Research Article
Print
Research Article
Morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses revealed four new wood inhabiting fungi (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) in Xizang Autonomous Region, China
expand article infoHong-Min Zhou, Xun-Chi Zhang, Jie-Ting Li§, Fang Wu|, Chang-Lin Zhao
‡ Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China
§ Tibet Agricultural & Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi, China
| Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
Open Access

Abstract

Four new fungi from Xizang in southwest China, Calocera ramaria, Ceraceomyces rhizomorphus, Leptosporomyces linzhiensis, and Ramaria xizangensis are described and illustrated based on the morphological and molecular evidence. Calocera ramaria is characterized by the ramal and bright orange basidiomata, a monomitic hyphal system with simple septa generative hyphae, usually 4-septate basidiospores; Ceraceomyces rhizomorphus is characterized by the cream to yellowish basidiomata with rhizomorphs, cylindrical basidiospores; Leptosporomyces linzhiensis is characterized by white with pink basidiomata, cylindrical to oblong ellipsoid basidiospores; Ramaria xizangensis is characterized by flesh pink basidiomata, branched dichotomously in 4–5 ranks, a monomitic hyphal system with clamped generative hyphae, ellipsoid to cylindrical and densely warted basidiospores.

Key words

Molecular systematic, phylogenetic analysis, taxonomy, wood-decaying fungi

Introduction

The fruiting bodies of Basidiomycota exhibit complex forms, such as gilled, poroid, toothed, coralloid basidiomata. Numerous taxonomists have endeavored to construct a stable classification system based on these characters (Gäumann 1953). Recently, the analysis of DNA sequences has emerged as a common method for deducing fungal phylogenies and enhancing higher classification frameworks through the integration of genetic traits (Cui et al. 2019; Wijayawardene et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2023).

The abundance of biodiversity in Abies forests can be attributed to the plentiful presence of humus and mycorrhizal fungi, which foster an optimal environment for the proliferation of the macrofungal species. Information regarding the fungal diversity in Abies communities is scattered over a range of publications (Ryvarden and Gilbertson 1993; Dai 2022). Ceraceomyces Jülich, a small genus characterized by yellow rhizomorphic basidiomata, was established by Jülich based on the taxon C. tessulatus (Cooke) Jülich (Jülich 1972). This genus, originally from North America, features annual, resupinate, pellicular basidiomata with a smooth or merulioid hymenial surface, a monomitic hyphal system, narrowly clavate basidia, and subglobose, narrowly ovate, ellipsoid to cylindrical basidiospores (Chikowski et al. 2016). Phylogenetic studies revealed that Ceraceomyces was polyphyletic, comprising three distinct groups. The section of Corticium tessulatum Cooke belonged to Polyporales, and Ceraceomyces serpens (Tode) Ginns and C. eludens K.H. Larss. were part of phlebioid clade (Larsson et al. 2004). A recent study indicated that the type species, Corticium tessulatum is classified under the order Amylocorticiales (Binder et al. 2010; Chikowski et al. 2016), as well as species, C. yunnanensis Qi Yuan & C.L. Zhao and C. borealis (Romell) J. Erikss. & Ryvarden (Yuan et al. 2023). Currently, eleven species are recognized in the genus Ceraceomyces, including C. cystidiatus (J. Erikss. & Hjortstam) Hjortstam, C. eludens, C. microsporus K.H. Larss. and C. sublaevis (Bres.) Jülich were accepted in the genus. A genus, Crystallicutis El-Gharabawy, Leal-Dutra & G.W. Griff. was derived from Ceraceomyces based on the crystals in the hymenium and subiculum of the basidiomata, which includes the brown-rot species C. serpens (El-Gharabawy et al. 2021). Both species C. sulphurinus and C. violascens (Fr.) Jscens were recorded in Ceraceomyces, are considered congeneric with Rhizochaete Gresl., Nakasone & Rajchenb. due to the characteristics like the rhizomorphic margin and the purple reaction in KOH.

Calocera (Fr.) Fr. is known for its distinctive characteristics, stipitate, fasciculate or scattered, gelatinous basidiomata, dendroid or staghorn-like, subclavate to clavate basidia and probasidia, as well as cylindrical to reniform, septate or non-septate basidiospores (Fisher 1931; Lowy 1971; Peng et al. 1992; Wu et al. 2011; Shirouzu et al. 2017). Recent phylogenetic analyses of the class Dacrymycetes demonstrated that Calocera was polyphyletic and species in the genus are scattered throughout the family Dacrymycetaceae together with most of the species of Dacrymyces Nees (1817: 89) as well as a few species from other genera such as Dacryopinax G.W. Martin (1948: 116) and Femsjonia Fr. (Shirouzu et al. 2007; Zamora and Ekman 2020).

The genus Leptosporomyces Jülich is characterized by the resupinate basidiomata, white yellow and smooth hymenial surface, a monomitic hyphal system with clamped connections, and thin-wall, smooth, acyanophilous basidiospores. Recent research has indicated that Leptosporomyces was polyphyletic, with two taxa, L. galzinii (Bourdot) Jülich and L. raunkiaeri (M.P. Christ.) Jülich, grouped in the order Atheliales, while L. septentrionalis (J. Erikss.) Krieglst. was placed in the order Amylocorticiales (Larsson 2007; Hodkinson et al. 2014; Sulistyo et al. 2021). The generic delimitation of Fibulomyces Jülich and Leptosporomyces remains controversial, with both being indistinguishable in phylogenetic and morphological analyses, leading to the former being considered as a synonym of the latter (Bernicchia and Gorjón 2010).

Ramaria Fr. ex Bonord. is a widely distributed non-gilled Basidiomycete genus (Marr and Stuntz 1973; Petersen 1981; Humpert et al. 2001). The genus is recognized by branched basidiomata, mono- to dimitic hyphal systems with clamped or simple-septate generative hyphae, and smooth to echinulate, verrucose-reticulate or striate ornamentation basidiospores (Corner 1950; Marr and Stuntz 1973; Petersen 1981; Humpert et al. 2001). The genus has been classified into four subgenera, namely R. subg. Ramaria, R. subg. Laeticolora Marr & D.E. Stuntz, R. subg. Lentoramaria Corner, and R. subg. Echinoramaria Corner (Marr and Stuntz 1973; Humpert et al. 2001; Exeter et al. 2006; Knudson 2012; Hanif et al. 2019). Initially, Ramaria was treated as a subgenus within Clavaria (Coker 1923; Doty 1944) until Corner (1970) elevated it to genus rank. Studies based on the morphological and molecular data agree on the paraphyletic state of Ramaria (Humpert et al. 2001; Hosaka et al. 2006; Giachini et al. 2010).

