Research Article
Print
Research Article
Pezizomycotina species associated with rotten plant materials in Guizhou Province, China
expand article infoShamin Fu§, Jing-E Sun§, Entaj Tarafder, Nalin N. Wijayawardene|, Yan Hu, Yong Wang, Yan Li
‡ Guizhou University, Guiyang, China
§ Guizhou Zhunongjia Agricultural Science and Technology Service Co., Ltd, Guiyang, China
| Qujing Normal University, Qujing, China
¶ Weining Branch, Bijie Tobacco Company, Bijie, China
Open Access

Abstract

Nine Pezizomycotina strains were isolated from rotten dead branches and leaves collected from Guizhou Province. To obtain their accurate taxonomic placement, we provided the morphological characteristics of conidiophore cells and conidia. Phylogenetic relationships, based on ITS, rpb2, SSU, LSU and tub2 gene sequences, confirmed our strains represented three novel species, Peglionia falcata, Neoascochyta pseudofusiformis and Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica. Peglionia falcata produced falcate conidia and Neoa. pseudofusiformis generated fusiform conidia, while Neom. cylindrica possessed cylindrical conidia. The phylogenetic results also supported them as novel taxa. All the new species in the present study were found as saprophytic on forest litter with high rainfall, which suggest they may have a certain effect on nutrient decomposition and redistribution in forest ecosystems. Thus, it opened a way for further research on related ecological roles and their application production.

Key words

Ascomycota, morphology, phylogeny, taxonomy, three new taxa

Introduction

Pezizomycotina is the largest subphylum of Ascomycota (Spatafora et al. 2006; Wijayawardene et al. 2022a), which is large and diverse (the 10th edition of Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi estimates close to 70,000 Pezizomycetes species) (Charley and David 2017). These taxa often exist as saprophytes fed by herbivore faeces or grow on woody and non-woody plant tissues. However, some can also be pathogenic to some plants and animals or symbiotic with some plants as endophytes (Money 2016). Fungal studies, related to ascomycetous taxa have been extensively carried out in China and many novel taxa are introduced annually (Hyde et al. 2016; Wijayawardene et al. 2022b).

The genus Peglionia (Goidànich 1934) is distinguished from Circinotrichum and Gyrothrix by the branching pattern of the setae (Hernández-Restrepo et al. 2022). According to Hernández-Restrepo et al., Gyrothrix verticiclada (CBS 127654 phenotype, CBS 140226 and CBS 148329) clustered with G. hughesii in the phylogenetic tree as a distinct branch, which were defined as a new genus (Peglionia) (Hernández-Restrepo et al. 2022). Peglionia verticiclada (type species) is characterised by the production of curved conidia and setae with verticillate and straight branches at the apex and never circinate as in Circinotrichum, Gyrothrix or other members of Xylariales. In terms of morphological characteristics, the conidiogenous cells of Peglionia vary from inverted clavate to lagenate, appearing hyaline or subhyaline. The conidia are attached to the tips of the conidiogenous cells, presenting a dry sickle shape, without septa and presenting hyaline (Hernández-Restrepo et al. 2022).

Neomicrosphaeropsis (Didymellaceae) was introduced by Thambugala et al. (2017) based on morphology and molecular data; meanwhile, Phoma tamaricicola were recollected and accommodated to Neomicrosphaeropsis. There are currently 11 epithets in the genus Neomicrosphaeropsis in Mycobank (www.mycobank.org), but Neom. cystisi, Neom. cystisicola, Neom. cytisina and Neom. minima have been transferred to Microsphaeropsis (Wijayawardene et al. 2022b). This genus contains some pathogens or endophytes (Wijayawardene et al. 2017). In terms of morphological features, the conidiophores of the genus Neomicrosphaeropsis appear pustulate, almost submerged in agar and slightly vesicular. The outer wall of the conidiophore ranges from light to dark brown. Conidiogenous cells are cylindrical, appear hyaline, have a smooth surface and are aggregated singly or in multiples. Conidia are hyaline to light brown, with a smooth outer wall and are ovate to ellipsoid (Thambugala et al. 2017).

Chen et al. (2015) introduced Neoascochyta to accommodate taxa that morphologically resemble to Ascochyta, but phylogenetically distinct. Neoascochyta belongs to the Didymellaceae family and species in this family are primarily parasitic on wood and dead herbaceous stems or leaves (Hyde et al. 2013). Currently, 20 Neoascochyta species have been listed in MycoBank database (2024). This genus is morphologically characterised by pseudothecial ascomata, cylindrical to subclavate asci, cylindrical to ovoid, hyaline 1-septate ascospores. The asexual morph is coelomycetous and is characterised by pycnidial conidiomata, pseudoparenchymatous wall, obpyriform or ampulliform to doliiform conidiogeneous cells and hyaline fusoid to cylindrical, obclavate-ovoid to ellipsoidal conidia (Chen et al. 2015).

The purpose of this study was to introduce three new Pezizomycotina taxa collected in Guizhou Province, viz. Peglionia falcata, Neoascochyta pseudofusiformis and Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica. The present study was of great significance to enrich the diversity of Pezizomycotina in southwest China on the basis of morphological description and phylogeny combined with ITS, LSU, tub2 and rpb2 sequence data analysis. Meanwhile, since all three new species identified are saprophytic fungi, which play an important role in the process of organic matter decomposition, they can be further studied for their ecological effects, which will provide an important theoretical and practical basis for relevant applied research and potential value exploration, based on their roles in natural ecosystems.

Materials and methods

Fungal sampling, isolating and morphology

Sample collection was carried out in the summer of 2023, in a mountain forest in Yunyan District of Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, which was at a time of high rainy weather, with a large area covered by various kinds of vegetation. Decayed plant tissue samples were collected from the moist soil surface and brought back to the laboratory in self-sealing bags. The specimens were then examined for their macroscopic characteristics using a Nikon SMZ 745 series stereomicroscope and photographed, using a Canon 700D digital camera. Pure cultures were obtained using a single spore isolation method as described in (Senanayake et al. 2020). The germinated spores were transferred to fresh potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates and incubated at 25 °C for 14 days. Micro-morphological structures were photographed using a Nikon digital camera (Canon 700D) that was attached to a light microscope (Nikon Ni). Fruiting bodies on natural substrates were observed using a Zeiss Scope5 compound microscope Axioscope 5 (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) with the microscope techniques of differential interference contrast light (DIC) and photographed using an AxioCam 208 colour (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) camera and saved as JPG files. Approximately 30 morphological measurements of new species were made of each feature using the ZEN 3.0 (blue edition) (Jena, Germany) software.

