Research Article
Print
Research Article
Phylogeny and species delimitations in the economically, medically, and ecologically important genus Samsoniella (Cordycipitaceae, Hypocreales)
expand article infoYao Wang, Zhi-Qin Wang, Chinnapan Thanarut§, Van-Minh Dao|, Yuan-Bing Wang, Hong Yu
‡ Yunnan University, Kunming, China
§ Maejo University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| Institute of Regional Research and Development, Ministry of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
Open Access

Abstract

Samsoniella is a ubiquitous genus of cosmopolitan arthropod-pathogenic fungi in the family Cordycipitaceae. The fungi have economic, medicinal, and ecological importance. Prior taxonomic studies of these fungi relied predominantly on phylogenetic inferences from five loci, namely, the nuclear ribosomal small and large subunits (nr SSU and nr LSU), the 3’ portion of translation elongation factor 1 alpha (3P_TEF), and RNA polymerase II subunits 1 and 2 (RPB1 and RPB2). Despite many new species being described, not all of the recognized species inside this group formed well-supported clades. Thus, the search for new markers appropriate for molecular phylogenetic analysis of Samsoniella remains a challenging problem. In our study, we selected the internal transcribed spacer regions of the rDNA (ITS rDNA) and seven gene regions, namely, 3P_TEF, the 5’ portion of translation elongation factor 1 alpha (5P_TEF), RPB1, RPB2, γ-actin (ACT), β-tubulin (TUB), and a gene encoding a minichromosome maintenance protein (MCM7), as candidate markers for species identification. Genetic divergence comparisons showed that the ITS, RPB2, ACT, and TUB sequences provided little valuable information with which to separate Samsoniella spp. In contrast, sequence data for 3P_TEF, 5P_TEF, RPB1, and MCM7 provided good resolution of Samsoniella species. The phylogenetic tree inferred from combined data (5P_TEF + 3P_TEF + RPB1 + MCM7) showed well-supported clades for Samsoniella and allowed for the delimitation of 26 species in this genus. The other two species (S. formicae and S. lepidopterorum) were not evaluated, as they had abundant missing data.

Key words

Isaria-like fungi, multi-locus phylogeny, new species, species diversity

Introduction

Samsoniella is a ubiquitous genus of cosmopolitan arthropod-pathogenic fungi containing several species with significant economic and medicinal value (Wang et al. 2022). Samsoniella hepiali is a well-known edible and medicinal fungus that is widely distributed in China and Argentina (Chen et al. 2021). Several studies have shown that S. hepiali possesses various pharmacological properties, including anti-cancer, analgesic, and proapoptotic activities (Dai et al. 1989; Jiang et al. 2010; Thakur et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2016). The fungus has been frequently used in China for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, respiratory conditions, hyposexuality, hyperglycemia, and renal disorders, as it has immunomodulatory effects that result in clearing of the lungs, lowering blood glucose, and reinforcing kidney function (Lou et al. 1986; Huang et al. 1988; Wang and Huang 1988; Dai et al. 1989; Zou and Huang 1993; Xiang et al. 2006). To date, more than 260 healthcare products in the world market have been developed with S. hepiali as a raw material, creating an economic value of approximately RMB10 billion ($1.46 billion) per year (Wang et al. 2020a). Samsoniella farinospora also has potential to be further developed into future healthcare products; this species and S. hepiali have a close genetic relationship and similar pharmacological activities (Wang et al. 2022). The arthropod-pathogenic fungi Samsoniella spp. are widely distributed and infest diverse hosts, and some species have been considered as potential biocontrol agents against pest insects (Wang et al. 2022).

The genus Samsoniella was established on the basis of three species with orange cylindrical to clavate stromata, superficial perithecia, and orange conidiophores with Isaria-like phialides and white to cream conidia: the type species S. inthanonensis and two other species, S. alboaurantia and S. aurantia (Mongkolsamrit et al. 2018). However, it is difficult to identify individual species of Samsoniella using only morphological characteristics (Wang et al. 2022). Given the problems with species delimitation in Samsoniella using morphology, molecular data are essential to establish robust species boundaries. Mongkolsamrit et al. (2018) segregated the above three Isaria-like species from the Akanthomyces group based on the nuclear ribosomal small and large subunits (nr SSU and nr LSU) and three nuclear genes encoding elongation factor 1 alpha (3P_TEF, the 3’ portion of translation elongation factor 1 alpha), RNA polymerase II largest subunit (RPB1), and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2). Subsequently, more than 15 new species and new combinations were erected using combined analysis of the five-locus sequence data (Wang et al. 2020a; Wang et al. 2022). However, recent phylogenetic analyses together with our five-gene phylogeny of the family Cordycipitaceae (Fig. 1) showed that: (1) not all of the recognized species in this group formed well-supported clades; (2) the clade composed of S. inthanonensis / S. lanmaoa, S. cristata / S. tortricidae, and S. coleopterorum / S. pseudogunii showed ambiguous positions; and (3) the genetic distances of Samsoniella species for the combined five-gene sequences were significantly lower than for species of related genera within Cordycipitaceae.

Figure 1. 

Phylogenetic relationships among the genus Samsoniella and its allies in Cordycipitaceae based on Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses of a five-locus (nr SSU, nr LSU, 3P_TEF, RPB1, and RPB2) dataset. No significant differences in topology are observed between BI and ML (RAxML) phylogenies. Statistical support values (≥ 0.7/70%) are shown at the nodes for BI posterior probabilities/ML bootstrap support. Materials in bold type are those analyzed in this study.

In the current study, we analyzed species of the recently circumscribed genus Samsoniella, based on morphological observations and phylogenetic inference. Moreover, we selected the internal transcribed spacer regions of the rDNA (ITS rDNA) and six protein-coding genes (elongation factor EF-1α (3P_TEF and 5P_TEF, the 5’ portion of translation elongation factor 1 alpha), RNA polymerases (RPB1 and RPB2), γ-actin (ACT), β-tubulin (TUB), and a gene encoding a minichromosome maintenance protein (MCM7)) for evaluation as taxonomic candidate markers for phylogenetic inference; these have been commonly used in fungal species identification and in phylogenetic reconstructions of fungi (AFTOL, http://aftol.org/data.php). Finally, nucleotide sequences derived from four markers, namely, 3P_TEF, 5P_TEF, RPB1, and MCM7, were used to examine phylogenetic relationships and assess species boundaries within the genus.

