Research Article
Print
Research Article
New Aquilariomyces and Mangifericomes species (Pleosporales, Ascomycota) from Aquilaria spp. in China
expand article infoTian-Ye Du§, Samantha C. Karunarathna, Kevin D. Hyde§, Somrudee Nilthong§, Ausana Mapook§, Dong-Qin Dai, Kunhiraman C. Rajeshkumar|, Abdallah M. Elgorban, Li-Su Han, Hao-Han Wang, Saowaluck Tibpromma
‡ Qujing Normal University, Qujing, China
§ Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand
| MACS Agharkar Research Institute, Pune, India
¶ King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Open Access

Abstract

Saprobic fungi are known for their critical role in decomposition and nutrient cycling. The study of saprobic fungi is equally important, as it helps in understanding their ecological roles and identifying their hidden diversity. This study focused on saprobic fungi on Aquilaria, which is poorly studied compared to economically important hosts like coffee, tea, and rubber. Our rigorous process led to the collection of two new terrestrial saprobic fungi from the Guangdong and Yunnan provinces in China. After extensive phylogenetic analyses and detailed comparison of morphological characteristics, the two collections were identified as two new species belonging to Pleosporales, Ascomycota. Aquilariomyces maomingensis sp. nov. was isolated from Aquilaria sinensis in Guangdong Province, while Mangifericomes aquilariae sp. nov. was isolated from Aquilaria sp. in Yunnan Province. Full descriptions, photo plates, and phylogenetic analyses (maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses based on LSU, ITS, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 gene combinations) of the new species are provided, along with a comprehensive list of saprobic fungi associated with Aquilaria spp.

Key words

2 new species, agarwood, saprobes, Thymeleaceae, Thyridariaceae

Introduction

Aquilaria Lam. (Thymeleaceae) is the main plant genus capable of producing agarwood (Lee and Mohamed 2016; Wang et al. 2018; Li et al. 2021). Currently, there are 21 accepted species in Aquilaria, of which 13 have been reported to produce agarwood (Hashim et al. 2016). These trees are tropical and subtropical evergreen broad-leaved trees (Rasool and Mohamed 2016; Xu et al. 2016), widely distributed in Asia, such as Borneo, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, New Guinea, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam, (Wang et al. 2018; 2019). In China, Aquilaria sinensis is the primary source of agarwood resin (National Pharmacopoeia Committee 2020).

In recent years, a large number of articles have been published on fungi related to Aquilaria and agarwood, and it has been found that fungal induction can effectively induce the production of agarwood (Laurence 2013; Liu et al. 2013; Azren et al. 2018; Chen et al. 2018; Subasinghe et al. 2019; Tibpromma et al. 2021; Du et al. 2022a). Du et al. (2022a,b) reported endophytic fungi from agarwood, with the majority belonging to Ascomycota Caval.-Sm. (mainly from Botryosphaeria spp., Fusarium spp., and Lasiodiplodia spp.). In addition, as an important economic plant, the pathogenic fungi of Aquilaria have also been extensively studied, and the reported pathogenic fungi mainly belong to Ascomycota, which cause damage to different parts of trees, such as seedling anthracnose (e.g., Colletotrichum fructicola Prihast., L. Cai & K.D. Hyde), dieback (e.g., Lasiodiplodia theobromae (Pat.) Griffon & Maubl.), and leaf spot disease (e.g., Corynespora cassiicola (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) C.T. Wei) (Borah et al. 2012; Fan et al. 2013; Liao et al. 2018). However, the saprobic fungi of Aquilaria have received very little attention. Initially, most saprobic fungi were introduced only based on morphological characteristics, but without molecular data. Du et al. (2022c) initiated exploring and investigating the saprobic fungi of Aquilaria spp. based on both morphological and molecular evidence. Some saprobic fungi have recently been discovered on Aquilaria spp. in China (Du et al. 2022c, 2023, 2024a, b; Manawasinghe et al. 2024; Tao et al. 2024; Zhang et al. 2024). So far, there are 34 records of saprobic fungi associated with Aquilaria, while these saprobes almost all belong to Ascomycota (Du et al. 2024b).

Saprobic fungi, an important component of ecosystems, participate in the carbon cycle by decomposing organic matter (Šnajdr et al. 2011; Li et al. 2022; Niego et al. 2023a). As decomposers, they dominate the litter layer in all forest ecosystems (e.g., tropical, subtropical, temperate, and boreal forests) (Li et al. 2022; Niego et al. 2023b). With increasing attention to ecosystems, extensive research has been conducted on saprobic fungi associated with various plants in recent years. Over 800 taxa have been reported on rubber, of which over half were isolated from leaf and branch litter (Senwanna et al. 2021; Nizamani et al. 2023; Xu et al. 2024). Tian et al. (2024) recently reported 77 saprobic fungi from coconut, pineapple, and rice. In contrast, only 34 records of saprobic fungi are linked to Aquilaria spp.; thus, further investigations are required to address this knowledge gap.

In this study, we introduce two new ascomycete species, Aquilariomyces maomingensis (Thyridariaceae, Pleosporales) and Mangifericomes aquilariae (Pleosporales genus incertae sedis, Wijayawardene et al. 2022; Hyde et al. 2024a) based on morphological studies and multilocus phylogenetic analyses. Comprehensive descriptions, photo plates of macro- and micro-morphological characteristics, and phylogenetic analyses highlighting the placement of new taxa are provided. In addition, a list of Aquilaria-associated saprobic fungi is provided.

Materials and methods

Sampling, examination, and isolation

Specimens were collected from agarwood (Aquilaria spp.) plantations in Guangdong and Yunnan provinces, China, and the necessary information was recorded (Rathnayaka et al. 2024). Each specimen was put in plastic bags, recorded collection information, and then transported to the laboratory at Qujing Normal University. Morphological characteristics were examined using an OPTEC SZ650 dissecting stereomicroscope (Chongqing, China), and fungal microstructures were observed and photographed using an OLYMPUS DP74 (Tokyo, Japan) digital camera on an OLYMPUS optical microscope (Tokyo, Japan). Morphological structures were measured in the Tarosoft® Image Framework program v. 1.3, and photo plates were edited in Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended version 22.0.0 software (Adobe Systems, California, the USA).

Single-spore isolation technique was performed according to the description by Senanayake et al. (2020). The fruiting bodies were cut using sterile blades, and sterile needles were used to pick out the ascospores and place them in ddH2O on a glass slide. The ascospores in the water were dispersed into a spore suspension and transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA) for culture at 23–28 °C for 12–48 hours. Then, the single germinated ascospores were picked up and transferred to a new PDA with recording culture characters.

