Research Article |
Corresponding author: Ronald H. Petersen ( repete@utk.edu ) Academic editor: R. Henrik Nilsson
© 2016 Ronald H. Petersen, Karen W. Hughes.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Petersen RH, Hughes KW (2016) Micromphale sect. Perforantia (Agaricales, Basidiomycetes); Expansion and phylogenetic placement. MycoKeys 18: 1-122. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.18.10007
|
DNA sequences show that the traditional genus Micromphale appears to be polyphyletic. Nuclear ribosomal LSU and ITS DNA sequences place Micromphale sect. Perforantia Singer (typus sect. M. perforans) within Gymnopus, comprising a clade sister to a mixture of traditional Gymnopus taxa including G. fusipes (typus generis) plus traditional Marasmius sect. Androsacei. This study enlarges sect. Perforantia and shows that sect. Perforantia is a clade separate from those including Micromphale sect. Micromphale and sect. Rhizomorphigena. A new subsection Pinophili is proposed to include new species G. pinophilus and G. ponderosae. Eleven taxa are accepted at species rank, of which nine are proposed as new, mostly morpho-taxa.
Gymnopus , ecological species, taxonomy, new species, new subsection
While the history of the genus name Micromphale was somewhat tortuous [see
Micromphale, as legislated in 1954, now comprises three sections.
If
Several attempts to phylogenetically place Micromphale have been made. For
Based on shared taxonomic characters, both macro- and micromorphological, Micromphale sect. Perforantia may be difficult to separate from Marasmius sect. Androsacei. For example, usually overlooked, the pileipellis of basidiomata of Marasmius sect. Androsacei almost always occurs with a thin slime matrix, a feature traditionally used to define Micromphale and especially sect. Perforantia, further confusing the separation of Micromphale sect. Perforantia from Marasmius sect. Androsacei. Further, because of the peculiar pileipellis structure composed of diverticulate hyphae together with broom cell-like setulose hyphal termini, Marasmius sect. Androsacei was separated from mainstream Marasmius at genus rank as Setulipes (
Superficial similarities among basidiomata of Micromphale sect. Perforantia and Marasmius sect. Androsacei prompted the current study. Morphological examination of many collections, including micromorphology, led to suspicion that undescribed taxa occurred in North America and that a comprehensive study including both complexes was unwieldy. It seemed more efficient, therefore, to focus on sect. Perforantia, with additional reports to follow.
Abbreviation of genus names include Ma. for Marasmius and Mi. for Micromphale. Color names in quotation marks (i.e. “sayal brown”) are from Ridgway (
All microscopic examination was undertaken using two microscopes: 1) Nikon dissecting microscope (model SMZ-27) with reflected light; and 2) Olympus compound microscope (model BX60) outfitted with bright field, phase-contrast and QC (model R5) camera.
Two types of cultures were employed to produce some DNA sequences: 1) over many years, mass-germinated fresh spore prints on malt extract agar (MEA) were dissected and polyspore isolates were allowed to overgrow. These cultures were stored in test-tube MEA slants in a cold room at ca. 8 °C; 2). Recently, it was discovered that surface-sterilized sections of stipes and/or rhizomorphs readily produced vigorous dikaryon growth on agar medium. Within 48–72 hrs, this mycelial “spray” could be excised into axenic status. Isolates were allowed to cover a 60-mm Petri dish, then transferred to MEA tube slants for storage. For sequencing, small MEA blocks were used as inocula in 15 ml potato-dextrose broth (PD, Difco) and allowed to grow at room temperature. When growth had progressed sufficiently, mycelium was teased away from agar blocks and the mycelium processed for DNA extraction.
For notes on examination of individual specimens, see under Results, Taxonomic characters.
Molecular procedures: Procedures for DNA extraction from cultures or dried herbarium specimens, PCR, sequencing and processing of sequence data and analyses of sequence data are described in
Phylogenetic Analyses: PhyML analyses were carried out using GENEIOUS 8 (
In order to determine the placement of sect. Perforantia within Gymnopus s.l., a representative file of 191 Omphalotaceae nrLSU sequences including representative taxa belonging to Omphalotus, Lentinula, Gymnopus, Marasmius, and Micromphale was constructed and analyzed using PhyML in GENEIOUS. Trees were visualized in FigTree 1.4.2 (
Basidiomata: In general, stipe length versus pileus diameter can be expressed as a ratio. Such values ranged from stipe/pileus ratio of 4–5:1 (G. glabrosipes) to 8–9:1 (G. pinophilus).
Compared to most agarics, all macromorphological structures of Sect. Perforantia are quite small, and appear somewhat fragile. This is misleading, for basidiomata are quite pliant and resilient. Evidence suggests that basidiomata dry in situ and repeatedly re-expand with increased moisture, but whether viability also survives is unknown. Frequently, basidiomata are examined which exhibit myriads of spores attached to or embedded in the hymenium but with no mature basidia visible.
Pileus: In all cases, the juvenile pileus is strongly convex, maturing to Plano-convex, often with downturned margin and occasionally with evidence of small umbo. Pileus disc is usually somewhat darker than limb or especially margin, but disc colors range from medium tan to dark chocolate brown. Limb and margin are usually paler but can be unicolorous with the disc. Pileus margin is often sulcate–striate, sometimes deeply so, but this may be an effect of moisture and basidiome age.
Lamellae: In dried specimens, lamellar attachment to stipe is difficult to ascertain. Adnate attachment is typical but adnexed or decurrent attachment is also encountered. A small tell-tale character distinguishing sect. Perforantia from sect. Androsacei is lamellar color. In sect. Androsacei, lamellae are often almost as dark as the pileus, but at least in the same color series, while in sect. Perforantia, lamellae are usually off-white to dingy pale gray.
Lamellae in sect. Perforantia are often described as collariate or pseudocollariate when fresh, but in drying, lamellae secede from stipe apex and then often appear pseudocollariate. Lamellae are described below as “thin” versus “thickish,” the former indicating a sharp lamellar edge, while “thickish” indicates lamellae with more or less parallel sides and blunt edge. There seems to be no correlation between this and presence of cheilocystidia. In most instances, figures are given for “total lamellae,“ the number of lamellae reaching the pileus margin, and “through lamellae,” the number of lamellae reaching the stipe. The incidence of lamellar anastomosis or interveining is low (i.e. but see G. resinosae).
Stipe: Stipe diameter ranges considerably, usually somewhat less than one millimeter; widths given in descriptions must be noted carefully (i.e. G. fragillior, 15–35 × 0.3–0.5 mm; G. sequoiae, 20–43 × 0.7–1.5 mm), with most diameters 0.7–1 mm.
In subsect. Perforantia, vestured stipe is almost universal (i.e. G. bulliformis, G. foliiphilus, G. fragillior, G. perforans, G. quinaultii, G. sequoiae, G. sublaccatus), glabrous–shining only in G. glabrosipes. Conversely, subsect. Pinophili, composed of two taxa fruiting on Pinus needles, is characterized by glabrous–shining stipe.
Rhizomorphs: Generally reported only as present or absent, an attempt has been made here to describe rhizomorphs in more detail, especially since rhizomorphs were used to establish cultures in some taxa. In G. quinaultii and G. sublaccatus, for instance, rhizomorphs are short, stout, forming small basal pads and colonizing adjacent Thuja scales, while in other taxa rhizomorphs may be long and gracile (i.e. in G. ponderosae unbranched, in G. glabrosipes branched). Occasionally, rhizomorphs are so plentiful as to form a loose thatch. Rhizomorphs branches are usually short and spur-like.
Taste and odor: The predominance of herbarium specimens in descriptions below, often with scant or absent notes, usually make taste and odor impossible to report. A more or less typical Micromphale odor and taste, variously described as fetid or of rotten cabbage, however, seems to occur in subsect. Perforantia (i.e. G. perforans, G. sequoiae), while the pine-dwelling taxa seem to exhibit only negligible taste and odor.
Pileipellis: Traditionally, the substance which absorbs water, creating a mucoid matrix for pileipellis, pileus and lamellar tramae, subhymenium and stipe medullary tissue has been called “gelatinous.” Considering its consistency in KOH, I prefer to call it “slime.” In my observations, in the balance between sol and gel, the substance is distinctly on the side of sol. As observed, this slime is always heterogeneous, often with effete basidiospores (and often of anamorphic fungi) and shards of encrusting material.
Where observed, pileal hairs are illustrated and are rather uniform in dimensions and shape. It is quite possible that pileal hairs occur more often toward pileus margin and have been overlooked.
Presence of copious encrusting material on repent pileipellis hyphae appears to be ubiquitous across sect. Perforantia. Two variants can also be seen: 1) commonly, in addition to the slime matrix, individual hyphae can be seen to produce a thin slime sheath on which flake-like crust material rides (i.e. G. bulliformis, G. glabrosipes, G. foliiphilus, G. pinophilus, G. ponderosae, G. quinaultii); and 2) encrusting material occasional appears as annular or striped hyphal ornamentation (i.e. G. glabrosipes, G. ponderosae). Secondary septa (cloissons de retret of Boidin) are often seen, probably formed by retreating cytoplasm (i.e. G. bulliformis, G. foliiphilus, G. sequoiae, G. sublaccatus).
Diverticulate pileipellis hyphal segments are common in G. pinophilus and G. ponderosae (subsect. Pinophili), with diverticula usually dichotomous. This feature is also found in cheilocystidia of the siccus-type.
Pleurocystidia: In the past, basidioles have often been described as fusiform. In fact, such fusiform hymenial structures are more common than and of comparable dimensions as basidia, which are universally clavate. Moreover, other hymenial elements, namely basidioles, are clavate, similar to basidia but without sterigmata. Recently, the fusiform elements have been recognized as pleurocystidia and we have adopted this usage here. Illustrations are furnished for all taxa, and these pleurocystidia extend to other groups within the clade /omphalotaceae.