Type specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of the Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural College, Guizhou University (HGUP). Ex-type cultures were deposited in the Culture Collection at the Department of Plant Pathology, Agriculture College, Guizhou University, P.R. China (GUCC). Taxonomic information of the new species was submitted to MycoBank (www.mycobank.org) and accession numbers are provided in the Taxonomy section of this paper.

DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification

The fungal strains were cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) (c = 40.1 g/l) medium in an incubator at 25 °C for 7 days and the mycelium was scraped with a sterile scalpel. Total DNA was extracted with a (Biomiga#GD2416, San Diego, California, USA) BIOMIGA Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (GD2416) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Five loci (ITS, tub2, SSU, LSU and rpb2) were selected for the total DNA extracted. Amplification was undertaken of forward and reverse primers, including the internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS), partial beta-tubulin gene (tub2), partial large subunit nrRNA gene (LSU), 18S small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU) and partial DNA-directed RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2) gene using the primer pairs ITS5/ITS4 (White et al. 1990), Bt2a/Bt2b (Woudenberg et al. 2009), LR0R/LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990), NS1/NS4 (White et al. 1990) and RPB2-5F2/RPB2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999), respectively. Amplification reactions profiles for LSU, ITS, and tub2 gene followed to Chen et al. (2015) and SSU accorded to White et al. (1990). The amplification for rpb2 was performed according to an improved protocol (Crous et al. 2013). PCR products were sequenced by SinoGegoMax (Beijing, China). The consensus sequences were assembled from forward and reverse sequences using Seqman Pro v. 10.0.1 (DNASTAR, Madison, USA). Novel sequences generated in this study were deposited in GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and their accession numbers are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Taxa and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in the phylogenetic analysis T = ex-holotype strain, F = non-type strain, ET = ex-epitype strain.

