.5; secondary conidia ellipsoidal, 3–4 × 0.8–1.2 Present Agaric Zare and Gams 2001
G. buffelskloofina Terminating in a cluster of denticles, 7–22 × 1.5–2 Subcylindrical, (3–)4–6(–10) × 2 Absent Insect Crous et al. 2023
G. sinensis Numerous denticles, 7.0–12.0 × 1.0–1.5 Ellipsoidal to fusiform, 2.4–3.9 × 1.5–2.8 Absent Spider This study
G. vallensis Numerous denticles, 3.8–5.4 × 1.3–1.9 Ellipsoidal to fusiform, 2.3–3.0 × 1.7–1.9 Absent Spider This study

Gamszarella vallensis W.H. Chen, Y.F. Han & J.D. Liang, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 856389
Fig. 8

Etymology

Referring to its location, Bala Valley, where the fungus was first discovered.

Type

China • Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, Wudang District, Bala Valley (26°45'7.0344"N, 106°58'57.09"E). On a dead spider (Araneae), 5 April 2024, Wanhao Chen, GZAC WD0410 (holotype), ex-type, WD04101.

Description

Colonies on PDA reaching 25–36 mm diam in 14 d at 25 °C, white, consisting of a basal felt and cottony, floccose overgrowth, reverse yellowish, with radial patterns. Prostrate hyphae smooth, septate, hyaline, 1.5–2.0 μm diam. Conidial structures consisting of erect conidiophores usually arising from the aerial hyphae, solitary or lecanicillium-like with conidiogenous cells in whorls of two to four. Conidiogenous cells 3.8–5.4 × 1.3–1.9 μm, with a cylindrical basal portion, bearing numerous denticles, tapering into a distinct neck. Conidia hyaline, ellipsoidal to fusiform, 1-celled, 2.3–3.0 × 1.7–1.9 μm. Octahedral crystals not observed.

Figure 8. 

Gamszarella vallensis A infected spider B, C pda culture plate showing top (B) and reverse (C) sides of the colony D–J conidiogenous cells and conidia were stained with cotton blue K, L conidiogenous cells and conidia. Scale bars: 10 mm (B, C); 10 μm (D–L).

Host

Spider (Araneae).

Additional material examined

China • Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, Wudang District, Bala Valley (26°45'7.0344"N, 106°58'57.09"E). On a dead spider (Araneae), 5 April 2024, Wanhao Chen, WD04102 (living culture).

Remarks

Gamszarella vallensis was identified as in Gamszarella, based on the BLASTn results in NCBI. The phylogenetic analysis of the combined dataset 2 (Fig. 2) showed that the new strains clustered into an independent clade with a close relationship with Gamszarella antillana and G. buffelskloofina. Compared with the typical characteristics of the known species (Table 3), Gamszarella vallensis was distinguished from G. antillana by its shorter conidiogenous cells bearing numerous denticles (3.8–5.4 × 1.3–1.9 μm vs. 18–31 × 1 μm), ellipsoidal to fusiform conidia and absent of octahedral crystals. Gamszarella vallensis was distinguished from G. buffelskloofina by its shorter conidiogenous cells (3.8–5.4 × 1.3–1.9 μm vs. 7–22 × 1.5–2 μm), smaller ellipsoidal to fusiform conidia [2.3–3.0 × 1.7–1.9 μm vs. (3–)4–6(–10) × 2 μm] and spider host. Gamszarella vallensis was distinguished from G. sinensis by its shorter conidiogenous cells (3.8–5.4 × 1.3–1.9 μm vs. 7.0–12.0 × 1.0–1.5 μm). Thus, the morphological characteristics and molecular phylogenetic results support G. vallensis as a new species.

Neogamszarella W.H. Chen, Y.F. Han & J.D. Liang, gen. nov.

MycoBank No: 856411

Etymology

Named after its morphological similarity to the genus Gamszarella.

Type species

Neogamszarella antillana (R.F. Castañeda & G.R.W. Arnold) W.H. Chen, Y.F. Han & J.D. Liang (Basionym = Verticillium antillanum R.F. Castañeda & G.R.W. Arnold, Feddes Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 98 (7–8): 411, 1987).