Specimens were deposited at the Guizhou Medical University (GMB-W) and Mycological Herbarium of Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering (MHZU), China. Living cultures were deposited in the Guizhou Medical University Culture Collection (GMBCC), Guizhou Culture Collection (GZCC), and Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering Culture Collection (ZHKUCC), China. Facesoffungi (FoF) numbers were registered as described in Jayasiri et al. (2015), and MycoBank numbers (MB) were registered as outlined in MycoBank (http://www.MycoBank.org).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

Molecular studies were carried out according to Tian et al. (2024). Total genomic DNA was extracted from one-month-old fresh fungal mycelium cultured in PDA using a DNA Extraction Kit-BSC14S1 (BioFlux, Hangzhou, P.R. China), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was stored at 4 °C for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), while the remaining DNA was maintained at -20 °C for long-term storage. The PCR mixture (25 μL) contains 12.5 μL of 2xMaster Mix (mixture of Easy Taq TM DNA Polymerase, dNTPs, and optimized buffer (Beijing Trans Gen Biotech Co., Chaoyang District, Beijing, China)), 8.5 μL of ddH2O, and 1 μL of each forward and reverse primer (10 pM) and 2 μL of DNA template (Tibpromma et al. 2018). The PCR was carried out using the following primers: The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region was amplified with the primers ITS4 and ITS5 (White et al. 1990); the 28S large subunit (LSU) region was amplified using the primers LR0R and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990); the 18S small subunit (SSU) region was amplified using the primers NS1 and NS4 (White et al. 1990); the partial translation elongation factor1-alpha (tef1-α) gene was amplified using the primers EF1-983F and EF1-2218R (Rehner 2001); and the partial RNA polymerase II subunit (rpb2) region was amplified with primers fRPB2-5F and fRPB2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999). The PCR thermal cycle programs for LSU, ITS, SSU, and tef1-α were as follows: an initialization step of 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, an annealing step at 55 °C for 50 s, an elongation step at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension step of 72 °C for 10 min; and the PCR thermal cycle programs for rpb2 were as follows: an initialization step of 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 50 s, an annealing step at 57 °C for 50 s, an elongation step at 72 °C for 90 s, and a final extension step of 72 °C for 10 min. Purification and sequencing of PCR products were carried out using the same primers by Sangon Biotech Co., Kunming, China.

Phylogenetic analyses

Phylogenetic analyses were carried out according to Dissanayake et al. (2020). Both reverse and forward sequences generated in this study were assembled using Geneious 9.1.8 (https://www.geneious.com) (Kearse et al. 2012), and newly generated sequences were searched using the BLASTn in NCBI (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch) to identify the most similar taxa. The additional sequences included in the analyses were collected from recent publications (Yang et al. 2022; Du et al. 2024b) and downloaded from GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/WebSub/?form=history&tool=genbank). The FASTA file was created using the OFPT (Zeng et al. 2023) with the protocol used for constructing the Randomized Accelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAxML) and Bayesian Inference analyses (BI). Then FASTA format was converted to PHYLIP (for RAxML) and NEXUS formats (for BI), respectively, using ALTER (http://www.sing-group.org/ALTER/) (Glez-Peña et al. 2010).

The RAxML was generated on the CIPRES Science Gateway (https://www.phylo.org/portal2/login!input.action) (Miller et al. 2010), using RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE (8.2.12) with 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Stamatakis et al. 2008; Stamatakis 2014) and the GTR+I+G model of evolution and bootstrap supports. The BI tree was performed with MrBayes on XSEDE (3.2.7a) (Ronquist et al. 2012), and the best models of evolution were estimated using MrModeltest v. 2.3 (Nylander et al. 2008). Six simultaneous Markov chains were run for 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 generations, and the tree was sampled every 100th generation. The phylogenetic tree was visualized in FigTree v.1.4.2 (Rambaut 2012) and edited by Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2021 and Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended version 22.0.0 software (Adobe Systems, California, the USA). All newly generated sequences in this study were deposited to GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/WebSub/?form=history&tool=genbank).

A list of saprobic fungi associated with Aquilaria

A list of reported saprobic fungi associated with Aquilaria spp. is listed in Table 1, and the percentage of different classes is shown in Fig. 1, which includes two new species introduced in this study. This list includes the host and distributions, molecular data, and relevant references of Aquilaria-associated saprobic fungi.

Figure 1. 

Aquilaria spp.-associated saprobic fungi in different classes and incertae sedis.

Table 1.

A list of saprobic fungi reported on Aquilaria spp.

Host species Host countries Phylum Class Fungal species Molecular data References
A. agallocha Bangladesh Ascomycota Sordariomycetes Phomopsis aquilariae NA Punithalingam and Gibson 1978
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Sordariomycetes Allocryptovalsa aquilariae ITS and TUB Chethana et al. 2023
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Aquilariomyces maomingensis ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 This study
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Barriopsis stevensiana ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α Hyde et al. 2024c
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Camarographium clematidis ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α Du et al. 2024b
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Melomastia aquilariae LSU, SSU, and tef1-α Manawasinghe et al. 2024
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Melomastia guangdongensis LSU, SSU, and tef1-α Du et al. 2024a
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Melomastia maomingensis ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 Du et al. 2024b
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Montagnula aquilariae ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α Hyde et al. 2023
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Nigrograna aquilariae ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 Du et al. 2024b
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Sordariomycetes Peroneutypa aquilariae ITS and TUB Du et al. 2022c
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Sordariomycetes Peroneutypa maomingensis ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2, and TUB Du et al. 2024b
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Pseudothyridariella aquilariae ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 Du et al. 2024b
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Rhytidhysteron thailandicum ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α Du et al. 2023
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Sordariomycetes Triangularia aquilariae ITS, LSU, SSU, rpb2, and TUB Du et al. 2024b
A. sinensis China Ascomycota Sordariomycetes Allocryptovalsa rabenhorstii ITS and TUB Hyde et al. 2024c
Aquilaria sp. China Ascomycota Sordariomycetes Allocryptovalsa castaneae ITS and TUB Zhang et al. 2024
Aquilaria sp. Thailand Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Cercosporella sp. NA Subansenee et al. 1985
Aquilaria sp. Thailand Ascomycota Sordariomycetes Chaetomium spirale NA Subansenee et al. 1985
Aquilaria sp. Thailand Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Cladosporium sp. NA Subansenee et al. 1985
Aquilaria sp. China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Mangifericomes aquilariae ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 This study
Aquilaria sp. China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Melomastia clematidis LSU, SSU, and tef1-α Tao et al. 2024
Aquilaria sp. China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Melomastia sinensis LSU, SSU, and tef1-α Du et al. 2024a
Aquilaria sp. China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Melomastia winteri LSU, SSU, and tef1-α Hyde et al. 2024c
Aquilaria sp. China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Melomastia yunnanensis LSU, SSU, and tef1-α Du et al. 2024a
Aquilaria sp. China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Nigrograna magnoliae ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α Hyde et al. 2024c
Aquilaria sp. Thailand Ascomycota Sordariomycetes Phialogeniculata sp. NA Subansenee et al. 1985
Aquilaria sp. Thailand Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Pithomyces sp. NA Subansenee et al. 1985
Aquilaria sp. China Ascomycota Incertae sedis Pseudoacrodictys deightonii ITS, LSU, SSU, and TUB Hyde et al. 2024c
Aquilaria sp. Thailand Mucoromycota Mucoromycetes Rhizopus sp. NA Subansenee et al. 1985
Aquilaria sp. China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Thyridaria aureobrunnea ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 Hyde et al. 2024c
Aquilaria sp. Thailand Ascomycota Sordariomycetes Trichoderma sp. NA Subansenee et al. 1985
A. yunnanensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Aquilariomyces aquilariae ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 Du et al. 2024b
A. yunnanensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Corynespora aquilariae ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α Du et al. 2024b
A. yunnanensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Parathyridariella aquilariae ITS, LSU, SSU, and rpb2 Du et al. 2024b
A. yunnanensis China Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Phaeoseptum aquilariae ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 Du et al. 2024b

Results

Taxonomy

Thyridariaceae Q. Tian & K.D. Hyde, 2013

Aquilariomyces T.Y. Du, Tibpromma & Karun. 2024

Notes

Aquilariomyces was introduced by Du et al. (2024b) as a monotypic genus to accommodate Aq. aquilariae T.Y. Du, Tibpromma & Karun. as the type species, which was collected from Aquilaria yunnanensis S.C. Huang in Yunnan Province, China. Based on well-separated phylogenetic branches and unique sexual morphs of asci and ascospores, Aquilariomyces was introduced as a new genus in Thyridariaceae (Du et al. 2024b). This genus is characterized by globose to subglobose, brown to dark brown, solitary or gregarious ascomata in small groups, immersed under the bark, surrounded by brown to black fluffs; a peridium comprising hyaline to brown cells of textura angularis; hyaline septate, branched, trabeculate pseudoparaphyses, embedded in a gelatinous matrix; 8-spored, bitunicate, clavate, apically rounded asci, with an ocular chamber, and club-shaped, short pedicel; and uniseriate, 1-septate, fusiform to ellipsoidal ascospores, surrounded by mucilaginous sheath, while the asexual morph is not reported. The updated phylogenetic tree of Aquilariomyces is shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 2. 

Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis based on combined LSU, ITS, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 sequence data of 52 taxa, which comprised 4387 base pairs of LSU = 967, ITS = 516, SSU = 872, rpb2 = 1024, tef1-α = 1008. The best-scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of -31596.745436 is presented. The matrix had 2090 distinct alignment patterns, with 47.13% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.249245, C = 0.257277, G = 0.271627, T = 0.221851; substitution rates: AC = 1.210949, AG = 2.948777, AT = 1.318881, CG = 0.897105, CT = 6.444599, GT = 1.0; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.441696. Bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 70% and clade credibility values equal to or greater than 0.90 from Bayesian inference analysis are labelled at each node. The tree is rooted with Trematosphaeria pertusa (CBS 122368). The new isolates are indicated in red, and the ex-type strains are in bold.

Aquilariomyces maomingensis T.Y. Du, K.D. Hyde, Tibpromma & Karun., sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 856409
Fig. 3

Etymology

Named after the location “Maoming,” where the holotype was collected.

Holotype

MHZU 23-0022.

Description

Saprobic on decaying branch of Aquilaria sinensis. Sexual morph: Ascomata (excluding necks) 250–450 μm high × 200–500 μm diam. (x̄ = 366 × 350 μm, n = 5), solitary or gregarious in small groups, brown to dark brown, surrounded by short brown to black fluffs, immersed, slightly raised under the bark, globose to subglobose, sometimes ovoid, ostiolate. Ostiolar canal 250–280 µm long × 150–200 µm wide (x̄ = 263 × 180 µm, n = 10), cylindrical to elliptical, usually straight, dark brown to black necks with periphyses. Peridium 15–70 μm (x̄ = 31 μm, n = 30) wide, comprising 3–5 layers of pale brown to brown cells of textura angularis to textura prismatica, fusing with the host tissue. Hamathecium comprising 1 μm wide, hyaline, septate, branched, numerous, trabeculate pseudoparaphyses (sensu Liew et al. 2000), embedded in a gelatinous matrix. Asci 100–140 × 21–25 μm (x̄ = 123 × 23 μm, n = 30), bitunicate, 8-spored, thick-walled, clavate, apically rounded, with an ocular chamber, short pedicel, some club-shaped. Ascospores 20–36 × 9–15 μm (x̄ = 30 × 13 μm, n = 30), uniseriate, 1-septate, fusiform to ellipsoidal, conical at both ends or round, constricted at the septum, upper cells are slightly larger than below cells, rough-walled, with several guttules and granules, hyaline to pale yellow when immature and surrounded by a mucilaginous sheath, later become yellow-brown and without a mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Figure 3. 

Aquilariomyces maomingensis (MHZU 23-0022, holotype) A–C appearance of ascomata on the host (the arrows indicate ascomata) D, E vertical sections through the ascomata (the arrows indicate ostioles) F ostiole with periphyses G short fluffs around the periphery of the ascomata H peridium I, J trabeculae pseudoparaphyses (J the arrows indicate septate pseudoparaphyses) K–N asci O a club-shaped pedicel P–U ascospores (S stained with Indian ink) V germinated ascospore W, X colonies on PDA obverse and reverse views. Scale bars: 200 µm (D–F); 30 µm (G, H); 10 µm (I); 50 µm (K–N); 20 µm (P–V).

Culture characteristics

Ascospores germinated on PDA after 12 hours, and germ tubes were produced from one or both ends. Colonies on PDA reaching 2–3 cm diam. after two weeks at 23–28 °C. Colonies obverse: dense, circular, or irregular, cream to brown, umbonate, raised at the center, filamentous edge. Colonies reverse dark brown to black at the center and cream to light brown at the margin.

Material examined

China • Guangdong Province, Maoming City, Dianbai District, Poxin Town, 21°34'25"N, 111°7'43"E, on a dead branch of Aquilaria sinensis (Thymelaeaceae), 3 June 2022, T.Y. Du, MMA15 (MHZU 23-0022, holotype), ex-type living culture, GMBCC1047; additional living culture, ZHKUCC 23-0041.

GenBank numbers

GMBCC1047: ITS = PQ604643, LSU = PQ604620, SSU = PQ604624, tef1-α = PQ612415, rpb2 = PQ612419; ZHKUCC 23-0041: ITS = PQ604644, LSU = PQ604621, SSU = PQ604625, tef1-α = PQ612416, rpb2 = PQ612420.

Notes

In the present phylogenetic analyses, our new collection, Aquilariomyces maomingensis, formed a well-separated sister lineage to Aq. aquilariae (ZHKUCC 23-0072 and GZCC 23-0616) with 100% ML and 1.00 BYPP statistical support (Fig. 2). Aquilariomyces maomingensis shares similar morphological characteristics with Aq. aquilariae (MHZU 23-0036, holotype) in having immersed, globose to subglobose ascomata, numerous, septate, branched, trabeculate pseudoparaphyses in a gelatinous matrix, clavate asci, with short and club-shaped pedicel, and uniseriate fusiform to ellipsoidal, 1-septate, ascospores, constricted at the septum, and surrounded by a mucilaginous sheath (Du et al. 2024b). However, Aq. maomingensis (MHZU 23-0022) differs from Aq. aquilariae (MHZU 23-0036) in its ascomata and ascospore characters. Aquilariomyces maomingensis has ascomata surrounded by short fluffs, slightly raised under the bark, and brown mature ascospores, while Aq. aquilariae (MHZU 23-0036) has inconspicuous ascomata, surrounded by long fluffs, and hyaline mature ascospores (Du et al. 2024b). A comparison of the main morphological structures between Aquilariomyces maomingensis and Aq. Aquilariae is shown in Fig. 4.

Figure 4. 

Comparison of morphological structure between Aquilariomyces maomingensis and Aq. aquilariae. Aquilariomyces maomingensis (MHZU 23-0022 holotype) A ascomata wrapped in short fluffs B micrograph of fluffs C brown ascospores. Aquilariomyces aquilariae (MHZU 23-0036, holotype) (Du et al. 2024b) D ascomata wrapped in long fluffs E micrograph of fluffs F hyaline ascospores. Scale bars: 20 µm (B, C, E, F).

According to the phylogenetic analysis of the present study, both Aquilariomyces species clustered in Thyridariaceae, a family characterized by trabeculate or cellular pseudoparaphyses. Trabeculate pseudoparaphyses are characterized by narrow, thread-like, apparently nonseptate, branched, and anastomosing or unbranched above the asci and embedded in a gelatinous matrix (Liew et al. 2000; Hongsanan et al. 2020). This type of pseudoparaphyses is found in Aquilariomyces (Fig. 3I). Trabeculae were considered important at the Dothideomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka in earlier classifications; thus, Melanommatales was defined as having trabeculae (Barr 1983). However, Liew et al. (2000) showed that trabeculae were not important at the order level and probably were important at the family level (or even species). Thyridariaceae comprises nine genera: Aquilariomyces, Chromolaenomyces Mapook & K.D. Hyde, Cycasicola Wanas., E.B.G. Jones & K.D. Hyde, Liua Phookamsak & K.D. Hyde, Parathyridaria Jaklitsch & Voglmayr, Parathyridariella Prigione, A. Poli, E. Bovio & Varese, Pseudothyridariella Mapook & K.D. Hyde, Thyridaria Sacc., and Thyridariella Devadatha, V.V. Sarma, K.D. Hyde, Wanas. & E.B.G. Jones (Wijayawardene et al. 2022; Du et al. 2024b). Among these genera, Aquilariomyces (Du et al. 2024b), Parathyridaria (Jaklitsch and Voglmayr 2016), and Thyridaria (Jaklitsch and Voglmayr 2016) have trabeculate pseudoparaphyses; Chromolaenomyces (Mapook et al. 2020), Pseudothyridariella (Mapook et al. 2020), and Thyridariella (Devadatha et al. 2018) have cellular pseudoparaphyses, while pseudoparaphyses of this type have not been reported yet in other genera, viz. Cycasicola, Liua, and Parathyridariella. We believe pseudoparaphyses type is one of the important characters at the genus level.

