11urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:C004A564-9D6A-5F9F-B058-6A3815DFE9C3MycoKeysMC1314-40571314-4049Pensoft Publishers10.3897/mycokeys.50.3265332653Research ArticleAscomycotaOphiostomatalesTaxonomyAsiaDifferential patterns of ophiostomatoid fungal communities associated with three sympatric Tomicus species infesting pines in south-western China, with a description of four new speciesMin WangHui1WangZheng1LiuFu1Xu WuCheng1Fang ZhangSu1KongXiang Bo1DecockCony2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1908-385XLuQuan1luquan@caf.ac.cnhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6007-2677ZhangZhen1zhangzhen@caf.ac.cnKey Laboratory of Forest Protection, National Forestry and Grassland Administration; Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaResearch Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of ForestryBeijingChinaMycothèque de l’Université Catholique de Louvain (BCCM/MUCL), Earth and Life Institute, Microbiology, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumMycothèque de l’Université Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
Corresponding author: Zhen Zhang (zhangzhen@caf.ac.cn); Quan Lu (luquan@caf.ac.cn)
Academic editor: Kevin Hyde
2019090420195093133FFF36376-FF86-FFBE-B07D-4B36FF9CFF8B26428762712201809032019Wang HuiMin, Zheng Wang, Fu Liu, Cheng Xu Wu, Su Fang Zhang, Xiang Bo Kong, Cony Decock, Quan Lu, Zhen ZhangThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Bark beetles and their associated fungi, which cause forest decline and sometimes high mortality in large areas around the world, are of increasing concern in terms of forest health. Three Tomicus spp. (T.brevipilosus, T.minor and T.yunnanensis) infect branches and trunks of Pinusyunnanensis and P.kesiya in Yunnan Province, in south-western China. Tomicus spp. are well known as vectors of ophiostomatoid fungi and their co-occurrence could result in serious ecological and economic impact on local forest ecosystems. Nonetheless, knowledge about their diversity, ecology, including pathogenicity and potential economic importance is still quite rudimentary. Therefore, an extensive survey of ophiostomatoid fungi associated with these Tomicus species infesting P.yunnanensis and P.kesiya was carried out in Yunnan. Seven hundred and seventy-two strains of ophiostomatoid fungi were isolated from the adult beetles and their galleries. The strains were identified based on comparisons of multiple DNA sequences, including the nuclear ribosomal large subunit (LSU) region, the internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2, together with the intervening 5.8S gene (ITS) and the partial genes of β-tubulin (TUB2), elongation factor 1α (TEF1-α) and calmodulin (CAL). Phylogenetic analyses were performed using maximum parsimony (MP) as well as maximum likelihood (ML). Combinations of culture features, morphological characters and temperature-dependent growth rates were also employed for species identification. Eleven species belonging to five genera were identified. These included six known species, Esteyavermicola, Leptographiumyunnanense, Ophiostomabrevipilosi, O.canum, O.minus and O.tingens and four novel taxa, described as Graphilbumanningense, O.aggregatum, Sporothrixpseudoabietina and S.macroconidia. A residual strain was left unidentified as Ophiostoma sp. 1. The overall ophiostomatoid community was by far dominated by three species, representing 87.3% of the total isolates; in decreasing order, these were O.canum, O.brevipilosi and O.minus. Furthermore, the ophiostomatoid community of each beetle, although harbouring a diversity of ophiostomatoid species, was differentially dominated by a single fungal species; Ophiostomacanum was preferentially associated with and dominated the ophiostomatoid community of T.minor, whereas O.brevipilosi and O.minus were exclusively associated with and dominated the ophiostomatoid communities of T.brevipilosus and T.yunnanensis, respectively. Eight additional species, representing the remaining 12.7% of the total isolates, were marginal or sporadic. These results suggested that sympatric Tomicus populations are dominated by distinct species showing some level of specificity or even exclusivity.
Wang HM, Wang Z, Liu F, Wu CX, Zhang SF, Kong XB, Decock C, Lu Q, Zhang Z (2019) Differential patterns of ophiostomatoid fungal communities associated with three sympatric Tomicus species infesting pines in south-western China, with a description of four new species MycoKeys 50: 93–133. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.50.32653
Introduction
Associations between insects and microorganisms are increasingly recognised as one of the major issues in forest ecology and forest health around the world (Wingfield et al. 2016). Many bark beetles are well known as tree pests causing various levels of tree mortality and forest decline in large areas of the world, mostly in temperate areas (Jankowiak 2006, Wingfield et al. 2017). These bark beetles are well known vectors of variably pathogenic fungi, forming symbiosis-like relationships (Six 2003, Lu et al. 2009).
The pine shoot beetles, Tomicus Latreille (syn. Blastophagus Eichhoff, Myelophilus Eichhoff, Scolytidae, Coleoptera), are destructive insects with a range spanning the Eurasian pine forests, seriously affecting tree growth and causing a great threat to the forest ecosystems (Kirkendall et al. 2008, Lieutier et al. 2015). Currently, eight species are recorded worldwide, i.e. T.armandii Li and Zhang (Li et al. 2010), T.brevipilosus Eggers, T.destruens Wollaston, T.minor Hartig, T.pilifer Spessivtsev, T.piniperda L., T.puellus Reitter, and T.yunnanensis Kirkendall and Faccoli (Kirkendall et al. 2008). They all occur in China except T.destruens and five of them, viz. T.armandii, T.brevipilosus, T.minor, T.pilifer and T.yunnanensis, are sympatric in forests of the Yunnan Province (Li et al. 1997, 2010, Kirkendall et al. 2008; Ye 2011). Tomicusbrevipilosus, T.minor and T.yunnanensis have overlapping geographical distribution, host range and infection periods. They aggregately infect branches and trunks of two indigenous pines, Pinusyunnanensis and P.kesiya (Li et al. 1997, 2006, Chen et al. 2009, 2010, Lu et al. 2012, 2014), causing locally extensive tree decline or mortality (Ye and Dang 1986, Ye 1991, 2011). Since the 1980s, damage caused by these bark beetles has resulted in losses of more than 93,000 m3 of pinewood (Ji et al. 2007).
Generally, two or three pine shoot beetles co-occur underneath the bark or in shoots of a single host tree, either simultaneously but with spatially isolated galleries or successively, during differential infesting peaks. Spatial and chorological differentiation would reduce competition between beetles, but their co-occurrence also could enhance cooperation (Lu et al. 2012, Chen et al. 2015). Tomicusyunnanensis is considered to be the most aggressive species in Yunnan, causing primary infestations of healthy P.yunnanensis trees and eventually tree death (Ye and Lieutier 1997, Kirkendall et al. 2008, Chen et al. 2010, 2015, Lu et al. 2014). Although T.brevipilosus is able to infect healthy trees, it preferably colonises trunks already infested by T.yunnanensis or both T.yunnanensis and T.minor (Chen et al. 2010, 2015). Tomicusminor is often regarded as a secondary, opportunist species infesting trees already weakened by T.yunnanensis or/and T.brevipilosus (Ye and Ding 1999, Lieutier et al. 2003, Chen et al. 2009).
Pine shoot beetles such as T.piniperda, T.minor and T.destruens are commonly associated with ophiostomatoid fungi (Masuya et al. 1999, Kim et al. 2005, Jankowiak 2006, 2008). Fifteen ophiostomatoid fungi were reported associated with T.piniperda in Europe (Mathiesen 1950, Lieutier et al. 1989, Gibbs and Inman 1991, Solheim and Långström 1991, Jankowiak 2006, Jankowiak and Bilański 2007) and 11 were documented in eastern Asia (Japan and Korea) (Masuya et al. 1999, Kim et al. 2005). Ophiostomaminus was shown to be the dominant species associated with T.piniperda in Europe and Japan (Mathiesen 1950, Lieutier et al. 1989, Gibbs and Inman 1991, Masuya et al. 1999, Jankowiak 2006). Leptographiumwingfieldii was shown to be the strongest pathogenic one (Gibbs and Inman 1991) in Europe. Tomicusminor also infests various pines in Europe and Asia. Fifteen (Mathiesen-Käärik 1953, Masuya et al. 1999, Jankowiak 2008) and 11 (Masuya et al. 1999) ophiostomatoid species have been reported to be associated with this beetle species in Europe and Japan, respectively. Ophiostomacanum was recorded as a frequent/dominant species in association with T.minor, both in Europe and Japan (Mathiesen 1950, 1951, Rennerfelt 1950, Francke-Grosmann 1952, Masuya et al. 1999) but seems to represent a weak pathogen to P.sylvestris (Solheim et al. 2001). Additionally, six ophiostomatoid fungi were documented associated with T.destruens in Europe (Lieutier 2002, Sabbatini Peverieri et al. 2006, Ben Jamaa et al. 2007).
Despite the fact that Tomicus spp. have caused serious losses to forest ecosystems in south-western China, there are no systematic studies of their ophiostomatoid associates but only a few sporadic reports. So far, nine ophiostomatoid species have been reported as being associated with Tomicus spp. in Yunnan. Six species (Leptographiumyunnanense, Ophiostomaips, O.minus, O.quercus, S.abietina and S.nebularis) were recorded to be associated with T.yunnanensis (Ye et al. 2000, Zhou et al. 2000, 2013, Chang et al. 2017). Two species (Graphilbumfragrans and O.tingens) were recorded as being associated with T.minor (Zhou et al. 2013, Pan et al. 2017), whereas only a single species (O.brevipilosi) was recorded as being associated with T.brevipilosus (Chang et al. 2017). Amongst them, L.yunnanense was the first species newly described from the area (Zhou et al. 2000) and is likely the most virulent one (Liao and Ye 2004, Gao et al. 2017). Until now, the relative abundance with which these fungi occur, their host (pine and beetle) relationships, and their pathogenicity remain unknown.
The symbiosis between bark beetles and ophiostomatoid fungi enhances their pathogenicity. The fitness of bark beetle populations may depend in part on the degree of the fungal partners’ pathogenicity and the resulting weakening of the tree (Christiansen et al. 1987, Kirisits 2004, Linnakoski et al. 2012), although this has been questioned by some (Six and Wingfield 2011). Therefore, the question remains whether there is any link between the differential aggression of the pine shoot beetles and the differential virulence of their fungal associates, especially in circumstances where various beetle species co-exist.
