Phylogenetic placement of Leprariacryptovouauxii sp. nov. (Lecanorales, Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota) with notes on other Lepraria species from South America

Abstract Leprariacryptovouauxii is described as a new semicryptic species similar to L.vouauxii, from which it differs geographically (South America) and phylogenetically; both species differ in nucleotide position characters in nucITS barcoding marker. Leprariaharrisiana is reported as new to South America and L.nothofagi as new to Antarctica, Bolivia, and Peru. Leprariaincana (South American records are referred to L.aff.hodkinsoniana) and L.vouauxii (most South American records are referred to L.cryptovouauxii) should be excluded at least temporarily from the lichen list of South America. All records previously referred to as L.alpina from Bolivia and Peru belong to L.nothofagi. Most of Bolivian records of L.pallida belong to L.harrisiana. Leprariaborealis and L.caesioalba should be included in L.neglecta. Leprariaachariana, L.impossibilis, and L.sipmaniana are sequenced for the first time.


Introduction
Traditionally phenotypic characters have been used to separate lichen species; however, in numerous cases DNA based phylogenetic approaches suggested relationships that differ from traditional systematics. In some groups of lichens the absence of easily recognizable morphological or chemical characters in some lineages supported by phylogenetic signal lead to description of cryptic species (for discussion see Crespo and Perez-Ortega 2009;Crespo and Lumbsch 2010). Furthermore, Vondrák et al. (2009) introduced the semicryptic species concept for taxa that cannot be diagnosed based on their morphology but are determined based on their ecology and distribution. Moreover, for taxa with limited number of phenotypical characters due to the lack of sexual structures, the morphological species concept is especially challenging in discrimination of species (e.g., Lendemer 2011aLendemer , 2013aLendemer and Hodkinson 2013).
Thalli of Lepraria consist of soredia-like granules laying directly on a substrate or on a layer of hypothalline hyphae in case of crustose species or, in species with fruticose thalli, granules are produced also on short pseudopodetia (Lendemer 2011a;Lendemer and Hodkinson 2013). The edge of crustose thalli may be diffuse or obscurely to markedly lobate (Sipman 2004;Lendemer 2011a). Secondary chemistry is one of the most important characters in the determination and taxonomy of Lepraria, as morphological characters are scarce (e.g., Tønsberg 1992; Kukwa and Flakus 2009;Saag et al. 2009;Lendemer 2011aLendemer , 2013a. However, morphology and lichen substances must be taken under consideration together when identifying lichens of this genus as some species share the same (or very similar) morphologies or secondary chemistry (Tønsberg 1992;Leuckert et al. 1995;Elix and Tønsberg 2004;Sipman 2004;Kukwa 2007, 2011;Fehrer et al. 2008;Kukwa and Flakus 2009;Saag et al. 2009;Lendemer 2013a, b;Lendemer and Hodkinson 2013).
Until recently the taxonomy of the genus has been based almost solely on morphological features and the content of secondary metabolites, and it included only those species having crustose thalli with elobate margins and lacking dibenzofurans (Laundon 1989(Laundon , 1992Tønsberg 1992). Subsequent studies demonstrated that Leproloma Nyl. ex Cromb. should also be included in Lepraria (Ekman and Tønsberg 2002;Kukwa 2002). On the other hand, Lepraria lesdainii (Hue) R.C.Harris was transferred to the newly established genus Botryolepraria Canals et al. (Canals et al. 1997), which appeared to be more closely related to Verrucariaceae in Eurotiomycetes (Kukwa and Pérez-Ortega 2010) and Lepraria moroziana Lendemer and L. obtusatica Tønsberg to Andreiomyces Hodkinson & Lendemer (Hodkinson and Lendemer 2013) within Arthoniomycetes. Also, few fruticose species previously belonging to Leprocaulon Nyl. have been transferred to Lepraria as well, but few Lepraria species to Leprocaulon and other genera (Grube et al. 2004;Bungartz et al. 2013;Lendemer and Hodkinson 2013). The status of several other species remains unsettled, especially of those containing usnic acid, as no molecular data are available for some taxa and their phylogenetic position has not yet been determined (Kukwa 2006a;Osyczka et al. 2010;Fryday and Øvstedal 2012;Orange et al. 2017).