In the present paper, species from four genera are collected from Xizang under forest of Abies, and the phylogenetic relationships of four taxa are still unclear. Thus, to explore the diversity and taxonomic status with different characters for those taxa will be significant for macrofungi in Xizang, and the taxonomy and phylogeny analysis show that they are new to science.

Material and method

The specimens were collected from Xizang which were deposited in the herbarium of the Southwest Forestry University (SWFC), Kunming, Yunnan Province, China. Samples were photographed when fresh in the field, and their habitats were recorded. Microscopic structures were discussed by Zhao et al. (2023). Special color terms were set by Anonymous (1969) and Petersen (1996). A Nikon Digital Sight DS-L3 or Leica ICC50 HD camera (magnification ×1,000) was used to exam hand-cut sections of basidiomata, which were first treated with 5% KOH for a few minutes and then with 1% phloxine B (C20H4Br4Cl2K2O5). At least 30 basidiospores of each species were examined. The values were expressed as a mean with 5% of the measurements excluded from each end of the range, given in parentheses. Stalks were excluded for basidia measurement, and the hilar appendages were excluded for basidiospore measurement.

DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing

The CTAB rapid plant genome extraction kit-DN14 (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing) was used to obtain DNA from dried specimens and PCR was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions with some modifications (Yang et al. 2023). ITS were amplified using the primer pairs ITS5/ITS4 (White et al. 1990). The PCR procedure for ITS was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 40 s, 54 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 1 min; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR procedure for LSU was as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1.5 min; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. All newly generated sequences were submitted to GenBank and are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Taxa information and the sequences used in this study. *Newly generated sequences for this study.