Current name Old name Strain number T/F Host Country GenBank Accession Numbers
ITS LSU tub2 rpb2 SSU
Circinotrichum circinatum Gyrothrix circinata CBS 140217 F Unidentified Malawi ON400747 ON400800 ON399330
Gyrothrix circinata CBS 140218 F Unidentified Malawi ON400748 ON400801 ON399331
Gyrothrix circinata CBS 140229 F Unidentified Zimbabwe ON400751 ON400804 ON399335
Gyrothrix circinata CBS 140230 F Unidentified Zimbabwe ON400752 ON400805 ON399334
Gyrothrix circinata CBS 140219 F Unidentified Malawi ON400749 ON400802 ON399332
Gyrothrix circinata CBS 140220 F Unidentified Malawi ON400750 ON400803 ON399333
Gyrothrix circinata CBS 148325 F Unidentified USA ON400745 ON400798 ON399329
Gyrothrix sp.” CBS 140235 F Unidentified Brazil ON400746 ON400799 ON399336
Gyrothrix circinata CBS 148326 F Unidentified Australia ON400743 ON400796 ON399328
Gyrothrix circinata CBS 148327 F Hakea sp. Australia ON400744 ON400797 ON399327
Gyrothrix sp.” CPC 26309 F Erica sp. France ON400742 ON400795 ON399326
Circinotrichum maculiforme Circinotrichum maculiforme CBS 122758 F Unidentified Spain KR611875.1 KR611896.1 ON399337
Circinotrichum maculiforme CBS 140016 ET Loranthus sp. Czech Republic KR611874.1 KR611895.1 ON399338
Circinotrichum maculiforme CBS 140225 F Unidentified Cuba ON400753 ON400806 ON399339
Circinotrichum sp. CPC 29975 F Cornus sanguinea France ON400754 ON400807 ON399340
Ceratocladium microspermum Ceratocladium microspermum CBS 488.77 F Quercus sp. Slovakia ON400740 ON400793 ON399324
Circiontrichum australiense Gyrothrix podosperma CBS 148706 T Unidentified Australia ON400741 ON400794 ON399325
Coniocessia nodulisporioides CBS 125776 F Unidentified Unknown MH863754.1 MH875222.1
Coniocessia nodulisporioides CBS 125777 F Unidentified Unknown MH863755.1 MH875223.1
Coniocessia cruciformis Coniocessia cruciformis CBS 125769 F Triticum aestivum Iran MH863750.1 MH875218.1
Pirozynkiomyces brasiliensis Gyrothrix circinata CBS 112314 T Unidentified Brazil ON400767 ON400819 ON399341
Circinotrichum sinense Circinotrichum sinense UAMH 11913 T Camellia cuspidata China KY994106.1 KY994107.1
Hansfordia pruni Hansfordia pruni CBS 125775 F Prunus persica Italy MH863753.1 MH875221.1
Hansfordia pruni CBS 125767 F Prunus persica Italy MH863748.1 MH875216.1
Hansfordia pruni CBS 125768 F Prunus persica Italy MH863749.1 MH875217.1
Selenodriella fertilis CBS 772.83 F Unidentified Unknown KP859055.1 KP858992.1
Selenodriella fertilis CPC 16273 F Unidentified Unknown ON400771 ON400823 ON399358
Selenodriella fertilis CBS 144589 F Unidentified Unknown MK442624.1 MK442560.1
Circinotrichum rigidum Circinotrichum rigidum CBS 148328 F Eucalyptus sp. Australia ON400772 ON400824 ON399359
Selenodriella brasiliana Circinotrichum australiense CBS 140227 T Unidentified Brazil ON400769 ON400821 ON399356
Circinotrichum sp.” CBS 140236 F Unidentified Brazil ON400770 ON400822 ON399357
Selenodriella cubensis Selenodriella cubensis CBS 683.96 T Unidentified Cuba KP859053.1 KP858990.1
Peglionia verticiclada Gyrothrix verticiclada CBS 101171 F Unidentified Venezuela ON400766 ON400818 ON399355
Gyrothrix verticiclada CBS 140226 F Unidentified Venezuela ON400764 ON400816 ON399354
Gyrothrix verticiclada CBS 127654 ET Smilax aspera Italy ON400763 ON400815 ON399352
Gyrothrix verticiclada CBS 148329 F Eucalyptus sp. Australia ON400765 ON400817 ON399353
Peglionia falcata GUCC 23-0042 T Unidentified China PP295269 PP314032 PP396044
Peglionia falcata GUCC 23-0043 F Unidentified China PP295270 PP314033 PP396045
Peglionia falcata GUCC 23-0044 F Unidentified China PP295271 PP349828 PP396046
Microdochium lycopodinum CBS 125585 F Unidentified Unknown NR_145223.1 KP858952.1 KP859125.1
Idriella lunata CBS 204.56 F Fragaria chiloensis var. ananassa USA MH857584.1 MH869129.1
Zygosporium pseudomassoni CBS 146059 F Unidentified Unknown NR_166342.1 NG_068340.1 MN556815.1
Zygosporium mycophilum CBS 894.69 F Unidentified Unknown MH859474.1 MH871255.1
Monosporascus cannonballus ATCC 26931 T Cucumis melo USA NR_111370.1
Monosporascus nordestinus CMM 4846 F Trianthema portulacastrum Brazil MG735241 MG748810.1
Monosporascus caatingaensis CMM 4833 F Boerhavia diffusa Brazil MG735228.1 MG748797.1
Diatrypella vulgaris CBS 128329 F Citrus paradisi Australia MH864880.1 MH876328.1
Diatrype disciformis CBS 197.49 F Unidentified Unknown DQ470964.1 DQ470915.1
Acrocordiella occulta CBS 140500 F Unidentified Unknown KT949893.1 MH878156.1
Neomicrosphaeropsis alhagi-pseudalhagi MFLUCC 17-0825 T Alhagi pseudalhagi Uzbekistan MH069664 MH069670 MH069689 MH069676
Neomicrosphaeropsis elaeagni MFLUCC 17-0740 T Elaeagnus angustifolia Russia MH069666 MH069672 MH069691 MH069678
Neomicrosphaeropsis italica MFLUCC 15-0485 T Tamarix sp. Italy KU900318 KU729854 KU900309
Neomicrosphaeropsis italica MFLUCC 16-0284 F Tamarix sp. Italy KU900321 KU900296 KX453299 KU900311
Neomicrosphaeropsis italica MFLUCC 15-0484 F Tamarix sp. Italy KU900319 KU729853 KX453298
Neomicrosphaeropsis italica MFLUCC 15-0487 F Tamarix sp. Italy KU900320 KU729852 KU900310
Neomicrosphaeropsis juglandis MFLUCC 18-0795 T Juglans regia Turkey MN244223 MN244206 MN871954 MN244183
Neomicrosphaeropsis novorossica MFLUCC 14-0578 T Tamarix ramosissima South European Russia KX198709 KX198710 KX198711
Neomicrosphaeropsis rossica MFLUCC 14-0586 T Tamarix ramosissima South European Russia KU752192 KU729855 KU870914
Neomicrosphaeropsis tamaricicola MFLUCC 14-0443 F Tamarix sp. Italy KU900322 KU729851 KU900312
Neomicrosphaeropsis tamaricicola MFLUCC 14-0439 F Tamarix sp. Italy KU900323 KU729858 KU900313
Neomicrosphaeropsis tamaricicola MFLUCC 14-0602 T Tamarix sp. Italy KM408753 KM408754 MH069692 KM408755
Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica GUCC23-0048 T Unidentified China PP314028 PP314039 PP396056 PP396050 PP316087
Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica GUCC23-0049 F Unidentified China PP314030 PP316086 PP396057 PP396051 PP316089
Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica GUCC23-0050 F Unidentified China PP314031 PP316082 PP396058 PP396052 PP316088
Microsphaeropsis minima Neomicrosphaeropsis minima MFLUCC 13-0394 F Verbascum sp. Italy KX572336 KX572341 KX572346
Microsphaeropsis cytisina Neomicrosphaeropsis cytisina MFLU 16-1364 T Cytisus scoparius Italy KX611243 KX611241 KX611242
Microsphaeropsis cystisicola Neomicrosphaeropsis cystisicola MFLUCC 18-0355 T Cytisus sp. Italy MH069665 MH069671 MH069690
Microsphaeropsis cytisi Neomicrosphaeropsis cystisi MFLUCC 13-0396 T Cytisus sp. Italy KX572337 KX572342 KX572347
Microsphaeropsis fusca CBS 116670 T Sarothamnus scoparius The Netherlands MN973573 MT018220 MT018220
Microsphaeropsis rafniae CMW 57792 T Rafnia amplexicaulis South Africa OR209698 OR209716 OR211858
Microsphaeropsis viridis CBS 763.73 F Populus tremula France MN973561 MN943768 MT018210
Microsphaeropsis taxicola CBS 469.80 F Rhus typhina The Netherlands MN973565 MN943772 MT018210
Neodidymelliopsis ranunculi MFLUCC 13-0490 T Unidentified Italy MN944410 MT020377 KX572348
Neoascochyta adenii CBS 142108 T Adenium obesum Thailand KY173423 KY173514 KY173607
Neoascochyta argentina CBS 112524 T Triticum aestivum Argentina KT389524 KT389742 KT389822
Neoascochyta cylindrispora CBS 142456 T Homo sapiens USA LT592963 LN907502 LT593032
Neoascochyta dactylidis MFLUCC 13-0495 T Dactylis glomerata Italy NR_170041
Neoascochyta desmazieri CBS 297.69 T Lolium perenne Germany KT389508 KT389726 KT389806
Neoascochyta desmazieri CBS 758.97 F Unidentified Norway KT389509 KT389727 KT389807
Neoascochyta desmazieri CBS 247.79 F Gramineae Austria KT389507 KT389725 KT389805
Neoascochyta europaea CBS 820.84 T Hordeum vulgare Germany KT389511 KT389729 KT389809
Neoascochyta europaea CBS 819.84 F Hordeum vulgare Germany KT389510 KT389728 KT389808
Neoascochyta exitialis CBS 812.84 F Hordeum vulgare Germany KT389517 KT389735 KT389815
Neoascochyta exitialis CBS 811.84 F Secale cereale Germany KT389516 KT389734 KT389814
Neoascochyta exitialis CBS 389.86 F Triticum aestivum Switzerland KT389515 KT389733 KT389813
Neoascochyta exitialis CBS 113693 F Allium sp. Sweden KT389513 KT389731 KT389811
Neoascochyta exitialis CBS 110124 F Triticum sp. Netherlands KT389512 KT389730 KT389810
Neoascochyta fuci CMG 47/MUM19.41 T Fucus sp. Portugal MN053014 MN066618
Neoascochyta fuci CMG 48 F Fucus sp. Portugal MN053015 MN066619
Neoascochyta fusiformis CBS 876.72 T Triticum sp. South Africa KT389527 KT389745 KT389825
Neoascochyta graminicola CBS 816.84 F Hordeum vulgare Germany KT389523 KT389741 KT389821
Neoascochyta graminicola CBS 815.84 F Hordeum vulgare Germany KT389522 KT389740 KT389820
Neoascochyta graminicola CBS 447.82 F Triticum aestivum Germany KT389520 KT389738 KT389818
Neoascochyta graminicola CBS 301.69 F Lolium multiflorum Germany KT389519 KT389737 KT389817
Neoascochyta graminicola CBS 102789 F Lolium perenne New Zealand KT389518 KT389736 KT389816
Neoascochyta humicola CBS 127323 T Unidentified USA MN973628 MN943837 MT005740
Neoascochyta longispora CBS 113420 T Cerastium semidecandrum New Zealand MN973629 MN943838 MT005741
Neoascochyta mortariensis CBS 516.81 T Gramineae Italy KT389525 KT389743 KT389823
Neoascochyta paspali CBS 560.81 T Paspalum dilatatum New Zealand FJ427048 GU238124 FJ427158
Neoascochyta paspali CBS 561.81 F Lolium perenne New Zealand GU237889 GU237640
Neoascochyta paspali ICMP 6614 F Paspalum dilatatum New Zealand KT309957 KT309539
Neoascochyta paspali ICMP 6819 F Dactylis glomerata New Zealand KT309992 KT309572
Neoascochyta paspali ICMP 6615 F Lolium perenne New Zealand KT309958 KT309540
Neoascochyta rosicola MFLUCC 15-0048 T Rosa canina Italy MG828921 MG829031
Neoascochyta soli LC 8165 T Unidentified China KY742121 KY742275 KY742363
Neoascochyta soli LC 8166 F Unidentified China KY742122 KY742276 KY742364
Neoascochyta tardicrescens CBS 689.97 T Unidentified Norway KT389526 KT389744 KT389824
Neoascochyta triticicola CBS 544.74 T Triticum aestivum South Africa GU237887 EU754134 GU237488
Neoascochyta yunnanensis YCW1883 T Camellia sinensis China OP648090 OP837280 OP854553
Neoascochyta zhejiangensis YCW1361 T Camellia sinensis China OP648091 OP083837281 OP854554
Neoascochyta pseudofusiformis GUCC 23-0045 T Unidentified China PP314026 PP314037 PP396053 PP396047 PP345789
Neoascochyta pseudofusiformis GUCC 23-0046 F Unidentified China PP314027 PP314038 PP396054 PP396048 PP301319
Neoascochyta pseudofusiformis GUCC 23-0047 F Unidentified China PP314029 PP314036 PP396055 PP396049 PP301320
Vandijckomycella joseae CBS 143011 T Unidentified Unknown NR_168247 NG_068687
Vandijckomycella snoekiae CBS 144954 T Unidentified Unknown NR_168248 NG_068688 MN824765