Materials and methods

Specimen collection and fungus isolation

Fungus-infected insect specimens were collected from seven locations in 2016 and 2020, including three different locations within Yunnan Province, China, two locations within Lao Cai Province, Vietnam, one location within Oudomxay Province, Laos, and one location in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Teleomorph specimens were collected by carefully unearthing their hosts with a scoop and placing the samples in sterile bags. Conidia developing on insect cadavers were transplanted onto plates of potato dextrose agar (PDA; potato 200 g/L, dextrose 20 g/L, agar 20 g/L) and cultured at 25 °C. Colonies of the isolated filamentous fungi appearing in the culture were transferred onto fresh PDA media. The purified fungal strain was transferred to PDA slants and cultured at 25 °C until hyphae spread across the entire slope. Emerging fungal spores were washed with sterile physiological saline and made into a spore suspension of 1 × 103 cells/mL. To obtain monospore cultures, a portion of the spore suspension was placed on PDA using a sterile micropipette, and then incubated at 25 °C. Teleomorph specimens were rinsed with tap water, washed with sterile distilled water, and then dried on sterile filter paper. A mass of ascospores and asci was removed from perithecia with a fine needle and placed in a drop of sterile water that was stirred with a different needle to distribute the elements on the slide. A portion of the drop containing ascospores was placed on PDA using a sterile micropipette, and then incubated at 25 °C. The purified fungal strains were maintained in a culture room at 25 °C or transferred to PDA slants and stored at 4 °C. Voucher specimens and the corresponding isolated strains were deposited in the Yunnan Herbal Herbarium (YHH) and the Yunnan Fungal Culture Collection (YFCC), respectively, of Yunnan University, Kunming, China.

Morphological observations

Macro-morphological characteristics, including the host, geographical location, color and shape of the stromata, and perithecial orientation (superficial, immersed, or semi-immersed; ordinal or oblique) were examined under a dissecting microscope (SZ61, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). For morphological evaluation, microscope slides were prepared by placing mycelia from the cultures on PDA blocks (5 mm in diameter) and then overlaid with a coverslip. Medan dye solution was used to stain asci and ascospores. Other structures were mounted in water. The sizes and shapes of the microcharacteristics (e.g., asci, ascospores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia) were determined using a light microscope (CX40, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and a scanning electron microscope (Quanta 200 FEG, FEI Company, Hillsboro, USA). Individual length and width measurements were taken for 30–100 replicates, including the absolute minima and maxima.

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Specimens and live axenic cultures were prepared for DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted using a Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The phylogenetic positions of unknown Samsoniella isolates were evaluated with phylogenetic inferences based on five genes, namely, nr SSU, nr LSU, 3P_TEF, RPB1, and RPB2. The primer pair nrSSU-CoF and nrSSU-CoR (Wang et al. 2015) was used to amplify nr SSU; the primer pair LR5 and LR0R (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; Rehner and Samuels 1994) was used to amplify nr LSU, and the primer pair 983F and 2218R (Rehner and Buckley 2005) was used to amplify 3P_TEF. For amplification of the RPB1 and RPB2 genes, PCR primer pairs RPB1-5’F / RPB1-5’R and RPB2-5’F / RPB2-5’R (Bischoff et al. 2006; Sung et al. 2007) were employed. In total, seven DNA regions were evaluated as potential DNA barcodes for establishing species boundaries in Samsoniella because of their wide usage in phylogenetic studies of the sac-fungi. The markers included a fragment of the ITS region using primers ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990), a fragment of the 5P_TEF region using primers EF1T and EF2T (Rehner and Buckley 2005; Bischoff et al. 2006), a fragment of the 3P_TEF, RPB1 and RPB2 region with the same primer sets mentioned previously, a fragment of the ACT region using primers Act-1 and Act-4R (Voigt and Wöstemeyer 2000), a fragment of the TUB region using primers Bt2a and Bt1b (Glass and Donaldson 1995), and a fragment of the MCM7 region using primers Mcm7-709for and Mcm7-1348rev (Schmitt et al. 2009). All of the PCR reactions were performed in a final volume of 50 μL containing 25 μL 2 × Taq PCR Master Mix (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., China), 0.5 μL of each primer (10 μM), 1 μL of genomic DNA, and 23 μL of RNase-Free water. PCR products were sequenced by Beijing Sinogenomax Co., Ltd., China.

Phylogenetic analyses

Amplified fragments were sequenced in both directions using the same primer pairs used for amplification. All retrieved sequences from GenBank were combined with those generated in our study. The taxonomic information and GenBank accession numbers are provided in Suppl. material 1 and Table 1. Sequences were aligned using MAFFT v.7 (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/). The aligned sequences were then manually corrected where necessary. Following alignment, the sequences of the five genes, namely, nr SSU, nr LSU, 3P_TEF, RPB1, and RPB2, were concatenated. Conflicts among the five genes were resolved using PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002). The results showed that the phylogenetic signals for the five loci were congruent (P = 0.02). The best-fitting substitution model for these 11 partitions was calculated by using jModelTest version 2.1.4 (Darriba et al. 2012). The model GTR+G+I was used for partitions of nr SSU, nr LSU, 3P_TEF_pos1, 3P_TEF_pos2, 3P_TEF_pos3, RPB1_pos3, and RPB2_pos3, and the model GTR+I was used for partitions of RPB1_pos1, RPB1_pos2, RPB2_pos1, and RPB2_pos2. Bayesian posterior probabilities (BP) were estimated with the same partition parameters conducted in MrBayes v3.2.7a (Ronquist et al. 2012). Four Markov Chain Monte Carlo chains were run, each beginning with a random tree and sampling, one tree every 100 generations of 2,000,000 generations, and the first 25% of samples were discarded as burn-in. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses were conducted in RAxML 7.0.3 (Stamatakis et al. 2008) with the recommended partition parameters, and 1000 rapid bootstrap replicates were performed on the dataset.

Table 1.

Specimen information and GenBank accession numbers for sequences used in this study. Boldface: data generated in this study.