Description

Colonies on PDA, white, with cream-colored reverse, without diffusing pigment into the agar. Conidiogenous cells developing on prostrate hyphae, single or up to 6 in verticils, subulate. Conidia solitary and of two types. Octahedral crystals present.

Host

Agaric (Hymenomycetes).

Sexual morph

Unknown.

Remarks

The genus Gamszarella was established with the type species G. buffelskloofina and two species, G. antillana and G. magnispora (Z.F. Zhang & L. Cai) Crous based on the phylogenetic analysis (Crous et al. 2023). Khonsanit et al. (2024) introduced a new genus Corpulentispora Khons., Thanakitp. & Luangsa-ard to accommodate Gamszarella magnispora based on the phylogenetic analysis and morphological characteristics. The morphological characteristics of Gamszarella buffelskloofina are conidiogenous cells subcylindrical with apical taper, terminating in a cluster of denticles and only one type of subcylindrical conidia (Crous et al. 2023). While the morphological characteristics of Gamszarella antillana are conidiogenous cells absent of denticles and produce two types of fusoid conidia, macroconidia and microconidia. G. antillana do not fit with the genus Gamszarella. Thus, a new genus is proposed to accommodate species Gamszarella antillana.

Neogamszarella antillana (R.F. Castañeda & G.R.W. Arnold) W.H. Chen, Y.F. Han & J.D. Liang, comb. nov.

MycoBank No: 856412

= Verticillium antillanum R.F. Castañeda & G.R.W. Arnold, Feddes Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 98 (7–8): 411, 1987. Basionym.

= Lecanicillium antillanum (R.F. Castañeda & G.R.W. Arnold) Zare & W. Gams, Nova Hedwigia 73(1–2): 34, 2001.

= Gamszarella antillana (R.F. Castañeda & G.R.W. Arnold) Crous, Persoonia 51: 391, 2023.

Remarks

Verticillium antillanum was transferred to the genus Lecanicillium by Zare and Gams (2001). Crous et al. (2023) introduced a new genus Gamszarella and combined Lecanicillium antillanum with Gamszarella based on the phylogenetic analysis. The morphological characteristics of Gamszarella antillana were similar to Corniculantispora aranearum (Petch) Khons. et al., C. dimorpha (J.D. Chen) Khons. et al., C. psalliotae (Treschew) Khons. et al., Flavocillium acerosum (Zare & W. Gams) H. Yu et al., and both species produce two types of conidia (Wang et al. 2020; Khonsanit et al. 2024). However, Gamszarella antillana was distinguished from Corniculantispora aranearum, C. dimorpha, C. psalliotae and Flavocillium acerosum by the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2). Besides, the morphological characteristics of Gamszarella antillana do not fit with the typical characteristics of the genus Gamszarella. Thus, Gamszarella antillana was combined into the new genus Neogamszarella as Neogamszarella antillana.

Discussion

Karst regions in southwestern China are one of the world’s 36 biodiversity hotspots, home to a wide range of endemic species (Delgado-Baquerizo et al. 2020). Wijayawardene et al. (2021) discussed the necessity of systematic studies to reveal novel taxa in Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau. Many new entomopathogenic fungi were found in the Kasit regions of Yunnan and Guizhou Provinces (Peng et al. 2023, 2024; Tang et al. 2023a, b; Xiao et al. 2023, 2024; Zhang et al. 2023; Chen et al. 2024; Dai et al. 2024; Fan et al. 2024; Wang et al. 2024b). Besides, there is high spider diversity in the Karst regions, especially in caves (Zhang and Li 2014; Liu et al. 2023).