Species Locality Voucher ITS LSU
Amyloathelia crassiuscula Sweden GB/K169-796 DQ144610
Amylocorticium cebennense USA HHB-2808 GU187505 GU187561
Amylocorticium subincarnatum Sweden GB/AS-95 AY463377 AY586628
Amylocorticium subsulphureum USA HHB-13817 GU187506 GU187562
Anomoporia bombycina USA CFMR L-6240 GU187508 GU187611
Anomoporia vesiculosa China Dai 22795 ON413718 ON413720
Athelia abscondita USA Goyette 633 OP877120 OP902328
Athelopsis subinconspicua Sweden GB0058732 LR694197 LR694174
Bondarzewia occidentalis Canada AFTOL-ID 452 DQ200923 DQ234539
Byssocorticium caeruleum Canada RS 09400 (H) NR_121454
Calocera bambusicola China Wu 9910-12 FJ195751
Calocera cornea Sweden UPS F 940775 MN595627 MN595627
Calocera cornea Unknown AFTOL ID 438 AY789083 AY701526
Calocera cornea Sweden UPS F 940774 MN595626 MN595626
Calocera cornea Canada CBS 124.84 AB712437 AB472738
Calocera guepinioides New Zealand PDD 107969 LC131411 LC131370
Calocera guepinioides New Zealand PDD 107981 LC131412 LC131371
Calocera guepinioides New Zealand PDD 105005 LC131407 LC131366
Calocera guepinioides New Zealand PDD 107874 LC131409 LC131368
Calocera guepinioides New Zealand PDD 105033 LC131408 LC131367
Calocera guepinioides New Zealand PDD 107929 LC131410 LC131369
Calocera lutea New Zealand PDD 107841 LC131413 LC131372
Calocera lutea New Zealand PDD 107842 LC131414 LC131373
Calocera palmata New Zealand PDD 107830 LC131415 LC131374
Calocera palmata New Zealand PDD 107925 LC131416 LC131375
Calocera palmata Japan CBS 127.51 MH856777 MH868295
Calocera ramaria China CLZhao 31166 PP399147 PP862915
Calocera sinensis China MHHNU30743 MK167408
Calocera sinensis China Wu 0505-3 FJ195753
Calocera sinensis China Wu 0703-6 FJ195754
Calocera sinensis China JCH 070726 FJ195755
Calocera tibetica China Dai 20171 MW549777 MW750403
Calocera tibetica China Dai 20178 MW549778 MW750404
Calocera viscosa s.lat. Sweden UPS F-940773 MN595628 MN595628
Calocera viscosa s.lat. Germany FTOL ID1679 DQ520102 DQ520102
Ceraceomyces americanus USA FP-102188 KP135409 KP135277
Ceraceomyces atlanticus Brazil URM 85888 NR_153926 NG_060427
Ceraceomyces atlanticus China M67 OR766067 KX685874
Ceraceomyces borealis Sweden KHL 8432 EU118610
Ceraceomyces eludens Sweden JS 27108 AF090879
Ceraceomyces eludens Sweden JS 22780 AF090877
Ceraceomyces eludens United Kingdom KM 194563 OR907143
Ceraceomyces microsporus USA UC 2023077 KP814418
Ceraceomyces microsporus Sweden JS 27153 AF090873
Ceraceomyces rhizomorphus China CLZhao 31154 PP399151
Ceraceomyces rhizomorphus China CLZhao 31161 PP399148
Ceraceomyces rhizomorphus China CLZhao 31188 PP399149 PP862917
Ceraceomyces rhizomorphus China CLZhao 31197 PP399150 PP862916
Ceraceomyces sublaevis USA FP-101245-Sp KP135029 GU187607
Ceraceomyces tessulatus USA MPN 152885038 OR680647
Ceraceomyces tessulatus Sweden KHL 16429 KU518951
Ceraceomyces yunnanensis China CLZhao 18992 OQ132519 OQ147003
Clavariadelphus amplus China HMAS 250466 MK705858 MK704448
Coniophora marmorata Belgium MUCL: 31667 GU187515 GU187571
Dacrymyces longistipitatus New Zealand PDD 107996 LC131425 LC131386
Dacrymyces pachysporus New Zealand PDD 105004 LC131429 LC131392
Dacrymyces parastenosporus New Zealand PDD104960 LC131431 LC131394
Dacrymyces stillatus Sweden UPS F-939814 MN595676 MN595676
Dacrymyces subalpinus Japan TUFC12834 AB712465 AB299060
Dacryonaema macnabbii Sweden UPS F-940949 MN595650 MN595650
Dacryonaema macnabbii Sweden UPS F-940951 MN595651 MN595651
Dacryonaema macrosporum Norway O 160045 MN595659 MN595659
Dacryonaema macrosporum Finland UPS F-940998 MN595660 MN595660
Dacryonaema rufum Sweden UPS F-941003 MN595645 MN595645
Dacryonaema rufum Sweden UPS F-941005 MN595646 MN595646
Dendrdacrys brasiliense Brazil INPA:241458 AB744230 AB723514
Dendrdacrys dendrocalami Japan TUFC 13914 AB712453 AB712428
Fibulomyces mutabilis Germany HG-B 5753 (GB) GQ162817
Ganoderma resinaceum Unknown C45 KX371982 KX372027
Gautieria parksiana USA SNF 236 USA AF377059
Gloeocantharellus neoechinosporus China GDGM 75321 MK358820 MK358815
Go. ludovicianus USA TFB 14476 KJ655570 KJ655580
Gomphus clavatus Spain MA-Fungi 48085 AJ292292
Hypochniciellum subillaqueatum Sweden KHL 8493 AY463431 AY586679
Hypochniciellum subillaqueatum UK KM165142 MZ159402
Kavinia himantia USA CFMR: DLL2011-079 KJ140598
Kavinia alboviridis USA CFMR: DLL2011-131 KJ140634
Lentaria micheneri USA RRD6 (TENN) MF773634
Lactarius sp. New Zealand PDD:113066 MW683864 MW683691
Lentaria byssiseda USA TENN 61159 FJ596788
Leptosporomyces fuscostratus USA UC 2022884 KP814350
Leptosporomyces fuscostratus Unknown DK 16_251 OL436970
Leptosporomyces galzinii Sweden GB 0107211 LR694202 LR694180
Leptosporomyces galzinii USA UC 2023126 KP814291
Leptosporomyces linzhiensis China CLZhao 31174 PP399152 PP862922
Leptosporomyces linzhiensis China CLZhao 31183 PP399153 PP862918
Leptosporomyces linzhiensis China CLZhao 31187 PP399154
Leptosporomyces linzhiensis China CLZhao 31190 PP399155
Leptosporomyces raunkiaeri USA UC 2023053 KP814293
Leptosporomyces raunkiaeri USA CFMR: HHB-7628 GU187528 GU187588
Leptosporomyces septentrionalis USA UC 2023047 KP814348
Leptosporomyces septentrionalis Sweden GB 0090937 LR694203 LR694181
Leptosporomyces septentrionalis Norway JS 16122 GU187497
Lobulicium occultum Sweden KHL13496b MT340827
Mythicomyces corneipes Unknown AFTOL-972 DQ404393 AY745707
Phaeoclavulina flaccida Italy AMB n. 17671 MK796107 MK796156
Phlebiella christiansenii Finland KHL 11689 EU118659
Phlebiella vaga Sweden KHL 11065 EU118660 EU118661
Piloderma fallax Finland CFMR: S-12 GU187535
Plicaturopsis crispa China LWZ 20201017-11 ON897938 ON885398
Plicaturopsis crispa Brazil URM 85888 NR_153926 NG_060427
Ramaria abietina USA u066 KY510818
Ramaria acrisiccescens USA OSC 112057 KY354738 KY354711
Ramaria admiratia USA TENN: 69114 NR_137862 NG_059504
Ramaria amyloidea USA OSC 69891 EU837196 KP637036
Ramaria apiculata var. brunnea USA CBS:149.74 MH860840 MH872577
Ramaria araiospora Germany OSC 108707 EU846298
Ramaria aurantiisiccescens USA OSC 104868 EU837197
Ramaria aurea Italy AMB 18352 MN637783 MN637796
Ramaria botrytis Italy AMB n. 18201 NR_189799 NG_241889
Ramaria botrytis Argentina GM 19044 OP177707 OP177871
Ramaria botrytis USA snf213 AF377055
Ramaria botrytis f. musicolor Italy ZT Myc 57160 KY626144
Ramaria botrytis var. aurantiiramosa USA OSC 140667 JX310410
Ramaria botrytis var. aurantiiramosa USA WTU-F-043053 KX574471
Ramaria celerivirescens USA OSC 140471 JX310392 JX269125
Ramaria claviramulata USA WTU-F-043055 KX574472 KX671009
Ramaria conjunctipes USA OSC: 110613 KC346861
Ramaria coulterae USA OSC 69929 EU669320 EU669320
Ramaria dendrophora Argentina GM 20020 OP177716 OP177880
Ramaria dendrophora Argentina GM 19094 OP177715 OP177879
Ramaria fennica Italy AMB n. 17522 MK682678
Ramaria flavescens Italy AMB 17404 KY354743
Ramaria flavescens Italy AMB 17404 MK493036
Ramaria flava Italy AMB 17393 MK493035
Ramaria flavinedulis Argentina GM 19056 OP177717 OP177881
Ramaria flavinedulis Argentina GM 19035 OP177720 OP177884
Ramaria flavobrunnescens var. aromatica USA AGK 059 JQ408240
Ramaria foetida USA AGK 058 JQ408239 JQ408239
Ramaria formosa USA OSC1064203 EU525994
Ramaria fumosiavellanea USA WTU-F-063048 MK169345
Ramaria gelatiniaurantia USA OSC 65737 KP658144
Ramaria inedulis Chile 12648 OP177723 OP177887
Ramaria inedulis Argentina GM 19047 OP177722 OP177886
Ramaria largentii USA OSC 67012 KP658130 KP637058
Ramaria luteovernalis Italy MCVE 28637 NR_155720 KT357477
Ramaria maculatipes USA OSC 112051 KY354749 KY354721
Ramaria magnipes USA WTU-F-063057 MK169351 MK493050
Ramaria myceliosa USA AGK 035 JQ408230
Ramaria obtusissima USA TFB 14473 KJ655554 KJ655575
Ramaria patagonica Argentina 403 OP177710 OP177874
Ramaria patagonica Argentina GM 19106 OP177713 OP177877
Ramaria pseudoflava Italy AMB 17392 MK493046
Ramaria rasilisporoides Pakistan MH-2013 MG760613
Ramaria rasilisporoides USA WTU-F-043029 MK169346
Ramaria rubella USA OSC 115946 EU669317 EU669343
Ramaria rubella f. rubella USA AGK 049 JQ408236
Ramaria rubribrunnescens USA OSC 119676 EU652352 EU652387
Ramaria rubribrunnescens USA OSC 66051 KY354750 KY354722
Ramaria sandaracina var. sandaracina Canada UBC F28386 KP454028
Ramaria sp. India KD-14-006 KT824242
Ramaria stricta Germany CBS 165.48 MH856299
Ramaria stricta var. concolor USA AGK 011 JQ408221
Ramaria stuntzii USA OSC 73315 KP658122 KP637048
Ramaria subbotrytis Spain MA-Fungi 48088 AJ408361
Ramaria subtilis Spain MA-Fungi 48055 AF442098
Ramaria suecica USA OSC 115933 KP658148 KP637079
Ramaria testaceoflava USA OSC 107885 KP658128 AY586708
Ramaria verlotensis USA WTU-F-063047 KX574480 KX671016
Ramaria xizangensis China CLZhao 31169 PP399156 PP862919
Ramaria xizangensis China CLZhao 31180 PP399157 PP862920
Ramaria xizangensis China CLZhao 31204 PP399158 PP862921
Ramaria formosa Italy AMB 18529 MT055910 MT053203
Ramaricium polyporoideum USA TENN: 065654 MF992160 MF992160
Stereopsis vitellina Sweden F 703241 LR694211 LR694189
Turbinellus floccosus USA MO 285170 MN319564 MN319563
Unilacryma unispora Sweden UPS F 941268 MN595672 MN595672
Unilacryma unispora Sweden UPS F 941277 MN595665 MN593500
Xenasmatella ardosiaca Costa Rica KHL 12928 EU118658
Xenasmatella ardosiaca USA CBS 126045 MH864060 MH875515