A peculiar feature of pleurocystidia is the vague partitioning of cell contents, in which (under PhC + 1250×) distal cell contents appear paler than contents of the rest of the pleurocystidium, but without a well-defined separating membrane (i.e. see illustrations for G. quinaultii).
Basidia: Basidia are universally clavate and are dominated by 4-sterigmate forms. Two particular features have been noted in descriptions below: 1) in most taxa, basidia and pleurocystidia remain attached to subhymenial hyphae in squash mounts. Parenthetically, subbasidial hyphae usually remain turgid after basidia and pleurocystidia collapse, with clamp connection hook cells remaining turgid and therefore producing a beaded or catenulate appearance (i.e. see illustration for G. sublaccatus), superficially resembling cheilocystidia of the mainstream Gymnopus type. In several taxa, however, basidia and pleurocystidia are easily disarticulated from subbasidial hyphae. 2) In some taxa, basidia and pleurocystidia do not collapse when effete, remaining as empty walls. This phenomenon is reminiscent of a seed-bearing ear of corn enclosed in the leaf-like husk, and has been referred to in descriptions below as “husking” (i.e. see illustration for G. sublaccatus).
Basidiospores: Across sect. Perforantia, dimensions and shapes of spores differ little. These parameters cannot be used to identify individual specimens. Moreover, all spores are inamyloid.
Cheilocystidia: Searches for cheilocystidia found three classes of results: 1) absent, seemingly the case in several taxa in sect. Perforantia. Such a conclusion runs the risk of inaccuracy, for saccate cheilocystidia, especially when small and basidiiform, are often rare or uncommon, and could be easily overlooked. 2) clavate to saccate. In G. perforans, and its subsp. transatlanticus the saccate, utriform cheilocystidia are considerably larger than basidia and so relatively easily observed. In G. bulliformis, conversely, cheilocystidia are somewhat smaller than basidia and must be judged by homogeneous contents and shapes like incandescent light bulbs. In G. sequoiae, G. pyracanthoides and G. sublaccatus, dimensions and shapes are intermediate between those above; 3) cheilocystidia of the siccus-type (stalked, clavate to branched and beset with digitate setulae, often dichotomously branched) (see illustrations for G. pinophilus, G. ponderosae).
Caulocystidia: Little variation is seen in dimensions and form of caulocystidia. Variation, however, can be seen between caulocystidia from stipe apex versus caulocystidia from the lower stipe. Those from upper stipe tend to be gnarled (see illustrations for G. bulliformis, G. foliiphilus, G. fragillior, G. quinaultii, G. sequoiae, G. sublaccatus), not rod-like or prolonged-digitate, while those from lower stipe are straight (see illustrations for G. bulliformis, G. foliiphilus, G. fragillior, G. sequoiae) and often gathered into synnematoid groups which appear hispid or barbed under a strong lens.
1 | Pileipellis composed of diverticulate hyphae and broom cell-like hyphal termini (a well-developed Rameales structure); cheilocystidia siccus-type; fruiting on needles of Pinus species | Subsect. Pinophili |
– | Pileipellis composed of repent hyphae embedded in a slime matrix; cheilocystidia (often absent) broadly clavate to utriform; fruiting on various substrata, both conifer and broad-leafed | Subsect. Perforantia |
1 | On deciduous debris; North/Central America | 2 |
– | On coniferous debris; United States/western Canada | 4 |
2 | Eastern North America | 2. G. foliiphilus |
– | Costa Rica | 3 |
3 | Pileipellis a repent layer of encrusted hyphae | 2A. G. foliiphilus var. costaricensis |
– | Pileipellis a thatch of highly diverticulate hyphae | 8. G. pyracanthoides |
4 | Fruiting on Thuja debris; Pacific Northwest... | 5 |
– | Fruiting on other conifer debris | 6 |
5 | Cheilocystidia absent. | 9. G. quinaultii |
– | Cheilocystidia present, clavate | 11. G. sublaccatus |
6 | Cheilocystidia present (but often rare) | 7 |
– | Cheilocystidia absent. | 12 |
7 | Fruiting on debris of Sequoia sempervirens; California | 10. G. sequoiae |
– | Fruiting on assorted conifer debris, but not Sequoia | 8 |
8 | Cheilocystidia siccus-type, arbuscular, setulose; fruiting on needles of Pinus sp. | 9 |
– | Cheilocystidia clavate, saccate or utriform | 10 |
9 | Fruiting on 5-needle pine (P. strobus); eastern North America | 6. G. pinophilus |
– | Fruiting on 2–3-needle pine (P. ponderosa); central to western North America | 7. G. ponderosae |
10 | Cheilocystidia saccate, larger than basidia; fruiting on conifer needles; widespread (Europe, North America) | 11 |
– | Cheilocystidia broadly clavate, not larger than basidia, fruiting on conifer needles; Pacific Northwest | 1. G. bulliformis |
11 | Europe/Scandinavia; fruiting chiefly on Picea/Abies needles (occasionally on Pinus) | 5. G. perforans |
– | Northeastern North America; fruiting chiefly on Picea and Tsuga needles | 5A. G. perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
12 | Stipe minutely vestured throughout | 3. G. fragillior |
– | Stipe glabrous–shining | 4. G. glabrosipes |
Micromphale sect. Perforantia Singer. 1948. Sydowia 2: 32.
1) Pileipellis, pileus and lamellar tramae and stipe medullary hyphae embedded in slime matrix; 2) pileipellis either: a) a layer of repent, encrusted hyphae, conspicuously clamped, usually with thickened walls (through gelatinization) and embedded in a slime matrix; or b) well-developed Rameales-structure; 3) cheilocystidia often absent, when present either clavate to utriform or siccus-type broom cell-like; 4) stipes usually less than 1 mm broad but often up to 40 mm long; ratio of pileus breadth to stipe length often large (see G. pinophilus); 5) stipe usually vestured (but see G. glabrosipes), usually appearing minutely barbed (30×); 6) lower stipe of dark, somber color, from dark sooty brown to virtually black; 6) rhizomorphs almost always present, always black, from <2–40 × 0.2–0.7 mm, branched or unbranched; 7) basidiospores without significant dimension differences; 8) species apparently more or less host-specific, fruiting on dead conifer needles or rotting deciduous leafy debris; 9) pleurocystidia consistently present, fusiform, varying somewhat in distal morphology; 10) clamp connections ubiquitous.
Antonín and Noordeloos (1997) recognized Gymnopus sect. Vestipedes subsect. Impudicae, including G. perforans, based, it would seem on the fetid odor of basidiomata of the included taxa. Later (
Molecular phylogenetic information is available for only few taxa accepted (or proposed) here. For “morpho-taxa,” some outline employed to justify their description in this paper is owed the reader. Unfortunately, almost every morphological character includes a caveat for collections which violate one or more characters. The following diagnoses are offered:
(typus auto.): Agaricus (Gymnopus) perforans Hoffm. ex Fr.
Separating characters as follows: 1) pileipellis a layer of repent, encrusted hyphae, conspicuously clamped, usually with thickened (through gelatinization) walls and usually embedded in a slime matrix; 2) cheilocystidia often absent, when present, clavate to utriform; 3) stipe usually vestured; 4) fruiting on conifer needles or broad-leafed debris.
Gymnopus pinophilus R.H. Petersen (see below)
Separating characters as follows: 1) pileipellis a well-developed Rameales structure; 2) cheilocystidia siccus-type broom cells; 3) stipes glabrous-shining; 4) fruiting on needles of Pinus; 5) discrete clade well-separated from subsect. Perforantia.
United States, Washington, Jefferson Co., Olympic National Park, Tunnel Creek, N47°46'44.19", W123°03'25.83", VIII.1975, coll F. VanDeBogart (as Ma. androsaceus), FVDB 3621 (
Bulliformis = bubble-like, referring to the appearance of cheilocystidia at lamellar edge.
1) Morpho-species (no DNA sequences available); 2) stipe vesture a loose thatch of tortuous, often-branched, thick-walled caulocystidia; 2) cheilocystidia bulbous, smooth, with homogenous contents; 3) basidial sterigmata unusually long and slender; 4) pleurocystidia sharply fusiform, with poorly-defined content partitioning; 5) pileipellis involved in slime matrix.
The description which follows is compiled from examination of dried material. Colors when fresh may vary considerably from those below.
Basidiomata (Fig.
Temperate rainforest; substrate uncertain, certainly dead conifer needles, perhaps Tsuga or Abies; mid-summer.
Pileipellis composed of three elements, all involved with a heterogeneous slime matrix (Fig.
Proposal of another species of Gymnopus (Micromphale) section Perforantia would seem problematic, especially from a region relatively rich in such taxa, but presence and uniqueness of diagnostic characters make such a proposal relatively safe. The diagnosis (above) lists characters which separate G. (Mi.) bulliformis from other members of sect. Perforantia with diminutive basidiomata.
The temperate rain-forests of the North American Pacific coastal region of United States and Canada apparently support several taxa of the androsaceoid/perforantioid complex. Loan of selected specimens (using Mycoportal as filter) under only Ma. androsaceus and Mi. perforans revealed enough new taxa to make intensive collecting worthwhile for such organisms. This might not be surprising, considering the variety of conifer trees, on the dead needles of which such diminutive basidiomata are to be found.