The base pair differences in the LSU, ITS, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 genes (without gaps) between our new collection and Aq. aquilariae (ZHKUCC 23-0072, ex-type) were also compared. The results showed that there are 3.1% nucleotide differences (28/912 bp) in LSU; in comparison, ITS has 12.3% nucleotide differences (67/544 bp), SSU has 0.3% nucleotide differences (3/873 bp), tef1-α has 7.5% nucleotide differences (76/1008 bp), and rpb2 has 10.6% nucleotide differences (109/1025 bp). These comparisons indicate minor differences in SSU and LSU, while there are considerable base differences in ITS, tef1-α, and rpb2. Therefore, we introduce our new collection as a new species, Aq. maomingensis, based on a polyphasic approach, according to the guidelines of Maharachchikumbura et al. (2021). Aquilariomyces maomingensis, the second Aquilariomyces species, was collected from the same host genus and country (Aquilaria sinensis, China) as the first.

Pleosporales genera incertae sedis

Mangifericomes E.F. Yang & Tibpromma, 2022

Notes

Mangifericomes was established by Yang et al. (2022) as a monotypic genus in the Pleosporales genera incertae sedis to accommodate M. hongheensis E.F. Yang and Tibpromma as type species, which was isolated from Mangifera indica L. in China. Mangifericomes is characterized by immersed or semi-immersed, globose to subglobose, dark brown to black ascomata with or without ostioles; a hamathecium comprising filiform, hyaline, septate, branched cellular pseudoparaphyses (sensu Liew et al. 2000); 8-spored, bitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, pedicellate asci; and ellipsoid, muriform, pale brown to brown ascospores, wrapped in a gelatinous sheath (Yang et al. 2022). The updated phylogenetic tree of Mangifericomes is shown in Fig. 5.

Figure 5. 

Phylogram generated from ML analysis of Pleosporales based on combined LSU, ITS, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 sequence data of 159 taxa, which comprised 4584 base pairs of LSU = 1201, ITS = 534, SSU = 1018, rpb2 = 930, tef1-α = 901. The best-scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of -91408.743991 is presented. The matrix had 3121 distinct alignment patterns, with 41.32% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.246701, C = 0.244302, G = 0.274425, T = 0.234571; substitution rates: AC = 1.391138, AG = 3.919388, AT = 1.582417, CG = 1.094328, CT = 7.887132, GT = 1.0; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.418663. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (ML) equal to or greater than 70% and clade credibility values greater than 0.90 from Bayesian inference analysis are labelled at each node. The tree is rooted with Orbilia auricolor (AFTOL-ID 906) and O. vinosa (AFTOL-ID 905). The new isolates are indicated in red, and the ex-type strains are in bold.

Mangifericomes aquilariae T.Y. Du, K.D. Hyde, Tibpromma & Karun., sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 856410
Fig. 6

Etymology

Named after the host genus “Aquilaria,” from which the holotype was collected.

Holotype

GMB-W 1008.

Description

Saprobic on decaying branch of Aquilaria sp. Sexual morph: Ascomata 280–460 μm high × 250–510 μm diam. (x̄ = 375 × 380 μm, n = 10), globose to subglobose, brown to dark brown, gregarious, immersed, inconspicuous on host surface, ostiolate. Peridium 20–70 μm (x̄ = 40 μm, n = 20) wide, comprising 5–7 layers of hyaline to pale brown cells of textura angularis to textura prismatica, fusing with the host tissue. Hamathecium 2.5 μm wide, hyaline, fascicular, septate, branched, numerous, cellular pseudoparaphyses, embedded in a glutinous matrix. Asci 170–265 × 32–50 μm (x̄ = 216 × 40 μm, n = 30), bitunicate, fissitunicate, 8-spored, cylindric-clavate, with short pedicel, apically rounded, with an ocular chamber. Asco­spores 40–53 × 18–23 μm (x̄ = 47 × 20 μm, n = 30), muriform, uniseriate, hyaline and later become golden yellow, pale brown to dark brown, ellipsoid, slightly curved to straight, rough-walled, slightly wider near apex, apically rounded, 10–13-transversally septate, and 3–6-longitudinal septa, slightly constricted at the septum, surrounded by a 6.5–15 µm wide gelatinous sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Figure 6. 

Mangifericomes aquilariae (GMB-W 1008, holotype) A, B ascomata on the host (the arrow indicates the cross-section of the ascomata) C vertical sections through the ascomata D peridium E, K cellular pseudoparaphyses (E stained with cotton blue) F ocular chamber of asci G–J asci L–R ascospores (the arrows indicate the sheath of the ascospores) S germinated ascospore T, U colony on PDA obverse and reverse views. Scale bars: 200 µm (C); 20 µm (D, G, L–S); 10 µm (E, K); 100 µm (F, H–J).

Culture characteristics

Ascospores germinated on PDA after 24 hours, and germ tubes were produced from each cell. Colonies on PDA reaching 5 cm diam., after four weeks at 23–28 °C. Colonies obverse: loose, circular or irregular, white-cream, slightly raised at the center, filamentous edge. Colonies reverse reddish-brown at the center and cream to light yellow towards the periphery.

Material examined

China • Yunnan Province, Nujiang Prefecture, Lushui City, Liuku Town, 25°48'30"N, 98°51'5"E, on a dead branch of Aquilaria sp. (Thymelaeaceae), 21 April 2023, T.Y. Du, NJT41 (GMB-W 1008, holotype), ex-type living culture, GMBCC1010; additional living culture, GZCC 23-0628.

GenBank numbers

GMBCC1010: ITS = PQ604645, LSU = PQ604622, tef1-α = PQ612417, rpb2 = PQ612421; GZCC 23-0628: ITS = PQ604646, LSU = PQ604623, tef1-α = PQ612418, rpb2 = PQ612422.

Notes

In the present phylogenetic analyses, our new collection, Mangifericomes aquilariae, formed a well-separated sister lineage to M. hongheensis (KUMCC 21-0342 and KUMUCC 21-0345) with 100% ML and 1.00 BYPP statistical support (Fig. 5). Mangifericomes aquilariae shares similar morphological characteristics with M. hongheensis (HKAS 1221888, holotype) in having globose to subglobose, brown to dark brown, ostiolate ascomata, bitunicate asci with fissitunicate, 8-spored, cylindrical-clavate, and muriform ascospores, ellipsoid, pale brown to dark brown, slightly wider near the apex, surrounded by a gelatinous sheath (Yang et al. 2022). However, M. aquilariae (GMB-W 1008) differs from M. hongheensis (HKAS 1221888) by its immersed ascomata, peridium comprising textura prismatica to textura angularis cells, fascicular, and numerous pseudoparaphyses, and ascospores that are 10–13-transversally septate, 3–6-longitudinal septa, while ascomata of M. hongheensis (HKAS 1221888) are semi-immersed to fully immersed, peridium comprising textura angularis to textura globosa cells, sparse pseudoparaphyses, and ascospores that are 7–11-transversally septate, 5–8-longitudinal septa (Yang et al. 2022). In addition, the base pair differences of the LSU, ITS, tef1-α, and rpb2 genes (without gaps) between our new collection and M. hongheensis (KUMCC 21-0342, ex-type) were compared, while the SSU of our new collection is not available. The results showed that there are 0.8% nucleotide differences (7/864 bp) in LSU, while ITS has 3.4% nucleotide differences (18/533 bp), tef1-α has 3.2% nucleotide differences (31/962 bp), and rpb2 has 4.5% nucleotide differences (41/905 bp). These comparisons indicate that they display minor differences on LSU while displaying significant base differences on ITS, tef1-α, and rpb2. Therefore, we introduce our new collection (from Aquilaria sp. in China) as a new species, M. aquilariae, based on a polyphasic approach according to the guidelines of Maharachchikumbura et al. (2021). In addition, this study introduces the second Mangifericomes species in the genus and the first Mangifericomes species collected from Aquilaria.

