Research Article
Print
Research Article
Morpho-molecular analysis of two new species Deconica and Entocybe in Agaricales from Mount Tianmu, China
expand article infoYu-Yu Shen, Zi-Wen Zhang, Wen-Qian Li, Xing-Ning Liu, Fei-Ying Tian, Chun-Mei Pang§, Wen-Hong Dai, Yao-Bin Song, Ming Dong|
‡ Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
§ Management Bureau of Mount Tianmu National Nature Reserve, Hangzhou, China
| Mianyang Normal University, Mianyang, China
Open Access

Abstract

Two new species of Agaricales, Deconica flavum and Entocybe roseoalbus, are described from Mount Tianmu, Zhejiang Province, Eastern China. Two new species are distinct and monophyletic based on morphology and phylogenetic analyses. Deconica flavum differs from other Deconica species in that the pileus is brow shallow in the center and stipe with yellowish white fibrils, scatted on litter under coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest at 1162 m. Entocybe roseoalbus is distinguished from other species of Entocybe by nearly blue pileus and pinkish-white stipe, scatted on humus in similar forest conditions at 1025 m. The differences are discussed between the two new taxa and their similar species morphologically, and related species phylogenetically.

Key words

Entolomataceae, Strophariaceae, taxonomy

Introduction

Agaricales is the largest order in the kingdom Fungi with nearly 20,000 species (Roskov et al. 2019). The members of the order play essential roles in the ecosystem as saprotrophs, ectomycorrhizae, lichens, and crops cultivated by termites and ants (Kalichman and Matheny 2020). Due to its great diversity, the order has been intensively studied worldwide (Kalichman and Matheny 2020).

The genus Deconica (W.G. Sm.) P. Karst. has been placed in the family Strophariaceae of Agaricales (Matheny et al. 2006; Ramírez-Cruz et al. 2013, 2020a) and was initially described as a subgenus of Agaricus (Smith 1870). It was subsequently raised to the genus level by Karsten (1879). But for the last several years species of Deconica were placed in the genus Psilocybe (Fr.) P. Kumm. because of the similarity in their morphology (Moncalvo et al. 2002; Noordeloos 2009). However, molecular studies have shown that the genus Deconica is phylogenetically distant from Psilocybe (Ramírez-Cruz et al. 2013). The genus Deconica is distinguished based on the absence of hallucinogenic compounds (Ramírez-Cruz et al. 2020b). The members of the genus Deconica have mycenoid, collybioid, crepidotoid, or omphaloid basidiomata occurring in/on the soil, grasses, mosses, rotten wood, trunks, and dung (Noordeloos 2009; Ramírez-Cruz et al. 2020b). Noordeloos (2011) mentioned that the genus Deconica has been divided into three sections namely, Deconica, Melanotus, and Merdariae based on characteristics of basidiomata, basidiospores, pileipellis, and cystidia. However, chrysocystidia have not been mentioned in most sections, except Deconica section (Singer 1986). Guzmán (2005) estimated around 133 species in the genus Deconica exist worldwide. However, He et al. (2019) and Kalichman and Matheny (2020) reported 44 and 45 taxa worldwide, respectively. Furthermore, Deconica was one of the largest genera with an unsequenced generic type (Kalichman and Matheny 2020).

Entocybe T. J. Baroni, Hofstetter & Largent is the genus placed in the family Entolomataceae within Agaricales (Baroni et al. 2011). Species of Entocybe were previously placed in section Turfosa, subgenus Entoloma of the genus Entoloma (Noordeloos 1992). The genus Entocybe was erected based on the morphological and molecular phylogeny-based data (Baroni et al. 2011). The basidiomata of Entocybe show slender tricholomatoid or mycenoid to collybioid habit and possess a relatively fragile, appressed fibrillose stipe (Baroni et al. 2011). The basidiospores of Entocybe are 6–10 angled in polar view with undulate-pustulate or rounded pustulate surface ornamentation, or ornamentation being composed of broken interconnected ridges with isolated pustules interspersed, which are similar to Rhodocybe (Baroni et al. 2011). Additionally, clamp connections are found on the hyphae in all tissues (Baroni and Lamoureux 2013). According to Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org), Entocybe currently comprises around ten species.

In the past decade, new species, combinations, and records of Deconica and Entocybe have been reported across the world (Baroni et al. 2011; Baroni and Lamoureux 2013; da Silva et al. 2013, 2014; Park et al. 2017; Ramírez-Cruz et al. 2020a, 2020b). In China, diverse macrofungal resources have been documented (Wu et al. 2019). However, there is limited research on Deconica and Entocybe. During the present study, specimens were collected from the National Nature Reserve of Mount Tianmu located in Zhejiang Province, China from July to September 2022. Two new species, Deconica flavum and Entocybe roseoalbus within Agaricales, are described and illustrated based on morphological and phylogenetic evidence.