Taxon Voucher information GenBank accession number
3P_TEF 5P_TEF RPB1 RPB2 ACT TUB MCM7 ITS
Samsoniella alboaurantium CBS 240.32 JF416019 JN049895 JF415999 AY624178
Samsoniella alboaurantium CBS 262.58T MF416497 MF416654 MF416448 AY624179
Samsoniella alpina YFCC 5818T MN576979 OQ506160 MN576869 MN576923 OQ506202 OQ506254 OQ506229 OQ476469
Samsoniella alpina YFCC 5831 MN576980 OQ506161 MN576870 MN576924 OQ506203 OQ506255 OQ506230 OQ476470
Samsoniella antleroides YFCC 6016T MN576973 OQ506162 MN576863 MN576917 OQ506204 OQ506256 OQ506231 OQ476471
Samsoniella antleroides YFCC 6113 MN576974 OQ506163 MN576864 MN576918 OQ506205 OQ506257 OQ506232 OQ476472
Samsoniella asiatica YFCC 869T OQ506153 OQ506164 OQ506195 OQ506187 OQ506206 OQ506258 OQ506233 OQ476473
Samsoniella asiatica YFCC 870 OQ506154 OQ506165 OQ506196 OQ506188 OQ506207 OQ506259 OQ506234 OQ476474
Samsoniella asiatica YFCC 871 OQ506155 OQ506166 OQ506197 OQ506189 OQ506208 OQ506260 OQ506235 OQ476475
Samsoniella aurantia TBRC 7271T MF140846 MF140791 MF140818 MF140764
Samsoniella aurantia YFCC 874 OQ506157 OQ506167 OQ506199 OQ506191 OQ506209 OQ506261 OQ506236 OQ476476
Samsoniella aurantia YFCC 880 OQ506156 OQ506168 OQ506198 OQ506190 OQ506210 OQ506262 OQ506237 OQ476477
Samsoniella cardinalis YFCC 5830 MN576958 OQ506169 MN576848 MN576902 OQ506211 OQ506263 OQ506238 OQ476478
Samsoniella cardinalis YFCC 6144T MN576956 OQ506170 MN576846 MN576900 OQ506212 OQ506264 OQ506239 OQ476479
Samsoniella coccinellidicola YFCC 8772T ON676514 ON676502 ON568685
Samsoniella coccinellidicola YFCC 8773 ON676515 ON676503 ON568686
Samsoniella coleopterorum A19501T MN101586 MT642600 MN101585 MT626376
Samsoniella cristata YFCC 6023 MN576962 OQ506171 MN576852 MN576906 OQ506213 OQ506265 OQ506240 OQ476480
Samsoniella cristata YFCC 7004T MN576963 OQ506172 MN576853 MN576907 OQ506214 OQ506266 OQ506241 OQ476481
Samsoniella erucae KY11121T ON525425 ON502828
Samsoniella erucae KY11122 ON525427 ON502847
Samsoniella farinospora YFCC 8774T ON676516 ON676504 ON568687
Samsoniella farinospora YFCC 9051 ON676517 ON676505 ON568688
Samsoniella guizhouensis KY11161T ON525429 ON502823
Samsoniella guizhouensis KY11162 ON525431 ON502845
Samsoniella haniana YFCC 8769T ON676518 ON676506 ON568689
Samsoniella haniana YFCC 8771 ON676520 ON676508 ON568691
Samsoniella hepiali ICMM 82-2T MN576964 OQ506173 MN576854 MN576908 OQ506215 OQ506267 OQ506242 OQ476482
Samsoniella hepiali YFCC 868 OQ506158 OQ506175 OQ506200 OQ506192 OQ506217 OQ506269 OQ506244 OQ476484
Samsoniella hepiali YFCC 2702 MN576966 OQ506174 MN576856 MN576910 OQ506216 OQ506268 OQ506243 OQ476483
Samsoniella hymenopterorum A19521 MN101588 MT642603 MT642604 MN128224
Samsoniella hymenopterorum A19522T MN101591 MN101589 MN101590 MN128081
Samsoniella inthanonensis TBRC 7915T MF140849 MF140790 MF140815 MF140761
Samsoniella kunmingensis YHH 16002T MN576972 MN576862 MN576916 OQ506218 OQ506270
Samsoniella lanmaoa YFCC 6148T MN576959 OQ506176 MN576849 MN576903 OQ506219 OQ506271 OQ506245 OQ476485
Samsoniella lanmaoa YFCC 6193 MN576960 OQ506177 MN576850 MN576904 OQ506220 OQ506272 OQ506246 OQ476486
Samsoniella neopupicola KY11321T ON525433 ON502843
Samsoniella neopupicola KY11322 ON525435 ON502834
Samsoniella pseudogunii GY407201T MZ855233 MZ855239 MZ827470
Samsoniella pseudogunii GY407202 MZ855234 MZ855240 MZ831863
Samsoniella pseudotortricidae YFCC 9052T ON676521 ON676509 ON568692
Samsoniella pseudotortricidae YFCC 9053 ON676522 ON676510 ON568693
Samsoniella pupicola DY101681T MZ855231 MZ855237 MZ827085
Samsoniella pupicola DY101682 MZ855232 MZ855238 MZ827008
Samsoniella ramosa YFCC 6020T MN576975 OQ506178 MN576865 MN576919 OQ506221 OQ506273 OQ476487
Samsoniella sapaensis YFCC 872 OQ506151 OQ506179 OQ506193 OQ506185 OQ506222 OQ506274 OQ506247 OQ476488
Samsoniella sapaensis YFCC 873T OQ506152 OQ506180 OQ506194 OQ506186 OQ506223 OQ506275 OQ506248 OQ476489
Samsoniella sinensis YFCC 8766T ON676523 ON676511 ON568694
Samsoniella sinensis YFCC 8767 ON676524 ON676512 ON568695
Samsoniella tiankengensis KY11741T ON525437 ON502840
Samsoniella tiankengensis KY11742 ON525439 ON502849
Samsoniella tortricidae YFCC 6131T MN576976 OQ506181 MN576866 MN576920 OQ506224 OQ506276 OQ506249 OQ476490
Samsoniella tortricidae YFCC 6142 MN576978 OQ506182 MN576868 MN576922 OQ506225 OQ506277 OQ506250 OQ476491
Samsoniella yunnanensis YFCC 1527T MN576982 OQ506183 MN576872 MN576926 OQ506226 OQ506278 OQ506251 OQ476492
Samsoniella yunnanensis YFCC 1824 MN576983 OQ506184 MN576873 MN576927 OQ506227 OQ506279 OQ506252 OQ476493
Akanthomyces waltergamsii YFCC 883 OQ506159 OQ506201 OQ506228 OQ506280 OQ506253 OQ476494

We applied a (phylo-) genetic distance matrix calculation for the candidate markers, namely, ITS, 3P_TEF, 5P_TEF, RPB1, RPB2, ACT, TUB, and MCM7, to assess species boundaries of 11 Samsoniella spp. (Suppl. material 2) because their sequence data for the eight loci were complete. The pairwise genetic distances of the 11 Samsoniella lineages were measured based on the Kimura two-parameter model using MEGA v6.06 software (Tamura et al. 2013). Only candidate markers with the mean threshold criteria (p-distances) > 0.01 were used to examine phylogenetic relationships between Samsoniella spp. and to assess species boundaries within the genus. As a result, four markers, namely, 3P_TEF, 5P_TEF, RPB1, and MCM7, were singled out. Phylogenetic analyses were based on the combined four-locus (5P_TEF + 3P_TEF + RPB1 + MCM7) sequences. The best-fitting nucleotide substitution model was determined using PartitionFinder V1.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2012), resulting in three partitions (5P_TEF + 3P_TEF, RPB1, and MCM7). The following models were implemented in the Bayesian phylogenetic analyses: GTR + I + G for 5P_TEF + 3P_TEF and GTR + I for partitions of RPB1 and MCM7. The BI analysis was run on MrBayes v3.2.7a for five million generations. GTR + FO + G was selected as the optimal model for ML analysis, and 1000 rapid bootstrap replicates were performed on the dataset. ML phylogenetic analyses were conducted in RAxML 7.0.3 (Stamatakis et al. 2008). Additional ML analyses were performed using IQ-TREE v. 2.1.3 with ultrafast bootstrapping for the estimation of branch support (Minh et al. 2020). Further, ML analysis (RAxML) was applied to single-locus genealogies for 5P_TEF, 3P_TEF, RPB1, and MCM7.

Identification of host insects

The host insects of Samsoniella spp. were identified on the basis of morphological characteristics and further identified using molecular analyses based on the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene (COX1) and mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (CYTB). Genomic DNA was extracted from the head and leg areas of the cadavers of the host insects using the CTAB method (Liu et al. 2001). The COX1 and CYTB loci were amplified using primer pair Hep-cox1F / Hep-cox1R and primer pair Hep-cytbF / Hep-cytbR, respectively (Simon et al. 1994). Sequences were analyzed using MEGA v6.06 software and run through Standard Nucleotide BLAST (Genbank, NCBI nucleotide database) to assess similarity with reported insect sequences.