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses

After primary BLAST alignment, all our nine isolates could not be affiliated to any of the currently-known species. Thus, the related sequences were added to the sequence alignment for phylogenetic analyses. Available sequences of species in relative genera containing ex-type or representative isolates were downloaded from GenBank (Table 1) according to previous publications (Li et al. 2018, 2020; Vu et al. 2019; Chen et al. 2020; Chu et al. 2021; Yukako et al. 2021). Alignments for the individual locus matrices were generated with the online version of MAFFT v. 7.307 (Katoh et al. 2019). The alignments were checked visually and improved manually where necessary using BioEdit v. 7.0.5.2 (Hall 1999). Ambiguous regions were excluded from the analyses and gaps were treated as missing data. Sequence matrix v. 1.7.8 was used to concatenate the aligned sequences (Vaidya et al. 2011). In Fig. 1, Acrocordiella occulta (CBS 140500) was selected as outgroup, in Fig. 2, Vandijckomycella joseae (CBS 143011) and V. snoekiae (CBS 144954) were selected as outgroup and, in Fig. 3, Neodidymelliopsis ranunculi (MFLUCC 13-0490) was selected as outgroup. Maximum Likelihood (ML), Maximum Parsimony (MP) and Bayesian Inference (BI) were used to place the newly-discovered strains into a phylogenetic framework and estimate their phylogenetic relationships. ML analysis was performed using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015; Trifinopoulos et al. 2016) on the IQ-TREE web server (http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at, 17 February 2024). The MP analysis was implemented to test the discrepancy of the ITS, rpb2, LSU, SSU and tub2 sequence datasets with PAUP v. 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002). Gaps were treated as missing data, which were interpreted as uncertainty of multistate taxa. MP trees were generated using the heuristic search option with tree bisection re-connection (TBR) branch swapping. “Maxtrees” was set to 5000, the tree length (TL), consistency index (CI), homoplasy index (HI), retention index (RI) and rescaled consistency index (RC) were calculated. BI was performed using six Markov Chain Monte Carlo runs for 5,000,000 generations, sampling every 1000 generations. The first 25% resulting trees were discarded as the burn-in phase of each analysis.

Figure 1. 

Trees resulting from ML analysis of the combined ITS, rpb2 and LSU sequence alignment for forty-nine isolates in Coniocessiaceae and Microdochiaceae. RAxML and MP bootstrap support values (ML, MP ≥ 70%) and Bayesian posterior probability (PP ≥ 0.95) are denoted on the nodes (ML/MP/PP). The tree was rooted to Acrocordiella occulta (CBS 140500). New species are highlighted in red. The scale bar indicates 0.06 expected changes per site. T = ex-holotype strain, ET = ex-epitype strain.

Figure 2. 

Trees resulting from ML analysis of the combined ITS, tub2 and LSU sequence alignment for thirty-seven isolates in Neoascochyta. RAxML and MP bootstrap support values (ML, MP ≥ 65%) and Bayesian posterior probability (PP ≥ 0.65) are denoted on the nodes (ML/MP/PP). The tree was rooted to Vandijckomycella joseae (CBS 143011) and Vandijckomycella snoekiae (CBS 144954). New species are highlighted in red. The scale bar indicates 0.03 expected changes per site. T = ex-holotype strain.

Figure 3. 