Materials and methods

Morphological studies

Morphological observations encompassing the macro and microscopic structural characteristics were made from fresh and dried material. The color standards have been noted from the fresh samples as per Kornerup and Wanscher (1978). Microscopic characteristics were observed from dried material revived in 5% KOH, Congo red, and Patent Blue V 0.1%. The measurements were made on twenty counts each of the basidiospores (in side-view without hilum), basidia (without sterigmata), cheilocystidia, and pileipellis at 1000 × magnification per collection (Morozova et al. 2014). Spore length-width ratios were expressed as Q, and the average Q was expressed as Qav. Then, small parts of the lamellae were attached with double-sided adhesive tape on specimen holders, and coated with gold by an ion sputter coater (SBC-12, KYKY, China) for 40 s. Specimens were used to observe the spores by scanning electron microscopy (Phenom XL, Phenom-World, the Netherlands) in a low vacuum mode (15 kV). Additionally, spores of Deconica flavum were measured without hilum on concave and convex sides at × 5200 magnification. Dried specimens were stored in polyethylene zipper bags and deposited in the Herbarium of Hangzhou Normal University (HTC).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and determination of DNA sequences

DNA was extracted from dried basidiomata tissue using the Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide method (CTAB) (Morozova et al. 2014). The ITS (internal transcribed spacer) including ITS1, 5.8S and ITS2, and ribosomal large subunit (LSU) regions were amplified using the primer pair ITS1–F/ITS4, and LROR/LR5, respectively (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; Gardes and Bruns 1993). Amplified PCR products were verified by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with 4S Green Nucleic Acid (Sangon Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) in 1 × TAE. The PCR products were sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Forward and reverse sequence reads were assembled and edited by Bio Edit v.7.0.9 from specimens (Hall 1999). The new sequences generated in this study were deposited in GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) and listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Sources of sequences and their GenBank accession numbers that were used in this study.