Results

Sequencing and phylogenetic analyses

The 11 DNA loci were readily amplified and sequenced, and there was a fairly high success rate in this study. Phylogenetic analyses based on the combined five-gene (nr SSU + nr LSU + 3P_TEF + RPB1 + RPB2) sequences from 120 fungal taxa confirmed the presence and positions of Samsoniella and related genera within Cordycipitaceae. The concatenated five-gene dataset consisted of 4994 bp (nr SSU, 1134 bp; nr LSU, 901 bp; 3P_TEF, 1044 bp; RPB1, 759 bp; RPB2, 1156 bp). Eleven well-supported clades were recognized based on both BI and ML analyses of the combined dataset from Cordycipitaceae and Trichoderma, corresponding to the genera Akanthomyces, Amphichorda, Ascopolyporus, Beauveria, Blackwellomyces, Cordyceps, Gibellula, Hevansia, Samsoniella, Simplicillium, and Trichoderma as the outgroup (Fig. 1). A collection of eight isolates of unknown identity were shown to resolve in Samsoniella and to likely represent two known species and two new species of Samsoniella. Sequenced strains resolving in aforementioned distinct clades are thus proposed to represent the hereby newly erected species S. asiatica and S. sapaensis. The phylogenetic analyses suggested the existence of distinct species in the Samsoniella clade that we accordingly propose as new species: S. asiatica and S. sapaensis. These results also showed some ambiguous positions, including those of S. inthanonensis / S. lanmaoa, S. cristata / S. tortricidae, and S. coleopterorum / S. pseudogunii (Fig. 1). Although morphological observations revealed some differences in the characteristics between the three pairs of ambiguous species (Mongkolsamrit et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2020a; Chen et al. 2021), they were practically indistinguishable in the phylogeny based on the sequences of the five genes. This suggests that their status as distinct species is subjective and warrants further critical analyses, including the necessity for more DNA molecular markers.

The genetic divergence comparisons showed that: (1) the mean thresholds (p-distances) of ITS, RPB2, ACT, and TUB were lower than 0.01, indicating that neither were qualified as DNA markers; (2) the mean thresholds (p-distances) of 3P_TEF, 5P_TEF, RPB1, and MCM7 were > 0.01, and (3) the highest number of species was delimited in the genetic distance analysis for the 3P_TEF sequence data, followed by 5P_TEF, MCM7, and RPB1 sequences (Suppl. material 2).

The analyzed data matrix used to construct the phylogeny of Samsoniella species included sequences from 56 fungal taxa (Table 1). The final dataset consisted of 3130 bp of sequence data, including gaps (5P_TEF, 743 bp; 3P_TEF, 1023 bp; RPB1, 735 bp; and MCM7, 629 bp). Both BI and ML analyses produced trees with similar topologies that resolved most of the Samsoniella lineages in separate terminal branches (Fig. 2). The conservative results from phylogenetic analyses suggested that Samsoniella is composed of 26 species, namely, S. alboaurantium, S. alpina, S. antleroides, S. asiatica, S. aurantia, S. cardinalis, S. coccinellidicola (= S. guizhouensis), S. coleopterorum (= S. pseudogunii), S. cristata, S. erucae, S. farinospora, S. haniana, S. hepiali, S. hymenopterorum, S. inthanonensis, S. kunmingensis, S. lanmaoa, S. neopupicola, S. pseudotortricidae, S. pupicola, S. ramosa, S. sapaensis, S. sinensis, S. tiankengensis, S. tortricidae, and S. yunnanensis. The trees based on the combined five-locus sequences (nr SSU + nr LSU + 3P_TEF + RPB1 + RPB2) and the combined four-locus (5P_TEF + 3P_TEF + RPB1 + MCM7) sequences showed topological differences, especially in the clades composed of S. inthanonensis / S. lanmaoa and S. cristata / S. tortricidae (Figs 1, 2). However, the latter resolved these clades, suggesting that they should be regarded as different species.

Figure 2. 

Phylogenetic tree of Samsoniella based on Bayesian inference and Maximum Likelihood analyses of a 4-locus (5P_TEF, 3P_TEF, RPB1 and MCM7) dataset. No significant differences in topology are observed between BI and ML (IQ-TREE) phylogenies. Numbers at the branches indicate support values (BI-PP/RAxML-BS/IQ-TREE-BS) above 0.7/70%/70%. Isolates in bold type are those analyzed in this study.

The tree topologies for the individual loci (5P_TEF, 3P_TEF, RPB1, and MCM7) did not show congruence (Suppl. material 3). However, in all of the analyses, the newly discovered species S. asiatica had a close genetic relationship with S. yunnanensis. The RPB1 gene was unable to distinguish the two species (Suppl. material 3: fig. S3). However, they were regarded as different species with strong support from 5P_TEF, 3P_TEF and MCM7 (Suppl. material 3: figs S1, S2, S4). Phylogenetic analyses based on the combined data revealed that the distinctive species S. sapaensis was closely related to S. haniana, which is in agreement with the results obtained for 3P_TEF and RPB1.

Taxonomy

Based on the results of the phylogenetic analyses and the morphological data, we add two new descriptions to the record of two known species and propose to erect two new species of Samsoniella.

Samsoniella asiatica H. Yu bis, Y. Wang & Z.Q. Wang, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 848022
Fig. 3

Etymology

Named after Asia (China, Vietnam and Laos), where the species was originally collected.

Figure 3. 

Samsoniella asiatica A fungus-infected lepidopteran pupa B stipes producing a mass of conidia at the apex C synnemata of fungus arising from lepidopteran larva D colony as obversed on PDA medium E–M conidiophores, phialides and conidia on PDA N conidia on PDA. Scale bars: 10 mm (A, C); 5 mm (B); 20 mm (D); 15 μm (E); 10 μm (F, G, H); 5 μm (I, J, K, N); 3 μm (L, M).

Type

China, Yunnan Province, Yuanyang County, Xinjie Town, Duoyishu Village (23°4′50″N, 102°48′34″E, 1866 m above sea level), on a pupa of Lepidoptera in a dead twig, 10 December 2021, Yao Wang (holotype: YHH 869; ex-type living culture: YFCC 869).

Description

Teleomorph: Undetermined. Anamorph: Synnemata arising from lepidopteran insects. Synnemata erect, flexuous, white or pale orange, 4–26 × 0.4–1.5 mm. Stipes cylindrical, producing a mass of conidia at the branches of synnemata, powdery and floccose. Colonies on PDA moderately fast-growing, 41–45 mm diameter in 14 days at 25 °C, white, cottony, generating several concentric rings at the centrum, sporulating abundantly, reverse white to pale yellow. Hyphae smooth-walled, branched, septate, hyaline, 1.3–2.0 µm wide. Conidiophores smooth-walled, cylindrical, solitary or verticillate, 4.6–10.3 × 0.8–1.9 µm. Phialides on conidiophores verticillate, usually in whorls of two to four, or solitary on hyphae, 2.7–8.6 µm long, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex, from 0.7–1.7 µm wide (base) to 0.6–1.1 µm wide (apex). Conidia smooth and hyaline, fusiform or oval, one-celled, 1.1–1.8 × 0.8–1.2 µm, often in chains. Size and shape of phialides and conidia similar in culture and on natural substratum.

