Research Article |
Corresponding author: Wen Wang ( wangwencerc@126.com ) Corresponding author: ShuaiFei Chen ( shuaifei.chen@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Cecile Gueidan
© 2023 Wen Wang, ShuaiFei Chen.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Wang W, Chen S (2023) Identification and pathogenicity of Aurifilum species (Cryphonectriaceae, Diaporthales) on Terminalia species in Southern China. MycoKeys 98: 37-58. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.98.104719
|
The family of Cryphonectriaceae (Diaporthales) contains many important tree pathogens and the hosts are wide-ranging. Tree species of Terminalia were widely planted as ornamental trees alongside city roads and villages in southern China. Recently, stem canker and cracked bark were observed on 2–6 year old Terminalia neotaliala and T. mantaly in several nurseries in Zhanjiang City, Guangdong Province, China. Typical conidiomata of Cryphonectriaceae fungi were observed on the surface of the diseased tissue. In this study, we used DNA sequence data (ITS, BT2/BT1, TEF-1α, rpb2) and morphological characteristics to identify the strains from Terminalia trees. Our results showed that isolates obtained in this study represent two species of Aurifilum, one previously described species, A. terminali, and an unknown species, which we described as A. cerciana sp. nov. Pathogenicity tests demonstrated that both A. terminali and A. cerciana were able to infect T. neotaliala and two tested Eucalyptus clones, suggesting the potential for Aurifilum fungi to become new pathogens of Eucalyptus.
Cryphonectriaceae, fungal pathogen, Myrtle, pathogenicity, phylogenetic analysis
Cryphonectriaceae is a fungal family within the order Diaporthales. This family is well-known for containing several species that are serious pathogens of trees, causing a wide range of diseases such as blight, die-back, and cankers (
Twenty-four genera have been described in the Cryphonectriaceae (
In China, various species of Cryphonectriaceae have been found to cause diseases in plants belonging to the Myrtales order. Some of the affected hosts include Eucalyptus hybrid (
Seven of the nine families of Myrtales are commonly found in southern China, and Cryphonectriaceae has been identified as an important pathogen to Myrtales trees in previous studies (
Terminalia species are economically and ecologically important trees in southern China and are widely used for timber, medicine, and ornamental purposes (
In May 2019, disease surveys on Terminalia trees were conducted in Zhanjiang City, Guangdong Province in southern China. Sporocarps with typical characteristics of Cryphonectriaceae were observed on the surfaces of cankers on the branches, stems, and roots of Terminalia trees. In order to identify the pathogens, five experimental sites were set every 30 to 50 kilometers. Diseased bark pieces, branches, twigs, and roots bearing fruiting structures were collected and transported to the laboratory. The fruiting structures were incised using a sterile scalpel blade under a stereoscopic microscope. The spore masses were then transferred to 2% (v/v) malt extract agar (MEA) and incubated at room temperature for three to five days until colonies developed. The pure cultures were obtained by transferring single hyphal tips from the colonies to 2% MEA plates and incubated at room temperature for 7–10 days. The pure cultures are stored in the culture collection (CSF) at the Research Institute of Fast-Growing Trees (RIFT) (previous institution: China Eucalypt Research Centre, CERC), Chinese Academy of Forestry (CAF) in Zhanjiang, Guangdong Province, China.
Representative isolates were selected for DNA sequence analyses, and actively growing mycelium on MEA cultures grown for one week at room temperature was scraped using a sterilized scalpel and transferred into 2.0 mL Eppendorf tubes. Total genomic DNA was extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method described by
Based on previous research four gene regions, including internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS), two segments of β-tubulin (BT2/BT1), a partial segment of the translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF-1α) and RNA polymerase II (rpb2), were amplified and sequenced as described by
All amplified products were sequenced in both directions using the same primers that were used for the PCR amplification. Sequence reactions were performed by the Beijing Genomics Institute of Guangzhou, China. The nucleotide sequences were edited using Geneious 7.1.8 software. The sequences obtained in this study were submitted to GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
The preliminary identities of the isolates sequenced in this study were obtained by conducting a standard nucleotide BLAST search using the ITS, BT2, and BT1 sequences. The BLAST results showed that the isolates collected in this study were mainly grouped in the genus Aurifilum. Phylogenetic analyses for strains identification in the current study were conducted for both genetic and species identification.
To determine the placement of Aurifilum species, two represent strains in this study were first determined by conducting phylogenetic analyses within Cryphonectriaceae species (Table
Isolates from previous studies used in the phylogenetic analyses in the current study.