Separation of taxa in Micromphale sect. Perforantia is difficult. Micromphale perforans occurs in Europe and Scandinavia through northern North America, presumably continent-wide. It may be present in northeastern and western Siberia as well, but this is beyond the scope of this paper. From northern California comes M. sequoiae which closely resembles G. bulliformis but is reported as limited to dead foliage of Sequoia sempervirens. Both taxa are reported as lacking (or rare) cheilocystidia, neither taxon exhibits much differentiation in the pileipellis, and caulocystidia are quite similar, although those of M. perforans are reported as exhibiting some denser, more refringent (PhC) pigment at caulocystidial tips. Ordinarily, M. perforans exhibits a black, vestured stipe when mature, but
Attempts were made to obtain ITS sequences from both collections of G. bulliformis, both unsuccessful.
Washington, Jefferson Co., Olympic National Park, Tunnel Creek, N47°46'44.19", W123°03'25.83", VIII.1975, coll F. VanDeBogart (as Marasmius androsaceus), FVDB 3621 (
United States, Connecticut, Middlesex Co., vic. Salem, Devil’s Hopyard State Park, N41°28.937', W72°20.491', 1.IX.2013, coll RHP, TFB 14332 (
folius (Latin) = leaf; phil- (Greek) = to love; preference for broad-leafed leaves.
Similar to Gymnopus (Mi.) perforans: differing in: 1) fruiting substrate of dead deciduous leaves, most commonly Quercus; 2) unique phylogenetic placement (based on ITS sequences); 3) apparent geographic range in eastern North America.
Basidiomata (Fig.
On dead broad-leafed leaves, most often Quercus leaves, fruiting especially on midribs and petioles of both red and white oak complexes; other adventitious substrates include Acer (at least A. rubrum), Cornus, Magnolia, Rhododendron, 2-needle Pinus; Appalachian Mountain chain from New England through northern South Carolina and northern Georgia, west to Arkansas and south to Gulf Coast; late Spring through early Autumn.
Pileipellis a thin tissue involved in a slime matrix, composed of the following: 1) pileal hairs (Fig.
Gymnopus foliiphilus is the most commonly collected North American taxon in sect. Perforantia. Preliminary field identification attempts to distinguish several taxa with similar basidiomata. Substrate segregates G. androsaceus and G. perforans (conifer needles, usually Picea and/or Abies), from G. foliiphilus. Geographic distribution is less secure. Both G. androsaceus and G. perforans are found in Europe and temperate North America, while G. foliiphilus seems limited to eastern North America. From all these taxa, a mimic, Marasmius pallidocephalus, is separated from G. androsaceus with difficulty in the field, based almost solely by lack of clamp connections of the former and phylogenetic placement.
Often in collections of G. foliiphilus, evidence of some bleaching of substrate can be detected. This is not dramatic – not to pale off-white – but distinct nonetheless. The phenomenon cannot be compared to M. perforans because fallen needles of Picea/Abies naturally bleach over time.
In G. folliiphilus, stipes are almost always bicolor, upward with some avellaneous to pinkish shade, downward to dark brown and finally black toward the base (note that the very junction of stipe and lamellae is always dark brown). The relative stipe length of these colors varies considerably, with the upward avellaneous shades from only the uppermost 10% to as much as the upper 50%. To some extent, the density and quality of the stipe vesture also varies, with upper surfaces producing shorter, less setoid, hyaline caulocystidia, often with long, slender, hyaline hyphae producing a sparsely silky or wispy appearance (40×) rather different from the hispid or barbed appearance of the lower stipe caused by setoid caulocystidia often gathered into synnematous sheaves.
A seductive artifact in microscope mounts of hymenial structures are the subbasidial cells. As is typical, basidioles and basidia are produced in “bouquets” by subbasidial hyphae, which usually are tightly packed but which retain hyphal characteristics. In G. foliiphilus, subbasidial hyphae are catenulate or congestedly lobose. The result are structures which mimic the cheilocystidia of numerous Gymnopus taxa, especially in sect. Vestipedes. In G. foliiphilus (as in G. perforans), cheilocystidia are difficult to interpret, and when present, are consummately basidiiform.
Traditional generic characters are not consistent in sect. Perforantia and sect. Androsacei. For example, the pileipellis of G. androsaceus resembles a rameales structure of repent but diverticulate hyphae. Such a pileipellis is also present in Marasmiellus, taxa of which seem to belong to several relatively distantly related clades. In Micromphale, a gelatinous layer within the pileus trama can usually be demonstrated (i.e. M. foetidum, etc.), but in Micromphale sect. Perforantia the gelatinous layer is absent, but “replaced” by a thin slime matrix over and within the pileipellis.
A paper by
Desjardin (pers. comm.) indicated the possibility that Marasmius insititius Fr. (1838. Epicrisis: 386), fruiting on Quercus leaves in Sweden, might be similar to M. foliiphilus. Marasmius insititius has seen a checkered history. Recently,
Once informed of our intention to propose a new species to represent the oak-loving relative of Mi. perforans, Desjardin (pers. comm.) graciously supplied extensive notes on three specimens [DED 4329 (TN), DED 4449 (SC), DED 4477 (NC)] and numerous citations of herbarium specimens chiefly listed under Ma. epiphyllus and Ma. insititius from
UNITED STATES, Arkansas, Baxter Co., vic. Big Flat, Ozark National Forest, Leatherwood Wilderness, N36°02.4', W92°23.2', 23.X.2013, coll RHP (as M. perforans var. quercophilus), TFB 14422 (ITS,
Costa Rica, Prov. San José, km 68 on PanAmerica Highway, “Finca Jaular,” N9°39.597', W83°52.115'. 29.VI.2000, coll. RHP, TFB 9750 (
Similar to Gymnopus foliiphilus, but differing as follows: 1) pileus darker at all ages, smooth (not pebbled), not convex when young nor everted in age; 2) lamellae more numerous and lamellulae in two ranks; 3) lamellar attachment adnexed to adnate (not pseudocollariate); 4) stipe black or bicolored; 5) stipe insertion subinsititious (not insititious); 6) outer pileipellis hyphae often significantly encrusted (not smooth or with flakes).
Basidiomata (Fig.
Gymnopus foliiphilus var. costaricensis. A Basidiomata and rhizomorphs B Pileus underside showing lamellar spacing C Pleurocystidia D Basidia E Pileipellis hyphae, showing encrustation and lobose side-branches F Basidiospores. Standard bars: A = 5 mm; B = not to scale; C–E = 20 µm; F = 5 µm. TFB 9750.
Fruiting on sclerophyllous leaves (perhaps Quercus) at mid- to high-elevation; early summer.
Pileipellis an intricately interwoven layer of thin-walled, conspicuously clamped hyphae in a heterogeneous matrix of slime (including copious debris), composed of: 1) hyphae 5–15 µm diam (Fig.
Gymnopus foliiphilus var. costaricensis. Pileipellis elements. A, B Firm-walled hyphae with slime sheath and crust material on exterior of the sheath C–J Diverticulate hyphae with individual lobate outgrowths K, L Extended lobes into ribbon-like proliferations. Standard bars = 10 µm. TFB 9750.
Smooth pileus surface and encrusted pileipellis hyphae are suggestive of Gymnopus sect. Vestipedes, but obvious slime matrix points to sect. Perforantia. The vestured stipe also might point toward G. perforans or sect. Vestipedes (not toward Gymnopus sect. Androsaceus s.s.).
Traditionally, G. perforans has been accepted as quite variable in substrate. ITS phylogeny indicates separation into several species, with G. perforans s.s. limited to conifer needles (usually Picea/Abies), with segregants on dead deciduous leaves (G. foliiphilus), or needles of Pinus strobus (G. pinophilus) or P. ponderosa (G. ponderosae). Collection TFB 9750
Costa Rica, Prov. Heredia, County Barva, District San José de la Montaña, viz. Sacramento, 25.VIII.2014, JLM 2238 (
United States, Washington, Jefferson Co., Irely Lake Area, North Fork Quinault River, N47°33'47.7", W123°40'12.38", date not recorded, coll M.T. Seidl, ident. S Redhead (as Micromphale perforans), MTS 3715 (
fragillior = Latin, more fragile, referring to more diminutive stature than M. perforans.
1) A morpho-taxon (no DNA sequences available); 2) basidiomata slender (stipe 15–25 × 0.4–0.7 mm), diminutive, slender; 3) stipe base (<1 mm) with hirsute, tawny collar; 4) sterigmata stout, subcornute; 5) basidiospores broadly ellipsoid to pip-shaped (Qm =1.68); 6) stipe medullary hyphae thick-walled, not involved in slime matrix.
Basidiomata (Fig.
Pileus 6–10 mm broad, convex to plano–convex, often somewhat centrally depressed, matt, delicately tuberculate; disc (fresh) pale grey brown, (dry) “army brown” 8D5 to “sayal brown” 6C5; limb and margin (fresh) cream, (dry) “wood brown” 7C4; margin thin; pileus trama dull orange to orange–brown in Melzer’s reagent. Lamellae adnate, distant, thickish, in 2–3 tiers, weakly pseudocollariate, seceding upon drying, (fresh) pallid tan, “tilleul buff” 7B2, “olive buff” 3B3, (dry) slightly necropigmented (near “light ochraceous buff” 5A4). Stipe 15–25 × 0.3–0.5 mm, terete, equal, more or less straight, hollow, non-insititious, lightly vestured to delicately furfuraceous throughout, in contact with lamellae dark brown, apically tan to pale cream (“cinnamon buff” 6B4), downward brown, dark brown, base blackish brown (“clove brown” 6F5, “fuscous black” 6F4); stipe base (<1 mm) a minutely hispid collar, “tawny” 6C6 to “ochraceous tawny;” basal pad restricted, “tawny” 6C6; medulla thin, off-white (not white). Rhizomorphs not observed. Odor alliaceous; taste not recorded.