In this paper we present new molecular data on Lepraria based on specimens collected in South America. Three species have been sequenced for the first time and sequences of other species made possible to clarify status of some taxa in Bolivia and other South American countries. Lepraria cryptovouauxii is described as new to science.

Taxon sampling
The studied specimens from South America and Antarctica are deposited in the following herbaria: C, KRAM, LPB, S, and UGDA. The measurements of thallus structures of the new species were taken in water, often with addition of ethanol. This procedure, used by Olszewska et al. (2014), reduced the hydrophobic properties of lichen substances present in the thallus and made all structures easier to observe. Ethanol was selected as it did not affect the size of the granules, which was empirically tested. The secondary chemistry of all samples was studied by thin layer chromatography (TLC) following methods by Orange et al. (2001). Confirmation of identified substances was achieved in some cases by running the extracts adjacent to an extract containing known substances.
In addition, specimens of Lepraria nothofagi Elix & Kukwa reported as Lepraria sp. 1 and sequenced by Ekman and Tønsberg (2002) were reinvestigated and their sequences, along with other sequences of Lepraria spp., were downloaded from GenBank. Their accession numbers are given in Figure 1. In the preliminary analysis we used all available sequences of Lepraria spp. for the alignment which was further reduced to representatives of each species. We excluded from the dataset very short sequences, and numerous identical or very similar sequences. Finally, each species or clade is represented by at least one or two representatives, except L. neglecta (Nyl.) Erichsen and L. finkii (de Lesd.) R.C.Harris that were better sampled due to their high variation in nucITS rDNA marker. Sequences of L. lobificans Nyl. non auct. were originally named as L. santosii Argüello & A.Crespo, but the latter name was synonymized with L. lobificans by Lendemer (2013a), and therefore the last name was used in Figure 1.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and DNA sequencing
Specimens were selected after detailed analyses of morphology and chemistry and only uncontaminated samples were used for molecular studies. Samples of all Lepraria species reported from South America by Flakus and Kukwa (2007), Flakus et al. (2011a), and Kukwa and Flakus (2009) were subjected to DNA extraction and sequencing, but nucITS rDNA sequences were obtained for only nine species. We assumed that DNA degraded in samples collected more than three years prior to DNA extraction procedure.
DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB method (Guzow-Krzemińska and Węgrzyn 2000) or the E.Z.N.A.SP Fungal DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Inc.) following manufacturer's protocol.
Fungal nucITS rDNA was amplified using the following primers ITS1F (Gardes and Bruns 1993) and ITS4A (Kroken and Taylor 2001) or ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990). The same primers were used for sequencing.
PCR was carried out in a volume of 25 µl using Color Perpetual Taq DNA Polymerase (Eurx) or StartWarm HS-PCR Mix (A&A Biotechnology) following the manufacturer's protocols. In each case 2 or 3 µl of genomic DNA was used for amplification. The following PCR cycling parameters were applied to amplify nuclear ITS region: an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 54 °C for 30 s (for ITS1F and ITS4 primers) or 52 °C for 30 s (for ITS5 and ITS4 primers), and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. In case of ITS1F and ITS4A primers the following parameters were used: an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min.
PCR products were visualized on 1% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide or SimplySafe (Eurx) dyes in order to determine DNA fragment lengths. Subsequently, PCR products were purified using High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche Diagnostic GmbH) or Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega).
The purified PCR products were sequenced using Big Dye Terminator v. 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) and primers as listed above: 1 µl of Big Dye Terminator, 2 µl of sequencing buffer, 0.5 µl DMSO with 1.5 µl (1 M) of primer, 1-4 µl of amplified products and dd H 2 O in a total reaction volume of 10 µl. Cycle sequencing profile in Eppendorf thermal cycler consisted of: 20 s of initial denaturation, followed by 25 cycles, each with denaturation at 94 °C for 15 s, annealing at 52 °C for 20 s and elongation at 60 °C for 4 min. The sequences were read in Genomed (Warsaw). Alternatively, the sequencing was performed in Macrogen (the Netherlands/ South Korea). The DNA sequences were assembled and manually adjusted in Auto Assembler v. 1.4.0 (Parker 1997) and SeaView v. 4.1 (Galtier et al. 1996;Gouy et al. 2010). The newly obtained sequences were deposited in GenBank database and their accession numbers are listed in Table 1. In case of the sequences obtained from GenBank the taxa names are followed with accession numbers. Bootstrap supports from ML analysis ≥ 70 (first value) and posterior probabilities from BA ≥ 0.95 (second value) are indicated near the branches. The newly described L. cryptovouauxii is highlighted in orange, L. vouauxii is highlighted in blue, and L. neglecta is highlighted in grey. Table 1. List of Lepraria specimens newly sequenced for this study with their nucITS rDNA GenBank Accession numbers. All samples were collected in Bolivia.