The aim of this study was to describe the diversity of ophiostomatoid fungal communities associated with three pine shoot beetles and their galleries infesting P.yunnanensis and P.kesiya in forest ecosystems of Yunnan Province. We also analysed the degree of beetle/ophiostomatoid fungi specificity. Such studies will enable us to understand the aggressive nature of the beetles and the pathogenicity of the associated fungi and the interactions, ultimately helping to address the current situation of ceaseless outbreaks and rapid expansion of the pests.
Materials and methodsSample collection and fungus isolation
Samples of galleries in bark and shoots and adults of Tomicus spp. were collected from P.yunnanensis and P.kesiya at five sites in Yunnan Province (Fig. 1, Table 1) from December 2016 to March 2017. Beetles were placed individually in sterilised Eppendorf tubes and their galleries were placed in sterile envelopes and stored at 4°C until processed within one week.
A Map showing the 11 species of ophiostomatoid fungi detected from Yunnan Province, China B, D disease symptoms on Pinusyunnanensis and P.kesiya trees infested by Tomicus spp. (T.yunnanensis, T.minor and T.brevipilosus) and ophiostomatoid fungi C, G, H exposed branches of Tomicus spp. on P.yunnanensis and P.kesiya E, F, I–K galleries of Tomicus spp. on P.yunnanensis and P.kesiya.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/292787
Basic information on the sample collection plots in China.
Location
Host
Insect vector
longitude\latitude
altitude(m)
No. of examained samples
Xiangyun,Yunnan
Pinusyunnanensis
Tomicusyunnanensis, T.minor
25°21'25.8"N, 100°51'49"E
2255.4
447
Puer,Yunnan
P.kesiya
T.brevipilosus, T.minor
22°56'36.1"N, 101°14'36.7"E
1400.7
346
Qujing,Yunnan
P.yunnanensis
T.yunnanensis, T.minor, T.brevipilosus
25°28'51"N, 103°46'32"E
2068.2
102
Anning,Yunnan
P.yunnanensis
T.yunnanensis, T.minor, T.brevipilosus
24°53'32"N, 102°24'23"E
1939.9
138
Yuxi, Yunan
P.yunnanensis
T.yunnanensis, T.minor
24°18'23"N, 102°34'37"E
1908.1
85
Isolations from beetles and their galleries were carried out on 2% malt extract agar (MEA: 20 g Biolab malt extract, 20 g Biolab agar and 1 000 ml deionised water) with 0.05% NaClO added, in 9-cm Petri dishes as described by Seifert et al. (1993). Hyphal tips of emerging colonies were cut and transferred to MEA plates in order to obtain pure strains. The strains were grown routinely on 2% MEA at 25 °C. Representative cultures of each morphotype were deposited in the China Forestry Culture Collection Center (CFCC, part of the National Infrastructure of Microbial Resources) and the culture collection of the Chinese Academy of Forestry (CXY) (Table 2).
Representative strains of the ophiostomatoid fungi associated with three Tomicus spp. in Yunnan Province, China, and three E.vermicola strains used in this study.
Group
Taxon
Strain no.
Host
Location
Beetle
GenBank no.
LSU
ITS\ ITS2–LSU5
BT
EF
CAL
A
Esteyavermicola
CFCC52625 (CXY1893)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.yunnanensis
MH325143
–
MH697597
MH605999
–
ATCC74485
Japanese black pine
Taiwan, China
Bursaphelenchusxylophilus
–
–
–
GQ995674
–
CNU120806
soil
Korea
saprophytic nematodes
EU627684
–
FJ490553
GQ995671
–
CBS 115803
oak
Czech Republic
Scolytusintricatus
–
–
FJ490552
GQ995672
–
B
Graphilbumanningense
CFCC52631 (CXY1939)
P.yunnanensis
Anning
T.yunnanensis
MH325162
MH555903
MH683595
–
–
CFCC52632 (CXY1940)
P.yunnanensis
Anning
T.yunnanensis
MH325164
MH555901
MH683596
–
–
CFCC52633 (CXY1944)
P.yunnanensis
Anning
T.minor
MH325163
MH555902
MH683597
–
–
C
Leptographiumyunnanense
CFCC52619 (CXY1897)
P.kesiya
Ninger
T.brevipilosus
MH325138
MH487721
MH603933
MH606000
–
CFCC52620 (CXY1900)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.yunnanensis
MH325139
MH487724
MH603934
MH606001
–
CFCC52621 (CXY1904)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.yunnanensis
MH325140
MH487726
MH603935
MH606003
–
CFCC52622 (CXY1908)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.yunnanensis
MH325142
MH487725
MH603938
MH606002
–
CFCC52623 (CXY1917)
P.kesiya
Puer
T.brevipilosus
MH325137
MH487723
MH603936
MH606004
–
CFCC52624 (CXY1925)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.yunnanensis
MH325141
MH487722
MH603937
MH606005
–
D
Ophiostomabrevipilosi
CFCC52596 (CXY1828)
Pinuskesiya
Puer
T.brevipilosus
MH325134
MH555904
MH619527
–
–
(CXY1806) CFCC52597
P.kesiya
Puer
T.brevipilosus
MH325135
MH555905
MH619528
–
–
CFCC52598 (CXY1808)
P.kesiya
Puer
T.brevipilosus
MH325136
MH555906
MH619529
–
–
E
O.canum
CFCC52601 (CXY1858)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.minor
MH325151
MH555889
MH619521
–
–
CFCC52602 (CXY1848)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.minor
MH325152
MH555890
MH619522
–
–
CFCC52603 (CXY1857)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.minor
MH325153
MH555891
MH619523
–
–
F
O.aggregatum
CFCC52615 (CXY1876)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.yunnanensis
MH325146
MH555894
MH603927
–
–
CFCC52616 (CXY1875)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.yunnanensis
MH325145
MH555893
MH603929
–
–
CFCC52617 (CXY1874)
P.kesiya
Puer
T.minor
MH325147
MH555895
MH603928
–
–
G
O.minus
CFCC52606 (CXY1885)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.yunnanensis
MH325154
MH578163
MH619524
–
–
CFCC52607 (CXY1877)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.yunnanensis
MH325155
MH578164
MH619525
–
–
CFCC52608 (CXY1881)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.yunnanensis
MH325156
MH578165
MH619526
–
–
H
O.tingens
CFCC52611 (CXY1866)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.minor
MH325148
MH578166
MH603931
–
–
CFCC52612 (CXY1865)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.minor
MH325149
MH578167
MH603932
–
–
CFCC52613 (CXY1868)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.yunnanensis
MH325150
MH578168
MH603930
–
–
I
Ophiostoma sp. 1
CFCC52618 (CXY1936)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.yunnanensis
MH325144
MH555892
MH683600
–
–
J
Sporothrixmacroconidia
CFCC52628 (CXY1894)
P.yunnanensis
Xiangyun
T.yunnanensis
MH325157
MH555898
MH697594
–
MH592598
CFCC52629 (CXY1895)
P.kesiya
Ninger
T.brevipilosus
MH325158
MH555899
MH697595
–
MH592599
CFCC52630 (CXY1896)
P.kesiya
Ninger
T.brevipilosus
MH325159
MH555900
MH697596
–
MH592600
K
S.pseudoabietina
CFCC52626 (CXY1937)
P.yunnanensis
Qujing
T.minor
MH325160
MH555896
MH683598
–
MH592601
CFCC52627 (CXY1938)
P.yunnanensis
Qujing
T.minor
MH325161
MH555897
MH683599
–
MH592602
Species names in bold are species newly described in this study. CFCC: China Forestry Culture Collection Center, Beijing, China; CXY (Culture Xingyao): Culture collection of the Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry. Sequences missing data are indicated by [–]
Morphology and growth studies
Morphological characterisation of both the sexual and asexual reproduction forms was performed on 2% MEA media incubated 3–6 weeks at 25 °C in the dark. Slide cultures were made to observe all microscopic characters (sexual/asexual structures) using a BX51 OLYMPUS microscope with differential interference contrast. Fifty measurements were made of each relevant structure and the ranges were calculated. Standard deviation (SD), minimum (min) and maximum (max) measurements are presented as (min–) (mean–SD) – (mean+SD) (–max).
The optimal growth temperature of the various strains was determined by placing a 5-mm (diam.) plug from an actively growing fungal colony upside down at the centre of an MEA plate. For each strain, three replicates were incubated at temperatures ranging from 5 to 35 °C at five-degree intervals, for 8d. The diameter of each colony was measured daily. Culture characters were recorded on MEA incubated at 25 °C for 8 d and 20 d. Colour descriptions were made by reference to Rayner (1970).
DNA extraction and sequencing
DNA was extracted from actively growing mycelium scraped from seven-day-old cultures using sterile scalpels and transferred to 2 ml Eppendorf tubes. DNA extraction and purification were performed using the Invisorb Spin Plant Mini Kit (Invitek, Berlin, Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocols.
DNA sequences were determined for six gene regions: the nuclear ribosomal large subunit region (LSU), the internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2, including the intervening 5.8S gene (ITS), as well as segments of the β-tubulin (TUB2), elongation factor 1α (TEF1-α) and calmodulin (CAL) genes. DNA fragments were amplified using the primer pairs LROR/LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990), ITS1/ITS4 (White et al. 1990), ITS3/LR3 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990, White et al. 1990), Bt2a/Bt2b (Glass and Donaldson 1995), EF1/EF2 (Jacobs et al. 2004) and CL1/CL2a (Zhang et al. 2015), respectively. PCR reactions were conducted in 25 μl volumes (2.5 mM MgCl2, 1× PCR buffer, 0.2 mM dNTP, 0.2 mM of each primer and 2.5 U Taq-polymerase enzyme). PCR amplifications were carried out in a thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). The reaction conditions for these six gene regions were similar to those described in the references used for primer design. PCR products were cleaned with an MSB Spin PCR apace Kit (250), following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Phylogenetic analyses
BLAST searches for the obtained sequences were performed in NCBI GenBank and published sequences of closely related species were downloaded. Alignments of the genes were made using MAFFT 7.0 (Katoh and Standley 2013) and the E-INS-i strategy and edited manually in MEGA 5.2 (Tamura et al. 2011). Phylogenetic analyses were performed using maximum parsimony (MP) as well as maximum likelihood (ML).