Known only from the holotype collection. “Scattered on outer bark of fallen tree, mostly fruiting from needles fallen on log” (teste Seidl) (perhaps Abies grandis). Seasonality unknown.
Pileipellis a repent, unoriented layer in a thin slime or gelatinous matrix with detersile encrustation material, composed of the following: 1) pileal hairs (Fig.
A pileipellis involved in slime matrix, lacking diverticulate hyphae and/or broom cell-like termini, coupled with vestured stipe, indicate placement in Gymnopus (Micromphale) sect. Perforantia. There it is distinguished from G. perforans, G. pallidocephalus and other taxa with similar characters. Unusual, however, are the scattered clusters of caulocystidia, the stipe base with delicately hispid, brown caulocystidia and pip-shaped spores. From Mycetinis salalis comb. prov, also in the moist forests of the Pacific Northwest, G. fragillior is immediately separated by spore dimensions (15–17 × 3.5–4 µm; Qm = 4.38 in the former), habitat on conifer needles (rotting wood in the former), different pileipellis structures and absence of cheilocystidia (marasmioid in M. salalis). From both G. perforans and G. pallidocephalus, which share habitat on conifer needles, G. fragillior is distinguished by non-black stipe (black, vestured and more robust in G. perforans, black and glabrous–shining in M. pallidocephalus), and common clamp connections (absent in G. pallidocephalus). Basidiomata of G. bulliformis are somewhat more robust, with pileus somewhat paler and prominent, utriform cheilocystidia (absent in G. fragillior).
United States, Washington, Jefferson Co., Irely Lake Area, North Fork Quinault River, N47°33'47.7", W123°40'12.38", date not recorded, coll M.T. Seidl, ident. S Redhead (as Micromphale perforans), MTS 3715 (
United States, Washington, Snowhomish Co., Hwy 92, Perry Creek Trail, 24.VI.1993, coll GR Walker (as Micromphale perforans),
Glabro- = Latin, smooth; pes = Latin, foot, referring to the glabrous–shining stipe.
1) A morpho-species (no DNA sequences available; 2) stipe glabrous–shining; 3) fruiting on dead Tsuga needles; 4) lamellae suffusing brown from edge when bruised or dried; 5) stipe 15–25(–50) × 0.4–1 mm, robust; 6) stipe medullary hyphae involved in slime matrix.
Basidiomata (Fig.
Fruiting on needles of Tsuga (associated with Abies); mid-summer.
Pleipellis a layer of unoriented, tightly interwoven, repent, strongly encrusted hyphae involved in a gelatinous or slime matrix; superficial hyphae 5–7.5 µm diam, thin-walled, conspicuously clamped, strongly encrusted (Fig.
Extraction of usable DNA from the two specimens examined was unsuccessful, so phylogenetic placement of G. glabrosipes remains unknown.
Pileipellis involved in slime matrix, pileus tramal hyphae with gelatinizing walls, basidia and pleurocystidial bases strongly gelatinizing and absence of cheilocystidia all are diagnostic of the Mi. perforans complex. Conversely, the glabrous–shining stipe is not characteristic of that clade.
Two pilei were assessed for diverticulate hyphae with no success. Pileipellis was the same in both.
Macromorphologically, basidiomata are reminiscent of those of Ma. thiersii, with dark chocolate brown pileus and insititious, brown–black stipe. From M. thiersii,
Although basidiospores have not been observed (in both specimens examined), basidiospores in this clade are quite uniform, and the organism’s identification is not dependent on these statistics.
Oregon, Clackamas Co., road to Mt. Hood at 2–3 mi post, 25.VI.1995, coll MT Seidl, J Roger, N Weber (as Marasmius androsaceus), MTS 4078 (
Agaricus perforans Hoffm.: S.F. Gray. 1821. Nat. Arr. Brit. Pl. 1: 622.
≡ Agaricus perforans Hoffm.: Fr. 1821. Syst. Mycol. 1: 138.
≡ Micromphale perforans (Hoffm.: Fr.) S.F. Gray. 1821. Nat. Arrang. Brit. Plants 1: 622.
≡ Marasmius perforans (Hoffm.: Fr.) Fr. 1838. Epicric. 385.
≡ Androsaceus perforans (Hoffm. : Fr.)
≡ Marasmiellus perforans (Hoffm.: Fr.) Antonín & Noordeloos. 1997. Mycotaxon 63: 366.
(fide Antonín & Noordeloos, 1997): Sweden, Medelpad, Borgsjö, Granbodsos, 31.VIII.1993, M.E. Noordeloos 93137 (L).
1) Fruiting habit on conifer needles, chiefly Picea; 2) pileipellis and subpellis involved in thin mucoid matrix; 3) stipe barbed–vestured at least in lower half; 4) pileipellis lacking diverticulate hyphae and/or broom cells; 5) clamp connections ubiquitous; 6) cheilocystidia rare, broadly saccate to utriform; 7) lamellae few, reduced.
Basidiomata (Fig.
In large troops on fallen needles of Picea, rarely also Pinus and/or Abies, in humus-rich, coniferous plantations; widespread over Europe and Scandinavia (perhaps also in Asia); July to November.
Pileipellis embedded in hyaline slime matrix, a thin ixocutis, composed of the following elements: 1) pileal hairs (Fig.
In a paper reporting on North American members of Gymnopus sect. Perforantia, inclusion of European G. perforans could be seen as counterintuitive, but not only is the European entity the name-bringer, but recognition that the North American collections are molecularly separable from the European necessitates a description of the European fungus, as above. As discussed also under G. sequoiae, the G. perforans complex seems composed of subclades with minimal base-pair percent separation. Such is the case with “European G. perforans”, which is separated from sequences from eastern North America by 1.65% bp divergence. Studies by
Finland, Etelä-Häme Prov., Lammi, Evo, Kotinen Virgin Forest, northwest part, 13.IX.1994, coll RHP, TFB 7477 (
Psurtseva, TFB 10826 (
Canada, Quebec, Quebec-Montmorency Co., vic. Beauport, “Camping Municipal de Beauport,” 46°54.022'N, 71°10.507"W, 29.VII.2006, coll E. Lickey, TFB 13319 (
trans- = Latin, on the other side of; -atlanticus = Atlantic Ocean. Referring to distribution across the Atlantic Ocean from the typical subspecies.
Differing from typical subspecies as follows: 1) basidiomata diminutive, generally shorter and slenderer; 2) spores, pleurocystidia, basidia smaller than typical; 3) cheilocystidia infrequent, smaller and less differentiated; 4) fruiting on fallen Picea, Abies and Tsuga needles;5) separable by ITS sequence from European G. perforans.
Basidiomata (Figs
Fruiting in troops on individual dead conifer needles, chiefly Picea, Tsuga and Abies (Abies amabilis, Abies balsamea, Abies fraseri, Pices glauca, Picea rubens, Tsuga canadensis, Tsuga heterophylla and other conifer needles; from high-altitude spruce/fir “islands” of southern Appalachian Mountains to Canadian Shield. (for forms fruiting on dead deciduous leaves, see under G. foliiphilus); late spring (June, southern habitats) to mid-Autumn (September).
Pileipellis involved in a slime matrix with much minute debris, composed of the following elements; 1) pileal hairs (Fig.
Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus. Pileipellis elements. A Slender hyphae with thin slime sheath and vague incrustation B Stouter hypha with conspicuous clamp connections C, D Pileipellis hyphae with secondary septa B–D Note multigranular gelatino-mucoid matrix. Standard bars = 10 µm. AV 11.06.11.
Based on direct comparison between European and northeastern North American specimens, basidiomatal dimensions seem to differ. American basidiomata are, in general, shorter with smaller pilei than European basidiomata, but basidiomata of the American collections seem distributed in two size classes, the larger and more robust of which are commensurate with Europe basidiomata.
A limited phylogenetic tree based on ITS sequences (see Fig.
In eastern North America, characters which separate G. foliiphilus fruiting on dead deciduous leaves, from G. perforans subsp. transatlanticus fruiting on conifer needles: 1) G. foliiphilus exhibits stipe vesture between villose and barbed, but G. perforans subsp. transatlanticus is distinctly spiked/barbed; 2) pileal hairs in G. foliiphilus are stouter than those of G. perforans subsp. transatlanticus, and secondarily septate (this may be an artifact); and 3) pileus surface hyphae of G. foliiphilus are often encrusted in small scabs, while those of G. perforans subsp. transatlanticus are generally smooth.
In examining numerous specimens eventually accepted as G. perforans subsp. transatlanticus, it was unforeseen that a large number of specimens originally fruited on dead Tsuga needles, a host reported as rare by
In G. perforans subsp. transatlanticus, cheilocystidia may be confused with inflated basidia and/or pleurocystidia. Some shapes of clearly swollen elements assumed to be cheilocystidia are suggestive of sterigmata (but always two – four were not seen), and occasional objects of cheilocystidial size are shaped like fat pleurocystidia (broadly fusiform). Repeated preparations from a single pileus also showed numerous cheilocystidia.
Rhizomorphs are here described as of two types. The coarser of these are present in virtually every specimen observed, while the extremely fine type were seen in perhaps 25% of the specimens. It can be doubted that the second type actually belong to subsp. transatlanticus, but without some proof, they must be described as present.
Canada, New Brunswick, vic. Alma, Fundy Prov. Park, Maple Grove Back Road, N95°35.368', W64°59.013', 20.IX.2013, coll RHP, TFB 14377 (
United States, North Carolina, Macon Co., vic. Highlands, Blue Valley Campground, N35°00'45.23", W83°09'29.33", 11.VIII.2014, coll KWH, TFB 14511 (
pino- = referring to the genus Pinus; -phil = to love, referring to habitat on the needles of Pinus.