The present study introduces four new species of Chlorocillium and Gamszarella from spiders. Chlorocillium species are often found on spiders, aphids and scale insects (Zare and Gams 2016). The taxonomic delimitation of Chlorocillium was originally based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of ITS or LSU sequences (Zare and Gams 2016). Tan and Shivas (2023, 2024) reported two new species based on phylogenetic analysis of ITS, LSU, RPB2, and tef-1α sequences. In this study, we introduce two new species of Chlorocillium viz., C. guizhouense and C. vallense, based on both morpho-molecular data (ITS, LSU and tef-1α) (Figs 1, 5, 6). Moreover, PHI test was carried out to visualize the differences among Chlorocillium species, and supports the results of morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 3). Therefore, combined analysis of morphological characteristics, phylogenetic analysis and other methods may benefit the taxonomy of Chlorocillium.

Crous et al. (2023) introduced Gamszarella with the type species G. buffelskloofina and transferred Lecanicillium antillanum (Castañeda & G. Arold) Zare & W. Gams and L. magnisporum Z.F. Zhang & L. Cai into Gamszarella based on the phylogenetic analysis and morphological characteristics. Khonsanit et al. (2024) proposed a new genus Corpulentispora Khons. et al. to accommodate Gamszarella magnispora. In the present study, two new species of Gamszarella viz., G. sinensis and G. vallensis, are introduced based on both morpho-molecular data (ITS, LSU, RPB2 and tef-1α) (Figs 2, 7, 8). However, the morphological characteristics of Gamszarella antillana were significantly different from G. buffelskloofina, G. sinensis and G. vallensis by its two types of conidia, no denticles, presence of octahedral crystals and Agaric substrate. Thus, we proposed a new genus, Neogamszarella, to accommodate this species.

Our study confirms the high fungal diversity associated with arthropods in South-Western China. Nevertheless, fungi associated with spiders are poorly known and need thorough, systematic exploration.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This work was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31860002, 81960692), High-level Innovative Talents Training Object in Guizhou Province (Qiankehepingtairencai [2020]6005), Construction Program of Key Laboratory of Guizhou Province (Qiankehepingtairencai-ZDSYS[2023]004), Research Center Project of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Guizhongyi ZX hezi [2024]021).

Author contributions

Data curation: WHC. Formal analysis: JDL. Funding acquisition: WYT, YFH, JHZ, WHC. Methodology: YFH. Resources: WHC. Writing - original draft: HLS, WHC, JDL, DL. Writing - review and editing: WYT, YFH, JHZ.

Author ORCIDs

Wan-Hao Chen https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7240-6841

Dan Li https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0256-6749

Hui-Lin Shu https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1905-595X

Jian-Dong Liang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3939-3900

Jie-Hong Zhao https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2972-382X