Distribution

Yunnan Province, China; Lao Cai Province, Vietnam; Oudomxay Province, Laos.

Additional materials examined

Vietnam, Lao Cai Province, Sa Pa District, Hoang Lien Mountains (22°21′4″N, 103°46′29″E, 1931 m above sea level), on a larva of Noctuidae buried in soil, 31 October 2016, collected by Hong Yu (YHH 871; living culture: YFCC 871); Laos, Oudomxay Province, Muang Xay County, Nagang Village (20°42′51″N, 102°5′44″E, 698 m above sea level), on a larva of Spilosoma, 29 July 2019, Yao Wang (YHH 870; living culture: YFCC 870).

Commentary

Morphologically, S. asiatica resembles the phylogenetically closely related sister species S. yunnanensis in producing orange to pink stipes, a mass of conidia toward the apex synnemata and Isaria-like asexual conidiogenous structure. Additionally, both of the fungal sexual morphs have not been determined yet. However, S. asiatica can be distinguished from S. yunnanensis by its shorter phialides (2.7–8.6 µm) and smaller conidia (1.1–1.8 × 0.8–1.2 µm). Ecologically, S. asiatica has been found to parasitize larvae and pupae of Lepidoptera, whereas S. yunnanensis is associated with pupae of Limacodidae in cocoons and Cordyceps spp. (Wang et al. 2020a). Both morphological and phylogenetic analyses support the idea that this fungus is a distinct species in the genus Samsoniella.

Samsoniella aurantia Mongkolsamrit, Noisripoom, Thanakitpipattana, Spatafora & Luangsa-ard

MycoBank No: 823786
Fig. 4

Type

Thailand (holotype: BBH 33739; ex-type living culture: TBRC 7271).

Figure 4. 

Samsoniella aurantia A, B perithecial stromata as encountered in the field C, D fungus on the pupae of Limacodidae inhabiting cocoons E, F synnemata arising from lepidopteran larvae G, H Perithecia I–K asci L colony as obversed on PDA. Scale bars: 10 mm (C, D, F); 5 mm (E); 200 µm (G); 100 µm (H); 10 µm (I, J, K); 20 mm (L).

Description

Teleomorph: Stromata arising from lepidopteran insects, gregarious, branched or unbranched, up to 8.8–63.8 mm long. Stipes fleshly, flexuous, yellowish to orange, cylindrical to clavate, 4.1–49.1 × 0.2–2.3 mm. Fertile parts reddish orange, clavate, lateral side usually have a longitudinal section without producing perithecia, 3.8–17.7 × 0.8–4.1 mm. Perithecia crowded, superficial, narrowly ovoid to fusiform, 302.7–449.7 × 105.3–164.9 µm. Asci hyaline, cylindrical, 8‐spored, 92–190 × 1.8–3.6 μm. Apical caps prominent, hemiglobose, 2.1–3.4 µm wide, 1.2–2.3 µm high. Ascospores not observed. Anamorph: See Mongkolsamrit et al. (2018). The following descriptions are based on other specimens examined from China. Synnemata arising from lepidopteran larvae. Synnemata erect, flexuous, irregularly branched, white or pale orange, 7.7–32.6 × 0.2–2.1 mm. Stipes cylindrical, producing a mass of conidia at the branches of synnemata, powdery and floccose. Colonies on PDA moderately fast-growing, 26–30 mm diameter in 14 days at 25 °C, light orange to orange, consisting of a basal felt and cottony, sporulating abundantly at the centrum, reverse yellowish, turning deep yellow. Synnemata emerging after 25 days, solitary, unbranched. Size and shape of phialides and conidia similar to that of S. aurantia ex-type isolate (TBRC 7271).

Distribution

Chiang Mai Province, Thailand; Guizhou and Yunnan Province, China; Lao Cai Province, Vietnam.

Materials examined

China, Yunnan Province, Zhaotong City, Shuifu County, Taiping Town, Tongluoba National Forest Park (28°24′36″N, 104°9′0″E, 1750 m above sea level), on larvae of Hepialidae living in Qiongzhuea tumidinoda forests, 20 June 2015, collected by Hong Yu (YHH 874, YHH 890–YHH 893; living culture: 874). Vietnam, Lao Cai Province, Sa Pa District, Hoang Lien Mountains (22°21′8″N, 103°46′29″E, 1900 m above sea level), on a pupa of Limacodidae in a cocoon buried in soil, 31 October 2016, Hong Yu (YHH 880, YHH 894; living culture: YFCC 880). Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Chiang Mai City, Queen Sirikit Botanic Garden (536 m above sea level), on lepidopteran larvae in leaf litter, 26 August 2018, Yao Wang (YHH 895–YHH 896).

Commentary

Numerous species of Samsoniella were described originally from asexual morphs, including S. aurantia from Thailand (Mongkolsamrit et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2020a; Chen et al. 2022; Wang et al. 2022). Chen et al. (2021) reported S. aurantia isolated from a lepidopteran pupa as a new record for China. However, its sexual morph was undetermined in these studies. The present study is the first to report the teleomorph reproductive stage for S. aurantia. Samsoniella aurantia has fleshy stromata, clavate fertile parts, superficial perithecia, and cylindrical asci with bola‐shaped ascospores. However, S. aurantia differs from other teleomorph species by its phylogenetic placement in the genus by having abundant long stromata extruded from the entire body of lepidopteran insects and by shorter asci measuring 92–190 µm.

Samsoniella hepiali (Q.T. Chen & R.Q. Dai ex R.Q. Dai et al.) H. Yu, R.Q. Dai, Y.B. Wang, Y. Wang & Zhu L. Yang

MycoBank No: 833114
Fig. 5

Type

China (holotype: IMM 82-2 = CHICMM 82-2; ex-type living culture: ICMM 82-2).

Figure 5. 

Samsoniella hepiali A stromata of fungus arising from lepidopteran pupa B stromata and synnemata arising from lepidopteran pupa C, D perithecia E, F asci G colony as obversed on PDA medium H–L conidiophores, phialides and conidia on PDA. Scale bars: 10 mm (A, B); 300 µm (C); 100 µm (D); 20 µm (E, F); 20 mm (G); 10 µm (H, I); 5 µm (J, K).