1) Fruiting habit on needles of Pinus strobus in eastern North America; 2) pileipellis structure including occasional diverticulate hyphae and broom cell-like hyphal termini; 3) cheilocystidia of the siccus-type; 4) basidiomata with long, slender stipes and small pilei; 5) stipe glabrous–shining; 6) rhizomorphs hair-like, black, independent of basidiomata.
Basidiomata (Fig.
Gregarious on dead needles of Pinus strobus in eastern North America; summer.
Pileipellis involved in a heterogeneous slime matrix, composed of the following elements: 1) repent hyphae radially oriented, 2.5–6 µm diam, firm- to thick-walled (wall –0.7 µm thick, hyaline), firm-walled with a very thin mucoid sheath, conspicuously clamped, weakly to strongly encrusted, with encrustation appearing as vague, subtle stripes or rings with flake-like profile calluses (Fig.
Observation on TFB 14097 (
Observations of pileipellis of TFB 10459 showed that broom cell-like hyphal termini are ephemeral – apparently they wash or gelatinize away, so when they were absent from some pilei of various collections, the strongly ornamented repent hyphae remained.
Recently, TFB 14097 was established in dikaryron and monokaryon cultures and a self-cross was performed (see
On malt extract (Difco, 15 g/L) agar (Difco, Bacto, 20g/L) most SBIs produced: 1) pure white spherical hyphal masses (<1– 2 mm diam; appearing as minute “snowballs”). These structures are narrowly attached to the agar-surface mycelium and are composed of loosely interwoven hyphae with a mucoid medulla, pure white inside and out, easily crushed (like a cotton ball); and 2) minute ganglia of hyphae scattered over agar surface in mucoid matrix. SBIs include two hyphal types: 1) 4–6.5 µm diam, thin-walled, frequently septate, hardly inflated; and 2) roughly arbuscular, 1.5–2.5 µm diam, thin-walled, as though a ramealis structure but with branches longer, apparently opposite or sub-opposite.
Canada, Nova Scotia, Kejimkujik National Park, Grafton Lake Loop Trail, 5.VIII.1992, coll S.A. Gordon, TFB 5034 (
United States, California, Humboldt Co., Rte 299, Grey’s Falls Campground, N40°54.422', W123°42.420', 16.XI.1996, coll RHP, TFB 9020 (
ponderosae = Latinized, referring to Pinus ponderosa, fruiting habitat of the species.
1) fruiting on dead needles of Pinus ponderosa; 2) pileipellis with diverticulate hyphae and broom cell-like hyphal termini; 3) pileipellis broom cell-like hyphal termini and cheilocystidia arbuscular, with conspicuous stalk but hardly swollen distal portion; 4) rhizomorphs conspicuous, hairlike, curly, unbranched, –35 × 0.1–0.4 mm; 4) spores perhaps dimorphic.
Basidiomata (Figs
Fruiting on dead needles, twigs and debris of Pinus ponderosa (three-needle pine); distribution probably following distribution of Pinus ponderosa (at least California, Idaho, Washington); late autumn.
Pileipellis constructed of three elements involved in a minimal slime matrix over central areas: 1) hyphae 3–7 µm diam, firm- to thick-walled [wall 0.7–1 µm thick, subhyaline singly, pigmented dull yellow–olive brown in mass (PhC)], conspicuously clamped, strongly encrusted (Fig.
Collections accepted as four separate species (G. “scoticus” nom. prov., G. “adventitius” nom. prov., G. pinophilus, G. ponderosae) fruit on dead needles of Pinus spp. Of these, the former two are found in Gymnopus sect. Androsacei, while the latter two belong in sect. Perforantia. Both G. ponderosae and G. adventitius fruit on needles of Pinus ponderosae and superficially resemble one another. Both exhibit black, glabrous–shining stipes and dark brown pilei, but the pileipellis of G. ponderosae comprises repent, encrusted hyphae, diverticulate hyphae and broom cell-like hyphal termini, while G. adventitius pileipellis does not show diverticulate hyphae and broom cell-like hyphal termini. Moreover, stipes of G. adventitius often produces adventitious rhizomorphic structures from wounds, not seen in G. ponderosae.
The small clade comprising G. pinophilus and G. ponderosae is found sister to that of core sect. Perforantia. Pileipellis construction, which includes diverticulate hyphae and pileipellis “broom cells” is characteristic of a “Rameales structure,” indicative of sect. Androsacei, but hardly that of traditional Perforantia, although involved in minimal slime. Marasmioid cheilocystidia also separate this pine-loving alliance from sect. Perforantia. Rhizomorphs, while not typically as long as basidiome stipe, are common, obvious and arise from the same needles as basidiomata.
TENN53488-TFB5627 (Idaho, G. ponderosae) was the only representative of mating group III of “Marasmius androsaceus” by
The possibility of dimorphic spores is reported here also for G. pinophilus. Although reported for other mushroom groups (notably hygrophoroids) the cause of this phenomenon is not known in the group treated here. Basidia are uniformly 4-spored and basidia are conspicuously clamped, indicative of normal nuclear number and behavior.
United States, California, Humboldt Co., Rte 299, Grey’s Falls Campground, N40°54.422', W123°42.420', 16.XI.1996, coll RHP (as Marasmius sp.), TFB 9020 (
Costa Rica, Prov. San José, San Gerardo de Dota, Albergue de Montaña, Savegre, 9°33'2" N, 83°48'27"W, 21.VI.1995, coll RHP, TFB 7879 (
Latinized; resembling Pyracantha, referring to spike-like setulae on pileipellis broom cell-like hyphal termini.
1) A morpho-species (no DNA sequences available); 2) broom cell-like hyphal termini of pileipellis coarsely thorny; 3) subhymenial hyphae with slime sheath and flake-like encrusting material; 4) rhizomorphs well-developed, curly, sparingly branched; 5) stipe minutely pruinose overall; 6) fruiting on sclerophyllous deciduous leaves.
Basidiomata (Fig.
Known from only the type specimen; fruiting on dead sclerophyllous leaves (probably Quercus) at high elevation; summer.
Pileipellis (Fig.
Presence of slime sheaths surrounding pileus and lamellar tramae as well as the dimensions and shape of cheilocystidia are characteristic of taxa in sect. Perforantia. Conversely, pileipellis presents a very distinctive thatch of broom cell-like hyphal termini rather than repent, encrusted hyphae in a slime matrix as is seen throughout the section. Such a differentiated pileipellis might also qualify for some infrageneric groups of Marasmiellus but would be expected to be without slime deposition. Unfortunately, DNA sequences could not be produced from the only known collection, so molecular placement remains unknown.
Cheilocystidia in G. pyracanthoides resemble those of G. bulliformis (q.v.). They also resemble those described for G. trabzonensis. They may represent some stage of basidial development because basidioles also are clavate, but basidioles are present throughout the lamellae face, while the structures here described as cheilocystidia are found along the lamellar edge. No other differentiated cheilocystidial structures were observed, but some taxa in sect. Perforantia are known to lack differentiated cheilocystidia.
Slime is produced as a thin sheath surrounding individual hyphae, with ornamentation appearing as flakes riding on the exterior of the gelatinized wall. It also appears to obliterate subhymenium. Likewise, stipe medullary hyphae exist in minimal (but present) slime. There is little evidence of a slimy (or gelatinized) matrix in the pileipellis.
Costa Rica, Prov. San José, San Gerardo de Dota, Albergue de Montaña, Savegre, 9°33'2"N, 83°48'27, 21.VI.1995, coll RHP, TFB 7879 (
United States, Washington, Grey’s Harbor Co., vic Amanda Park, Forest service Rd. 2140, “Higley’s Swamp,” 16.X.1992, coll RHP & KWH, TFB 5886 (
Lake Quinault and the Quinault River, Washington, the vicinity of the holotype collection.
1) Fruiting on Thuja debris (less on associated Abies and Tsuga needles); 2) rhizomorphs short, stout, arising and terminating in small black pads; 3) stipe fuscous brown-black, vestured, especially downward; 4) pileal hairs often ornamented with annular rings; 5) pileipellis constructed of incrusted hyphae, and hyphae with gelatinizing walls; 6) cheilocystidia not observed.
Description. Basidiomata (Fig.
Fruiting on dead needles of Thuja plicata and Abies grandis; Autumn.
Pileipellis composed of the following elements: 1) pileal hairs (Fig.
G. quinaultii clearly belongs in sect. Perforantia. The vestured stipe is not black but fuscous brown. Spores are somewhat large for sect. Perforantia, and host association (Thuja/Abies) is different (not spruce/fir needles).
Based on habitat on Thuja debris, an ancillary study was made of Collybia thujina Kauffman (
Canada, British Columbia, vic. Whistler, Paradise Valley between Whistler and Squamish, 49°50'35" N, 123°09'25"W, 6.X.1990, coll RHP & LWH, TFB 3400/4 (
Micromphale sequoiae
United States, California, Mendocino Co., Jackson State Forest, junction of state roads 408 & 409, 13.XI.1982, coll & det D.E. Desjardin, DED 1740 (
(fide
Basidiomata (Figs
Scattered to gregarious on branchlets and leaves of Sequoia sempervirens; presumably throughout the range of S. sempervirens (at least northern California); October–February.
Pileipellis of inner limb up to 60 µm thick, involved in a slime matrix; slime material heterogeneous with copious crystal suspension, transparent, not totally soluble in KOH, hyaline; hyphae (Fig.