Species name Specimen voucher Country ITS LSU
Clitocybe sclerotoidea iNAT:187491457 USA PP573968
Deconica bayliasiana OTA:71563 New Zealand OQ064952
D. bayliasiana PDD:105444 New Zealand KM975393
D. bayliasiana OTA:73288 New Zealand OQ065068
D. chionophila CBS:658.87 (Type) France NR_160176
D. chionophila FA 1743 France OR419908
D. citrispora PDD:87522 New Zealand KM975431
D. citrispora TENN:055373 Argentina KY559334
D. citrispora OL616138
D. cokeriana CCB45 (TENN) USA KC669315
D. cokeriana Ps482 USA MK965913
D. cokeriana PRM922477 USA MK965914
D. coprophila MHHNU 30335 MK214386
D. coprophila 257N1 OP237142
D. coprophila MHHNU 7935 OP862790
D. coprophila MHHNU 7937 OP862791
D. coprophila S62 OR237579
D. flavum 2381 China OR906279 OR906277
D. flavum 2382 China OR906280 OR906278
D. hartii CBS: 273.81 (Type) Canada MH861342
D. horizontalis DA-17014 France MZ234153
D. horizontalis FF15120 France MZ361342
D. horizontalis FF16067 France MZ363738
D. horizontalis MEL:2321097 Australia OL771718
D. horizontalis MEL Australia OL771719
D. horizontalis MEL Australia OL771720
D. horizontalis S.D. Russell iNaturalist #1827064 USA ON416969
D. magica HN170821119 France OM397446
D. micropora FJ596921 MW871601
D. milvispora PBM3781 (TENN) (holotype) Australia KC669314
D. milvispora TENN F-067013 (holotype) USA NR_176108
D. montana Hao & Guo & Han 131610 China MH425255
D. montana France MH862108
D. montana MICH:340541 USA MT913618
D. montana iNAT 37380190 USA OM203503
D. montana iNAT 37434339 USA OM203504
D. montana DAVFP:29764 Canada OQ225666
D. montana DAVFP:29781 Canada OQ225683
D. novae-zelandiae PDD:87768 New Zealand KM975401
D. overeemii DED 8328 (SFSU) Africa KX017212
D. phyllogena SFC20160714-66 MF437002
D. phyllogena Mushroom Observer # 282800 USA MK607529
D. phyllogena HFJAU-TD393 China MN622718
D. phyllogena ZMU197_ITS China MW724279
D. phyllogena HBAU15299 MW862324
D. pratensis L Netherlands MT622238
D. protea BAP 596 (SFSU) Africa KX017213
D. sp. TENN051714 USA HQ728541
D. sp. TFB12591 (TENN) USA KC669313
D. sp. Thailand KM270756
D. sp. Mushroom Observer # 340420 USA MK607606
D. sp. TENN-F-009938 USA MT622256
D. sp. LXYZF1 MZ452395
D. sp. OTA:73406 New Zealand OQ065091
D. sp. OTA:73424 New Zealand OQ065098
D. sp. FLAS-F-61579 USA MH211973
D. sp. RA712-7 USA MK234215
D. thailandensis XAL Thailand MT622245
D. umbrina XAL Malaysia MT622246
Entocybe haastii MEN 2004055/53 Netherlands KC710086
Entocybe haastii MEN 2006617 Netherlands KC710089
Entocybe haastii MEN 2011045 Netherlands KC710101
Entocybe haastii K(M):103926 UK MF977946
Entocybe haastii K(M):35980 UK MF977961
Entocybe haastii K(M):82407 UK MF977962
Entocybe haastii K(M):173454 UK MF977974
Entocybe haastii MEL:2379812 UK MF977980 MF977980
Entocybe haastii K(M):82407 UK MF977962
Entocybe nitida F14054 (UBC) Canada AF335449
Entocybe nitida UBC herbarium F14288 Canada AY228340
Entocybe nitida 287 Italy JF907989
Entocybe nitida MEN 8376 Netherlands KC710076
Entocybe nitida Hausknecht 2006201 Netherlands KC710100
Entocybe nitida MEN 200324 Netherlands KC710122
Entocybe nitida iNAT:17857763 USA OL602070 OL602070
Entocybe nitida iNAT:34316843 USA OM522259 OM522259
Entocybe nitida ME Noordeloos 200326 Netherlands GQ289175
Entocybe nitida NL-5402 USA MK277955
Entocybe sp. OMDL K. Canan iNaturalist # 185356854 USA PP156155
Entocybe roseoalbus 3461 China PP974446 PP974447
Entocybe roseoalbus 3462 China PP974445 PP974448
Entocybe trachyospora DAVFP:28111 Canada JF899553
Entocybe trachyospora den Bakker1153 Netherlands KC710088
Entocybe trachyospora den Bakker 1901 Netherlands KC710121
Entocybe trachyospora iNAT:17857961 USA OL602069 OL602069
Entocybe trachyospora OMDL K. Canan iNaturalist 103586037 USA OR824557 OR824557
Entocybe trachyospora TB5856 GU384629
Entocybe turbida PRM 915266 Czech Republic FJ824815
Entocybe turbida 16176 Italy JF908005
Entocybe turbida MEN200351 Netherlands KC710060
Entocybe turbida MQ18R373-QFB30889 Canada MN992146 MN992146
Entocybe turbida MQ18R118-QFB30634 Canada MN992147 -
Entocybe turbida MQ18R137-QFB30653 Canada MN992148 MN992148
Entocybe turbida F26446 Canada MZ314674
Entocybe turbida OMDL K. Canan iNaturalist # 188618716 USA PP156263 PP156263
Entocybe turbida TRTC175668 Canada PP383792
Entocybe turbida GLM 45919 Germany AY207198
Entocybe turbida ME Noordeloos 200351 Netherlands GQ289201
Entocybe turbida F26446 Canada MZ314674
Entocybe vinaceum TB8870 GU384631
Entoloma abortivum H. den Bakker 92 GQ289150
Entoloma abortivum HMJAU 1955 China JQ320131
Entoloma albotomentosum DA-20014 France OM368079 OM368079
Entoloma alcedicolor E. Arnolds 0276 Netherlands GQ289152
Entoloma alpicola TB6415 AF261302
Entoloma ameides RBG Kew K(M)128844 England EU784199
Entoloma assiduum KaiR1143 Cyprus OL338157
Entoloma baronii Gates E2292 Netherlands KC710093
Entoloma belouvense var. albertinae CME5 Panama MZ611628 MZ611628
Entoloma byssisedum var. microsporum SAAS1160 China KU534231
Entoloma caccabus ME Noordeloos 200324 GQ289155
Entoloma cetratum KaiR932 Austria OL338132 OL338132
Entoloma cf. vernum RH17-107 USA MW084700
Entoloma cf. vernum RH17-153 USA MW084701
Entoloma coeruleogracilis Gates E1777 Netherlands KC710069
Entoloma coeruleogracilis MEN 2004055 Netherlands KC710107
Entoloma contrastans L 0608161 Australia MK277982
Entoloma costatum G. Immerzeel 2000-10-10 Netherlands GQ289161
Entoloma depluens S.D. Russell ONT iNaturalist 129768621 USA OP549186 OP549186
Entoloma flavifolium TB6215 AF261301
Entoloma fuligineoviolaceum MEN 2009-071 Australia MK277989
Entoloma gracilior MEN 2011043 Netherlands KC710079
Entoloma gregarium SAAS1220 (Holotype) China KU534237
Entoloma gregarium SAAS1493 China KU534238
Entoloma gregarium SAAS:1220 (Holotype) China NG_153851
Entoloma haastii G. Gates E1777 Netherlands GQ289168
Entoloma heae SAAS1091 (Holotype) China KU534232
Entoloma heae SAAS1016 China KU534236
Entoloma heae SAAS1091 China NG_153850
Entoloma incanosquamulosum MD2014-13 Italy OL338320 OL338320
Entoloma nidorosum TB6263 AF261296
Entoloma nitidum TB7526 GU384626
Entoloma nubooccultatum KaiR687 (Holotype) Panama MZ611675 MZ611675
Entoloma ortonii KaiR1008 Germany OL338141
Entoloma ortonii KaiR1008 Germany OL338141
Entoloma paraconferendum CME6 (Holotype) Panama MZ611629 MZ611629
Entoloma paraconferendum CME7 Panama MZ611630 MZ611630
Entoloma platyphylloides 14740 Italy JF908003
Entoloma politum ME Noordeloos 200325 GQ289181
Entoloma sericatum M.T. Tholl #1991 Luxembourggg MW340721 MW340721
Entoloma sericatum ME Noordeloos 200328 Netherlands GQ289189
Entoloma silvae-frondosae L:DB6568 (Holotype) Hungary MH792065
Entoloma sp. EH37 Canada FJ717489
Entoloma sp. T503 Australia JF960759
Entoloma sp. CT-4335 USA KY462337
Entoloma sp. S.D. Russell MycoMap 6944 USA MK564545 MK564545
Entoloma sp. TENN:077957 USA PP831632 PP831632
Entoloma sp. EM677 Japan AB692015
Entoloma sp. 80812 China KJ648486
Entoloma sp. SAAS203 China KJ658971
Entoloma sp. SAAS712 China KJ658973
Entoloma sp. HGS-2021-8-23-6 OL336509
Entoloma sphagneti Bas 6.86 Netherlands KC710061
Entoloma sphagneti OW-E2-14 Norway KX945366
Entoloma undatum 16854 Italy JF908007
Entoloma undatum KUN-HKAS 115925 (WZ224) China MZ855875 MZ855875
Entoloma undatum HAY-F-004639 USA OR778327 OR778327
Entoloma undatum HAY-F-002256 USA PP575920 PP575920
Entoloma undatum HAY-F-004798 USA PP626490 PP626490
Entoloma vernum 1193 USA KX670983
Entoloma vezzenaense A. Hausknecht (ex WU 14588) Netherlands GQ289204
Kuehneromyces sp. Australia MK965912