Identity | Isolate No.a,b | Host | Location | GenBank accession no. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | BT2 | BT1 | TEF | rpb2 | ||||
Amphilogia gyrosa | CMW10469T | Elaeocarpus dentatus | New Zealand | AF452111 | AF525714 | AF525707 | MN271818 | MN271782 |
CMW10470 | Ela. dentatus | New Zealand | AF452112 | AF525715 | AF525708 | MN271819 | MN271783 | |
Aurantioporthe corni | MES1001 | N/A | USA | KF495039 | N/A | KF495069 | N/A | N/A |
CTS1001 | N/A | USA | KF495033 | N/A | KF495063 | N/A | N/A | |
CMW10526 | N/A | USA | DQ120762 | AH015163 | AH015163 | N/A | N/A | |
Aurantiosacculus acutatus | CBS 132181T | Eucalyptus viminalis | Australia | JQ685514 | N/A | N/A | MN271823 | NA |
Aurantiosacculus castaneae | CFCC 52456 | Castanea mollissima | China | MH514025 | MH539688 | MH539678 | NA | MN271786 |
Aurantiosacculus eucalyptorum | CBS 130826T | Euc. globulus | Australia | JQ685515 | N/A | N/A | MN271824 | MN271785 |
Aurapex penicillata | CMW10030T | Miconia theaezans | Colombia | AY214311 | AY214275 | AY214239 | N/A | N/A |
CMW10035 | Mic. theaezans | Colombia | AY214313 | AY214277 | AY214241 | N/A | N/A | |
Aurifilum marmelostoma | CBS124928T | Terminalia mantaly | Cameroon | FJ882855 | FJ900590 | FJ900585 | MN271827 | MN271788 |
CBS124929 | Ter. ivorensis | Cameroon | FJ882856 | FJ900591 | FJ900586 | MN271828 | MN271789 | |
Aurifilum terminali | CSF10748 | Ter. neotaliala | China | MN199834 | MN258767 | MN258772 | MN258777 | OQ942878 |
CSF10757T | Ter. neotaliala | China | MN199837 | MN258770 | MN258775 | MN258780 | OQ942879 | |
Capillaureum caryovora | CBL02T | Caryocar brasiliense | Brazil | MG192094 | MG211808 | MG211827 | N/A | N/A |
CBL06 | Car. brasiliense | Brazil | MG192096 | MG211810 | MG211829 | N/A | N/A | |
Celoporthe borbonica | CMW44128T | Tibouchina grandiflora | La Réunion | MG585741 | N/A | MG585725 | N/A | N/A |
CMW44139 | Tib. grandiflora | La Réunion | MG585742 | N/A | MG585726 | N/A | N/A | |
Celoporthe cerciana | CERC 9128T | Eucalyptus hybrid tree 4 | China, GuangDong | MH084352 | MH084412 | MH084382 | MH084442 | N/A |
CERC 9125 | Eucalyptus hybrid tree 1 | China, GuangDong | MH084349 | MH084409 | MH084379 | MH084439 | N/A | |
Celoporthe dispersa | CMW 9976T | Syzygium cordatum | South Africa | DQ267130 | DQ267142 | DQ267136 | HQ730840 | N/A |
CMW 9978 | S. cordatum | South Africa | AY214316 | DQ267141 | DQ267135 | HQ730841 | N/A | |
Celoporthe eucalypti | CMW 26900 | Eucalyptus clone EC48 | China | HQ730836 | HQ730826 | HQ730816 | HQ730849 | N/A |
CMW 26908T | Eucalyptus clone EC48 | China | HQ730837 | HQ730827 | HQ730817 | HQ730850 | N/A | |
Celoporthe fontana | CMW 29375 | S. guineense | Zambia | GU726940 | GU726952 | GU726952 | JQ824073 | N/A |
CMW 29376T | S. guineense | Zambia | GU726941 | GU726953 | GU726953 | JQ824074 | N/A | |
Celoporthe guangdongensis | CMW 12750T | Eucalyptus sp. | China | HQ730830 | HQ730820 | HQ730810 | HQ730843 | N/A |
Celoporthe indonesiensis | CMW 10781T | S. aromaticum | Indonesia | AY084009 | AY084021 | AY084033 | HQ730842 | N/A |
Celoporthe syzygii | CMW 34023T | S. cumini | China | HQ730831 | HQ730821 | HQ730811 | HQ730844 | N/A |
CMW24912 | S. cumini | China | HQ730833 | HQ730823 | HQ730813 | HQ730846 | N/A | |
Celoporthe tibouchineae | CMW44126T | Tib. grandiflora | La Réunion | MG585747 | N/A | MG585731 | N/A | N/A |
CMW44127 | Tib. grandiflora | La Réunion | MG585748 | N/A | MG585732 | N/A | N/A | |
Celoporthe woodiana | CMW13936T | Tib. granulosa | South Africa | DQ267131 | DQ267143 | DQ267137 | JQ824071 | N/A |
CMW13937 | Tib. granulosa | South Africa | DQ267132 | DQ267144 | DQ267138 | JQ824072 | N/A | |
Chrysomorbus lagerstroemiae | CERC 8780 | Lagerstroemia speciosa | China | KY929330 | KY929340 | KY929350 | N/A | N/A |
CERC 8810T | Lag. speciosa | China | KY929338 | KY929348 | KY929358 | N/A | N/A | |
Chrysoporthe austroafricana | CMW 62 | Euc. grandis | South Africa | AF292041 | AF273458 | AF273063 | N/A | N/A |
CMW 9327 | Tib. granulosa | South Africa | AF273473 | AF273455 | AF273060 | N/A | N/A | |
CMW 2113T | Euc. grandis | South Africa | AF046892 | AF273462 | AF273067 | N/A | N/A | |
Chrysoporthe cubensis | CMW 10453 | Euc. saligna | Democratic Republic of the Congo | AY063476 | AY063480 | AY063478 | N/A | N/A |