Sequences generated for this study were aligned, with additional sequences downloaded from GenBank. Sequences were aligned using MAFFT v.7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/), adjusting the direction of nucleotide sequences according to the first sequence (accurate enough for most cases), and selecting the G-INS-i iterative refinement method (Katoh et al. 2019). Alignments were manually adjusted to maximize alignment and minimize gaps with BioEdit v.7.0.9 (Hall 1999). A dataset of concatenated ITS and LSU sequences was used to determine the phylogenetic position of the new species. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was performed using the CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al. 2010) based on the dataset using the RA × ML-HPC BlackBox tool, with setting RA × ML halt bootstrapping automatically and 0.25 for maximum hours and obtaining the best tree using ML search. Other parameters in ML analysis used default settings, and statistical support values were obtained using nonparametric bootstrapping with 1,000 replicates. Bayesian inference (BI) analysis based on the dataset was performed using MrBayes v.3.2.6 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2012). The best substitution model for the dataset was selected by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) using a Bayesian information criterion, and the model was used for Bayesian analysis. Four Markov chains were run from random starting trees. Trees were sampled every 1,000th generation. The first 25% of sampled trees were discarded as burn-in, whereas other trees were used to construct a 50% majority consensus tree and for calculating Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPPs). The aligned sequences were deposited in TreeBase (https://www.treebase.org/treebase-web/home.html; submission ID 31437).

Branches of the consensus tree that received bootstrap support for ML were greater than or equal to 75%, Bayesian posterior probabilities more than 0.9, respectively.

Result

The Phylogeny of Calocera

BI analysis yielded a similar topology to MP and ML analysis. Only the MP tree is provided here (Fig. 1). Branches that received bootstrap support for ML (ML-BS), and BI (BPP) greater than or equal to 75% (MP-BS and ML-BS) and 0.90 (BPP) were considered as significantly supported, respectively. The ITS and LSU dataset contains sequences from 26 fungal specimens representing twelve Calocera taxa. The average SD of split frequencies in BI analyses is 0.005504 (BI). The phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) reveals the new species has close relationship with C. tibetica, sister to C. viscosa and C. cornea.

Figure 1. 

Phylogeny of species in Calocera generated by maximum likelihood based on ITS+LSU sequence data. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap ≥ 75% and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90, respectively. New species are in bold.

The Phylogeny of Ceraceomyces

The dataset included ITS and LSU from 29 samples representing 22 taxa. The best model for the concatenated ITS+LSU dataset estimated and applied for BI analysis was “GTR+I+G4”, datatype = DNA, nucmodel = 4by4, lset nst = 6, rates = invgamma; state frequencies had a Dirichlet prior (1,1,1,1), and the distribution was approximated using four categories. BI analysis yielded a similar topology to ML analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies of 0.006593. The ML tree was provided (Fig. 2). Branches that received bootstrap support for ML and BI ≥ 70%, and 0.75 were considered significantly supported, respectively.

Figure 2. 

Phylogeny of species in Ceraceomyces generated by maximum likelihood based on ITS+LSU sequence data. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap ≥ 75% and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90, respectively. New species are in bold.

The analysis reveals four clades (Fig. 2), in which three European species C. eludens, C. microsporus, C. sublaevis clustered together and Rhizochaete americanus (Nakasone, C.R. Bergman & Burds.) Gresl., Nakasone & Rajchenb. The core clade formed by C. tessulatus and C. atlanticus, along with Hypochniciellum subillaqueatum (Litsch.) Hjortstam. Four specimens from China formed two lineages, namely Ceraceomyces rhizomorphus with C. yunnanensis, and were sister to C. borealis.

The Phylogeny of Leptosporomyces

BI analysis yielded a similar topology to MP and ML analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.008841. Only the MP tree is provided here (Fig. 3). Branches that received bootstrap support for ML (ML-BS), and BI (BPP) greater than or equal to 75% (MP-BS and ML-BS) and 0.90 (BPP) were considered as significantly supported, respectively. Four previously accepted species, L. galzinii, L. fuscostratus (Jülich) Krieglst., L. raunkiaeri, and L. mundus (H.S. Jacks. & Dearden) Jülich received strong support in three lineages. The new species L. linzhiensis had a close relationship with L. septentrionalis with full support.

Figure 3. 

Phylogeny of species in Leptosporomyces generated by maximum likelihood based on ITS+LSU sequence data. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap ≥ 75% and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90, respectively. New species are in bold.

The Phylogeny of Ramaria

BI analysis yielded a similar topology to MP and ML analysis. Only the MP tree is provided here (Fig. 4). Branches that received bootstrap support for ML (ML-BS), and BI (BPP) greater than or equal to 75% (MP-BS and ML-BS) and 0.90 (BPP) were considered as significantly supported, respectively. Four clades were obtained from our phylogenetic analysis, Ramaria sub. Laeticolora, Ramaria Sub. Ramaria, Ramaria Sub. Echinormaria and Ramaria sub. Lentoramaria. The species Ramaria xizangensis was grouped in Ramaria sub. Laeticolora along with R. amyloidea Marr & D.E. Stuntz, R. celerivescens Marr & D.E. Stuntz, and R. claviramulata Marr & D.E. Stuntz.