Wei-Yi Tian https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7365-2796

Yan-Feng Han https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8646-3975

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Castlebury LA, Rossman AY, Sung GH, Hyten AS, Spatafora JW (2004) Multigene phylogeny reveals new lineage for Stachybotrys chartarum, the indoor air fungus. Mycological Research 108(8): 864–872. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756204000607
  • Chaiwan N, Jeewon R, Pem D, Jayawardena RS, Nazurally N, Mapook A, Promputtha I, Hyde KD (2022) Fungal species from Rhododendron sp.: Discosia rhododendricola sp. nov., Neopestalotiopsis rhododendricola sp. nov. and Diaporthe nobilis as a new host record. Journal of Fungi 8(9): 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8090907
  • Chen WH, Wang YR, Wang Y, Han YF, Zou X, Liang ZQ (2012) A new record of Gibellula Cavara in China. Journal of Mountain Agreculture and Biology 31(6): 474–476.
  • Chen WH, Han YF, Liang ZQ, Zou X (2016b) Morphological traits, DELTA system, and molecular analysis for Gibellula clavispora sp. nov. from China. Mycotaxon 131(1): 111–121. https://doi.org/10.5248/131.111
  • Chen WH, Liu C, Han YF, Liang JD, Tian WY, Liang ZQ (2019b) Three novel insect-associated species of Simplicillium (Cordycipitaceae, Hypocreales) from Southwest China. MycoKeys 58: 83–102. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.58.37176
  • Chen WH, Liang JD, Ren XX, Zhao JH, Han YF, Liang ZQ (2022a) Phylogenetic, ecological and morphological characteristics reveal two new spider-associated genera in Clavicipitaceae. MycoKeys 91: 49–66. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.91.86812
  • Chen WH, Liang JD, Ren XX, Zhao JH, Han YF, Liang ZQ (2022b) Multigene phylogeny, phylogenetic network, and morphological characterizations reveal four new arthropod-associated Simplicillium species and their evolutional relationship. Frontiers in Microbiology 13: 950773. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.950773
  • Chen WH, Liang JD, Ren XX, Zhao JH, Han YF, Liang ZQ (2022c) Species diversity of Cordyceps-like fungi in the Tiankeng Karst region of China. Microbiology Spectrum 10(5): e01975–e22. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01975-22
  • Chen WH, Liang JD, Ren XX, Zhao JH, Han YF (2023) Study on species diversity of Akanthomyces (Cordycipitaceae, Hypocreales) in the Jinyun Mountains, Chongqing, China. MycoKeys 98: 299–315. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.98.106415
  • Chen WH, Li D, Liang JD, Ren XX, Zhao JH, Han YF (2024) Chlorocillium sinense sp. nov. (Clavicipitaceae) and Calcarisporium guizhouense sp. nov. (Calcarisporiaceae) in Hypocreales from China. MycoKeys 109: 91–107. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.109.128060
  • Crous PW, Gams W, Stalpers JA, Robert V, Stegehuis G (2004) MycoBank: An online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century. Studies in Mycology 50(1): 19–22.
  • Crous PW, Costa MM, Kandemir H, Vermaas M, Vu D, Zhao L, Arumugam E, Flakus A, Jurjević Ž, Kaliyaperumal M, Mahadevakumar S, Murugadoss R, Shivas RG, Tan YP, Wingfield MJ, Abell SE, Marney TS, Danteswari C, Darmostuk V, Denchev CM, Denchev TT, Etayo J, Gené J, Gunaseelan S, Hubka V, Illescas T, Jansen GM, Kezo K, Kumar S, Larsson E, Mufeeda KT, Piątek M, Rodriguez-Flakus P, Sarma PVSRN, Stryjak-Bogacka M, Torres-Garcia D, Vauras J, Acal DA, Akulov A, Alhudaib K, Asif M, Balashov S, Baral HO, Baturo-Cieśniewska A, Begerow D, Beja-Pereira A, Bianchinotti MV, Bilański P, Chandranayaka S, Chellappan N, Cowan DA, Custódio FA, Czachura P, Delgado G, De Silva NI, Dijksterhuis J, Dueñas M, Eisvand P, Fachada V, Fournier J, Fritsche Y, Fuljer F, Ganga KGG, Guerra MP, Hansen K, Hywel-Jones N, Ismail AM, Jacobs CR, Jankowiak R, Karich A, Kemler M, Kisło K, Klofac W, Krisai-Greilhuber I, Latha KPD, Lebeuf R, Lopes ME, Lumyong S, Maciá-Vicente JG, Maggs-Kölling G, Magistà D, Manimohan P, Martín MP, Mazur E, Mehrabi-Koushki M, Miller AN, Mombert A, Ossowska EA, Patejuk K, Pereira OL, Piskorski S, Plaza M, Podile AR, Polhorský A, Pusz W, Raza M, Ruszkiewicz-Michalska M, Saba M, Sánchez RM, Singh R, Śliwa L, Smith ME, Stefenon VM, Strašiftáková D, Suwannarach N, Szczepańska K, Telleria MT, Tennakoon DS, Thines M, Thorn RG, Urbaniak J, van der Vegte M, Vasan V, Vila-Viçosa C, Voglmayr H, Wrzosek M, Zappelini J, Groenewald JZ (2023) Fungal Planet description sheets: 1550–1613. Persoonia 51(1): 280–417. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2023.51.08