ML analyses were implemented using RAxML v. 7.0.3 (Stamatakis 2006), under the GTR-GAMMA model. Support for the nodes was estimated from 1 000 bootstrap replicates. The results were subsequently exported to Figtree v.1.4.2 to visualise the trees.
MP analyses were implemented in PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford 2003). The most parsimonious trees were identified by a heuristic search of 1 000 random addition sequence replicates, using the tree-bisection-recognition (TBR) algorithm for branch swapping. Branch support was assessed by 1 000 bootstrap replicates. Tree length (TL), consistency index (CI), retention index (RI), rescaled consistency index (RC) and homoplasy index (HI) were used to evaluate the trees.
ResultsFungal isolation and sequence comparisons
Three Tomicus species occurred on P.yunnanensis and P.kesiya in the areas studied, either independently or concomitantly in individuals of the host trees (Fig. 1). In total, 772 strains of ophiostomatoid fungi (Hyalorhinocladiella-like, Ophiostoma, Pesotum-like, Leptographium-like and Sporothrix-like) were isolated from 223 adult beetles (20% of the strains) and 890 galleries (80% of the strains). Galleries or adults of T.yunnanensis yielded 297 strains whereas 247 strains were retrieved from galleries or adults of T.minor and 228 strains from galleries or adults of T.brevipilosus (Table 3).
The LSU sequence was used to search for preliminary affinities using the BLASTn search option in GenBank. As a result, these strains were found to be distributed over 5 genera and 11 tentative species/groups (A–K) (Table 2).
Phylogenetic analyses
The degrees of polymorphism of LSU, ITS, TUB2, TEF1-α and CAL make them variably suitable for genus or species discrimination amongst ophiostomatoid fungi. The LSU sequence is a suitable marker to infer the generic affinities (de Beer and Wingfield 2013, de Beer et al. 2013a, 2016); it allowed confirming the preliminary placement of our strains based on morphological characters (Fig. 2). The ITS region would be useful to place strains within the Ophiostomas. l. complex, but the degree of polymorphism does not allow distinguishing species. Usually, TUB2, TEF1-α and CAL regions are better markers to identify and, where appropriate, to show the genetic diversity within ophiostomatoid fungi (Zipfel et al. 2006, de Beer and Wingfield 2013, de Beer et al. 2016).
Phylograms obtained from ML analysis of LSU sequences, showing fungal associates with pines infected by Tomicusyunnanensis, T.minor and T.brevipilosus in Yunnan Province, China. Novel sequences obtained in this study are printed in bold type. Bootstrap values ≥ 70% for ML and MP are indicated above branches. Bootstrap values < 70% are indicated by the symbol *. Strains representing ex-type sequences are marked with ‘T’; ML, maximum likelihood; MP, maximum parsimony and the final alignment of 743 positions, including gaps.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/292788
On the basis of the LSU blast searches, one to six strains of each tentative species (A–K) were selected for sequencing of five additional DNA markers (ITS, ITS2-LSU, TUB2, TEF1-α and CAL) to infer more accurate identification and phylogenetic affinities. Six sequence datasets (LSU, ITS, ITS2-LSU, TUB2, TEF1-α and CAL) were generated for a total of 31 representative strains (Table 2) and the sequences were deposited in GenBank. Resulting alignments were deposited in TreeBASE (submission no: 24032). The topologies generated by the ML and MP analyses were highly concordant and the ML phylograms are presented for all the individual genes, incorporating nodal supports of both the ML and MP analyses.
The LSU dataset consisted of 109 sequences, 11 sequences obtained in this study and 98 downloaded from GenBank. The phylogenetic analyses confirmed the morphology-based placement of our strains into Esteya, Graphilbum, Leptographium, Ophiostoma and Sporothrix (Fig. 2).
Group A consisted of a single strain. LSU-based phylogenetic analysis showed this strain to be close to E.vermicola (Fig. 2). TUB2 and TEF1-α data analysis confirmed the strain’s close affinities to E.vermicola (Fig. 3a, b), that could justify conspecificity.
Phylograms obtained from ML analysis of β-tubulin A and elongation factor B sequences of Esteya, showing fungal associates with pines infected by Tomicusyunnanensis in Yunnan Province, China. Novel sequences obtained in this study are printed in bold type. Bootstrap values ≥ 70% for ML and MP are indicated above branches. Bootstrap values < 70% are indicated by the symbol *. Strains representing ex-type sequences are marked with ‘T’; ML, maximum likelihood; MP, maximum parsimony and the final alignment of 320 (A), 856 (B) positions, including gaps.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/292789
Group B strains nested within the Graphilbum lineage in the LSU-based phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2). Phylogenetic analysis based on LSU, ITS and TUB2 concordantly showed that the group B strains formed a single, well-supported clade related to but distinct from Gra.rectangulosporium and Gra.microcarpum (Fig. 4a, b); this would warrant its recognition as a distinct, undescribed species.
Phylograms obtained from ML analysis of ITS sequences A and β-tubulin sequences B of Graphilbum showing fungal associates with pines infected by Tomicusyunnanensis and T.minor in Yunnan Province, China. Novel sequences obtained in this study are printed in bold type. Bootstrap values ≥ 70% for ML and MP are indicated above branches. Bootstrap values < 70% are indicated by the symbol *. Strains representing ex-type sequences are marked with ‘T’; ML, maximum likelihood; MP, maximum parsimony and the final alignment of 515 (A), 481 (B) positions, including gaps.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/292790
Group C strains were shown to belong to the Leptographium lineage in the LSU-based phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2). The ITS2-LSU dataset consisted of six of our own sequences and 49 reference sequences downloaded from GenBank. Within the Leptographium lineage, group C strains nested in the L.lundbergii-complex; they were related to L.yunnanense, L.lundbergii and L.conjunctum (Fig. 5a). TUB2- and TEF1-α based analysis confirmed their close affinities with L.yunnanense, although forming a slightly divergent clade (Fig. 5b, c). TUB2 and TEF1-α sequences of group C strains showed some polymorphisms, which could be considered as falling within the natural diversity of L.yunnanense.
Phylograms obtained from ML analysis of ITS2-28S A β-tubulin B and elongation factor C sequences of Leptographium, showing fungal associates with pines infected by Tomicusyunnanensis and T.brevipilosus in Yunnan Province, China. Novel sequences obtained in this study are printed in bold type. Bootstrap values ≥ 70% for ML and MP are indicated above branches. Bootstrap values < 70% are indicated by the symbol *. Strains representing ex-type sequences are marked with ‘T’; ML, maximum likelihood; MP, maximum parsimony and the final alignment of 641 (A), 358 (B), 639 (C) positions, including gaps.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/292791
The six strains from groups D to I nested within the Ophiostoma lineage based on the LSU phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2). The ITS dataset comprised species from all lineages discovered in this study. Analysis of this dataset yielded the phylograms shown in Fig. 6. Sixteen ITS sequences generated in this study were compared with 61 sequences retrieved from GenBank, representing the major groups of Ophiostoma (de Beer and Wingfield 2013, Linnakoski et al. 2016).
Phylograms obtained from ML analysis of ITS sequences of Ophiostoma, showing fungal associates with pines infected by Tomicusyunnanensis, T.minor and T.brevipilosus in Yunnan Province, China. Novel sequences obtained in this study are printed in bold type. Bootstrap values ≥ 70% for ML and MP are indicated above branches. Bootstrap values < 70% are indicated by the symbol *. Strains representing ex-type sequences are marked with ‘T’; ML, maximum likelihood; MP, maximum parsimony and the final alignment of 633 positions, including gaps.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/292792
The ITS- and TUB2-based phylogenetic inferences (Figs 6, 7a, b) showed that the strains of groups D and E nested within the O.clavatum- and O.piceae-complex (de Beer and Wingfield 2013, Yin et al. 2016, Linnakoski et al. 2016), in which they were positioned in the near vicinity of the O.brevipilosi and O.canum clades, respectively. From these results, and considering their morphological features, we concluded that the strains of groups D and E are conspecific with O.brevipilosi and O.canum, respectively.
Phylograms obtained from ML analysis of β-tubulin sequences of OphiostomaA, B, D, E and ITS sequences of O.minus-complex C showing fungal associates with pines infected by Tomicusyunnanensis, T.minor and T.brevipilosus in Yunnan Province, China. Novel sequences obtained in this study are printed in bold type. Bootstrap values ≥ 70% for ML and MP are indicated above branches. Bootstrap values < 70% are indicated by the symbol *. Strains representing ex-type sequences are marked with ‘T’; ML, maximum likelihood; MP, maximum parsimony and the final alignment of 455 (A), 430 (B), 541 (C), 378 (D), 423 (E) positions, including gaps.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/292793
In the ITS-based phylogenetic analysis, strains of groups G and I were grouped with the O.minus complex (Fig. 6). ITS- and TUB2-based phylogenetic analyses consistently showed that group G strains formed a well-supported subclade between the North American and European subclades within the O.minus lineage (Fig. 7c, d). The strains of group G are therefore identified as O.minus. The ITS- and TUB2-based phylogenetic analyses consistently showed that the single strain of group I formed a branch that is related to, but distinct from the O.minus, O.kryptum and O.olgensis clades (Figs 6, 7d). Hence, this strain is interpreted as belonging to a distinct, undescribed Ophiostoma.
The remaining two groups (F and H) were not placed in any defined complex. Phylogenetic analyses, based on ITS and TUB2 sequences, consistently showed that the group H strains clustered in the near vicinity of the O.tingens clade whereas group F strains formed a clade related to, but distinct from the O.macrosporum and O.tingens clades (Figs 6, 7e). Thus, the strains in group H should be identified as O.tingens whereas the strains of group F represent an undescribed Ophiostoma.
Strains of groups J and K nested within the Sporothrix lineage in LSU-based phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2). The phylograms resulting from the analyses of individuals are shown in Fig. 8 (ITS), Fig. 9a, c (TUB2) and Fig. 9b, d (CAL).
Phylograms obtained from ML analysis of ITS sequences of Sporothrix, showing fungal associates with pines infected by Tomicusyunnanensis, T.minor and T.brevipilosus in Yunnan Province, China. Novel sequences obtained in this study are printed in bold type. Bootstrap values ≥ 70% for ML and MP are indicated above branches. Bootstrap values < 70% are indicated by the symbol *. Strains representing ex-type sequences are marked with ‘T’; ML, maximum likelihood; MP, maximum parsimony and the final alignment of 546 positions, including gaps.