Phylogenetic analyses

The newly generated sequences in the study were evaluated for quality using BioEdit and Blast search results as per Nilsson et al. (2012). Relevant sequence data including outgroups in phylogenetic analyses were downloaded from the GenBank. DNA sequences were aligned and manually modified in MEGA 11 (Kumar et al. 2018). Phylogenetic analyses were performed with Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) methods. ML phylogenetic analyses used IQ-Tree with 1,000 bootstrap replications (Minh et al. 2020). BI phylogenetic analyses were determined by Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling using MrBayes v.3.2.7 (Ronquist et al. 2012). BI was performed with six independent MCMC runs, and trees were sampled every 100 generations. The analyses were stopped after 5,000,000 generations when the average standard deviation of split frequencies was below 0.01.

Phylogenetic trees of Deconica were constructed using ITS and LSU sequence data following recent publications (Noordeloos 2009; da Silva et al. 2013; Gurung et al. 2019; Ramírez-Cruz et al. 2020a). The dataset of Deconica consists of 59 sequences for the ITS region including outgroup Kuehneromyces sp. (Ps1608) (Ramírez-Cruz et al. 2020a). In ML phylogenetic analysis, the best-fitting model was TPM2u+F+R3 determined by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017). In BI phylogenetic analysis, the model GTR+I+G was the best substitution model which was calculated by MrMTgui (https://mrmtgui.software.informer.com/).

Phylogenetic trees of Entocybe were constructed using the two concatenated ITSLSU sequences dataset. The dataset consists of 62 ITS sequences and 66 LSU sequences including outgroup Clitocybe sclerotoidea (iNAT:187491457). In ML phylogenetic analysis, the best-fitting model was TIM2+F+G4 (ITS) and TIM2+F+R2 (LSU) determined by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017). In BI phylogenetic analysis, the best-fit model was GTR+F+G4 and K2P+I+G4 using the BIC criterion for ITS and LSU separately (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017). The trees were visualized with FigTree v.1.4.0 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). The tree topologies recovered by ML and BI were similar. ML bootstrap support (BS) equal to or greater than 75% and Bayesian posterior probability (PP) equal to or greater than 0.95 were shown on the nodes in Figs 1, 2.

Figure 1. 

ML tree from ITS rDNA sequences of Deconica. Species described as new in this study are indicated in bold.

Figure 2. 

ML tree from combined ITS and LSU sequence data of Entocybe and Entoloma. Species described as new in this study are indicated in bold.

Results

The analyses of Deconica generated four supported clades, labeled a–d (Fig. 1). Clade a (BS = 99%, PP = 1.00) grouped D. flavum, D. cokeriana, D. thailandensis, D. overeemii, D. magica, D. bayliasiana, D. novae-zelandiae, D. milvispora, D. micropora, D. phyllogena, and D. umbrina. The clade contained six taxa with chrysocystidia i.e. D. flavum, D. cokeriana, D. thailandensis, D. overeemii, D. milvispora, and D. umbrina. Moreover, D. flavum, D. cokeriana, D. thailandensis and D. overeemii formed a subclade with strong bootstrap supports (BS = 94%, PP = 0.98) in clade a. Deconica flavum differs from D. cokeriana (MK965913), D. cokeriana (MK965914), D. cokeriana (KC669315) and D. sp. (MK607606) by 7 bp, 7 bp, 8 bp and 9 bp respectively. In the clade, all the species have small basidiomata, ellipsoid, rhomboid, hexagonal, or rhomboid-nodulose basidiospores. Two collections formed an independent lineage in the trees with strong bootstrap supports (BS = 100%, PP = 0.99) in clade a (Fig. 1). Clade b (BS = 100%, PP = 1.00) included D. protea, D. horizontalis, D. citrispora, D. hartii, and D. coprophila. Clade c (BS = 95%, PP = 0.97) included D. chionophila, D. montana, and D. coprophila. In clade d (BS = 97%, PP = 1.00), Deconica sp. and D. pratensis got clustered into one branch.

The analyses of Entocybe resulted in two well-supported clades, clade a and clade b (Fig. 2). Clade a mainly consists of Entocybe species (BS = 99%, PP = 1.00). Clade b is composed of most Entoloma species used in this study (BS = 99%, PP = 1.00). The trees showed that the new species identified as Entocybe formed a well-supported clade (BS = 100%, PP = 1.00) in clade a (Baroni et al. 2011).

Taxonomy

Deconica flavum Y.Y. Shen & Y.B. Song, sp. nov.

Index Fungorum: IF901538
Figs 3, 4

Etymology

The specific epithet flavum (Lat.) refers to the species having stramineous color in the center of the pileus.