  • Dai YD, Chen SQ, Wang YB, Wang Y, Yang ZL, Yu H (2024) Molecular phylogenetics of the Ophiocordyceps sinensis-species complex lineage (Ascomycota, Hypocreales), with the discovery of new species and predictions of species distribution. IMA Fungus 15(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-023-00131-8
  • Delgado-Baquerizo M, Reich PB, Trivedi C, Eldridge DJ, Abades S, Alfaro DF, Bastida F, Berhe AA, Cutler NA, Gallardo A, García-Velázquez L, Hart SC, Hayes PE, He JZ, Hseu ZY, Hu HW, Kirchmair M, Neuhauser S, Pérez CA, Reed SC, Santos F, Sullivan BW, Trivedi P, Wang JT, Weber-Grullon L, Williams MA, Singh BK (2020) Multiple elements of soil biodiversity drive ecosystem functions across biomes. Nature Ecology & Evolution 4(2): 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1084-y
  • Fan Q, Yang T, Li H, Wang XM, Liao HF, Shen PH, Yang ZL, Zeng WB, Wang YB (2024) Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal two new entomopathogenic species of Ophiocordyceps (Ophiocordycipitaceae, Hypocreales) parasitic on termites from China. MycoKeys 103: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.103.116153
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TK, Von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Khonsanit A, Thanakitpipattana D, Mongkolsamrit S, Kobmoo N, Phosrithong N, Samson RA, Crous PW, Luangsa-ard JJ (2024) A phylogenetic assessment of Akanthomyces sensu lato in Cordycipitaceae (Hypocreales, Sordariomycetes): Introduction of new genera, and the resurrection of Lecanicillium. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 14: 271–305. https://doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2024.14.17
  • Kobayasi Y (1941) The genus Cordyceps and its allies. Science Reports of the Tokyo Kyoiku Daigaku, Section B. Koishikawa, Japan 84: 53–260.
  • Kobayasi Y, Shimizu D (1982) Cordyceps species from Japan 4. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series B 8: 79–91.
  • Liang JD, Han YF, Zhang JW, Du W, Liang ZQ, Li ZZ (2011) Optimal culture conditions for keratinase production by a novel thermophilic Myceliophthora thermophila strain GZUIFR-H49-1. Journal of Applied Microbiology 110(4): 871–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04949.x
  • Liu S, Zhou C, Lin Y (2023) New Insights into the variation and admixture of the Cave-Dwelling Spider Trogloneta yunnanensis in South China Karst. Animals 13(7): 1244. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071244
  • Mongkolsamrit S, Noisripoom W, Thanakitpipattana D, Wutikhun T, Spatafora JW, Luangsa-ard J (2018) Disentangling cryptic species with isaria-like morphs in Cordycipitaceae. Mycologia 110(1): 230–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2018.1446651
  • Özkan K, Gulsoy S, Mert A, Ozturk M, Muys B (2010) Plant distribution-altitude and landform relationships in karstic sinkholes of Mediterranean region of Turkey. Journal of Environmental Biology 31(1): 51–60.
  • Peng XC, Xiao YP, Zhang Y, Chomnunti P, Tangtrakulwanich K, Wen TC (2023) Cordyceps poluscapitis sp. nov., an antpathogenic fungus from Guizhou, China. Phytotaxa 599(4): 239–251. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.599.4.3
  • Peng XC, Wen TC, Wei DP, Liao YH, Wang Y, Zhang X, Wang GY, Zhou Y, Tangtrakulwanich K, Liang JD (2024) Two new species and one new combination of Ophiocordyceps (Hypocreales, Ophiocordycipitaceae) in Guizhou. MycoKeys 102: 245–266. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.102.113351
  • Quaedvlieg W, Binder M, Groenewald JZ, Summerell BA, Carnegie AJ, Burgess TI, Crous W (2014) Introducing the consolidated species concept to resolve species in the Teratosphaeriaceae. Persoonia 33(1): 1–40. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158514X681981
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Samson RA, Evans HC (1975) Notes on entomogenous fungi from Ghana. III. The genus Hymenostilbe. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series C 78: 73–80.