Trees resulting from ML analysis of the combined ITS, SSU and LSU sequence alignment for twelve isolates in Neomicrosphaeropsis and eight isolates in Microsphaeropsis. RAxML and MP bootstrap support values (ML, MP ≥ 60%) and Bayesian posterior probability (PP ≥ 0.65) are denoted on the nodes (ML/MP/PP). The tree was rooted to Neodidymelliopsis ranunculi (MFLUCC13-0490). New species are highlighted in red. The scale bar indicates 0.002 expected changes per site. T = ex-holotype strain.

Results

In the phylogenetic analyses, the MP, ML and Bayesian results obtained similar topologies, thus the ML topologies were edited and shown as Figs 13. For the Peglionia and related genera (Fig. 1), the combined data matrix of ITSLSUrpb2 consisted of 2366 characters (ITS: 761, LSU: 885 and rpb2: 720), amongst which 612 are parsimony informative characters. Maximum Parsimony analysis with the following parameters: TL = 2197; CI = 0.5294; HI = 0.4706; RI = 0.8182; and RC = 0.4331 indicated that Peglionia falcata strains (GUCC-0042, GUCC-0043 and GUCC-0044) without the DNA base differences in three loci formed an independent branch (ML = 100, MP = 100, PP = 1.00) and maintained a close relationship to P. verticiclada (CBS 127654, CBS 148329, CBS 101171 and CBS 140226) (ML = 100, MP = 99, PP = 1.00).

The combined data matrix of Neoascochyta (ITSLSUtub2) yielded 1784 characters (ITS: 489, LSU: 959 and tub2: 336). The MP analysis, based on 194 parsimony informative characters (1480 characters were constant and 110 variable characters), produced the phylogenetic tree with the following parameters: TL = 562; CI = 0.6975; HI = 0.3025; RI = 0.8932; and RC = 0.6230. The result (Fig. 2) displayed that Neoascochyta pseudofusiformis (GUCC23-0045, GUCC23-0046 and GUCC23-0047) formed an independent branch without the DNA base differences in three loci supported by strong statistic data (ML = 99, MP = 100, PP = 1.00) and were adjacent to the branch of Neoascochyta argentina CBS 112524 and N. tardicrescens (CBS 689.97) (ML = 75, MP = 87, PP = 0.65).

In Fig. 3, the combined data matrix of Neomicrosphaeropsis (ITSLSUSSU) including 2328 characters (ITS: 484, LSU: 833 and SSU: 1011), only had 17 parsimony informative characters. The MP analysis (TL = 51; CI = 0.8627; HI = 0.1373; RI = 0.9136; and RC = 0.7882) indicated the three strains of Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica (GUCC 23-0048, GUCC 23-0049 and GUCC 23-0050) as a branch without genetic distance (ML = 93, MP = 93.2, PP = 0.99) adjoining to the clade (ML = 86, MP = 60.3, PP = 0.99) including Neom. rossica, Neom. novorossica and Neom. italica. The phylogenetic placements of these novel taxa were also supported by DNA base-pair differences (Table 2).

Table 2.

The DNA base differences of our isolates and related taxa in different loci.

Species Strain number ITS (1–761 characters) LSU (762–1646 characters) rpb2 (1647–2366 characters)
Peglionia falcata GUCC-0042 0 0 0
Peglionia falcata GUCC-0043 0 0 0
Peglionia falcata GUCC-0044 0 0 0
Peglionia verticiclada CBS 127654 20 (gaps: 4) 13 (gap: 0) 69 (gap: 0)
Peglionia verticiclada CBS 101171 19 (gaps: 4) 17 (gap: 1) 65 (gap: 0)
Peglionia verticiclada CBS 683.96 36 (gaps: 7) 25 (gaps: 2) /
Peglionia verticiclada CBS 140227 39 (gaps: 6) 26 (gaps: 2) 84 (gap: 0)
Species Strain number ITS (1–489 characters) LSU (490–1448 characters) tub2 (1449–1784 characters)
Neoascochyta pseudofusiformis GUCC23-0045 0 0 0
Neoascochyta pseudofusiformis GUCC23-0046 0 0 0
Neoascochyta pseudofusiformis GUCC23-0047 0 0 0
Neoascochyta soli LC 8166 24 (gap: 3) 16 (gap: 0) 35 (gap: 1)
Neoascochyta argentina CBS 112524 18 (gap: 0) 2 (gap: 0) 29 (gap: 1)
Neoascochyta tardicrescens CBS 689.97 23 (gap: 0) 2 (gap: 0) 30 (gap: 1)
Neoascochyta mortariensis CBS 516.81 20 (gap: 0) 2 (gap: 0) 30 (gap: 1)
Neoascochyta rosicola MFLUCC 15-0048 24 (gaps: 0) 3 (gap: 0) /
Species Strain number ITS (1–484 characters) LSU (485–1317) SSU (1318–2328 characters)
Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica GUCC 23-0048 0 0 0
Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica GUCC 23-0049 0 0 0
Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica GUCC 23-0050 0 0 0
Neomicrosphaeropsis rossica MFLUCC 14-0586 4 (gap:0) 4 (gap: 0) 1 (gap: 1)
Neomicrosphaeropsis novorossica MFLUCC 14-0578 5 (gap:0) 3 (gap: 0) 1 (gap: 0)
Neomicrosphaeropsis alhagi-pseudalhagi MFLUCC 17-0825 5 (gaps:0) 2 (gap: 0) 0

Taxonomy

Peglionia falcata S.M. Fu & Yong Wang bis, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 854204
Fig. 4

Etymology

In reference to the fungus, which produced falcate conidia.

Diagnosis

Peglionia falcata is characterised by dry falcate meriform spores (24.1 × 2.9 μm; L/W = 8.005).

Figure 4. 

Peglionia falcata (GUCC23-0042) a, b appearance on host surface c, d culture characteristics on PDA (c above view d reverse view) e–m conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia n conidia. Scale bars: 20 µm (e–n).

Type

China, Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, 26°57'N, 106°72'E, from rotten dead branch, 19 July 2023, S.M. Fu, HGUP 23-0013 (holotype), ex-type culture GUCC23-0042.