Description

Teleomorph: Stromata from the whole body of lepidopteran pupae, gregarious, generally unbranched, up to 5–23 mm long. Stipes fleshly, flexuous or erect, yellowish to orange, cylindrical to clavate, 2.5–15.5 × 0.9–4.6 mm. Fertile parts orange, clavate, lateral side usually have a longitudinal section without producing perithecia, 1.3–8.5 × 0.8–5.2 mm. Perithecia crowded, superficial, narrowly ovoid to fusiform, 277.9–355.3 × 116.3–199.6 µm. Asci hyaline, cylindrical, 8‐spored, 145–300 × 3.5–5 μm. Apical caps prominent, hemiglobose, 2.5–4 µm wide, 2.4–3.2 µm high. Ascospores hyaline, bola‐shaped, septate, 120–240 × 0.8–1.5 μm. Anamorph: See Wang et al. (2020a). The following descriptions are based on other specimens examined from Vietnam. Synnemata arising from the whole body of lepidopteran pupae, branched or unbranched, 5–20 mm long. Stipes cylindrical or clavate, 0.6–4.2 mm wide, with powdery conidia at the apex, white to yellowish. Colonies on PDA moderately fast-growing, 32–45 mm diameter in 14 days at 25 °C, white to yellowish, cottony, with high mycelial density, reverse white to pale yellow, turning orange when old. Hyphae smooth-walled, branched, septate, hyaline, 0.9–2.3 µm wide. Conidiophores smooth-walled, cylindrical, solitary, 3.9–10.2 × 1.5–1.9 µm. Phialides on conidiophores verticillate, usually in whorls of two to five, or solitary on hyphae, 5.7–10.9 µm long, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex, from 1.4–1.9 µm wide (base) to 0.5–0.9 µm wide (apex). Conidia smooth and hyaline, fusiform or oval, one-celled, 1.9–2.8 × 1.0–1.6 µm, often in chains. Size and shape of phialides and conidia similar in culture and on natural substratum.

Distribution

Yunnan, Qinghai, Anhui and Guizhou Province, China; Lao Cai Province, Vietnam; Buenos Aires City, Argentina.

Materials examined

Vietnam, Lao Cai Province, Sa Pa District, Hoang Lien Mountains (22°21′10″N, 103°46′29″E, 1989 m above sea level), on pupae of Hepialidae buried in soil, 30 October 2016, collected by Hong Yu (YHH 868, YHH 897–YHH 899; living culture: YFCC 868, YFCC 897–YFCC 899).

Commentary

The strain (YFCC 868) isolated from the pupa of Hepialidae from Vietnam formed a well-supported clade with S. hepiali ex-type isolate (ICMM 82-2) (Fig. 2). Based on microscopic observation, the strain YFCC 868 displayed typical morphological characteristics of anamorphs found in species of Samsoniella. For YFCC 868, the size and shape of phialides and conidia were similar to those of S. hepiali as described by Wang YB et al. (2020b). Both morphological study and phylogenetic analyses supported the isolate YFCC 868 as being S. hepiali.

In the current study, the sexual morph of S. hepiali was first reported. As for other teleomorph species of Samsoniella, S. hepiali has fleshy stromata, clavate fertile parts, superficial perithecia, and cylindrical asci with bola‐shaped ascospores. Among these species, only three, namely, S. cardinalis, S. hepiali, and S. kunmingensis, have short stromata (Wang et al. 2020a; Wang et al. 2022). However, S. hepiali differs from S. cardinalis and S. kunmingensis by having abundant stromata extruded from the entire body of lepidopteran insects and by having clavate fertile parts with orange color.

Samsoniella sapaensis H. Yu bis, Y. Wang & Z.Q. Wang, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 848023
Fig. 6

Etymology

Named after the location Sa Pa District where the species was collected.

Figure 6. 

Samsoniella sapaensis A stromata of fungus arising from lepidopteran larva B, C stromata and synnemata arising from lepidopteran insects D synnemata of fungus E, F perithecia G, H asci I, J colony as obversed and its backside on PDA K–M conidiophores, phialides and conidia on PDA N conidia on PDA. Scale bars: 10 mm (A, C); 5 mm (B); 20 mm (D); 100 µm (E, F, G); 50 µm (H); 20 mm (I); 30 mm (J); 5 µm (K, N); 10 µm (L, M).

Type

Vietnam, Lao Cai Province, Sa Pa District, Hoang Lien National Park (22°19′30″N, 103°46′50″E, 2178 m above sea level), on a larva of Lepidoptera buried in soil, 26 October 2017, collected by Hong Yu (holotype: YHH 873; ex-type living culture: YFCC 873).

Description

Teleomorph: Stromata arising from the whole body of lepidopteran pupae or larvae, gregarious, generally unbranched, up to 22–38 mm long. Stipes fleshly, flexuous, yellowish to orange, cylindrical to clavate, 7.5–14.5 × 0.7–4.6 mm. Fertile parts yellowish to reddish orange, clavate, lateral side usually have a longitudinal section without producing perithecia, 1.5–21.3 × 1.0–2.8 mm. Perithecia crowded, superficial, narrowly ovoid to fusiform, 383.2–412.1 × 125.4–156.9 µm. Asci cylindrical, hyaline, 282.5–444.5 × 2.6–3.9 µm, with a hemispheric apical cap of 1.8–2.2 × 2.6–3.0 µm. Ascospores not observed. Anamorph: Synnemata arising from lepidopteran insects. Synnemata flexuous, irregularly branched, white or pale orange, 9–58 × 0.2–1.6 mm, Isaria-like morph producing a mass of conidia at the branches of synnemata, powdery and floccose. Colonies on PDA moderately fast-growing, 36–40 mm diameter in 14 days at 25 °C, white to pale pink, cottony, sporulating abundantly, reverse yellow to orange. Hyphae smooth-walled, branched, septate, hyaline, 1.0–1.9 µm wide. Conidiophores smooth-walled, cylindrical, solitary or verticillate, 6.5–17.5 × 1.0–1.6 µm. Phialides verticillate, usually in whorls of two to three, or solitary on hyphae, 2.8–7.6 µm long, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex, from 0.8–1.5 µm wide (base) to 0.6–0.9 µm wide (apex). Conidia smooth and hyaline, fusiform or oval, one-celled, 1.2–1.5 × 0.8–1.0 µm, often in chains. Size and shape of phialides and conidia similar in culture and on natural substratum.

Distribution

At present, known only in Sa Pa District, Lao Cai Province, Vietnam.

Additional materials examined

Vietnam, Lao Cai Province, Sa Pa District (22°21′4″N, 103°46′29″E, 1931 m above sea level), on a pupa of Limacodidae in a cocoon buried in soil, 31 October 2016, collected by Hong Yu (YHH 872; living culture: YFCC 872). Vietnam, Lao Cai Province, Sa Pa District, Hoang Lien National Park (22°19′30″N, 103°46′50″E, 2178 m above sea level), on larvae of Lepidoptera buried in soil, 26 October 2017, collected by Yuan-Bing Wang (YHH 900–YHH 906).

Commentary

Samsoniella sapaensis was identified as belonging to Samsoniella based on the phylogenetic analyses and was shown to resolve closely to S. haniana (Fig. 2). Morphologically, S. sapaensis is similar to S. haniana in sharing Isaria-like asexual conidiogenous structure which produces phialides with cylindrical to narrowly lageniform basal portion, fusiform or oval conidia (Wang et al. 2022). However, two samples of S. sapaensis were clustered together and formed a separate clade from S. haniana with strong statistical support (BI posterior probabilities = 1, ML bootstrap = 100%). Our morphological observation revealed some differences between them. Phialides on PDA of S. sapaensis (2.8–7.6 µm) are shorter than those of S. haniana (5.4–12.1 μm). Furthermore, conidia on PDA of S. sapaensis (1.2–1.5 × 0.8–1.0 μm) are smaller than those of S. haniana (2.3–3.7 × 1.2–2.8 μm).