Phylograms obtained from ML analysis of β-tubulin A, C and calmodulin B, D sequences of Sporothrix, showing fungal associates with pines infected by Tomicusyunnanensis, T.minor and T.brevipilosus in Yunnan Province, China. Novel sequences obtained in this study are printed in bold type. Bootstrap values ≥ 70% for ML and MP are indicated above branches. Bootstrap values < 70% are indicated by the symbol *. Strains representing ex-type sequences are marked with ‘T’; ML, maximum likelihood; MP, maximum parsimony and the final alignment of 284(A), 622(B), 260(C), 675(D) positions, including gaps.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/292795
The ITS-based analyses showed that group K strains belonged to the S.gossypina-complex whereas the group J strains were not placed in any species complex as defined by de Beer et al. (2016) (Fig. 8). Both groups formed independent, well-supported clades in ITS-, TUB2- and CAL-based phylogenetic analyses (Figs 8, 9). It could be deduced from results of multiple phylogenies that both groups represent novel species.
Morphology and taxonomy
From a morphological perspective, strains of groups D, E and G appeared, overall, concordant with the descriptions or our own observations of reference strains, namely of O.brevipilosi, O.canum and O.minus, respectively. However, although strains of groups A, C, and H are phylogenetically close to E.vermicola, L.yunnanense and O.tingens, respectively, justifying, for the time being, conspecificity, their phenotype deviated slightly from published descriptions and/or our own observation of type material. The description of these species is extended. Strains of groups B, F, J and K revealed unique combinations of phenotypes, allowing morphological distinction from their closest phylogenetic relatives; consequently, they are described below as new species. The strain of the stand-alone group I also may represent an undescribed species; however, we refrain from describing it for the time being, waiting for more material to become available.
Asexual form: Hyalorhinocladiella-like. Conidiophores mononematous, micronematous; conidiophorous cells solitary, integrated, flask-shaped, with an inflated base (3.6–) 4.6–6.1 (–7.1) μm in diam., the fertile hyphoid part (9.1–) 12.2–19.0 (–22.5) × (1.4–) 1.9–3.1 (–4.7) μm, often crooked due to successive conidial development; conidia 1-celled, asymmetrically ellipsoidal in face view, concave, lunate in side view, with a layer of adhesive mucus on the concave surface, ending slightly apiculate, hyaline, smooth, (8.0–) 10–12 (–13.1) × (3.3–) 3.4–4.5 (–5.1) μm, containing an ovoid endospore-like structure.
A–H Morphological characters of EsteyavermicolaA, B upper and reverse of cultures on 2% MEA 20 d after inoculation C–H conidiogenous cells with lunate conidia I–M the cuticle of a nematode attached by many lunate conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (I, K, L); 10 μm (C–H, J, M).
Colonies on 2% MEA in the dark reaching 31 mm in diam. in 8 days at 25 °C, growth rate up to 5 mm/day at the fastest; colony margin smooth. Mycelium compact, somewhat floccose in the margin, white at first, gradually discolouring to greyish-green, eventually dark green. Optimal growth temperature 25 °C, growth at 5 °C and 35 °C.
Known substrate and host.
Galleries of Tomicusyunnanensis in Pinusyunnanensis.
Esteyavermicola is known only from an asexual, Hyalorhinocladiella-like state producing lunate and bacilliform conidia (Liou et al. 1999, Kubátová et al. 2000, Wang et al. 2009, 2014) that we also observed in various strains of E.vermicola with a different origin (Taiwan, Korea, Czech Republic). Our strain was identified as E.vermicola based on phylogenetic inferences and morphological characters. However, our strain differed from previous descriptions (Liou et al. 1999) in having only lunate conidia in vitro. The size of the lunate conidia of our strains (mostly 10 - 12 × 3.4 - 4.5 μm) was similar to that reported for E.vermicola, viz. 9.9–11.9 × 3.4–4.5 μm vs 8.2-11.1 × 3.5–3.7 μm (Taiwan, Liou et al. 1999), 9.3–12.4 × 3.0–3.2 μm (Czech Republic, Kubátová et al. 2000), 7.7–12.1 × 3.0–3.8 μm (Korea, Wang et al. 2009) or 8.7–11.9 × 3.0–3.6 μm (Brazil, Wang et al. 2014).
This is the first report of E.vermicola from continental China. The species was originally isolated from Japanese black pine infected by the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchusxylophilus, in Taiwan (Liou et al. 1999). Since then, its distribution range has been extended to Japan and Korea, Europe (Czech Republic, Italy) and both North (USA) and South America (Brazil) (Liou et al. 1999, Kubátová et al. 2000, Wang et al. 2009, 2014, Li et al. 2018). This species is associated with various vectors, including the pinewood nematode, Oxoplatypusquadridentatus and the bark beetle Scolytusintricatus. It was isolated also from wooden packaging material infested by Bursaphelenchusrainulfi.
FungiOphiostomatalesOphiostomataceae8E7926B2-6F81-57E8-A282-6D271F05B246GraphilbumanningenseMB828884H. Wang, Q. Lu & Z. Zhangsp. n.Fig. 11Etymology.
‘anningense’ (Latin), referring to the type locality.
Asexual forms: Pesotum-like and Hyalorhinocladiella-like. Pesotum-like conidiophores abundant on 2% MEA, macronematous, synnematous, (150–) 210–293 (–336) μm long including conidiogenous apparatus, the base dark brown, slightly widened, (6.7–) 7.9–18.8 (–29.0) μm wide anchored in the media by brown rhizoid-like hyphae, the apex slightly enlarging, fan-shaped; conidiogenous cells hyaline, thin-walled, aseptate, (15.3–) 21.0–35.5 (–42) × (0.7–) 1.1–1.9 (–2.3) μm; conidia 1-celled, clavate, ellipsoid to ovoid with truncate base and rounded apex, hyaline, smooth, (3.1–) 3.6–6.3 (–9.7) × (1.4–) 1.6–2.2 (–2.5) μm.
Morphological characters of Graphilbumanningense sp. n. A, B Upper and reverse of cultures on 2% MEA 8 d after inoculation C, D, G conidiogenous cells of Pesotum-like macronematal asexual state and conidia E, F, H conidiogenous cells of Hyalorhinocladiella-like asexual state and conidia. Scale bars: 50 μm (C); 20 μm (D); 10 μm (E–H).
Colonies on 2% MEA in the dark reaching 90 mm in diam. in 6 days at 25 °C, growth rate up to 19.5 mm/day at the fastest; colony margin smooth. Mycelium superficial to flocculose or floccose, hyaline; reverse hyaline to pale yellowish. Optimal growth temperature 30 °C, slow growth at 40 °C, no growth at 5 °C.
Known substrate and hosts.
Galleries of Tomicusyunnanensis and T.minor in Pinusyunnanensis.
Graphilbumanningense is characterised by a Pesotum-like and a Hyalorhinocladiella-like asexual state. It is phylogenetically closely related to Gra.rectangulosporium. However, Gra.rectangulosporium produced a sexual state in vitro (Ohtaka et al. 2006) which has not been observed in Gra.anningense. Other morphologically similar species include Gra.fragrans, Gra.crescericum, Gra.kesiyae and Gra.puerense. Graphilbumkesiyae and Gra.puerense also produce a Pesotum-like and a Hyalorhinocladiella-like asexual state. Graphilbumanningense and Gra.kesiyae differ by the size of their synnemata, whose length ranges do not overlap, viz. 210–293 μm and 112.5–173 μm long (Harrington et al. 2001), respectively. They also differ by their optimal growth temperature, respectively 30°C and 25°C. The synnemata of Gra.puerense, 206–357 μm long (Chang et al. 2017), are marginally longer than those of Gra.anningense. Graphilbumfragrans and Gra.crescericum produce only a Leptographium-like and/or a Hyalorhinocladiella-like asexual state in vitro (Harrington et al. 2001, Chang et al. 2017).
Graphilbumanningense was isolated from galleries of T.yunnanensis and T.minor infesting P.yunnanensis. Previously, Gra.fragrans had been reported from T.yunnanensis infesting P.yunnanensis and from Pissodes spp. infesting Tsugadumosa and P.armandii in China (Paciura et al. 2010, Zhou et al. 2013). Graphilbumkesiyae and Gra.puerense were isolated from galleries of Polygraphusaterrimus, Po.szemaoensis and Ipsacuminatus infesting P.kesiya (Chang et al. 2017). Although the geographic distribution of these four Graphilbum species overlaps, their hosts and vectors are nevertheless, as far as it is known, different (Chang et al. 2017).
FungiOphiostomatalesOphiostomataceae66F148CA-F2C1-590D-9DB1-6793D4A2353BLeptographiumyunnanenseMB 466542X.D. Zhou, K. Jacobs, M.J. Wingf. & M. Morelet, Mycoscience 41(6): 576. 2000.Fig. 12Description.
Sexual form: unknown.
Asexual form: Leptographium-like. Conidiophores occurring singly or in groups of up to three, arising from the superficial mycelium, erect, macronematous, mononematous, (93.5–) 159–412 (–544) μm long, without rhizoid-like structures; stipes simple, cylindrical, not constricted at septa, 1-6-septate, pale olivaceous at the base, (12–) 19.0–128 (–245) × (3.3–) 4.1–6.1 (–7.3) μm; conidiogenous apparatus (33.0–) 65.5–119.5 (–168.0) μm long (high), with 2 to 3 series of cylindrical branches; primary branches hyaline to pale olivaceous, smooth, cylindrical, 2–3 septate, (11.5–) 18.2–37.7 (–56.0) μm long and (3.0–) 3.7–5.9 (–7.7) μm wide; secondary branches hyaline, 0–2 septate, (10.3–) 14.5–30.0 (–50.1) μm long, (2.8–) 3.4–5.5 (–7.3) μm wide; conidiogenous cells discrete, 2–3 per branch, cylindrical, (10.2–) 13.2–29.6 (–57.4) × (2.2–) 2.9–3.9 (–4.4) μm; conidia 1-celled, oblong to obovoid with truncate bases, hyaline, (5.8–) 7.0–10.4 (–13.0) × (2.9–) 3.6–5.3 (–6.4) μm.
Morphological characters of LeptographiumyunnanenseA, B upper and reverse of cultures on 2% MEA 8 d after inoculation D, I conidiophore on 2% MEA C, E–H conidiogenous cells of Leptographium-like asexual state and conidia. Scale bars: 50 μm (D, I); 10 μm (C, E–H).