Figure 3. 

Deconica flavum (holotype) a–c basidiomata d–e basidiospores f basidium g pleurocystidia type chrysocystidia h pleurocystidia type leptocystidium i cheilocystidia. Scale bars: 10 mm (a–c); 10 µm (d, g, h); 5 µm (e, f, i).

Holotype

• China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, National Nature Reserve of Mount Tianmu at 1162 m a.s.l., 30°21'N, 119°26.4'E (DDM), grew on litter under coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest, 2 July 2022, 2381 (holotype), GenBank accessions: OR906279 (ITS), OR906277 (LSU).

Figure 4. 

Micromorphological features of Deconica flavum (holotype) a basidiospores b basidia c pleurocystidia type leptocystidium d cheilocystidia e pleurocystidia type chrysocystidia. Scale bars: 10 µm.

Description

Pileus convex-campanulate, commonly papillate, light brown (6D8) or sunburn (6D5), center stramineus (5C8), (8–)10–20 mm; margin striate, invariable color when bruised, surface flocculose or with white fibrillose patches of veil on half of the pileus. Context fleshy on disk, pale yellowish (6A3). Lamellae adnexed to adnate, with decurrent tooth, distant, pompeian yellow (5C6), brown shellow (5C8), or gold brown (5D7). Stipe central, cylindrical, equal to broader at apex, hollow, cartilaginous, flocculose, 11–14 × 1.2–2.7 mm; dark blonde (5D4) to light brown (6D5), with yellowish white fibrils. Smell indistinct.

Basidiospores fusiform, ellipsoid to ovoid, yellowish brown under light microscopy with germ pore, the middle part concave under scanning electron microscopy, (3.0) 3.3–4.7 (5.1) × (2.2) 2.6–3.3 (4.3) µm, Q = 0.8–1.8, Qav = 1.4 (concave side), (3.6) 4.2–4.9 (5.1) × (2.9) 3.1–3.9 (4.0) µm, Q = 1.0–1.5, Qav = 1.3 (convex side) in frontal view. Basidia cylindrical or claviform with median constriction, 4-spored, hyaline, thin-walled, 11.7–17.1 × 3.8–5.7 µm. Pleurocystidia type chrysocystidia clavate to broadly clavate, apex mucronate or rostrate, thin-walled, hyaline, with hyaline content, 15.2–26.8 × 5.6–13.0 µm. Pleurocystidia type leptocystidium narrowly utriform, hyaline, thin-walled, abundant, 7.7–17.9 × 3.3–5.7 µm. Cheilocystidia widely utriform, cylindrical, hyaline, 12.3–20.5 × 3.6–5.2 µm. Pileipellis a gelatinous cutis 2.0–4.5 µm diam, hyaline, and thin-walled, with clamp connections. Stipitipellis a cutis 4.7–10.6 µm diam, hyaline, thin-walled, with clamp connections.

Habitat and distribution

Scattered on litter under coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forests at 1162 m a.s.l., currently only known from Zhejiang Province, China.

Additional material examined

(paratype). • China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, National Nature Reserve of Mount Tianmu at 1162 m a.s.l., 30°21'N, 119°26.4'E (DDM), grew on litter under coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest, 2 July 2022, 2382, GenBank accessions: OR9066280 (ITS), OR906278 (LSU).

Entocybe roseoalbus Y.Y. Shen & Y.B. Song, sp. nov.

Figs 5, 6

Etymology

The specific epithet roseoalbus (Lat.) refers to the pinkish-white stipe.

Holotype

• China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, National Nature Reserve of Mount Tianmu at 1025 m a.s.l., 30°20.4'N, 119°26.4'E (DDM), grew on humus under coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest, 2 September 2022, 3461 (holotype), GenBank accessions: PP974446 (ITS) and PP974447 (LSU).

Figure 5. 

Basidiomata of Entocybe roseoalbus (holotype) a habitat of Entocybe roseoalbus b whole basidiomata c lamellae of Entocybe roseoalbus d stipe of Entocybe roseoalbus. Scale bars: 10 mm.

Description

Pileus umbonate, undulating, occasional dehiscence in the middle, and slight dehiscence at the edge when mature, not hygrophanous, not translucent-striate, surface finely felted with densely appressed-fibrillose or matted-fibrillose, rivulose, blackish blue (20F7 or 20F8) in the middle, gradually lighter, becoming dark blue (20E6), 47–68 mm diam. Context white, 1.8–1.9 mm thick above the stipe. Lamellae unequal, adnate, margin slightly serrate, 23–26 × 9.3–11.2 mm (length × breadth), at first pinkish white (7A2) then pastel red (7A4) to pale red (7A3) with basidiospore maturity. Stipe central, 69–72 mm long, 7.2–7.7 mm (apex)–7.1–7.5 mm (middle)–8.3–8.8 mm (base) diam, equal but slightly thinner in the upper middle, hollow and splits longitudinally with ease, pinkish white (10A2), white at the base, fragile. Odor not distinctive. Taste not recorded.

Figure 6. 

Entocybe roseoalbus (holotype) a marginal cell b basidiospores under the light microscope in oil (1000×) c basidiospores under SEM (5200×) d–e basidia f–i cheilocystidia j pileocystidia k pileipellis l stipitipellis. Scale bars: 10 µm.