CMW 10669 = CRY864 | Eucalyptus sp. | Republic of the Congo | AF535122 | AF535126 | AF535124 | N/A | N/A | |
Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis | CMW 11290 | Eucalyptus sp. | Indonesia | AY214304 | AY214268 | AY214232 | N/A | N/A |
CMW 8651 | S. aromaticum | Indonesia | AY084002 | AY084014 | AY084026 | N/A | N/A | |
Chrysoporthe doradensis | CMW 11287T | Euc. grandis | Ecuador | AY214289 | AY214253 | AY214217 | N/A | N/A |
CMW 11286 | Euc. grandis | Ecuador | AY214290 | AY214254 | AY214218 | N/A | N/A | |
Chrysoporthe hodgesiana | CMW 10625 | Mic. theaezans | Colombia | AY956970 | AY956980 | AY956979 | N/A | N/A |
CMW 9995 | Tib. semidecandra | Colombia | AY956969 | AY956978 | AY956977 | N/A | N/A | |
CMW 10641T | Tib. semidecandra | Colombia | AY692322 | AY692325 | AY692326 | N/A | N/A | |
Chrysoporthe inopina | CMW 12727T | Tib. lepidota | Colombia | DQ368777 | DQ368807 | DQ368806 | N/A | N/A |
CMW 12729 | Tib. lepidota | Colombia | DQ368778 | DQ368809 | DQ368808 | N/A | N/A | |
Chrysoporthe syzygiicola | CMW 29940T | S. guineense | Zambia | FJ655005 | FJ805236 | FJ805230 | N/A | N/A |
CMW 29942 | S. guineense | Zambia | FJ655007 | FJ805238 | FJ805232 | N/A | N/A | |
Chrysoporthe zambiensis | CMW29928T | Euc. grandis | Zambia | FJ655002 | FJ805233 | FJ858709 | N/A | N/A |
CMW29930 | Euc. grandis | Zambia | FJ655004 | FJ805235 | FJ858711 | N/A | N/A | |
Corticimorbus sinomyrti | CERC3629T | Rhodomyrtus tomentosa | China | KT167169 | KT167189 | KT167189 | N/A | N/A |
CERC3631 | Rho. tomentosa | China | KT167170 | KT167190 | KT167190 | N/A | N/A | |
Cryphonectria citrina | CBS 109758 | Punica granatum | USA | MN172407 | N/A | N/A | MN271843 | EU219342 |
Cryphonectria decipiens | CMW 10436 | Quercus suber | Portugal | AF452117 | AF525710 | AF525703 | N/A | N/A |
CMW 10484 | Castanea sativa | Italy | AF368327 | AF368349 | AF368349 | N/A | N/A | |
Cryphonectria japonica | CMW13742 | Q. grosseserrata | Japan | AY697936 | AY697962 | AY697961 | N/A | N/A |
Cryphonectria macrospora | CMW10463 | Cas. cuspidata | Japan | AF368331 | AF368350 | AF368351 | N/A | N/A |
CMW10914 | Cas. cuspidata | Japan | AY697942 | AY697974 | AY697973 | N/A | N/A | |
Cryphonectria naterciae | C0612 | Q. suber | Portugal | EU442657 | N/A | N/A | MN271844 | MN271796 |
Cryphonectria neoparasitica | CFCC 52146 | Cas. mollissima | China | MH514029 | MH539692 | MH539682 | MH539693 | N/A |
Cryphonectria parasitica | CMW 7048 | Q. virginiana | USA | AF368330 | AF273470 | AF273076 | MF442684 | N/A |
CMW 13749 | Cas. mollisima | Japan | AY697927 | AY697944 | AY697943 | N/A | N/A | |
Cryphonectria quercicola | CFCC 52140T | Q. wutaishansea | China, Shaanxi | MG866026 | MG896113 | MG896117 | N/A | N/A |
CFCC 52141 | Q. wutaishansea | China, Shaanxi | MG866027 | MG896114 | MG896118 | N/A | N/A | |
Cryphonectria quercus | CFCC 52138T | Q. aliena var. acuteserrata | China, Shaanxi | MG866024 | MG896111 | MG896115 | MN271849 | N/A |
CFCC 52139 | Q. aliena var. acuteserrata | China, Shaanxi | MG866025 | MG896112 | MG896116 | N/A | N/A | |
Cryphonectria radicalis | CMW10455 | Q. suber | Italy | AF452113 | AF525712 | AF525705 | N/A | N/A |
CMW 10477 | Q. suber | Italy | AF368328 | AF368347 | AF368347 | N/A | N/A | |
CMW 13754 | Fagus japonica | Japan | AY697932 | AY697954 | AY697953 | N/A | N/A | |
Cryptometrion aestuescens | CMW18793 | Euc. grandis | Indonesia | GQ369459 | GQ369456 | GQ369456 | N/A | N/A |
CMW28535T | Euc. grandis | North Sumatra, Indonesia | GQ369457 | GQ369454 | GQ369454 | N/A | N/A | |
Diversimorbus metrosiderotis | CMW37321 | Metrosideros angustifolia | South Africa | JQ862870 | JQ862952 | JQ862911 | N/A | N/A |
CMW37322T | Met. angustifolia | South Africa | JQ862871 | JQ862953 | JQ862912 | N/A | N/A | |
Endothia cerciana | CSF 15398 | Quercus sp. | China | OM801201 | OM685050 | OM685038 | N/A | N/A |
CSF 15420 | Quercus sp. | China | OM801208 | OM685033 | OM685045 | N/A | N/A | |
Endothia chinensis | CFCC 52144 | C. mollissima | China | MH514027 | MH539690 | MH539680 | MN271860 | N/A |
CMW2091 | Q. palustris | USA | AF368325 | AF368336 | AF368337 | N/A | N/A | |
CMW10442 | Q. palustris | USA | AF368326 | AF368338 | AF368339 | N/A | N/A | |
Holocryphia capensis | CMW37887T | Met. angustifolia | South Africa | JQ862854 | JQ862936 | JQ862895 | JQ863051 | N/A |