Figure 4. 

Phylogeny of species in the Ramaria generated by maximum likelihood based on ITS+LSU sequence data. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap ≥ 75% and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90, respectively. New species are in bold.

Taxonomy

Calocera ramaria C.L. Zhao & H.M. Zhou, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 852565
Figs 5, 6

Holotype

China, Xizang, Linzhi, Sejila Mountain National Forest Park, 29°64'N, 94°71'E, elev. 3852 m, gregarious on humus under Abies, 2 August 2023, CLZhao 31166 (SWFC).

Figure 5. 

Basidiomata and microscopic structures of Calocera ramaria (holotype, CLZhao 31166, holotype) A, B basidiomata C a section of hymenium D basidiospores E marginal hyphae F internal hyphae. Scale bars: 1 cm (A, B); 10 μm (C–F).

Etymology

Ramaria (Lat.): refers to the ramal basidiomata of the specimens.

Figure 6. 

Microscopic structures of Calocera ramaria (holotype, CLZhao 31166) a basidiospores b basidia with basidiospores. Scale bars: 5 μm (a); 10 μm (b).

Diagnosis

Differed from other species in having ramal basidiomata, septate hyphae, usually 4-septate basidiospores (9.2–11 × 3.9–4.4 μm).

Fruiting body

Basidiomata stipitate, gregarious, bright orange when fresh, orange brown when dry, gelatinous when soaked, corneous when dry, ramal, repeatedly branched, apically blunt, up to 6.2 cm high; stipe 0.7–1 mm in diam, become orange to reddish brown corneous when dry.

Internal features

Marginal hyphae hyaline, smooth, thin-walled, septate, simple or branched, without clamp connections, 4–5.5 μm in diam; internal hyphae hyaline, smooth or scabrous, thin- to slightly thick-walled, interwoven, with nodose-septa, without clamp connections, 2–3 μm in diam; hyphidia hyaline, smooth, thin-walled, with a simple septum at base, occasionally terminally branched; basidia hyaline, thin-walled, subclavate to clavate, without basal clamp connection, 23–31 × 2–4 μm; basidiospores hyaline, smooth, thin-walled, oblong-ellipsoid to navicular, straight or curved, apiculate, usually 4-septate when mature, occasionally 5-septate, (9.1–)9.2–11(–11.6) × (3.5–)3.9–4.4(–4.7) μm, L = 10.18 μm, W = 4.19 μm, Q = 2.43 (n = 30/1).

Ceraceomyces rhizomorphus C.L. Zhao & H.M. Zhou, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 852584
Figs 7, 8

Holotype

China, Xizang, Linzhi, Sejilashan National Forest Park, 29°64'N, 94°71'E, elev. 3848 m, on the fallen branch of Abies, 2 August 2023, CLZhao 31188 (SWFC).

Figure 7. 

Basidiomata of Ceraceomyces rhizomorphus A, C CLZhao 31188 (holotype) B, D CLZhao 31185.

Etymology

Rhizomorphus (Lat.): refers to the basidiomata with rhizomorphs.

Figure 8. 

Microscopic structures of Ceraceomyces rhizomorphus (holotype, CLZhao 31216) a basidiospores b basidia c basidioles d a section of hymenium. Scale bars: 5 μm (a); 10 μm (b–d).

Diagnosis

Differed from other species in having merulioid, cream to yellowish basidiomata, generative hyphae with clamp connections, cylindrical basidiospores (4.7–6.2 × 1.8–2.3 µm).

Fruiting body

Basidiomata resupinate, adnate, smooth to tuberculate when fresh, merulioid upon drying, without odor or taste when fresh, up to 6 cm long, 2 cm wide, 100–200 µm thick. Hymenial surface merulioid, cream to yellowish when fresh, turn to orange yellow upon drying. Margin sterile, white, with rhizomorphs.

Hyphal structure

Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, branched, interwoven, 3.5–7 µm in diameter, IKI–, CB–; tissues turn black in KOH.

Hymenium

Cystidia and cystidioles absent; basidia narrowly clavate to clavate, in a dense palisade, with 4 sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 16–19 × 3.5–4 µm; basidioles dominant, similar to basidia in shape, but slightly smaller.

Spores

Basidiospores cylindrical, with suprahilar depression, colorless, smooth, thin-walled, IKI–, CB–, (4.2–)4.7–6.2(–6.4) × (1.5–)1.8–2.3(–2.4) µm, L = 5.49 µm, W = 2.05 µm, Q = 2.66–2.68 (n = 60/2).

Additional specimens examined

(paratypes). China. Xizang, Linzhi, Sejila Mountain National Forest Park, 29°64'N, 94°71'E, elev. 3848 m, on the trunk of Abies, 2 August 2023, CLZhao 31153 (SWFC); CLZhao 31154 (SWFC); CLZhao 31161 (SWFC); CLZhao 31202 (SWFC); on the fallen branch of Abies, 2 August 2023, CLZhao 31184 (SWFC); CLZhao 31185 (SWFC); CLZhao 31197 (SWFC).

Leptosporomyces linzhiensis C.L. Zhao & H.M. Zhou, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 852585
Figs 9, 10

Holotype

China, Xizang, Linzhi, Sjilashan Forest Park, 29°64'N, 94°71'E, elev. 3848 m, on fallen trunk of Abies, 2 August 2023, CLZhao 31183 (SWFC).

Figure 9. 

Basidiomata of Leptosporomyces linzhiensis (holotype, CLZhao 31183). Scale bars: 1 cm (A); 1 mm (B).

Etymology

Linzhiensis (Lat.): refers to the locality (Xizang) of the type specimens.

Figure 10. 

Microscopic structures of Leptosporomyces linzhiensis (holotype, CLZhao 31183) a basidiospores b basidia c basidioles d A section of hymenium. Scale bars: 5 μm (a); 10 μm (b–d).

Diagnosis

Differed from other species in having white basidiomata, monomitic hyphal system, cylindrical to oblong ellipsoid basidiospores (3.8–4. × 1.7–2 µm).

Fruiting body

Basidiomata resupinate, athelioid, membranous upon drying, without odor or taste when fresh, up to 10 cm long, 4 cm wide, 200 µm thick. Hymenial surface smooth to cracked, white with pink tint when fresh, turning to yellowish cream upon drying. Margin sterile, white, fimbriate.