Basidiospores distinctly angular (6–8 angled) to some indistinctly and faintly rounded pustulate, ornamentation composed of broken ridges under an SEM, (4.0) 4.73–5.6 (6.5) × (4.6) 4.8–5.5 (6.1) µm, Q = 0.7–1.3, Qav = 1.0 in side-view. Basidia clavate, 3– or 4– sterigmate, filled with refractive oil bodies, 22.3–32.8 × 7.1–9.9 µm. Hymenial cystidia absent. Hymenophoral trama subregular, made up of cylindrical to slightly inflated elements, 36.9–92.5 × 11.6–22.8 µm. Lamella edge crowded with tufts of cheilocystidia. Cheilocystidia clavate, hyaline, abundant, 12.7–25.1 × 2.3–7.1 µm. Hymenial cystidia absent. Pileipellis multi-layered cutis, cylindrical, pigments intracellular, with special long and curved hyphae, 30.2–60.8 × 8–20.9 µm. Pileocystidia (terminal cells) narrowly cylindric to clavate, pigments intracellular, subtended by inflated cells of the pileal trama, 15.7–30.8 × 2.8–4.5 µm. Stipitipellis multi-layered cutis, similar to pileipellis, cylindrical hyphae, pigments intracellular, with special long and curved hyphae, 7.7–12.4 µm diam. Caulocystidia absent. Clamp connections present in all tissues.

Habitat and distribution

Scatted on humus under coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forests at 1025 m a.s.l., currently only known from Zhejiang Province, China.

Additional material examined

(paratype). • China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, National Nature Reserve of Mount Tianmu at 1025 m a.s.l., 30°20.4'N, 119°26.4'E (DDM), scatted on humus under coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest, 2 September 2022, 3462, GenBank accessions: PP974445 (ITS) and PP974448 (LSU).

Discussion

Deconica flavum is characterized by small and convex basidiomata with ellipsoid to ovoid basidiospores, two types of pleurocystidia, chrysocystidia and leptocystidia. It was growing on litter as other Deconica species. Entocybe roseoalbus is peculiar in having isodiametric basidiospores with 6–8 angles and broken ridges, pileipellis and stipitipellis with intracellular pigment, and abundant clamp connections in all tissues, as shown by the other Entocybe species. Furthermore, phylogenetically in ML and BI trees, the specimens formed two distinct lineages within Deconica and Entocybe, respectively (Figs 1, 2).

Deconica species are distributed worldwide, with notable records in Europe, America, South Asia, and Oceania (GBIF, https://www.gbif.org/search?q=Deconica). Many species of the genus Deconica have been described recently based on the ITS phylogenetic analysis (Ramírez-Cruz et al. 2013, 2020a, 2020b). In the present research work, ITS and LSU sequences of D. flavum were generated. Due to the lack of other gene sequences (LSU), we perform only single gene (ITS) phylogenetic analysis. The phylogenetic analysis of 58 ITS sequences from Deconica including two newly generated sequences formed four clades with strong bootstrap supports (Fig. 1). In clade a (BS = 99%, PP = 1.00), six taxa possess chrysocystidia, four of which are clustered into a subclade with strong bootstrap supports (BS = 94%, PP = 0.98). The four species included D. flavum, D. cokeriana, D. thailandensis and D. overeemii. Although the phylogenetical distances of D. flavum, and D. cokeriana are close in ITS trees, they have distinct differences in morphological and microscopic characteristics. Deconica flavum is lighter in pileus color than D. cokeriana, and has no discoloration when bruised. Interestingly, the center of the pileus is brow shellow, similar to “egg yolk” in D. flavum. Moreover, D. cokeriana stipe is yellowish white to light brown, with white to brownish fibrils, which become darker when bruised. While D. flavum is dark blonde to light brown, with yellowish-white fibrils. Microscopically, the pleurocystidia type chrysocystidia and leptocystidia of D. cokeriana (17–40 × 6.5–11 µm; 14–24 × 3.5–7 µm) are longer than D. flavum (15.2–26.8 × 5.6–13.0 µm; 7.7–17.9 × 3.3–5.7 µm). D. thailandensis and D. overeemii were originally described as Psilocybe species (Horak and Desjardin 2006; Horak et al. 2009). It is easy to differentiate D. thailandensis and D. flavum by basidiospores. Basidiospores of Deconica thailandensis and D. overeemii, originally described as Psilocybe species (Horak and Desjardin 2006; Horak et al. 2009), are rhomboid. Basidiospores of D. flavum are ellipsoid to ovoid, and the middle part is concave under SEM (Horak et al. 2009).