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis
The newly generated nucITS rDNA were compared to the sequences available in the GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) using BLASTn search (Altschul et al. 1990). The alignment was generated using Seaview software (Galtier et al. 1996;Gouy et al. 2010) employing muscle option followed with Gblocks selection of poorly aligned sites using less stringent parameters (Castresana 2000). In the final dataset, we analyzed 97 sequences of different Lepraria spp. The final alignment consisted of 546 unambiguous sites of which 282 were constant.
Moreover, all available sequences of Lepraria cryptovouauxii and L. vouauxii were aligned using Seaview software (Galtier et al. 1996;Gouy et al. 2010) employing muscle option and followed with trimming of terminal ends. The final alignment consisted of seven sequences and 515 sites. Then variable sites were selected and presented in Table 2. Finally, we chosen those nucleotide position characters from alignment that support the distinction of L. cryptovouauxii (Table 2).

. A A . G . T T T T . A C A G A . T A A L. cryptovouauxii 14814 A G T . A C A A . G . T T T T G A . A G A . T A A L. cryptovouauxii 17683 A G . . A . A A . G . T T T T . A C A G A . T A . L. cryptovouauxii 14848a A G . G A . A A . G . T T T T . A . A G A A T A A
and GTR+G+X models for 5.8S and ITS partitions with 10 M generations, 2 independent runs, each with four chains. The output of MrBayes was analyzed with the program Tracer v. 1.5 (Rambaut and Drummond 2007) and the initial 25% of trees were discarded as burn-in and the majority-rule consensus tree was calculated to obtain posterior probabilities (PP). Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed using RaxML HPC v. 8 on XSEDE (Stamatakis 2014) under the GTRGAMMAI model at CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al. 2010

Haplotype networks
Sequences of nucITS rDNA marker from specimens of the newly described Lepraria cryptovouauxii as well as L. impossibilis Sipman and L. sipmaniana (Kümmerl. & Leuckert) Kukwa were aligned using Seaview software (Galtier et al. 1996;Gouy et al. 2010) and the terminal ends were trimmed. The alignment consisted of 12 sequences and 530 sites. The nucITS rDNA sequences of Lepraria finkii downloaded from GenBank were aligned together with newly generated sequences of this species using Seaview software (Galtier et al. 1996;Gouy et al. 2010) and terminal ends were deleted. The final alignment consisted of 21 sequences and 464 sites.
For both datasets TCS networks (Clement et al. 2002) were created with 95% connection limit and gaps treated as missing as implemented in PopART software (http:// popart.otago.ac.nz).

Results and discussion
Twenty-one new nucITS rDNA sequences were generated from nine Lepraria species for this study (Table 1). Among them Lepraria achariana Flakus & Kukwa, L. impossibilis, and L. sipmaniana as well as the newly described L. cryptovouauxii (see taxonomic part) were sequenced for the first time.
Based on nucITS rDNA dataset, topologically congruent trees were generated using maximum likelihood method (ML; best tree likelihood LnL = −5906.670489) and Bayesian approach (BA; harmonic mean was −5936.28). In Bayesian analysis, the average standard deviation of split frequencies was 0.002901 and the average PSRF for parameter values was 1.000. The ML tree was presented in Figure 1 with added bootstrap supports (BS) from ML analysis and posteriori probabilities (PP) from BA.
The newly sequenced specimens collected in Bolivia were resolved in different clades within the phylogenetic tree of Lepraria (Fig. 1). Five sequences of L. impossibilis form a highly supported clade (100 in ML and 1 in BA), which is closely related to L. sipmaniana represented by three newly sequenced specimens (which however do not form a well-supported group), L. cryptovouauxii represented by four sequenced specimens forming a well-supported clade (96 in ML and 1 in BA) and one sequence of L. yunnaniana (Hue) Zahlbr. All those species, except L. yunnaniana which contains divaricatic acid, produce pannaric acid 6-methylester.