CMW37329 | Met. angustifolia | South Africa | JQ862859 | JQ862941 | JQ862900 | JQ863056 | N/A | |
Holocryphia eucalypti | CMW7033T | Euc. grandis | South Africa | JQ862837 | JQ862919 | JQ862878 | JQ863034 | N/A |
CMW7035 | Euc. saligna | South Africa | JQ862838 | JQ862920 | JQ862879 | JQ863035 | N/A | |
Holocryphia gleniana | CMW37334T | Met. angustifolia | South Africa | JQ862834 | JQ862916 | JQ862875 | JQ863031 | N/A |
CMW37335 | Met. angustifolia | South Africa | JQ862835 | JQ862917 | JQ862876 | JQ863032 | N/A | |
Holocryphia mzansi | CMW37337T | Met. angustifolia | South Africa | JQ862841 | JQ862923 | JQ862882 | JQ863038 | N/A |
CMW37338 | Met. angustifolia | South Africa | JQ862842 | JQ862924 | JQ862883 | JQ863039 | N/A | |
Holocryphia sp. | CMW6246 | Tib. granulosa | Australia | JQ862845 | JQ862927 | JQ862886 | JQ863042 | N/A |
Holocryphia sp. | CMW10015 | Euc. fastigata | New Zealand | JQ862849 | JQ862931 | JQ862890 | JQ863046 | N/A |
Immersiporthe knoxdaviesiana | CMW37314T | Rapanea melanophloeos | South Africa | JQ862765 | JQ862775 | JQ862785 | N/A | N/A |
CMW37315 | Rap. melanophloeos | South Africa | JQ862766 | JQ862776 | JQ862786 | N/A | N/A | |
Latruncellus aurorae | CMW28274 | Galpinia transvaalica | Swaziland | GU726946 | GU726958 | GU726958 | N/A | N/A |
CMW28276T | G. transvaalica | Swaziland | GU726947 | GU726959 | GU726959 | N/A | N/A | |
Luteocirrhus shearii | CBS130775 | Banksia baxteri | Australia | KC197024 | KC197009 | KC197015 | N/A | N/A |
CBS130776T | B. baxteri | Australia | KC197021 | KC197006 | KC197012 | N/A | N/A | |
Microthia havanensis | CMW11301 | Myr. faya | Azores | AY214323 | AY214287 | AY214251 | N/A | N/A |
CMW14550 | E. saligna | Mexico | DQ368735 | DQ368742 | DQ368741 | N/A | N/A | |
Myrtonectria myrtacearum | CMW46433T | Heteropyxis natalensis | South Africa | MG585736 | MG585734 | MG585720 | N/A | N/A |
CMW46435 | S. cordatum | South Africa | MG585737 | MG585735 | MG585721 | N/A | N/A | |
Parvosmorbus eucalypti | CERC2060 | Eucalyptus hybrid clone | China | MN258787 | MN258801 | MN258815 | MN258829 | N/A |
CERC2061T | Eucalyptus hybrid clone | China | MN258788 | MN258802 | MN258816 | MN258830 | N/A | |
Parvosmorbus guangdongensis | CERC10459 | E. urophylla hybrid clone | China | MN258798 | MN258812 | MN258826 | MN258840 | N/A |
CERC10460T | E. urophylla hybrid clone | China | MN258799 | MN258813 | MN258827 | MN258841 | N/A | |
Pseudocryphonectria elaeocarpicola | CFCC 57515 | Elaeocarpus spp. | China | ON489048 | N/A | N/A | ON456916 | ON456918 |
CFCC 57516 | Elaeocarpus spp. | China | ON489049 | N/A | N/A | ON456917 | ON456919 | |
Rostraureum tropicale | CMW9972 | Ter. ivorensis | Ecuador | AY167436 | AY167431 | AY167426 | N/A | N/A |
CMW10796T | Ter. ivorensis | Ecuador | AY167438 | AY167433 | AY167428 | N/A | N/A | |
Ursicollum fallax | CMW18119T | Coccoloba uvifera | USA | DQ368755 | DQ368759 | DQ368758 | N/A | N/A |
CMW18115 | Coc. uvifera | USA | DQ368756 | DQ368761 | DQ368760 | N/A | N/A | |
Diaporthe ambigua | CMW5587 | Malus domestica | South Africa | AF543818 | AF543822 | AF543820 | N/A | N/A |
The taxonomic positions of two methods were used for phylogenetic analyses. Maximum parsimony (MP) analyses were performed using PAUP v. 4.0 b10 (
For MP analyses, gaps were treated as a fifth character, and characters were unordered and of equal weight with 1,000 random addition replicates. A partition homogeneity test (PHT) using PAUP v. 4.0 b10 (
For ML analyses, the best nucleotide substitution model for each dataset was established using jModeltest v. 2.1.5 (
The representative isolates identified as the new species by DNA sequence analysis were grown on 2% water ager (WA), to which sterilized freshly cut branch sections (0.5–1 cm diam. 4–5 cm length) of Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis (CEPT53) branch sections were added. These fungi with branch sections on 2% WA were incubated at room temperature for 6–8 wks until fruiting structures emerged. Representative cultures are maintained in the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Centre (CGMCC), Beijing, China. Isolates linked to the type specimens connected to representative isolates were deposited in the mycological fungarium of the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (HMAS), Beijing, China, and the Collection of Central South Forestry Fungi of China (CSFF), Guangdong Province, China.