Colonies on 2% MEA medium fast growing in the dark, reaching 76 mm in diam. in 8 days at 25 °C, growth rate up to 20 mm/day at the fastest; colony margin smooth. Hyphae submerged in agar with aerial mycelium, greenish-olivaceous to olivaceous, smooth, straight; reverse hyphae umber-brown to dark olivaceous. Optimal growth temperature 25 °C, slow growth at 5 °C and 30 °C.
Known substrate and hosts.
Tomicusyunnanensis and its galleries in Pinusyunnanensis, galleries of T.brevipilosus in P.kesiya.
Known insect vectors.
Tomicusbrevipilosus, T.yunnanensis.
Known distribution.
Yunnan Province, China.
Specimens examined.
CHINA, Yunnan, adults of Tomicusyunnanensis and their galleries in Pinusyunnanensis, Tomicusbrevipilosus galleries in P.kesiya. Apr. 2017, HM Wang, CFCC 52619 = CXY 1897, CFCC 52620 = CXY 1900, CFCC 52621 = CXY 1904, CFCC 52622 = CXY 1908, CFCC 52623 = CXY 1917, CFCC 52624 = CXY 1925.
Note.
The sole reproductive structure formed on MEA in L.yunnanense is a Leptographium-like state. Our strains were identified as L.yunnanense, based on phylogenetic evidence and secondarily, on morphological features. However, our strains slightly deviated from L.yunnanense in having longer conidiophores, mainly 159–412 μm vs mostly 74–227 (–233) μm (Zhou et al. 2000) or 80–240 μm (Yamaoka et al. 2008). Furthermore, our strains grew faster than reported for the species, 76 mm vs 44 mm in 8 days at 25 °C (Zhou et al. 2000).
Although our strains were slightly genetically and morphologically divergent, we are of the opinion that they enter into the current L.yunnanense species concept (e.g. sensuZhou et al. 2000). Yamaoka et al. (2008) showed the genetic diversity of L.yunnanense in Yunnan to be higher than in other places, that which is confirmed by the present study.
Leptographiumyunnanense was originally described from Yunnan Province with only an asexual state (Zhou et al. 2000). Subsequently, mating of strains from different origins (Thailand, China and Japan) yielded the sexual state, which is formed by neckless ascocarps and cucullate ascospores (Yamaoka et al. 2008).
Leptographiumyunnanense was the third most abundant species associated with T.yunnanensis in our study. A few strains also were isolated from T.brevipilosus infesting P.kesiya and none from T.minor.
FungiOphiostomatalesOphiostomataceae00522BD7-3CDA-52D5-BECA-A0A8BB453400OphiostomaaggregatumMB828885H. Wang, Q. Lu & Z. Zhangsp. n.Fig. 13Etymology.
‘aggregatum’ (Latin), reflects to the conidiophores aggregated in clusters.
Morphological characters of Ophiostomaaggregatum sp. n. A, B upper and reverse of cultures on 2% MEA 8 d after inoculation C conidiomata on 2% MEA (bar = 50 μm) D–H conidiogenous cells of Leptographium-like asexual state and conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (C); 10 μm (D–H).
Colonies on 2% MEA fast growing in the dark, reaching 90 mm in diam. in 8 days at 25 °C, growth rate up to 13 mm/day at the fastest; colony margin smooth. Hyphae submerged and aerial, umber-brown to dark olivaceous, flocculose or floccose; reverse hyphae umber-brown to dark olivaceous. Optimal growth temperature 25 °C, able to grow at 5 °C and 30 °C. No growth at 35 °C.
Known substrate and hosts.
Galleries of Tomicusyunnanensis and T.minor in Pinusyunnanensis.
Known insect vectors.
Tomicusminor, T.yunnanensis.
Known distribution.
Yunnan Province, China.
Additional specimens examined.
CHINA, Yunnan, from Tomicusyunnanensis and T.minor galleries in Pinusyunnanensis, Dec. 2016, Apr. 2017, HM Wang, CFCC 52616 = CXY 1875, CFCC 52617 = CXY 1874.
Note.
Ophiostomaaggregatum produced a single asexual, Leptographium-like state in vitro. This species is phylogenetically closely related to O.macrosporum, O.tingens, O.floccosum, O.tapionis and O.piliferum in LSU-, ITS- and TUB2-based phylogenetic inferences. Ophiostomaaggregatum and O.tingens are shown to be sympatric in Yunnan pine forest; both taxa were isolated from galleries and adults of T.minor and T.yunnanensis infesting P.yunnanensis (Table 2). Ophiostomatingens was also reported from T.minor infesting P.yunnanensis in Yunnan (Pan et al. 2017).
Ophiostomaaggregatum and O.tingens differ in their asexual state. Ophiostomaaggregatum only produces a Leptographium-like state. Inversely, the asexual states of O.tingens are variable. Our strains produced a Pesotum-like and a Sporothrix-like state whereas previously, Francke-Grosmann (1952) and de Beer et al. (2013b) reported a Hyalorhinocladiella- to Raffaelea-like state in European strains. The origin of this variability and its importance for taxonomy is uncertain.
Ophiostomamacrosporum, O.floccosum, O.tapionis and O.piliferum also differ from O.aggregatum by their asexual state. Ophiostomamacrosporum and O.floccosum produce a Pesotum-like asexual state, O.tapionis a Hyalorhinocladiella-like state and O.piliferum produces a Sporothrix-like state (Francke-Grosmann 1952, Upadhyay 1981, Yamaoka et al. 2004, Linnakoski et al. 2008).
Ophiostomamacrosporum and O.tingens were both originally described in Trichosporium as T.tingensvar.macrosporum and T.tingens (Lagerberg 1927, Francke-Grosmann 1952). Batra (1967) transferred these two species into Ambrosiella. It is only recently that the morphological characteristics were found to agree with those of Ophiostoma (de Beer et al. 2013b). Ophiostomamacrosporum has been reported from various Pinus spp. (including P.sylvestris) infected by Ipsacuminatus in Europe (Francke-Grosmann 1952, Batra 1967).
FungiOphiostomatalesOphiostomataceae5C3EE1DE-9841-5CC8-A9E4-68C6DAAA2F01OphiostomatingensMB801091(Lagerb. & Melin) Z.W. de Beer & M.J. Wingf., Svensk Skogsvårdsförening Tidskr. 25:233. 1927.Fig. 14Description.
Sexual form: unknown.
Asexual forms: Pesotum-like and Sporothrix-like. Pesotum-like: conidiophores macronematous, synnematous; synnemata simple, anchored into the substrate by brown rhizoid-like hyphae, (333–) 344–584 (–684) μm long including conidiogenous apparatus, the base dark brown, slightly widened, (16.7–) 17–50.5 (–65.5) μm wide, the apex cream-coloured or pale brown, slightly widening; conidia hyaline, globose to elliptical, 1-celled, smooth, (2.7–) 3.6–7.2 (–8.0) × (2.8–) 4.3–6.1 (–7.0) μm.
Morphological characters of OphiostomatingensA, B upper and reverse of cultures on 2% MEA 20 d after inoculation C–G conidiogenous cells of Sporothrix-like asexual state and conidia H–J conidiogenous cells of Pesotum-like macronematal asexual state and conidia. Scale bars: 10 μm (C–H); 50 μm (I, J).
Colonies on 2% MEA medium slow growing in the dark, reaching 39 mm in diam. in 8 days at 25 °C, growth rate up to 5 mm/day at the fastest; colony margin anomalous. Hyphae appressed to flocculose, black; reverse hyphae also black. Optimal growth temperature 25 °C, no growth at 5 °C and 30 °C.
Known substrate and hosts.
Galleries of Tomicusyunnanensis and T.minor in Pinusyunnanensis.
Known insect vectors.
Tomicusyunnanensis, T.minor.
Known distribution.
Yunnan Province, China; Europe.
Specimens examined.
CHINA, Yunnan, from Tomicusminor and T.yunnanensis galleries in Pinusyunnanensis, Feb. 2017, Nov. 2016, HM Wang, CFCC 52611 = CXY 1866, CFCC 52612 = CXY 1865, CFCC 52613 = CXY 1868.
Note.
Our strains of O.tingens were identified based on phylogenetic affinities and morphological features. (cf. above under note for O.aggregatum.)
Ophiostomatingens has been reported from sapwood of various Pinus spp. (including P.sylvestris) infested by T.minor, T.piniperda and Ipssexdentatus in Europe (Francke-Grosmann 1952, Batra 1967, Jankowiak 2008). The species was recorded in Yunnan Province in China in 2017, associated with T.minor infesting P.yunnanensis (Pan et al. 2017).
FungiOphiostomatalesOphiostomataceaeA0010747-E022-58A5-8A24-8855D4A561F0SporothrixmacroconidiaMB828886H. Wang, Q. Lu & Z. Zhangsp. n.Fig. 15Etymology.
‘macroconidia’ (Latin), referring to the large conidia of this fungus.
Type.
CHINA, Yunnan, from Tomicusyunnanensis galleries in Pinusyunnanensis, Dec. 2016, collected by HM Wang, holotype CXY 1894, culture ex-holotype CFCC 52628 = CXY 1894.
Description.
Sexual form: unknown.
Asexual form: Sporothrix-like. Conidiophores semi-macronematous, mononematous; conidiogenous cells hyaline, simple or loosely branched, thin-walled, aseptate, bearing denticles forming a rachis (4.1–) 11.0–24.5 (–36.5) × (1.4–) 2.1–3.4 (–4.9) μm; conidia hyaline, cylindrical, ellipsoid to ovoid, 1-celled, smooth, (3.6–) 4.8–7.4 (–9.9) × (2.5–) 3.2–4.9 (–9.9) μm, solitarily or aggregating in slimy masses.
Morphological characters of Sporothrixmacroconidia sp. n. A, B Upper and reverse of cultures on 2% MEA 20 d after inoculation C–H conidiogenous cells of Sporothrix-like asexual state and conidia. Scale bars: 10 μm (C–H).
Colonies on 2% MEA medium slow growing in the dark, reaching 34 mm in diam. in 8 days at 25 °C, growth rate up to 5 mm/day at the fastest; colony margin smooth. Hyphae appressed to flocculose, white; reverse hyaline to pale yellowish. Optimal growth temperature 25 °C, little growth at 5 °C and 35 °C.