Care was taken to demonstrate all stages of basidiole maturation to demonstrate the difference between young basidioles and cheilocystidial structures. Basidioles are abundant over all of the lamellar surface and are subspherical at the earliest stage, soon becoming broadly clavate and developing a subcapitulate upper portion. Basidia remain broadly clavate throughout spore development. Contents of such structures are consistently multigranular. Although cheilocystidia are similar in dimensions and appearance, contents are homogeneous (PhC), and such structures are found only at the lamellar edge. Conversely, pleurocystidial structures are fusiform from their earliest state, merely elongating to mature size and shape. Contents are homogeneous except for a vacuolated area in midsection (perhaps nucleus; PhC).
Caulocystidia arise as side branches of stipe surface, incrusted hyphae. Early stages of caulocystidial development often bear a shagreened surface but soon becoming smooth. A unique character is the frequent internal secondary septation, as well as occurrence of a clamp connection near caulocystidial origin.
California, Humboldt Co., Redwood National Park, Davidson Rd., N41°12'51", W124°00'12", 24.X.1992, coll & det DE Desjardin, DED 5546 (
Canada, British Columbia, Victoria, Saanich Peninsula, Observatory Hill, N48.5262°, W123.422°, 4.XI.2011, coll & det O. Ceska (as Marasmius androsaceus),
sub- = Latin: less than; laccatus = Latin: appearing polished or varnished, referring to varnished appearance of dried pileus.
1) Fruiting on needles of Thuja (and Pseudotsuga); 2) cheilocystidia rare, small, clavate, smooth, without setulae; 3) stipe near ochraceous buff above, downward rusty brown; 4) pileal hairs usually smooth, rarely roughened; 5) dried pileus sublaccate; 6) pileipellis of smooth, unencrusted, repent hyphae in slime matrix; 7) rhizomorphs inconspicuous, with minute black basal pad.
Basidiomata (Fig.
Fruiting on needles of Thuja plicata, less often on Pseudotsuga menziesii; British Columbia; Autumn to early Winter.
Pileipellis involved in a slime matrix which includes detersile encrusting material, of the following elements: 1) pileal hairs (Fig.
With slime matrix covering the pileus surface and involving hymenial structures, with characteristic clavate cheilocystidia and with vestured stipe,
Basidiomata of G. sequoiae resemble those of M. sublaccatus in stature and size, but seems limited to fruiting on needles of Sequoia sempervirens in northern California. Cheilocystidia are shaped like an incandescent bulb, sometimes slightly askew, but otherwise quite typical of cheilocystidia in this taxonomic complex (compare, for example, those of G. bulliformis and of G. sequoiae). Difficult to distinguish from immature basidia, such cheilocystidia are less obscure after several sightings.
Canada, British Columbia, Queen Charlotte Islands, Burnaby Island, Section Cove, N52°24'35", W131°19'55", 8.IX.2006, coll PK Kroeger (as Marasmius androsaceus), PK 489 (
Results of molecular analyses are summarized in Figs
PhyML analysis of 191 nrLSU sequences within the Omphalotaceae using 100 bootstrap replicates. Clades were collapsed to better show broad relationships. Species names in blue represent /marasmiellus (
PhyML phylogeny of Gymnopus section perforantia based on nrITS plus nrLSU sequences. Distance measurements percent base pair differences for the ITS region only. Bootstrap support greater than 70% is given to the left of the supported node. Haplotypes are indicated as h1 or h2; clones are indicated as c1, c2, etc. North American locations are indicated by postal codes.
PhyML analysis of Gymnopus perforans and G. sequoiae ITS sequences. Distance measurements percent base pair differences for the ITS region only. Bootstrap support greater than 70% is given to the left of the supported node. Haplotypes are indicated as h1 or h2; clones are indicated as c1, c2, etc. North American locations are indicated by postal codes.
A phylogenetic analysis of only the Perforantia based on a concatenated nrITS and LSU data set is given in Fig.
An unrooted nrITS phylogeny of G. perforans and G. sequoiae plus G. sublaccatus only is given in Fig.
The members of the clade proposed as subsection Pinophili were at first included in Gymnopus sect. Androsacei, based on pileipellis structure (well-developed Rameales-structure) and cheilocystidial shape (siccus-type broom cells). It was surprising, therefore, that phylogenetic analyses showed that the clade was more closely related to sect. Perforantia than to sect. Androsacei. This may serve as cautionary for predictions concerning the larger and more complex sect. Androsacei.
Previously largely misunderstood, pleurocystidia are common and rather uniform across sect. Perforantia. At best, these structures were interpreted as basidioles, but this study repeatedly demonstrated basidioles as clavate, not fusiform. Pleurocystidia, conversely, are fusiform throughout development. More subtle is the apparent partition of pleurocystidial contents (see Fig.
The three mating groups of Ma. androsaceus revealed by
With previously undisclosed taxa reported here from the temperate rainforest of North America (i.e. G. bulliformis, G. glabrosipes, G. sublaccatus, etc.), it must be expected that additional taxa will be discovered across eastern Russia, Japan and across Canada. Likewise, ranges will be more accurately estimated when additional collections are subjected to molecular analyses.
There has been considerable discussion about the accuracy of various species concepts and the best methodology for circumscribing new species [see
Three species in this study may represent examples of situations where new species form at the geographical or ecological periphery of a species domain. Gymnopus ponderosae, is embedded within G. pinophilus and therefore does not satisfy the criteria of reciprocal monophyly for phylogenetic species (
Research was supported, in part, by NSF DEB1144974 to RHP and KWH. We also thank the following herbaria for loans:
Collections used for molecular analyses (Reviewers – GenBank numbers will be added after review)
GenBank Identifier | Name | Herbarium no | Location | ITS GenBank | LSU GenBank No. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anthracophyllim archeri | PBM2201 | na | AY745709 | ||
Anthracophyllum lateritium |
|
USA: Louisiana | na | AF261324 | |
Caripea montagnei | unknown | na | DQ449988 | ||
Caripia montagnei | JMCR.143 | 117 clades | na | AF261327 | |
Collybia hariolorum |
|
Germany | na | AY207166 | |
Conipus acervatus |
|
117 clades | na | AF223172 | |
FJ750256_7498 | Connopus acervatus |
|
Finland | GU318378 | FJ750256 |
FJ750259_7476 | Connopus acervatus |
|
Finland | GU318373-77 | FJ750259 |
FJ750261_13579h1 | Connopus acervatus |
|
USA: Idaho | GU318393 | FJ750261 |
FJ750261_13579h2 | Connopus acervatus |
|
USA: Idaho | GU318394 | FJ750261 |
Environmental sample | none | USA: New Jersey | na | AF241340 | |
Environmental sequence | Czech Republic | JX029948 | na | ||
Environmental sequence: House dust | Finland | AM901982 | na | ||
65157-13781h1 | Gymnopus aff. dryophilus |
|
Belgium | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
65157-13781h2 | Gymnopus aff. dryophilus |
|
Belgium | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
68085-14228 | Gymnopus aff. melanopus |
|
“USA:Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | deposit ITS+LSU | |
Gymnopus aff. menehune |
|
na | AY639408 | ||
Gymnopus aff. moseri |
|
na | AY639409 | ||
50162_3554 | Gymnopus afn androsaceus |
|
Australia: |
Deposit ITS+LSU | |
48443-1871 | Gymnopus afn dichrous |
|
USA: North Carolina | AF505766 | deposit |
68142-14288 | Gymnopus afn dichrous |
|
USA: Mississippi | unreadable | deposit LSU only |
56721-10009 | Gymnopus afn dichrous I |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | don’t deposit |
50299-4702 | Gymnopus androsaceus |
|
Sweden | DQ444313 | no sequence |
50308-4711 | Gymnopus androsaceus |
|
Sweden | DQ444314 | no sequence |
50317-4720 | Gymnopus androsaceus |
|
Sweden | DQ444315 | |
50321-4724 | Gymnopus androsaceus |
|
Sweden | DQ444316 | no sequence |
50378-4781 | Gymnopus androsaceus |
|
Switzerland: Maggia | deposit ITS only | no sequence |
50482-3745 | Gymnopus androsaceus |
|
Scotland | DQ444312 | deposit LSU only or ITS+LSU resequence |
50483-3746 | Gymnopus androsaceus |
|
Scotland | deposit ITS+LSU | |
53590-7259 | Gymnopus androsaceus |
|
Sweden | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
53607-7475 | Gymnopus androsaceus |
|
Finland:Etela-hame Prov. | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
53610-7472 | Gymnopus androsaceus |
|
Finland:Etela-hame Prov. | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
59594-11631 | Gymnopus androsaceus |
|
Russia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69268-14571h1 | Gymnopus androsaceus |
|
Slovakia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69268-14571h2 | Gymnopus androsaceus |
|
Slovakia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
CULTENN5021h1 | Gymnopus androsaceus | Culture only | Canada: Nova Scotia | deposit ITS+LSU | |
CULTENN5021h2 | Gymnopus androsaceus | Culture only | Canada: Nova Scotia | deposit ITS+LSU | |
CULTENN5037 | Gymnopus androsaceus | Culture only | Canada: Nova Scotia | deposit | no sequence |
CULTENN5609 | Gymnopus androsaceus | Culture only | USA: Idaho | deposit ITS+LSU | |
Gymnopus aurantipes |
|
na | AY639410 | ||
67858-14110 | Gymnopus barbipes |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | KJ416269 ITS | deposit |
Gymnopus bicolor |
|
na | AY639411 | ||
58624_11016_ | Gymnopus biformis |
|
Costa Rica | DQ450056 | deposit |
69215-14250 | Gymnopus biformis |
|
USA: Georgia | KJ416246 | KJ189568 |
KJ189567-14251 | Gymnopus biformis |
|
“USA:Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | KJ416245 | KJ189567 |
Gymnopus biformis |
|
117 clades | na | AF261336 | |
CULTENN14606 | Gymnopus brevipes | Culture only | USA: Mississippi | deposit ITS+LSU | |
51029-4548h1 | Gymnopus brevipes |
|
Puerto Rico | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
51029-4548h2 | Gymnopus brevipes |
|
Puerto Rico | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69182_14489 | Gymnopus brevipes |
|