The structures that emerged on the surface of the Eucalyptus branches were mounted in one drop of 85% lactic acid on glass slides under a dissecting microscope and then embedded in Leica Bio-systems Tissue Freezing Medium (Leica Biosystems nussloch GmbH, Nussloch, Germany) and sectioned (6 μm thick) using a Microtome Cryostat Microm HM550 (Microm International GmbH, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Walldorf, Germany) at -20 °C. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia were measured after crushing the sporocarps on microscope slides in sterilized water. For the holotype specimens, 50 measurements were performed for each morphological feature, and 30 measurements per character were made for the remaining specimens.
Measurements were recorded using an Axio Imager A1 microscope (Carl Zeiss Ltd., Munchen, Germany) and an AxioCam ERc 5S digital camera with Zeiss Axio Vision Rel. 4.8 software (Carl Zeiss Ltd., Munchen, Germany). The results are presented as (minimum–) (mean – standard deviation) – (mean + standard deviation) (–maximum).
Isolates identified as new species were selected for studying culture characteristics. After the isolates were grown for 7 days on 2% MEA, a 5 mm plug was removed from each culture and transferred to the central of 90 mm MEA Petri dishes. The cultures were incubated in the dark under temperatures ranging from 5 °C to 35 °C at 5 °C intervals. Five replicate plates for each isolate at each temperature condition were prepared. Two diameter measurements, perpendicular to each other, were taken daily for each colony until the fastest-growing culture had covered the 90 mm Petri dishes. Averages of the diameter measurements at each of the seven temperatures were computed with Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, USA). Colony colors were determined by incubating the isolates on fresh 2% MEA at 25 °C in the dark after 7 days. The color descriptions of the sporocarps and colonies were according to the color charts of
In this study, inoculations were conducted on two different Eucalyptus hybrid genotypes (CEPT46 and CEPT53) and T. neotaliala to understand the pathogenicity on Eucalyptus plantations and to fulfill Koch’s postulates. The selected isolates were grown on 2% MEA at 25 °C for 10 days before inoculation. Each selected isolate was inoculated on 10 seedlings or branches of each inoculated tree, and 10 additional seedlings or branches were inoculated with sterile MEA plugs to serve as negative controls. The inoculations were conducted in August 2019, and the results were evaluated after 7 weeks by measuring the lengths of the lesions on the cambium.
Inoculations were conducted on T. mantaly and two widely planted E. grandis hybrid genotype (CEPT46, CEPT53) to fulfill Koch’s postulates and understand the pathogenicity on Eucalyptus plantations. The selected isolates were grown on 2% MEA at 25 °C for 10 d before inoculation. Each of the selected isolates was inoculated on 10 seedlings or branches of each selected tree variety, and 10 additional seedlings or branches were inoculated with sterile MEA plugs to serve as negative controls. The inoculations on seedlings of two 1-year-old Eucalyptus hybrid genotypes were conducted in the glasshouse, and the inoculations on branches of 10-year-old T. mantaly were conducted in the field. The inoculations method followed
Inoculations were conducted in August 2019 and the results were evaluated after 7 weeks by measuring the lengths (mm) of the lesions on the cambium. For re-isolations, small pieces of discolored xylem from the edges of the resultant lesions were cut and placed on 2% MEA at room temperature. Re-isolations of all seedlings/branches inoculated as negative controls and from four randomly selected trees per isolate were conducted. The identities of the re-isolated fungi were confirmed by morphological comparisons. The inoculation results were analyzed using SPSS Statistics 26 software (BM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Diseased samples from 14 trees were collected from three sites (20190523-1, 20190525-2, 20190525-3) of T. neotaliala (Fig.