Discussion

DNA sequence data for nr SSU, nr LSU, 3P_TEF, RPB1, and RPB2 have been used extensively to explore phylogenetic relationships among Samsoniella species in recent years (Mongkolsamrit et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2020a; Wang et al. 2022). However, not all of the recognized species inside this group formed well-supported clades in these five-gene phylogenies. Our results indicate that the ITS sequences (as the primary DNA barcording region for fungi) contain few informative characters for members of the genus (Suppl. material 1). The search for new markers that are appropriate for molecular phylogenetic analysis of Samsoniella remains a challenging problem. We attempted to address this in the current study, and to this end, we introduced the 5P_TEF, ACT, TUB, and MCM7 sequences that had not been previously employed for Samsoniella spp.

The ITS, RPB2, ACT, and TUB sequences provided limited valuable information to separate Samsoniella spp. In contrast, sequence data for the 3P_TEF, 5P_TEF, RPB1, and MCM7 loci provided good resolution of Samsoniella species (Suppl. material 2). The species delimitations by the tree topologies for the individual loci and the genetic divergence comparisons showed that the 3P_TEF sequence data provided the best resolution distinguishing Samsoniella spp., followed by 5P_TEF, MCM7, and RPB1 sequences (see Suppl. materials 2, 3). Our study introduced valuable sequence data for a single-copy protein-coding gene, MCM7. This gene region requires only two primers and is easily amplified. Although the sequence length of the MCM7 fragment was the shortest among the four loci analyzed in this study, the single-copy protein-coding gene, which was used successfully for determining phylogenetic relationships of Samsoniella, provided good resolution for terminal clades in the genus (Suppl. material 2: table S9 and Suppl. material 3: fig. S4). Future studies will benefit from the use of this single locus for the recognition and identification of species in the genus Samsoniella and for other fungal species.

In addition to identifying the most of the useful gene regions to accurately identify species of Samsoniella, an important goal of this study was to re-establish well-supported boundaries in this genus. Having determined that the 3P_TEF, 5P_TEF, MCM7 and RPB1 regions yielded the best resolution for distinguishing species of Samsoniella, a phylogenetic tree based on the combined data (5P_TEF + 3P_TEF + RPB1 + MCM7) for the genus was generated (Fig. 2). The resulting phylogeny showed well-supported clades for Samsoniella, although there was some incongruence with the single-locus phylogenies (Suppl. material 3). According to the phylogenetic tree, 26 out of the 28 molecularly confirmed species in Samsoniella were recognized (Fig. 2). Prior studies have delimited S. formicae and S. lepidopterorum as valid species on the basis of their phylogenies (Chen et al. 2020, 2022); however, our study did not include these sequences because they had abundant missing data, thus their status was not evaluated. These species would require resequencing and further revision to be recognized as supported lineages within the genus Samsoniella.

Our multilocus phylogeny demonstrated the cryptic nature of the genus. First, the species status of S. pseudogunii is doubtful. From a phylogenetic point of view, S. pseudogunii cannot be distinguished from S. coleopterorum, being inside the clade of the latter. Regarding the micro-morphology, the two species are also very similar (Chen et al. 2020, 2021). Therefore, we propose that S. pseudogunii is a synonym of S. coleopterorum. Another example of an ambiguous species is the pair S. coccinellidicola / S. guizhouensis. These two species were proposed separately from independent studies (S. coccinellidicola: Wang et al. 2022, S. guizhouensis: Chen et al. 2022); both studies identified their respective new species as a sister taxon to S. pupicola. Our phylogenetic trees suggested that S. guizhouensis could not be distinguished from S. coccinellidicola (Fig. 2). Morphologically, there were no significant differences in the morphological characteristics of anamorphs between the two species except for their host. Because S. coccinellidicola was described earlier than S. guizhouensis (19 July 2022 vs 12 September 2022), S. coccinellidicola should be recommended as the scientific name for this species in accordance with the priority of the international nominating regulations.

Because Mongkolsamrit et al. (2018) first discovered the teleomorph reproductive stage for S. inthanonensis, nine members of the genus have been described as teleomorphically typified species (Mongkolsamrit et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2020a; Wang et al. 2022). In this study, the sexual morph of S. aurantia, S. hepiali, and S. sapaensis sp. nov. were first reported. However, the observation of the teleomorph in nature is relatively rare for the majority of Samsoniella species existing as anamorphs. Due to their rarity, each teleomorph specimen is precious (Wang et al. 2020b). The teleomorph specimens of some species, such as S. hepiali, are of great economic and medical value in integrated phylogenetic, developmental, and mating studies. These studies are not only helpful in providing insight into systematic and life history studies, but they are also meaningful to prevent cultivated strains from degeneration (Rehner and Buckley 2005; Wang et al. 2020b).

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 32200013, 31870017 and 32160005).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: YW. Formal analysis: YW. Funding acquisition: HY. Investigation: VMD, CT, YW, ZQW, HY, YBW. Methodology: YW. Software: ZQW. Writing - original draft: YW. Writing - review and editing: HY.