Known substrates and hosts.
Galleries of Tomicusyunnanensis and T.brevipilosus in Pinusyunnanensis and P.kesiya.
Sporothrixmacroconidia is closely related to O.valdivianum, S.bragantina, S.brunneoviolacea and S.fumea in phylogenetic analyses inferred from LSU, ITS, TUB2 and CAL DNA sequence data. It differs from these species by its conidia, which are larger than those of the other four species, mostly 4.8–7.4 × 3.2–4.9 μm and 4–6 × 2 μm in O.valdivianum (Butin and Aquilar 1984), 4–6 × 2–2.5 μm in S.bragantina (Pfenning and Oberwinkler 1993), 3–7 × 1.5–3 μm in S.brunneoviolacea (Madrid et al. 2010) and 1.5–2.0 × 0.5–1.0 μm in S.fumea (Nkuekam et al. 2012). In addition, a sexual state was observed in vitro for O.valdivianum, S.bragantina and S.fumea, which was not observed in S.macroconidia and S.brunneoviolacea.
Sporothrixmacroconidia was found associated with T.yunnanensis infesting P.yunnanensis and with T.brevipilosus infesting P.kesiya. The other four similar species have very different ecology and known geographic distributions. Sporothrixfumea was isolated from Eucalyptuscloeziana infested by Phoracantha beetles in South Africa (Nkuekam et al. 2012), whereas O.valdivianum, S.bragantina and S.brunneoviolacea were obtained from soil or Nothofagus in Europe and South America (Butin and Aquilar 1984, Pfenning and Oberwinkler 1993, Madrid et al. 2010).
FungiOphiostomatalesOphiostomataceae302BD488-BF13-5CBC-8D8F-F3FC35D5A9C6SporothrixpseudoabietinaMB828887H. Wang, Q. Lu & Z. Zhangsp. n.Fig. 16Etymology.
‘pseudoabietina’ (Latin), referring to the phylogenetic affinities to S.abietina.
Sexual form perithecial: on 2% MEA, perithecia superficial or partially immersed, with a globose base extending into a cylindrical neck, often terminated by ostiolar hyphae; bases (85–) 110–152 (–168) μm diam., black, the outer layer with dark brown hyphal ornamentation; apical neck mild to dark brown at the base, pale brown to pale yellow or hyaline toward the apex, straight or slightly curved, (172–) 560–985 (–1039) μm long, (37–) 41–62 (–78) μm wide at the base, (9.3–) 12.5–17.5 (–20) μm wide at the apex; ostiolar hyphae numerous, hyaline, divergent, (19.5–) 21.5–38.0 (–43) μm long; asci not seen; ascospores hyaline, 1-celled, orange-shaped in lateral view, ellipsoid in face view, circular in polar view, (2.9 –) 3.4–4.4 (–5.3) × (0.8–) 1.0–1.5 (–1.9) μm, without mucilaginous sheath.
Asexual form: Sporothrix-like. Conidiophores semi-macronematous to mononematous; conidiogenous cells hyaline, simple or loosely branched, smooth, bearing denticles disposed in a dense rachis (16.0–) 20.5–30.5 (–34.5) × (1.2–) 1.6–2.0 (–2.3) μm; conidia 1-celled, clavate, ellipsoid to ovoid, hyaline, (3.0–) 4.0–7.0 (–9.0) × (1.0–) 1.1–3.1 (–4.8) μm.
Morphological characters of Sporothrixpseudoabietina sp. n. A, B upper and reverse of cultures on 2% MEA 20 d after inoculation C, D ostiolar hyphae present E, F perithecium G ascospores of sexual state H–I conidiogenous cells of Sporothrix-like asexual state and conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (C, D); 50 μm (E, F); 10 μm (G–I).
Colonies on 2% MEA slow growing in the dark, reaching 23 mm in diam. in 8 days at 25 °C, growth rate up to 2.5 mm/day at the fastest; colony margin smooth. Hyphae appressed to flocculose or floccose, white; reverse hyaline to pale yellowish. Optimal growth temperature 25 °C; very slow growth at 35 °C; no growth at 5 °C.
Known substrate and hosts.
Galleries of Tomicusyunnanensis and T.minor in Pinusyunnanensis.
Sporothrixpseudoabietina is characterised by a perithecial sexual form and a Sporothrix-like asexual state. Multiple phylogenetic inferences (LSU, ITS, TUB2 and CAL) showed that S.pseudoabietina belonged to the S.gossypina complex, in which it is closely related to S.abietina. However, it can be distinguished from this species, based on both morphological and physiological features. The conidia of S.pseudoabietina (4.0–7.0 × 1.1–3.1 μm) are wider than those of S.abietina (4–7.5 × 1–2 μm) (Marmolejo and Butin 1990). Perithecia are known from S.abietina but only on natural substrates and not in vitro on artificial media, contrary to those from S.pseudoabietina. The perithecial neck in S.pseudoabietina is much longer than that of S.abietina, viz. mostly 560–985 μm and 450–650 μm, respectively. Ostiolar hyphae of S.abietina and S.pseudoabietina also differ in number, numerous vs 7–10 and size, mostly 13–19 μm and in S.pseudoabietina 21.5–38.0 μm (Fig. 11c, d). In addition, no growth of S.abietina was observed at 35 °C, but S.pseudoabietina can grow at 35 °C.
The hosts and geographic distributions of S.pseudoabietina and S.abietina are also very different. Sporothrixpseudoabietina was found associated with T.minor and T.yunnanensis infecting P.yunnanensis, whereas S.abietina was reported from Abiesvejari attacked by Pseudohylesinus sp. in Mexico (Marmolejo and Butin 1990).
Discussion
In this study, 772 strains of ophiostomatoid fungi were isolated from galleries and adults of three pine shoot beetles, T.brevipilosus, T.minor and T.yunnanensis, inhabiting P.yunnanensis and P.kesiya in forests in Yunnan Province, south-western China. Multiple phylogenetic analyses and morphological features allowed the identification of 11 species from 5 genera. Six species corresponded to known taxa (E.vermicola, L.yunnanense, O.brevipilosi, O.canum, O.minus and O.tingens), whereas four species are proposed as new, Gra.anningense, O.aggregatum, S.pseudoabietina and S.macroconidia. A single strain remained unnamed.
The global ophiostomatoid fungal communities, associated with these three Tomicus species in pine forest, were dominated by far by three species, which are, in decreasing order of isolates, O.canum, O.brevipilosi and O.minus. Furthermore, these three ophiostomatoid species are not equally associated with the three Tomicus species but show variable degrees of preference or specificity.
Overall, O.canum was the most frequently isolated species in our study (253 out of the 772 strains). It was preferably (79.4% of the O.canum strains) isolated from galleries and adults of T.minor, infesting both P.yunnanensis and P.kesiya (Table 3) and dominated the ophiostomatoid community associated with this beetle (81.4%, 201 strains of O.canum out of 247 strains in the community, Table 3).
This is the first report of this species in China. It was previously reported in eastern Asia but only in Japan (Masuya et al. 1999). Ophiostomacanum was also shown to be the dominant species associated with T.minor, both in Europe and Japan (Masuya et al. 1999, Jankowiak 2008). In addition, this species was found in association with other bark beetles in Finland and Russia, e.g. Hylastesbrunneus, Hylurgopspalliatus, Ipstypographus, Pityogeneschalcographus and Trypodendronlineatum (Linnakoski et al. 2010). The close association between O.canum and T.minor appears stable over an extensive geographical distribution and tree host range, indicating likely intimate relationships.
Ophiostomabrevipilosi represented the second most frequently isolated species in our survey (224 out of 772 strains), occurring exclusively in galleries and adults of T.brevipilosus, dominating this beetle’s ophiostomatoid community (98.2%, 224 strains of O.brevipilosi out of 228 strains in the community, Table 3). The occurrence or fitness of O.brevipilosi is therefore strongly linked to the presence of T.brevipilosus.
Ophiostomabrevipilosi was described originally from Yunnan, based on six strains, all isolated from T.brevipilosus (Chang et al. 2017). It belongs to the recently defined O.clavatum complex (Linnakoski et al. 2016). It is only known from this area of south-western China.
Ophiostomaminus was the third most frequently isolated species overall (197 strains out of 772), occurring exclusively in galleries and adults of T.yunnanensis infesting P.yunnanensis, dominating this beetle ophiostomatoid community (66.3%, 197 strains of O.minus out of 297 strains in the community, Table 3).
Ophiostomaminus, first reported as a blue-stain agent in Europe (Munch 1907), is a widely distributed species, also recorded from North America and East Asia (Japan and China) (Hedgcock 1906, Gorton and Webber 2000, Gorton et al. 2004, Lu et al. 2009, Linnakoski et al. 2010). It infests various pines and is transported by various bark beetles. This species was predominantly associated with T.piniperda in Europe (Jankowiak 2006) and Japan (Masuya et al. 1999) and with the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonusfrontalis, in the southern states of the USA (Klepzig 1998, Gorton and Webber 2000, Gorton et al. 2004).
Ophiostomaminus was deemed to have two allopatric populations, viz. a North American and a Eurasian population (Gorton et al. 2004). In ITS/TUB2 phylogenetic inferences, the North American and Eurasian populations of O.minus were resolved as two closely related clades (Gorton et al. 2004, Lu et al. 2009). ITS and TUB2-based phylogenetic inferences (Fig. 7c, d) also resolved our strains as a third distinct clade, which could thus be interpreted as a third allopatric population. The question of translating these populations into a Linnaean taxonomic rank, however, remains open.
Tomicusyunnanensis galleries and adult beetles harboured the highest diversity of ophiostomatoid fungi; ten of the 11 species identified were isolated from galleries and adults of this beetle. Three species were exclusively found with this beetle (O.minus, E.vermicola, Ophiostoma sp. 1). By comparison, galleries and adults of T.minor and of T.brevipilosus yielded less species; five species were isolated from T.minor, none of which was associated exclusively with this beetle and three species from T.brevipilosus, of which one was exclusive, O.brevipilosi. Five species are shared by both T.yunnanensis and T.minor and two species by both T.yunnanensis and T.brevipilosus, but none by T.minor and T.brevipilosus and also none by all three pine shoot beetles (Table 3, Fig. 17).