Disease symptoms on Terminalia trees associated with infection by Aurifilum spp. A Terminalia neotaliala in the field B Terminalia mantaly in a nursery C the main stems and branches of T. neotaliala infected by Aurifilum species and resulted in tree death D, E sporocarps of Aurifilum species on the main stem of T. neotaliala (D), and branch of T. mantaly (E) F, G lesions developing on the branches of T. neotaliala H, I Sporocarps of Aurifilum species on the base of main stem (H) and roots of T. neotaliala (I).
Isolates sequenced and used for phylogenetic analyses, morphological studies and pathogenicity tests in the current study.
Identity | Isolate Number | Genotypea | Host | Nursery No. | Location | GPS iformation | Collector | GenBank accession No. | References | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | tub2 | tub1 | tef1 | rpb2 | |||||||||
A. terminali | CSF16295 | AAAAA | T. neotaliala | 20190523-1 | ChaTing, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°16′06.97"N, 110°5′16.8432"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912905 | OQ921705 | OQ921623 | OQ921643 | OQ921663 | This study |
A. terminali | CSF16309 | AAAAA | T. mantaly | 20190525-1 | DaJia, SuiCheng, SuiXi | 21°18′44.19"N, 110°11′46.7268"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912906 | OQ921706 | OQ921624 | OQ921644 | OQ921664 | This study |
A. terminali | CSF16310d | AAAAA | T. mantaly | 20190525-1 | DaJia, SuiCheng, SuiXi | 21°18′44.19"N, 110°11′46.7268"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912907 | OQ921707 | OQ921625 | OQ921645 | OQ921665 | This study |
A. terminali | CSF16356d | AAAAA | T. neotaliala | 20190525-3 | DiaoLou, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°15′57.006"N, 110°12′26.5824"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912908 | OQ921708 | OQ921626 | OQ921646 | OQ921666 | This study |
A. terminali | CSF16377 | AAAAA | T. mantaly | 20190525-4 | DiaoLou, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°15′57.006"N, 110°12′26.5824"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912909 | OQ921709 | OQ921627 | OQ921647 | OQ921667 | This study |
A. terminali | CSF16380 | AAAAA | T. mantaly | 20190525-4 | DiaoLou, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°15′57.006"N, 110°12′26.5824"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912910 | OQ921710 | OQ921628 | OQ921648 | OQ921668 | This study |
A. terminali | CSF16343d | AABAA | T. neotaliala | 20190525-2 | DuHao, MaZhang, MaZhang | 21°14′16.4076"N, 110°17′23.9964"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912911 | OQ921711 | OQ921629 | OQ921649 | OQ921669 | This study |
A. terminali | CSF16387 | AABAA | T. mantaly | 20190525-4 | DiaoLou, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°15′57.006"N, 110°12′26.5824"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912912 | OQ921712 | OQ921630 | OQ921650 | OQ921670 | This study |
A. terminali | CSF16388d | AABAA | T. mantaly | 20190525-4 | DiaoLou, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°15′57.006"E 110°12′26.5824"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912913 | OQ921713 | OQ921631 | OQ921651 | OQ921671 | This study |
A. cerciana | CSF16384c, d = CGMCC3.20108 | BBCBB | T. mantaly | 20190525-4 | DiaoLou, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°15′57.006"N, 110°12′26.5824"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912914 | OQ921714 | OQ921632 | OQ921652 | OQ921672 | This study |
A. cerciana | CSF16250 | BBCBB | T. neotaliala | 20190523-1 | ChaTing, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°16′06.97"N, 110°5′16.8432"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912915 | OQ921715 | OQ921633 | OQ921653 | OQ921673 | This study |
A. cerciana | CSF16251 | BBCBB | T. neotaliala | 20190523-1 | ChaTing, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°16′06.97"N, 110°5′16.8432"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912916 | OQ921716 | OQ921634 | OQ921654 | OQ921674 | This study |
A. cerciana | CSF16261b, c, d = CGMCC3.20107 | BBCBB | T. neotaliala | 20190523-1 | ChaTing, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°16′06.97"N, 110°5′16.8432"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912917 | OQ921717 | OQ921635 | OQ921655 | OQ921675 | This study |
A. cerciana | CSF16262 | BBCBB | T. neotaliala | 20190523-1 | ChaTing, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°16′06.97"N, 110°5′16.8432"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912918 | OQ921718 | OQ921636 | OQ921656 | OQ921676 | This study |
A. cerciana | CSF16267 | BBCBB | T. neotaliala | 20190523-1 | ChaTing, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°16′06.97"N, 110°5′16.8432"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912919 | OQ921719 | OQ921637 | OQ921657 | OQ921677 | This study |
A. cerciana | CSF16268 | BBCBB | T. neotaliala | 20190523-1 | ChaTing, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°16′06.97"N, 110°5′16.8432"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912920 | OQ921720 | OQ921638 | OQ921658 | OQ921678 | This study |
A. cerciana | CSF16273 | BBCBB | T. neotaliala | 20190523-1 | ChaTing, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°16′06.97"N, 110°5′16.8432"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912921 | OQ921721 | OQ921639 | OQ921659 | OQ921679 | This study |
A. cerciana | CSF16385 | BBCBB | T. mantaly | 20190525-4 | DiaoLou, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°15′57.006"N, 110°12′26.5824"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912922 | OQ921722 | OQ921640 | OQ921660 | OQ921680 | This study |
A. cerciana | CSF16351c, d | BBCBC | T. neotaliala | 20190525-3 | DiaoLou, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°15′57.006"N, 110°12′26.5824"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912923 | OQ921723 | OQ921641 | OQ921661 | OQ921681 | This study |
A. cerciana | CSF16352c, d | BBCBC | T. neotaliala | 20190525-3 | DiaoLou, LingBei, SuiXi | 21°15′57.006"N, 110°12′26.5824"E | S.F.Chen & W. Wang | OQ912924 | OQ921724 | OQ921642 | OQ921662 | OQ921682 | This study |
Phylogenetic analyses indicated that all of the Cryphonectriaceae genera formed independent phylogenetic clades with high bootstrap values (ML > 77%, MP > 100%) both in the ML and MP analyses, with the exception of Aurifilum, and strains sequenced in this study formed sub-clades (Fig.