To better understand phylogenetic position and genetic variation of nucITS rDNA marker within group of taxa containing pannaric acid 6-methylester, we generated haplotype network for specimens of all three species (Fig. 2). Lepraria cryptovouauxii differs in at least 19 positions from L. sipmaniana and 39 positions from L. impossibilis. This analysis showed that each of the species is well separated from others; however, we observed some infraspecific variation. In our dataset the haplotypes of newly described L. cryptovouauxii differ in at least seven to 10 mutational steps from each other and in case of L. sipmaniana in five to seven steps. The lowest variation was found in L. impossibilis for which two specimens share the same nucITS rDNA haplotype while other haplotypes differ in one to five positions from each other. Our study showed that nucITS rDNA marker is variable in this group of species at the infra and interspecific levels.
Lepraria cryptovouauxii was previously assigned to L. vouauxii (Hue) R.C.Harris as it shares secondary chemistry and very similar morphology with the latter (Flakus and Kukwa 2007;Flakus et al. 2011a). Molecular data, however, have shown that four South American specimens with obscurely lobate thalli containing pannaric acid 6-methylester and thus assignable to L. vouauxii represent a very different taxon form-ing a separate clade unrelated to the three sequences of L. vouauxii obtained from European specimens (Ekman and Tønsberg 2002;Mark et al. 2016). Lepraria vouauxii is resolved in a highly supported clade (100 in ML and 1 in BA (Fig. 1). Moreover, their nucITS rDNA sequences differ in numerous positions of which some may be used as diagnostic characters to distinguish those taxa (Table 2). Lepraria cryptovouauxii and L. vouauxii can be treated as semicryptic species (Vondrák et al. 2009;Lendemer 2011a) as they differ in the distribution ranges (see the taxonomic part). Based on the new results, we assume that L. vouauxii should be at least temporarily excluded from the South American list of lichens (Table 3), but its occurrence there is not improbable (see the taxonomic part).
Lepraria impossibilis was described by Sipman (2004) as having lobate thallus, lobes with raised marginal rim, and producing pannaric acid 6-methylester and lecanoric acid. Flakus and Kukwa (2007) and Kukwa and Flakus (2009) assigned to this species also samples with thalli having diffuse margins. For our molecular analyses we used specimens with diffuse and lobate thalli and they all clustered together in a highly supported clade (100 in ML and 1 in BA) confirming that the morphology of L. impossibilis may vary and that the unique secondary chemistry is a diagnostic character.
Lepraria hodkinsoniana Lendemer was described to accommodate the material containing divaricatic acid and zeorin, which was previously referred to as L. incana (L.) Ach. in North America. Due to that, the latter species was excluded from the list of North American lichens (Lendemer 2011a). Lepraria incana was also reported from South America (Flakus and Kukwa 2007;Flakus et al. 2011aFlakus et al. , b, 2015; however, after the description of L. hodkinsoniana, we doubted it can represent the former species. Therefore, we sequenced one specimen morphologically and chemically consistent with the description of this species, but the new sequence appeared to be more closely related to the sequences of L. hodkinsoniana than to those of L. incana obtained from European specimens (Ekman and Tønsberg 2002;Schmull et al. 2011). However, the inclusion of the sequence of L. achariana (this species contains lecanoric acid as the main secondary metabolite) to the data set revealed that the latter forms a highly supported clade (100 in ML and 1 in BA) with Bolivian specimen similar to L. hodkinsoniana (Fig. 1). Due to that, we decided to name the Bolivian material with divaricatic acid and zeorin as L. aff. hodkinsoniana and additionally we propose to exclude L. incana from the list of South American lichens (Table 3). Whether the specimen of L. aff. hodkinsoniana is only a chemotype of L. achariana or represents another semicryptic species with chemistry similar to L. incana, cannot be solved now and more specimens of both, L. achariana and L. aff. hodkinsoniana, need to be sequenced. Sequence named as L. aff. incana (GenBank Acc. no. AF517890; Fig. 1) was originally assigned to L. incana (Ekman and Tønsberg 2002), but after the inclusion of L. achariana and L. hodkinsoniana to the data set, it is clear that this specimen may represent yet undescribed taxon and the whole group requires further studies.