Discussion

Aquilaria, the primary genus that produces agarwood, is a plant of significant medicinal and economic value, with 13 species known to produce agarwood (Hashim et al. 2016). As Table 1 and Fig. 1 show, saprobic fungi associated with Aquilaria mainly belong to Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka of Ascomycota, with only one taxon reported in Mucoromycetes Doweld of Mucoromycota Doweld. This is also consistent in both endophytic and pathogenic fungi of Aquilaria spp. (Du et al. 2022a,b). The currently recorded distribution range of these saprobic fungi is mainly in China (28 records, including this study), Thailand (seven records), and only one record in Bangladesh. This is mainly because Aquilaria is a tropical tree genus, mainly distributed in tropical regions. Among these records, eight species (Cercosporella sp., Chaetomium spirale, Cladosporium sp., Phialogeniculata sp., Phomopsis aquilariae, Pithomyces sp., Rhizopus sp., and Trichoderma sp.) lack molecular data and detailed morphological descriptions. It is necessary to explore saprobic fungi associated with Aquilaria spp. with more collections in broader geographical regions.

A thorough investigation and systematic sampling in this study resulted in the authentication of two new species of saprobic fungi on Aquilaria from China: Aquilariomyces maomingensis on Aquilaria sinensis from Maoming City, Guangdong Province in June 2022, and Mangifericomes aquilariae on Aquilaria sp. from Nujiang, Yunnan Province in April 2023. In the genus Aquilariomyces, Aq. aquilariae was collected from Aquilaria yunnanensis in Yunnan Province (Du et al. 2024b). In this study, Aq. maomingensis is introduced as the second species in Aquilariomyces, which was collected from Aquilaria sinensis in Guangdong Province. These two species come from Aquilaria trees in tropical regions. This data may indicate that this genus exhibits host-specificity. However, only two species have been discovered in this genus, which is insufficient to confirm this feature, and this needs more research.

This study provides a phylogenetic tree (Fig. 5) of Pleosporales to determine the position of Mangifericomes. After multiple constructions of multi-gene phylogenetic trees, we found that the placement of Mangifericomes is highly unstable and has low statistical support with other branches. Therefore, we still classify it as a Pleosporales genus incertae sedis (Wijayawardene et al. 2022), and more samples of the genus need to be collected to determine the taxonomic placement. Mangifericomes aquilariae is morphologically consistent with the monotypic genus introduced by Yang et al. (2022) and also forms a distinguishable sister branch with the type species M. hongheensis in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 5). Mangifericomes aquilariae differs from M. hongheensis in morphology and significant differences in the comparison of basepair fragments (Jeewon and Hyde 2016). Mangifericomes hongheensis was found on Mangifera indica in Honghe, Yunnan Province, while M. aquilariae was found on Aquilaria sp. in Nujiang, Yunnan Province. Currently, both species have been isolated from broad-leaved tree species in tropical regions of China. Further research is needed to explore whether the distribution range of this genus is related to tropical plants.

Most members of Ascomycota are saprobes; the phylum is one of the most representative fungal communities involved in saprobic behavior (Benny et al. 2001; Li et al. 2022). The abundance of Ascomycota is higher in tropical forests than in other forest ecosystems (Tedersoo et al. 2014; Li et al. 2022; Hyde et al. 2024b). In order to more systematically fill the gap where only a few saprophytic fungi have been found in Aquilaria, in this study, we introduce two new terrestrial saprobic fungal species belonging to the Pleosporales in Ascomycota, which enrich the diversity of saprobic fungi on Aquilaria. For the first time, this study lists a comprehensive set of saprobic fungi associated with Aquilaria spp., laying a solid foundation for future research on taxa associated with Aquilaria.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the High-Level Talent Recruitment Plan of Yunnan Province (“High-End Foreign Experts” Program and “Young Talents” Program) and the Yunnan Provincial Department of Science and Technology “Zhihui Yunnan”plan (202403AM140023). Tian-Ye Du extends her heartfelt gratitude to Mae Fah Luang University for granting a tuition-fee scholarship for her Ph.D. study. Shaun Pennycook is thanked for his assistance in selecting species epithets for the new species. The authors also extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2025R56), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

The Special Basic Cooperative Research Innovation Programs of Qujing Science and Technology Bureau & Qujing Normal University (Grant No. KJLH2022YB03), the Special Basic Cooperative Research Programs of Yunnan Provincial Undergraduate Universities (Grant No. 202101BA070001-209, 202101BA070001-279), the Yunnan Fundamental Research projects [Grant No. 202201AU070017], Mee-mann Chang Academician Workstation in Yunnan Province (Grant No. 202205AF150002), Yunnan Province Young and Middle-aged Academic and Technical Leaders Reserve Talents Program (Grant No.202305AC350252), General Programs of the Provincial Department of Science and Technology (Grant No. 202101BA070001-076), and Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2025R56), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: SCK, ST. Data curation: TYD. Formal analysis: SCK. Funding acquisition: DQD, ST, HHW. Investigation: SCK, ST, TYD. Methodology: SCK, ST, LSH, TYD. Project administration: ST, DQD, HHW. Resources: TYD. Software: TYD. Validation: SCK, SN, ST, KCR, KDH. Visualization: TYD. Writing—original draft: TYD. Writing—review and editing: SN, KDH, AM, LSH, AME, KCR, SCK, ST, TYD, DQD, HHW.

Author ORCIDs

Tian-Ye Du https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2105-1803

Samantha C. Karunarathna https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7080-0781

Kevin D. Hyde https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-0762

Somrudee Nilthong https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-5826

Ausana Mapook https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7929-2429

Dong-Qin Dai https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8935-8807

Kunhiraman C. Rajeshkumar https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0401-8294

Abdallah M. Elgorban https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3664-7853

Li-Su Han https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5380-9928

Hao-Han Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2128-7894

Saowaluck Tibpromma https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4706-6547