USA: Mississippi | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69189_14498 | Gymnopus brevipes |
|
USA: Mississippi | ||
69197_14505h1 | Gymnopus brevipes |
|
USA: Mississippi | ||
69197_14505h2 | Gymnopus brevipes |
|
USA: Mississippi | ||
69310-14607 | Gymnopus brevipes |
|
USA: Alabama | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69311-DPL11763A | Gymnopus brevipes |
|
USA: Texas | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
CULTENN14594 | Gymnopus brevipes | Culture only | USA: Mississippi | deposit ITS+LSU | |
CULTENN14599 | Gymnopus brevipes | Culture only | USA: Mississippi | deposit ITS+LSU | |
54912_9087 | Gymnopus brevipes |
|
USA: Louisiana | Deposit ITS + LSU | |
Gymnopus brunneigracilis |
|
na | AY639412 | ||
61068-13063 | Gymnopus ceraceicola |
|
New Zealand | KJ416261 | no sequence |
61085-13081 | Gymnopus ceraceicola |
|
New Zealand | KJ416262 | no sequence |
61086-13082 | Gymnopus ceraceicola |
|
New Zealand | KJ416260 | no sequence |
65131-13754 | Gymnopus confluens |
|
Belgium | KP710288 | KJ189571 |
65835-13939 | Gymnopus confluens |
|
“USA, NY” | KP710284 | KJ189579 |
67864-14114 | Gymnopus confluens |
|
Germany | KP710295 | KJ189573 |
LE-BIN1178 | Gymnopus confluens | Culture only | USA: North Carolina | KP710282 | KJ189580 |
DQ457670 | Gymnopus contrarius | AFToL ID 1758 | na | DQ457670 | |
61128-12567 | Gymnopus dichrous |
|
“USA: North Carolina, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | FJ596783 | deposit |
56727-10015h1 | Gymnopus dichrous I |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | don’t deposit |
56727-10015h2 | Gymnopus dichrous I |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | don’t deposit |
60029-11601 | Gymnopus dichrous I |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | Deposit ITS+LSU | don’t deposit |
67859-14111ss1 | Gymnopus dichrous I |
|
“USA, TN, GSM” | Deposit ITS + Lsu | |
67859-14111ss2 | Gymnopus dichrous II |
|
“USA, TN, GSM” | Deposit ITS + Lsu | |
Gymnopus diminutus |
|
na | AY639413 | ||
68136-14281 | Gymnopus disjunctus |
|
“USA, MS” | KJ416253 | deposit |
60015_11786_TN_DRYOP | Gymnopus dryophilus |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | FJ596766 | deposit |
61125-12563 | Gymnopus dysodes |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Knox Co.” | deposit | FJ750265 |
59140-11039_EARLEA | Gymnopus earlea |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | DQ449994 | deposit |
060902AV01 | Gymnopus eneficola |
|
Canada: Newfoundland | KJ128267 | KJ189588 |
090926AV13 | Gymnopus eneficola |
|
Canada: Newfoundland | KJ128264 | KJ189586 |
Gymnopus erythropus |
|
Germany | na | AY207167 | |
59295-11434 | Gymnopus foetidum |
|
Austria | KJ416259 | deposit |
65806-13911 | Gymnopus foetidus |
|
“USA, NC” | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
68190-14340 | Gymnopus foetidus |
|
USA: Connecticut | deposit ITS+LSU | |
69280-14583 | Gymnopus foetidus |
|
Slovakia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69323_14618 | Gymnopus foetidus |
|
USA: Georgia | not necessary | ASM12144 |
Gymnopus foetidus |
|
Germany | na | AY207240 | |
59300_11439 | Gymnopus fusipes |
|
Austria | AF505777 | AY256711 |
69254-14558 | Gymnopus fusipes |
|
Slovakia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
Gymnopus fusipes |
|
Scotland | deposit | AF135795 | |
59217-11333 | Gymnopus fusipes |
|
France | AY256710 | deposit |
Gymnopus fusipes |
|
na | AY639414 | ||
Gymnopus gibbosus |
|
na | AY639415 | ||
Gymnopus gibbosus |
|
na | AY639417 | ||
Gymnopus indoctus |
|
na | AY639418 | ||
50704_3716 | Gymnopus inflatotrama |
|
DQ444311 | no sequence | |
52970-6520 | Gymnopus iocephalus |
|
USA: North Carolina | DQ449984 | deposit |
58988-10782 | Gymnopus juniperinus |
|
Argentina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
59540-9889 | Gymnopus juniperinus |
|
USA:Louisiana | AY256708 | deposit |
55748-9121 | Gymnopus luxurians |
|
USA: Louisiana | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
67854-14107 | Gymnopus luxurians |
|
KJ416241 | deposit | |
Gymnopus luxurians |
|
USA: North Carolina | AF505765 | AY256709 | |
Gymnopus luxurians |
|
na | AY639421 | ||
Gymnopus melanopus |
|
na | AY639422 | ||
Gymnopus menehune |
|
na | AY639423 | ||
Gymnopus menehune |
|
na | AY639424 | ||
Gymnopus menehune |
|
na | AY639425 | ||
56727_11005_G_MESOAMERICANUS | Gymnopus mesoamericanus |
|
Costa Rica | DQ450035 | deposit |
68165-14282 | Gymnopus micromphaleoides (Holotype) |
|
USA: Mississippi | KJ416243 | deposit |
68133-14278 | Gymnopus nonnullus |
|
“USA, MS” | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
Gymnopus nonnulus |
|
na | AY639426 | ||
65135-13758 | Gymnopus ocior |
|
Belgium | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
50318_4721 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. perforans |
|
Sweden | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
50319_4722h1 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. perforans |
|
Sweden | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
50319_4722h2 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. perforans |
|
Sweden | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
53579_7477 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. Perforans |
|
Finland | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
58295_10826 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. perforans |
|
Russia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
59592_11629 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. Perforans |
|
Russia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
61211_13121c2 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
Canada: Quebec | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
61211_13121c3 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
Canada: Quebec | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
61211_13121c4 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
“USA:Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
61587_13319c1 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
Canada:Quebec | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
61587_13319c2 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
Canada: Quebec | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
61587_13319c3 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
Canada:Quebec | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
61587_13319c4 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
Canada:Quebec | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
61587_13319c5 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
Canada: Quebec | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69000_14350h1 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
USA:New York | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69000_14350h2 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
USA:New York | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69042_14377 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
“Canada: New Brunswick, Fundy Provencial Park” | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69049_14384h1 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
Canada: New Brunswick | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69049_14384h2 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
Canada: New Brunswick | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69059_14395h1 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
Canada: New Brunswick | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69059_14395h2 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
Canada: New Brunswick | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69198_14348 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
USA:New York | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69307-14611 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
USA: North Carolina | bad seq | LSU only |
69318_14613h1 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
USA:Vermont | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69318_14613h2 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
USA:Vermont | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69340_14592 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus |
|
USA:New Hampshire | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
AV100918 | Gymnopus perforans subsp. transatlanticus | AV100918 (private collection) | Canada: Newfoundland | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
50540_4204 | Gymnopus peronatus |
|
DQ450017 | deposit | |
65120-13743 | Gymnopus peronatus |
|
Belgium | Deposit ITS+LSU | don’t deposit |
LE-BIN1363 | Gymnopus peronatus | Culture only | Russia | Deposit ITS and LSU | |
LE-BIN1898 | Gymnopus peronatus | Culture only | Russia: Samara area | Deposit ITS and LSU | |
Gymnopus polyphyllus |
|
117 clades | na | AF042596 | |
68144-14290 | Gymnopus pseudoluxurians holotype |
|
USA: Mississippi | deposit | KJ416242 |
50346_4749 | Gymnopus scorodonius |
|
DQ450006 | deposit | |
EU522806_MARASMIUS_SCORODONIUS | Gymnopus scorodonius | TM03_419 | Canada | na | EU522806 |
50135_4033 | Gymnopus sp. 7 (austrobrevipes) |
|
Australia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
50761_3642 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
59641_11608 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Blount Co.” | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
61274_13242 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
WTU31851 | Gymnopus sp. 5 (pallidocephalus) | WTU31851 | bad seq | deposit | |
Gymnopus sp. | JEJ.PR.213 | 117 clades | na | AF261326 | |
Gymnopus sp. | Duke: RVPR98.46 | Puerto Rico 117 clades | na | AF261333 | |
Gymnopus sp. | Duke: RV.PR.98.08 | Puerto Rico 117 clades | na | AF261334 | |
Gymnopus sp. |
|
Puerto Rico 117 clades | na | AF261335 | |
50201-4016 | Gymnopus sp. (TENN50201) |
|
Australia: Tasmania | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
58602-10494 | Gymnopus sp. (TENN58602) |
|
Costa Rica | deposit | FJ750263 |
WRW05-1170 | Gymnopus sp. (WRW05-1170) | WRW05-1170 | USA: West Virginia | deposit ITS+LSU | |
50999-4512 | Gymnopus sp. 1 (portoricensis) |
|
Puerto Rico | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
SFSU_DED8813 | Gymnopus sp. 10 (adventitius) |
|
unknown | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69325_14620h1 | Gymnopus sp. 11 (sequoiae) |