Sample of L. rigidula (B. de Lesd.) Tønsberg collected in Bolivia clustered together with other samples of this species from Norway and Ukraine obtained from GenBank (Ekman and Tønsberg 2002;Fehrer et al. 2008) and was found to be closely related to  L. crassissima (Hue) Lettau with high support (100 in ML and 1 in BA) (Fig. 1). This finding confirms the occurrence of L. rigidula in South America (Flakus and Kukwa 2007;Flakus et al. 2015).
Lepraria nothofagi has been described from Nothofagus bark in Argentina (Flakus et al. 2011a). Here it is reported as new to Antarctica, Bolivia, and Peru, and for the first time, it is reported from rocks and terricolous bryophytes. The samples from Antarctica were previously included in the phylogeny of Lepraria by Ekman and Tønsberg (2002) as Lepraria sp. 1. The re-examination of those specimens revealed the chemistry characteristic for L. nothofagi (atranorin, strepsilin, and porphyrilic acid). The two sequences from those specimens form a highly supported clade (100 in ML and 1 in BA) with newly obtained sequence of L. nothofagi from Bolivia. That latter sample (Fig. 4D) was initially determined as L. alpina (B. de Lesd.) Tretiach & Baruffo, but the re-examination of the chemistry and morphology of this specimen as well as all other samples reported from South America by Flakus and Kukwa (2007) and Flakus et al. (2011a) revealed that they represent L. nothofagi (see the taxonomic part). Flakus and Kukwa (2007) have already pointed that the South American specimens of L. alpina studied by them had more powdery appearance than those examined from Europe. Moreover, according to Lendemer (2013b), sequences of samples with aggregate thalli containing porphyrillic acid, and thus referable to L. alpina, are nested within the L. neglecta group (Fig. 1), and the name is treated as a synonym of L. neglecta (Lendemer 2013a, b). Sequences representing members of the L. neglecta group are named in their original version in Figure 1; however, all those names are synonymous with L. neglecta (Lendemer 2013a, b). Because of that, L. borealis Lohtander & Tønsberg reported from Chile by Flakus et al. (2011a) and L. caesioalba (B. de Lesd.) J.R.Laundon reported from South America by Flakus and Kukwa (2007) and Flakus et al. (2011a) should be excluded from the lists of lichens occurring in South America and placed as synonyms of L. neglecta (Table 3).
Lepraria harrisiana Lendemer is reported in this paper as new to South America. The specimen of L. harrisiana used in phylogenetic analyses was at first assigned to L. pallida Sipman to which it is chemically similar in producing atranorin, zeorin, and fatty acids (Sipman 2004;Lendemer 2012). However, molecular data placed this specimen in the same highly supported clade (100 in ML and 1 in BA) with L. harrisiana from North America. Revision of Bolivian material previously assigned to L. pallida by Flakus and Kukwa (2007) and Flakus et al. (2011aFlakus et al. ( , 2015 revealed that most Bolivian specimens of this species belong to L. harrisiana (Table 3), but one sample represents L. pallida s. str. (see taxonomic part).
Additionally, four specimens of L. finkii from Bolivia were sequenced and were found to belong to a highly supported clade (100 in ML and 1 in BA) together with L. finkii specimens from GenBank (Fig. 1). The specimens resolved in this clade were collected in different geographical areas, i.e. South America (Bolivia), North America (Canada and USA), and Europe (Norway and Switzerland). This clade clusters together genetically highly variable specimens. Haplotypes of L. finkii from Bolivia are unique and significantly differ from each other and other haplotypes (Fig. 3). The haplotype identified in specimen Kukwa 19459 differs from other known haplotypes in at least 24 mutational steps. The haplotype identified in specimen Kukwa 18069a is most similar to European records (Norway and Switzerland), from which it differs in five or six sites, respectively. Sequences from specimens Kukwa 11233 and Flakus 11828 are most similar to North American haplotypes (Canada and USA), from which they differ in at least seven or two positions, respectively. Those Bolivian specimens may represent cryptic taxa; however, this requires further study, which is beyond the scope of this paper.  Description. Thallus crustose, continuous, leprose, placodioid, up to 0.4 mm thick, distinctly grey-yellow, orange-yellow to brownish orange in colour; crisped margins absent, but some parts obscurely lobate; prothallus disappearing with age; hypothallus as layer of densely intertwined hyphae, hyphae hyaline, c. 3 µm wide; rhizohyphae present, brown pigmented, 3-3.5 µm wide; granules globose or subglobose, 20-70 µm in diameter, discrete, ecorticate, with outer part consisting of incomplete layer of hyphae (c. 3 µm wide) and incrusted with irregular groups of crystals insoluble in K, granules often forming compound units up to 100 µm in diameter (in one sample, Flakus 17682, up to c. 300 µm, Fig. 4C).