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Azren PD, Lee SY, Emang D, Mohamed R (2018) History and perspectives of induction technology for agarwood production from cultivated Aquilaria in Asia: A review. Journal of Forestry Research 30(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0627-4
  • Barr ME (1983) Muriform ascospores in class ascomycetes. Mycotaxon 18: 149–157.
  • Borah RK, Ahmed FS, Sarmah GS, Gogoi B (2012) A new record of leaf spot disease on Aquilaria malaccensis Lamk. India. Asian Journal of Plant Pathology 6(2): 48–51. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajppaj.2012.48.51
  • Chen XY, Liu YY, Yang Y, Feng J, Liu PW, Sui C, Wei JH (2018) Trunk surface agarwood-inducing technique with Rigidoporus vinctus: An efficient novel method for agarwood production. PLoS ONE 13(6): e0198111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198111
  • Chethana KWT, Rathnayaka AR, Samarakoon BC, Wu N, Wijesinghe SN, Yasanthika WAE, Sysouphanthong P, Thiyagaraja V, Armand A, Lestari AS, Madagammana AD, Ediriweera AN, Prematunga C, Li CJ-Y, Tennakoon DS, Gomdola D, Marasinghe DS, Bundhun D, Pem D, Ren G, Zhao H, Su HL, Win H, Li H, Lu L, Calabon MS, Samarakoon MC, Chaiwan N, Huanraluek N, Samaradiwakara NP, Kularathnage ND, Abeywickrama PD, Perera RH, Tang SM, Du T-Y, Punyaboon W, Ma X, Yang YH, Tun ZL, Bhunjun CS, Manawasinghe IS, Senanayake IC, Liu J-K, Tibpromma S, Wadduwage KS, Wijayalath WHDN, Raspé O, Bulgakov TS, Camporesi E, Promputtha I, Hyde KD (2023) AJOM new records and collections of fungi: 151–200. Asian Journal of Mycology 6: 89–243. https://doi.org/10.5943/ajom/3/1/3
  • Devadatha B, Sarma VV, Jeewon R, Wanasinghe DN, Hyde KD, Jones EBG (2018) Thyridariella, a novel marine fungal genus from India: Morphological characterization and phylogeny inferred from multigene DNA sequence analyses. Mycological Progress 17(7): 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-018-1387-4
  • Dissanayake AJ, Bhunjun CS, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Liu JK (2020) Applied aspects of methods to infer phylogenetic relationships amongst fungi. Mycosphere 11(1): 2652–2676. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/18
  • Du TY, Dao CJ, Mapook A, Stephenson SL, Elgorban AM, Al‐Rejaie S, Suwannarach N, Karunarathna SC, Tibpromma S (2022a) Diversity and biosynthetic activities of agarwood associated fungi. Diversity 14(3): 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030211
  • Du TY, Karunarathna SC, Hyde KD, Mapook A, Wariss HM, Aluthwattha ST, Wang YH, Mortimer PE, Xu JC, Tibpromma S (2022b) The endophytic fungi of Aquilaria sinensis from southern China. Fungal Biotec 2: 1–15.
  • Du TY, Karunarathna SC, Zhang X, Dai DQ, Gao Y, Mapook A, Tibpromma S (2022c) Morphology and multigene phylogeny revealed Peroneutypa aquilariae sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) from Aquilaria sinensis in Yunnan Province. China Studies in Fungi 7(1): 18. https://doi.org/10.48130/SIF-2022-0018
  • Du TY, Dai DQ, Mapook A, Lu L, Stephenson SL, Suwannarach N, Elgorban AM, Al-Rejaie S, Karunarathna SC, Tibpromma S (2023) Additions to Rhytidhysteron (Hysteriales, Dothideomycetes) in China. Journal of Fungi (Basel, Switzerland) 9(2): 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020148
  • Du TY, Karunarathna SC, Tibpromma S, Hyde KD, Nilthong S, Mapook A, Liu XF, Dai DQ, Niu C, Elgorban AM, Chukeatirote E, Wang HH (2024a) Melomastia (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) species associated with Chinese Aquilaria spp. MycoKeys 111: 65–86. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.111.137898
  • Du TY, Tibpromma S, Hyde KD, Mapook A, Dai DQ, Zhang GQ, Stephenson SL, Suwannarach N, Kumla J, Elgorban AM, Rajeshkumar KC, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Li Q, Karunarathna SC (2024b) The polyphasic approach reveals 10 novel and one known Ascomycota taxa from terrestrial agarwood‐producing trees. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.13037
  • Glez‐Peña D, Gómez‐Blanco D, Reboiro‐Jato M, Fdez‐Riverola F, Posada D (2010) ALTER, program‐oriented conversion of DNA and protein alignments. Nucleic Acids Research 38: W14–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq321
  • Hashim YZHY, Kerr PG, Abbas P, Salleh HM (2016) Aquilaria spp. (agarwood) as source of health beneficial compounds: A review of traditional use, phytochemistry and pharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 189: 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.06.055
  • Hongsanan S, Hyde KD, Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe DN, McKenzie EHC, Sarma VV, Boonmee S, Lücking R, Pem D, Bhat JD, Liu N, Tennakoon DS, Karunarathna A, Jiang SH, Jones EBG, Phillips AJL, Manawasinghe I, Tibpromma S, Jayasiri SC, Sandamali D, Jayawardena RS, Wijayawardene NN, Ekanayaka AH, Jeewon R, Lu YZ, Dissanayake AJ, Zeng XY, Luo ZL, Tian Q, Phukhamsakda C, Thambugala KM, Dai DQ, Chethana TKW, Ertz D, Doilom M, Liu JK, Pérez-Ortega S, Suija A, Senwanna C, Wijesinghe SN, Konta S, Niranjan M, Zhang SN, Ariyawansa HA, Jiang HB, Zhang JF, de Silva NI, Thiyagaraja V, Zhang H, Bezerra JDP, Miranda-Gonzáles R, Aptroot A, Kashiwadani H, Harishchandra D, Abeywickrama PD, Bao DF, Devadatha B, Wu HX, Moon KH, Gueidan C, Schumm F, Bundhun D, Mapook A, Monkai J, Chomnunti P, Samarakoon MC, Suetrong S, Chaiwan N, Dayarathne MC, Jing Y, Rathnayaka AR, Bhunjun CS, Xu JC, Zheng JS, Liu G, Feng Y, Xie N (2020) Refined families of Dothideomycetes: Orders and families incertae sedis in Dothideomycetes. Fungal Diversity 105(1): 17–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-020-00462-6
  • Hyde KD, Norphanphoun C, Ma J, Yang HD, Zhang JY, Du TY, Gao Y, Gomes de Farias AR, He SC, He YK, Li CJY, Li JY, Liu XF, Lu L, Su HL, Tang X, Tian XG, Wang SY, Wei DP, Xu RF, Xu RJ, Yang YY, Zhang F, Zhang Q, Bahkali AH, Boonmee S, Chethana KWT, Jayawardena RS, Lu YZ, Karunarathna SC, Tibpromma S, Wang Y, Zhao Q (2023) Mycosphere notes 387–412 – novel species of fungal taxa from around the world. Mycosphere 14(1): 663–744. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/14/1/8
  • Hyde KD, Baldrian P, Chen Y, Chethana KWT, de Hoog S, Doilom M, de Farias AR, Goncalves MF, Gonkhom D, Gui H, Hilário S (2024a) Current trends, limitations and future research in the fungi. Fungal Diversity 125(1): 1–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-023-00532-5
  • Hyde KD, Noorabadi MT, Thiyagaraja V, He MQ, Johnston PR, Wijesinghe SN, Armand A, Biketova AY, Chethana KWT, Erdoğdu M, Ge ZW, Groenewald JZ, Hongsanan S, Kušan I, Leontyev DV, Li DW, Lin CG, Liu NG, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Matočec N, May TW, McKenzie EHC, Mešić A, Perera RH, Phukhamsakda C, Piątek M, Samarakoon MC, Selcuk F, Senanayake IC, Tanney JB, Tian Q, Vizzini A, Wanasinghe DN, Wannasawang N, Wijayawardene NN, Zhao RL, Abdel-Wahab MA, Abdollahzadeh J et al. (2024b) The 2024 Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 15(1): 5146–6239. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/25