  • Shrestha B, Kubátová A, Tanaka E, Oh J, Yoon DH, Sung JM, Sung GH (2019) Spider-pathogenic fungi within Hypocreales (Ascomycota): Their current nomenclature, diversity, and distribution. Mycological Progress 18(8): 983–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-019-01512-3
  • Su Y, Tang Q, Mo F, Xue Y (2017) Karst tiankengs as refugia for indigenous tree flora amidst a degraded landscape in southwestern China. Scientific Reports 7(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04592-x
  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(12): 2725–2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
  • Tan YP, Shivas RG (2023) Nomenclatural novelties. Index of Australian Fungi 22: 1–14.
  • Tan YP, Shivas RG (2024) Nomenclatural novelties. Index of Australian Fungi 31: 1–12.
  • Tang DX, Xu ZH, Wang Y, Wang YB, Tran NL, Yu H (2023b) Multigene phylogeny and morphology reveal two novel zombie-ant fungi in Ophiocordyceps (Ophiocordycipitaceae, Hypocreales). Mycological Progress 22(4): 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-023-01874-9
  • Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen LT, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2016) W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 44(W1): W232–W235. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256
  • Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R (2011) SequenceMatrix: Concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27(2): 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00329.x
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172(8): 4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
  • Wang YB, Wang Y, Fan Q, Duan DE, Dai RQ, Dai YD, Zeng WB, Chen ZH, Li DD, Tang DX, Xu ZH, Sun T, Nguyen TT, Tran NL, Dao VM, Zhang CM, Huang LD, Liu YJ, Zhang XM, Yang DR, Sanjuan T, Liu XZ, Yang ZL, Yu H (2020) Multigene phylogeny of the family Cordycipitaceae (Hypocreales): New taxa and the new systematic position of the Chinese cordycipitoid fungus Paecilomyces hepiali. Fungal Diversity 103(1): 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-020-00457-3
  • Wang Y, Wang ZQ, Luo R, Souvanhnachit S, Thanarut C, Dao VM, Yu H (2024b) Species diversity and major host/substrate associations of the genus Akanthomyces (Hypocreales, Cordycipitaceae). MycoKeys 101: 113–141. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.101.109751
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (Eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
  • Wijayawardene NN, Dissanayake LS, Li QR, Dai DQ, Xiao Y, Wen TC, Karunarathna SC, Wu HX, Zhang H, Tibpromma S, Kang JC, Wang Y, Shen XC, Tang LZ, Deng CY, Liu YX, Kang YQ (2021) Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau: A mycological hotspot. Phytotaxa 523(1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.523.1.1
  • Xiao YP, Wang YB, Hyde KD, Eleni G, Sun JZ, Yang Y, Meng J, Yu H, Wen TC (2023) Polycephalomycetaceae, a new family of clavicipitoid fungi segregates from Ophiocordycipitaceae. Fungal Diversity 120(1): 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-023-00517-4
  • Xiao YP, Yang Y, Jayawardena RS, Gentekaki E, Luo ZL (2024) Four novel Pleurocordyceps (Polycephalomycetaceae) species from China. Frontiers in Microbiology 14: 1256967. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1256967
  • Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlic I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang GT (2020) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20(1): 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13096
  • Zhang Y, Wen TC, Xiao YP, Yang Y, Peng XC (2023) A new species of Papiliomyces (Clavicipiteae, Hypocreales) from China. Biodiversity Data Journal 11: e86868. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e86868
  • Zou X, Liu AY, Liang ZQ, Han YF, Yang M (2010) Hirsutella liboensis, a new entomopathogenic species affecting Cossidae (Lepidoptera) in China. Mycotaxon 111(1): 39–44. https://doi.org/10.5248/111.39
  • Zou X, Han YF, Liang ZQ, Qu JJ (2021) Two new species of entomopathogenic fungi producing synnema. Journal of Mountain Agriculture and Biology 40(6): 1–10.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

The genera of araneogenous fungi in the order Hypocreales

Wan-Hao Chen, Dan Li, Hui-Lin Shu, Jian-Dong Liang, Jie-Hong Zhao, Wei-Yi Tian, Yan-Feng Han

Data type: docx

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (19.35 kb)
login to comment