Phylogenetic trees based on maximum likelihood (ML) analyses of combined DNA sequence dataset of combination of ITS and BT2/BT1 regions for species in Cryphonectriaceae. combination of, TEF-1α and rpb2 regions. Bootstrap values ≥ 70% for ML and MP (maximum parsimony) analyses are presented at branches as ML/MP. Bootstrap value lower than 70% are marked with *, and absent analysis value are marked with –. Isolates representing Aurifilum cerciana are in shade, and isolates obtained in this study are in bold and blue. Diaporthe ambigua (CMW55887) was used as outgroup taxon.
Further species analyses selected twenty-four Aurifilum isolates (Table
Dataset | No. of taxa | No. of bp a | Maximum parsimony | ||||||||
PIC b | No. of trees | Tree length | CI c | RI d | RC e | HI f | |||||
ITS+BT | 116 | 1465 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0 | ||
ITS | 25 | 558 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0 | ||
BT | 25 | 907 | 12 | 1 | 12 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0 | ||
TEF | 23 | 266 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0 | ||
rpb2 | 23 | 1058 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0 | ||
ITS+BT+TEF+rpb2 | 25 | 2789 | 22 | 1 | 22 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0 | ||
Dataset | Maximum likelihood | ||||||||||
Subst. model g | NST h | Rate matrix | Ti/Tv ratio i | p-inv | Gamma | Rates | |||||
ITS+BT | TPM2uf+I+G | 6 | 1.428 | 4.552 | 1.428 | 1.000 | 4.526 | 4.525 | 0.445 | 1.107 | gamma |
ITS | TrNef | 6 | 1.000 | 1.389 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 3.247 | – | 0 | – | equal |
BT | TrN | 6 | 1.000 | 2.380 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 5.893 | – | 0 | – | equal |
TEF | TrN | 6 | 1.000 | 1.989 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 4.887 | – | 0 | – | equal |
rpb2 | TrN+G | 6 | 1.000 | 4.377 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 233.189 | – | 0 | 0.055 | gamma |
ITS+BT+TEF+rpb2 | TrN | 6 | 1.000 | 2.257 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 7.842 | – | 0 | – | equal |
For each of the six datasets, the MP and ML analyses generated trees with generally consistent topologies and phylogenetic relationships among taxa. Among the trees generated by the Aurifilum spp. single loci dataset, the BT2/BT1, TEF-1α, rpb2 show that 20 isolates obtained in this study mainly grouped into two clades, one clade contained nine isolates cluster into a lineage with A. terminali, the other 11 isolates clade formed a novel monophyletic lineage that was distinct from any known Aurifilum sp., and was supported by high bootstrap values in these gene trees (Fig.
Phylogenetic trees based on maximum likelihood (ML) analyses for species in Aurifilum A ITS region B two regions of β-tublin (BT2/BT1) C TEF-1α gene region D rpb2 gene region E combination of ITS, BT2/BT1, TEF-1α and rpb2 regions. Bootstrap values ≥ 70% for ML and MP (maximum parsimony) analyses are presented at branches as ML/MP. Bootstrap value lower than 70% are marked with *, and absent analysis value are marked with –. Isolates representing A. cerciana are in shade, and isolates obtained in this study are numbered followed CSF. Celoporthe circiana (CERC9128) was used as outgroup taxon.
Among the BT2/BT1 trees, isolate CSF16343, CSF16387, CSF16388 grouped into the lineage with A. terminali, and among the rpb2 tree, isolates CSF16351, CSF16352 grouped into the novel lineage, formed a single independent branch but the bootstraps value within the clades were not significant (Fig.