  • Hyde KD, Wijesinghe SN, Afshari N, Aumentado HD, Bhunjun CS, Boonmee S, Camporesi E, Chethana KWT, Doilom M, Du TY, Farias ARG, Gao Y, Jayawardena RS, Karimi O, Karunarathna SC, Kularathnage ND, Lestari AS, Li CJY, Li YX, Liao CF, Liu XF, Lu L, Lu YZ, Luo ZL, Ma J, Mamarabadi M, Manawasinghe IS, Mapook A, Mi LX, Niranjan M, Senanayake IC, Shen HW, Su HL, Tibpromma S, Xu RJ, Yan JY, Yang YH, Yang YY, Yu FQ, Kang JC, Zhang JY (2024c) Mycosphere Notes 469–520. Mycosphere 15(1): 1294–1454. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/11
  • Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Ariyawansa HA, Bhat J, Buyck B, Cai L, Dai YC, Abd‐Elsalam KA, Ertz D, Hidayat I, Jeewon R, Jones EBG, Bahkali AH, Karunarathna SC, Liu JK, Luangsa‐ard JJ, Lumbsch HT, Maharachchikumbura SSN, McKenzie EHC, Moncalvo JM, Ghobad‐Nejhad M, Nilsson H, Pang KL, Pereira OL, Phillips AJL, Raspé O, Rollins AW, Romero AI, Etayo J, Selçuk F, Stephenson SL, Suetrong S, Taylor JE, Tsui CKM, Vizzini A, Abdel‐Wahab MA, Wen TC, Boonmee S, Dai DQ, Daranagama DA, Dissanayake AJ, Ekanayaka AH, Fryar SC, Hongsanan S, Jayawardena RS, Li WJ, Perera RH, Phookamsak R, de Silva NI, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Wijayawardene NN, Zhao RL, Zhao Q, Kang JC, Promputtha I (2015) The Faces of fungi database: Fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts. Fungal Diversity 74(1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0351-8
  • Jeewon R, Hyde KD (2016) Establishing species boundaries and new taxa among fungi: Recommendations to resolve taxonomic ambiguities. Mycosphere 7(11): 1669–1677. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/7/11/4
  • Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones‐Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 28(12): 1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
  • Laurence WVA (2013) Isolation and Characterization of Endophytes Isolated from Akar Gaharu. Bachelor’s Research Dissertation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia.
  • Lee SY, Mohamed R (2016) The origin and domestication of Aquilaria, an important agarwood-producing genus. In: Mohamed R (Ed.) Chapter 1. Agarwood. Tropical Forestry. Springer, Berlin, Singapore, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0833-7_1
  • Li W, Chen HQ, Wang H, Mei WL, Dai HF (2021) Natural products in agarwood and Aquilaria plants: Chemistry, biological activities and biosynthesis. Natural Product Reports 38(3): 528–565. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NP00042F
  • Li X, Qu Z, Zhang Y, Ge Y, Sun H (2022) Soil fungal community and potential function in different forest ecosystems. Diversity 14(7): 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14070520
  • Liao W, Zou D, Huang H, Luo J, Zhao C, Wu Y (2018) Isolation and identification for pathogen of anthracnose in Aquilaria sinensis (Lour.) Gilg. Nanfang Nongye Xuebao 49: 74–78.
  • Liew ECY, Aptroot A, Hyde KD (2000) Phylogenetic significance of the pseudoparaphyses in Loculoascomycete taxonomy. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16(3): 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2000.0801
  • Liu YY, Chen HQ, Yang Y, Zhang Z, Wei J, Meng H, Chen WP, Feng JD, Gan BC, Chen XY, Gao ZH, Huang JQ, Chen B, Chen HJ (2013) Whole-tree agarwood-inducing technique: An efficient novel technique for producing high-quality agarwood in cultivated Aquilaria sinensis trees. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 18(3): 3086–3106. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18033086
  • Maharachchikumbura SSN, Chen Y, Ariyawansa HA, Hyde KD, Haelewaters D, Perera RH, Samarakoon MC, Wanasinghe DN, Bustamante DE, Liu J, Lawrence DP, Cheewangkoon R, Stadler M (2021) Integrative approaches for species delimitation in Ascomycota. Fungal Diversity 109(1): 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-021-00486-6
  • Manawasinghe IS, Hyde KD, Wanasinghe DN, Karunarathna SC, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Samarakoon MC, Voglmayr H, Pang KL, Chiang MWL, Jones EBG, Saxena RK, Kumar A, Rajeshkumar KC, Selbmann L, Coleine C, Hu Y, Ainsworth AM, Liimatainen K, Niskanen T, Ralaiveloarisoa A, Arumugam E, Kezo K, Kaliyaperumal M, Gunaseelan S, Dissanayake AJ, Khalid AN, Gajanayake AJ, Flakus A, Armand A, Aptroot A, Rodrigues A, Tsurykau A, López-Villalba Á, de Farias ARG, Sánchez A, Góes-Neto A, Goto BT, de Souza CAF, Chuaseeharonnachai C, Lin CG, Li C, Denchev CM, Guerra-Mateo D, Tennakoon DS, Wei D-P, Begerow D, Alves E, Drechsler-Santos ER, Sousa ES, de Medeiros EV, Langer E, Zhang F, de Souza FA, Magurno F, Barreto GG, Moreno G, Mane G, Alves-Silva G, da Silva GA, Xia G, Shen H-W, Gui H, Senanayake IC, Luangsa-ard JJ, Liu JW, Liu JK, Ma J, Lin JY, Beserra Jr JEA, Cano-Lira JF, Gené J, Harikrishnan K, Lu L, dos Santos LA, Xu L, Lacerda LT, Gusmão LFP, Cáceres MES, Câmara MPS, de Barros-Barreto MBB, Calabon MS, Kukwa M, Kemler M, de Melo MP, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Luo M, Ding M, Doilom M, Phonemany M, Usman M, Thongklang N, Boonyuen N, Ashtekar N, Kularathnage ND, Sruthi OP, Kwantong P, Ansil PA, Kooij PW, Zhao Q, Alfenas RF, de Oliveira RJV, Singh R, da Silva RMF, Avchar R, Morey R, Sharma R, Xu RJ, da Silveira RMB, Xu RF, Jayawardena RS, Nanu S, Nuankaew S, Tibpromma S, Boonmie S, Somrithipol S, Varghese S, Moreira SI, Rajwar S, He SC, Kumar TKA, Denchev TT, Luangharn T, de Oliveira TGL, Du TY, Wen TC, Du T, Wu T, Sri-Indrasutdhi V, Doyle VP, Baulin V, Dong W, Li WL, Lu WH, Tian W, dos Vieira WA, von Brackel W, Yu XD, Zhang X, Liu XF, Peng XC, Chen Y, Yang Y, Gao Y, Xiong Y, Shu Y, Lu YZ, Shen YM, Zhou Y, Zhang YX, Zhang W, Luo ZL, Madushani MA, Cheewangkoon R, Song JG, Xu B (2024) Fungal diversity notes 1818–1918: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi. Fungal Diversity 1–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-024-00541-y
  • Mapook A, Hyde KD, McKenzie EHC, Jones EBG, Bhat DJ, Jeewon R, Stadler M, Samarakoon MC, Malaithong M, Tanunchai B, Buscot F, Wubet T, Purahong W (2020) Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungi associated with the invasive weed Chromolaena odorata (Siam weed). Fungal Diversity 101(1): 175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-020-00444-8
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). IEEE Computer Society, New Orleans, LA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • National Pharmacopoeia Committee (2020) Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China 2020 Version. Beijing. Chinese Medical Science and Technology Press 1: 192–193.
  • Niego AGT, Lambert C, Mortimer P, Thongklang N, Rapior S, Grosse M, Schrey H, Charria-Girón E, Walker A, Hyde KD, Stadler M (2023a) The contribution of fungi to the global economy. Fungal Diversity 121(1): 95–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-023-00520-9
  • Niego AGT, Rapior S, Thongklang N, Raspé O, Hyde KD, Mortimer P (2023b) Reviewing the contributions of macrofungi to forest ecosystem processes and services. Fungal Biology Reviews 44: 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2022.11.002
  • Nizamani MM, Zhang Q, Zhang HL, Wang Y (2023) Checklist of the fungi associated with the rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis). Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 13(1): 439–488. https://doi.org/10.5943/cream/13/1/17