The nearly blue species in Entolomataceae, Entocybe haastii, E. nitida, Entoloma alcedicolor, E. eugenei, E. hochstetteri, E. mengsongense, E. tadungense and E. virescens have similar color in pileus and stipe (Noordeloos and Hausknecht 2007; Alves and do Nascimento 2012; Bergemann et al. 2013; Ediriweera et al. 2017). Entocybe roseoalbus is unique in having nearly blue pileus and yellowish grey stipe. Entocybe species are distributed worldwide, focused on Eastern Europe, the East and West coasts of North America, and Oceania (GBIF, https://www.gbif.org/search?q=Entocybe). The ITSLSU phylogenetic analysis of Entocybe resulted in clade a and clade b with strong bootstrap support (Fig. 2). The new species, Entocybe roseoalbus is close to Entocybe nitida, E. haastii, Entoloma alcedicolor, E. contrastans, E. fuligineoviolaceum and E. coeruleogracilis in the phylogenetical trees, which are clustered into one branch (BS = 88%, PP = –). They have distinct differences in morphological and microscopic characteristics. Compared with Entocybe roseoalbus, Entocybe nitida has comparatively smaller pileus (20–40 mm), darker stipe (grayish-blue), bigger spores (7–9 × 6–8 µm), and no cheilocystidia (Noordeloos 2004). On the other hand, Entocybe haastii has a robust and blackish blue stipe and bigger pileocystidia (54.1–81.1 × 2.5–7.8 µm) (Bergemann et al. 2013). Entoloma alcedicolor has steel blue pileus and stipe and garlic odor (Noordeloos 2004). Entoloma contrastans has smaller mycenoid basidiomata, white pileus (8–20 mm) with a slightly darker brown center, violaceus stipe (30–50 × 2 mm), and bigger spores (6.0–8.0 × 5.5–7.5 µm) (Noordeloos 2004). Entoloma fuligineoviolaceum has darker blue pileus and stipe, dark brown-violet to violet lamellae, and bigger spores (5.5–7.5(–8) × 5.5–6.5(–7) µm) (Noordeloos 2004). Entoloma coeruleogracilis has deeper blue basidiomata, smaller pileus (8–22 mm) and longer stipe (30–60 × 1–3 mm), and bigger spores (6.0–8.0 × 5.5–7.5 µm) (Noordeloos 2004).

In conclusion, sufficient evidence from morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses supports the distinction of D. flavum and Entocybe roseoalbus from other recorded species of the respective genus.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Xing-Qiang Wang and Jia-Jie Shi for collecting samples. We are grateful to Yu Yang for her help in experimentation. We appreciate Fang-Min Fei’s help in writing.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 32371580 and 31670429).

Author contributions

Morphological data, photo plates, phylogenetic analyses, and original drafts were completed by Yu-Yu Shen. Yao-Bin Song, Ming Dong, and Zi-Wen Zhang revised the paper. Wen-Qian Li revised the photo plates. Xing-Ning Liu, Fei-Ying Tian, and Wen-Hong Dai participated in molecular experiments. Chun-Mei Pang participated in the sample collection.

Author ORCIDs

Yu-Yu Shen https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4947-4266

Zi-Wen Zhang https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4045-8505

Wen-Qian Li https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1998-030X

Xing-Ning Liu https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0176-7943

Fei-Ying Tian https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3212-5261

Chun-Mei Pang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5346-8676

Wen-Hong Dai https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1238-3758

Yao-Bin Song https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9342-0423

Ming Dong https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1046-2140

Data availability

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study which can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/; https://indexfungorum.org/.