Hyphal structure

Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, branched, interwoven, 2–5 µm in diameter, IKI–, CB–; tissues turn black in KOH.

Hymenium

Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, colorless, thin-walled, branched, interwoven, 2–3.5 µm in diameter, IKI–, CB–. Basidia clavate, with 4 sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 11.5–13.5 × 3.2–3.8 µm.

Spores

Basidiospores cylindrical to oblong ellipsoid, colorless, smooth, thin-walled, IKI–, CB–, (3.5–)3.8–4.3(–4.7) × (1.7–)1.7–2(–2.3) µm, L = 4.02 µm, W = 1.88 µm, Q = 1.95–2.18 (n = 90/3).

Additional specimens examined

(paratypes). China, Xizang, Linzhi, Sjilashan Forest Park, 22°57'N, 103°42'E, elev. 2100 m, on fallen trunk of Abies, 2 August 2023, CLZhao 31174 (SWFC); on fallen trunk of Abies, 2 August 2023, CLZhao 31187 (SWFC); on fallen trunk of Abies, 2 August 2023, CLZhao 31190 (SWFC).

Ramaria xizangensis C.L. Zhao & H.M. Zhou, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 852586
Figs 11, 12

Holotype

China, Xizang, Linzhi, Sejila Mountain National Forest Park, 29°64'N, 94°71'E, elev. 3850 m, gregarious on the humus under Abies, 2 August 2023, CLZhao 31169 (SWFC).

Figure 11. 

Basidiomata of Ramaria xizangensis (holotype, CLZhao 31169). Scale bars: 1 cm (A, B).

Etymology

Xizangensis (Lat.): refers to the locality (Xizang) of the type specimens.

Figure 12. 

Microscopic structures of Ramaria xizangensis (CLZhao 31169, holotype) a basidiospores b basidia c a section of hymenium. Scale bars: 5 μm (a); 10 μm (b, c).

Diagnosis

Differed from other species in having flesh pink basidiomata, monomitic hyphal system, generative hyphae with clamp connections, ellipsoid to cylindrical, densely warted basidiospores (9.7–11.8 × 3.9–4.9 µm).

Fruiting body

Basidiomata solitary to gregarious, with 8 cm high × 6 cm wide at the widest point, repeat branched dichotomously in 4–5 ranks, flesh pink when fresh, become clay buff with dry; apices obtuse, orange yellow when fresh, becoming fuscous when dry. Stipe ≥ 3 cm high, compound to fasciculate in groups of 5, emerging from a common base, concolorous with the branches.

Hyphal structure

Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, branched, walls smooth and hyaline; basal stem with tramal hyphae 4–7 μm wide and inflated ones up to 10 μm, occasionally branched, thin-walled, parallel arranged, hyaline; tramal hyphae of branches 3–4 μm wide.

Hymenium

Hymenium all along the basidiomata. Basidia clavate, in a dense palisade, with 4 sterigmata and a basal clamp connection. Basidioles elongated clavate, smooth, hyaline, contents homogeneous, 23.5–34 × 6–7 μm.

Spores

Basidiospores ellipsoid to cylindrical, densely warted, with 1–2 several guttulae, IKI–, CB–, 9.7–11.8(–12.5) × (3.8–)3.9–4.9(–5.1) µm, L = 10.69 µm, W = 4.29 µm, Q = 2.49 (n = 30/1).

Additional specimens examined

(paratypes). China, Xizang, Linzhi, Sejila Mountain National Forest Park, 29°67'N, 94°74'E, elev. 3850 m, gregarious on the humus under Abies, 2 August 2023, CLZhao 31180 (SWFC); on ground in forest of Abies, 2 August 2023, CLZhao 31204 (SWFC).

Discussion

Wood decay fungi encompasses the vast group of aphyllophoroid fungi with corticioid, prioid or jelly form of basidiomata (Herter 1910). This classification has historically been used to define the different families of Basidiomycetes. However, molecular studies have revealed that many of these fungi are distributed across various orders within the Basidiomycetes, including the likes of Amylocorticiales, Atheliales, Dacrymycetales, and Gomphales (Kirk et al. 2018; Wei et al. 2022). As a result, further research is needed to elucidate the relationships and morphological variability of these taxa through phylogenetic analysis.

The Xizang Autonomous Region, situated in the southwest of China, is renowned as one of the most bio-diverse regions in the country. This is attributed to its complex topography and diverse ecosystems, making it a focal point for fungal biodiversity in China. Recently, studies focusing on fungal diversity and the ecology of Basidiomycota in Xizang were carried out (Ke 2016; Pubu et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2023). According to the study (Pubu et al. 2016), 1733 species were collected in Xizang. The fungal research indicated that Sejila Mountain National Forest Park is predominantly composed of spruce and fir trees, which provide an ideal habitat for a rich diversity of macrofungi species to flourish (Zhao and Li 1987). In our study, four species were found from Xizang, Calocera ramaria, Ceraceomyces rhizomorphus, Leptosporomyces linzhiensis, and Ramaria xizangensis.

Calocera is characterized by its yellow, gelatinous basidiomata, resembling Dacrymyces. However, Dacrymyces displays a broader range of basidiomata forms, including pulvinate, discoid, turbinate, spathulate, flabellate, and cylindrical shapes (Shirouzu et al. 2009; Fan et al. 2021), whereas Calocera exhibits branched, dendroid basidiomata. Our results have further confirmed that our newly discovered species features ramal basidiomata and clusters phylogenetically with Calocera species, placing it within the genus Calocera. In Xizang, two species have been identified, C. ramaria and C. tibetica, but the latter has wider basidiospores (5–6 µm vs. 3.9–4.4 µm, Fan et al. 2021). In our phylogenies, C. viscosa and C. cornea were related to C. ramaria (Fig. 1); however, C. viscosa has 1-septate mature basidiospores, and C. cornea differs from C. ramaria by its distinctly larger basidiospores (7–10 × 3–4.5 μm vs. 9.2–11 × 3.9–4.4 μm) with one septum (McNabb 1965; Shirouzu et al. 2009).

Previous research has highlighted the polyphyly of Ceraceomyces (Chikowski 2016; Yuan et al. 2023), and seven species are retained in Ceraceomyces. However, it is worth noting that authentic specimens and DNA data are lacking for Ceraceomyces species. Phylogenetically, C. rhizomorphus formed a sister group with C. yunnanensis and C. borealis, but C. yunnanensis has smaller basidiospores (3–4 × 1–1.5 µm vs. 4.7–6.2 × 1.8–2.3 µm, Yuan et al. 2023) and C. borealis has larger basidiospores (6–8 × 1.8–2 µm vs. 4.7–6.2 × 1.8–2.3 µm, Bernicchia and Gorjón 2010).