Strain numbers of various ophiostomatoid fungi obtained from three Tomicus spp. and their galleries collected in Yunnan Province.
Venn diagram showing overlaps of the ophiostomatoid fungal communities associated with three pine shoot beetles.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/292786
The ectosymbiosis between bark beetles and fungi is widespread and diverse. Some fungi are highly specific and associated with a single beetle species, forming a ‘species-specific association’ (Six and Paine 1999, Six 2012), while others can be associated with many vectors (Kostovcik et al. 2014). The species-specific associations include, for instance, Ipstypographus and Endoconidiophorapolonica, I.cembrae and End.laricicola (Harrington et al. 2002) or I.subelongatus and End.fujiensis (Marin et al. 2005, Meng et al. 2015). The present study showed that species-specific associations might occur with various sympatric beetles that share the same niche. The association of T.brevipilosus and O.brevipilosi seems to be species-specific in the pine forest of Yunnan, where both taxa are, so far, endemic. In the pine forest of Yunnan, the Chinese ‘population’ of O.minus is also specifically associated with T.yunnanensis, whereas the two other O.minus ‘populations’ are associated, at least preferably, with Dendroctonusfrontalis and T.piniperda (Gorton et al. 2004, Jankowiak 2006). The genetically distinct ‘populations’ might originate from both the allopatric distribution and vector specificity and both factors could support recognition of three distinct taxa. In the pine forest of Yunnan, the association of O.canum with T.minor is preferential but not exclusive.
Up to now, no data have been provided proving the pathogenicity of these ophiostomatoid species to both indigenous pines, except for L.yunnanense (Liao and Ye 2004, Gao et al. 2017). Pathogenicity tests have been done by artificial inoculation of the dominant species into seedlings of the two pines. The results preliminarily showed that the virulence of O.minus and O.brevipilosi was significantly stronger than that of O.canum. This is similar to the relative aggressive nature of the three Tomicus species. Thus, we suspect there might be some link between beetle aggression and fungus virulence (Christiansen et al. 1987, Kirisits 2004).
Conclusions
This study provides evidence for the diversity of ophiostomatoid fungi associated with T.yunnanensis, T.minor and T.brevipilosus in Yunnan pine forest in south-western China. Eleven species were identified, of which four were new to science. The diversity is the highest in the galleries and adults of T.yunnanensis and the poorest in the galleries and adults of T.brevipilosus.
Three species, namely O.brevipilosi, O.canum and O.minus, dominate the ophiostomatoid communities; each is associated predominantly with one species of Tomicus, namely T.brevipilosus, T.minor and T.yunnanensis, respectively. In this regard, this study has revealed differential associations between beetles living sympatrically, concomitantly or sequentially, in the same ecological niche, which indicates a certain level of specificity of the relationships between the fungi and the beetles. However, the parameters behind these (partial) species-specific relationships remain unknown.
Increased study of the biodiversity, biogeography and ecology of ophiostomatoid fungi in China, in particular of those associated with Tomicus spp., would facilitate comparison with well-known species associated with other Tomicus spp. in other neighbouring or distant geographical areas, e.g. in European countries, Japan and Korea and allow a better understanding of the occurrence and mechanisms behind the outbreak of infections, enabling the development of effective management methods to alleviate the subsequent plant losses.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No.: 31770693 and 31770682). We are very grateful to Shuangcheng Li and Hongxun Wang for their help in field survey and collection. Cony Decock gratefully acknowledges the financial support received from the Belgian State–Belgian Federal Science Policy through the BCCM programme.
ReferencesBatraLR (1967) Ambrosia fungi: a taxonomic revision, and nutritional studies of some species.59: 976–1017. https://doi.org/10.2307/3757271Ben JamaaMLLieutierFYartAetal. (2007) The virulence of phytopathogenic fungi associated with the bark beetles Tomicuspiniperda and Orthotomicuserosus in Tunisia. For. Pathol.37: 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.2007.00478.xButinHAquilarM (1984) Blue-Stain Fungi on Nothofagus from Chile-Including Two New Species of Ceratocystis Ellis and Halst.109(1): 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1984.tb04233.xChangRDuongTATaerumSJetal. (2017) Ophiostomatoid fungi associated with conifer-infesting beetles and their phoretic mites in Yunnan, China. MycoKeys 28: 19. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.28.21758ChenPLiLLiuH (2009) Interspecific competition between Tomicusyunnanensis and T.minor (Col,Scolytidae) during shoot-feeding period in Yunnan of China.38(3): 52–60.ChenPLiLLiuH (2010) Host preference and competition in bark beetles, Tomicusyunnanensis and T.minor in breeding period. Journal of West China Forestry Science 39(1) 15–20.ChenPLuJHaackRAYeH (2015) Attack pattern and reproductive ecology of Tomicusbrevipilosus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Pinusyunnanensis in south-western china. Journal of Insect Science 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iev014ChristiansenEWaringRHBerrymanAA (1987) Resistance of conifers to bark beetle attack: searching for general relationships.22: 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(87)90098-3de BeerZWDuongTAWingfieldMJ (2016) The divorce of Sporothrix and Ophiostoma: solution to a problematic relationship.83: 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2016.07.001de BeerZWWingfieldMJ (2013) Emerging lineages in the Ophiostomatales. In: KA Seifert, ZW de Beer, MJ Wingfield. The OphiostomatoidFungi: Expanding Frontiers. Utrecht, The Netherlands CBS, 21–46.de BeerZWSeifertKAWingfieldMJ (2013a) The ophiostomatoid fungi: Their dual position in the sordariomycetes. In: SeifertKAde BeerZWWingfieldMJ (Eds) The ophiostomatoid fungi: Expanding frontiers., 1–19.de BeerZWSeifertKAWingfieldMJ (2013b) A nomenclator for ophiostomatoid genera and species in the Ophiostomatales and Microascales. In: SeifertKAde BeerZWWingfieldMJ (Eds) The ophiostomatoid fungi: Expanding frontiers., 245–322.Francke-GrosmannH (1952) Uber die Ambrosiazucht der beiden Kiefernborkenka¨fer Myelophilusminor Htg. und Ipsacuminatus Gyll. Medd.41: 1–52GaoXZhouXWangHKonget al. (2017) Influence of severe drought on the resistance of Pinusyunnanensis, to a bark beetle-associated fungus. Forest Pathology 47(4): e12345. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12345GibbsJNInmanA (1991) The pine shoot beetle Tomicuspiniperda as a vector of blue stain fungi to windblown pine.64: 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/64.3.239GlassNLDonaldsonGC (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes.61: 1323–1330. DOI: 10.0000/PMID7747954GortonCWebberJF (2000) Reevaluation of the status of the blue-stain fungus and bark beetle associate Ophiostomaminus.92: 1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.2307/3761474GortonCKimSHHenricotBetal. (2004) Phylogenetic analysis of the blue-stain fungus Ophiostomaminus based on partial ITS rDNA and β-tubulin gene sequences.108: 759–765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756204000012HarringtonTCMcNewDSteimelJetal. (2001) Phylogeny and taxonomy of the Ophiostomapiceae complex and the Dutch elm disease fungi. Mycologia 111–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3761610HarringtonTCPashenovaNVMcNewDLetal. (2002) Species delimitation and host specialization of Ceratocystislaricicola and C.polonica to Larch and Spruce.86: 418–422. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.4.418HedgcockGG (1906) Studies upon some chromogenic fungi which discolor wood.17: 59–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2400089JacobsKBergdahlDRWingfieldMJetal. (2004) Leptographiumwingfieldii introduced into North America and found associated with exotic Tomicuspiniperda and native bark beetles.108(4): 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756204009748JankowiakR (2006) Fungi associated with Tomicuspiniperda in Poland and assessment of their virulence using Scots pine seedlings.63(7): 801–808. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006063JankowiakR (2008) Fungi associated with Tomicusminor on Pinussylvestris in Poland and their succession into the sapwood of beetle-infested windblown trees.38(10): 2579–2588. https://doi.org/10.1139/X08-101JankowiakRBilańskiP (2007) Fungal flora associated with Tomicuspiniperda L. in an area close to a timber yard in southern Poland.131(8): 579–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01194.xJiMDongXQLiuHPetal. (2007) Preliminary Study on Remote Sensing Detection of Yunnan Pine Forest Damaged by Tomicuspiniperda.36(1): 87–90.KatohKStandleyDM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010KimJJLimYWBreuilCetal. (2005) A new Leptographium species associated with Tomicuspiniperda infesting pine logs in Korea.109(3): 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756204002060KirkendallLRFaccoliMYeH (2008) Description of the Yunnan shoot borer, Tomicusyunnanensis Kirkendall and Faccoli sp. n.(Curculionidae, Scolytinae), an unusually aggressive pine shoot beetle from southern China, with a key to the species of Tomicus.1819: 25–39.KirisitsT (2004) Fungal associates of European bark beetles with special emphasis on the ophiostomatoid fungi. In: LieutierFDayKRBattistiAGrégoireJCEvansHF (Eds) Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, A Synthesis., 181–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2241-8_10KlepzigKD (1998) Competition between a biological control fungus, Ophiostomapiliferum, and symbionts of the southern pine beetle.90: 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1998.12026880KubátováANovotnýDPrášilKetal. (2000) The nematophagous hyphomycete Esteyavermicola found in the Czech Republic.52(3): 227–235.KostovcikMBatemanCCKolarikMetal. (2014) The ambrosia symbiosis is specific in some species and promiscuous in others: evidence from community pyrosequencing.9(1): 126. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.115LagerbergT (1927) Biological and practical researches into blueing in pine and spruce. Sven Skogsvardsforen Tidskr 25, 145–272.LiLSWangHLChaiXShuN (1997) Study on the Biological Characteristics of Tomicuspiniperda and Its Damage.2: 1–7.LiLSLiuHPChenPetal. (2006) Comparison study on ecological characteristics of Tomicuspiniperda and T.minor.35(1): 1–5.LiXZhangZWangHBetal. (2010) Tomicusarmandii Li & Zhang (Curculionidae, Scolytinae), a new species from China.2572: 57–64.LiYHuangYTKassonMTetal. (2018) Specific and promiscuous ophiostomatalean fungi associated with Platypodinae ambrosia beetles in the southeastern United States.35: 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2018.06.006LiaoZYYeH (2004) Action mechanisms of phytotoxin produced by Leptographiumyunnanense associated with Tomicus.23(1): 20–22.LieutierF (2002) Mechanisms of resistance in conifers and bark beetle attack strategies. In: WagnerMRClancyKMLieutierFPaineTD (Eds) Mechanisms and Deployment of Resistance in Trees to Insects., 31–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47596-0_2LieutierFYeHYartA (2003) Shoot damage by Tomicus sp. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and effect on Pinusyunnanensis resistance to subsequent reproductive attacks in the stem. Agric.5: 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-9563.2003.00182.xLieutierFYartAGarciaJetal. (1989) Champignons phytopathogènes associés à deux coléoptères scolytidae du pin sylvestre (Pinussylvestris L.) et étude préliminaire de leur agressivité envers l’hôte, Ann. Sci. For. 46: 201–216 https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19890301 [in French with English summary].LieutierFLangstromBFaccoliM (2015) The genus Tomicus. In F. E. Vega and R. W. Hofstetter (eds.), Bark beetles: biology and ecology of native and invasive species. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 371–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417156-5.00010-1LinnakoskiRJankowiakRVillariCKirisitsTSolheimHetal. (2016) The Ophiostomaclavatum species complex: a newly defined group in the Ophiostomatales including three novel taxa.109: 987–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-016-0700-yLinnakoskiRBeerZ W DNiemeläPetal. (2012) Associations of conifer-infesting bark beetles and fungi in Fennoscandia.3(1): 200–227. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects3010200LinnakoskiRde BeerZWAhtiainenJetal. (2010) Ophiostoma spp. associated with pine-and spruce-infesting bark beetles in Finland and Russia. Persoonia: Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 25: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects3010200LinnakoskiRde BeerZWRousiMetal. (2008) Fungi, including Ophiostomakarelicum sp. n. associated with scolytus ratzeburgi infesting birch in finland and russia.112(12): 1475–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2008.06.007LiouJYShihJYTzeanSS (1999) Esteya, a new nematophagous genus from Taiwan, attacking the pinewood nematode (Bursaphelenchusxylophilus).103(2): 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756298006984LuMZhouXDDe BeerZWetal. (2009) Ophiostomatoid fungi associated with the invasive pine-infesting bark beetle, Dendroctonusvalens, in China.38: 133–145.LuJZhaoTYeHetal. (2014) The shoot-feeding ecology of three Tomicus species in Yunnan Province, southwestern China. Journal of Insect Science 14: 37. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/14.1.37LuRCWangHBZhangZetal. (2012) Coexistence and competition between Tomicusyunnanensis and T.minor (coleoptera: scolytinae) in yunnan pine. Psyche A Journal of Entomology 2012(3): S17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/185312MadridHGenéJCanoJetal. (2010) Sporothrixbrunneoviolacea and Sporothrixdimorphospora, two new members of the Ophiostomastenoceras-Sporothrixschenckii complex.102(5): 1193–1203. https://doi.org/10.3852/09-320MarmolejoJGButinH (1990) New conifer-inhabiting species of Ophiostoma and Ceratocystiopsis (Ascomycetes, Microascales) from Mexico.42: 193–199.MarinMPreisigOWingfieldBDetal. (2005) Phenotypic and DNA sequence data comparisons reveal three discrete species in the Ceratocystispolonica species complex.109(10): 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095375620500362XMasuyaHKanekoSYamaokaYetal. (1999) Comparisons of ophiostomatoid fungi associated with Tomicuspiniperda and T.minor in Japanese red pine.4(2): 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02762237MathiesenA (1950) Über einige mit Borkenkäfern assoziierten Bläuepilze in Schweden.2: 275–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/3564798MathiesenA (1951) Einige neue Ophiostoma-Arten in Schweden. Sven. Bot.45: 203–232.Mathiesen-KäärikA (1953) Eine Übersicht über die gewöhnlichsten mit Borkenkäfern assoziierten Bläuepilze in Schweden und einige für Schweden neue Bläuepilze, Meddn. St. Skogforsk Inst, 431–74.MengXJLuQLiuXWetal. (2015) The species specific associations between Ipssubelongatus and ophiostomatoid fungi.35(2): 313–323.MunchE (1907) Die Blaufaule des Nadelholzes. Naturwiss. Ztschr. F. Forst .U.5: 531–573.NkuekamG Kde BeerZ WWingfieldM Jetal. (2012) A diverse assemblage of Ophiostoma species, including two new taxa on eucalypt trees in South Africa.11(2): 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-011-0767-9OhtakaNMasuyaHYamaokaYetal. (2006) Two new Ophiostoma species lacking conidial states isolated from bark beetles and bark beetle-infested Abies species in Japan.84(2): 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1139/b05-164PaciuraDZhouXDde BeerZWetal. (2010) Characterisation of synnematous bark beetle-associated fungi from China, including Graphiumcarbonarium sp. n.40(1): 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-009-0004-xPanYChenPLuJetal. (2017) First report of blue-stain in Pinusyunnanensis caused by Ophiostomatingens associated with Tomicusminor in china.99(3): 805.PfenningLOberwinklerF (1993) Ophiostomabragantinum n. sp., a possible teleomorph of Sporothrixinflata, found in Brazil.46: 381–385.RaynerRW (1970) A mycological colour chart. CMI and British Mycological Society, Kew, Surrey, UK.RennerfeltE (1950) Uber den Zusammenhang zwischen dem Verblauendes Holzes und den Insekten.2: 120–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/3564666SeifertKAWebberJFWingfieldMJ (1993) Methods for studying species of Ophiostoma and Ceratocystis. Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: taxonomy, ecology and pathogenicity. Minnesota, U.S.A., The American Phytopathological Society Press, 255–259.Sabbatini PeverieriGCaprettiPTiberiR (2006) Associations between Tomicusdestruens and Leptographium spp. in Pinuspinea and P.pinaster stands in Tuscany, central Italy. For. Pathol 36, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.2006.00427.xSixDL (2003) Bark beetle-fungus symbiosis. In: BourtzisKMillerTA (Eds) Insect Symbiosis., 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203009918.ch7SixDL (2012) Ecological and Evolutionary Determinants of Bark Beetle–Fungus Symbioses.3: 339–366. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects3010339SixDLPaineTDA (1999) Phylogenetic comparison of ascomycete mycangial fungi and Dendroctonus bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).92: 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/92.2.159SixDLWingfieldMJ (2011) The role of phytopathogenicity in bark beetle-fungus symbioses: a challenge to the classic paradigm.56: 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144839SolheimHLångströmB (1991) Blue-stain fungi associated with Tomicuspiniperda in Sweden and preliminary observations on their pathogenicity, Ann. Sci. For.48: 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19910203SolheimHKrokenePLångströmB (2001) Effects of growth and virulence of associated blue-stain fungi on host colonization behavior of the pine shoot beetles Tomicusminor and T.piniperda.50: 111–16. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.2001.00541.xStamatakisA (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.22: 2688–2690. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446SwoffordDL (2003) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02198856TamuraKPetersonDPetersonNetal. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.28: 2731–2739. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121UpadhyayHP (1981) A monograph of Ceratocystis and Ceratocystiopsis. Univ. Georgia Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858713VilgalysRHesterM (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species.172: 4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990WangCYFangZMWangZetal. (2009) High infection activities of two Esteyavermicola isolates against pinewood nematode.3(10): 581–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-007-0122-7WangXWangTWangJetal. (2014) Morphological, molecular and biological characterization of Esteyavermicola, a nematophagous fungus isolated from intercepted wood packing materials exported from Brazil.55(5): 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.myc.2014.01.002WingfieldM JGarnasJ RHajekAetal. (2016) Novel and co-evolved associations between insects and microorganisms as drivers of forest pestilence.18(4): 1045–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1084-7WingfieldMJBarnesIDe BeerZWetal. (2017) Novel associations between ophiostomatoid fungi, insects and tree hosts: current status–future prospects. Biological Invasions: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1468-3WhiteTJBrunsTLeeSTaylorJ (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: InnisMAGelfandDHSninskyJJWhiteTJ (Eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and application., 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1YamaokaYMasuyaHOhtakaNetal. (2004) Three new Ophiostoma species with Pesotum anamorphs associated with bark beetles infesting Abies species in Nikko, Japan.45(4): 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10267-004-0179-7YamaokaYChungW HMasuyaHetal. (2008) The teleomorph of Leptographiumyunnanense, discovered in crosses among isolates from Thailand, China, and Japan.49(4): 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10267-008-0412-XYinMWingfieldMJZhouXetal. (2016) Multigene phylogenies and morphological characterization of five new Ophiostoma spp. associated with spruce-infesting bark beetles in China.120(4): 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2015.12.004YeH (1991) On the bionomy of Tomicuspiniperda (L.) (Coleoptera:Scolytidae)in the Kunming region of China.112: 366–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1991.tb01069.xYeHZhouXLuJYangLDingH (2000) A preliminary study on the occurrence and pathogenicity of the fungi associated with Tomicus.13: 451–454.YeH (2011) Tomicusyunnanensis. Kunming: Yunnan Science and Technology Publishing Press.YeHDangCL (1986) The study on the feature of the bark beetle (Blastophaguspiniperda L.) injuring the pine tree (Pinusyunnanensis).8(2): 218–221.YeHFLieutier (1997) Shoot aggregation by Tomicuspiniperda L (Col: Scolytidae) in Yunnan, southwestern China. Ann.54: 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19970704YeHDingXS (1999) Impacts of Tomicusminor on distribution and reproduction of Tomicuspiniperda (Col., Scolytidae) on the trunk of the living Pinusyunnanensis trees. J. Appl.123: 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0418.1999.00353.xZhangYHagenFStielowBetal. (2015) Phylogeography and evolutionary patterns in Sporothrix spanning more than 14 000 human and animal case reports.35: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158515X687416ZhouXDde BeerZWWingfieldMJ (2013) Ophiostomatoid fungi associated with conifer infecting bark beetles in China. In: SeifertKAde BeerZWWingfieldMJ (Eds) Ophiostomatoidfungi: Expanding frontiers., 91–98.ZhouXDJacobsKWingfiledMJetal. (2000) A new Leptographium species associated with Tomicuspiniperda in South Western China.41: 573–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460923ZipfelRDBeerZW deJacobsKetal. (2006) Multigene phylogenies define Ceratocystiopsis and Grosmannia distinct from Ophiostoma.55: 75–97. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.55.1.75