References

  • Alves MH, do Nascimento CC (2012) Entoloma virescens (Sacc.) E. Horak ex Courtec., 1986 (Agaricales: Entolomataceae): The first record for the Caatinga biome, Ceará, Brazil. Check List 8(3): 577–580. https://doi.org/10.15560/8.3.577
  • Baroni TJ, Hofstetter V, Largent DL, Vilgalys R (2011) Entocybe is proposed as a new genus in the Entolomataceae (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) based on morphological and molecular evidence. North American Fungi 6(12): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2509/naf2011.006.012
  • Baroni TJ, Lamoureux Y (2013) A new species of Entocybe (Entolomataceae, Agaricomycetes) from Québec, Canada. Mycotaxon 123(1): 353–361. https://doi.org/10.5248/123.353
  • Bergemann SE, Largent DL, Abell-Davis SE (2013) Entocybe haastii from Watagans National Park, New South Wales, Australia. Mycotaxon 126(1): 61–70. https://doi.org/10.5248/126.61
  • da Silva PS, Ramirez-Cruz V, Cortes-Perez A, Guzman G, Guzman-Davalos L, da Silveira RMB (2013) Deconica neorhombispora (Agaricales, Strophariaceae): New combination and synonym. Sydowia 65(2): 321–328.
  • da Silva PS, da Silveira RMB, Cortez VG (2014) Notes on Deconica and Psilocybe (Agaricales) from the southern border of Atlantic Forest and Pampa biomes of Brazil. Sydowia 66(2): 217–228. https://doi.org/10.12905/0380
  • Ediriweera AN, Karunarathna SC, Xu J, Hyde KD, Mortimer PE (2017) Entoloma mengsongense sp. nov. (Entolomataceae, Agaricales), a remarkable blue mushroom from Yunnan Province, China. Turkish Journal of Botany 41(5): 505–515. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1611-13
  • Gurung SK, Adhikari M, Kim SW, Lee HG, Jun JH, Gwon BH, Lee HB, Lee YS (2019) First report of Albifimbria verrucaria and Deconica coprophila (Syn: Psylocybe coprophila) from field soil in Korea. Korean Journal of Mycology 47(3): 209–218. https://doi.org/10.4489/KJM.20190025
  • Guzmán G (2005) Species diversity of the genus Psilocybe (Basidiomycotina, Agaricales, Strophariaceae) in the world mycobiota, with special attention to hallucinogenic properties. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 7(1): 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMedMushr.v7.i12.280
  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41(41): 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1999-0734.ch008
  • Horak E, Desjardin DE (2006) Agaricales of Indonesia. 6. Psilocybe (strophariaceae) from Indonesia (Java, Bali, Lombok). Sydowia 58(1): 15–37.
  • Horak E, Guzmán G, Desjardin DE (2009) Four new species of Psilocybe from Malaysia and Thailand, with a key to the species of sect. Neocaledonicae and discussion on the distribution of the tropical and temperate species. Sydowia 61(1): 25–37.
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TK, Von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Karsten PA (1879) Rysslands, Finlands och den Sakadinaviska halföns hattsvampar. Förra Denlen: Skifsvampar. Bidrag till Kännedom of Finlands natur och folk, 571 pp.
  • Kornerup AWJ, Wanscher JH (1978) Methuen Handbook of Colour. Methuen & Co. Ltd, London, 200–215.
  • Kumar SSG, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(6): 1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
  • Matheny PB, Curtis JM, Hofstetter V, Aime MC, Moncalvo JM, Ge ZW, Yang ZL, Slot JC, Ammirati JF, Baroni TJ, Bougher NL, Hughes KW, Lodge DJ, Kerrigan RW, Seidl MT, Aanen DK, DeNiti M, Daniele GM, Desjardin DE, Kropp BR, Norvell L, Parker A, Vellinga EC, Vilgalys R, Hibbett DS (2006) Major clades of Agaricales: A multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia 98(6): 982–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832627
  • Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, Von Haeseler A, Lanfear R (2020) IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37(5): 1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa015
  • Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R, Redhead SA, Johnson JE, James TY, Catherine M, Hofstetter V, Verduin SJW, Larsson E, Baroni TJ, Greg TR, Jacobsson S, Clemencon H, Miller OK (2002) One hundred and seventeen clades of euagarics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23(3): 357–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00027-1
  • Morozova OV, Noordeloos ME, Vila J (2014) Entoloma subgenus Leptonia in boreal-temperate Eurasia: Towards a phylogenetic species concept. Persoonia 32(1): 141–169. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158514X681774
  • Nilsson RH, Tedersoo L, Abarenkov K, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Hartmann M, Schoch CL, Nylander JAA, Bergsten J, Porter TM, Jumpponen A, Vaishampayan P, Ovaskainen O, Hallenberg N, Bengtsson-Palme J, Eriksson KM, Larsson KH, Larsson E, Koljalg U (2012) Five simple guidelines for establishing basic authenticity and reliability of newly generated fungal ITS sequences. MycoKeys 4(2): 37–63. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.4.3606
  • Noordeloos ME (1992) Entoloma s.l. Fungi Europaei 5. Candusso Edizioni, Italy.
  • Noordeloos ME (2004) Entoloma s.l. in Fungi Europaei Vol. 5A. Ed. Candusso: Alassio, Italy.
  • Noordeloos ME (2009) The genus Deconica (W.G. Sm.) P. Kast. in Europe-new combinations. Österr Z Pilzk 18: 208–210.
  • Noordeloos ME (2011) Strophariaceae s.l. Fungi Europeai no. 13. Canduso Edizione, Saronno, 647 pp.
  • Noordeloos ME, Hausknecht A (2007) The genus Entoloma (Basidiomycetes, Agaricales) of the Mascarenes and Seychelles. Fungal Diversity 27(1): 111–144.
  • Park MS, Cho HJ, Kim NK, Park JY, Lee H, Park KH, Kim MJ, Kim JJ, Kim C, Lim YW (2017) Ten new recorded species macrofungi on Ulleung Island, Korea. Mycobiology 45(4): 286–296. https://doi.org/10.5941/MYCO.2017.45.4.286
  • Ramírez-Cruz V, Rodríguez A, Matheny PB, Sánchez-García M, Guzmán-Dávalos L (2013) Phylogenetic inference and trait evolution of the psychedelic mushroom genus Psilocybe sensu lato (Agaricales). Botany 91(9): 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2013-0070
  • Ramírez-Cruz V, Cortes-Perez A, Borovicka J, Villalobos-Arambula AR, Matheny PB, Guzman-Davalos L (2020a) Deconica cokeriana (Agaricales, Strophariaceae), a new combination. Mycoscience 61(2): 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.myc.2019.07.001
  • Ramírez-Cruz V, da Silva PS, Villalobos-Arambula AR, Matheny PB, Noordeloos M, Morgado L, da Silveria RMB, Guzman-Davalos L (2020b) Two new species of Deconica (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from Australia and Mexico. Mycological Progress 19(11): 1317–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-020-01629-w
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Mark P, Ayres D, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard M, Huelsenbeck J (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Roskov Y, Ower G, Orrell T, Nicolson D, Bailly N, Kirk PM, Bourgoin T, DeWalt RE, Decock W, Van Nieukerken E, Zarucchi J, Penev L [Eds] (2019) Species 2000 & IT IS Catalogue of Life, 2019 Annual Checklist.
  • Singer R (1986) The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein.
  • Smith WG (1870) Clavis agaricinorum: An analytical key to the British Agaricini, with characters of the genera and subgenera. Journal of Botany, London 8: 213–233.
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172(8): 4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
  • Wu F, Zhou LW, Yang ZL, Bau T, Li TH, Dai YC (2019) Resource diversity of Chinese macrofungi: Edible, medicinal and poisonous species. Fungal Diversity 98(1): 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00432-7
login to comment