Ceraceomyces rhizomorphus and C. tessulatus had similar yellowish basidiomata with rhizomorphs when fresh, while C. tessulatus has ellipsoid and larger basidiospores (6–8 × 3.5–4.5 µm vs. 4.7–6.2 × 1.8–2.3 µm, Bernicchia and Gorjón 2010). Three known species, C. bizonatus, C. reidii, and C. simulans also distributed in Asia. However, C. bizonatus has shorter basidiospores (2.5–3.3 µm vs. 4.7–6.2 µm, Bernicchia and Gorjón 2010); C. reidii has larger basidiospores (11.5–15 × 4.5–6 µm vs. 4.7–6.2 × 1.8–2.3 µm, Bernicchia and Gorjón 2010); C. simulans has longer basidiospores (6–7 µm vs. 4.7–6.2 µm, Bernicchia and Gorjón 2010).

Leptosporomyces linzhiensis is similar to L. thindii in having white basidiomata and being distributed in Asia, but the latter has wider basidiospores (Prasher 2015). Leptosporomyces linzhiensis sisters to L. septentrionalis by its white basidiomata, and cylindrical basidiospores, but the latter has slightly shorter basidiospores (3–4 μm vs. 3.8–4.3 μm), and 2–4 basidia (Prasher 2015). Leptosporomyces linzhiensis is easily confused with L. roseus in, but the latter has shorter basidiospores (2–2.5 μm vs. 3.8–4.3 μm, Prasher 2015). Leptosporomyces fuscostratus has a broad distributional range in the northern hemisphere, but it has wider basidiospores (2–2.8 μm vs. 1.7–2 μm, Yurchenko and Wołkowycki 2022).

In our phylogeny, Ramaria is paraphyletic, which included four clades, R. sub. Laeticolora and R. sub. Lentoramaria, R. sub. Ramaria and R. sub. Echinormaria. Ramaria xizangensis was clustered in Ramaria sub. Laeticolora with Ramaria amyloidea, R. celerivirescens and R. claviramulata. However, R. celerivirescens has slightly wider basidiospores (4–6 µm vs. 3.9–4.9 µm, Marr and Stuntz 1973). R. claviramulata has cream to brownish white basidiomata. Ramaria xizangensis is similar to R. indoyunnaniana in having pink basidiomata and being distributed in Yunnan, but the latter has shorter basidiospores (7.2–8.3 µm vs. 9.7–11.8 µm, Petersen and Zang 1986).

According to our field inventory, the four Chinese new species were found in alpine zone near the Sejila Mountain, and the coniferous forest dominant by Abies at high altitude with cold and humid environments. Previously, numerous new species have been found in Southwest China (Dai 2022; Zhao et al. 2023), and the present paper confirms the fungal diversity is very rich in the montane forests of Southeast Xizang.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 32170004); the Highlevel Talents Program of Yunnan Province (YNQR-QNRC-2018-111); the Scientific Research Fund of Yunnan Provincial Department of Education (2024J0668); Forestry Innovation Programs of Southwest Forestry University (Grant No: LXXK-2023M07).

Author contributions

Data curation: ZHM, ZCL,WF. Formal analysis: ZXC. Methodology: ZHM, ZXC, LJT. Soft-ware: ZXC, LJT. Writing - original draft: ZHM, ZCL. Writing - review and editing: ZCL, WF.

Author ORCIDs

Hong-Min Zhou https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0724-5815