Culture characteristics

Colonies on PDA, after 8 d, 20–25 mm diam., scarce aerial mycelium, dark brown, white to the periphery, margin entire, reverse dark brown. Occasionally, when a seta bears only two apical branches, one or both can be once forked. Conidiogenous cells polyblastic, obclavate to lageniform, hyaline to subhyaline. Conidia adherent in a continuous white layer on the conidiogenous cells, dry falcate, non-septate, hyaline. Chlamydospores (in culture) in chains, subglobose to irregularly-shaped, subhyaline to brown. Sexual morph not observed. Colonies hypophyllous, scattered, up to 1 mm wide, occasionally larger by confluence, velvety, black when sterile and whitish within when sporulating profusely. Conidiogenous cells obclavate to lageniform, hyaline to subhyaline, distally with a somewhat irregular contour, 5–16.5 × 4–7 µm (x̄ = 9.8 × 5.3 μm, n = 20). Conidia adherent in a continuous white layer on the conidiogenous cells, falcate, non-septate, hyaline,18–30 × 2.5–3.5 µm (x̄ = 24.1 × 2.9 μm, n = 30).

Habit

On rotten dead branches.

Distribution

China, Guizhou Province, Guiyang City

Other materials examined

China, Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, 26°57'N, 106°72'E, from rotten dead branch, 19 July 2023, S.M. Fu, HGUP 23-0013, living culture GUCC23-0042, GUCC23-0043 and GUCC23-0044.

Notes

In morphology, Peglionia falcata differs to P. verticiclada by its larger conidiogenous cells (4–7 μm wide vs. 3–5 μm wide in P. verticiclada) and larger conidia (18–30 μm vs. 17–22 μm in P. verticiclada) (Hernández-Restrepo et al. 2022). The phylogenetic analyses and DNA base differences (Table 2) also supported P. falcata as a novel taxon was distinct from P. verticiclada.

Neoascochyta pseudofusiformis S.M. Fu & Yong Wang bis, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 854206
Fig. 5

Etymology

In reference to the fungus, which produced fusiform conidia morphologically similar to Neoascochyta fusiformis.

Figure 5. 

Neoascochyta pseudofusiformis (GUCC 23-0045) a, b appearance on host surface c colonies on host surface d–g culture characteristics on PDA, WA (d, f above view e, g reverse view) h colonies on WA i–k conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia l conidia. Scale bars: 20 µm (il).

Diagnosis

Neoascochyta pseudofusiformis is characterised by oval to fusiform conidia (3.6 × 1.9; L/W = 1.896) with moderate growth rate.

Type

China, Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, 26°57'N, 106°72'E, from rotten dead branch, 19 July 2023, S.M. Fu, HGUP 23-0014 (holotype), ex-type culture GUCC23-0045.

Culture characteristics

Colonies on PDA, 70–75 mm diam. after 7 d, margin regular, covered by floccose aerial mycelium, greyish-olivaceous, with flat and greenish-black flat mycelium near the margin; reverse black olivaceous. Mycelium is light to dark grey, separated, smooth, thin to thick wall. Acicular conidium, grey to dark grey, solitary or conjunctival, immersed in culture (WA), glabrous, subglobular, 100–250 × 90–130 μm, with a single pore neck; The angular textured cylindrical wall consists of 2 to 4 layers of flat polygonal cells 10–50 μm thick. The meristem cells are biparental, transparent, smooth-walled, pot or spherical, 3 × 5 μm wide. The conidia are 0–1 septum, transparent, smooth, thick-walled, mostly fusiform or slightly allantoic, 3.0–4.5 × 1.5–2.5 μm (x̄ = 3.6 × 1.9 μm, n = 30).

Habit

On rotten dead branches.

Distribution

China, Guizhou Province, Guiyang City

Other materials examined

China, Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, 26°57'N, 106°72'E, from rotten dead branches, 19 July 2023, S.M. Fu, HGUP 23-0014, living culture GUCC23-0045, GUCC23-0046 and GUCC23-0047.

Notes

The present taxon differs morphologically to related species by conidial size range (3.0–4.5 × 1.5–2.5 μm vs. 16.5–27 × 5–8.5 μm in N. argentina and 2.5–3.5 × 1.0–1.5 μm in N. tardicrescens) (Chen et al. 2017; Valenzuela-Lopez et al. 2018). In phylogeny, our novel taxon maintained a close relationship to N. argentina CBS 112524 and N. tardicrescens CBS 689.97; however, DNA base differences (Table 2) supported that they belonged to different taxa.

Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica S.M. Fu & Yong Wang bis, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 854207
Fig. 6

Etymology

In reference to the fungus, which produced cylindrical conidia.

Diagnosis

Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica is characterised by broadly cylindrical conidia (15.4 × 3.4; L/W = 4.574) with moderate growth rate.

Figure 6. 

Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica (GUCC 23-0048) a appearance on host surface b–e culture characteristics on PDA, WA (b–d above view c–e reverse view) f–g colonies on PDA h–l conidiophores, Conidiogenous cells and Conidia m conidia. Scale bars: 100 µm (h); 50 µm (i–k); 20 µm (l–m).

Type

China, Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, 26°57'N, 106°72'E, from rotten dead leaves, 19 July 2023, S.M. Fu, HGUP 23-0015 (holotype), ex-type culture GUCC23-0048.

Culture characteristics

Saprobic on dead leaves. Colony on PDA, 35–38 mm diameter, after 7 days, dense low-altitude hypha, light yellow, centre with abundant stigma; Turning light yellow to rose light yellow, the centre of concentric circles is darker; on MEA, after 7 days, 28–30 mm, the edge is intact, dense hypoxic mycelium, the edge is yellowish; reverse rose-yellowish to yellowish at margin with abundant scattered on stigma; Conidia cylindrical, spherical to kettle-shaped, 200–350 μm in diameter, tan to black, solitary, population centre abundant, banded, glabrous, without papillae; the cell wall is angular textured, light brown, bifid, cylindrical, thin-walled, transparent. Conidia occasionally septate, 12.5–18.5 × 2.4–4.0 μm (x̄ = 15.4 × 3.4 μm, n = 30), cylindrical, transparent, thin-walled.

Sexual stage

Not observed.

Habit

On rotten dead leaves.

Distribution

China, Guizhou Province, Guiyang City.

Other materials examined

China, Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, 26°57'N, 106°72'E, from rotten dead leaf, 19 July 2023, S.M. Fu, HGUP 23-0015, living culture GUCC23-0048, GUCC23-0049 and GUCC23-0050.

Notes

Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica (GUCC 23-0048) formed a clade with N. rossica (MFLUCC 14-0586) and N. alhagi-pseudalhagi (MFLUCC 17-0825) (Fig. 3). However, by morphological comparison, our species produced obviously longer conidia than N. rossica (12.5–18.5 × 2.4–4.0 μm vs. 4.4–5.7 × 2.9–3.9 μm) and smaller conidia than N. alhagi-pseudalhagi (12.5–18.5 × 2.4–4.0 μm vs. 30–45 × 18–22 μm) (Thambugala et al. 2017; Wanasinghe 2018).