  • Nylander JA, Wilgenbusch JC, Warren DL, Swofford DL (2008) AWTY (are we there yet?): A system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 24(4): 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm388
  • Punithalingam E, Gibson IAS (1978) Phomopsis species from Aquilaria agallocha. Nova Hedwigia 29: 251–255.
  • Rambaut A (2012) FigTree version 1. 4. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
  • Rathnayaka AR, Tennakoon DS, Jones GE, Wanasinghe DN, Bhat DJ, Priyashantha AKH, Stephenson SL, Tibpromma S, Karunarathna SC (2024) Significance of precise documentation of hosts and geospatial data of fungal collections, with an emphasis on plant-associated fungi. New Zealand Journal of Botany: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2024.2381734
  • Rehner S (2001) Primers for elongation Factor 1‐Alpha (EF1‐Alpha). Insect Biocontrol Laboratory, USDA, ARS, PSI, Beltsville, MD.
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Senanayake IC, Rathnayaka AR, Marasinghe DS, Calabon MS, Gentekaki E, Lee HB, Hurdeal VG, Pem D, Dissanayake LS, Wijesinghe SN, Bundhun D, Nguyen TT, Goonasekara ID, Abeywickrama PD, Bhunjun CS, Jayawardena RS, Wanasinghe DN, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, Xiang MM (2020) Morphological approaches in studying fungi, collection examination isolation sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 11(1): 2678–2754. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20
  • Senwanna C, Mapook A, Samarakoon MC, Karunarathna A, Wang Y, Tang AMC, Haituk S, Suwannarach N, Hyde KD, Cheewangkoon R (2021) Ascomycetes on Para rubber (Hevea brasiliensis). Mycosphere 12(1): 1334–1512. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/18
  • Šnajdr J, Dobiášová P, Větrovský T, Valášková V, Alawi A, Boddy L, Baldrian P (2011) Saprotrophic basidiomycete mycelia and their interspecific interactions affect the spatial distribution of extracellular enzymes in soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 78(1): 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01123.x
  • Subasinghe SMCUP, Hitihamu HID, Fernando KMEP (2019) Use of two fungal species to induce agarwood resin formation in Gyrinops walla. Journal of Forestry Research 30(2): 721–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0654-1
  • Tao QG, Du TY, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Tian XG (2024) A new record of Melomastia clematidis associated with Aquilaria sp. from Yunnan, China. MycoKing 3(2): 1–14.
  • Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Põlme S, Kõljalg U, Yorou NS, Wijesundera R, Ruiz LV, Vasco-Palacios AM, Thu PQ, Suija A, Smith ME, Sharp C, Saluveer E, Saitta A, Rosas M, Riit T, Ratkowsky D, Pritsch K, Põldmaa K, Piepenbring M, Phosri C, Peterson M, Parts K, Pärte K, Otsing E, Nouhra E, Njouonkou AL, Nilsson RH, Morgado LN, Mayor J, May TW, Majuakim L, Lodge DJ, Lee SS, Larsson K-H, Kohout P, Hosaka K, Hiiesalu I, Henkel TW, Harend H, Guo L-D, Greslebin A, Grelet G, Geml J, Gates G, Dunstan W, Dunk C, Drenkhan R, Dearnaley J, Kesel AD, Dang T, Chen X, Buegger F, Brearley FQ, Bonito G, Anslan S, Abell S, Abarenkov K (2014) Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346(6213): 1256688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256688
  • Tian XG, Bao DF, Karunarathna SC, Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, Bhat DJ, Luo ZL, Elgorban AM, Hongsanan S, Rajeshkumar KC, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Suwannarach N, Dawoud TM, Lu YZ, Han JJ, Xiao YP, Du TY, Lu L, Xu RF, Dai DQ, Liu XF, Liu C, Tibpromma S (2024) Taxonomy and phylogeny of ascomycetes associated with selected economically important monocotyledons in China and Thailand. Mycosphere 15(1): 1–274. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/1
  • Tibpromma S, Hyde KD, McKenzie EHC, Bhat JD, Phillips AJL, Wanasinghe DN, Samarakoon MC, Jayawardena RS, Dissanayake AJ, Tennakoon DS, Doilom M, Phookamsak R, Tang AMC, Xu JC, Mortimer PE, Promputtha I, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Khan S, Karunarathna SC (2018) Fungal Diversity notes 840–928: Micro-fungi associated with Pandanaceae. Fungal Diversity 93(1): 1–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0408-6
  • Tibpromma S, Zhang L, Karunarathna SC, Du TY, Phukhamsakda C, Rachakunta M, Suwannarach N, Xu JC, Mortimer PE, Wang YH (2021) Volatile constituents of endophytic fungi isolated from Aquilaria sinensis with descriptions of two new species of Nemania. Life (Basel, Switzerland) 11(4): 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040363
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172(8): 4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
  • Wang S, Yu Z, Wang C, Wu C, Guo P, Wei J (2018) Chemical constituents and pharmacological activity of agarwood and Aquilaria plants. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 23(2): 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020342
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SJWT, Taylor JL (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (Eds) PCR protocols, a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
  • Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Dai DQ, Sánchez-García M, Goto BT, Saxena RK, Erdoğdu M, Selçuk F, Rajeshkumar KC, Aptroot A, Błaszkowski J, Boonyuen N, da Silva GA, de Souza FA, Dong W, Ertz D, Haelewaters D, Jones EBG, Karunarathna SC, Kirk PM, Kukwa M, Kumla J, Leontyev DV, Lumbsch HT, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Marguno F, Martínez-Rodríguez P, Mešić A, Monteiro JS, Oehl F, Pawłowska J, Pem D, Pfliegler WP, Phillips AJL, Pošta A, He MQ, Li JX, Raza M, Sruthi OP, Suetrong S, Suwannarach N, Tedersoo L, Thiyagaraja V, Tibpromma S, Tkalčec Z, Tokarev YS, Wanasinghe DN, Wijesundara DSA, Wimalaseana SDMK, Madrid H, Zhang GQ, Gao Y, Sánchez-Castro I, Tang LZ, Stadler M, Yurkov A, Thines M (2022) Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa – 2021. Mycosphere 13(1): 53–453. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/2
  • Xu YH, Liao YC, Zhang Z, Liu J, Sun PW, Gao ZH, Sui C, Wei JH (2016) Jasmonic acid is a crucial signal transducer in heat shock induced sesquiterpene formation in Aquilaria sinensis. Scientific Reports 6(1): 21843. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21843
  • Xu RF, Karunarathna SC, Phukhamsakda C, Dai DQ, Elgorban AM, Suwannarach N, Kumla J, Wang XY, Tibpromma S (2024) Four new species of Dothideomycetes (Ascomycota) from Pará Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in Yunnan Province, China. MycoKeys 103: 71–95. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.103.117580
  • Yang EF, Karunarathna SC, Dai DQ, Stephenson SL, Elgorban AM, Al-Rejaie S, Xiong XR, Promputtha I, Samarakoon MC, Tibpromma S (2022) Taxonomy and phylogeny of fungi associated with Mangifera indica from Yunnan, China. Journal of Fungi (Basel, Switzerland) 8(12): 1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8121249
  • Zhang Y, Du TY, Han LS, Tao QG, Tian XG (2024) A new host record of Allocryptovalsa castaneae (Diatrypaceae) in Aquilaria from China. MycoKing 3(3): 1–15.
login to comment