Based on phylogenetic analyses and morphology characteristics, the isolates from Terminalia trees in southern China represent two distinct species in Aurifilum. Isolates CSF16295, CSF16309, CSF16310, CSF16343, CSF16356, CSF16377, CSF16380, CSF16387, CSF16388 in phylogenetic cluster with A. terminali (Fig.
the name refers to China Eucalypt Research Centre (CERC), the former institution of the Research Institute of Fast-Growing Trees (RIFT), which served as the identification site for this study on Terminalia trees disease caused by Aurifilum spp.
No ascostromata were observed on inoculated Eucalyptus branch tissue, the conidiomata on the inoculated Eucalyptus branch tissue were superficial to slightly immersed, pulvinate, globose pyriform to various shapes without necks, blight yellow when young, orange to brown when mature (Fig.
Morphological characteristics of Aurifilum cerciana A, B conidiomata on the bark C longitudinal section through conidioma showing umber stroma D prosenchymatous stromatic tissue of the conidia E paraphyses F conidiophores and conidiogenous cells G conidia H, I colony of A. cerciana on MEA after 7 days at 25 °C H front I reverse. Scal bars: 200 µm (A); 100 µm (B, C); 10 µm (D, E, F); 5 µm (G); 1 cm (H, I).
Colonies on MEA are fluffy with an uneven margin, white when young, turning pale luteous to luteous after 10 days, and reverse yellow to orange-white. Optimal growth temperature 35 °C, reaching the edge of the 90 mm plates after 7 days. No growth at 5, 10 °C. After 7 days, colonies at 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 °C reached 15.8, 45.9, 49, 50.5, and 74.4 mm, respectively.
Bark of Terminalia neotaliala.
Guangdong Province, China.
China, Guangdong Province, Zhanjiang Region, Suixi District, Chating Town (21°16′06.97″N, 110°5′16.8432″E) from branch bark of T. neotaliala tree, 23 May 2019, S. F. Chen & W. Wang, holotype, CSFF2078, HMAS350333, ex-type culture CSF16261 = CGMCC3.20107; Guangdong Province, Zhanjiang Region, Suixi District, Diaolou Town (21°15′57.006″N, 110°12′26.5824″E) from twigs of T. mantaly tree, 25 May 2019, S. F. Chen & W. Wang, CSFF2079, HMAS350334, culture CSF16384 = CGMCC3.20108.
Three species were described in the genus Aurifilum, including A. marmelostoma, A. terminali, A. cerciana. Aurifilum cerciana morphologically differs from A. terminali by the absence of conidiomatal necks (
Eight isolates representing the two species of Aurifilum identified in this study were used to inoculate seedlings of two Eucalyptus hybrid genotypes, and branches of T. neotaliala. These include four isolates in A. terminali and A. cerciana, respectively (Table
Column chart showing average lesion lengths (mm) produced by each isolate of Aurifilum on the branches of T. neotaliala (left) and two Eucalyptus hybrid genotypes (right). Eight isolates of Aurifilum were used. Vertical bars represent the standard error of the means. Different letters above the bars indicate treatments that were statistically significantly different (P = 0.05).
In this study, many Aurifilum isolates were obtained from diseased Terminalia trees in Southern China, and two species of four genotypes belonging to Aurifilum were identified from two species of Terminalia. Including the new taxon, A. cerciana sp. nov., there are fifty-seven taxa in the Cryphonectriaceae.
In the genus Aurifilum, A. marmelostoma was the first described species, which was isolated from the bark of native T. ivorensis and the dead branches of non-native T. mantaly in Cameroon (
Members of the Cryphonectriaceae are well known to occur on Myrtales in Southern China. Prior to this study, six genera, including Aurifilum, Celoporthe, Chrysoporthe, Chrysomorbus, Corticimorbus, Parvosmorbus were reported infecting trees in Combretaceae, Lythraceae, Melastomataceae and Myrtaceae (All Myrtales) in southern China (
Pathogenicity test showed that all tested Aurifilum isolates were pathogenic to mature T. neotaliala and E. grandis hybrid genotypes of CEPT53 and CEPT46 seedlings. To clarify the threat of these pathogens to Eucalyptus plantations, further inoculations on mature Eucalyptus in the field should be conducted. Variations in pathogenicity among different individuals of the same species have been observed, with some strains showing stronger pathogenicity in different hosts. This phenomenon has also been observed in previous studies (
We thank Mr. Yuxiong Zheng, Ms. Lingling Liu, Ms. Wenxia Wu, and Mr. Quanchao Wang for their assistance in collecting disease samples and in conducting inoculations. This study was initiated through the bilateral agreement between the Governments of South Africa and China and supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (China-South Africa Forestry Joint Research Centre Project; project No. 2018YFE0120900).
No conflict of interest was declared.
No ethical statement was reported.
No funding was reported.
Conceptualization: SC, WW. Data curation: SC, WW. Formal analysis: WW. Funding acquisition: SC. Investigation: WW. Methodology: WW. Project administration: SC. Software: WW. Supervision: WW, SC. Writing - original draft: WW. Writing - review and editing: WW.
ShuaiFei Chen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3920-9982
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.