Discussion

According to Hernández-Restrepo et al. (2022), four strains of Peglionia verticiclada totally originated from decayed plant tissues in Europe and Australia. Our Peglionia species was also collected from rotten dead branches, which was the first discovery in China. In the database of Index Fungorum, Neoascochyta has 20 epithets and three of them were described by Chinese mycologists (Chen et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2024). Interestingly, the plant hosts of Neoascochyta spp. were mostly reported in the Gramineae family, such as Triticum sp., Hordeum sp. and Paspalum sp. (Chen et al. 2015, 2017; Hou et al. 2020). However, only two taxa (Neoascochyta soli and our N. pseudofusiformis) were both isolated from Guizhou, China and related to saprobic environments (Chen et al. 2017). In the test of inhibiting the germination of rust spores, the number of rust spots on leaves were significantly reduced after Neoascochyta treatment, which may provide a potential biological control method against rust diseases (Wilson et al. 2020). Neomicrosphaeropsis cylindrica was also the first species in Neomicrosphaeropsis to be discovered and described in China. This genus presented high correlations with alcohol and acids and was the highest contributors to the generation of volatile compounds, especially during alcohol production (Ma et al. 2021). Members of this genus were mostly obtained from Salicaceae as saprophytic fungi (Hyde et al. 2016; Thambugala et al. 2017). All our three Pezizomycotina taxa were isolated from rotten branches or leaves, which indicated that the diversity of this fungal group in Guizhou was relatively high. Thus, there was a need for a more comprehensive investigation.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This research is supported by the following projects: National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31972222, 31660011), Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (111 Program, D20023), Talent project of Guizhou Science and Technology Cooperation Platform ([2017]5788-5, [2019]5641, [2019]13), Guizhou Science, Technology Department of International Cooperation Base project ([2018]5806), the project of Guizhou Provincial Education Department ([2021]001) and Guizhou Science and Technology Innovation Talent Team Project ([2020]5001).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: YH. Data curation: SF. Formal analysis: NNW. Funding acquisition: YW, YL. Investigation: ET. Methodology: JES. Supervision: YW. Writing - original draft: SF.

Author ORCIDs

Shamin Fu https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2829-7967

Jing-E Sun https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5226-5743

Entaj Tarafder https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3680-3433

Nalin N. Wijayawardene https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-5498