Xun-Chi Zhang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3887-0979

Fang Wu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1455-6486

Chang-Lin Zhao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8668-1075

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Anonymous (1969) Flora of British Fungi. Colour Identification Chart. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
  • Bao Y (2020) Mycoflora Biodiversity and Genetic Variation of Macrofungi in Alpine Meadow of Tibet. Northeast Normal University.
  • Bernicchia A, Gorjón SP (2010) Fungi Europaei 12. Corticiaceae s.l. Edizioni Candusso, Alassio, Italy, 1008 pp.
  • Binder M, Larsson KH, Matheny PB, Hibbett DS (2010) Amylocorticiales ord. nov. and Jaapiales ord. nov.: Early diverging clades of Agaricomycetidae dominated by corticioid forms. Mycologia 102(4): 865–880. https://doi.org/10.3852/09-288
  • Chikowski R, Larsson KH, Gibertoni TB (2016) Ceraceomyces atlanticus (Amylocorticiales, Basidiomycota), a new species from the Atlantic Rain Forest, Brazil. Phytotaxa 296(1): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.296.1.5
  • Coker WC (1923) The Clavarias of the United States and Canada. Chapel Hill, 209 pp.
  • Corner EJH (1950) A monograph of Clavaria and allied genera. Annals of Botany Memoirs 1: 1–740.
  • Cui BK, Li HJ, Ji X, Zhou JL, Song J, Si J, Yang ZL, Dai YC (2019) Species diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of Polyporaceae (Basidiomycota) in China. Fungal Diversity 97(1): 137–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00427-4
  • Doty MS (1944) Clavaria, the species known from Oregon and the Pacific Northwest.
  • El-Gharabawy HM, Leal-Dutra CA, Griffith GW (2021) Crystallicutis gen. nov. (Irpicaceae, Basidiomycota), including C. damiettensis sp. nov., found on Phoenix dactylifera (date palm) trunks in the Nile Delta of Egypt. Fungal Biology 125(6): 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2021.01.004
  • Exeter RL, Norvell L, Cazares E (2006) Ramaria of the Pacific Northwestern United States. United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management. Salem, Oregon USA, 156 pp.
  • Fisher MC (1931) A comparative morphological study of certain species of the Dacryomycetaceae. The Proceedings 38(1): 115–125.
  • Gäumann EA (1953) The Fungi: a description of their morphological features and evolutionary development, (Translated by Wynd FL). Hafner Publishing, New York and London, 420 pp.
  • Giachini AJ, Hosaka K, Nouhra E, Spatafora J, Trappe JM (2010) Phylogenetic relationships of the Gomphales based on nuc-25S-rDNA, mit-12S-rDNA, and mit-atp6-DNA combined sequences. Fungal Biology 114(2–3): 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2010.01.002
  • Hall TA (1999) Bioedit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
  • Hanif M, Khalid AN, Exeter RL (2019) Ramaria flavescentoides sp. nov. with clamped basidia from Pakistan. Mycotaxon 134: 399–406. https://doi.org/10.5248/134.399
  • Herter WGF (1910) Autobasidiomycetes. Kryptogamen-Flora der Mark Brandenburg 6: 1–192.
  • Hodkinson BP, Moncada B, Lücking R (2014) Lepidostromatales, a new order of lichenized fungi (Basidiomycota, Agaricomycetes), with two new genera, Ertzia and Sulzbacheromyces, and one new species, Lepidostroma winklerianum. Fungal Diversity 64(1): 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0267-0
  • Hosaka K, Bates ST, Beever RE, Castellano MA, Colgan W III, Dominguez LS, Trappe JM (2006) Molecular phylogenetics of the gomphoidphalloid fungi with an establishment of the new subclass Phallomycetidae and two new orders. Mycologia 98(6): 949–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832624
  • Humpert AJ, Muench EL, Giachini AJ, Castellano MA, Spatafora JW (2001) Molecular phylogenetics of Ramaria and related genera: evidence from nuclear large subunit and mitochondrial small subunit rDNA sequences. Mycologia 93: 465–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/3761733
  • Jülich W (1972) Monographie der Athelieae (Corticiaceae, Basidiomycetes). Willdenowia Beiheft 7: 1–283.
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD (2019) MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20(4): 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108
  • Ke ZD (2016) Studies on macrofungi diversity in Shergyla Mountain National Nature Reserve in Tibet. Jilin Agricultural University.
  • Knudson AG (2012) The genus Ramaria in Minnesota. Master of Science thesis, University of Minnesota.
  • Liu S, Chen YY, Sun YF, He XL, Song CG, Si J, Liu DM, Gates G, Cui BK (2023) Systematic classification and phylogenetic relationships of the brown-rot fungi within the Polyporales. Fungal Diversity 118(1): 1–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-022-00511-2
  • Lowy B (1971) Tremellales. Flora Neotropica 6(8): 1–153.
  • Marr CD, Stuntz DE (1973) Ramaria of Western Washington. Bibliotheca Mycologica, Germany, 38 pp.
  • Martin GW (1948) New of noteworthy tropical fungi. IV. Lloydia 11(2): 111–122.
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop, New Orleans, 8 pp. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Nees Esenbeck (1817) System der Pilze und Schwämme, 334 pp.
  • Peng YB, Liu B, Li F (1992) Flora Fungorum Sinicorum Vol. 2. Tremellales et Dacrymycetales. Science Press, Beijing, 151 pp.
  • Petersen JH (1996) Farvekort. The Danish Mycological Society’s colour-chart. Foreningen til Svampekundskabens Fremme, Greve, 6 pp.
  • Petersen RH (1981) Ramaria subgenus Echinoramaria. Bibliotheca Mycologia 261 pp.
  • Petersen RH, Zang M (1986) New or interesting clavarioid fungi from Yunnan, China. Plant Diversity 8(3): 281–294.
  • Ryvarden L, Gilbertson RL (1993) European polypores. Part 1. Synopsis Fungorum 6: 1–387.
  • Shirouzu T, Hirose D, Tokumasu S (2007) Sequence analyses of the 28S rRNA gene D1/D2 region suggest Dacrymyces (Heterobasidiomycetes, Dacrymycetales) is polyphyletic. Mycoscience 48(6): 388–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10267-007-0378-0
  • Shirouzu T, Hosaka K, Nam KO, Weir BS, Johnston PR, Hosoya T (2017) Phylogenetic relationships of eight new Dacrymycetes collected from New Zealand. Persoonia 38(1): 156–169. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158517X695280
  • Sulistyo BP, Larsson KH, Haelewaters D, Ryberg M (2021) Multigene phylogeny and taxonomic revision of Atheliales s.l.: Reinstatement of three families and one new family, Lobuliciaceae fam. nov. Fungal Biology 125(3): 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2020.11.007
  • Wang SH, Li GJ, Phurbu D, He MQ, Zhang MZ, Zhu XY, Li JX, Zhao RL, Cao B (2023) Four new species of Russula from the Xizang Autonomous Region and other provinces of China. Mycology 15(2): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2023.2265667
  • Wei CL, Chen CC, He SH, Wu SH (2022) Dendrocorticiopsis orientalis gen. et sp. nov. of the Punctulariaceae (Corticiales, Basidiomycota) revealed by molecular data. MycoKeys 90: 19–30. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.90.84562
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: MA, Gefand DH, Sninsky JJ, White MJT (Eds) PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications; Academic Press, San Diego, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
  • Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Al-Ani LKT, Tedersoo L, Haelewaters D, Rajeshkumar KC, Zhao RL, Aptroot A, Leontyev DV, Saxena RK, Tokarev YS, Dai DQ, Letcher PM, Stephenson SL, Ertz D et al. (2020) Outline of fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 11(1): 1160–1456. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/8
  • Wu SH, Shih K, Yu SY (2011) Calocera bambusicola sp. nov. and C. sinensis newly recorded from Taiwan. Mycotaxon 115(1): 163–169. https://doi.org/10.5248/115.163
  • Yang Y, Jiang Q, Li Q, Yang J, Cha L, Cheng L, Yang S, Zhao C, Zhou H (2023) Molecular systematics and taxonomic analyses of three new wood-inhabiting fungi of Hyphoderma (Hyphodermataceae, Basidiomycota). Journal of Fungi 9(11): 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9111044
  • Yuan Q, Luo KY, Zhang Y, Zhao CL (2023) Morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses revealed three new wood-inhabiting fungi (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) in Southern China. Phytotaxa 592(3): 179–195. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.592.3.1
  • Yurchenko K, Wołkowycki M (2022) New species of corticioid fungi (Basidiomycota) for Poland found in Białowieża Primeval Forest in 2018–2020. Acta Mycologica 58: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5586/am.577
  • Zamora JC, Ekman S (2020) Phylogeny and character evolution in the Dacrymycetes, and systematics of Unilacrymaceae and Dacryonaemataceae fam. nov. Persoonia 44(1): 161–205. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2020.44.07
  • Zhao LF, Li XG (1987) Partial fungal list of Nyingchi region, Milin, Tibet. Journal of Southwest Forestry College 7(1): 55–58. [Natural Science]
  • Zhao CL, Qu MH, Huang RX, Karunarathna SC (2023) Multi‐gene phylogeny and taxonomy of the wood‐rotting fungal genus Phlebia sensu lato (Polyporales, Basidiomycota). Journal of Fungi 320(9): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030320
login to comment