Author ORCIDs

Yao Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1262-6700

Hong Yu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2149-5714

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Chen WH, Han YF, Liang JD, Tian WY, Liang ZQ (2020) Morphological and phylogenetic characterisations reveal three new species of Samsoniella (Cordycipitaceae, Hypocreales) from Guizhou, China. MycoKeys 74: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.74.56655
  • Chen WH, Liang JD, Ren XX, Zhao JH, Han YF, Liang ZQ (2021) Cryptic diversity of Isaria-like species in Guizhou, China. Life (Basel, Switzerland) 11(10): 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11101093
  • Chen WH, Liang JD, Ren XX, Zhao JH, Han YF, Liang ZQ (2022) Species diversity of Cordyceps-like fungi in the Tiankeng Karst region of China. Microbiology Spectrum 10(5): e01975–e22. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01975-22
  • Dai RQ, Lan JL, Chen WH, Li XM, Chen QT, Shen CY (1989) Research on Paecilomyces hepiali Chen et Dai, sp. nov. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Pekinensis 15(2): 221–224.
  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9(8): 772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109
  • Glass NL, Donaldson GC (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61(4): 1323–1330. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330.1995
  • Huang MM, Zhang JF, Pang L, Jiang Z, Wang DW (1988) Studies on immunopharmacology of Cordyceps (Fr.) Link IV. Observations on the immunosuppressive activity of artificial substance of Paecilomyces hepiali Chen. Acta Universitatis Medicinae Tongji 5: 329–331.
  • Jiang L, Bao HY, Yang M (2010) Antitumor activity of a petroleum ether extract from Paecilomyces hepiali mycelium. Acta Edulis Fungi 17(4): 58–60.
  • Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SYW, Guindon S (2012) Partitionfinder: Combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29(6): 1695–1701. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss020
  • Liu ZY, Liang ZQ, Whalley AJS, Yao YJ, Liu AY (2001) Cordyceps brittlebankisoides, a new pathogen of grubs and its anamorph, Metarhizium anisopliae var. majus. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 78(3): 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1006/jipa.2001.5039
  • Lou YQ, Liao XM, Lu YC (1986) Cardiovascular pharmacological studies of ethanol extracts of Cordyceps mycelia and Cordyceps fermentation solution. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs 17: 17–21.
  • Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, Von Haeseler A, Lanfear R (2020) IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37(5): 1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa015
  • Mongkolsamrit S, Noisripoom W, Thanakitpipattana D, Wutikhun T, Spatafora JW, Luangsa-ard J (2018) Disentangling cryptic species with isaria-like morphs in Cordycipitaceae. Mycologia 110(1): 230–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2018.1446651
  • Rehner SA, Buckley E (2005) A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-a sequences: Evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 97(1): 84–98. https://doi.org/10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Schmitt I, Crespo A, Divakar PK, Fankhauser JD, Herman-Sackett E, Kalb K, Nelsen MP, Nelson NA, Rivas-Plata E, Shimp AD, Widhelm T, Lumbsch HT (2009) New primers for promising single-copy genes in fungal phylogenetics and systematics. Persoonia 23(1): 35–40. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158509X470602
  • Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P (1994) Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87(6): 651–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/87.6.651
  • Sung GH, Hywel-Jones NL, Sung JM, Luangsa-Ard JJ, Shrestha B, Spatafora JW (2007) Phylogenetic classification of Cordyceps and the clavicipitaceous fungi. Studies in Mycology 57: 5–59. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2007.57.01
  • Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(12): 2725–2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
  • Thakur A, Hui R, Hongyan Z, Tian Y, Tianjun C, Mingwei C (2011) Pro-apoptotic effects of Paecilomyces hepiali, a Cordyceps sinensis extract on human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells in vitro. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics 7(4): 421–426. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.92007
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cyptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172(8): 4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
  • Wang DW, Huang MM (1988) Studies on immunopharmacology of Cordyceps (Fr.) Link V. Influence of artificial fermentative substance of Paecilomyces hepiali Chen on the function of T cell and its subgroup in mice. Acta Universitatis Medicinae Tongji 5: 332–334.
  • Wang YB, Yu H, Dai YD, Wu CK, Zeng WB, Yuan F, Liang ZQ (2015) Polycephalomyces agaricus, a new hyperparasite of Ophiocordyceps sp. infecting melolonthid larvae in southwestern China. Mycological Progress 14(9): 70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-015-1090-7
  • Wang LP, Xu JY, Li HC, Song LP, Yu Y, Zhang WS, Liu GM, Feng CQ (2016) The complete mitochondrial genome of Paecilomyces hepiali (Ascomycota, Eurotiomycetes). Mitochondrial DNA 27(2): 916–917. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2014.926484
  • Wang Y, Tang DX, Duan DE, Wang YB, Yu H (2020b) Morphology, molecular characterization, and virulence of Beauveria pseudobassiana isolated from different hosts. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 172: 107333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2020.107333
  • Wang YB, Wang Y, Fan Q, Duan DE, Zhang GD, Dai RQ, Dai YD, Zeng WB, Chen ZH, Li DD, Tang DX, Xu ZH, Sun T, Nguyen TT, Tran NL, Dao VM, Zhang CM, Huang LD, Liu YJ, Zhang XM, Yang DR, Sanjuan T, Liu XZ, Yang ZL, Yu H (2020a) Multigene phylogeny of the family Cordycipitaceae (Hypocreales): New taxa and the new systematic position of the Chinese cordycipitoid fungus Paecilomyces hepiali. Fungal Diversity 103(1): 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-020-00457-3
  • Wang ZQ, Wang Y, Dong QY, Fan Q, Dao V-M, Yu H (2022) Morphological and phylogenetic characterization reveals five new species of Samsoniella (Cordycipitaceae, Hypocreales). Journal of Fungi (Basel, Switzerland) 8(7): 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8070747
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (Eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic, New York, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
  • Xiang M, Tang J, Chu T, Zhang CL, Zou XL (2006) Hypoglycemic effect and mechanism study on streptozocin induced diabetes in mice by Paecilomyces hepiali Chen mycelium. Zhongguo Yiyuan Yaoxue Zazhi 26(5): 556–559.
  • Zou WP, Huang MM (1993) Primary studies on the mechanism of Paecilomyces hepiali Chen against the rejection reaction. Acta Universitatis Medicinae Tongji 22: 282–284.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Specimen information and GenBank accession numbers

Yao Wang, Zhi-Qin Wang, Chinnapan Thanarut, Van-Minh Dao, Yuan-Bing Wang, Hong Yu

Data type: docx

Explanation note: table S1. Specimen information and GenBank accession numbers for sequences used in the analyses of a five-locus (nr SSU, nr LSU, 3P_TEF, RPB1, and RPB2) dataset.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (62.76 kb)
Supplementary material 2 

Pairwise genetic distance matrix of Samsoniella species

Yao Wang, Zhi-Qin Wang, Chinnapan Thanarut, Van-Minh Dao, Yuan-Bing Wang, Hong Yu

Data type: docx

Explanation note: table S2. Pairwise genetic distance matrix of Samsoniella species for ITS sequences. table S3. Pairwise genetic distance matrix of Samsoniella species for 3P-TEF sequences. table S4. Pairwise genetic distance matrix of Samsoniella species for 5P-TEF sequences. table S5. Pairwise genetic distance matrix of Samsoniella species for RPB1 sequences. table S6. Pairwise genetic distance matrix of Samsoniella species for RPB2 sequences. table S7. Pairwise genetic distance matrix of Samsoniella species for ACT sequences. table S8. Pairwise genetic distance matrix of Samsoniella species for TUB sequences. table S9. Pairwise genetic distance matrix of Samsoniella species for MCM7 sequences.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (61.12 kb)
Supplementary material 3 

Phylogenetic tree of Samsoniella

Yao Wang, Zhi-Qin Wang, Chinnapan Thanarut, Van-Minh Dao, Yuan-Bing Wang, Hong Yu

Data type: docx

Explanation note: figure S1. Phylogenetic tree of Samsoniella based on Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis from the 5P-TEF sequences. Statistical support values (≥50%) are shown at the nodes for ML boostrap support. figure S2. Phylogenetic tree of Samsoniella based on Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis from the 3P-TEF sequences. Statistical support values (≥50%) are shown at the nodes for ML boostrap support. figure S3. Phylogenetic tree of Samsoniella based on Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis from the RPB1 sequences. Statistical support values (≥50%) are shown at the nodes for ML boostrap support. figure S4. Phylogenetic tree of Samsoniella based on Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis from the MCM7 sequences. Statistical support values (≥50%) are shown at the nodes for ML boostrap support.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (1.15 MB)
Supplementary material 4 

Highlights

Yao Wang, Zhi-Qin Wang, Chinnapan Thanarut, Van-Minh Dao, Yuan-Bing Wang, Hong Yu

Data type: docx

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (17.07 kb)
login to comment