|
USA: California | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69325_14620h2 | Gymnopus sp. 11 (sequoiae) |
|
USA: California | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
UBC25212h1 | Gymnopus sp. 12 (sublaccatus) | UBC25212 | Canada: British Columbia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
UBC25212h1 | Gymnopus sp. 12 (sublaccatus) | UBC25212 | Canada: British Columbia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69267-14570h1 | Gymnopus sp. 13 (quercophilus) |
|
Slovakia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69267-14570h2 | Gymnopus sp. 13 (quercophilus) |
|
Slovakia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69320-14615 | Gymnopus sp. 13 (quercophilus) |
|
USA: California | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69321-14616 | Gymnopus sp. 13 (quercophilus) |
|
USA: California | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
SFSU25220 | Gymnopus sp. 13 (quercophilus) |
|
USA: California | deposit ITS+LSU | |
69324_14619 | Gymnopus sp. 14 (TENN69423) |
|
USA: Georgia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
55679_9031 | Gymnopus sp. 15 (frigidomarginatus) |
|
USA: California | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
53488_5627 | Gymnopus sp. 16 (ponderosae) |
|
USA: Idaho | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
CULTENN4975 | Gymnopus sp. 16. (novae-angliae) | Culture only | “USA:New York, Franklin Co.” | deposit ITS+LSU | |
50013_DED5272 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
51221_4902h1 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
USA: Georgia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
51221_4902h2 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
USA: Georgia | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
51244_4928 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
55210_8782 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
USA: South Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
55764_9166h1 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
55764_9166h2 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
56223_7243 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
57923_10364 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
65571_13875 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
65990-14048 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
67809_14063 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
68145_14291 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
USA: Mississippi | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
68183_14332 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
USA: Connecticut | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69086_14422 | Gymnopus sp. 2 (foliiphilus) |
|
USA: Arkansas | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
51233_4919 | Gymnopus sp. 3 (inflatotrama) |
|
“USA: North Carolina, Standing Indian State Park” | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
53490_4930 | Gymnopus sp. 3 (inflatotrama) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
53521-7471 | Gymnopus sp. 3 (inflatotrama) |
|
Finland | Deposit | no sequence |
CULTENN4929 | Gymnopus sp. 3 (inflatotrama) | Culture only | USA: North Carolina | deposit ITS+LSU | |
48143B-2221 |
Gymnopus sp. 4 (inflatotrama) ( |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | deposit |
51574_5256 | Gymnopus sp. 4 (pinophilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
65808_13913 | Gymnopus sp. 4 (pinophilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
67804_14059h1 | Gymnopus sp. 4 (pinophilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
67804_14059h2 | Gymnopus sp. 4 (pinophilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
67846_14097 | Gymnopus sp. 4 (pinophilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69206_14511h1 | Gymnopus sp. 4 (pinophilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69206_14511h2 | Gymnopus sp. 4 (pinophilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69212_14517 | Gymnopus sp. 4 (pinophilus) |
|
USA: North Carolina | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
52401_5610 | Gymnopus sp. 5 (palidocephalus) |
|
USA: Idaho | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
52427_5698 | Gymnopus sp. 5 (palidocephalus) |
|
USA: Washington | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
59896-11778h1 | Gymnopus sp. 5 (palidocephalus) |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | FJ596762 | deposit |
59896-11778h2 | Gymnopus sp. 5 (palidocephalus) |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | FJ596763 | deposit |
65829_13933h1 | Gymnopus sp. 5 (palidocephalus) |
|
USA: New York | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
65829_13933h2 | Gymnopus sp. 5 (palidocephalus) |
|
USA: New York | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
66344_SAT11-179-05 | Gymnopus sp. 5 (palidocephalus) |
|
“USA: TN, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | Deposit ITS + LSU | |
CULTENN5015 | Gymnopus sp. 5 (palidocephalus) | Culture only | Canada: Nova Scotia | deposit ITS+LSU | |
53683_7572 | Gymnopus sp. 6 (caulocystidiatus) |
|
New Zealand | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
53725_7589 | Gymnopus sp. 6 (caulocystidiatus) |
|
New Zealand:North Island | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
54050-7148 | Gymnopus sp. 6 (caulocystidiatus) |
|
New Zealand | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
53149_3591 | Gymnopus sp. 7 (austrobrevipes) |
|
Australia: Tasmania | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
53181_3585 | Gymnopus sp. 7 (austrobrevipes)Australia: Tasmania |
|
Australia:Tasmania | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
MICH50942 | Gymnopus sp. 8 (resinose) | MICH50942 | Deposit ITS | no sequence | |
50765-3646 | Gymnopus sp. 9 (novomundi) |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | deposit | |
50796_3677 | Gymnopus sp. 9 (novomundi) |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | ||
50812_3693 | Gymnopus sp. 9 (novomundi) |
|
USA: Georgia | deposit ITS+LSU | |
SFSU_DED5097 | Gymnopus sp. 9 (novomundi) |
|
USA: Unknown | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
68185-14334h1 | Gymnopus sp. 17 (utriformis) |
|
USA: Connecticut | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
68185-14334h2 | Gymnopus sp. 17 utriformis |
|
USA: Connecticut | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
53721_7588 | Gymnopus sp.6 (caulocystidiatus) |
|
New Zealand | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
Gymnopus speiiconicus |
|
na | AY639427 | ||
65912-13975 | Gymnopus spongiosus |
|
USA: Mississippi | Deposit ITS and LSU | |
68184_14333 | Gymnopus spongiosus |
|
USA: Connecticut | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
61138_12577 | Gymnopus subnudis |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | deposit | FJ750262 |
WRW08_462 | Gymnopus subnudis | WRW08-462 | USA: West Virginia | deposit ITS+LSU | |
Gymnopus subpruinosus |
|
na | AY639429 | ||
Gymnopus synodicus |
|
na | AY639435 | ||
Gymnopus termiticola |
|
na | AY639430 | ||
FJ750264_12836 | Gymnopus villosipes |
|
New Zealand: Fiordland | KJ416255 | FJ750264 |
Gymnopus vitellinipes |
|
na | AY639432 | ||
57787-10292ss6 | Lentinula boryana |
|
Mexico | Deposit ITS+LSU | don’t deposit |
Lentinula edodes |
|
na | AF042579 | ||
56291-8682ss2 | Lentinula raphanica |
|
USA: Louisiana | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
Marasmiellus opacus | JEJ.574 | 117 clades | na | AF261329 | |
Marasmiellus opacus | HN2270 | 117 clades | na | AF261330 | |
69322-14617 | Marasmiellus sp. |
|
USA: Georgia | not necessary | ASM12141 |
65115-13739 | Marasmiellus vaillantii |
|
“USA: Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park” | Deposit ITS+LSU | don’t deposit |
58485-5032 | Marasmius afn androsaceus |
|
Canada: Nova Scotia | Deposit ITS | no LSU sequence |
Marasmius alliaceus |
|
Germany | na | AY207234 | |
Marasmius alliaceus |
|
Russia: Caucasus Region | no sequence | AY635776 | |
Marasmius alliaceus | BRNM568 | na | AY639436 | ||
Marasmius androsaceus | HN4730 | 117 clades | na | AF261585 | |
Marasmius applanatipes |
|
na | AY639437 | ||
Marasmius copelandii |
|
na | AY639438 | ||
KJ189565-13751 | Marasmius ramealis |
|
Belgium | bad sequence | KJ189565 |
KJ189566-13755 | Marasmius ramealis |
|
Belgium | KJ416235 | KJ189566 |
Marasmius scorodonius | JEJ.586 | 117 clades | na | AF261331 | |
Marasmius scorodonius | DAOM175382 | 117 clades | na | AF261332 | |
50116_3940 | Marasmius sp. 1 (TENN50116) |
|
Australia: Tasmania | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
Micromphale foetidum | JEJ. |
117 clades | na | AF261328 | |
54057_7179 | Micromphale sp. (TENN54057) |
|
New Zealand: North Island | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
Neonothopanus eugrammus |
|
Puerto Rico | na | AF042577 | |
Neonothopanus nambi |
|
Puerto Rico 117 clades | na | AF135175 | |
Omphalotus japonicus | JM leg Murakami | Thorn Pleurotaceae no data | na | AF135172 | |
Omphalotus nidiformis | T1946.8 | 117 clades | na | AF042621 | |
DQ470816 | Omphalotus olearius | AFToL ID 1718 | na | DQ470816 | |
LE-BIN1232 | Rhodocollybia butyracea var. asema | Culture only | Russia: Lenningrad area | Deposit ITS and LSU | |
LE-BIN2526 | Rhodocollybia butyracea var. asema | Culture only | Russia | Deposit ITS and LSU | |
69033-14368h1 | Rhodocollybia butyraceae |
|
“Canada: New Brunswick, Fundy Provencial Park” | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69033-14368h2 | Rhodocollybia butyraceae |
|
“Canada: New Brunswick, Fundy Provencial Park” | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
69047-14382 | Rhodocollybia butyraceae |
|
Canada: New Brunswick | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
Rhodocollybia laulaha |
|
na | AY639441 | ||
65926-13989h1 | Rhodocollybia maculata |
|
USA: Mississippi | Deposit ITS + Lsu | |
65926-13989h2 | Rhodocollybia maculata |
|
USA: Mississippi | Deposit ITS + Lsu | |
67881-14131 | Rhodocollybia maculata |
|
Germany | Deposit ITS + Lsu | |
68088_14253 | Rhodocollybia maculata |
|
USA: Roan Mountain | Deposit ITS+LSU | |
68169-14317 | Rhodocollybia maculata |
|
USA: Connecticut | Deposit ITS+LSU |