Habitat and distribution. Lepraria cryptovouauxii grows on soil, rocks, or terricolous and saxicolous bryophytes in open and dry to moderately humid habitats at elevations between c. 3350 and 4790 m a.s.l.
Molecular data are available only for four Bolivian samples, but, judging on the basis of the ecological characteristic of other specimens and the altitudes they were collected in South America, we assume that L. cryptovouauxii occurs also in Chile, Ecuador, and Peru; the previous terricolous, muscicolous, or saxicolous records from the high Andes in South America belong here (Laundon 1989;Leuckert and Kümmerling 1991;Flakus and Kukwa 2007;Flakus et al. 2011aFlakus et al. , 2015. Few specimens with the same chemistry and similar morphology were collected on wood and tree bark (Flakus 7872, 8381;see Flakus and Kukwa 2007, Flakus 18440 and Kukwa 16829 collected in Dept. Tarija) are excluded from specimen list of L. cryptovouauxii due to the different habitat (cloud forests) and lower altitudes (up to c. 2300 m a.s.l.) on which they were collected. They may represent L. vouauxii or another undescribed taxon, but their nucITS sequences have not been obtained yet.
Etymology. The name refers to the similarity in morphology and secondary chemistry to Lepraria vouauxii. Notes. Lepraria cryptovouauxii and L. vouauxii are practically indistinguishable in morphology and secondary chemistry. The only difference we could observe is the colour of thallus, which is more intensively orange-yellow in L. cryptovouauxii, while L. vouauxii tends to be more greyish green. However, Lendemer (2013a) mentioned similar more distinctly coloured specimens for L. vouauxii in material from North America. Whether those samples represent another yet undescribed species has not been resolved. The brighter colour observed in L. cryptovouauxii can be caused by a higher concentration of dibenzofurans which may act as a sunscreen in the very sunny habitats of the Andes. Similar tendency was observed also for L. diffusa (J.R.Laundon) Kukwa, in which thalli were more intensively coloured in sunny places in comparison to samples from shaded situations (Kukwa 2006b). Dibenzofurans, when in high concentration, can have a colour visible on TLC plates (before spraying with sulphuric acid), which suggest that they may play a sunscreen role as other pigmented substances and determine the colour of thallus (Kukwa 2006b).
According to Lendemer (2013a), L. vouauxii lacks brown rhizohyphae, which are present in the new species. To confirm this character as a possible discriminating feature, several specimens of L. vouauxii were studied to check the colour of rhizohyphae. We found that, similar to L. cryptovouauxii, rhizohyphae can be brown, but in some specimens they were very sparse, in some formed well-visible layer between the thallus and substrate, but some thalli lacked those hyphae. Tønsberg (1992) also mentioned the presence of brown rhizohyphae (as hypothallus). Apparently, L. vouauxii shows variation in the development and colour of this structure.
Despite the lack of morphological and chemical differences, L. cryptovouauxii can be distinguished on the basis of its distribution as it occurs in the high Andes in South America, whereas L. vouauxii remains unconfirmed from South America and genetically known only from Europe ( Fig. 1; Ekman and Tønsberg 2002;Mark et al. 2016). The habitat preferences also differ to some extent as L. cryptovouauxii grows only on soil, rocks, or saxicolous and terricolous bryophytes, whereas L. vouauxii occurs on various substrates, including tree bark, rocks, and soil (Tønsberg 1992;Kukwa 2006b;Flakus and Kukwa 2007;Lendemer 2013a).