Yong Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3831-2117

Yan Li https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2227-008X

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Chen YY, Dissanayake AJ, Liu ZY, Liu JK (2020) Additions to Karst Fungi 4: Botryosphaeria spp. associated with woody hosts in Guizhou province, China including B. guttulata sp. nov. Phytotaxa 454(3): 186–202. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.454.3.2
  • Crous PW, Braun U, Hunter GC, Wingfield MJ, Verkley GJM, Shin HD, Nakashima C, Groenewald JZ (2013) Phylogenetic lineages in Pseudocercospora. Studies in Mycology 75: 37–114. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim0005
  • Goidànich G (1934) Un nouvo genere di Demaziacee amerospore. Malpighia 33: 1–7.
  • Hernández-Restrepo M, Decock CA, Costa MM, Crous PW (2022) Phylogeny and taxonomy of Circinotrichum, Gyrothrix, Vermiculariopsiella and other setose hyphomycetes. Persoonia 49(1): 99–135. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2022.49.03
  • Hyde KD, Jones EBG, Liu J, Ariyawansa H, Boehm E, Boonmee S, Braun U, Chomnunti P, Crous PW, Dai D, Diederich P, Dissanayake A, Doilom M, Doveri F, Hongsanan S, Jayawardena R, Lawrey JD, Li Y, Liu Y, Lücking R, Monkai J, Muggia L, Nelsen MP, Pang K, Phookamsak R, Senanayake IC, Shearer CA, Suetrong S, Tanaka K, Thambugala KM, Wijayawardene NN, Wikee S, Wu H, Zhang Y, Aguirre-Hudson B, Alias SA, Aptroot A, Bahkali AH, Bezerra JL, Bhat DJ, Camporesi E, Chukeatirote E, Gueidan C, Hawksworth DL, Hirayama K, De Hoog S, Kang J, Knudsen K, Li W, Li X, Liu Z, Mapook A, Mckenzie EHC, Miller AN, Mortimer PE, Phillips AJL, Raja HA, Scheuer C, Schumm F, Taylor JE, Tian Q, Tibpromma S, Wanasinghe DN, Wang Y, Xu J, Yacharoen S, Yan J, Zhang M (2013) Families of Dothideomycetes. Fungal Diversity 63(1): 1–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0263-4
  • Hyde KD, Hongsanan S, Jeewon R, Bhat JD, McKenzie CHE, Jones GBE, Phookamsak R, Ariyawansa HA, Boonmee S, Zhao Q, Abdel-Aziz FA, Abdel-Wahab MA, Banmai S, Chomnunti P, Cui B, Daranagama DA, Das K, Dayarathne MC, de Silva NI, Dissanayake AJ, Doilom M, Ekanayaka AH, Gibertoni TB, Góes-Neto A, Huang S, Jayasiri SC, Jayawardena RS, Konta S, Lee HB, Li W, Lin C, Liu J, Lu Y, Luo Z, Manawasinghe IS, Manimohan P, Mapook A, Niskanen T, Norphanphoun C, Papizadeh M, Perera RH, Phukhamsakda C, Richter C, de Santiago ALCM, Drechsler-Santos ER, Senanayake IC, Tanaka K, Tennakoon TMDS, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Tibpromma S, Thongbai B, Vizzini A, Wanasinghe DN, Wijayawardene NN, Wu H, Yang J, Zeng X, Zhang H, Zhang J, Bulgakov TS, Camporesi E, Bahkali AH, Amoozegar MA, Araujo-Neta LS, Ammirati JF, Baghela A, Bhatt RP, Bojantchev D, Buyck B, Da Silva GA, de Lima CLF, de Oliveira RJV, de Souza CAF, Dai Y, Dima B, Duong TT, Ercole E, Mafalda-Freire F, Ghosh A, Hashimoto A, Kamolhan S, Kang J, Karunarathna SC, Kirk PM, Kytövuori I, Lantieri A, Liimatainen K, Liu Z, Liu X, Lücking R, Medardi G, Mortimer PE, Nguyen TTT, Promputtha I, Raj KNA, Reck MA, Lumyong S, Shahzadeh-Fazeli SA, Stadler M, Soudi MR, Su H, Takahashi T, Tangthirasunun N, Uniyal P, Wang Y, Wen T, Xu J, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Zhou J, Zhu L (2016) Fungal diversity notes 367–490: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 80: 1–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0373-x
  • Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD (2019) MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence a2gnment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20(4): 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108
  • Li GQ, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ, Chen SF (2020) Variation in Botryosphaeriaceae from Eucalyptus plantations in Yunnan Province in southwestern China across a climatic gradient. IMA Fungus 11(1): 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-020-00043-x
  • Ma Y, Li T, Xu X, Ji Y, Jiang X, Shi X, Wang B (2021) Investigation of volatile compounds, microbial succession, and their relation during spontaneous fermentation of Petit Manseng. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 717387. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.717387
  • Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Senanayake IC, Rathnayake AR, Marasinghe DS, Calabon MS, Gentekaki E, Lee HB, Hurdeal VG, Pem D, Dissanayake LS, Wijesinghe SN, Bundhun D, Nguyen TT, Goonasekara ID, Abeywickrama PD, Bhunjun CS, Jayawardena RS, Wanasinghe DN, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, Xiang MM (2020) Morphological approaches in studying fungi: Collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 11(1): 2678–2754. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20
  • Spatafora J, Sung G, Johnson D, Hesse C, O’Rourke B, Serdani M, Spotts R, Lutzoni F, Valerie H, Miadlikowska J, Reeb V, Gueidan C, Fraker E, Lumbsch T, Lücking R, Schmitt I, Hosaka K, Aptroot A, Roux C, Schoch C (2006) A five-gene phylogeny of Pezizomycotina. Mycologia 98(6): 1018–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832630
  • Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0 b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, UK.
  • Thambugala MK, Daranagama AD, Phillips LJA, Bulgakov TS, Bhat DJ, Camporesi D, Bahkali AH, Eungwanichayapant PD, Liu ZY, Hyde KD (2017) Microfungi on Tamarix. Fungal Diversity 82(1): 239–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0371-z
  • Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen LT, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2016) W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 44(W1): W232–W235. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256
  • Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R (2011) Sequence Matrix: Concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27(2): 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00329.x
  • Valenzuela-Lopez N, Cano-Lira J, Guarro J, Sutton DA, Wiederhold N, Crous PW, Stchigel AM (2018) Coelomycetous Dothideomycetes with emphasis on the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae. Studies in Mycology 90(1): 1–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2017.11.003
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172(8): 4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
  • Vu D, Groenewald M, Vries MD, Stielow B, Eberhardt U, Al-Hatmi A, Groenewald JZ, Cardinali G, Houbraken J, Boekhout T, Crous PW, Robert V, Verkley GJM (2019) Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Studies in Mycology 92(1): 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2018.05.001
  • Wanasinghe DN (2018) Taxonomic circumscription and phylogenetics of novel Didymellaceous taxa with brown muriform spores. Studies in Fungi 3(1): 152–175. https://doi.org/10.5943/sif/3/1/17
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innes MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (Eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
  • Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Rajeshkumar KC, Hawksworth DL, Madrid H, Kirk PM, Braun U, Singh RV, Crous PW, Kukwa M, Lücking R, Kurtzman CP, Yurkov A, Haelewaters D, Aptroot A, Lumbsch HT, Timdal E, Ertz D, Etayo J, Phillips AJL, Groenewald JZ, Papizadeh M, Selbmann L, Dayarathne MC, Weerakoon G, Jones EBG, Suetrong S, Tian Q, Castañeda-Ruiz RF, Bahkali AH, Pang K-L, Tanaka K, Dai DQ, Sakayaroj J, Hujslová M, Lombard L, Shenoy BD, Suija A, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Thambugala KM, Wanasinghe DN, Sharma BO, Gaikwad S, Pandit G, Zucconi L, Onofri S, Egidi E, Raja HA, Kodsueb R, Cáceres MES, Pérez-Ortega S, Fiuza PO, Monteiro JS, Vasilyeva LN, Shivas RG, Prieto M, Wedin M, Olariaga I, Lateef AA, Agrawal Y, Fazeli SAS, Amoozegar MA, Zhao GZ, Pfliegler WP, Sharma G, Oset M, Abdel-Wahab MA, Takamatsu S, Bensch K, de Silva NI, De Kesel A, Karunarathna A, Boonmee S, Pfister DH, Lu Y-Z, Luo Z-L, Boonyuen N, Daranagama DA, Senanayake IC, Jayasiri SC, Samarakoon MC, Zeng X-Y, Doilom M, Quijada L, Rampadarath S, Heredia G, Dissanayake AJ, Jayawardana RS, Perera RH, Tang LZ, Phukhamsakda C, Hernández-Restrepo M, Ma X, Tibpromma S, Gusmao LFP, Weerahewa D, Karunarathna SC (2017) Notes for genera: Ascomycota. Fungal Diversity 86(1): 1–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-017-0386-0
  • Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Dai DQ, Sanchez-Garcia M, Tomio Goto B, Saxena RK, Erdoğdu M, Selcuk F (2022a) Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa – 2021. Mycosphere 13(1): 53–453. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/2
  • Wijayawardene NN, Phillips AJL, Pereira DS, Dai DQ, Aptroot A, Monteiro JS, Druzhinina IS, Cai F, Fan X, Selbmann L, Coleine C, Castañeda-Ruiz R, Kukwa M, Flakus A, Oliveira Fiuza P, Kirk PM, Rajesh Kumar KC, Ileperuma Arachchi IS, Suwannarach N, Thines M (2022b) Forecasting the number of species of asexually reproducing fungi (Ascomycota and Basidiomycota). Fungal Diversity 114(1): 463–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-022-00500-5
  • Wilson A, Cuddy WS, Park RF, Harm GFS, Priest MJ, Bailey J, Moffitt MC (2020) Investigating hyperparasites as potential biological control agents of rust pathogens on cereal crops. Australasian Plant Pathology 49(3): 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-020-00695-8
  • Woudenberg JHC, Aveskamp MM, Gruyter J, Spiers AG, Crous PW (2009) Multiple Didymella teleomorphs are linked to the Phoma clematidina morphotype. Persoonia 22(1): 56–62. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158509X427808
login to comment